Methods of Enquiry Glossary
|
|
- Evangeline Holmes
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Methods of Enquiry Glossary This glossary is a basic introduction to some of the words we commonly use in Methods of Enquiry (MoE) as we mean them in this module. You might find them used in different ways in other sources, but this glossary provides definitions that we had in mind in putting the MoE course together. Remember however that this is basic, and if you want to do well on the module you will need to use the lectures, tutorials, textbook and other sources to build up your knowledge. The words highlighted in light blue are hyperlinked to other definitions in the glossary, so simply press Ctrl and left click to follow the links or just click if you are using a mac. These sections are arranged (more or less) like the research onions. Critical A critical approach involves a careful, exact evaluation and judgment of the material, identifying both weaknesses and strengths, i.e. critiquing. This is not the same as criticising something. A good example would be her critical evaluation of the Wallendorf and Arnould paper suggested that, although the paper was very long and that the data collected by the students may not be highly reliable, it was a good example of using data and researcher 1
2 Triangulation Critique If you critique something, you use a Critical approach. Paradigm A paradigm is a world view the philosophical or theoretical framework through which we see the world. The only point where we do not have a world view is when we are new born and are yet to learn anything any facts, any rules, any ways of thinking or indeed anything that colours how we view the world. These world views are based upon different Ontology and Epistemology assumptions. In MoE, we use Burrell and Morgan s paradigm matrix (see diagram) so Positivism/Positivist/Functionalism, iinterpretivism/interpretivist and the critical approaches of Radical humanis and Critical approaches Subjective In MOE we group Radical structuralism and Radical humanism into one Critical paradigms lecture. These both use Marxism as their basis, so aim for Emancipation, but differ in their stance toward Objective and Subjective. Radical humanism Interpretivism Radical change Regulation Radical structuralism Functionalism Radical structuralis are the main paradigms we look at. These are suggested as the ways that social researchers see the world and because it is impossible to hold two different world views at the same time, paradigms are Incommensurability. For instance, one simply cannot be Objective and Subjective at the same time and one cannot believe there is one single reality to be discovered and that there are multiple realities constructed through interaction and understanding between individuals. Thomas Kuhn suggested that paradigm shifts occur when an old paradigm is replaced by a new paradigm through scientific revolution, and that multiple paradigms characterise immature sciences. Incommensurability Paradigms are incommensurable because different paradigms are based on different assumptions, for instance about which scientific methods result in valid scientific knowledge, and even about the nature of reality. Different paradigms have no common rules, language, units of measurement or theories so one cannot communicate between them or use them together. This makes it impossible to compare paradigms in a meaningful way. Objective 2
3 For instance, Positivism/Positivists see the world in a fundamentally different way to Interpretivism/Interpretivists. One cannot be both positivist and interpretivist and this can apply to other paradigms too. This idea was suggested by Paul Feyerabend in Ontology The investigation into what types of things there are in the world i.e. the nature of reality. Is this there one single reality waiting to be discovered, as Positivism/Positivists believe? This is objectivism, i.e. taking an Objective view of the world. Or do we construct reality through social interaction? This is being Subjective, or using Constructivism. Objectivism, subjectivism and constructivism are all ontologies. Objective An objective approach seeks to describe a phenomenon without bias, judgement or values. A truly objective stance allows us to see phenomena as they really are, unclouded by perception. This is a central tenet of Positivism/Positivist, and is an ontological stance. Subjective A subjective stance accepts that each individual s view of the world is subject to bias, judgement or values that result from what we know, think and believe. Therefore each person s view of the world will be slightly different, and we must acknowledge this when we analyse and communicate research, resulting in a reflective approach. This is a central tenet of Interpretivism/Interpretivist and is an ontological stance. Realism Realism is sometimes used as an Ontology, based on being Objective, which argues that Empirical data reveals the reality to us, which is waiting to be discovered and is common to all of us (also known as naïve realism). Critical realism Critical realism is also sometimes used as an Ontology that goes a step further than naïve Error! Reference source not found., accepting that while some of the things we sense are indeed real, our senses can also sometimes fool us or not reveal the full truth. This allows Metaphysical concepts to be included in a Post-positivism paradigm. Constructivism Constructivism is an Ontology that argues that we construct our idea of reality from our experiences and interactions with others, i.e. based on being Subjective, therefore such knowledge is constructed rather than discovered. Epistemology Epistemology is from the Greek meaning knowledge science and is concerned with the nature of knowledge i.e. what is knowledge, how do we gather it and how do we know what we know? This depends on what the nature of reality is, i.e. Ontology because that affects how we know about reality. In MoE we use the Paradigms as epistemological perspectives. 3
4 Inductive An inductive approach uses data to generate theory. So data from observation is used to develop themes and patterns (generalisations), which suggest new theory. Sara remembers induction by understanding that this approach is about giving birth to new theory i.e. inducing theory like we induce babies. Inductive research is usually exploratory and therefore Qualitative. Deductive A deductive approach tests existing theory using data. This theory is usually outlined in some kind of literature review at the beginning of the paper, from which Hypothesis are generated, then data is gathered to test the theory. Deductive research is usually Quantitative. Inductive methods Deductive methods THEORIES GENERALIZATIONS HYPOTHESES OBSERVATIONS 4
5 Positivism/Positivist Positivism is a Paradigm that asserts that the truth is located 'out there' in the real world and simply waits to be discovered i.e. an Object ontology. This one truth allows us to establish universal laws that are Empirical verifiable - because the facts exist independently of any theories or human observation and may be apprehended through strict application of Scientific Method i.e. hypothetico-deductive method (based on the Principle of Falsification). Positivist research involves a Deductive approach. A positivist paper is characterised by numerical data, a literature review, at least one Hypothesis, and the use of statistics to analyse the data for a large, randomly chosen sample i.e. a Quantitative approach. Positivism is also known as Functionalis. Many different forms of positivism exist but the two we cover in the most depth are Logical positivism and Post-positivism Logical positivism Logical positivists believe that authentic knowledge can only based on actual sense experience i.e. what we can see, hear, touch, smell or taste things which can be directly observed. This approach was pioneered by The Vienna Circle in the 1920s and 1930s and is based upon naive Objective An objective approach seeks to describe a phenomenon without bias, judgement or values. A truly objective stance allows us to see phenomena as they really are, unclouded by perception. This is a central tenet of Positivism/Positivist, and is an ontological stance. Subjective A subjective stance accepts that each individual s view of the world is subject to bias, judgement or values that result from what we know, think and believe. Therefore each person s view of the world will be slightly different, and we must acknowledge this when we analyse and communicate research, resulting in a reflective approach. This is a central tenet of Interpretivism/Interpretivist and is an ontological stance. Realism. Post-positivism Post-positivists accept that authentic knowledge not only includes sense data (see Logical positivism) but can also include Metaphysical phenomena which are suggested by scientific evidence and logic. This is based upon a version of Critical realism. Sir Karl Popper contributed the Principle of Falsification as a central idea of post-positivism. Functionalism For MOE, functionalism is the same as Positivism/Positivist. Principle of Falsification 5
6 Sir Karl Popper s principle of falsification asserts that a Hypothesis can never be proved; only disproved. A typical example is that one could hypothesise that only white swans exist, and find white swans in France, China, Brazil etc. and say that every case helps prove your hypothesis. However, when one visits Australia where black swans occur naturally, finding just one black swan disproves the hypothesis. So no matter how much proof you have you can never be sure your hypothesis is really true, but just one example of disproof is enough to discount a hypothesis. Hypothesis The word hypothesis derives from the Greek for to suppose, and has a number of meanings. It can refer to a proposed explanation for an observed phenomenon, but in MOE we use it to refer to a supposition based upon existing theory e.g. Miller and Shamsie s first hypothesis is that Discrete property-based resources will provide superior financial performance in predictable environments but will not do so in uncertain environments (p.524), which is based upon evidence from Connor (1991), Liebermann & Montgomery (1988) and other authors. Scientific Method requires that a hypothesis can be tested. Scientific Method Scientific method follows a hypothetico-deductive method i.e. Hypothesis testing, seeking to disprove hypotheses based on the Principle of Falsification. Hypotheses that are disproved are discarded, and those that cannot be disproved survive to be tested again and again. These are then the most likely explanations for observed phenomena. Empirical Empirical information is gained through observation, experience, or experiment. Secondary analysis, e.g. meta-analysis, of such data is also empirical. Metaphysical Metaphysics literally takes us beyond (meta-) the physical (-physics) i.e. to subjects that cannot be observed directly but can be hypothesised based on logic, such as Ontology. Some people also define metaphysics as including things whose existence cannot be tested or proven. Reductionism Reductionism is the process of reducing complex concepts down to their constituent elements. For instance, Maslow reduces complex emotional and physiological needs down and compartmentalises them into his Hierarchy of Needs. An analogy is how Descartes saw animals as machines, reducing complex anatomy and physiology to machine-like elements. Reductionism is a characteristic of Positivism/Positivist, and is the opposite of 6
7 Holism. Operationalisation Operationalisation is the process by which measurable entities are used to represent abstract concepts that need to be converted to something that can be measured for Quantitative research. For instance, Miller & Shamsie use Oscars (Academy Awards) to represent discrete knowledge-based resources. In this case Oscars are proxies for discrete knowledge-based resources i.e. they represent discrete knowledge-based resources but are identical. Proxies Proxies (singular = proxy) are the measurable entities used to represent abstract concepts that impossible to measure directly for Quantitative research. The identification of proxies is part of Operationalisation. The Vienna Circle The Vienna Circle were the group who developed Logical positivism in the 1920s in Vienna. Moritz Schlick, Rudolph Carnap, Otto Neurath, and Ludwig Wittgenstein were all members, and this school of thought eventually developed into the Post-positivism stance that we know today. Interpretivism/Interpretivist Interpretivism is a Paradigm that is based upon a Constructivism point of view, that people construct reality through human interaction, creating understanding and meaning between individuals i.e. a Subjective approach. These understandings and meanings differ between individuals so are relative to each individual; this is known as relativism. Essentially, without human interaction and interpretation, reality as we know it would not exist, and that reality is different for every individual. This is because we each have different knowledge, values and views of the world. This is fundamentally different to Positivism/Positivist. Interpretivist research aims to identify patterns and themes from data to suggest theory i.e. an Inductive approach. Interpretivist papers therefore often feature relatively little preexisting theory and are characterised by rich data such as quotes from interviews or focus groups, usually with a small sample chosen through purposive sampling, i.e. a Qualitative approach. This research is often considered exploratory. Interpretivism is also related to Phenomenology. Phenomenology For MOE, phenomenology is the same as Interpretivism/Interpretivist. Holism Holism asserts that a system cannot be understood by breaking it down into its constituent parts, and is more than the sum of its parts. It is from the Greek word meaning all, entire or 7
8 total. Therefore in order to understand a system, one must embrace its complexity and seek to know as much as one can about it through gathering rich data i.e. through Qualitative methods. Holism is a characteristic of Interpretivism/Interpretivist and is the opposite of Reductionism. Hermeneutic circle The hermeneutic circle refers to the interaction between the whole text and parts of the text. We cannot understand what the whole text means without understanding the meanings of the words it is made up from, but we also cannot understand the exact meanings of the words unless we see them in the context of the whole text. For instance, in English, the word cat could mean catamaran, cat o nine tails (a whip), a cool cat or a pussy cat. With the whole sentence the cat sat on the mat you d be pretty sure it s the final meaning, but without the word cat the sentence would make no sense. The hermeneutic circle is also used in a different sense by interpretivist researchers, who acknowledge that the social world is already interpreted before the social scientist arrives (Blaikie, 1993). In other words, research is interpretation of interpretation. This is sometimes also called the double hermeneutic. Critical approaches In MOE we group Radical structuralism and Radical humanism into one Critical paradigms lecture. These both use Marxism as their basis, so aim for Emancipation, but differ in their stance toward Objective and Subjective. Radical structuralism This Paradigm takes a radical/critical stance based upon Marxism and an Object view, so is concerned with how issues such as patriarchy, racism or class structure impact upon both the physical and social structure of society, resulting in exploitation of natural, technological and human resources. It uses Gareth Morgan s view of organisations as instruments of domination. Radical humanism This Paradigm takes a radical/critical stance based upon Marxism and a Subjective view, so is concerned with the understandings and meanings constructed between individuals and how these constrain certain groups. It uses Gareth Morgan s view of organisations as psychic prisons and seeks to expose issues such as patriarchy, racism or class structure, which result in coercion and disempowerment, in order to allow individuals to achieve their full potential. Critical theory Critical theory, in the social sciences, combines Marxist thought with other influences such as the work of Sigmund Freud on psychoanalysis. It has an explicitly Emancipation aim, and asserts that, by understanding the often hidden processes and assumptions (i.e. Hegemony) that underpin society we can expose systems that deny certain groups the power or 8
9 opportunities that are available to other, dominant groups, and achieve freedom and equality for all. Issues related to race, gender and age are often the subject of critical theory. Critical theory emanates from The Frankfurt School in the 1920s and 1930s, but was given momentum by the civil rights and feminist movements of the 1960s. Jurgen Habermas was a key philosopher associated with development of critical theory. Emancipation Emancipation is freedom from constraint. It has been used to describe the abolition of slavery and the granting of votes for women. Hegemony Hegemony is the implicit political, economic, ideological or cultural power exerted by a dominant group over other groups. This is often based on widely accepted and unquestioned ideologies that underpin society, such as patriarchy or class structure. The Frankfurt School The Frankfurt School was a group who combined Marxism thought with other ideas such as Freud s psychoanalysis and Kant s critical philosophy, concepts which eventually developed into Critical theory. They established the Institute for Social Research at the University of Frankfurt am Main. Felix Weil initiated the group, but Max Horkheimer took over as director of the institute in 1930, and Jurgen Habermas in Marxism Karl Marx ( ) was a German philosopher, political economist, historian, political theorist, sociologist, communist, and revolutionary, credited with being the father of communism. The first line of his most famous work The Communist Manifesto says "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles" and sums up his major contribution to philosophy. He wanted to understand how existing systems of society and capitalism reinforced and reproduced such inequalities, and by exposing them, change them. He believed that revolution was the only means of overcoming such inequalities. Methodology Quantitative and Qualitative research strategies are both methodologies, and refer to the rationale and the philosophical assumptions that underlie a particular study, which is related to Ontology and Epistemology. Methodology is not simply a list of methods. Quantitative Quantitative research usually features large, randomly selected samples that are assumed to be representative of a wider population. Numerical (i.e. quantitative) data is gathered and analysed, often with statistics to decide whether a result is significant or not. This research tends to reduce complicated concepts (Reductionism) down to measurable units by Operationalisation. A quantitative approach is a research Methodology. It is usually used in Deductive research, as part of a Positivism/Positivist approach. 9
10 Qualitative Qualitative research features small, purposively selected samples (i.e. organisations or individuals chosen specifically for the insight they can offer the researcher). These are investigated in great depth, gathering rich data through Methods such as interviews, focus groups and ethnography. This data is analysed to identify themes and patterns, which are used to suggest theory. A qualitative approach is a research Methodology. It is usually used in Inductive research as part of an Interpretivism/Interpretivist approach. 10
11 Triangulation Triangulation describes any research process that includes more than one point of view i.e. looking at a question from two or more different angles. This can be done by using a number of different sources of data or researchers or theory, or at the levels of Method, Methodology or Paradigm. The term comes from the process of using more than one bearing to fix the point at which to shoot or the process of using more than one landmark (e.g. a hill, a river and a church) to fix one s position. Either process involves making a triangle where the lines cross is where you are aiming at. In the same way, wherever data, researchers, theory, methods, methodology or paradigms overlap is where the truth is likely to lie. Method Experiments, surveys and numerical analysis of company data are all examples of Quantitative methods. Interviews, focus groups and ethnography are all examples of Qualitative methods. Methods are the specific research techniques used to gather data appropriate to the chosen Methodology. Evaluation There are four lectures in interpreting and evaluating a number of different research methodologies. Evaluating means taking a Critical approach to looking at research, and using the criteria supplied in the lectures to judge what the strengths and weaknesses of the research are. Validity Validity is usually used to evaluate whether Positivism/Positivist research really measures what it claims to be measuring, for instance have the right Methods and Proxies been used. Highly valid research gives us a more accurate picture of what is actually happening. Reliability Reliability is used to evaluate Positivism/Positivist methods, by assessing whether, if the research was carried out in exactly the same way again, it would reach the same conclusions. It is a hallmark of good positivist research that it can be repeated and find the same results, emphasising that such research has little random error, good measuring instruments and consistency of results. 11
12 Generalisability Results are considered generalisable if they can be extrapolated to a wider population. This is why we use random sampling and large samples in Positivism/Positivist research, so that they sample is as representative of the wider population as possible. Credibility Credibility refers to how believable research conclusions are, based upon common sense and intuition, and is often used to judge Interpretivism/Interpretivist research. For instance, do the themes identified in Wallendorf and Arnould s paper about Thanksgiving ring true to us, and, perhaps more importantly, to people who celebrate Thanksgiving? Authenticity Authenticity judges how well research actually reflects what is happening in the situation under study, and is often used to judge Interpretivism/Interpretivist research. For instance, how good an insight does the paper by Wallendorf and Arnould give us into the rituals of consumption of Thanksgiving in US homes? How close does it get to the actual experience of being an American in this group celebrating Thanksgiving? Plausibility This is a similar idea to Credibility. Academic Journals This section is about the language used in referencing. Journal A journal is a published collection of academic Papers/Articles. Examples include Organization, Strategic Management Journal, Academy of Management Review and Administrative Science Quarterly. Volume Journals are usually divided into volumes: one volume is usually equivalent to one year of that journal. Volumes may be subdivided into Issues. Issue A number of issues are often published per Volume of a jjournal each year. Each issue contains a number of Papers/Articles. Paper A piece of work submitted to an academic Journal and published as one entry in that journal. Papers may be Empirical, theoretical or a literature review. e.g. the articles we use by Miller & Shamsie, Wallendorf & Arnould, Brown & Eisenhardt and Collinson are all papers. 12
13 Article The same as an academic Volume Journals are usually divided into volumes: one volume is usually equivalent to one year of that journal. Volumes may be subdivided into Issues. Issue A number of issues are often published per Volume of a jjournal each year. Each issue contains a number of Papers/Articles. Paper. Peer-review The process of using other researchers (peers) to review academic papers prior to publication. They make comments on the quality of the work, suggest improvements and tell the Editor whether they think the paper should be published as it is, requires more work (revision), or should be rejected outright. Editor The person in charge of an academic Journal. Reviewer One of the people that the Editor asks to Peer-review academic papers. 13
EXAM PREP (Semester 2: 2018) Jules Khomo. Linguistic analysis is concerned with the following question:
PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE ARE MY PERSONAL EXAM PREP NOTES. ANSWERS ARE TAKEN FROM LECTURER MEMO S, STUDENT ANSWERS, DROP BOX, MY OWN, ETC. THIS DOCUMENT CAN NOT BE SOLD FOR PROFIT AS IT IS BEING SHARED AT
More informationONTOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF PLURALIST RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES
ONTOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF PLURALIST RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES Donald J Falconer and David R Mackay School of Management Information Systems Faculty of Business and Law Deakin University Geelong 3217 Australia
More informationSydenham College of Commerce & Economics. * Dr. Sunil S. Shete. * Associate Professor
Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics * Dr. Sunil S. Shete * Associate Professor Keywords: Philosophy of science, research methods, Logic, Business research Abstract This paper review Popper s epistemology
More informationKey definitions Action Ad hominem argument Analytic A priori Axiom Bayes s theorem
Key definitions Action Relates to the doings of purposive agents. A key preoccupation of philosophy of social science is the explanation of human action either through antecedent causes or reasons. Accounts
More informationAim of sociology: To find out why people behave as they do.
Positivists Interpretivism Main aim: Reliability, Representativeness and Generalisability Main aim: Validity Structuralists: Sees society has a set of institutions which shape : Sees society as created
More informationthe paradigms have on the structure of research projects. An exploration of epistemology, ontology
Abstract: This essay explores the dialogue between research paradigms in education and the effects the paradigms have on the structure of research projects. An exploration of epistemology, ontology and
More informationLectures and laboratories activities on the nature of Physics and concepts and models in optic: 1. Scientific sentences
Lectures and laboratories activities on the nature of Physics and concepts and models in optic: 1. Scientific sentences Alberto Stefanel Research Unit in Physics Education University of Udine Which of
More informationPHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING
PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING By John Bloore Internet Encyclopdia of Philosophy, written by John Wttersten, http://www.iep.utm.edu/cr-ratio/#h7 Carl Gustav Hempel (1905 1997) Known for Deductive-Nomological
More informationFINAL EXAM REVIEW SHEET. objectivity intersubjectivity ways the peer review system is supposed to improve objectivity
Philosophy of Science Professor Stemwedel Spring 2014 Important concepts and terminology metaphysics epistemology descriptive vs. normative norms of science Strong Program sociology of science naturalism
More informationModule 1: Science as Culture Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science
Module 1: Science as Culture Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science Lecture 6 Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science In this lecture, we are going to discuss how historically
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationPOSITIVISM. Description of Modules
POSITIVISM Component-I (A) - Personal Details Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Prof. Masood Ahsan Siddiqui Department of Geography, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi Paper Coordinator, if any
More informationLecture 9. A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism
Lecture 9 A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism A summary of scientific methods and attitudes What is a scientific approach? This question can be answered in a lot of different ways.
More informationMANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A THOUGHT ON VALIDITY OF POSITIVISM
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A THOUGHT ON VALIDITY OF POSITIVISM CONTINUE ANDDISON EKETU, PhD Department of Management, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Eketuresearch@gmail.com Tel: +234 80372 40736 Abstract
More informationHas Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 7714 Volume 3 Issue 11 ǁ November. 2014 ǁ PP.38-42 Has Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
More informationPhil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?
Phil 1103 Review Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science? 1. Copernican Revolution Students should be familiar with the basic historical facts of the Copernican revolution.
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH
PHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH PCES 3.42 Even before Newton published his revolutionary work, philosophers had already been trying to come to grips with the questions
More informationPositions 1 and 2 are rarely useful in academic discourse Issues, evidence, underpinning assumptions, context etc. make arguments complex and nuanced
Shaun Theobald S.R.Theobald@kent.ac.uk The Student Learning Advisory Service With any argument, theoretical statement or academic opinion we can adopt 3 positions: 1.Agree 2.Disagree 3.Agree/disagree with
More informationQué es la filosofía? What is philosophy? Philosophy
Philosophy PHILOSOPHY AS A WAY OF THINKING WHAT IS IT? WHO HAS IT? WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A WAY OF THINKING AND A DISCIPLINE? It is the propensity to seek out answers to the questions that we ask
More informationLearning from Mistakes Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn
chapter 36 Learning from Mistakes Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn In 1666 a young scientist was sitting in a garden when an apple fell to the ground. This made him wonder why apples fall straight down, rather
More informationLecture 6. Realism and Anti-realism Kuhn s Philosophy of Science
Lecture 6 Realism and Anti-realism Kuhn s Philosophy of Science Realism and Anti-realism Science and Reality Science ought to describe reality. But what is Reality? Is what we think we see of reality really
More informationBusiness Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method
Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method Professor Tim Mazzarol UWA Business School MGMT6791 UWA Business School DBA Program tim.mazzarol@uwa.edu.au
More informationCourses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year
1 Department/Program 2012-2016 Assessment Plan Department: Philosophy Directions: For each department/program student learning outcome, the department will provide an assessment plan, giving detailed information
More informationThe University of Strathclyde 16 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XQ
Investment Benchmarks: Their ontological and epistemological roots. Daniel Broby Daniel.Broby@strath.ac.uk The University of Strathclyde 16 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XQ Abstact This paper investigates the
More informationBIO 221 Invertebrate Zoology I Spring Course Information. Course Website. Lecture 1. Stephen M. Shuster Professor of Invertebrate Zoology
BIO 221 Invertebrate Zoology I Spring 2010 Stephen M. Shuster Northern Arizona University http://www4.nau.edu/isopod Lecture 1 Course Information Stephen M. Shuster Professor of Invertebrate Zoology Office:
More informationAyer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More informationHigher National Unit Specification. General information for centres. Unit title: Philosophy C: An Introduction to Analytic Philosophy
Higher National Unit Specification General information for centres Unit code: D7PN 35 Unit purpose: This Unit aims to develop knowledge and understanding of the Anglo- American analytic tradition in 20
More informationIntroduction to Deductive and Inductive Thinking 2017
Topic 1: READING AND INTERVENING by Ian Hawkins. Introductory i The Philosophy of Natural Science 1. CONCEPTS OF REALITY? 1.1 What? 1.2 How? 1.3 Why? 1.4 Understand various views. 4. Reality comprises
More information145 Philosophy of Science
Logical empiricism Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 145 Philosophy of Science Vienna Circle (Ernst Mach Society) Hans Hahn, Otto Neurath, and Philipp Frank regularly meet
More informationMETHODENSTREIT WHY CARL MENGER WAS, AND IS, RIGHT
METHODENSTREIT WHY CARL MENGER WAS, AND IS, RIGHT BY THORSTEN POLLEIT* PRESENTED AT THE SPRING CONFERENCE RESEARCH ON MONEY IN THE ECONOMY (ROME) FRANKFURT, 20 MAY 2011 *FRANKFURT SCHOOL OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT
More informationQCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus
QCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus Considerations supporting the development of Learning Intentions, Success Criteria, Feedback & Reporting Where are Syllabus objectives taught (in
More informationThere are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.
INTRODUCTION TO LOGICAL THINKING Lecture 6: Two types of argument and their role in science: Deduction and induction 1. Deductive arguments Arguments that claim to provide logically conclusive grounds
More informationClass 6 - Scientific Method
2 3 Philosophy 2 3 : Intuitions and Philosophy Fall 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus I. Holism, Reflective Equilibrium, and Science Class 6 - Scientific Method Our course is centrally concerned with
More informationPHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0
1 2 3 4 5 PHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0 Hume and Kant! Remember Hume s question:! Are we rationally justified in inferring causes from experimental observations?! Kant s answer: we can give a transcendental
More informationThe Nature of Enquiry
The Nature of Enquiry Dr John Ravenscroft (Course Organiser) Credit Rating 20 credits, SCQF 11 Course Summary The aim of this course is to introduce philosophical and epistemological perspectives that
More informationPopper s Falsificationism. Philosophy of Economics University of Virginia Matthias Brinkmann
Popper s Falsificationism Philosophy of Economics University of Virginia Matthias Brinkmann Contents 1. The Problem of Induction 2. Falsification as Demarcation 3. Falsification and Economics Popper's
More informationHonours Programme in Philosophy
Honours Programme in Philosophy Honours Programme in Philosophy The Honours Programme in Philosophy is a special track of the Honours Bachelor s programme. It offers students a broad and in-depth introduction
More informationPhilosophy of Science
Chapter 2 25 Philosophy of Science All men by nature desire knowledge. Aristotle Man, being the servant and interpreter of Nature, can do and understand so much and so much only as he has observed in fact
More informationFall 2016 Department of Philosophy Graduate Course Descriptions
Fall 2016 Department of Philosophy Graduate Course Descriptions http://www.buffalo.edu/cas/philosophy/grad-study/grad_courses/fallcourses_grad.html PHI 548 Biomedical Ontology Professor Barry Smith Monday
More informationThe idea of a University. Professionalisation. Research: Theory, Method, Practice Lectures 3: Human and social sciences Stefan Arnborg, KTH
Research: Theory, Method, Practice Lectures 3: Human and social sciences Stefan Arnborg, KTH Modern Global University system: clever and delicate merge of enlightenment inspired French Grandes Ecoles and
More informationThe Human Science Debate: Positivist, Anti-Positivist, and Postpositivist Inquiry. By Rebecca Joy Norlander. November 20, 2007
The Human Science Debate: Positivist, Anti-Positivist, and Postpositivist Inquiry By Rebecca Joy Norlander November 20, 2007 2 What is knowledge and how is it acquired through the process of inquiry? Is
More informationInstitute of Social Sciences Regional Centre Puducherry. A Brief Report of the
Institute of Social Sciences Regional Centre Puducherry A Brief Report of the The First Lecture under Regional Centre Puducherry Distinguished Lecture Series By Dr. Sebastian Normandin Ashoka University
More informationINDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE
INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE Péter Érdi Henry R. Luce Professor Center for Complex Systems Studies Kalamazoo College, Michigan and Dept. Biophysics KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics of
More informationSubject Overview Curriculum pathway
Subject Overview Curriculum pathway Course Summary Edexcel AS Level Religious Studies Unit / Module AS UNIT 1 Foundations AS UNIT 2 Investigations A2 UNIT 3 A2 UNIT 4 - Implications The Cosmological Argument
More informationWorld Religions. These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide.
World Religions These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide. Overview Extended essays in world religions provide
More informationVERIFICATION AND METAPHYSICS
Michael Lacewing The project of logical positivism VERIFICATION AND METAPHYSICS In the 1930s, a school of philosophy arose called logical positivism. Like much philosophy, it was concerned with the foundations
More informationAction Research : Philosophy in Management
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323695512 Action Research : Philosophy in Management Book March 2018 CITATIONS 0 READS 2 1
More informationIs there a good epistemological argument against platonism? DAVID LIGGINS
[This is the penultimate draft of an article that appeared in Analysis 66.2 (April 2006), 135-41, available here by permission of Analysis, the Analysis Trust, and Blackwell Publishing. The definitive
More informationPhilosophy (PHILOS) Courses. Philosophy (PHILOS) 1
Philosophy (PHILOS) 1 Philosophy (PHILOS) Courses PHILOS 1. Introduction to Philosophy. 4 Units. A selection of philosophical problems, concepts, and methods, e.g., free will, cause and substance, personal
More informationNATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE
NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE NATURALISM a philosophical view according to which philosophy is not a distinct mode of inquiry with its own problems and its own special body of (possible) knowledge philosophy
More informationMISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING
Prentice Hall Mathematics:,, 2004 Missouri s Framework for Curricular Development in Mathematics (Grades 9-12) TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING 1. Problem-solving strategies such as organizing data, drawing a
More informationSAMPLE. Science and Epistemology. Chapter An uneasy relationship
Chapter 14 Science and Epistemology In this chapter first we will bring our story more or less up-to-date, and second we will round out some issues concerning the concepts of knowledge and justification;
More informationPhilosophy of Economics and Politics
Philosophy of Economics and Politics Lecture I, 12 October 2015 Julian Reiss Agenda for today What this module aims to achieve What is philosophy of economics and politics and why should we care? Overview
More informationVarious historical aims of research
Updated 4-2-18 The second Stage Various historical aims of research Introduction To assist the forward movement of students we have provided knowledge of research. Using a brief understanding we have provided
More information2017 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions
National Qualifications 07 07 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 07 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only
More informationWhy Good Science Is Not Value-Free
Why Good Science Is Not Value-Free Karim Bschir, Dep. of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich FPF 2017 Workshop, Zurich Scientific Challenges in the Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials
More informationCh V: The Vienna Circle (Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, and Otto Neurath)[title crossed out?]
Part II: Schools in Contemporary Philosophy Ch V: The Vienna Circle (Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, and Otto Neurath)[title crossed out?] 1. The positivists of the nineteenth century, men like Mach and
More informationCourses Description. Philosophy Department
Courses Description B.A. Programmed Philosophy Department 2303100Logic and Critical Thinking Thinking ; Thinking Critically ; Problems Solving ; Perceiving ; Language ; Reporting, Inferring, Judging ;
More informationPhilosophy of Science PHIL 241, MW 12:00-1:15
Philosophy of Science PHIL 241, MW 12:00-1:15 Naomi Fisher nfisher@clarku.edu (508) 793-7648 Office: 35 Beck (Philosophy) House (on the third floor) Office hours: MR 10:00-11:00 and by appointment Course
More informationUNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA MATHEMATICS AS MAKE-BELIEVE: A CONSTRUCTIVE EMPIRICIST ACCOUNT SARAH HOFFMAN
UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA MATHEMATICS AS MAKE-BELIEVE: A CONSTRUCTIVE EMPIRICIST ACCOUNT SARAH HOFFMAN A thesis submitted to the Faculty of graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationA Scientific Realism-Based Probabilistic Approach to Popper's Problem of Confirmation
A Scientific Realism-Based Probabilistic Approach to Popper's Problem of Confirmation Akinobu Harada ABSTRACT From the start of Popper s presentation of the problem about the way for confirmation of a
More informationComments on Scott Soames, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, volume I
Comments on Scott Soames, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, volume I (APA Pacific 2006, Author meets critics) Christopher Pincock (pincock@purdue.edu) December 2, 2005 (20 minutes, 2803
More informationGCE Religious Studies
GCE Religious Studies RST3B Philosophy of Religion Report on the Examination 2060 June 2013 Version: 1.0 Further copies of this Report are available from aqa.org.uk Copyright 2013 AQA and its licensors.
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationAyer and the Vienna Circle
Ayer and the Vienna Circle Richard Zach October 29, 2010 1/20 Richard Zach Ayer and the Vienna Circle Outline 1 The Vienna Circle 2 Ayer s Logical Positivism 3 Truth and Analyticity 4 Language, Truth and
More informationThe poverty of mathematical and existential truth: examples from fisheries science C. J. Corkett
Manuscript in preparation, July, 2011 The poverty of mathematical and existential truth: examples from fisheries science C. J. Corkett Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H
More informationClass #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism
Philosophy 405: Knowledge, Truth and Mathematics Fall 2010 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism I. The Continuum Hypothesis and Its Independence The continuum problem
More informationUndergraduate Calendar Content
PHILOSOPHY Note: See beginning of Section H for abbreviations, course numbers and coding. Introductory and Intermediate Level Courses These 1000 and 2000 level courses have no prerequisites, and except
More informationReview of Who Rules in Science?, by James Robert Brown
Review of Who Rules in Science?, by James Robert Brown Alan D. Sokal Department of Physics New York University 4 Washington Place New York, NY 10003 USA Internet: SOKAL@NYU.EDU Telephone: (212) 998-7729
More informationReligious belief, hypothesis and attitudes
Michael Lacewing Religious belief, hypothesis and attitudes THE STATUS OF THE RELIGIOUS HYPOTHESIS A hypothesis is a proposal that needs to be tested (and confirmed or rejected) by experience. We use experience
More information7AAN2004 Early Modern Philosophy report on summative essays
7AAN2004 Early Modern Philosophy report on summative essays On the whole, the essays twelve in all were pretty good. The marks ranged from 57% to 75%, and there were indeed four essays, a full third of
More informationThe Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
More informationContents EMPIRICISM. Logical Atomism and the beginnings of pluralist empiricism. Recap: Russell s reductionism: from maths to physics
Contents EMPIRICISM PHIL3072, ANU, 2015 Jason Grossman http://empiricism.xeny.net lecture 9: 22 September Recap Bertrand Russell: reductionism in physics Common sense is self-refuting Acquaintance versus
More informationOn the epistemological status of mathematical objects in Plato s philosophical system
On the epistemological status of mathematical objects in Plato s philosophical system Floris T. van Vugt University College Utrecht University, The Netherlands October 22, 2003 Abstract The main question
More informationPOLI 343 Introduction to Political Research
POLI 343 Introduction to Political Research Session 3-Positivism and Humanism Lecturer: Prof. A. Essuman-Johnson, Dept. of Political Science Contact Information: aessuman-johnson@ug.edu.gh College of Education
More informationWittgenstein and Moore s Paradox
Wittgenstein and Moore s Paradox Marie McGinn, Norwich Introduction In Part II, Section x, of the Philosophical Investigations (PI ), Wittgenstein discusses what is known as Moore s Paradox. Wittgenstein
More informationMoral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary
Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,
More informationKent Academic Repository
Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Milton, Damian (2007) Sociological theory: an introduction to Marxism. N/A. (Unpublished) DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/62740/
More informationA Note on Straight-Thinking
A Note on Straight-Thinking A supplementary note for the 2nd Annual JTS/CGST Public Ethics Lecture March 5, 2002(b), adj. 2009:03:05 G.E.M. of TKI Arguments & Appeals In arguments, people try to persuade
More informationHPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Revision Guide (all topics)
HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Revision Guide (all topics) General Questions What is the distinction between a descriptive and a normative project in the philosophy of science? What are the virtues of this or that
More informationLecture 1. The Science of Economics
Lecture 1 The Science of Economics Economics is a social science: goal is to understand and predict human behavior (both individual and group) Note: accurate predictions do not necessarily imply a good
More informationPROSPECTIVE TEACHERS UNDERSTANDING OF PROOF: WHAT IF THE TRUTH SET OF AN OPEN SENTENCE IS BROADER THAN THAT COVERED BY THE PROOF?
PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS UNDERSTANDING OF PROOF: WHAT IF THE TRUTH SET OF AN OPEN SENTENCE IS BROADER THAN THAT COVERED BY THE PROOF? Andreas J. Stylianides*, Gabriel J. Stylianides*, & George N. Philippou**
More informationRule-Following and the Ontology of the Mind Abstract The problem of rule-following
Rule-Following and the Ontology of the Mind Michael Esfeld (published in Uwe Meixner and Peter Simons (eds.): Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age. Papers of the 22nd International Wittgenstein Symposium.
More informationGenre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science
Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science 1. Social Science Essays Social sciences encompass a range of disciplines; each discipline uses a range of techniques, styles, and structures of writing.
More informationPositive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones
Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy Roger Bishop Jones Started: 3rd December 2011 Last Change Date: 2011/12/04 19:50:45 http://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/www/books/ppfd/ppfdpam.pdf Id: pamtop.tex,v
More informationSAMPLE ESSAY 1: PHILOSOPHY & SOCIAL SCIENCE (1 ST YEAR)
SAMPLE ESSAY 1: PHILOSOPHY & SOCIAL SCIENCE (1 ST YEAR) Before you read the essay This is a very nice essay but it could be improved! Read it through, bearing in mind the comments in the red boxes, and
More informationCentre for Public Policy Research Working Papers Series Paper No: 1. An Introduction to Critical Realism as a Meta-Theoretical Research Perspective
Centre for Public Policy Research Working Papers Series Paper No: 1 An Introduction to Critical Realism as a Meta-Theoretical Research Perspective John Owens King s College London Abstract This paper offers
More informationIDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?
IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All? -You might have heard someone say, It doesn t really matter what you believe, as long as you believe something. While many people think this is
More informationPhilosophy and Methods of the Social Sciences
Philosophy and Methods of the Social Sciences Instructors Cameron Macdonald & Don Tontiplaphol Teaching Fellow Tim Beaumont Social Studies 40 Spring 2014 T&TH (10 11 AM) Pound Hall #200 Lecture 10: Feb.
More informationPositive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones
Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy Roger Bishop Jones June 5, 2012 www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/www/books/ppfd/ppfdbook.pdf c Roger Bishop Jones; Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Metaphysical Positivism 3
More informationThe problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...
The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Defining induction... 2 3.0 Induction versus deduction... 2 4.0 Hume's descriptive
More informationRussell s Problems of Philosophy
Russell s Problems of Philosophy IT S (NOT) ALL IN YOUR HEAD J a n u a r y 1 9 Today : 1. Review Existence & Nature of Matter 2. Russell s case against Idealism 3. Next Lecture 2.0 Review Existence & Nature
More informationDepartment of Philosophy
The University of Alabama at Birmingham 1 Department of Philosophy Chair: Dr. Gregory Pence The Department of Philosophy offers the Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in philosophy, as well as a minor
More informationIII Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
More informationJDOC 61,1. Accepted 6 October 2004
The Emerald Research Register for this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregister The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0022-0418.htm
More informationA-level Religious Studies
A-level Religious Studies RST3B Philosophy of Religion Report on the Examination 2060 June 2014 Version: 1.0 Further copies of this Report are available from aqa.org.uk Copyright 2014 AQA and its licensors.
More informationCLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH
CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH I. Challenges to Confirmation A. The Inductivist Turkey B. Discovery vs. Justification 1. Discovery 2. Justification C. Hume's Problem 1. Inductive
More information* Dalhousie Law School, LL.B. anticipated Interpretation and Legal Theory. Andrei Marmor Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, 193 pp.
330 Interpretation and Legal Theory Andrei Marmor Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, 193 pp. Reviewed by Lawrence E. Thacker* Interpretation may be defined roughly as the process of determining the meaning
More informationA Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript
Screen 1: Marketing Research is based on the Scientific Method. A quick review of the Scientific Method, therefore, is in order. Text based slide. Time Code: 0:00 A Quick Review of the Scientific Method
More information