Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 1

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 1"

Transcription

1 Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 1 Chapter 1 is an introduction to the book. Clark intends to accomplish three things in this book: In the first place, although a theistic philosophy of systematic proportions has not been developed to meet contemporary needs, some elements and implications of theism in various fields are included in this book, that give an overview of what a theistic worldview would be. Secondly, from the mass of naturalistic literature, a comparison can be drawn between that and theism through the various subjects of academic interest. Clark hopes that the reader will be aware of how much intellectual capital is the result of reflective choice and how much is the result of imperceptible social absorption. Thirdly, Clark hopes to phrase most of this work into an introduction to philosophy. Clark moves through the introduction to questions of philosophy, and notes that while many may think that philosophy is dull, academic, boring, and uninteresting, it addresses many questions that are applicable to everyday life. Questions such as what kind of government is the best form, whether God has revealed any answers to life s questions, and whether history is taking us somewhere. What is the purpose of life? Is there any distinction between right and wrong? If man is the evolutionary product of chance, can any sacredness be assigned to life? These are important questions that philosophy can help us answer. Clark expresses the fact that logic will help guide our progress, and that, in worldviews, there is no neutral party. Everyone will make a decision on how they will live, and no one will be able not to make judgments. Suspension of judgment is not possible, and neither is neutrality. 1

2 Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 2 Chapter Two is an examination of the philosophy of history. In this chapter, Clark states that one of the most inviting gateways to philosophic thinking is the study of history. The study of history has been given a boost in recent years, but most of the questions still remain. The general problem of history is the formulation of a law which will enable us to understand the course of events and to make a probable guess about the future. Ancient philosophers had no such interest in history as such. However, Clark shows that in the last hundred years or so, there has been a resurgence in the understanding of history. Clark reviews several views of history, the first of which is Marxism, which pins all of history on economic factors. History is not a haphazard series of events, but one culture, civilization, nation, replaces or supplants one another by the operation of a fixed and definite cause, namely economic pressure. Clark shows that while economic pressure is a factor, it cannot be the only factor. Marxism failed to provide sufficient answers to history. The philosophy of progress is also one that Clark reviews. It states that progress must occur in all spheres of human interest, with things getting better and better. Negatively, progress is the denial of divine Providence; positively, progress is a natural process. This concept both undermined the belief in Providence, specifically Christianity, and also promised assurance that nothing could prevent indefinite scientific progress. However, since science is an instrument, it can produce things which can be used for evil and for good. It cannot determine evil and good. Political and social planning, biological 2

3 evolution, and social environment were all considered as far as progress goes, but none of them could provide any answers or laws for history and progress. Progress in its generic sense had no goal, and thus history moved along with no end point. Spengler and Toynbee both offered an empirical view of history. However, Clark states that empirical history is inherently impossible. If a person with a completely unbiased mind should try to study history, the thousand and one events that happens every minute the world over would doom him to a speedy failure. To make any progress at all, he would have to select some of these events and pay no attention to the others. Toynbee or any other student of history must select his facts and in the selection begin to impose his interpretation upon them. Clark finally provides an alternate view of history, a Christian one. He provides three aspects of a Christian view of history, given the axiomatic presuppositional view of Christianity. One is that God controls history. God not only has control over it, but will also bring it to its end. Thirdly, God himself acts in history. 3

4 Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 3 Chapter three is a discussion on a philosophy of politics. Politics is a subdivision of history. Clark states that just as the general laws of botany apply to plants, so the laws of universal history include the phenomena of politics. History, politics, and ethics are all related. Religion is also not exempt from politics. The question this chapter seeks to answer is, what form of state is best? Or, as Clark redefines it, what is the purpose of government? The issue that Clark reviews first is normative vs. descriptive politics. However, he clarifies that descriptive can never provide us what ought to be. No amount of factual information will imply that one form of government is better than another. Facts are statements about what is; ideals or standards are statements of what ought to be. A description of the variety of opinion cannot decide which opinion is best. The fact that a theory has been popular does not make it true. A description of norms is not a normative theory. It also does not follow that what is believed to be the ideal actually is the ideal. Clark reviews Aristotle and Plato briefly and shows that their views of government are highly totalitarian. Clark examines the questions of the purpose of state and shows that the greatest good for the greatest number obviously cannot be first ascertained without first determining the good of one man. The definition of good depends on the nature of man. Aristotle said that the citizen belonged to the state, and Spengler stated that society was an organism in which each man is but one blood cell. In this case, the sacrifice of man s life for the good of society is a light manner. Stalin and Hitler are both justified under this scheme. 4

5 Clark examines the justification of coercion and what justifies violence or coercion on the part of the state. Force cannot create morality. One must explain by what right the majority coerces the minority, or vice versa. Clark uses Rousseau to argue that coercion, or force, does not justify itself. Force creates no authority or right to rule. All authority, argues Rousseau, must be based on conventions. Only by some voluntary agreement can a social order be established, and it is the social order that is the basis of all other rights. When in this situation, a man refuses to perform his duty as a subject to this state, he may be coerced. However, in discussing Rousseau, Clark notes that the assertion that all rights are founded on the social compact seems to be inconsistent with the compact itself. If man in his natural state has no rights because all rights are founded on social convention, how can Rousseau consistently assert that in the social compact each associate alienates all his rights to the community? Rousseau also notes that a state or body is established by unanimous consent. However, Rousseau himself could not give the date and place of the compact established by the French people. If unanimous action is required to establish a government, then the United States has never had a legitimate government. The social contract theory can be made more plausible by discarding some of Rousseau s particularities and by attempting to see its value in the notion that a legitimate government depends on the consent of the governed. However, this has some of the same problems as Rousseau s theories. Clark shows that, according to the consent of the governed, if an amendment to exterminate the Jews is adopted, the government, on this theory, will then have not merely the force but the right to exterminate them. The voice 5

6 of the people become the voice of God. All of these theories have one thing in common they are totalitarian in some respects. Clark offers a theistic view of government. A God who is worth anything is a God who makes a difference in politics and in every phase of philosophy. Government is a divine institution. The authority of the government does not derive from any voluntary social compact, but it derives from God. God is the source of all rights. It is, however, the essence of government to coerce, and the power of the sword, the power of life and death, used both against crime and in war, is the most conspicuous form of coercion. These have been ordained by God. Government is not a natural institution like the family. The state was a partial punishment and cure for sin. However, unless the rights of government are given and limited by God, there is no systematic ground between anarchy and dictatorship. Governments are without authority beyond the limits set by God. If the magistrates exceed their authority, no one is under obligation to obey. Christian presuppositions justify civil governments of limited rights, whereas humanistic principles imply either anarchy or totalitarianism. Only in a theistic worldview can both anarchy and totalitarianism be avoided. 6

7 Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 4 Chapter 4 is a discussion of the philosophy of ethics. Clark states that it is impossible to arrive at a satisfactory theory of politics without first settling the question of ethics. The question of good and evil, right and wrong, must be asked and settled first. The standards of ethics can be applied to all spheres of life, science, and study. Clark states that a very superficial impression would be that everyone agrees on what is right and wrong. That is hardly the case. He gives an example of theft, and states that one source of disagreement lies in the difficulty of knowing what the definition of theft is. Contrary to popular and naïve opinions, it is very difficult to define theft. Theft and murder, for instance, have been regarded as legitimate political procedure. Clark studies several examples of theories that attempt to explain the basis of morality. One is teleological ethics, which basically states that a moral value of an act depends on its purpose and consequences. Clark demonstrates several objections to this view, and moves on to egoism. Egoism defends morality by defining morality as that which by its efficacy obtains the individual s good. One should always seek his own ultimate good. However, most egoists have defined good as pleasure, and no two people can agree on what good is or pleasure is. Quite aside from the question of whether pleasure is really the supreme good in life is the question of definition of pleasure and what relation it has to human motives. Utilitarianism defines morality as what is good for the human race. The greatest good, or the greatest pleasure, for the greatest number defines this theory. However, this theory also fails. One could argue that the execution and torture of each member of an inferior race provides good or pleasure for millions, as 7

8 Hitler did. If utilitarianism is to commend itself above egoism, it must argue that an individual ought to sacrifice himself without hope of compensation for the greater pleasure of someone else. These forms of teleological ethics, Clark concludes, seem to be a complete failure. They do not give direction, and fail the crucial test of practical, concrete application. Clark then reviews the possibility of ateleological ethics, which states that the morality of an act cannot be determined by way of showing that it is an effective means to a good end. The morality of an act must be found in the act itself regardless of the consequences. This accords with popular opinion. That the end justifies the means is widely held to be an immoral principle. Some say the sphere of morality lies within us; it has to do with the will and not the consequences. Kant was one of the individuals that sought the test of morality not in the consequences but in the act itself. Again Clark refutes these theories and shows that they provide no actual guidance for the circumstances of life. Finally, Clark discusses the ethics of revelation. Biblical theism advances a theory of ethics that satisfies all the requirements. It provides adequate scope for selfinterest. Biblical theism gives specific guidance in the actual situations of life. Christianity escapes the difficulties of the other systems. Clark ends his discussion of ethics with a series of questions. If there is a God, we should expect to be driven on, for would not God so control the world that every factor would be related to every other factor? Would not politics depend on ethics, and would not ethics require some form of science and theology? 8

9 Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 5 Chapter five is a discussion on the philosophy of science. Science claims objectivity; no personal or emotional bias contributes to its results. Today, science is the final arbiter of many disputes, and it seems that science will be able to provide answers for any problem mankind can come up with. Clark quotes many scientists and philosophers that state that the goal of science is the complete interpretation o the universe. The scientific method is the sole gateway to the whole region of knowledge. Of course, Clark asks what experiment or what evidence is sufficient to prove that science is the sole gateway to all knowledge? Clark shows that scientific judgments are far from being absolute. The findings of science change constantly, and what was true yesterday may well be false tomorrow. Clark asserts and shows that science is all false, but is extremely useful. He demonstrates how scientific laws are not discovered, but chosen. A scientist chooses his law from among an infinite number of equally possible laws, the probability that he has chosen the true law is one over infinity, or zero. The scientist has no chance of hitting upon the real laws of nature. Clark shows that there is no science to which a final appeal can be made; there are only scientists and their various theories. Science of infallible law does not exist. Concepts of science change with their operations. Clark attempted to show that methods, as opposed to the results, of science are taken as the ultimately important matters, and scientists d not even agree on methods. Furthermore, all of these scientific observations are taken on faith. No scientific or observational proof can be given for the uniformity of 9

10 nature, and the scientific method cannot demonstrate that science is the sole gateway to knowledge. Clark asserts that nothing that comes out of observation can discredit the arguments of the previous chapters or motivate a choice against theism. Ethics and history do not depend on science, but science depends on them. 10

11 Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 6 Chapter 6 is Clark s discussion on the philosophy of religion. The problems of history, politics, and ethics, Clark has argued, require for their solution certain theistic presuppositions. All other philosophies have lead to inconsistencies, despair, or suicide. However, the fact that naturalism has proved intolerable does not prove theism. In this chapter Clark explores religion, and starts with the method. Clark explores the method of experience of determining a philosophy of religion, one based on empiricism, and soundly refutes this notion. Observation, experience, and sensory perception cannot take a finite creature to the infinite God. Empiricism cannot arrive at objectivity or universality. There is no rational process that leads from an individual s likes and dislikes, no matter how combined in sets or repeatedly verified in his experience, to the conclusion that he ought to like what he does, or to the wider conclusion that everybody out to like the same things. Clark states that attempts to define God and religion have been notoriously futile. The difficulty arises from the fact that there are many mutually contradictory religions; they may all be wrong, but only one of them can be true. The problem is to prove the existence of a Source of values, or better, as Clark states, since values may depend on man or physical nature, to determine whether there exists a personal, superhuman, Source of Values. Clark therefore examines the question of whether God can be known. Empiricism cannot reveal anything about God, Clark concludes. Man would know nothing about God unless God had revealed himself. Man can read neither the heavens nor his own heart correctly. 11

12 Clark asks, on the assumption that there is a God, and more particularly on the assumption that God exists as described in the Bible, what evidence could he give to man that he was God. It is inherent in the very nature of the case that the best witness to God s existence and revelation is God himself. There can be no higher source of truth. God has given us his revelation, and this is a first principle. Some things are first principles, that cannot be demonstrated. They are the basis or beginning of the argument. To require proof of a first principle is to misunderstand the whole procedure. Clark examines the nature of good and evil as a difficulty concerning the nature of God. However, al empirical theories of God and good and evil point to a finite god. Clark also examines the role of logic as an eternal attribute of God, and the laws of reason may be taken as descriptive of the activity of God s will, and hence dependent on it, though not created as the world has been created. Clark concludes by stating that on one basis and on one basis alone is it possible to have good hope for the future, and that basis in Almighty God. Anything limiting God, whether it be something external or an internal given chaos, makes the future uncertain. Any conclusion based on mere empirical observation makes the future both uncertain and dismal. But if the apparent evils, which are real evils to the people of the earthly city, are deliberately chosen means to the production of good for the people of the City of God, then it is possible to look at both the past and the future with equanimity, and with logical consistency. 12

13 Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 7 The last chapter is on a philosophy of knowledge. Clark examines skepticism, relativism, empiricism, and apriorism, and concludes with a theistic worldview. The question, how do we know, may seem simple enough, comments Clark, but the answer virtually controls the whole system of philosophy. A refusal to answer this question determines the outcome as completely as any positive answer. Skepticism, replies that we don t know anything. Knowledge is impossible. Clark reviews why people have adopted this conclusion, and refutes this philosophy. If one states that we cannot know anything, then do we know that statement? Clark reviews Augustine s answers to skepticism. Modern writers have adopted epistemological relativism that obscures the underlying difficulties of skepticism. If a statement is true only within a given culture, and if there are no eternal truths or unalterable objectivity, and if rational theories are only threadbare school exercises, then any theory itself is only a temporary phenomenon. If relativism is asserted universally, then its assertion contradicts what is being asserted. An absolutist relativism is a self-contradiction. If it is true, then it is false. Clark examines empiricism as an attempt to avoid skepticism. This philosophy is the method that derives al knowledge from sensory experience. But Clark argues that if all knowledge is based on experience, then there is no knowledge. Experience is different for every person. Time has never been impressed on the senses so that we might have an image of it. The idea of space is not abstracted from external sensations. Arithmetic cannot be abstracted from sensory experience. Physics and mathematics 13

14 require necessary and universal judgments, and these are impossible on an empirical basis. The validity of syllogistic reasoning can never be based on experience. Therefore, empiricism is conclusively shown to be skeptical, because the law of contradiction cannot be abstracted or obtained from temporally conditioned particulars. Clark concludes with a theistic view of the world. If skepticism is to be repudiated and if knowledge is a reality, then truth must exist. Knowledge requires an existing object, and that object is truth truth that always has and always will exist. Truth must be unchangeable. What is true today always has been and always will be true. The object of knowledge is a proposition, a meaning, a significance; it is a thought. The truths or propositions that may be known are the thoughts of God, the eternal thought of God. 14

Chapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1

Chapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 Chapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 In chapter 1, Clark reviews the purpose of Christian apologetics, and then proceeds to briefly review the failures of secular

More information

Chapter Summaries: Three Types of Religious Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1

Chapter Summaries: Three Types of Religious Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 Chapter Summaries: Three Types of Religious Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 In chapter 1, Clark begins by stating that this book will really not provide a definition of religion as such, except that it

More information

(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.

(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles. Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality?

More information

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #2 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 8-15. Matching and fill-in-the-blank questions

More information

CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics

CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics Sources: Baase: A Gift of Fire and Quinn: Ethics for the Information Age CS305-Spring 2010 Ethics 1 What is Ethics? A branch of philosophy that studies priciples relating

More information

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Ethics and Morality Ethics: greek ethos, study of morality What is Morality? Morality: system of rules for guiding

More information

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics

More information

THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström

THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström From: Who Owns Our Genes?, Proceedings of an international conference, October 1999, Tallin, Estonia, The Nordic Committee on Bioethics, 2000. THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström I shall be mainly

More information

CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND

CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND I. Five Alleged Problems with Theology and Science A. Allegedly, science shows there is no need to postulate a god. 1. Ancients used to think that you

More information

Phil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141

Phil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141 Phil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141 Dialectic: For Hegel, dialectic is a process governed by a principle of development, i.e., Reason

More information

Sidgwick on Practical Reason

Sidgwick on Practical Reason Sidgwick on Practical Reason ONORA O NEILL 1. How many methods? IN THE METHODS OF ETHICS Henry Sidgwick distinguishes three methods of ethics but (he claims) only two conceptions of practical reason. This

More information

Relativism and Subjectivism. The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards

Relativism and Subjectivism. The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards Relativism and Subjectivism The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards Starting with a counter argument 1.The universe operates according to laws 2.The universe can be investigated through the use of both

More information

Epistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?

Epistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything? Epistemology a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (Dictionary.com v 1.1). Epistemology attempts to answer the question how do we know what

More information

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;

More information

Ethics is subjective.

Ethics is subjective. Introduction Scientific Method and Research Ethics Ethical Theory Greg Bognar Stockholm University September 22, 2017 Ethics is subjective. If ethics is subjective, then moral claims are subjective in

More information

Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics.

Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics. PHI 110 Lecture 29 1 Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics. Last time we talked about the good will and Kant defined the good will as the free rational will which acts

More information

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 5 points).

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 5 points). HU2700 Spring 2008 Midterm Exam Answer Key There are two sections: a short answer section worth 25 points and an essay section worth 75 points. No materials (books, notes, outlines, fellow classmates,

More information

Philosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories

Philosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories Philosophical Ethics Distinctions and Categories Ethics Remember we have discussed how ethics fits into philosophy We have also, as a 1 st approximation, defined ethics as philosophical thinking about

More information

An Introduction to Ethics / Moral Philosophy

An Introduction to Ethics / Moral Philosophy An Introduction to Ethics / Moral Philosophy Ethics / moral philosophy is concerned with what is good for individuals and society and is also described as moral philosophy. The term is derived from the

More information

Cartesian Rationalism

Cartesian Rationalism Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he

More information

The Advancement: A Book Review

The Advancement: A Book Review From the SelectedWorks of Gary E. Silvers Ph.D. 2014 The Advancement: A Book Review Gary E. Silvers, Ph.D. Available at: https://works.bepress.com/dr_gary_silvers/2/ The Advancement: Keeping the Faith

More information

Ayer and Quine on the a priori

Ayer and Quine on the a priori Ayer and Quine on the a priori November 23, 2004 1 The problem of a priori knowledge Ayer s book is a defense of a thoroughgoing empiricism, not only about what is required for a belief to be justified

More information

Jeu-Jenq Yuann Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University,

Jeu-Jenq Yuann Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University, The Negative Role of Empirical Stimulus in Theory Change: W. V. Quine and P. Feyerabend Jeu-Jenq Yuann Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University, 1 To all Participants

More information

Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori

Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2

More information

In Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006

In Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006 In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

More information

A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES

A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES CHANHYU LEE Emory University It seems somewhat obscure that there is a concrete connection between epistemology and ethics; a study of knowledge and a study of moral

More information

A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo

A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo "Education is nothing more nor less than learning to think." Peter Facione In this article I review the historical evolution of principles and

More information

Augustine, On Free Choice of the Will,

Augustine, On Free Choice of the Will, Augustine, On Free Choice of the Will, 2.3-2.15 (or, How the existence of Truth entails that God exists) Introduction: In this chapter, Augustine and Evodius begin with three questions: (1) How is it manifest

More information

Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies

Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment

More information

Class #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism

Class #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism Philosophy 405: Knowledge, Truth and Mathematics Fall 2010 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism I. The Continuum Hypothesis and Its Independence The continuum problem

More information

Positivism A Model Of For System Of Rules

Positivism A Model Of For System Of Rules Positivism A Model Of For System Of Rules Positivism is a model of and for a system of rules, and its central notion of a single fundamental test for law forces us to miss the important standards that

More information

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories

More information

Kant and his Successors

Kant and his Successors Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics

More information

Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View

Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319532363 Carlo Cellucci Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View 1 Preface From its very beginning, philosophy has been viewed as aimed at knowledge and methods to

More information

Christian Evidences. The Verification of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 06 of 12

Christian Evidences. The Verification of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 06 of 12 Christian Evidences CA312 LESSON 06 of 12 Victor M. Matthews, STD Former Professor of Systematic Theology Grand Rapids Theological Seminary This is lecture 6 of the course entitled Christian Evidences.

More information

The Rightness Error: An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism

The Rightness Error: An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism Mathais Sarrazin J.L. Mackie s Error Theory postulates that all normative claims are false. It does this based upon his denial of moral

More information

2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature

2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature Introduction The philosophical controversy about free will and determinism is perennial. Like many perennial controversies, this one involves a tangle of distinct but closely related issues. Thus, the

More information

Are Miracles Identifiable?

Are Miracles Identifiable? Are Miracles Identifiable? 1. Some naturalists argue that no matter how unusual an event is it cannot be identified as a miracle. 1. If this argument is valid, it has serious implications for those who

More information

Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God

Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God Father Frederick C. Copleston (Jesuit Catholic priest) versus Bertrand Russell (agnostic philosopher) Copleston:

More information

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an opponent of utilitarianism. Basic Summary: Kant, unlike Mill, believed that certain types of actions (including murder,

More information

THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS. bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science

THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS. bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science WHY A WORKSHOP ON FAITH AND SCIENCE? The cultural divide between people of faith and people of science*

More information

Rule-Following and the Ontology of the Mind Abstract The problem of rule-following

Rule-Following and the Ontology of the Mind Abstract The problem of rule-following Rule-Following and the Ontology of the Mind Michael Esfeld (published in Uwe Meixner and Peter Simons (eds.): Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age. Papers of the 22nd International Wittgenstein Symposium.

More information

Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000)

Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000) Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000) One of the advantages traditionally claimed for direct realist theories of perception over indirect realist theories is that the

More information

Introduction to Philosophy

Introduction to Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy As soon as Sophie had closed the gate behind her she opened the envelope. It contained only a slip of paper no bigger than envelope. It read: Who are you? Nothing else, only

More information

To link to this article:

To link to this article: This article was downloaded by: [University of Chicago Library] On: 24 May 2013, At: 08:10 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office:

More information

Man and the Presence of Evil in Christian and Platonic Doctrine by Philip Sherrard

Man and the Presence of Evil in Christian and Platonic Doctrine by Philip Sherrard Man and the Presence of Evil in Christian and Platonic Doctrine by Philip Sherrard Source: Studies in Comparative Religion, Vol. 2, No.1. World Wisdom, Inc. www.studiesincomparativereligion.com OF the

More information

Introduction. A. The Myths of the Modern Mindset. Prayer

Introduction. A. The Myths of the Modern Mindset. Prayer Class #2: Thinking God's Thoughts: Philosophy of Special Revelation Shoring up the Foundation: Biblical Authority in an Age that Questions Everything 9/30/2012 Introduction Prayer Q1: Isn't accepting the

More information

AKC Lecture 1 Plato, Penrose, Popper

AKC Lecture 1 Plato, Penrose, Popper AKC Lecture 1 Plato, Penrose, Popper E. Brian Davies King s College London November 2011 E.B. Davies (KCL) AKC 1 November 2011 1 / 26 Introduction The problem with philosophical and religious questions

More information

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6 SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6 Textbook: Louis P. Pojman, Editor. Philosophy: The quest for truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 0199697310; ISBN-13: 9780199697311 (6th Edition)

More information

Thomas Aquinas on the World s Duration. Summa Theologiae Ia Q46: The Beginning of the Duration of Created Things

Thomas Aquinas on the World s Duration. Summa Theologiae Ia Q46: The Beginning of the Duration of Created Things Thomas Aquinas on the World s Duration Thomas Aquinas (1224/1226 1274) was a prolific philosopher and theologian. His exposition of Aristotle s philosophy and his views concerning matters central to the

More information

Delton Lewis Scudder: Tennant's Philosophical Theology. New Haven: Yale University Press xiv, 278. $3.00.

Delton Lewis Scudder: Tennant's Philosophical Theology. New Haven: Yale University Press xiv, 278. $3.00. [1941. Review of Tennant s Philosophical Theology, by Delton Lewis Scudder. Westminster Theological Journal.] Delton Lewis Scudder: Tennant's Philosophical Theology. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1940.

More information

COPLESTON: Quite so, but I regard the metaphysical argument as probative, but there we differ.

COPLESTON: Quite so, but I regard the metaphysical argument as probative, but there we differ. THE MORAL ARGUMENT RUSSELL: But aren't you now saying in effect, I mean by God whatever is good or the sum total of what is good -- the system of what is good, and, therefore, when a young man loves anything

More information

James Rachels. Ethical Egoism

James Rachels. Ethical Egoism James Rachels Ethical Egoism Psychological Egoism Ethical Egoism n Psychological Egoism: n Ethical Egoism: An empirical (descriptive) theory A normative (prescriptive) theory A theory about what in fact

More information

Christian View of Government and Law

Christian View of Government and Law Christian View of Government and Law Kerby Anderson helps us develop a biblically based, Christian view of both government and the laws it enforces. Understanding that the New Testament does not direct

More information

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology 1. Introduction Ryan C. Smith Philosophy 125W- Final Paper April 24, 2010 Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology Throughout this paper, the goal will be to accomplish three

More information

Categorical Imperative by. Kant

Categorical Imperative by. Kant Categorical Imperative by Dr. Desh Raj Sirswal Assistant Professor (Philosophy), P.G.Govt. College for Girls, Sector-11, Chandigarh http://drsirswal.webs.com Kant Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant (1724 1804)

More information

Moral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary

Moral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,

More information

Ideas Have Consequences

Ideas Have Consequences Introduction Our interest in this series is whether God can be known or not and, if he does exist and is knowable, then how may we truly know him and to what degree. We summarized the debate over God s

More information

Personal Identity Paper. Author: Marty Green, Student # Submitted to Prof. Laurelyn Cantor in partial

Personal Identity Paper. Author: Marty Green, Student # Submitted to Prof. Laurelyn Cantor in partial Personal Identity Paper Author: Marty Green, Student #1057942 Submitted to Prof. Laurelyn Cantor in partial fulfillment of the requirements of EDUA 2530 152 Introduction to Special Education. PERSONAL

More information

World-Wide Ethics. Chapter One. Individual Subjectivism

World-Wide Ethics. Chapter One. Individual Subjectivism World-Wide Ethics Chapter One Individual Subjectivism To some people it seems very enlightened to think that in areas like morality, and in values generally, everyone must find their own truths. Most of

More information

Critique of Cosmological Argument

Critique of Cosmological Argument David Hume: Critique of Cosmological Argument Critique of Cosmological Argument DAVID HUME (1711-1776) David Hume is one of the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Born in Edinburgh,

More information

The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle

The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle This paper is dedicated to my unforgettable friend Boris Isaevich Lamdon. The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle The essence of formal logic The aim of every science is to discover the laws

More information

Words and their Meaning

Words and their Meaning LESSON 2 OF 23 James M. Grier, Th.D. Distinguished Professor of Philosophical Theology at Grand Rapids Theological Seminary in Grand Rapids, Michigan WE503 Christian Ethics: A Biblical Theology of Morality

More information

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics

More information

EPISTEMOLOGY for DUMMIES

EPISTEMOLOGY for DUMMIES EPISTEMOLOGY for DUMMIES Cary Cook 2008 Epistemology doesn t help us know much more than we would have known if we had never heard of it. But it does force us to admit that we don t know some of the things

More information

DEALING WITH THE ALLEGED CONTRADICTIONS

DEALING WITH THE ALLEGED CONTRADICTIONS Apologetics Series; Lesson 2 i / Eastside Pittsburgh Church / 10/12/14 Scripture Reading: 2 Peter 3:10-18 Perhaps the most frequently cited reason why individuals reject the Bible s claim of inspiration

More information

Skepticism is True. Abraham Meidan

Skepticism is True. Abraham Meidan Skepticism is True Abraham Meidan Skepticism is True Copyright 2004 Abraham Meidan All rights reserved. Universal Publishers Boca Raton, Florida USA 2004 ISBN: 1-58112-504-6 www.universal-publishers.com

More information

Introduction to Deductive and Inductive Thinking 2017

Introduction to Deductive and Inductive Thinking 2017 Topic 1: READING AND INTERVENING by Ian Hawkins. Introductory i The Philosophy of Natural Science 1. CONCEPTS OF REALITY? 1.1 What? 1.2 How? 1.3 Why? 1.4 Understand various views. 4. Reality comprises

More information

The view that all of our actions are done in self-interest is called psychological egoism.

The view that all of our actions are done in self-interest is called psychological egoism. Egoism For the last two classes, we have been discussing the question of whether any actions are really objectively right or wrong, independently of the standards of any person or group, and whether any

More information

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers Diagram and evaluate each of the following arguments. Arguments with Definitional Premises Altruism. Altruism is the practice of doing something solely because

More information

Difference between Science and Religion? - A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding

Difference between Science and Religion? - A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding Scientific God Journal November 2012 Volume 3 Issue 10 pp. 955-960 955 Difference between Science and Religion? - A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding Essay Elemér E. Rosinger 1 Department of

More information

Postmodernism. Issue Christianity Post-Modernism. Theology Trinitarian Atheism. Philosophy Supernaturalism Anti-Realism

Postmodernism. Issue Christianity Post-Modernism. Theology Trinitarian Atheism. Philosophy Supernaturalism Anti-Realism Postmodernism Issue Christianity Post-Modernism Theology Trinitarian Atheism Philosophy Supernaturalism Anti-Realism (Faith and Reason) Ethics Moral Absolutes Cultural Relativism Biology Creationism Punctuated

More information

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating

More information

-- did you get a message welcoming you to the cours reflector? If not, please correct what s needed.

-- did you get a message welcoming you to the cours reflector? If not, please correct what s needed. 1 -- did you get a message welcoming you to the coursemail reflector? If not, please correct what s needed. 2 -- don t use secondary material from the web, as its quality is variable; cf. Wikipedia. Check

More information

Are Humans Always Selfish? OR Is Altruism Possible?

Are Humans Always Selfish? OR Is Altruism Possible? Are Humans Always Selfish? OR Is Altruism Possible? This debate concerns the question as to whether all human actions are selfish actions or whether some human actions are done specifically to benefit

More information

The Sea-Fight Tomorrow by Aristotle

The Sea-Fight Tomorrow by Aristotle The Sea-Fight Tomorrow by Aristotle Aristotle, Antiquities Project About the author.... Aristotle (384-322) studied for twenty years at Plato s Academy in Athens. Following Plato s death, Aristotle left

More information

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.

More information

WHY RELATIVISM IS NOT SELF-REFUTING IN ANY INTERESTING WAY

WHY RELATIVISM IS NOT SELF-REFUTING IN ANY INTERESTING WAY Preliminary draft, WHY RELATIVISM IS NOT SELF-REFUTING IN ANY INTERESTING WAY Is relativism really self-refuting? This paper takes a look at some frequently used arguments and its preliminary answer to

More information

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated

More information

Phil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?

Phil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science? Phil 1103 Review Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science? 1. Copernican Revolution Students should be familiar with the basic historical facts of the Copernican revolution.

More information

THE FREEDOM OF THE WILL By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781)

THE FREEDOM OF THE WILL By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) THE FREEDOM OF THE WILL By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) From: A447/B475 A451/B479 Freedom independence of the laws of nature is certainly a deliverance from restraint, but it is also

More information

A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena

A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena 2017 by A Jacob W. Reinhardt, All Rights Reserved. Copyright holder grants permission to reduplicate article as long as it is not changed. Send further requests to

More information

Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014

Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?

More information

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method Professor Tim Mazzarol UWA Business School MGMT6791 UWA Business School DBA Program tim.mazzarol@uwa.edu.au

More information

Critical Thinking: Present, Past and Future 5 April, 2015

Critical Thinking: Present, Past and Future 5 April, 2015 Critical Thinking: Present, Past and Future 5 April, 2015 V1 1 Critical Thinking: Present, Past & Future Milo Schield Augsburg College April 5, 2015 St. Paul Critical Thinking Club www.statlit.org/pdf/2015-schield-ctc-slides1.pdf

More information

Law and Authority. An unjust law is not a law

Law and Authority. An unjust law is not a law Law and Authority An unjust law is not a law The statement an unjust law is not a law is often treated as a summary of how natural law theorists approach the question of whether a law is valid or not.

More information

Cartesian Rationalism

Cartesian Rationalism Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he

More information

Difference between Science and Religion? A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding...

Difference between Science and Religion? A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding... Difference between Science and Religion? A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding... Elemér E Rosinger Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics University of Pretoria Pretoria 0002 South

More information

Teleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?

Teleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation? 1. Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 2. Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?

More information

15 Does God have a Nature?

15 Does God have a Nature? 15 Does God have a Nature? 15.1 Plantinga s Question So far I have argued for a theory of creation and the use of mathematical ways of thinking that help us to locate God. The question becomes how can

More information

DISCUSSION PRACTICAL POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY: A NOTE

DISCUSSION PRACTICAL POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY: A NOTE Practical Politics and Philosophical Inquiry: A Note Author(s): Dale Hall and Tariq Modood Reviewed work(s): Source: The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 117 (Oct., 1979), pp. 340-344 Published by:

More information

Ethical non-naturalism

Ethical non-naturalism Michael Lacewing Ethical non-naturalism Ethical non-naturalism is usually understood as a form of cognitivist moral realism. So we first need to understand what cognitivism and moral realism is before

More information

Has Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?

Has Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics? International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 7714 Volume 3 Issue 11 ǁ November. 2014 ǁ PP.38-42 Has Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?

More information

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 2017/18 Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,

More information

A Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke

A Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke A Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke Roghieh Tamimi and R. P. Singh Center for philosophy, Social Science School, Jawaharlal Nehru University,

More information

Chapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363)

Chapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363) Chapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363) Moral reasoning (p. 364) Value-judgements Some people argue that moral values are just reflections of personal taste. For example, I don t like spinach is

More information

Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination

Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination MP_C13.qxd 11/23/06 2:29 AM Page 110 13 Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination [Article IV. Concerning Henry s Conclusion] In the fourth article I argue against the conclusion of [Henry s] view as follows:

More information

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. Citation: 21 Isr. L. Rev. 113 1986 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Sun Jan 11 12:34:09 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's

More information

On The Logical Status of Dialectic (*) -Historical Development of the Argument in Japan- Shigeo Nagai Naoki Takato

On The Logical Status of Dialectic (*) -Historical Development of the Argument in Japan- Shigeo Nagai Naoki Takato On The Logical Status of Dialectic (*) -Historical Development of the Argument in Japan- Shigeo Nagai Naoki Takato 1 The term "logic" seems to be used in two different ways. One is in its narrow sense;

More information

Philosophy & Religion

Philosophy & Religion Philosophy & Religion What did philosophers say about religion/god? Kongfuzi (Confucius) - Chinese philosopher - secular humanism. Role of free will and choice in moral decision making. Aristotle - golden

More information