What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle With Respect to Lawgiving?
|
|
- Jayson Sims
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle With Respect to Lawgiving? Charles E. Butterworth To be even remotely interested in what we can learn from al-fārābī about Plato and Aristotle with respect to lawgiving or any other important topic, we must first know something about who al-fārābī is and why what he has to say might be worth our attention. Generally known as the second teacher, that is, second after Aristotle, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn Ṭarkhān ibn Awzalagh al-fārābī is generally heralded as having founded political philosophy within the Islamic cultural tradition. Born in about 870 in the village of Farab in Turkestan, he resided in Bukhara, Marv, Harran, Baghdad, and perhaps in Constantinople, as well as in Aleppo, Cairo, and Damascus, where he died in 950. John Scotus Eriugena, who was actually born in Ireland and whose efforts to defend the doctrines of the Church led him to France, died in about 877 or just about the time al-fārābī was born, while Anselm of Canterbury, often referred to as the second Augustine, was born just over 80 years after al-fārābī died, that is, in Isaac Israeli, whose philosophical accomplishments were harshly assessed by Maimonides in a letter to Samuel Ibn Tibbon, was a near contemporary of al-fārābī and lived from about in Egypt. Saadia Gaon or, more properly, Saadia ibn Joseph al-fayyūmī, was, as his name indicates, also from Egypt and lived from Somewhat better known than Isaac, he was, primarily interested in theology and religious ethics. In sum, the term dark ages may say more about our ignorance of this time than about reality. Al-Fārābī s era is one of the richest in Arabic and Islamic culture, especially philosophy. A Bird s-eye View of Arabic-Islamic Philosophy At least five outstanding figures characterize Arabic-Islamic philosophy during the classical period of medieval Islamic culture, that is, from about 850 to 1350 or from the time of Abū Yūsuf Ya qūb ibn Isḥāq al-kindī to that of Abd al-raḥmān Ibn Khaldūn. The first, known as the philosopher of the Arabs and famous for his treatise on metaphysics, was born in Basra and educated in Baghdad, where he died in 866. The latter variously dubbed the father of sociology or the founder of historiography, neither title coming even remotely close to capturing what he
2 472 Charles E. Butterworth accomplished was born in Tunis in 1332 and died in Cairo in He wrote a comprehensive three volume Introduction to his much longer seven volume philosophy of the history of the world. Thanks to Franz Rosenthal s translation of the shorter work as well as to Muhsin Mahdi s study of Ibn Khaldūn s thought in general, we know much more about him and his ideas than about many of the other philosophers who flourished during this period. Sometime political advisor to widows and frequent boon companion of princes, Abū Alī al-ḥusayn Ibn Sīnā, or Avicenna, was born in Afshanah in 980 and died in Hamadhan almost 60 years later. He is justly famous for his forty volume exposition of Aristotle s teaching, al-shifā or Healing, numerous other books, and a comprehensive tome on medicine. Still, he must be blamed for the injudicious remarks that drew upon philosophy and philosophers the ire of the jurists and theologians, notably that of Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad al-ghazālī ( ) in his Tahāfut al-falāsifa (Destruction of the Philosophers). The attack was severe and carried the day, especially because it came forth at a time when theologians and jurists enjoyed great esteem and had bested the other contenders for cultural glory, the grammarians. What is more, for a number of political reasons, cultural life was waning in the east. Anticipating, as it were, Horace Greely s advice, philosophy moved west, abandoning Baghdad, Damascus, and Cairo to take root in Andalusia, in Cordoba as well as in Marrakush. There, Abū Bakr Muḥammad Ibn Ṭufayl, who lived in Cordoba from , composed the intriguing philosophical novel, Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān (Living the Son of Awakened), and was chiefly responsible for setting Abū al-walīd Muḥammad Ibn Rushd, or Averroes, on his path as commentator on Aristotle. Of Averroes, who died in 1198, just at the advent of the 13 th century, suffice to say that he redeemed philosophy by his answers to al-ghazālī and then gently instructed fellow philosophers in the delicate art of speaking so as to be understood by one another but not so as to trouble the opinions of those less learned. Note that Averroes contemporary and fellow Cordovan was none other than Mūsā ibn Maymūn or Maimonides ( ), who developed the art of esoteric writing far beyond the stipulations of either al-fārābī or Averroes but then put an explicit limit on the kind of questions to be reasonably explored in philosophy. At this point, Latin-Christian philosophy enters the picture. Prior to Ibn Khaldūn, we find Roger Bacon, Giles of Rome, Thomas Aquinas, Dante, and Marsilius of Padua struggling with the teachings of the Arab philosophers, notably Averroes, but al-fārābī and Avicenna as well. Far more could be said about the rich and complex learning in science, mathematics, poetry, history, grammar, theology, jurisprudence, medicine, as well as the practical arts of that earlier cultural world. All of these Mélanges de l Université Saint-Joseph 61 (2008)
3 What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle? 473 individuals, and numerous others in addition, were bursting with a desire to learn more about ancient Greek culture even as they were struggling to ensure that the revelation they had been vouchsafed would not perish. About al-fārābī The son of an army officer, al-fārābī first studied Islamic jurisprudence and music in Bukhara then moved to Marv where he began to study logic with a Nestorian Christian monk, Yūḥannā Ibn Ḥaylān. While in his early twenties, al-fārābī went to Baghdad and continued to study logic and philosophy with Ibn Ḥaylān. At the same time, he improved his grasp of Arabic by studying with the prominent philologist Ibn al-sarrāj and is said to have followed the courses of the famous Nestorian Christian translator and student of Aristotle, Mattā ibn Yūnus. Around , al-fārābī left Baghdad for Byzantium (maybe reaching Constantinople), where he remained for about eight years studying Greek sciences and philosophy. On his return to Baghdad, he busied himself with teaching and writing until political upheavals in 942 forced him to seek refuge in Damascus. Two or three years later, political turmoil there drove him to Egypt where he stayed until returning to Damascus a little over a year before his death. 1 His writings, extraordinary in their breadth as well as their deep learning, extend through all of the sciences and embrace every part of philosophy. Al-Fārābī s interest in mathematics is evidenced in commentaries on the Elements of Euclid and the Almagest of Ptolemy, as well as in several writings on the history and theory of music. Indeed, his Kitāb al-mūsīqā al-kabīr (Large Book on Music) may well be the most significant work in Arabic on that subject. He also wrote numerous commentaries on Aristotle s logic, was knowledgeable about the Stagirite s physical writings, composed a commentary of sorts on the Metaphysics, and is credited with an extensive commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics that is no longer extant. In addition to writing explicit accounts of Plato s and Aristotle s philosophy as well as an essay in which he struggles to harmonize their teaching, he composed a commentary on Plato s Laws, and several works in which he draws freely upon both of these looming figures. As the first philosopher within the tradition of Islam to explore the challenge to traditional philosophy presented by revealed religion, especially in its claims that the Creator provides for human well-being by means of an inspired prophet legislator, 1 See Mahdi Muhsin S. (1971), Al-Fārābī, in Gillispie Charles C. (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Charles Scribner s son, New York, vol. IV, p ; and id. (1990), Al-Fārābī s Imperfect State, in Journal of the American Oriental Society 110/4, p
4 474 Charles E. Butterworth al-fārābī has come to be known as the founder of Islamic political philosophy. 2 Leo Strauss is surely the first to have brought the political significance of al-fārābī s teaching to light, an accomplishment all the more noteworthy given how little was known about al-fārābī and his writings when Strauss was making these pathbreaking discoveries. 3 Even more striking, in an age in which we are accustomed to highly reliable critical editions of al-fārābī s works based on the careful compilation of several manuscripts, is the truncated and sometimes incomprehensible character of the writings to which Strauss had access. That he somehow cut through such confusing texts and managed to make sense of al-fārābī s teaching is therefore all the more remarkable. Now al-fārābī is not a founder who turns his back on the past. Indeed, in the first part of the Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle the Attainment of Happiness he seeks to pinpoint the common concerns that link religion and revealed law with pagan philosophy in its highest form, namely, the writings of Plato and Aristotle. That effort finds an echo in another writing, the Selected Aphorisms (also known, probably erroneously, as Aphorisms of the Statesman) in two ways. First, the opening words of the treatise indicate that al-fārābī draws upon what the ancients that is, Plato and Aristotle have to say about governing, but governing with a view to a particular purpose. As he, or perhaps a scribe, puts it, the aphorisms selected and presented in this work: comprise the roots of many of the sayings of the Ancients concerning that by which cities ought to be governed and made prosperous, the ways of life of their inhabitants improved, and they be led toward happiness. 4 For al-fārābī, the goal is to govern cities so that they become prosperous and that the lives of their citizens are improved, improved in the sense that they be led toward happiness. Second, the overlap between this work and the Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, especially the Attainment of Happiness, indicated by these words 5 is made 2 See Mahdi Muhsin S. (2001), Alfarabi and the Foundation of Islamic Political Philosophy: Essays in Interpretation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p See Strauss Leo (1995), Philosophy and Law: Contributions to the Understanding of Maimonides and His Predecessors, tr. Adler Eve, SUNY Press, Albany (NY), especially chap See Butterworth Charles E. (tr.) (2001), Alfarabi, The Political Writings: Selected Aphorisms and Other Texts, Cornell University Press, Ithaca (NY), p. 11, 2-5; for the Arabic text, see al-fārābī Abū Naṣr (1971), Fuṣūl Muntaza a, éd. Najjar Fawzi, Dar al-mashreq, Beirut, p. 23, 3-5. The terminology may well remind the reader of Islam and its revealed law, but that is not what al-fārābī says. 5 Consider the opening words of the Attainment of Happiness: The human things through which nations and citizens of cities attain earthly happiness in this life and supreme happiness in the life beyond are of four kinds: theoretical virtues, deliberative virtues, moral virtues, and practical arts, in Mahdi Muhsin (tr.) (2001), Alfarabi, Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, rev. edition, Cornell University Press, Ithaca (NY), Mélanges de l Université Saint-Joseph 61 (2008)
5 What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle? 475 even more explicit toward the end of the Selected Aphorisms where a long and very important passage in Aphorism 94 paraphrases sections of the Attainment of Happiness. Yet al-fārābī seems always alert to the difficulties religion and revealed law pose for the older approach to politics. For example, in the fifth chapter of the Enumeration of the Sciences, an ostensibly popular writing, he sets forth two accounts of the old political science. Both presuppose the validity of the traditional separation between the practical and the theoretical sciences, but neither is adequate for the radically new situation created by the appearance of revealed religion. The two accounts explain in detail the actions and ways of life required for sound political rule to flourish, but are utterly silent about opinions especially the kind of theoretical opinions now set forth in religion and thus unable to point to the kind of rulership needed now that religion holds away. 6 Nor can either speak about the opinions or actions addressed by the jurisprudence and theology of revealed religion. These tasks require a political science that combines theoretical and practical science along with prudence and shows how they are to be ordered in the soul of the ruler. Such a view of political science is presented in The Book of Religion. It is a political science that is a part of philosophy. Yet, even as al-fārābī offers this redemptive vision of political science, he suggests that religion and revelation must also be put into perspective or considered anew and then goes about explaining religion in such a manner that its theoretical and practical subordination to philosophy becomes manifest. Al-Fārābī s account of this subordination makes it seem perfectly reasonable, so reasonable that the limitations thereby placed on dialectical theology and jurisprudence appear to follow necessarily from it. 7 To this explanation of the way al-fārābī elaborates the relationship between the philosophy of the ancients and the new revelation, one might object that it relies too much on a presumption of harmony and agreement between Plato and Aristotle on these matters. We know, however, that the two differed about many minor and not so minor questions. This issue is addressed in the highly enigmatic Harmonization p. 13, 1; for the Arabic text, see al-fārābī Abū Naṣr (1345H), Kitāb Taḥṣīl al-sa āda, Maṭba at Majlis Dā irat al-ma ārif al- Uthmāniyya, Hyderabad, p. 2, See The Enumeration of the Sciences, chap. 5, 1-3 in Butterworth, Alfarabi, The Political Writings, p ; for the Arabic text, see al-fārābī Abū Naṣr (1949), Iḥṣā al- Ulūm, ed. Amīn Uthmān, Dār al-fikr al- Arabī, Cairo, p. 102, 4 107, 4. At the very outset of the Enumeration, al-fārābī signals the popular character of this work by noting that he intends to enumerate each of the well-known sciences ; ibid., p. 43, See Book of Religion, 5, 7-10, and 15-27, esp. 27, in Butterworth, Alfarabi, The Political Writings, p ; ; for the Arabic text, see al-fārābī Abū Naṣr (1968), Kitāb al-milla wa-nuṣūs Ukhrā, ed. Mahdi Muhsin, Dar al-mashreq, Beirut, 5, 7-10, and 15-27, esp. 27.
6 476 Charles E. Butterworth that is, The Harmonization of the Two Opinions of the Two Sages, Plato the Divine and Aristotle. Here, al-fārābī, desirous of putting an end to the disputes and discord among his contemporaries about the disagreement they claim to discern between the two eminent and distinguished sages, Plato and Aristotle, sets out to show that their opinions are in agreement, to remove doubt and suspicion from the hearts of those who look into their books, and to explain the places of uncertainty and the sources of doubt in their treatises. These goals, set forth in the opening words of the treatise, are surely most appealing. But do they not too readily discount or ignore simple facts manifest to any student of Plato and Aristotle? Almost as though it were an objection he had anticipated, al-fārābī s final observation at the beginning of the treatise affirms that such agreement or harmonization is among the most important [things] to be intent upon explaining and among the most beneficial to wish to expound upon and elucidate. 8 Al-Fārābī s task as founder of political philosophy within Islam is to develop a broader view of political science, one that takes religion into account without discounting what he has learned from the ancients about human aspirations. He does so by making judicious use of the authors whose names are most closely associated with that older, now supposedly obsolete, political science Plato and Aristotle. He does so, that is, by showing how their counsel even more, their wisdom remains ever needful, how the most important aspect of revelation the lawgiving that allows human beings to achieve ultimate happiness is, above all, a philosophical inquiry. This he accomplishes by approaching them and the differences between them in two quite distinct manners. Al-Fārābī s Two Approaches to Differences of Opinion Between Plato and Aristotle 1. A Declaration of Differences That Is Then Muted In the Attainment of Happiness, al-fārābī executes a series of inquiries that takes the reader from what is upon reflection quite obvious to an identification of subjects, arts, sciences, and actions that are anything but obvious. Beginning with the way we use words and what we mean by them, then moving to the way we form sentences 8 See The Harmonization of the Two opinions of the Two Sages: Plato the Divine and Aristotle, 1, in Butterworth, Alfarabi, The Political Writings, p. 125; for the Arabic text, see Najjar Fawzi M. and Mallet Dominique (ed. and tr.) (1999), Abū Naṣr al-fārābī, L Harmonie entre les opinions de Platon et d Aristote, Institut Français de Damas, Damascus, 1. Mélanges de l Université Saint-Joseph 61 (2008)
7 What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle? 477 and learn to engage in reasoning and next to the way such reasoning allows us to unfold or explain the world around us and even the principles that make it such as it is, al-fārābī reaches a point where he can identify the inquiry that permits such explanations and show how it is related to other inquiries. Whether denoted as true wisdom or highest wisdom and its acquisition as science, knowledge, or even philosophy, it is clear that this is what everyone would like to possess. And it has flourished in different places at different times, just as it has been neglected or forgotten. This knowledge or science, this practice of philosophy, differs from another important human pursuit religion in that it actually comes to know things by means of the intellect and insists upon firm demonstrative proofs, whereas religion remains at the level of imagining their similitude and is content merely to represent them in a persuasive manner. Science or philosophy and religion come together at the moment that the former leaves aside theoretical inquiry to concentrate on explaining the way things are to those not capable of seizing demonstrative arguments and, even more, on bringing those persons to act in ways beneficial for them. Differently stated, science or philosophy makes common cause with religion when theoretical investigation is replaced by practical considerations. Practical science or philosophy is also expressed in terms of similitudes and by means of persuasive speech. The laws or nomoi set down by lawgivers have their roots in theoretical philosophy, but are expressed in popular images. In this sense, the same thing is intended or meant when we speak of imam, philosopher, and lawgiver (the term is wāḍi al-nawāmīs) and even when we speak of philosopher, first ruler, king, lawgiver, and imam. 9 This at any rate is what we learn from true science and true philosophy: These things are philosophy when they are in the soul of the lawgiver. And when they are in the souls of the multitude, they are religion. For when the lawgiver knows these things, they are evident to him through certain insight, whereas what is established in the souls of the multitude is through an image and persuasion. 10 It is true science, true philosophy, and also true religion because the lawgiver who discovers and uses images and persuasion does so for the sake of the multitude. He knows with certainty the way things really are. Such is not the case with respect to the counterfeit philosopher, the vain philosopher, or the false philosopher. The threat each poses for true philosophy is constant, as is the danger that philosophy may fall into neglect and oblivion. For al-fārābī, true philosophy: 9 See Attainment, (also 51-56), in Mahdi, Alfarabi, Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, p (also, p ) ; Arabic text, al-fārābī, K. Taḥṣīl al-sa āda, p. 42, 11 44, 2 (also p. 37, 14 42, 11). 10 Attainment, 59, in ibid., p. 47; Arabic text, ibid., p. 44, I have modified the translation.
8 478 Charles E. Butterworth was handed down to us by the Greeks from Plato and Aristotle only. Both have given us an account of philosophy, but not without giving us also an account of the ways to it and of the ways to re-establish it when it becomes confused or extinct. 11 It is apparently for this reason that he can close the Attainment with the admonition: so let it be clear to you that their purpose is the same in what they presented and that they intended to present one and the same philosophy. 12 Unfortunately, the presentation of the philosophical teaching of each that follows does not corroborate this judgment. Plato s philosophical quest, at least according to al-fārābī, begins by inquiring into human perfection and thus into human happiness. It is a quest that leads him to investigate what kinds of knowledge make human beings happy and perfect and how such knowledge might be obtained. At first, the quest takes him through the practical arts and the knowledge that is generally accepted among humans. Finding these inadequate, he also investigates the qualities of soul praised by human beings and eventually hits upon the importance of love and friendship. These somehow lead him to philosophy and statesmanship, to the quest for what is truly good, and then to the discovery of the importance of conversation for instruction. 13 Even at such a point, however, he returns from this summit to the city and to the recognition that true philosophy and statesmanship are not valued there. Al-Fārābī s Plato constantly moves between investigations that take him away from the city and the concerns of the city back to the city and its needs. He finds repeatedly that what is true, just, and good is not appreciated in the city. But only after the investigation that leads him to recognize what a truly just city might be, namely, a city that will not lack anything that leads its citizens to happiness 14 and this inquiry is to be found in his book the Republic says al-fārābī 15 does Plato investigate the divine and natural beings as they are perceived by the intellect and known by means of that science. 16 In other words, al-fārābī s Plato moves from the city to the world of nature and to the principles on which it rests, not from reflection 11 Attainment, 63, in Mahdi, Alfarabi, Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, p ; Arabic text, al-fārābī, K. Taḥṣīl al-sa āda, p. 47, 3-8. I have modified the translation. 12 Attainment, 64, ibid., p. 50; Arabic text, ibid., p. 47, See The Philosophy of Plato, its Parts, the Ranks of Order of its Parts, from the Beginning to the End, Parts i-vi, in Mahdi, Alfarabi, Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, p ; for the Arabic text, see Gabrieli Franciscus (ed.) (1952), Alfarabius, Compendium Legum Platonis, Warburg Institute, London, p. 3, 4 16, Philosophy of Plato, 31, ibid., p. 65; Arabic text, ibid., p. 20, Philosophy of Plato, 32, in ibid., p. 65; Arabic text, ibid., p. 20, Philosophy of Plato, 33, in Mahdi, Alfarabi, Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, p ; Arabic text, Gabrieli, Alfarabius, Compendium Legum Platonis, p. 20, 16. Mélanges de l Université Saint-Joseph 61 (2008)
9 What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle? 479 on nature to one on political and human things. Yet his concentration on the political is important, for it alerts him or so al-fārābī asserts to the shortcomings of Socrates and the merits of Thrasymachus: He explained Thrasymachus method and made it known that Thrasymachus was more able than Socrates to form the character of the youth and instruct the multitude; Socrates possessed only the ability to conduct a scientific investigation of justice and the virtues, and a power of love, but did not possess the ability to form the character of the youth and the multitude; and the philosopher, the king, and the lawgiver ought to be able to use both methods; the Socratic method with the elect, and Thrasyumachus method with the youth and the multitude. 17 Al-Fārābī s Aristotle does not proceed in the same manner. It is not clear, moreover, that his philosophy is the same as that of al-fārābī s Plato. Whereas the philosophy of his Plato starts from, and constantly returns to, the human things, that of his Aristotle starts from the principles on which human things are based and moves from them to the principles governing the universe. Though he returns from time to time to speak about human affairs, al-fārābī s Aristotle is much more rooted in natural investigations and in what natural things stand on in what might be called the metaphysical. The difference between the two is stated clearly at the outset of the Philosophy of Aristotle: Aristotle sees the perfection of man as Plato sees it and more. However, because man s perfection is not self-evident or easy to explain by a demonstration leading to certainty, he saw fit to start from a position anterior to that from which Plato had started. 18 In other words, though there is a difference between the two, it is a mere procedural difference, one rooted in Aristotle s concern to posit certain premises or to lay bare certain suppositions that Plato had neglected. At the end of the exposition, however, al-fārābī lets slip if it is accurate to say that al-fārābī ever lets anything slip; after all, this is the author of whom no less an authority than Maimonides said that his thoughts are finer than fine flour and are to be treated accordingly the following: It has become evident that the knowledge that he [Aristotle] investigated at the outset just because he loved to do so, and inspected for the sake of explaining 17 Philosophy of Plato, 36, in ibid., p ; Arabic text, ibid., p. 22, 2-8. I have modified the translation. 18 See The Philosophy of Aristotle, The Parts of his Philosophy, the Ranks of Order of its Parts, the Position from which he Started and the One he Reached, 1, in Mahdi, Alfarabi, Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, p ; for the Arabic text, see al-fārābī Abū Naṣr (1961), Falsafat Arisṭūṭālīs wa-ajzā Falsafatihi wa-marātib Ajzā ihā wa-al-mawḍa alladhī minhu Ibtada a wa-ilayhi Intāhā, ed. Mahdi Muhsin, Dār Majallat Shi r, Beirut, p. 59, 5-7.
10 480 Charles E. Butterworth the truth about the above-mentioned pursuits, has turned out to be necessary for attaining to the political activity for the sake of which man is made. 19 Not gentle buttressing of Plato, then, nor even an attempt to provide the necessary antecedents for Plato s investigation which is supposed to be one and the same as his but a different tack entirely, one pursued out of simple love of learning, prompts Aristotle s difference. Nonetheless, that inquiry, like Plato s, culminates in an understanding of political life that fosters human perfection. Sound political practice, then, must be based on a correct apprehension of the way things work in the world of nature and on awareness of how human conduct can be brought into line with that order. This account of the way the philosophical pursuits of Plato and Aristotle mesh, despite major differences, is central to the claim that they are one and the same. Another way to see their common purpose is to consider what al-fārābī has to say about them, though mentioning them by name only in passing, in the Selected Aphorisms. 2. Passing Over Potential Differences in Silence In many of his writings, al-fārābī s procedure seems to imitate that of his Plato. He starts on one course of investigation, pursues it for a certain moment, then pauses to reflect on where it has led, and declares that it is necessary to begin the investigation from another perspective. Nowhere is this more evident than in Aphorism 94, the longest in the Selected Aphorisms and the only one to be accorded a title, namely, on the uses of the theoretical part in philosophy and that it is necessary for the practical part in [different] ways. After setting out that a grasp of the theoretical virtues, as well as the virtues of calculation, allows one to have knowledge of the happiness that is truly happiness, al-fārābī notes that this does not come to be as a whole except through pursuing theory and transferring from degree to degree and level to level, then goes on to explain what he means. 20 An example may not be amiss: The one who wishes to learn theoretical philosophy begins with numbers, then ascends to magnitudes, then to the rest of the things to which numbers and quantities pertain essentially like optics and moving magnitudes then to the celestial bodies and music, to weights, and to mechanics. [ ] And he ascends little 19 Philosophy of Aristotle, 99, in Mahdi, Alfarabi, Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, p ; Arabic text, al-fārābī, Falsafat Arisṭūṭālīs, ed. Mahdi, p. 132, Reading with Mahdi s correction of the text (see Mahdi, Alfarabi, Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, p. 147 n. 9 to 99). 20 For this aphorism, see the appendix. Mélanges de l Université Saint-Joseph 61 (2008)
11 What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle? 481 by little in the things that need matter to be understood and conceived of until he comes to the celestial bodies. Then, afterwards, it is necessary for him to introduce principles other than the principles of what, by what, and how to aid him in using the things that it is difficult or impossible to come to intellect unless they come into matter. [ ] Then he transfers to knowledge of the reasons for the existence of natural bodies and the search for their essences, substances, and reasons. When he ends up at the celestial bodies, the rational soul, and the active intellect, he transfers again to another rank. So it is necessary for him to inquire theoretically into the principles of their existence until he becomes aware of principles that are not natural. [ ] He also comes to a mid-point between two sciences the science of natural things and the science of what is after the natural things in the ranking of investigation and instruction. [ ] The human being has already come close to obtaining the level and degree of theoretical knowledge by which he gains happiness. And he obtains theory from both directions until he ends up at a being that cannot possibly have any of these principles at all. On one level, the point is quite simple: it is most difficult to acquire theoretical knowledge. Yet the problem posed at the end of the Selected Aphorisms, as at the end of the Attainment of Happiness, is that there are many who claim to have theoretical knowledge or philosophy and thus to be able to rule wisely, even to make good laws and yet are actually bereft of it. Precisely because the multitude does not know how to distinguish between the true philosopher or the true recipient of revelation and the false one, precisely because the who fortuitously divines or hits upon the right solution, resembles the one who truly knows, it is necessary to have a grasp of theoretical principles. Or, as al-fārābī puts it even more poignantly, it is necessary to have knowledge about the nature of the possible. This belongs to the one schooled in natural science alone. The Selected Aphorisms leads to this understanding by gently mixing the teaching of Plato and Aristotle, by presenting the teaching of both as though it were the same. Indeed, as already noted, the opening words of the treatise, which acts as a kind of sub-title or even a scribe s summary, explains its purpose succinctly: Selected aphorisms that comprise the roots of many of the sayings of the Ancients concerning that by which cities ought to be governed and made prosperous, the lives of their people improved, and they be led toward happiness. The treatise consists of either 96 or 100 aphorisms, these last four contested aphorisms being found only in the most recent and least reliable of the six manuscripts. In the work as a whole, al-fārābī begins with, then develops, a comparison between the health of the soul and that of the body. Somewhat abruptly, he starts his exposition by defining the health of each and then explains how the health of the more important of the two that of the soul may be obtained and its sickness repulsed. The first
12 482 Charles E. Butterworth word of the Selected Aphorisms is simply soul, while the last is virtue. In the 96 aphorisms occurring between these two words, al-fārābī first enters upon a detailed examination of the soul then provides an account and justification of the well-ordered political regime which the soul needs in order to attain its perfection. At no point in the treatise does he speak of prophecy or of the prophet or legislator. The terms are not even evoked. He is equally silent with respect to the philosopher and mentions philosophy only two times, both in the famous antepenultimate aphorism (aph. 94) the same one in which he mentions, for the only time, the word revelation. On the other hand, al-fārābī speaks constantly throughout these aphorisms of the statesman (madanī) hence the now contested title, Aphorisms of the Statesman and of the king. The ancients referred to above are, of course, none other than Plato and Aristotle. Al-Fārābī calls upon them to identify the political order that will achieve human happiness. The individual who succeeds in understanding how a political community can be well-ordered whether this person is a statesman or a king will do for the citizens what the physician does for individual sick persons and will accomplish for the citizens who follow his rules what the prophet accomplishes for those who follow his. Nonetheless, to attain such an understanding, one must first be fully acquainted with the soul as well as with political life. More precisely, the virtuous political regime is the one in which the souls of all the inhabitants are as healthy as possible: the one who cures souls is the statesman, and he is also called the king (aph. 4). This may explain why such a patently political treatise contains two long discussions of the soul. One, very similar to the Nicomachean Ethics, explains all the faculties of the soul except for the theoretical part of the rational faculty (aphs. 6-21). The other analyzes this theoretical part as well as its companion, the practical part, by discussing the intellectual virtues (aphs ). Again, the discussion proceeds from a perspective highly reminiscent of the Nicomachean Ethics. This may explain as well why such a political treatise also contains an investigation of the sound and erroneous opinions with respect to the principles of being and to happiness (aphs ). This investigation is couched in terms such as to call Plato s Socrates to mind, but that is not the point. The point, rather, is that al-fārābī sets forth here the premises on which a sound political teaching may be founded. To draw attention to the unscrupulous who pretend to be lawgivers without having the wherewithal to present sound laws is a necessary task to be sure. But it is not sufficient. Al-Fārābī must also provide criteria by which to judge the soundness of laws, especially of that law governing his own community. But he must do so in a manner that prepares the investigator yet does not alarm the current exegetes of the law or laws, the jurists, or those who see their function as defending the revelation on which the laws are based the theologians. Clarity about Mélanges de l Université Saint-Joseph 61 (2008)
13 What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle? 483 the human soul, how things are, as well as how they come into being, and the end of human existence is fundamental to such a task. These three groups of aphorisms constitute a little less than two-thirds of the treatise. Void of formal structure or divisions, the treatise unfolds in such a manner that each moral discussion is preceded and followed by other groups of aphorisms that go more deeply into its political teaching. Thus, the discussion of the soul in general is preceded by a series of analogies between the soul and the body as well as between the soul and the body politic (aphs. 1-5). It is followed first by a discussion devoted to domestic political economy (aphs ) and then by an inquiry into the king in truth (aphs ). The second discussion of the soul, preceded by these three aphorisms, is followed by an inquiry into the virtuous city (aphs ); that inquiry vividly calls to mind discussions raised in Plato s Republic. The discussion of the virtuous city precedes the investigation of sound and erroneous opinions about natural phenomena and ultimate happiness, and it is followed by the account of the virtuous regime (aphs ). Subsequent to each moral digression, the tone of the discussion seems to become more elevated, almost as though the moral teaching were the driving force for the political teaching of the treatise or were at least giving it direction. In this sense, Aristotle s inquiries into the physical and psychological principles of human conduct offer the grounding for Plato s loftier queries. To be sure, al-fārābī treats both Plato and Aristotle quite loosely in this work. But the pattern of moving from one to the other cannot be ignored, especially given the image he provides in Aphorism 94. Such an explanation of the general structure of al-fārābī s Selected Aphorisms and identification of its major themes reveals something more about al-fārābī s general teaching and the way this fits with his use of Plato and Aristotle. First, by allowing the aphorisms about household economy and the king in truth to interrupt his explanation of the human soul and its faculties (aphs and 33-56), al-fārābī underlines the difference between life in a small unit like the family where moral virtue is sufficient and life in a larger surrounding a city or kingdom where theoretical understanding and practical wisdom are necessary. It is not practical to attempt to provide a full account of the soul s faculties especially of its intellectual faculty before pointing to the needs that arise in different kinds of human association and thus suggesting the inadequacy of simple patriarchal rule. Second, once the human soul has been fully explained, thus permitting al-fārābī to turn to the problem of providing for it in a proper political order, the fact that he pauses in the middle of that discussion and turns to aphorisms that discuss the principles of being and opinions about human happiness suggests the limits of the city per se and why lawgiving is more suited for an association of cities for a nation.
14 484 Charles E. Butterworth But this is not a lesson to be learned from the ancients. It is one unique to his own setting, one he addresses by implying that the ancients are as good guides for the larger form of virtuous political community, the regime, as for the smaller, the city. Equally important, however, is the repeated admission in the Selected Aphorisms, as in the Philosophy of Plato and the Philosophy of Aristotle indeed, in the Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle as a whole that the knowledge constantly sought after and requisite for ultimate clarity about all of these issues is not available and that recourse to philosophy is as necessary now as it always has been. The admission challenges the claims of revelation in no way. Rather, it shows why those claims, set forth as they are in religion, can make sense only when expounded by a philosophical understanding similar to the one al-fārābī has shown to be that of Plato and Aristotle one that accounts for human existence in its entirety. Conclusion This brushes up against the limits of what we can claim to learn from al-fārābī about Plato and Aristotle with respect to lawgiving. Were we to go further, we might be forced to find some means of justifying the image of Aristotle that he presents in the Harmonization, that is, of an Aristotle who could seriously be presented as the author of a work like the Theology of Aristotle. 21 Fortunately, it is not necessary to go so far. Al-Fārābī brings Plato and Aristotle together in the Attainment of Happiness and the Selected Aphorisms, but also in the rest of his teaching, by showing how their concerns are at the core of sound politics. Behind his claim that the idea of the philosopher, first ruler, king, law-giver, and imam is but a single idea is the notion that truth is one. While the goal of the philosopher is to discern truth, that of the others is to set it before the citizens in a manner they can fathom and then pursue. After all, this is what allows a discerning governor to bring about prosperous cities and to institute an educational system that improves the way of life of the inhabitants. Only in this way, one that includes proper attention to law but also to character formation or to the shaping of virtuous souls, will it be possible to lead the citizens toward happiness in this realm. This is what al-fārābī tries to indicate in his different writings. It is also the goal common to Plato and Aristotle. To discern the merit of such a teaching, one must understand the way things are that is, one must have achieved theoretical virtue or excellence. To succeed in bringing it about, one must have a clear idea about how to persuade human beings how to motivate them to do what is good for the com- 21 See Harmonization, 56, 66, and 75, in Butterworth, Alfarabi, The Political Writings. Mélanges de l Université Saint-Joseph 61 (2008)
15 What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle? 485 munity. This skill comes about from deliberative virtue or excellence, and it depends on a clear grasp of the human good and the strength to strive for it on moral virtue. The ability to persuade, to capture in images clearly discernible to most citizens, what this good is and why it must be pursued certainly depends on the practical art of rhetoric. And the lawgiver or leader imam who carries out such a task may also have need of another practical art, that of coining linguistic images that move people to long for good and noble actions even as they shun or abhor their opposites. In sum, al-fārābī s ability to bring together the philosophic pursuits of a Plato with the analyses of an Aristotle allows him to point to what is common to the philosopher, first ruler or founder of a regime, king, lawgiver, and imam. His investigations of the ancient philosophers allow him to preserve philosophy in his own time and, perhaps more important, show why it must necessarily guide all present and future inquiry into religion and lawgiving.
16 486 Charles E. Butterworth Appendix Abū Naṣr al-fārābī Selected Aphorisms (aph. 94) 22 (94) Aphorism. On the uses of the theoretical part in philosophy and that it is necessary for the practical part in [different] ways. One of them is that practice is virtuous and correct only when a human being has [a] become truly cognizant of the virtues that are truly virtues, [b] become truly cognizant of the virtues that are presumed to be virtues yet are not like that, [c] habituated himself to the actions of the virtues that are truly virtues so that they become one of his traits, [d] become cognizant of the ranks of the beings and what they deserve, [e] set each of them down in its level, [f] given it the full share of its right namely, the extent of what it was given and of its rank among the ranks of being, [g] preferred what ought to be preferred, [h] avoided what ought to be avoided, and [i] not preferred what is presumed to be preferable nor avoided what is presumed ought to be avoided. This is a state that is not attained or perfected except after becoming sophisticated; perfecting cognizance by means of demonstration; and becoming perfect in the natural sciences, what follows upon them, and what is after them according to rank and order, so that he finally comes to knowledge of the happiness that is truly happiness namely, that which is sought for its own sake and at no period of time is sought for anything else and is cognizant of how the theoretical virtues and the virtues of calculation are a reason and principle for bringing about the practical virtues and the arts. This does not come to be as a whole except through pursuing theory and transferring from degree to degree and level to level. It is not possible in any other way. That is, the one who wishes to learn theoretical philosophy begins with numbers, then ascends to magnitudes, then to the rest of the things to which numbers and quantities pertain essentially like optics and moving magnitudes then to the celestial bodies and music, to weights, and to mechanics. These are things that are understood and conceived of without matter. And he ascends little by little in the things that need matter to be understood and conceived of until he comes to the celestial bodies. Then, afterward, it is necessary for him to introduce principles other than the principles of what, by what, and how to aid him in using the things that it is difficult or impossible to come to intellect unless they come into matter. They are 22 For the Arabic text, see al-fārābī, Fuṣūl Muntaza a, éd. Najjar. Mélanges de l Université Saint-Joseph 61 (2008)
17 What Might We Learn From al-fārābī About Plato and Aristotle? 487 adjacent to, and midway between, the genus that has no principles of existence other than what it is and the genus for whose species the four principles exist. 23 The natural principles emerge for him, and he pursues them and makes a theoretical inquiry into the natural beings and their principles of instruction until he comes to the principles of existence. What he procures of the principles of existence comes to be a ladder and principles of instruction for him. So the principles of existence he has procured come to be principles of instruction only in relation to two things. 24 Then he transfers to knowledge of the reasons for the existence of natural bodies and the search for their essences, substances, and reasons. When he ends up at the celestial bodies, the rational soul, and the active intellect, he transfers again to another rank. So it is necessary for him to inquire theoretically into the principles of their existence until he becomes aware of principles that are not natural. Thus, what he has procured of the principles of existence of that third rank also comes to be principles of instruction for these beings that are of more perfect existence than the natural ones. He also comes to a midpoint between two sciences the science of natural things and the science of what is after the natural things in the ranking of investigation and instruction. He also becomes aware of the principles for the sake of which they were brought into being, as well as of the goal and perfection for the sake of which the human being was brought into being. He knows [a] that the natural principles that are in the human being and in the world are insufficient for the human being to come by them to the perfection he was brought into being to obtain and [b] that the human being needs intellectual principles by which he strives toward that perfection. The human being has already come close to obtaining the level and degree of theoretical knowledge by which he gains happiness. And he obtains theory from both directions until he ends up at a being that cannot possibly have any of these principles at all. Rather, it is the first being and the first principle for all the beings mentioned previously; in ways no defect intrudes upon, but rather in the most perfect of the ways by which something is a principle for the beings, it is the one by which, from which, and for which they exist. He thus attains cognizance of the ultimate reasons for the beings. This is divine theoretical inquiry into the beings. In addition, he is always investigating the purpose for the sake of which the human being was brought into being namely, the perfection incumbent upon the human being to obtain and all the things by which the human being obtains that perfection. Then he is able to 23 That is, in addition to the three principles identified in the first sentence of this paragraph, the principle of end for what. 24 The two things in question seem to be the two genera: namely, the genus having no principles of existence other than those for its own existence, and the genus that has the four principles of existence.
18 488 Charles E. Butterworth transfer to the practical part, and it is possible for him to begin to practice what he ought to practice. Another way is for someone to be given the practical part by a revelation that directs him toward a determination of each thing that he ought to prefer or avoid. They are both called knowers, for the name knowledge is homonymous for both of them just as it is homonymous for the practitioner of natural science and the diviner who relates what comes to be with respect to possible things. That is, the diviner does not have the ability to know all the individual possible things, because they are unending; and it is absurd that knowledge would encompass what is unending. Yet he has the ability to set down knowledge of some possible thing that happens to occur to his mind or to the mind of one asking him about it. Because knowledge of some possible thing is knowledge contrary to the nature of the possible, the diviner does not have knowledge about the nature of the possible. Rather, knowledge about the nature of the possible belongs to the practitioner of natural science. Therefore the knowledge of both of them does not come from one substance but the two are, rather, mutually contrary. The case is similar for someone who has become perfect in theoretical science and someone who has had revealed to him how to determine the actions of the inhabitants of cities or of a city without having cognizance of anything pertaining to theoretical science. Nor is there a link or true congruence between one who has received revelation and who is perfect in theoretical knowledge, and one who has received revelation without having become perfect in theoretical knowledge. Rather, the congruence is in name alone. Mélanges de l Université Saint-Joseph 61 (2008)
One. Introduction State University of New York Press, Albany
One Introduction Now more than at any time for centuries, Alfarabi, a tenth-century Muslim political philosopher, is especially timely. This book is intended as an introduction to Alfarabi s thought not
More informationRevised Strauss' Farabi, Shokri, 2(2)-3.pdf
Free University of Berlin From the SelectedWorks of Alexander M Shokri 2013 Revised Strauss' Farabi, Shokri, 2(2)-3.pdf Alexander M Shokri, Free University of Berlin Available at: https://works.bepress.com/alexander-m-shokri/1/
More informationWisdom in Aristotle and Aquinas From Metaphysics to Mysticism Edmond Eh University of Saint Joseph, Macau
Volume 12, No 2, Fall 2017 ISSN 1932-1066 Wisdom in Aristotle and Aquinas From Metaphysics to Mysticism Edmond Eh University of Saint Joseph, Macau edmond_eh@usj.edu.mo Abstract: This essay contains an
More informationPhilosophy and Jurisprudence in Islam
Volume 7, No 1, Spring 2012 ISSN 1932-1066 Philosophy and Jurisprudence in Islam A Hermeneutic Perspective Charles E. Butterworth University of Maryland cebworth@umd.edu Abstract: This essay provides a
More informationPractical Wisdom and Politics
Practical Wisdom and Politics In discussing Book I in subunit 1.6, you learned that the Ethics specifically addresses the close relationship between ethical inquiry and politics. At the outset, Aristotle
More information- 1 - Outline of NICOMACHEAN ETHICS, Book I Book I--Dialectical discussion leading to Aristotle's definition of happiness: activity in accordance
- 1 - Outline of NICOMACHEAN ETHICS, Book I Book I--Dialectical discussion leading to Aristotle's definition of happiness: activity in accordance with virtue or excellence (arete) in a complete life Chapter
More informationAVERROES THE BOOK OF THE DECISIVE TREATISE, DETERMINING THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE LAW AND WISDOM. Translated, with introduction and notes, by
AVERROES THE BOOK OF THE DECISIVE TREATISE, DETERMINING THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE LAW AND WISDOM Translated, with introduction and notes, by Charles E. Butterworth In the name of God, the Merciful and
More informationJewish and Muslim Thinkers in the Islamic World: Three Parallels. Peter Adamson (LMU Munich)
Jewish and Muslim Thinkers in the Islamic World: Three Parallels Peter Adamson (LMU Munich) Our Protagonists: 9 th -10 th Century Iraq Al-Kindī, d. after 870 Saadia Gaon, d. 942 Al-Rāzī d.925 Our Protagonists:
More informationKnowledge in Plato. And couple of pages later:
Knowledge in Plato The science of knowledge is a huge subject, known in philosophy as epistemology. Plato s theory of knowledge is explored in many dialogues, not least because his understanding of the
More informationAVERROES, THE DECISIVE TREATISE (C. 1180) 1
1 Primary Source 1.5 AVERROES, THE DECISIVE TREATISE (C. 1180) 1 Islam arose in the seventh century when Muhammad (c. 570 632) received what he considered divine revelations urging him to spread a new
More informationVol 2 Bk 7 Outline p 486 BOOK VII. Substance, Essence and Definition CONTENTS. Book VII
Vol 2 Bk 7 Outline p 486 BOOK VII Substance, Essence and Definition CONTENTS Book VII Lesson 1. The Primacy of Substance. Its Priority to Accidents Lesson 2. Substance as Form, as Matter, and as Body.
More informationThe Divine Nature. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 3-11) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian J.
The Divine Nature from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 3-11) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian J. Shanley (2006) Question 3. Divine Simplicity Once it is grasped that something exists,
More informationPeter L.P. Simpson January, 2015
1 This translation of the Prologue of the Ordinatio of the Venerable Inceptor, William of Ockham, is partial and in progress. The prologue and the first distinction of book one of the Ordinatio fill volume
More informationThe Middle Path: A Case for the Philosophical Theologian. Leo Strauss roots the vitality of Western civilization in the ongoing conflict between
Lee Anne Detzel PHI 8338 Revised: November 1, 2004 The Middle Path: A Case for the Philosophical Theologian Leo Strauss roots the vitality of Western civilization in the ongoing conflict between philosophy
More informationDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY THE ILLOGIC OF FAITH: FEAR AND TREMBLING IN LIGHT OF MODERNISM SUBMITTED TO THE GENTLE READER FOR SPRING CONFERENCE
DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY THE ILLOGIC OF FAITH: FEAR AND TREMBLING IN LIGHT OF MODERNISM SUBMITTED TO THE GENTLE READER FOR SPRING CONFERENCE BY MARK BOONE DALLAS, TEXAS APRIL 3, 2004 I. Introduction Soren
More informationKnowledge and True Opinion in Plato s Meno
Knowledge and True Opinion in Plato s Meno Ariel Weiner In Plato s dialogue, the Meno, Socrates inquires into how humans may become virtuous, and, corollary to that, whether humans have access to any form
More informationBrague, Rémi. The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea, trans. Lydia G. Cochrane (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).
Islamic Political Philosophy Bibliography Andrew F. March Introduction By political philosophy we mean not all political thought or theory in the Islamic tradition, but the specific tradition formed by
More informationLecture 9. Knowledge and the House of Wisdom
Lecture 9 Knowledge and the House of Wisdom Review Aim of last four lectures To examine some of the mechanisms by which the regions of the Islamic empire came to be constituted as a culture region Looking
More informationPhil Aristotle. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Phil 290 - Aristotle Instructor: Jason Sheley To sum up the method 1) Human beings are naturally curious. 2) We need a place to begin our inquiry. 3) The best place to start is with commonly held beliefs.
More informationYou may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages of this question paper until instructed that you may do so by the Invigilator
PHILOSOPHY TRIPOS Part II FRIDAY 25 May 2018 09.00 12.00 Paper 5 PHILOSOPHY IN THE LONG MIDDLE AGES Answer three questions, including at least one from each section. You are permitted to write on an author
More informationTestimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Introduction
24 Testimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Abstract: In this paper, I address Linda Zagzebski s analysis of the relation between moral testimony and understanding arguing that Aquinas
More informationHenry of Ghent on Divine Illumination
MP_C12.qxd 11/23/06 2:29 AM Page 103 12 Henry of Ghent on Divine Illumination [II.] Reply [A. Knowledge in a broad sense] Consider all the objects of cognition, standing in an ordered relation to each
More informationThe Philosophy Of Al Farabi And Its Influence On Medieval Thought By Robert Hammond
The Philosophy Of Al Farabi And Its Influence On Medieval Thought By Robert Hammond If you are looking for a ebook The Philosophy Of Al Farabi And Its Influence On Medieval Thought by Robert Hammond in
More informationDuns Scotus on Divine Illumination
MP_C13.qxd 11/23/06 2:29 AM Page 110 13 Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination [Article IV. Concerning Henry s Conclusion] In the fourth article I argue against the conclusion of [Henry s] view as follows:
More informationAl-Ghazali and Epistemology
Al-Ghazali and Epistemology Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali (1058-1111 CE), known as Algazel in Europe Born in Tus in northeastern Persia, then part of the Seljuk empire Studied law and theology in Nishapur and Isfahan,
More informationYou may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages of this question paper until instructed that you may do so by the Invigilator
PHILOSOPHY TRIPOS Part II Thursday 1 June 2017 09.00 12.00 Paper 5 PHILOSOPHY IN THE LONG MIDDLE AGES Answer three questions, including at least one from each section. You are permitted to write on an
More information2 General Introduction
GENERAL INTRODUCTION Over the decades since the first publication of the Sourcebook (1963), various events have brought to light the uneasy relation between religion and politics. Conflicts between Islamic
More informationIntroduction. 1 Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, n.d.), 7.
Those who have consciously passed through the field of philosophy would readily remember the popular saying to beginners in this discipline: philosophy begins with the act of wondering. To wonder is, first
More information270 Now that we have settled these issues, we should answer the first question [n.
Ordinatio prologue, q. 5, nn. 270 313 A. The views of others 270 Now that we have settled these issues, we should answer the first question [n. 217]. There are five ways to answer in the negative. [The
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy As soon as Sophie had closed the gate behind her she opened the envelope. It contained only a slip of paper no bigger than envelope. It read: Who are you? Nothing else, only
More informationAL-FARABI S PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
Educational Research International ISSN-L: 2307-3713, ISSN: 2307-3721 Vol. 1 No. 2 April 2013 AL-FARABI S PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Dr. Muhammad Rauf 1, Dr. Mushtaq Ahmad 2, Dr. Zafar Iqbal 3 1 Institute
More informationOn Truth Thomas Aquinas
On Truth Thomas Aquinas Art 1: Whether truth resides only in the intellect? Objection 1. It seems that truth does not reside only in the intellect, but rather in things. For Augustine (Soliloq. ii, 5)
More informationCHAPTER THREE ON SEEING GOD THROUGH HIS IMAGE IMPRINTED IN OUR NATURAL POWERS
BONAVENTURE, ITINERARIUM, TRANSL. O. BYCHKOV 21 CHAPTER THREE ON SEEING GOD THROUGH HIS IMAGE IMPRINTED IN OUR NATURAL POWERS 1. The two preceding steps, which have led us to God by means of his vestiges,
More informationPeter L.P. Simpson December, 2012
1 This translation of the Prologue of the Ordinatio (aka Opus Oxoniense) of Blessed John Duns Scotus is complete. It is based on volume one of the critical edition of the text by the Scotus Commission
More informationReview of Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics by David Bronstein
Marquette University e-publications@marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 4-1-2017 Review of Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics by David
More informationLogic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE
CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE Section 1. A Mediate Inference is a proposition that depends for proof upon two or more other propositions, so connected together by one or
More informationHave you ever sought God? Do you have any idea of God? Do you believe that God exist?
St. Anselm s Ontological Argument for the Existence of God Rex Jasper V. Jumawan Fr. Dexter Veloso Introduction Have you ever sought God? Do you have any idea of God? Do you believe that God exist? Throughout
More informationTHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION AND ARISTOTELIAN THEOLOGY TODAY
Science and the Future of Mankind Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 99, Vatican City 2001 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv99/sv99-berti.pdf THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION
More informationFaith and Reason in the Middle Ages (BLHS 105) Fall 2018
Prof. Jonathan Ray Jsr46@georgetown.edu New North 128 Faith and Reason in the Middle Ages (BLHS 105) Fall 2018 Course Description: The relation between faith and reason is one of the perennial issues in
More informationCRITICAL REVIEW OF AVICENNA S THEORY OF PROPHECY
29 Al-Hikmat Volume 30 (2010) p.p. 29-36 CRITICAL REVIEW OF AVICENNA S THEORY OF PROPHECY Gulnaz Shaheen Lecturer in Philosophy Govt. College for Women, Gulberg, Lahore, Pakistan. Abstract. Avicenna played
More informationVirtue Ethics. A Basic Introductory Essay, by Dr. Garrett. Latest minor modification November 28, 2005
Virtue Ethics A Basic Introductory Essay, by Dr. Garrett Latest minor modification November 28, 2005 Some students would prefer not to study my introductions to philosophical issues and approaches but
More informationRichard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING
1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process
More informationIslamic political philosophy: prophecy, revelation, and the divine law
Islamic political philosophy: prophecy, revelation, and the divine law Ludmila BÎRSAN, MA, Faculty of Philosophy and Social Political Sciences Applied Philosophy and Cultural Management University AL.
More informationTouchstones Discussion Project
Touchstones Alif Readings from the Arab Tradition Touchstones Discussion Project TOUCHSTONES ʾALIF Readings from the Arab Tradition Texts selected, translated, and edited by Howard Zeiderman and Stefanie
More informationJURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL THEORY II STUDY NOTES
JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL THEORY II STUDY NOTES TOPIC 1 THE PROVINCE OF NATURAL LAW CHAPTER ONE CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Objectives 3.0Main Content 3.1Meaning of Natural Law 3.2Essential Features of
More informationA CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment
A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE A Paper Presented to Dr. Douglas Blount Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for PHREL 4313 by Billy Marsh October 20,
More informationSocratic and Platonic Ethics
Socratic and Platonic Ethics G. J. Mattey Winter, 2017 / Philosophy 1 Ethics and Political Philosophy The first part of the course is a brief survey of important texts in the history of ethics and political
More informationQuestions on Book III of the De anima 1
Siger of Brabant Questions on Book III of the De anima 1 Regarding the part of the soul by which it has cognition and wisdom, etc. [De an. III, 429a10] And 2 with respect to this third book there are four
More informationTHE DECISIVE TREATISE
THE DECISIVE TREATISE Ibn-Rushd Ibn-Rushd (1126-1198), also known as Averroes, the latinized form of Abu al-walid Muhammad Ibn Ahmed Ibn Rushd, came from a long line of important judges in Cordoba. He
More informationExcerpts from Aristotle
Excerpts from Aristotle This online version of Aristotle's Rhetoric (a hypertextual resource compiled by Lee Honeycutt) is based on the translation of noted classical scholar W. Rhys Roberts. Book I -
More informationAquinas on Law Summa Theologiae Questions 90 and 91
Aquinas on Law Summa Theologiae Questions 90 and 91 Question 90. The essence of law 1. Is law something pertaining to reason? 2. The end of law 3. Its cause 4. The promulgation of law Article 1. Whether
More informationWilliam Ockham on Universals
MP_C07.qxd 11/17/06 5:28 PM Page 71 7 William Ockham on Universals Ockham s First Theory: A Universal is a Fictum One can plausibly say that a universal is not a real thing inherent in a subject [habens
More informationNicomachean Ethics. Book VI
Nicomachean Ethics By Aristotle Written 350 B.C.E Translated by W. D. Ross Book VI 1 Since we have previously said that one ought to choose that which is intermediate, not the excess nor the defect, and
More informationSYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents
UNIT 1 SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY Contents 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Research in Philosophy 1.3 Philosophical Method 1.4 Tools of Research 1.5 Choosing a Topic 1.1 INTRODUCTION Everyone who seeks knowledge
More informationThe question is concerning truth and it is inquired first what truth is. Now
Sophia Project Philosophy Archives What is Truth? Thomas Aquinas The question is concerning truth and it is inquired first what truth is. Now it seems that truth is absolutely the same as the thing which
More informationSelf-Evidence in Finnis Natural Law Theory: A Reply to Sayers
Self-Evidence in Finnis Natural Law Theory: A Reply to Sayers IRENE O CONNELL* Introduction In Volume 23 (1998) of the Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy Mark Sayers1 sets out some objections to aspects
More informationCOMPLETE PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL TREATISES of ANSELM of CANTERBURY. Translated by JASPER HOPKINS and HERBERT RICHARDSON
COMPLETE PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL TREATISES of ANSELM of CANTERBURY Translated by JASPER HOPKINS and HERBERT RICHARDSON The Arthur J. Banning Press Minneapolis In the notes to the translations the
More informationExcerpts from. Lectures on the Book of Proverbs. Ralph Wardlaw
Excerpts from Lectures on the Book of Proverbs by Ralph Wardlaw Proverbs 30:1 4 "The words of Agur the son of Jakeh, even his prophecy. This man declared to Ithiel to Ithiel and Ucal: Surely I am more
More informationFrom Aristotle s Ousia to Ibn Sina s Jawhar
In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Beneficent From Aristotle s Ousia to Ibn Sina s Jawhar SHAHRAM PAZOUKI, TEHERAN There is a shift in the meaning of substance from ousia in Aristotle to jawhar in Ibn
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 8 March 1 st, 2016 Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics 1 Ø Today we begin Unit 2 of the course, focused on Normative Ethics = the practical development of standards for right
More informationFaith and Reason Thomas Aquinas
Faith and Reason Thomas Aquinas QUESTION 1. FAITH Article 2. Whether the object of faith is something complex, by way of a proposition? Objection 1. It would seem that the object of faith is not something
More informationPlato's Parmenides and the Dilemma of Participation
1 di 5 27/12/2018, 18:22 Theory and History of Ontology by Raul Corazzon e-mail: rc@ontology.co INTRODUCTION: THE ANCIENT INTERPRETATIONS OF PLATOS' PARMENIDES "Plato's Parmenides was probably written
More informationTHE ESSENTIAL CONNECTION BETWEEN COMMON SENSE PHILOSOPHY AND LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE
Studia Gilsoniana 3:supplement (2014): 605 617 ISSN 2300 0066 Rector, Adler-Aquinas Institute Chair, St. John Paul II Thomistic Studies Graduate Concentration in Christian Wisdom, Holy Apostles College
More informationThe Creation of the World in Time According to Fakhr al-razi
Kom, 2017, vol. VI (2) : 49 75 UDC: 113 Рази Ф. 28-172.2 Рази Ф. doi: 10.5937/kom1702049H Original scientific paper The Creation of the World in Time According to Fakhr al-razi Shiraz Husain Agha Faculty
More informationOn the epistemological status of mathematical objects in Plato s philosophical system
On the epistemological status of mathematical objects in Plato s philosophical system Floris T. van Vugt University College Utrecht University, The Netherlands October 22, 2003 Abstract The main question
More informationComparative Political Philosophy: Islam and the West Political Science (intermediate-level seminar)
Comparative Political Philosophy: Islam and the West Political Science (intermediate-level seminar) It is a little-known story that many of the classical texts of ancient Greece, texts that make up the
More informationEvidence and Transcendence
Evidence and Transcendence Religious Epistemology and the God-World Relationship Anne E. Inman University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Copyright 2008 by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame,
More informationRobert Kiely Office Hours: Tuesday 1-3, Wednesday 1-3, and by appointment
A History of Philosophy: Nature, Certainty, and the Self Fall, 2018 Robert Kiely oldstuff@imsa.edu Office Hours: Tuesday 1-3, Wednesday 1-3, and by appointment Description How do we know what we know?
More informationDR. LEONARD PEIKOFF. Lecture 3 THE METAPHYSICS OF TWO WORLDS: ITS RESULTS IN THIS WORLD
Founders of Western Philosophy: Thales to Hume a 12-lecture course by DR. LEONARD PEIKOFF Edited by LINDA REARDAN, A.M. Lecture 3 THE METAPHYSICS OF TWO WORLDS: ITS RESULTS IN THIS WORLD A Publication
More informationOSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5 May 14th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM Commentary pm Krabbe Dale Jacquette Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive
More informationHonors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions
Cabrillo College Claudia Close Honors Ethics Philosophy 10H Fall 2018 Honors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions Your initial presentation should be approximately 6-7 minutes and you should prepare
More informationThe Names of God. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 12-13) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006)
The Names of God from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 12-13) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006) For with respect to God, it is more apparent to us what God is not, rather
More informationNicomachean Ethics. by Aristotle ( B.C.)
by Aristotle (384 322 B.C.) IT IS NOT UNREASONABLE that men should derive their concept of the good and of happiness from the lives which they lead. The common run of people and the most vulgar identify
More informationWhat one needs to know to prepare for'spinoza's method is to be found in the treatise, On the Improvement
SPINOZA'S METHOD Donald Mangum The primary aim of this paper will be to provide the reader of Spinoza with a certain approach to the Ethics. The approach is designed to prevent what I believe to be certain
More informationLogical Appeal (Logos)
Logical Appeal (Logos) Relies on sound reasoning, facts, statistics Uses evidence well Analyzes cause-effect relationships Uses patterns of inductive and deductive reasoning Pitfall: failure to clearly
More informationThe Five Ways of St. Thomas in proving the existence of
The Language of Analogy in the Five Ways of St. Thomas Aquinas Moses Aaron T. Angeles, Ph.D. San Beda College The Five Ways of St. Thomas in proving the existence of God is, needless to say, a most important
More informationSelections of the Nicomachean Ethics for GGL Unit: Learning to Live Well Taken from classic.mit.edu archive. Translated by W.D. Ross I.
Selections of the Nicomachean Ethics for GGL Unit: Learning to Live Well Taken from classic.mit.edu archive. Translated by W.D. Ross I.7 Let us again return to the good we are seeking, and ask what it
More informationBased on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak.
On Interpretation By Aristotle Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak. First we must define the terms 'noun' and 'verb', then the terms 'denial' and 'affirmation',
More informationThis paper will focus on Ibn Khaldun s ideas about history and historical method according to his famous study The Muqaddimah.
Al-Qasemi Journal of Islamic Studies, volume 2, Issue 2 (2017), On Ibn 37-44 Khaldun s Historical Method On Ibn Khaldun s Historical Method Prof. Dr. Nahide Bozkurt Abstract The concept of history plays
More informationCHRISTIAN MORALITY: A MORALITY OF THE DMNE GOOD SUPREMELY LOVED ACCORDING TO jacques MARITAIN AND john PAUL II
CHRISTIAN MORALITY: A MORALITY OF THE DMNE GOOD SUPREMELY LOVED ACCORDING TO jacques MARITAIN AND john PAUL II Denis A. Scrandis This paper argues that Christian moral philosophy proposes a morality of
More informationThomas Aquinas on the World s Duration. Summa Theologiae Ia Q46: The Beginning of the Duration of Created Things
Thomas Aquinas on the World s Duration Thomas Aquinas (1224/1226 1274) was a prolific philosopher and theologian. His exposition of Aristotle s philosophy and his views concerning matters central to the
More informationALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI
ALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI Michael HUEMER ABSTRACT: I address Moti Mizrahi s objections to my use of the Self-Defeat Argument for Phenomenal Conservatism (PC). Mizrahi contends
More informationAristotle. Aristotle was an ancient Greek Philosopher who made contributions to logic, physics, the
Johnson!1 Jenni Johnson Howard Ritz Intro to Debate 9 March 2017 Aristotle Aristotle was an ancient Greek Philosopher who made contributions to logic, physics, the arts, as well as an incalculable amount
More informationCategories and On Interpretation. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey
Categories and On Interpretation Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey Aristotle Born 384 BC From Stagira, ancient Macedonia Student and lecturer in Plato s Academy Teacher of Alexander the Great Founder
More informationKANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
More informationTHE ORDINATIO OF BLESSED JOHN DUNS SCOTUS. Book Two. First Distinction (page 16)
1 THE ORDINATIO OF BLESSED JOHN DUNS SCOTUS Book Two First Distinction (page 16) Question 1: Whether Primary Causality with Respect to all Causables is of Necessity in the Three Persons Num. 1 I. Opinion
More informationSample. 2.1 Introduction. Outline
Chapter 2: Natural Law Outline 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Some problems of definition 2.3 Classical natural law 2.4 Divine law 2.5 Natural rights 2.6 The revival of natural law 2.7 The advent of legal positivism
More informationFrom Critique of Pure Reason Preface to the second edition
From Critique of Pure Reason Preface to the second edition Immanuel Kant translated by J. M. D. Meiklejohn Whether the treatment of that portion of our knowledge which lies within the province of pure
More informationAyer s linguistic theory of the a priori
Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2
More informationA-LEVEL Religious Studies
A-LEVEL Religious Studies RST3B Paper 3B Philosophy of Religion Mark Scheme 2060 June 2017 Version: 1.0 Final Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
More informationMEDITATIONS ON THE FIRST PHILOSOPHY: THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
MEDITATIONS ON THE FIRST PHILOSOPHY: THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT René Descartes Introduction, Donald M. Borchert DESCARTES WAS BORN IN FRANCE in 1596 and died in Sweden in 1650. His formal education from
More informationTradition as the 'Platonic Form' of Christian Faith and Practice in Orthodoxy
Tradition as the 'Platonic Form' of Christian Faith and Practice in Orthodoxy by Kenny Pearce Preface I, the author of this essay, am not a member of the Eastern Orthodox Church. As such, I do not necessarily
More informationDevelopment of Thought. The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek philosophia, which
Development of Thought The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek philosophia, which literally means "love of wisdom". The pre-socratics were 6 th and 5 th century BCE Greek thinkers who introduced
More informationW H A T I T M E A N S T O B E R E A L : T H E A N C I E N T S, T H E B I B L E, A N D U S
301 APPENDIX D W H A T I T M E A N S T O B E R E A L : T H E A N C I E N T S, T H E B I B L E, A N D U S We moderns have a very different concept of real from the one that has prevailed throughout most
More informationAKC Lecture 1 Plato, Penrose, Popper
AKC Lecture 1 Plato, Penrose, Popper E. Brian Davies King s College London November 2011 E.B. Davies (KCL) AKC 1 November 2011 1 / 26 Introduction The problem with philosophical and religious questions
More informationIBN RUSHD (AVERROES) ( ) ON THE HARMONY OF RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY. A Translation of his. Decisive Treatise. George HOURANI.
IBN RUSHD (AVERROES) (1126-98) ON THE HARMONY OF RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY A Translation of his Decisive Treatise Determining the Nature of the Connection between Religion and Philosophy By George HOURANI
More informationRemarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays
Bernays Project: Text No. 26 Remarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays (Bemerkungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik) Translation by: Dirk Schlimm Comments: With corrections by Charles
More informationIn Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg
1 In Search of the Ontological Argument Richard Oxenberg Abstract We can attend to the logic of Anselm's ontological argument, and amuse ourselves for a few hours unraveling its convoluted word-play, or
More informationREVIEW. St. Thomas Aquinas. By RALPH MCINERNY. The University of Notre Dame Press 1982 (reprint of Twayne Publishers 1977). Pp $5.95.
REVIEW St. Thomas Aquinas. By RALPH MCINERNY. The University of Notre Dame Press 1982 (reprint of Twayne Publishers 1977). Pp. 172. $5.95. McInerny has succeeded at a demanding task: he has written a compact
More informationReason in Islamic Law
Macalester Islam Journal Volume 1 Spring 2006 Issue 1 Article 9 April 2006 Reason in Islamic Law Emma Gallegos Macalester College Gallegos, Emma (2006) "Reason in Islamic Law," Macalester Islam Journal:
More information