Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 4b Free Will/Self
|
|
- Duane Hampton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 4b Free Will/Self
2 The unobservability of the self David Hume, the Scottish empiricist we met in connection with his critique of Descartes method of doubt, is very skeptical of the notion of a self. His argument (p.122) is just that the self is unobservable. When we introspect the only thing we can become aware of is some experience or other. We are never aware of some I that is some how the bearer of all those experiences.
3 Empiricism Hume s argument is typical of classical empiricism: if you can t see (or, more generally, sense), it doesn t exist. But this argument against the self is actually a very poor one for the 21 st century. The reason is very simply that today we acknowledge all sort of things that are beyond sensation. If we only believed in what we can see in touch, then we would have to regard virtually of the phenomena of contemporary science (molecules, atoms, subatomic particles, charges, forces, electromagnetic radiation, dark matter, black holes, etc.) as fictions.
4 David Hume did not believe in the soul because A. Hume was a rationalist and the soul can not be rationally proven. B. Hume was an empiricist, and he did not think that the soul was observable. C. Hume was a determinist and was skeptical that a soul could be free. D. Hume actually did believe in a soul.
5 The self and morality Like free will, the idea of a persisting self is central to our moral intuitions. Basically, the idea here is that holding people responsible for things over time requires the assumption that they are the same people over time. In fact, we often do here arguments that someone should not be held responsible for something he did 20 years ago, because he is really not even the same person.
6 The simplicity of the self Philosophers like Thomas Reid (a contemporary of Hume) have insisted that the self is not only real, but indivisible. (p.123). The point here is that we really can t identify the self with our body or some part of our body, because our body can be theoretically chopped up into little pieces. And it s silly to suggest that each little piece would be entitled to it s share of the estate or be held responsible for it s share of the harm done by the entire body.
7 Simplicity and immortality As Blackburn points out (p.124) there is an interesting connection between the assumption of simplicity, and immortality. Dying, after all, is just a form of change. But the only kinds of things that can change are things that have parts. So if Reid is right that the self is simple, then it cannot change, which means that it must be immortal.
8 Thomas Reid believed that the self is simple because A. simple things are easier to understand. B. the self is indivisible, and only simple things are indivisible. C. the self is immaterial and only immaterial things are indivisible. D. non simple things can not transfer their properties through epicyclic parameters.
9 Locke s on identity I John Locke had some of the most interesting insights into identity. He approached the question of personal identity for human beings by asking first what is the basis of identity for non human beings. His answer is interesting. Locke asks us to consider an oak tree from it s birth as an acorn to it s death 350 years later when it topples in a storm. We are inclined to say that it is the same tree the entire time, but obviously it changes dramatically in physical terms. According to Locke, the oak is not the thing you see before you at any given time. The oak is that physical process through time. Locke says that it continues to be the same oak insofar as it partakes in the same life.
10 Locke on identity II Locke s view has relevance for our understanding of human beings as well. Even though science can not countenance the existence of souls, it is not thereby committed to the idea that your are merely an assemblage of particles. Like the oak you are a functional unity. At any given moment we see only a very small part of you. The real you is not an immaterial object, for the simple reason that you are not an object at all. Human beings, like oaks, are processes through time. This way of looking at living things gives Locke a nice way of saying what it means to be the same being over time. Specifically, to be the same being is simply to be participating in the same process. Growth and change do not undermine identity as long as the functional organization remains.
11 Locke believed that since human beings are not made of the same physical stuff through time they are not self-identical through time. A. True B. False
12 The Ship of Theseus The Ship of Theseus (or Neurath) is an excellent story for dialing in the problem of characterizing a functional entity in terms of what it s made of. Imagine that Theseus (legendary King of Athens) sails his ship on a voyage so long that every part on the ship is replaced due to wear and tear. When he returns to port, is it the same ship? Now add to this the assumption that someone is following the ship throughout it s voyage and gathering all the discarded parts. He assembles them into their original form. Now who has the Ship of Theseus? Locke s answer is straightforward. The true Ship of Theseus is the one that Theseus returned on. This is not because Theseus returned on it, but because the ship is not what it is made of, but the entire temporal process by which it s functional integrity is maintained.
13 Locke s critique of the immaterial soul Locke has established that ships, oaks, and animals can remain self-identical despite having all their matter replaced. This gives him an interesting basis for criticizing the view that human self-identity is due to a single, simple immaterial soul. His point is extremely interesting (p. 128) : Even if we accept the idea of an immaterial soul, how do we know that a single, simple self-identical substance persists through time?
14 Locke s question elaborated Remember, Locke has just shown us that a being can be identified with a physical process, where the actual matter is constantly in flux. So, why couldn t a soul just be an analogous immaterial process, where the soul stuff is constantly in flux?
15 Kant s elastic balls The German philosopher Kant imagines a different possibility (p. 129) using an analogy with perfectly elastic balls. We know, he says, that when one rolling ball hits another stationery one, it imparts it s momentum to it. How do we know that the self isn t like this? Why couldn t it be that during your lifetime a multiplicity of immaterial substances is simply transferring the contents of your consciousness from one to the other in the way that elastic balls transfer their momentum? Self 1 Self 2 Self 3 Self 4
16 Argument from ignorance redux Recall Schopenhauer s powerful point that our belief in freedom is largely the result of our ignorance of the causes of our actions. Kant s point is very similar. As Blackburn emphasizes, we assume that the self is simple because that s the way it appears from within. But for all we know our immaterial substance (if there is any such thing) gets replaced every night with a new one that has all our memories and experiences recorded on it.
17 Both Kant and Locke believed that the self is due to a single immaterial substance persisting through time. A. True B. False
18 Human beings vs. persons. Interestingly, Locke held that the criteria of identity he developed for oaks and human beings (partaking in the same life) is not sufficient for persons. For Locke, a person is "...a thinking, intelligent being, that has reason and reflection, and can consider itself as itself, the same thinking thing, in different times and different places." In other words, a human being is a person to the extent that it is self-conscious, able to reflect on its memories and experiences.
19 The prince and the cobbler Although Blackburn does not discuss it here, Locke arrives at his criterion of identity for persons through a thought experiment. He asks us to imagine a prince and a cobbler who exchange souls in their sleep. Hence, the body of the cobbler wakes up in a hovel with all the memories of a prince, and the body of a prince wakes up in castle with all the memories of a cobbler. Locke thinks it is obvious that the cobbler as human being is still in the hovel, but the cobbler as person is now living in a castle and in a prince s body. Hence, Locke argues that the criterion of identity for persons is not a function of it s physical nature, but of its consciousness. To be the same person through time is to possessed of the same memories.
20 Locke s motivation As a Christian, Locke believes in a soul that survives bodily death; but as a scientist and a philosopher he knew that there is no way to know the soul of another man. Hence, while he puts the thought experiment in terms of changing souls, he does not see personal identity in terms of the soul at all. Part of what Locke was concerned about here is the nature of just punishment. He believed (very controversially for the time) that it isn t just to punish someone for a crime she can t remember committing. Locke s thought experiment allows him to put his objection in the strongest possible terms: If the person doesn t remember committing the, then the person didn t do it, even if his body did.
21 Problems for Locke Locke s view was groundbreaking, but also highly problematic since it really can not preserve the idea that we are the same person over time. The reason is just that from birth to death we forget a lot of stuff. There are all sorts of things you could remember when you were 10 years old that you can t remember at all now. For example, on March 27 th 1998 you probably could have told me what you had for breakfast the previous morning, but now you ve probably forgotten. It s not clear that this result bothered Locke that much. He may have been happy to conclude that while we are pretty much the same person from day to day, we aren t really the same person from decade to decade.
22 Locke s view implies that you are the same human being from birth to death, but not that you are the same person. A. True B. False
23 Reid s critique Thomas Reid (p ) made a famous criticism of Locke view with a thought experiment about an officer in the military. Essentially he asked us to imagine this man as a young boy, a military officer, and as an old general. Call these times A, B, and C respectively. He asks us to imagine the following things to be true of A, B, and C A: The boy is flogged at school. B: The officer captures the enemy s flag in battle. At this time, he can still remember when he was flogged in school. C: The old general still remembers capturing the flag, but has no memory of the flogging. Reid points out that Locke s view implies that A=B and B=C, but A C. This is a problem because it violates the the transitivity of identity.
24 Locke s defense Reid s criticism seems crushing, but there is a fairly simple response to it. Locke can point out that in the real world (as opposed to the purely mathematical one) whether a thing is the same over a certain period of time is going to be somewhat stipulative. Blackburn asks us to imagine a law that givestheseus a tax break on his ship as long as it remains physically identical to the one he bought. The government stipulates that the ship is the same at two different points in time A and B, just in case 55% of the physical material is the same. This will also fail transitivity. Suppose: A= newly purchased ship. B= 10 years old, 40% of original material replaced. C= 15 years old, 60% of original material replaced. So again, A = B, B = C, but A C. But who cares? This is not really a mathematical or metaphysical identity, it is just identity for practical legal purposes. Locke s theory of identity has the same defense. It is identity for practical/moral purposes.
25 Hume s bundle theory of the self As we saw earlier, Hume argued that the self, considered as a simple entity that owns perceptions and experiences is unobservable, and that we should be skeptical of it s existence. It is often said that Hume subscribed to a different view of the self, namely that it is not the owner of our perceptions, but simply the collection or bundle of perceptions itself. That s one way of putting Hume s view. The other way of putting it, perhaps more charitable, is that Hume didn t believe in a self at all. Hume s view of the self is actually strikingly like the Buddhist view, according to which a persisting self is the fundamental illusion, responsible for almost all human striving and, ultimately, suffering.
26 Kant s critique of Hume The main problem with Hume s view is that it is very difficult for us to make sense of perceptions that don t have an owner. As Blackburn points out, imagining a perception without a perceiver is like trying to imagine a dent without a surface, or a smile without a face. Kant puts the point this way. Hume is right that the self is unobservable, and right to reject the self as a simple, immaterial entity that collects experiences in some way that is completely beyond empirical examination. But Hume is wrong to conclude that the term I refers only to a particular bundle of perceptions. In some ways this shows that Hume himself can t quite get beyond thinking of the self as a kind of thing. Kant claims that the word I does not refer to a particular thing at all. Rather, it is the expression of a particular point of view.
27 The self as an organizing principle One way to see what Kant is saying is to adopt what we now sometimes call the design stance. What would it be like to design a robot that had some minimal form of selfconsciousness? Focusing on visual experience, Blackburn imagines a robot fitted with a camera. The robot can record visual images on a screen, and in this sense a bundle of perceptions is present. But these perceptions are not of any real use to the robot at this point, because it has no way of knowing what it is looking at. For example, if a round shape is moving across the screen, it does not know whether it is looking at something small moving slowly nearby, or something larger moving more quickly far away, or even whether the shape itself is moving, rather that the robot. The point here is that the bundle of perceptions is not at all useful to the robot unless it has a set of rules for interpreting their significance with respect to it.
28 The self as an organizing principle 2 In other words, ideas like near, distant, left, right, above, below, before, behind, big, little, fast, slow, etc. all express relations to a particular observer. These relations express the observer s point of view, and they need to be determined in order for the observer to know how to respond appropriately to it s perceptions. So the idea here is that anytime we refer to an I we are not referring to some kind of immaterial substance, or something we could discover in experience, but rather to the set of principles that tells us how to use these experiences to represent the environment from our particular perspective.
29 Other points of view If a simple robot like the one described is outfitted with a set of organizing principles it will have a point of view, though it won t actually know it has a point of view; i.e., it will have a self, but it won t actually be self-conscious. Self-consciousness is partly the recognition that our own point of view can be different from others; because of your particular circumstances you perceive an environment we both occupy differently that I do. Blackburn suggests that it is this ability to look at things from another person s point of view that gives rise to certain delusion, such as that we might survive bodily death. For example, because you can imagine different points of view, you have the capacity to imagine what it would be like to be at your own funeral. For example, you can imagine seeing your body in a coffin, and it is very natural to describe this activity as your self seeing your body in a coffin. Or you can imagine living in a different place or time, which you naturally describe as imagining your self living at a different place or time. Blackburn s point here is just that using the underlined expression doesn t add any content. But it can make us believe in an imaginary object.
30 Duplicating the soul Today philosophers sometimes like to imagine more sophisticated versions of Locke s thought experiment about the Prince and the Cobbler. For example, suppose that we were able to simply upload all of your memories, experiences, skills and aptitudes into the body of another person who looked just like you. When the upload is complete, there will be two different individuals with the same consciousness. If we could do this, Locke would have to say (at least at the moment of creation) that two completely different human beings are actually the same person. Taking Locke s view seriously in legal and moral terms is going to make things pretty awkward, as it implies that you both own the same car, both have the same marital obligations, etc.
31 Duplicating the soul 2 These thought experiments can also be very confusing. For example, suppose you woke up in the hospital this morning feeling fantastic, but not knowing how you got there. The doctor tells you that you were in a horrible accident the night before. They weren t able to save your body, but they were able to copy all of the contents of your brain and upload it into another brain inside a body just like yours, though with none of it s previous defects. Seems like on the whole you d find this situation to be pretty agreeable. On the other hand, suppose exactly the same transfer as above occurs against your will, with the exception that you were not in a horrible accident at all. You wake up to be told that all of the contents of your brain have been uploaded to a new improved body, and that in a few hours they will go ahead and put you to sleep for good. Seems like on the whole you d find this situation pretty disagreeable.
32 Past vs. Future As Blackburn points out, our intuitions about the significance of these outcomes are very different depending on whether we are looking to the future, or looking back at the past. In the first example, looking to the past, you are the surviving improved self, and you are the same person only with an improved body. It s great. In the second example, looking to the future, your are going to be killed so that some other being they say is really the same person as you can live. It totally sucks. But after you are gone, everyone else is just fine with it. Of course, we don t have the ability to perform these operations at this point, and maybe we never will. But these examples do seem to show that our simple notion of a determinate self that either persists fully intact through time, or else completely perishes can not be quite accurate.
Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 1b Knowledge
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 1b Knowledge According to A.C. Grayling, if cogito ergo sum is an argument, it is missing a premise. This premise is: A. Everything that exists thinks. B. Everything that
More informationClass #13 - The Consciousness Theory of the Self Locke, The Prince and the Cobbler Reid, Of Mr. Locke's Account of Our Personal Identity
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2012 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #13 - The Consciousness Theory of the Self Locke, The Prince and the Cobbler Reid, Of Mr. Locke's Account of
More informationLocke s Essay, Book II, Chapter 27: Of Identity and Diversity
Locke s Essay, Book II, Chapter 27: Of Identity and Diversity 1. Wherein identity consists In this section Locke is distinguishing two different kinds of identity: 1: Numerical identity (Fred is identical
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7b The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7b The World Kant s metaphysics rested on identifying a kind of truth that Hume and other did not acknowledge. It is called A. synthetic a priori B. analytic a priori C.
More informationDo you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014
Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationThomas Reid on personal identity
Thomas Reid on personal identity phil 20208 Jeff Speaks October 5, 2006 1 Identity and personal identity............................ 1 1.1 The conviction of personal identity..................... 1 1.2
More informationTeleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?
1. Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 2. Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationNigel Warburton Anthony Grayling, I wonder if you could say a little bit about personal identity as a philosophical problem.
Exploring Philosophy - Audio Personal identity Winifred In this section the course author,, is talking to A C Grayling, Professor of Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London., I wonder if you
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationNotes on Hume and Kant
Notes on Hume and Kant Daniel Bonevac, The University of Texas at Austin 1 Hume on Identity Hume, an empiricist, asks the question that his philosophical stance demands: nor have we any idea of self, after
More informationLocke s and Hume s Theories of Personhood: Similarities and Differences. In this paper I will deal with the theories of personhood formulated by
Student 1 Student s Name Instructor s Name Course 20 April 2011 Locke s and Hume s Theories of Personhood: Similarities and Differences In this paper I will deal with the theories of personhood formulated
More informationMind s Eye Idea Object
Do the ideas in our mind resemble the qualities in the objects that caused these ideas in our minds? Mind s Eye Idea Object Does this resemble this? In Locke s Terms Even if we accept that the ideas in
More informationHello. Welcome to what will be one of two lectures on John Locke s theories of
PHI 110 Lecture 4 1 Hello. Welcome to what will be one of two lectures on John Locke s theories of personhood and personal identity. The title I have for this lecture is Consciousness, Persons and Responsibility.
More informationMind and Body. Is mental really material?"
Mind and Body Is mental really material?" René Descartes (1596 1650) v 17th c. French philosopher and mathematician v Creator of the Cartesian co-ordinate system, and coinventor of algebra v Wrote Meditations
More informationDescartes to Early Psychology. Phil 255
Descartes to Early Psychology Phil 255 Descartes World View Rationalism: the view that a priori considerations could lay the foundations for human knowledge. (i.e. Think hard enough and you will be lead
More informationPersonal Identity Through Time
Personal Identity Through Time Personal Identity Given a person A at one time and a person B at a different time, what must be the case for A and B to be the same person? We connect a lot of things to
More informationGeorge Berkeley. The Principles of Human Knowledge. Review
George Berkeley The Principles of Human Knowledge Review To be is to be perceived Obvious to the Mind all those bodies which compose the earth have no subsistence without a mind, their being is to be perceived
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7c The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7c The World Idealism Despite the power of Berkeley s critique, his resulting metaphysical view is highly problematic. Essentially, Berkeley concludes that there is no
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth REVIEW: THREE
More information24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy
1 Plan: Kant Lecture #2: How are pure mathematics and pure natural science possible? 1. Review: Problem of Metaphysics 2. Kantian Commitments 3. Pure Mathematics 4. Transcendental Idealism 5. Pure Natural
More informationIntro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2
Intro to Philosophy Review for Exam 2 Epistemology Theory of Knowledge What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know
More information1/10. The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism
1/10 The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism The Fourth Paralogism is quite different from the three that preceded it because, although it is treated as a part of rational psychology, it main
More informationOf Skepticism with Regard to the Senses. David Hume
Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses David Hume General Points about Hume's Project The rationalist method used by Descartes cannot provide justification for any substantial, interesting claims about
More informationThe Critique of Berkeley and Hume. Sunday, April 19, 2015
The Critique of Berkeley and Hume George Berkeley (1685-1753) Idealism best defense of common sense against skepticism Descartes s and Locke s ideas of objects make no sense. Attack on primary qualities
More informationHume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge
Hume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge in class. Let my try one more time to make clear the ideas we discussed today Ideas and Impressions First off, Hume, like Descartes, Locke, and Berkeley, believes
More informationImportant dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )
PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since 1600 Dr. Peter Assmann Spring 2018 Important dates Feb 14 Term paper draft due Upload paper to E-Learning https://elearning.utdallas.edu
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth KNOWLEDGE:
More information! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.
! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! What is the relation between that knowledge and that given in the sciences?! Key figure: René
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7a The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7a The World What s real? This chapter basically concern the question: What is real? Of course, everything is real in some sense of the word. Your dreams, hallucinations,
More informationIntroductory Kant Seminar Lecture
Introductory Kant Seminar Lecture Intentionality It is not unusual to begin a discussion of Kant with a brief review of some history of philosophy. What is perhaps less usual is to start with a review
More informationDualism: What s at stake?
Dualism: What s at stake? Dualists posit that reality is comprised of two fundamental, irreducible types of stuff : Material and non-material Material Stuff: Includes all the familiar elements of the physical
More informationHume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Hume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017 / Philosophy 1 After Descartes The greatest success of the philosophy of Descartes was that it helped pave the way for the mathematical
More informationRationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt
Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 14: 2-22 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding b. Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between
More informationREFUTING THE EXTERNAL WORLD SAMPLE CHAPTER GÖRAN BACKLUND
REFUTING THE EXTERNAL WORLD SAMPLE CHAPTER GÖRAN BACKLUND 1.0.0.5 Copyright 2014 by Göran Backlund All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever
More informationLecture 18: Rationalism
Lecture 18: Rationalism I. INTRODUCTION A. Introduction Descartes notion of innate ideas is consistent with rationalism Rationalism is a view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification.
More informationThe Nature of Death. chapter 8. What Is Death?
chapter 8 The Nature of Death What Is Death? According to the physicalist, a person is just a body that is functioning in the right way, a body capable of thinking and feeling and communicating, loving
More informationToday we turn to the work of one of the most important, and also most difficult, philosophers: Immanuel Kant.
Kant s antinomies Today we turn to the work of one of the most important, and also most difficult, philosophers: Immanuel Kant. Kant was born in 1724 in Prussia, and his philosophical work has exerted
More informationLecture 7.1 Berkeley I
TOPIC: Lecture 7.1 Berkeley I Introduction to the Representational view of the mind. Berkeley s Argument from Illusion. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Idealism. Naive realism. Representations. Berkeley s Argument from
More informationReview Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
More informationEpistemology. Theory of Knowledge
Epistemology Theory of Knowledge Epistemological Questions What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know x? What
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 3e Free Will
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 3e Free Will The video Free Will and Neurology attempts to provide scientific evidence that A. our free will is the result of a single free will neuron. B. our sense that
More informationPersonal Identity and the Jehovah' s Witness View of the Resurrection
Personal Identity and the Jehovah' s Witness View of the Resurrection Steven B. Cowan Abstract: It is commonly known that the Watchtower Society (Jehovah's Witnesses) espouses a materialist view of human
More informationReid Against Skepticism
Thus we see, that Descartes and Locke take the road that leads to skepticism without knowing the end of it, but they stop short for want of light to carry them farther. Berkeley, frightened at the appearance
More informationEXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers
EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers Diagram and evaluate each of the following arguments. Arguments with Definitional Premises Altruism. Altruism is the practice of doing something solely because
More informationIII Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH
PHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH PCES 3.42 Even before Newton published his revolutionary work, philosophers had already been trying to come to grips with the questions
More informationSUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5)
SUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5) Introduction We often say things like 'I couldn't resist buying those trainers'. In saying this, we presumably mean that the desire to
More informationKant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge
Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge Statements involving necessity or strict universality could never be known on the basis of sense experience, and are thus known (if known at all) a priori.
More informationDennett's Reduction of Brentano's Intentionality
Dennett's Reduction of Brentano's Intentionality By BRENT SILBY Department of Philosophy University of Canterbury Copyright (c) Brent Silby 1998 www.def-logic.com/articles Since as far back as the middle
More informationFrom Brains in Vats.
From Brains in Vats. To God; And even to Myself, To a Malicious Demon; But, with I am, I exist (or Cogito ergo sum, i.e., I think therefore I am ), we have found the ultimate foundation. The place where
More informationToday we turn to the work of one of the most important, and also most difficult, philosophers: Immanuel Kant.
Kant s antinomies Today we turn to the work of one of the most important, and also most difficult, philosophers: Immanuel Kant. Kant was born in 1724 in Prussia, and his philosophical work has exerted
More informationExploring Philosophy - Audio Thought experiments
Exploring Philosophy - Audio Thought experiments Hello. Welcome to the audio for Book One of Exploring Philosophy, which is all about the self. First of all we are going to hear about a philosophical device
More informationNancey Murphy, Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006). Pp. x Hbk, Pbk.
Nancey Murphy, Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006). Pp. x +154. 33.25 Hbk, 12.99 Pbk. ISBN 0521676762. Nancey Murphy argues that Christians have nothing
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College. Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics Scepticism, and the Mind 2 Last Time we looked at scepticism about INDUCTION. This Lecture will move on to SCEPTICISM
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 3d Free Will
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 3d Free Will The video Free Will and Neurology attempts to provide scientific evidence that A. our free will is the result of a single free will neuron. B. our sense that
More informationG.E. Moore A Refutation of Skepticism
G.E. Moore A Refutation of Skepticism The Argument For Skepticism 1. If you do not know that you are not merely a brain in a vat, then you do not even know that you have hands. 2. You do not know that
More informationTo be able to define human nature and psychological egoism. To explain how our views of human nature influence our relationships with other
Velasquez, Philosophy TRACK 1: CHAPTER REVIEW CHAPTER 2: Human Nature 2.1: Why Does Your View of Human Nature Matter? Learning objectives: To be able to define human nature and psychological egoism To
More informationIS PERSONAL IDENTITY WHAT MATTERS?
IS PERSONAL IDENTITY WHAT MATTERS? by Derek Parfit 31 December 2007 In my book Reasons and Persons, I defended one view about the metaphysics of persons, and also claimed that personal identity is not
More informationReview of Constructive Empiricism: Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science
Review of Constructive Empiricism: Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science Constructive Empiricism (CE) quickly became famous for its immunity from the most devastating criticisms that brought down
More informationSkepticism is True. Abraham Meidan
Skepticism is True Abraham Meidan Skepticism is True Copyright 2004 Abraham Meidan All rights reserved. Universal Publishers Boca Raton, Florida USA 2004 ISBN: 1-58112-504-6 www.universal-publishers.com
More information1/8. Reid on Common Sense
1/8 Reid on Common Sense Thomas Reid s work An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense is self-consciously written in opposition to a lot of the principles that animated early modern
More informationKant s Copernican Revolution
Kant s Copernican Revolution While the thoughts are still fresh in my mind, let me try to pick up from where we left off in class today, and say a little bit more about Kant s claim that reason has insight
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 : N A T U R E O F R E A L I T Y
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 : N A T U R E O F R E A L I T Y AGENDA 1. Review of Personal Identity 2. The Stuff of Reality 3. Materialistic/Physicalism 4. Immaterial/Idealism PERSONAL IDENTITY
More informationThe British Empiricism
The British Empiricism Locke, Berkeley and Hume copyleft: nicolazuin.2018 nowxhere.wordpress.com The terrible heritage of Descartes: Skepticism, Empiricism, Rationalism The problem originates from the
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 D A Y 2 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 D A Y 2 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism
More informationKantian Realism. Jake Quilty-Dunn. Kantian Realism 75
Kantian Realism Kantian Realism 75 ant's claims that the objects of perception are appearances, "mere representations," and that we can never K perceive things in themselves, seem to mark him as some sort
More informationOf Identity and Diversity *
Of Identity and Diversity * John Locke 9. Personal Identity [T]o find wherein personal identity consists, we must consider what person stands for;- which, I think, is a thinking intelligent being, that
More informationFrom Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
More informationIs There an External World? George Stuart Fullerton
Is There an External World? George Stuart Fullerton HOW THE PLAIN MAN THINKS HE KNOWS THE WORLD As schoolboys we enjoyed Cicero s joke at the expense of the minute philosophers. They denied the immortality
More informationCommon sense dictates that we can know external reality exists and that it is generally correctly perceived via our five senses
Common sense dictates that we can know external reality exists and that it is generally correctly perceived via our five senses Mind Mind Body Mind Body [According to this view] the union [of body and
More informationIdealism. Contents EMPIRICISM. George Berkeley and Idealism. Preview: Hume. Idealism: other versions. Idealism: simplest definition
Contents EMPIRICISM PHIL3072, ANU, 2015 Jason Grossman http://empiricism.xeny.net preview & recap idealism Berkeley lecture 5: 11 August George Berkeley and Idealism Preview: Hume Not very original on
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 - D A Y 2 ( T / T H ) : E P I S T E M O L O G Y E M P I R I C I S M, R A T I O N A L I S M, M I D T E R M D I S C U S S I O N REVIEW: EPISTEMOLOGY How do We
More information1/8. Introduction to Kant: The Project of Critique
1/8 Introduction to Kant: The Project of Critique This course is focused on the interpretation of one book: The Critique of Pure Reason and we will, during the course, read the majority of the key sections
More informationGREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid ( ) Peter West 25/09/18
GREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid (1710-1796) Peter West 25/09/18 Some context Aristotle (384-322 BCE) Lucretius (c. 99-55 BCE) Thomas Reid (1710-1796 AD) 400 BCE 0 Much of (Western) scholastic philosophy
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 5d God
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 5d God No clickers today. 2 quizzes Wednesday. Don t be late or you will miss the first one! Turn in your Nammour summaries today. No credit for late ones. According to
More informationEpistemology and sensation
Cazeaux, C. (2016). Epistemology and sensation. In H. Miller (ed.), Sage Encyclopaedia of Theory in Psychology Volume 1, Thousand Oaks: Sage: 294 7. Epistemology and sensation Clive Cazeaux Sensation refers
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism (continued)
More informationUnit 2. WoK 1 - Perception. Tuesday, October 7, 14
Unit 2 WoK 1 - Perception Russell Reading - Appearance and Reality The Russell document provides a basic framework for looking at the limitations of our senses. In small groups, discuss and record what
More informationCONTENTS. CHAPTER 1. CHAPTER II. THE PROBLEM OF DESCARTES, -
CONTENTS. CHAPTER 1. THE PROBLEM OF DESCARTES, - Aristotle and Descartes, 1. Augustine's treatment of the problem of knowledge, 4. The advance from Augustine to Descartes, 10. The influence of the mathematical
More informationThe Soul in Locke, Butler, Reid, Hume, and Kant
Chapter 4 The Soul in Locke, Butler, Reid, Hume, and Kant In the Introduction to their book Naturalization of the Soul: Self and Personal Identity in the Eighteenth Century, Raymond Martin and John Barresi
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 3 February 11th, 2016 Harman, Ethics and Observation 1 (finishing up our All About Arguments discussion) A common theme linking many of the fallacies we covered is that
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationa0rxh/ On Van Inwagen s Argument Against the Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts WESLEY H. BRONSON Princeton University
a0rxh/ On Van Inwagen s Argument Against the Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts WESLEY H. BRONSON Princeton University Imagine you are looking at a pen. It has a blue ink cartridge inside, along with
More informationEpistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?
Epistemology a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (Dictionary.com v 1.1). Epistemology attempts to answer the question how do we know what
More information1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought
1/7 The Postulates of Empirical Thought This week we are focusing on the final section of the Analytic of Principles in which Kant schematizes the last set of categories. This set of categories are what
More informationWhat I am is what I am, Are you what you are, Or what?
What I am is what I am, Are you what you are, Or what? Minds and Bodies What am I, anyway? Can collections of atoms be the subjects of conscious mental states? The Big Question Mind and/or Matter? What
More informationJ O S H I A H
J O S H I A H www.joshiah.com Caveat: This document is a direct transcription from the original recording. Although it has been checked for obvious errors, it has not been finally edited. Editorial comments
More informationCriteria of Identity
Philosophy 100 Introduction to Philosophy Section 002 (Johns) Criteria of Identity We saw that, according to Locke, you can t just point at two people and ask whether they re the same one, as the question
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 2b Mind
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 2b Mind According to Blackburn, the argument from analogy to the existence of other minds: A. is only available to the Cartesian dualist. B. is not available to the Cartesian
More information- We might, now, wonder whether the resulting concept of justification is sufficiently strong. According to BonJour, apparent rational insight is
BonJour I PHIL410 BonJour s Moderate Rationalism - BonJour develops and defends a moderate form of Rationalism. - Rationalism, generally (as used here), is the view according to which the primary tool
More informationTHE EVOLUTION OF ABSTRACT INTELLIGENCE alexis dolgorukii 1998
THE EVOLUTION OF ABSTRACT INTELLIGENCE alexis dolgorukii 1998 In the past few years this is the subject about which I have been asked the most questions. This is true because it is the subject about which
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy: The Big Picture
Course Syllabus Introduction to Philosophy: The Big Picture Course Description This course will take you on an exciting adventure that covers more than 2,500 years of history! Along the way, you ll run
More informationRealism and its competitors. Scepticism, idealism, phenomenalism
Realism and its competitors Scepticism, idealism, phenomenalism Perceptual Subjectivism Bonjour gives the term perceptual subjectivism to the conclusion of the argument from illusion. Perceptual subjectivism
More informationEarly Modern Philosophy Locke and Berkeley. Lecture 3: Locke on Personal Identity
Early Modern Philosophy Locke and Berkeley Lecture 3: Locke on Personal Identity The plan for today 1. The logic of identity 2. The Lockean theory 3. The drunk student objection 4. The brave officer objection
More informationAyer s linguistic theory of the a priori
Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2
More informationKant & Transcendental Idealism
Kant & Transcendental Idealism HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 4 Empiricists and rationalists alike are dupes of the same illusion. Both take partial notions for real parts. -Henri Bergson Enlightenment
More informationWell-Being, Time, and Dementia. Jennifer Hawkins. University of Toronto
Well-Being, Time, and Dementia Jennifer Hawkins University of Toronto Philosophers often discuss what makes a life as a whole good. More significantly, it is sometimes assumed that beneficence, which is
More informationExcerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason
Excerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason In a letter to Moses Mendelssohn, Kant says this about the Critique of Pure Reason:
More information