!1 of!8 Nest+M Debate. Nest + M Debate
|
|
- Kelly Payne
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 !1 of!8 Nest+M Debate Nest + M Debate
2 !2 of!8 Nest+M Debate Table of Contents 1: Cover Page 2: Table of Contents 3: Debate Tryouts Information 4: Debate Videos 5-8: Basic Debate Speech Breakdown (AREI)
3 ! 3 of! 8 Nest+M Debate Debate Tryouts On Thursday, September 13th from 3-6pm all students who are interested in trying out for the competitive debate team must come prepared to debate the motion Political Correctness has gone too far. Students should prepare 5 minute speeches for both proposition (you agree that it's gone too far) and opposition (you disagree that it's gone too far). In the speeches, students should develop 3-4 arguments in the AREI (Assertion, Reason, Evidence, Impact) formula to argue for either side of the motion. Students will find out which side they speak on when they arrive at tryouts. There will be one speaker on proposition who gives a 5 minute speech that includes 3-4 arguments. On opposition, there will be one speaker who gives a 5 minute speech with refutation for the arguments of the proposition speaker and at least 2 arguments of their own. The speaker on proposition will then be given 1 minute to refute opposition s arguments. POIs: A POI is a point of information. The opponents of the speaker can stand to give a refutation or present information that undermines the speaker's arguments during unprotected time unprotected time is from the 2nd to the 4th minute of a speaker's speech. Protected time is the 1st and 5th minute of a speaker's speech. During protected time, opponents of the speaker cannot stand for POIs. The judge will signal when protected time is over and when it comes back on. It is mandatory for students to give at least 2 POIs and for speakers to accept at least 1. Students will be expected to engage with and refute their opponent s arguments and POIs during tryouts. Please see the pdf below and videos on the next page for further clarification. Please read page 5 of this document on POIs: 564f4570e4b07b93990a546e/t/564f9f87e4b0cb706002cebb/ /MSPDP+Rules pdf Pre-written notes/speeches will not be used in the actual debate, however students can bring pre-written notes/speeches to tryouts. Students will be given a blank paper on which they can rewrite their pre-written notes/speeches. This preparation method closely resembles the actual process of giving a speech at a tournament. It is meant to help students talk to the judges directly, rather than reading from a sheet of paper for the entire speech. Approximately 25 students will be selected for the competitive debate team, which will meet only on Tuesdays and Thursdays. All students who enroll in debate but do not make the competitive team are welcome to enroll in the Debate Skills class which meets on Mondays.
4 ! 4 of! 8 Nest+M Debate After this page, you ll find a basic speech breakdown. This is to help you get a detailed understanding of speeches before tryouts, but please do not feel overwhelmed. Just as long as you understand the basic AREI (Assertion, Reason, Evidence, Impact) formula for an argument, you will do well at tryouts! In class, we go over advanced debate speeches. If you are new to debate, then it may be easier for you to watch these videos and take notes: In Youtube, type MSPDP Sample Debate: Television is a Bad Influence In Youtube, type 2016 ESU MSPDP Championship Debate v=diyargpaof0&app=desktop
5 ! 5 of! 8 Nest+M Debate Basic Debate Speech Breakdown: Organization and AREI (Assertion, Reasoning, Evidence, Impact) Introduction *All debaters can introduce themselves, but the opening proposition (the first speaker on proposition) is the only one who should restate the motion in his/her introduction for clarity, but everyone else can go straight into their speeches. Road Map and Signpost: *Everyone should Roadmap* Before: At the beginning of your speech, tell the judge how your speech is organized, Ex: I have three main arguments. The first argument is, the second argument is, and the third argument is. During: During your speech, before you go from the 1st argument to the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th arguments, signpost where you are in your speech so the judge knows. Ex: Now I will argue my second point, which is. After: During the conclusion, tell the judge what you ve just gone over ( What did I go over in this speech? I told you that. ) This all helps the judge organize his/her notes better. It follows that the more organized your argument, the easier it is for the judge to evaluate you, and the higher your chances are of getting a good score.
6 ! 6 of! 8 Nest+M Debate Argument Formula (AREI) For Each Argument: Argument 1 (A) Assertion (statement with no reasoning or proof): *Ex: Public schools are better than private schools (but I don t know why)* (R) Reasoning (logic, logos, use causation, not correlation): This is where you give reasons for your previous statement.* Ex. public schools are better because. (E) Evidence (pathos, ethos): Provide statistics, stories, and/or facts for backup and proof. (I)Impact (how does this help or hurt society?): *Why is this important? Why should the majority of people care? Why should the judge care?
7 ! 7 of! 8 Nest+M Debate Argument 2 (A) Assertion (statement with no reasoning or proof): *Ex: Public schools are better than private schools (but I don t know why)* (R) Reasoning (logic, logos, use causation, not correlation): This is where you give reasons for your previous statement.* Ex. public schools are better because. (E) Evidence (pathos, ethos): Provide statistics, stories, and/or facts for backup and proof. (I) Impact (how does this help or hurt society?): *Why is this important? Why should the majority of people care? Why should the judge care?
8 ! 8 of! 8 Nest+M Debate Argument 3 (A) Assertion (statement with no reasoning or proof): *Ex: Public schools are better than private schools (but I don t know why)* (R) Reasoning (logic, logos, use causation, not correlation): This is where you give reasons for your previous statement.* Ex. public schools are better because. (E) Evidence (pathos, ethos): Provide statistics, stories, and/or facts for backup and proof. (I) Impact (how does this help or hurt society?): *Why is this important? Why should the majority of people care? Why should the judge care?
Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10
3 rd Annual Great Corporate Debate Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10 Stephen Buchanan Education Consulting Outline of Session # 2 Persuasion topics Great Corporate Debate Review Contest,
More informationCorporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1
5 th Annual Great Corporate Debate Corporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1 Stephen Buchanan Education Consulting Outline of Session # 2 Great Corporate Debate Review Contest, Rules, Judges
More informationLogical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS
Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS Rhetorical Appeals Ethos Appeals to credibility Pathos Appeals to emotion Logos Appeals to logic Structure of an Analysis/Argument Arguments operate under logic Your
More informationExplanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point
Claim - Expresses your position or stand on the issue (YOUR OPINION ON A TOPIC) - States precisely what you believe (and perhaps WHY you believe it) - This is the viewpoint you want readers to accept or
More informationPersuasive/ Argumentative writing
Persuasive/ Argumentative writing Learning targets I can write arguments to support claims using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. I can introduce precise claims, distinguish the claim
More informationArgumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4
Argumentative Writing 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4 Unit Objectives IWBAT - Write an argumentative essay that supports claims in an analysis of a topic and uses valid reasoning,
More informationArgumentative Writing
Argumentative Writing Anca T-Hummel NBCT-AYA/ELA taus-hummel@phoenixunion.org Joanna Nichols I.L. English jnichols@phoenixunion.org ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY The argumentative essay is a genre of writing that
More informationDebate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25
Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25 Like this study set? Create a free account to save it. Create a free account Accident Adapting Ad hominem attack (Attack on the person) Advantage Affirmative
More information2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation
VI. RULES OF PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE A. General 1. Public Forum Debate is a form of two-on-two debate which ask debaters to discuss a current events issue. 2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development
More informationb. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;
IV. RULES OF LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE A. General 1. Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a form of two-person debate that focuses on values, their inter-relationships, and their relationship to issues of contemporary
More informationStatement. Assertion. Elaboration. Reasoning. Argument Building. Statement / Assertion
Argument Building Statement Assertion Elaboration Reasoning Example Example Statement / Assertion Is the title/ lable of your argument. It should be precise and easy to understand. Better assertions help
More informationRULES FOR DISCUSSION STYLE DEBATE
RULES FOR DISCUSSION STYLE DEBATE Junior High Discussion (2 Person Teams) Beginner Level Open Level 1 st Affirmative Constructive 5 min 6 min 1 st Negative Constructive 5 min 6 min 2 nd Affirmative Constructive
More informationBlueprint for Writing a Paper
Khalifa Blueprint for Papers 1 Blueprint for Writing a Paper Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College The following is my best attempt to give you a color-by-numbers approach to writing
More informationIII. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General
III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE A. General 1. All debates must be based on the current National High School Debate resolution chosen under the auspices of the National Topic Selection Committee of the
More informationAn Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating
An Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating The Oxford Union Schools Competition uses a format known as British Parliamentary (BP) debating. This is the format used by most university competitions
More informationMPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic
MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your
More informationAn Introduction to Parliamentary Debate
What is Parliamentary Debate? At the most basic level, Parli is a form of debate in which you and a partner from your own team debate 2 people from another team. You are debating to support or oppose a
More informationA Brief Guide to Writing Argumentative Essays
Doc Holley s A. P. English Language & Composition They could do it because they believed they could. Vergil 70-19 B.C. Roman A Brief Guide to Writing Argumentative Essays The art of argumentation is not
More informationVideo: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?
Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to
More informationWriting a Persuasive Essay
Writing a Persuasive Essay First Steps Develop essential questions surrounding your topic! Research! Articles from credible Internet sources, books, journals, magazines, etc. Evidence Evidence should support
More informationUSING LOGOS WISELY. AP Language and Composition
USING LOGOS WISELY AP Language and Composition LOGOS = LOGICAL REASONING Logic is the anatomy of thought - John Locke LOGICAL PROOFS SICDADS S = sign I = induction C = cause D = deduction A = analogy D
More informationSpeaker Roles POI. Refutation. Equity and Etiquette
AGENDA Speaker Roles POI Refutation Equity and Etiquette BP Basics: Speaker Roles SPEAKER ROLES 1st GOV Prime Minister 1 2 Leader of the Opposition 1st OPP Deputy Leader of the Government 3 4 Deputy Leader
More informationWhat is Persuasive Writing
Persuasive Writing Overview: Lesson This presentation will cover: The persuasive context The role of the audience What to research and cite How to establish your credibility What is Persuasive Writing
More informationVarsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26
Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26 Session will discuss on how to refute arguments more effectively. Tim Cook Salado High School Tim.cook@saladoisd.org Attention All Attendees:
More informationArgument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals
Argument and Persuasion Stating Opinions and Proposals The Method It all starts with an opinion - something that people can agree or disagree with. The Method Move to action Speak your mind Convince someone
More informationWhat is the difference between Expository Essays and Persuasive Essays?
What is the difference between Expository Essays and Persuasive Essays? Defining Persuasive Writing Persuasive Writing: Writing that has as its purpose convincing others to accept the writer s position
More informationScholasticism In the 1100s, scholars and monks rediscovered the ancient Greek texts that had been lost for so long. Scholasticism was a revival of
Scholasticism In the 1100s, scholars and monks rediscovered the ancient Greek texts that had been lost for so long. Scholasticism was a revival of the ancient methods of logic and reasoning applied to
More informationFCAT READING SKILL Distinguishing Facts and Opinions
FCAT READING SKILL Distinguishing Facts and Opinions 1. What to do and what to watch for. A FACT is information that can be verified or PROVEN. You can t argue facts. An OPINION is information that CANNOT
More informationROLES OF TEAMS AND SPEAKERS
The British Parliamentary Format A Resource Module on BP Debating from the UP DEBATE SOCIETY Original Module By: Sir Martin Cortez, Carl Ng Current Version Edited By: Sabrina-Laya Gacad, Melissa Sayoc
More informationClaim Types C L A S S L E C T U R E N O T E S Identifying Types of Claims in Your Papers
Claim Types C L A S S L E C T U R E N O T E S Identifying Types of in Your Papers Background: Models of Argument Most textbooks for College Composition devote a chapter to the Classical Model of argument
More information! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay
Prep Writing Persuasive Essay Purpose: The writer will learn how to effectively plan, draft, and compose a persuasive essay using the writing process. Objectives: The learner will: Demonstrate an understanding
More informationPersuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,
Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language, rhythmic patterns of speech, etc. Logical Argument Appeals
More informationWhat is Debate? Debating vs. Arguing. Formal Debate vs. Informal Debate
What is Debate? Debating vs. Arguing Formal Debate vs. Informal Debate What is Debate? Formal debates are structured exchanges of ideas which adhere to pre-determined rules intended to be fair. Different
More informationRhetorical Appeals: The Available Means of Persuasion
Rhetorical Appeals: The Available Means of Persuasion Aristotle defined Rhetoric as the available means of persuasion. But what are these available means? Think about it this way: what are the various
More informationThe Art of Persuasive Writing
The Art of Persuasive Writing Forms of Persuasive Writing Advertisements Editorials Speeches Propaganda Reviews Blogs Persuasive Essays Forms of Persuasive Writing Advertisements try to convince you to
More informationReading and Evaluating Arguments
Reading and Evaluating Arguments Learning Objectives: To recognize the elements of an argument To recognize types of arguments To evaluate arguments To recognize errors in logical reasoning An argument
More informationCHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.
Logos Ethos Pathos Chapter 13 CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior. Persuasive speaking: process of doing so in
More informationWriting the Persuasive Essay
Writing the Persuasive Essay What is a persuasive/argument essay? In persuasive writing, a writer takes a position FOR or AGAINST an issue and writes to convince the reader to believe or do something Persuasive
More informationAnnotated Works Consulted
Annotated Works Consulted Step One Find the sources Tip: Find more than 12 sources, because some may not be as informative or ontopic as they first appear. Keeping Your Research Organized Keep a folder
More information2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition
FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition Argumentative Fallacies The Logic of Writing and Debate from http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.html
More informationWriting Essays at Oxford
Writing Essays at Oxford Introduction One of the best things you can take from an Oxford degree in philosophy/politics is the ability to write an essay in analytical philosophy, Oxford style. Not, obviously,
More informationPHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy
PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Session 3 September 9 th, 2015 All About Arguments (Part II) 1 A common theme linking many fallacies is that they make unwarranted assumptions. An assumption is a claim
More informationGrab an Everything s an Argument book off the shelf by the flags. INTRO TO RHETORIC
Grab an Everything s an Argument book off the shelf by the flags. INTRO TO RHETORIC Everything is an Argument You are bombarded with them all the time! The average American sees over 3000 advertisements
More informationPHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE
PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE One: What ought to be the primary objective of your essay? The primary objective of your essay is not simply to present information or arguments, but to put forward a cogent argument
More informationFinding Gaps in Sources
Finding Gaps in Sources Overall Use MAN analysis ask what is: M issing; what information is left out A skewed; what use of data is misrepresented or problematic N eglected; what point should have been
More informationContent Area Variations of Academic Language
Academic Expressions for Interpreting in Language Arts 1. It really means because 2. The is a metaphor for 3. It wasn t literal; that s the author s way of describing how 4. The author was trying to teach
More informationThe Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.
BASIC ARGUMENTATION Alfred Snider, University of Vermont World Schools Debate Academy, Slovenia, 2015 Induction, deduction, causation, fallacies INDUCTION Definition: studying a sufficient number of analogous
More informationDebate and Debate Adjudication
Debate and Debate Adjudication Rachmat Nurcahyo,M.A. Yogyakarta State University National Polythecnic English Debate Competition 2012, Tual Maluku Tenggara Overview What is Competitive Debate Understanding
More informationCreating a Persuasive Speech
Creating a Persuasive Speech Argumentation - Review Every argument needs to have three parts: Claim Your main idea/point Evidence Support from other sources (may fall within logos, pathos and/or ethos)
More informationPREPARING FOR THE ACT/SAT ESSAY. Who knows but that you have come to royal position for such a time as this?- Esther 4:14
PREPARING FOR THE ACT/SAT ESSAY Who knows but that you have come to royal position for such a time as this?- Esther 4:14 Free SAT/ACT download @ http://forsuchatimeasthis.com Who knows but that you have
More informationChp 5. Speakers, Speeches: The British Parliamentary Format
Chp 5 Speakers, Speeches: The British Parliamentary Format Three Ways to Win in B.P. Know things! Talk pretty! Fulfill your role! But first a quick review... Types of Argumentation (Chp 4) Framing Construction
More informationThe SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy
The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy Overview Taking an argument-centered approach to preparing for and to writing the SAT Essay may seem like a no-brainer. After all, the prompt, which is always
More informationIntroducing truth tables. Hello, I m Marianne Talbot and this is the first video in the series supplementing the Formal Logic podcasts.
Introducing truth tables Marianne: Hello, I m Marianne Talbot and this is the first video in the series supplementing the Formal Logic podcasts. Okay, introducing truth tables. (Slide 2) This video supplements
More informationEveryone likes to argue!
The Argument Essay Everyone likes to argue! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqfkti6gn9y https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_h_cohen_for_argument_s_sake#t -7565 The Argument Essay The basic structure of an
More informationArgument Mapping. Table of Contents. By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012
Argument Mapping By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012 Table of Contents Argument Mapping...1 Introduction...2 Chapter 1: Examples of argument maps...2 Chapter 2: The difference between multiple arguments and
More informationFigures removed due to copyright restrictions.
Lincoln/Douglas Debate Figures removed due to copyright restrictions. Debating is like Fencing Thrust Making assertions backed by evidence Parry R f Refuting opponents assertions Burden of Proof In a formal
More informationARGUMENT ESSAY WRITING
ARGUMENT ESSAY WRITING THESIS STATEMENTS A thesis statement manages to encapsulate an essay s main argument in a one-sentence succinct statement. Writers often find it useful to create a road map thesis,
More informationTallinn EUDC Judges Briefing
Tallinn EUDC 2017 - Judges Briefing Contents I. Deciding who wins II. Decision making process III. Deliberations IV. Announcing results V. Common mistakes in adjudication Acknowledgements and opening remarks
More informationARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT
ARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT Adapted from Reading Rhetorically (A Reader for Writers), 2nd edition by Virginia A. Chappell and Alice M. Gillam and Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings,
More informationPower Match opponent has the same win/loss record as you
LD Basics Terms to know 1. Value Foundation for your case Clash of value and support of value is imperative to your case. Ex. Morality, justice, freedom of speech 2. Criterion- Supporting thesis statement
More informationWhat an argument is not
Expectations: As you go through this information on argumentation, you need to take notes in some fashion. You may simply print this document and bring it with you to class. You may also take notes like
More informationFive Paragraph Essay. Structure, Elements, Advice
Five Paragraph Essay Structure, Elements, Advice Structure - 5 paragraphs 1) Introductory Paragraph (Intro) a) Hook, Connection, Thesis 2) Body Paragraph One a) 1st subtopic - follow format 3) Body Paragraph
More informationResearch Package #1. Canadian National Style
Research Package #1 Canadian National Style (Canadian National Style is a type of debate inspired by the style of debate used at the World Schools Debating Championships. National Style is Worlds Style
More informationReplies to Hasker and Zimmerman. Trenton Merricks. Molinism: The Contemporary Debate edited by Ken Perszyk. Oxford University Press, I.
Replies to Hasker and Zimmerman Trenton Merricks Molinism: The Contemporary Debate edited by Ken Perszyk. Oxford University Press, 2011. I. Hasker Here is how arguments by reductio work: you show that
More informationPHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy
PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Session 3 September 10 th, 2014 Methods: Reading Philosophy 1 Reading Philosophy As we saw from Russell s essay, it can be difficult to decode what an author is saying,
More informationThe Thematic Essay Part II of the Global Regents Exam
The Thematic Essay Part II of the Global Regents Exam What is a thematic essay? A thematic essay is an essay that requires you to write a 4-5 paragraph essay about a specific theme. Part of the Essay The
More informationMAIN BUILDING C
MAIN BUILDING C1-065 writingcentre@ul.ie www.ul.ie/rwc Writing Centre Resources One-to-One Peer Tutoring Writers Groups Workshops and Seminars Online Resources Writers Space RWC Events UL s One Campus
More informationDEBATE HANDBOOK. Paul Hunsinger, Ph.D. Chairman of Speech Department. Alan Price, M.A. Assistant Director of Debate
DEBATE HANDBOOK DEBATE HANDBOOK Paul Hunsinger, Ph.D. Chairman of Speech Department Alan Price, M.A. Assistant Director of Debate Roy Wood, Ph.D. Director of Forensics Printed with permission of the copyright
More informationCHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument
CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument General Overview: As our students often attest, we all live in a complex world filled with demanding issues and bewildering challenges. In order to determine those
More informationREADING SEUSS...2 THE THESIS SENTENCE...3 WRITING YOUR THESIS STATEMENT...4 SAMPLE THESIS...4 YOUR TURN FOR A THESIS...4
Table of Contents READING SEUSS...2 THE THESIS SENTENCE...3 WRITING YOUR THESIS STATEMENT...4 SAMPLE THESIS...4 YOUR TURN FOR A THESIS...4 PROVE IT...5 PROVE IT WITH LOGIC...5 PROVE IT WITH EVIDENCE...5
More informationToastmasters International Debate Organizer (Summarized)
General Information Toastmasters International Debate Organizer (Summarized) Location: Date/Format: Resolved: Judge 1: Judge 3: Judge 2: Judge 4(?): Affirmative Speaker 1: Negative Speaker 1: Affirmative
More informationThird essay on the AP test Will give you either a statement or a short passage to read You must write an argument in which you take a position on
Third essay on the AP test Will give you either a statement or a short passage to read You must write an argument in which you take a position on that statement 1. Passage or statement 2. In a well-written
More informationCOACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT?
COACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT? Some people think that engaging in argument means being mad at someone. That s one use of the word argument. In debate we use a far different meaning of the term.
More informationThe Art of Persuasive Writing
The Art of Persuasive Writing Forms of Persuasive Writing Advertisements Editorials Speeches Propaganda Reviews Blogs Persuasive Essays Forms of Persuasive Writing Advertisements try to convince you to
More informationJUDGING Policy Debate
JUDGING Policy Debate Table of Contents Overview... 2 Round Structure... 3 Parts of an Argument... 4 How to Determine the Winner... 5 What to Do After the Round... 6 Sample Ballot... 7 Sample Flow Sheet...
More informationVisitor Connections and Follow Up at Church of the Resurrection
Visitor Connections and Follow Up at Church of the Resurrection Our Purpose is to build a Christian community where non-religious and nominally religious people are becoming deeply committed Christians.
More informationPropaganda Collection: A Project for Practicing Persuasive Techniques
English II Pre-AP 3rd Quarter Propaganda Collection: A Project for Practicing Persuasive Techniques This project is due Friday, February 26, 2016. Cold War Propaganda: Propaganda Collection: Directions
More informationBreaking Down Barriers: How to Debate Sample of The Basics Section
Breaking Down Barriers: How to Debate Sample of The Basics Section Written by Jim Hanson with Brian Simmonds, Jeff Shaw and Ross Richendrfer Breaking Down Barriers: How to Debate Sample of The Basics Section
More informationAICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2
AICE Thinking kills Review How to Master Paper 2 Important Things to Remember You are given 1 hour and 45 minutes for Paper 2 You should spend approximately 30 minutes on each question Write neatly! Read
More informationhij Teacher Resource Bank
hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Unit D Religion, Philosophy and Science Example of Candidate s Work from the January 2009 Examination Candidate B Copyright 2009 AQA and its licensors. All
More informationApologetics Table of Contents
Apologetics Table of Contents APOLOGETICS TABLE OF CONTENTS... 1 RUNNING AN APOLOGETICS CLASS... 3 HOW TO USE THIS CURRICULUM... 3 LESSON 1: INTRODUCTION... 5 1. WELCOME... 5 2. LECTURE... 5 3. ASSIGNMENT...
More informationStop, Look, And Listen - Waiting for Jesus
Stop, Look, And Listen - Waiting for Jesus This lesson will help children understand the importance of being ready while waiting for Jesus' return. They will also learn what it means to be patient. by
More informationThe Persuasive Speech
The Persuasive Speech INTRODUCTION: Most of the writing of the American Revolution was public and political; much of it was also persuasive in nature. Patrick Henry's "Speech in the Virginia Convention"
More informationAttacking your opponent s character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument
Also known as the false dilemma, this deceptive tactic has the appearance of forming a logical argument, but under closer scrutiny it becomes evident that there are more possibilities than the either/or
More informationRefutation Paragraphs
Refutation Paragraphs The refutation paragraph is normally found ONLY in argument essays and argument research papers; it is also known as the concession paragraph. When students are writing an argumentative
More informationMinnesota Debate Teachers Association Public Forum Guide. A student and coach s guide to Public Forum Debate DRAFT
Minnesota Debate Teachers Association Public Forum Guide A student and coach s guide to Public Forum Debate DRAFT Page 2 CHAPTER I: WHAT IS DEBATE?... 5 BEING ON THE DEBATE TEAM... 5 THE BENEFITS OF DEBATE...
More informationWHY PLANTINGA FAILS TO RECONCILE DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGE
WHY PLANTINGA FAILS TO RECONCILE DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGE AND LIBERTARIAN FREE WILL Andrew Rogers KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Abstract In this paper I argue that Plantinga fails to reconcile libertarian free will
More informationThree Steps to Good Structure
Three Steps to Good Structure Three Steps to Good Structure 1. Create a thesis statement. 2. Develop and outline the argument of your paper. 3. When revising your paper ask yourself, How does this paragraph
More informationLogic, Deductive And Inductive By Carveth Read READ ONLINE
Logic, Deductive And Inductive By Carveth Read READ ONLINE If searched for a ebook by Carveth Read Logic, deductive and inductive in pdf form, in that case you come on to the faithful website. We present
More information4181 ( 10.5), = 625 ( 11.2), = 125 ( 13). 311 PPO, p Cf. also: All the errors that have been made in this chapter of the
122 Wittgenstein s later writings 14. Mathematics We have seen in previous chapters that mathematical statements are paradigmatic cases of internal relations. 310 And indeed, the core in Wittgenstein s
More informationA R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N
ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around
More informationCommon Ground On Creation Keeping The Focus on That God Created and Not When
Common Ground On Creation Keeping The Focus on That God Created and Not When truehorizon.org COMMON GROUND ON CREATION Christian theism offers answers to life s most profound questions that stand in stark
More informationPersuasive Language introduction to ethos, pathos & logos
Persuasive Language introduction to ethos, pathos & logos ARISTOTLE was a Greek philosopher who lived in the th century BCE. He was an influential thinker and wrote on many subjects from logic and ethics,
More informationProgram Guide for How to be a critical thinker (#4 of 6) Sunday
Agenda/timing (11:45 am 1 pm): ------------------------------------------------------- Program Guide for How to be a critical thinker (#4 of 6) Sunday 4-28-13 Textbook: "How to Think About Weird Things:
More informationCritical thinking and the art of questioning - introduction
Critical thinking and the art of questioning - introduction Kristof Van Rossem ITM, october 2013 www.socraticdialogue.be Objectives of the workshop list 1: The participants : know what critical thinking
More informationTransformation 2.0: Baseline Survey Summary Report
Transformation 2.0: Baseline Survey Summary Report Authorized by: The Presbytery of Cincinnati Congregational Development Task Force Conducted and Produced by The Missional Network 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY. Refuting opposing arguments
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY Definition Organization Supporting our ideas Refuting opposing arguments Language Sample argumentative essay Definition: In this kind of essay, we not only give information but also
More informationArrangement (Organizing) February 12, Ross Arnold, Winter 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology
Arrangement (Organizing) February 12, 2015 Ross Arnold, Winter 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology Communications & Homiletics (CL2) Jan. 29 Introduction to Rhetoric Feb. 5 Invention (finding the meaning)
More informationFREE WILL AND DETERMINISM: AN ADOPTION STUDY. James J. Lee, Matt McGue University of Minnesota Twin Cities
FREE WILL AND DETERMINISM: AN ADOPTION STUDY James J. Lee, Matt McGue University of Minnesota Twin Cities UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA RESEARCH TEAM James J. Lee, Department of Psychology Matt McGue, Department
More informationCircularity in ethotic structures
Synthese (2013) 190:3185 3207 DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0135-6 Circularity in ethotic structures Katarzyna Budzynska Received: 28 August 2011 / Accepted: 6 June 2012 / Published online: 24 June 2012 The Author(s)
More information