Religious belief, hypothesis and attitudes
|
|
- Dorothy Lewis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Michael Lacewing Religious belief, hypothesis and attitudes THE STATUS OF THE RELIGIOUS HYPOTHESIS A hypothesis is a proposal that needs to be tested (and confirmed or rejected) by experience. We use experience to infer its truth or falsehood; its truth is not something that we can experience directly. The religious hypothesis is that God exists. Is this a hypothesis? When we test a scientific hypothesis, we look for experiences that will show that it is true or false. If God exists is an empirical hypothesis, a statement of fact, then it must be possible to imagine the conditions under which we would say that it was not a fact. For example, the theory of evolution by natural selection is a hypothesis; if aliens came to Earth and demonstrated that they had planted fossils (which actually they had made) for us to find, we would give up the theory. What would make us give up the claim that God exists? We can argue that there are no tests of this kind, so God exists is not a hypothesis. We could reply that God s existence is experienced directly, in our experience of human life as an encounter with God. It is no more a hypothesis than the claim that this is a fork. But, to this, we can object that the same argument applies. Just as with hypotheses, when we talk of what we can experience directly, we can imagine situations in which we would withdraw our claim that this is an x. The fork may be a hologram; or it could be a clever illusion, so that when we turn it around, we see it is not a fork at all, but a knife that has been painted; and so on. To be able to say this is a fork meaningfully, we have to know what kinds of situation would lead us to say this is not a fork. So if we say human life is an encounter with God, what kinds of experience would lead us to say, no, it was just an illusion, it isn t an encounter with God? There is nothing that means one has to withdraw one s claim about encountering God. This suggests that God exists is not something we know directly from experience. However, we can object that this argument has a very limited view of meaning. It assumes that for God exists to state a fact, we have to know how to test whether that fact is true or false against experience (and sensory experience at that). But we could argue that the meaning of God exists is related to and secured by making sense of facts. For example, we could use the argument from design to infer that God s existence is the best explanation for the nature of the universe (or use the problem of evil to infer that God does not exist). In this case God exists is a hypothesis, but not a scientific hypothesis, since we use philosophy, not science, to test it. What we mean by God exists will be shown by these arguments. Alternatively, we could argue that philosophical arguments aren t the natural foundation of religious belief, so God exists gains its meaning not from philosophical arguments but from how people experience human life.
2 RELIGIOUS BELIEF MIRRORS ATTITUDES RATHER THAN FACTS The arguments so far still understand God exists as a statement of fact. But we can challenge this. First, as we have already noted, if it is a statement of fact, it is peculiar in that we do not test it against empirical experience. Second, religious belief is clearly not purely intellectual. If one experiences the world as an encounter with God, that involves a disposition to serve God. Third, people don t normally acquire religious beliefs by argument or testing evidence. Instead, they come to an understanding of the world that is expressed in values and a way of living. When someone converts to a religion, what changes isn t so much intellectual beliefs, but their will, what they value, how they choose to live. We can argue, then, that religious belief is not really a genuine form of belief at all. So what is it? To say it expresses feelings is too shallow. Religion is not just about feeling, it is about ways of living. Every religion pays close attention to what people do and gives guidance on how to live. So we can say that religious beliefs are expressions of attitude and commitment, attitudes towards other people, nature, oneself, human history and so on that put the world in a certain light and which support commitments to act in certain ways and to mature as a spiritual being. The core of accepting a religious faith, on this view, is the intention to follow the way of life prescribed by that religion. This is not to say that we can turn any particular religious belief on its own into a rule that guides action. Unlike moral beliefs, such as abortion is wrong, which are directed onto some specific action or policy, religious beliefs always come together, a whole set of beliefs, and the set as a whole indicates a whole way of life. Objections We can object that there is much more to religious beliefs than a commitment to a way of life. What can we say about different religions that recommend similar ways of life? If commitment to a way of life is all that matters, then does it matter at all what one believes? Many religions have thought it does; some have even argued that how one lives is not the main point at all. Religious belief is not the same as a general moral system. Furthermore, many Christians, for instance, would say that they live a certain way because God exists and showed us how to live. But if this answer only expresses the commitment to live a certain way then it doesn t answer the question why live that way. If religious belief is just a commitment, what supports that commitment or is it arbitrary? To answer these objections, we might add that religious beliefs relate to specific stories or myths. These stories differ in different religions, and they don t appear at all in purely moral systems. In Christianity, obviously the stories about Jesus life and death are central. But then, doesn t this make religious belief about facts again? No, we can say, because the stories do not need to be believed to be true; they need to be believed as stories. The story is considered meaningful, rather than literally true, and it supports the commitment to a certain way of life. This might explain the difference between religions and between religion and morality. But, we can still object, a story isn t the right kind of answer to why live like that?. Suppose a boy says that he wants to be a detective when he grows up, and to the question why?, tells you a Sherlock Holmes story. This is fine. Now suppose a Christian, to the question why love your enemy as yourself? tells a story about Jesus. Is this a good answer? If all the stories about Jesus are false, and God doesn t exist, then it is not a
3 command from God that we should try to live this way. So why should we? If religious beliefs are just commitments to a way of life supported by stories, then they seem to be subjective. Many religious believers would not accept this interpretation of belief. WITTGENSTEIN ON LANGUAGE AND RELIGIOUS BELIEF To deepen our understanding of these issues, we first need to think more about meaning. In his Philosophical Investigations, Ludwig Wittgenstein argued that we cannot understand language without understanding the ways in which language is used and how it interacts with how we live and what we do. He attempted to illuminate the nature of language by comparing language to games. In particular, like games, language is an activity guided by rules in games, rules governing what one can do, in language, rules governing meaning; and second, meaning is learned from the rules governing the use of the word/sentence, like pieces in a game are understood by how they can be used. Meaning, then, is often a matter of how words are used. Appreciating this requires a distinction between surface grammar and depth grammar: words or sentences in one context describing objects or an event may be similar on the surface to ones that in another context that do nothing of the sort, e.g. the bus passes the bus stop, the peace of the Lord passes understanding. To understand a particular piece of language, one must look at how the language is used, as meaning is not given by the form of words alone. When looking at how words are used, we need to look at the language game that bit of language and the rules it follows which gives the words their meaning. (Wittgenstein lists as examples of language games asking, thanking, cursing, praying, greeting, and so on.) The idea of language games emphasises the foundation of language in activity. Wittgenstein says that a language game is the speaking part of a form of life. A form of life is far broader than any specific language game, it is the foundation out of which language games grow, the collection of cultural practices which embed language games. The very foundation is biology, and Wittgenstein often emphasises how our natural reactions form the basis for language games. (Think of talking about pain or colour or even responses to music.) But the biology is always taken up in a particular culture, and what is natural is often only natural within a particular way of living as a human being. Human nature involves both biology and culture. Religious belief So religious language must be understood as part of a religious life. Religious life and language contains the many different language games of praise and worship, prayer, miracles and so on; but it can also be understood as forming a game in its own right, governed by particular rules those displayed in the analysis of its depth grammar. Wittgenstein argued that religious language has a depth grammar quite distinct from its surface grammar. Its surface grammar can look empirical, as though, like science, religious language is talking about things and events. This is misleading. A central part of Wittgenstein s analysis is that God exists is not a statement of fact. It is not about a thing, an object that exists as part of the world like natural objects do. It is not a claim about an entity at all. Of course, if it is not an empirical statement, then believing it is not an empirical belief:
4 a religious belief could only be something like a passionate commitment to a system of reference. Hence, although it s a belief, it s really a way of living, or a way of assessing life. It s passionately seizing hold of this interpretation. (Culture and Value, 64) He argued that if we look at how the statement is used, what it expresses for people who believe it, we see that it is not used as a description, it is used to express a form of commitment. This can illustrated by talk of the Last Judgement. This is not a hypothesis about a possible future event; if it was, it would be utterly bizarre (what s the evidence? how is such a belief formed?). The Last Judgement is a picture, an understanding of life by which the believer is guided through life. Another example is provided by D Z Phillips, who defended and developed Wittgenstein s theory. He argues that if someone thinks that prayer is a means to obtaining something, they have misunderstood the nature of religion, and their belief has become superstition. Religious language expresses an emotional attitude and understanding of life and a commitment to living life according to that understanding. It is not a description of the way the world is. In Religious beliefs and language games, Phillips argued that this means that God is not logically prior to religion, some thing to which religion is a human response. Talk of God only makes sense within religious practices. To understand religious language is to understand the place of certain statements in the life of the believer and religious community. And the nature of religious faith and morality shows that these statements are not factual. Discussion An important implication of the view that religious belief is not empirical, but mirrors attitudes and commitments, is that we can t criticise or support religious beliefs by using evidence. Religion cannot be criticised on the grounds that it is not true or highly improbable; for this presupposes that it makes factual claims, and it does not. So, for example, both the argument from design and the problem of evil are irrelevant as attempts to prove or disprove the existence of God. This, we might argue, cuts religious belief off from reason too severely. However, Phillips points out that this doesn t mean there are no grounds for accepting or rejecting religious belief. Religion is part of a form of human life: Religion has something to say about birth, death, joy, misery, despair, hope, fortune, and misfortune. If religious faith makes no sense in the light of such experiences, we will rightly reject it. The problem of evil could be relevant here. Not any set of attitudes and commitments makes sense. But, as we noted in our discussion above, we can object that this interpretation of religious belief as not factual conflicts with how many believers think of God and their faith. Wittgenstein s account looks like a reinterpretation of religious belief, not an analysis of it. It also makes what you believe much less important, as religious faith is about how we live. Yet many religious believers who act in similar ways and hold similar values argue there is something distinctive and important about the different beliefs they hold. Furthermore, within the history of any religion, there have been heated arguments about how to interpret a particular doctrine (e.g. in Christianity, the Incarnation), when it is very difficult to see how the different interpretations could make any impact on
5 different ways of living. All this suggests that religious language is intended to be true, i.e. fact-stating, and not just expressive. We can argue that Wittgenstein was right to point to the expressive use of religious language. But he was wrong to think that because religious beliefs express attitudes, they cannot also be empirical. There is no reason to think that they cannot be both. After all, religious believers do think they are saying something factual when they say God exists. It has this use.
Wittgenstein and Moore s Paradox
Wittgenstein and Moore s Paradox Marie McGinn, Norwich Introduction In Part II, Section x, of the Philosophical Investigations (PI ), Wittgenstein discusses what is known as Moore s Paradox. Wittgenstein
More informationEthical non-naturalism
Michael Lacewing Ethical non-naturalism Ethical non-naturalism is usually understood as a form of cognitivist moral realism. So we first need to understand what cognitivism and moral realism is before
More informationLogical behaviourism
Michael Lacewing Logical behaviourism THE THEORY Logical behaviourism is a form of physicalism, but it does not attempt to reduce mental properties states, events and so on to physical properties directly.
More informationVERIFICATION AND METAPHYSICS
Michael Lacewing The project of logical positivism VERIFICATION AND METAPHYSICS In the 1930s, a school of philosophy arose called logical positivism. Like much philosophy, it was concerned with the foundations
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationHARE S PRESCRIPTIVISM
Michael Lacewing Prescriptivism Theories of what morality is fall into two broad families cognitivism and noncognitivism. The distinction is now understood by philosophers to depend on whether one thinks
More informationHas Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 7714 Volume 3 Issue 11 ǁ November. 2014 ǁ PP.38-42 Has Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
More informationAyer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More informationA Short Course in Logic Answers to Practice
A Short Course in Logic Answers to Practice Logic is a skill and, like any skill, it s improved with practice. I) Analyzing Arguments Sometimes it can be difficult to identify the ultimate conclusion of
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationThe knowledge argument
Michael Lacewing The knowledge argument PROPERTY DUALISM Property dualism is the view that, although there is just one kind of substance, physical substance, there are two fundamentally different kinds
More informationBertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1
Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1 Analysis 46 Philosophical grammar can shed light on philosophical questions. Grammatical differences can be used as a source of discovery and a guide
More informationDeath and Immortality (by D Z Phillips) Introductory Remarks
Death and Immortality (by D Z Phillips) Introductory Remarks Ben Bousquet 24 January 2013 On p.15 of Death and Immortality Dewi Zephaniah Phillips states the following: If we say our language as such is
More informationNICHOLAS J.J. SMITH. Let s begin with the storage hypothesis, which is introduced as follows: 1
DOUBTS ABOUT UNCERTAINTY WITHOUT ALL THE DOUBT NICHOLAS J.J. SMITH Norby s paper is divided into three main sections in which he introduces the storage hypothesis, gives reasons for rejecting it and then
More informationIT is frequently taken for granted, both by people discussing logical
'NECESSARY', 'A PRIORI' AND 'ANALYTIC' IT is frequently taken for granted, both by people discussing logical distinctions1 and by people using them2, that the terms 'necessary', 'a priori', and 'analytic'
More informationDave Elder-Vass Of Babies and Bathwater. A Review of Tuukka Kaidesoja Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology
Journal of Social Ontology 2015; 1(2): 327 331 Book Symposium Open Access Dave Elder-Vass Of Babies and Bathwater. A Review of Tuukka Kaidesoja Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology DOI 10.1515/jso-2014-0029
More informationChance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason
Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason Alexander R. Pruss Department of Philosophy Baylor University October 8, 2015 Contents The Principle of Sufficient Reason Against the PSR Chance Fundamental
More informationCHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND
CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND I. Five Alleged Problems with Theology and Science A. Allegedly, science shows there is no need to postulate a god. 1. Ancients used to think that you
More informationDarwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading
Darwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading I recently attended a debate on Intelligent Design (ID) and the Existence of God. One of the four debaters was Dr. Lawrence Krauss{1}
More informationConcepts of God: Yielding to Love pages 24-27
42. Responding to God (Catechism n. 2566-2567) Concepts of God: Yielding to Love pages 24-27 n. 2566.! We are in search of God. In the act of creation, God calls every being from nothingness into existence.!
More informationWittgenstein s Logical Atomism. Seminar 8 PHIL2120 Topics in Analytic Philosophy 16 November 2012
Wittgenstein s Logical Atomism Seminar 8 PHIL2120 Topics in Analytic Philosophy 16 November 2012 1 Admin Required reading for this seminar: Soames, Ch 9+10 New Schedule: 23 November: The Tractarian Test
More informationPhil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?
Phil 1103 Review Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science? 1. Copernican Revolution Students should be familiar with the basic historical facts of the Copernican revolution.
More informationEvidential arguments from evil
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48: 1 10, 2000. 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 1 Evidential arguments from evil RICHARD OTTE University of California at Santa
More informationPhilosophy. Aim of the subject
Philosophy FIO Philosophy Philosophy is a humanistic subject with ramifications in all areas of human knowledge and activity, since it covers fundamental issues concerning the nature of reality, the possibility
More informationMessage: Faith & Science - Part 3
The Light Shines Outside the Box www.jesusfamilies.org Message: Faith & Science - Part 3 Welcome back to JesusFamilies.org s audio messages! This message is entitled, Faith and Science: Part 3 In part
More informationPHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY
PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY Paper 9774/01 Introduction to Philosophy and Theology Key Messages Most candidates gave equal treatment to three questions, displaying good time management and excellent control
More informationWittgenstein on the Fallacy of the Argument from Pretence. Abstract
Wittgenstein on the Fallacy of the Argument from Pretence Edoardo Zamuner Abstract This paper is concerned with the answer Wittgenstein gives to a specific version of the sceptical problem of other minds.
More informationA R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N
ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around
More informationADVANCED General Certificate of Education Religious Studies Assessment Unit A2 7. assessing. Religious Belief and Competing Claims [AR271]
ADVANCED General Certificate of Education 2012 Religious Studies Assessment Unit A2 7 assessing Religious Belief and Competing Claims [AR271] MONDAY 28 MAY, MORNING MARK SCHEME 6896.01 GCE Religious Studies
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THINKING AT THE EDGE. By Eugene T. Gendlin, Ph.D.
INTRODUCTION TO THINKING AT THE EDGE By Eugene T. Gendlin, Ph.D. "Thinking At the Edge" (in German: "Wo Noch Worte Fehlen") stems from my course called "Theory Construction" which I taught for many years
More informationPhilosophy and Logical Syntax (1935)
Rudolf Carnap: Philosophy and Logical Syntax (1935) Chap. "The Rejection of Metaphysics" 1.Verifiability The problems of philosophy as usually dealt with are of very different kinds. From the point of
More informationFrom Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
More informationORTHODOX CHRISTIAN AND CLASSICAL EDUCATION:
Three Hierarchs Academy is an Orthodox Christian Classical school in Florence, Arizona serving Kingergarten-12th Grade. We exist to partner with parents in order to provide an education that equips students
More informationNaturalism Primer. (often equated with materialism )
Naturalism Primer (often equated with materialism ) "naturalism. In general the view that everything is natural, i.e. that everything there is belongs to the world of nature, and so can be studied by the
More informationCritical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics
Critical Thinking The Very Basics (at least as I see them) Dona Warren Department of Philosophy The University of Wisconsin Stevens Point What You ll Learn Here I. How to recognize arguments II. How to
More informationVan Fraassen: Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism
Aaron Leung Philosophy 290-5 Week 11 Handout Van Fraassen: Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism 1. Scientific Realism and Constructive Empiricism What is scientific realism? According to van Fraassen,
More informationTHE PROBLEM OF CONTRARY-TO-FACT CONDITIONALS. By JOHN WATLING
THE PROBLEM OF CONTRARY-TO-FACT CONDITIONALS By JOHN WATLING There is an argument which appears to show that it is impossible to verify a contrary-to-fact conditional; so giving rise to an important and
More informationNow consider a verb - like is pretty. Does this also stand for something?
Kripkenstein The rule-following paradox is a paradox about how it is possible for us to mean anything by the words of our language. More precisely, it is an argument which seems to show that it is impossible
More informationTHE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS C H A P T E R 3
THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS C H A P T E R 3 OBJECTIVES You will be able to understand: What does learning by inquiry mean? What qualifies as Scientific Evidence? What is a Scientific Theory? What is a Scientific
More informationRealism and the success of science argument. Leplin:
Realism and the success of science argument Leplin: 1) Realism is the default position. 2) The arguments for anti-realism are indecisive. In particular, antirealism offers no serious rival to realism in
More informationRealism and instrumentalism
Published in H. Pashler (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of the Mind (2013), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 633 636 doi:10.4135/9781452257044 mark.sprevak@ed.ac.uk Realism and instrumentalism Mark Sprevak
More informationQualitative and quantitative inference to the best theory. reply to iikka Niiniluoto Kuipers, Theodorus
University of Groningen Qualitative and quantitative inference to the best theory. reply to iikka Niiniluoto Kuipers, Theodorus Published in: EPRINTS-BOOK-TITLE IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult
More informationHume s emotivism. Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Hume s emotivism Theories of what morality is fall into two broad families cognitivism and noncognitivism. The distinction is now understood by philosophers to depend on whether one thinks
More informationMoral requirements are still not rational requirements
ANALYSIS 59.3 JULY 1999 Moral requirements are still not rational requirements Paul Noordhof According to Michael Smith, the Rationalist makes the following conceptual claim. If it is right for agents
More informationWittgenstein on the Impossibility of Private Language
International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 2, No. 3; September 2015 Wittgenstein on the Impossibility of Private Language Stefan Mićić Alfa University Palmira Toljatija 3 11000, Belgrade Serbia
More informationLanguage and the World: Unit Two
1995 2015 Dr Geoffrey Klempner Pathways School of Philosophy www.philosophypathways.com PROGRAM D: PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE Language and the World: Unit Two _ (a) the difference between names and propositions
More informationChristian Evidences. The Verification of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 06 of 12
Christian Evidences CA312 LESSON 06 of 12 Victor M. Matthews, STD Former Professor of Systematic Theology Grand Rapids Theological Seminary This is lecture 6 of the course entitled Christian Evidences.
More informationLecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.
TOPIC: Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Cosmological argument. The problem of Infinite Regress.
More informationAyer s linguistic theory of the a priori
Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2
More informationTractatus Logico-Philosophicus (abridged version) Ludwig Wittgenstein
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (abridged version) Ludwig Wittgenstein PREFACE This book will perhaps only be understood by those who have themselves already thought the thoughts which are expressed in
More informationLENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN
LENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN HTTP://MSTEENHAGEN.GITHUB.IO/TEACHING/2018TOM THE EINSTEIN-BERGSON DEBATE SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein met on the 6th of
More informationThe Power of Critical Thinking Why it matters How it works
Page 1 of 60 The Power of Critical Thinking Chapter Objectives Understand the definition of critical thinking and the importance of the definition terms systematic, evaluation, formulation, and rational
More informationGoing beyond good and evil
Going beyond good and evil ORIGINS AND OPPOSITES Nietzsche criticizes past philosophers for constructing a metaphysics of transcendence the idea of a true or real world, which transcends this world of
More informationCommentary on Sample Test (May 2005)
National Admissions Test for Law (LNAT) Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005) General There are two alternative strategies which can be employed when answering questions in a multiple-choice test. Some
More informationTHE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM
SKÉPSIS, ISSN 1981-4194, ANO VII, Nº 14, 2016, p. 33-39. THE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM ALEXANDRE N. MACHADO Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) Email:
More informationCopyright 2015 by KAD International All rights reserved. Published in the Ghana
Copyright 2015 by KAD International All rights reserved. Published in the Ghana http://kadint.net/our-journal.html The Problem of the Truth of the Counterfactual Conditionals in the Context of Modal Realism
More informationTo appear in The Journal of Philosophy.
To appear in The Journal of Philosophy. Lucy Allais: Manifest Reality: Kant s Idealism and his Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. xi + 329. 40.00 (hb). ISBN: 9780198747130. Kant s doctrine
More informationWell, how are we supposed to know that Jesus performed miracles on earth? Pretty clearly, the answer is: on the basis of testimony.
Miracles Last time we were discussing the Incarnation, and in particular the question of how one might acquire sufficient evidence for it to be rational to believe that a human being, Jesus of Nazareth,
More informationKeeping Your Kids On God s Side - Natasha Crain
Foreword J Warner Wallace 1. As a new youth pastor, Wallace said I had them, helped them form in our youth group, and maybe even inspired them to be better. But I hadn t given them sufficient to Christianity
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College. Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics Scepticism, and the Mind 2 Last Time we looked at scepticism about INDUCTION. This Lecture will move on to SCEPTICISM
More information17. Art History! Dating back to 544 from the Shroud
1. Buzz Aldrin quote is an overview of today s talk. We will be looking at scientific empirical evidence that validates the Catholic Church and what we believe. 2. Science is basically the opposite of
More informationMy self-as-philosopher and my self-as-scientist meet to do research in the classroom: Some Davidsonian notes on the philosophy of educational research
My self-as-philosopher and my self-as-scientist meet to do research in the classroom: Some Davidsonian notes on the philosophy of educational research Andrés Mejía D., Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá,
More informationIII Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
More informationA Rational Solution to the Problem of Moral Error Theory? Benjamin Scott Harrison
A Rational Solution to the Problem of Moral Error Theory? Benjamin Scott Harrison In his Ethics, John Mackie (1977) argues for moral error theory, the claim that all moral discourse is false. In this paper,
More informationI. Scientific Realism: Introduction
I. Scientific Realism: Introduction 1. Two kinds of realism a) Theory realism: scientific theories provide (or aim to provide) true descriptions (and explanations). b) Entity realism: entities postulated
More informationReply to Robert Koons
632 Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic Volume 35, Number 4, Fall 1994 Reply to Robert Koons ANIL GUPTA and NUEL BELNAP We are grateful to Professor Robert Koons for his excellent, and generous, review
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE
PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE QUNE S TWO DOGMAS OF EMPIRICISM LECTURE PROFESSOR JULIE YOO Why We Want an A/S Distinction The Two Projects of the Two Dogmas The Significance of Quine s Two Dogmas Negative Project:
More informationGCE Religious Studies
GCE Religious Studies RST3B Philosophy of Religion Report on the Examination 2060 June 2013 Version: 1.0 Further copies of this Report are available from aqa.org.uk Copyright 2013 AQA and its licensors.
More informationLudwig Wittgenstein: Philosophical Investigations
Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophical Investigations Published posthumously in 1953 Style and method Style o A collection of 693 numbered remarks (from one sentence up to one page, usually one paragraph long).
More informationWittgenstein s On Certainty Lecture 2
Wittgenstein s On Certainty Lecture 2 Recap and Plan: Four sentiments of On Certainty expressed towards Moore s A Defence of Common Sense and Proof of an External World : 1. Moore fails to engage with
More informationReligious Instruction, Religious Studies and Religious Education
Religious Instruction, Religious Studies and Religious Education The different terms of religious instruction, religious studies and religious education have all been used of the broad enterprise of communicating
More informationThe Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia
Francesca Hovagimian Philosophy of Psychology Professor Dinishak 5 March 2016 The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia In his essay Epiphenomenal Qualia, Frank Jackson makes the case
More informationThe Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
More informationPhilosophy of Consciousness
Philosophy of Consciousness Direct Knowledge of Consciousness Lecture Reading Material for Topic Two of the Free University of Brighton Philosophy Degree Written by John Thornton Honorary Reader (Sussex
More informationWho or what is God?, asks John Hick (Hick 2009). A theist might answer: God is an infinite person, or at least an
John Hick on whether God could be an infinite person Daniel Howard-Snyder Western Washington University Abstract: "Who or what is God?," asks John Hick. A theist might answer: God is an infinite person,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Cambridge International Level 3 Pre-U Certificate Principal Subject
www.xtremepapers.com UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Cambridge International Level 3 Pre-U Certificate Principal Subject *2806918554* PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY 9774/02 Paper 2 Key Texts
More informationGetting To God. The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism. truehorizon.org
Getting To God The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism truehorizon.org A True Worldview A worldview is like a set of glasses through which you see everything in life. It is the lens that brings
More informationContemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies
Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies ST503 LESSON 19 of 24 John S. Feinberg, Ph.D. Experience: Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. In
More informationDo we have knowledge of the external world?
Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our
More informationReply to Kit Fine. Theodore Sider July 19, 2013
Reply to Kit Fine Theodore Sider July 19, 2013 Kit Fine s paper raises important and difficult issues about my approach to the metaphysics of fundamentality. In chapters 7 and 8 I examined certain subtle
More informationThe Indeterminacy of Translation: Fifty Years Later
The Indeterminacy of Translation: Fifty Years Later Tufts University BIBLID [0873-626X (2012) 32; pp. 385-393] Abstract The paper considers the Quinean heritage of the argument for the indeterminacy of
More informationWhat Happens When Wittgenstein Asks "What Happens When...?"
The Philosophical Forum Volume XXVIII. No. 3, Winter-Spring 1997 What Happens When Wittgenstein Asks "What Happens When...?" E.T. Gendlin University of Chicago Wittgenstein insisted that rules cannot govern
More informationWittgenstein s The First Person and Two-Dimensional Semantics
Wittgenstein s The First Person and Two-Dimensional Semantics ABSTRACT This essay takes as its central problem Wittgenstein s comments in his Blue and Brown Books on the first person pronoun, I, in particular
More informationBonJour Against Materialism. Just an intellectual bandwagon?
BonJour Against Materialism Just an intellectual bandwagon? What is physicalism/materialism? materialist (or physicalist) views: views that hold that mental states are entirely material or physical in
More informationKS1 Humanist Humanism Science
Progression in HUMANISM Draft 1 Key vocabulary Knowledge and belief Meaning and purpose (Happiness) Celebrations and ceremonies Humanist ethics KS1 Humanist Science The Golden Rule Happy Human Celebrant
More informationHoward Sankey Department of History and Philosophy of Science University of Melbourne
SCIENTIFIC REALISM AND THE GOD S EYE POINT OF VIEW Howard Sankey Department of History and Philosophy of Science University of Melbourne Abstract: According to scientific realism, the aim of science is
More informationPolicy on Religious Education
Atheism Challenging religious faith Policy on Religious Education The sole object of Atheism is the advancement of atheism. In a world in which such object has been fully achieved, there would be no religion
More informationEXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers
EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers Diagram and evaluate each of the following arguments. Arguments with Definitional Premises Altruism. Altruism is the practice of doing something solely because
More informationThe Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World. In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages, Kripke expands upon a conclusion
24.251: Philosophy of Language Paper 2: S.A. Kripke, On Rules and Private Language 21 December 2011 The Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages,
More informationBroad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument
Broad on God Broad on Theological Arguments I. The Ontological Argument Sample Ontological Argument: Suppose that God is the most perfect or most excellent being. Consider two things: (1)An entity that
More informationUnderstanding and its Relation to Knowledge Christoph Baumberger, ETH Zurich & University of Zurich
Understanding and its Relation to Knowledge Christoph Baumberger, ETH Zurich & University of Zurich christoph.baumberger@env.ethz.ch Abstract: Is understanding the same as or at least a species of knowledge?
More informationIntro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.
Overview Philosophy & logic 1.2 What is philosophy? 1.3 nature of philosophy Why philosophy Rules of engagement Punctuality and regularity is of the essence You should be active in class It is good to
More informationGeorge Berkeley. The Principles of Human Knowledge. Review
George Berkeley The Principles of Human Knowledge Review To be is to be perceived Obvious to the Mind all those bodies which compose the earth have no subsistence without a mind, their being is to be perceived
More informationIssue 4, Special Conference Proceedings Published by the Durham University Undergraduate Philosophy Society
Issue 4, Special Conference Proceedings 2017 Published by the Durham University Undergraduate Philosophy Society An Alternative Approach to Mathematical Ontology Amber Donovan (Durham University) Introduction
More informationThe Value of the Life of Reason ( ) Alonzo Fyfe
The Value of the Life of Reason (20170525) Alonzo Fyfe I write this document primarily to try to get you, the reader, to adopt a bit more strongly than you have a devotion to fact and reason, and to promote
More informationPostscript: Reply to McLeod
Postscript: Reply to McLeod Lajos Brons (mail@lajosbrons.net) Department of Philosophy, Nihon University, and Lakeland University, Japan Campus, Tokyo, Japan This is the pre-publication version of my reply
More informationThe Abstracts of Plenary Lectures
The Abstracts of Plenary Lectures Page 1 Miloš Arsenijević Multitude and Heterogeneity: A New Reconstruction of Anaxagoras Cosmology I argue that Anaxagoras teaching concerning the structure of the universe
More informationMerricks on the existence of human organisms
Merricks on the existence of human organisms Cian Dorr August 24, 2002 Merricks s Overdetermination Argument against the existence of baseballs depends essentially on the following premise: BB Whenever
More informationHow Subjective Fact Ties Language to Reality
How Subjective Fact Ties Language to Reality Mark F. Sharlow URL: http://www.eskimo.com/~msharlow ABSTRACT In this note, I point out some implications of the experiential principle* for the nature of the
More informationIntelligent Design. Kevin delaplante Dept. of Philosophy & Religious Studies
Intelligent Design Kevin delaplante Dept. of Philosophy & Religious Studies kdelapla@iastate.edu Some Questions to Ponder... 1. In evolutionary theory, what is the Hypothesis of Common Ancestry? How does
More information