Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 6a Reasoning
|
|
- Anissa Byrd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 6a Reasoning
2 Introduction Philosophers attach enormous significance to our capacity to reason, and for this reason the study of reasoning itself is the most fundamental of all philosophical endeavors. This chapter lays out some of the fundamental aspects of the study of reasoning, and some of the perennial philosophical problems about the nature of reasoning. However, we will be focusing only on the problem of induction.
3 Circular reasoning Do you recall the problem of the Cartesian Circle? It involved Descartes claim that we can trust our clear and distinct ideas of the world. Descartes argued that we could trust our clear and distinct ideas because God gave them to us, and that since God is not a deceiver, he would not have given us clear and distinct ideas if they could not be trusted. The problem was that Descartes actually needed to use and trust the criterion of clarity and distinctness to prove God s existence in the first place.
4 The problem of induction There is another famous reasoning circle involved in the attempt to prove that we can trust our reasoning about nature. It s called the problem of induction. The problem is that all of our beliefs about the way the world is are based on things we have experienced in the past. For example, if you think that eating will satisfy your hunger, this is just because in the past eating has satisfied your hunger. if you think the ball will fall and bounce when you drop it, this is just because the ball has always done this in the past.
5 The uniformity of nature The question is: how do we know that the past is a reliable guide to the future? (p.212) Suppose we tried to establish this by some kind of argument. For example we might say that we know that the past is a reliable guide to the future because in the past, the past has been a pretty reliable guide to the future. You can see the problem. When we argue this way, we are just assuming that our past experiences with respect to using the past as a guide to the future are a reliable guide to our future experiences with using the past as a guide to the future. Just like the Cartesian Circle, we find that we have assumed the very point at issue.
6 The problem of induction is best captured by the question: A. How do we know the future is real? B. How do we know that past is a reliable guide to the future? C. How do we know the future is a reliable indicator of the past? D. How is God s existence provable on the basis of inductive evidence?
7 The problem of induction is similar to the problem of the Cartesian Circle because A. Both involve circular reasoning. B. Both use the criterion of clarity and distinctness. C. Both are committed in Descartes Meditations. D. Both are fundamentally analogical arguments.
8 The laws of the universe. This problem is much deeper than it may at first appear, and it has serious practical consequences as well. One way to show this is to begin with the fact that whenever we observe patterns in nature, we tend to assume that they must have some discernible cause. This is basically just a way of stating Leibniz s principle of sufficient reason. The problem with this view, however, is that patterns can in fact be produced by random processes. The failure to appreciate this fact is at the heart of a lot of confusion about how the world works, and it is known as The Gambler s Fallacy.
9 The Gambler s Fallacy The Gambler s Fallacy basically involves believing that there is such a thing as being hot or cold when you are playing a game of chance, like roulette, craps, or a slot machine. For example, people who have been having a good night at the table have a hard time quitting because they think they are hot. Specifically, they think that the fact that they have had a series of winning bets means that they will continue to have winning bets. Of course, this belief is what makes casino owners very wealthy people. People who run casinos know that there is no such thing as being hot or cold. When you are dealing with random games, the past results, not only does not guarantee, but actually has nothing whatsoever to do with the future.
10 The Gambler s Fallacy 2 Another manifestation of the gambler s fallacy is the belief that as a certain kind of result accumulates, the pressure builds up for it to change. This is what people sometimes call The Law of Averages. (In fact there is no such thing.) So, for example, people who have been cold at the tables will often convince themselves that this recent history means the odds have to shift back in their favor at some point. Or, people who have been pulling a slot machine all night and getting no payout often feel that it would be foolish to quit, since the odds are now so much in favor of a jackpot. This is the same kind of mistake: basically games of chance have no memory whatsoever.
11 Randomly produced patterns Many people have a hard time believing all this, and if they believe it they still have a hard time processing it s implications. For example, suppose you were to start flipping a perfectly ordinary nickel and recording whether it comes up heads or tails each time. Ask yourself this, which of the following patterns is more likely to come up? HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHT HTTHHTTTHTHTTTTHHTTHTHHHHTTTHHTH The answer is that they are all equally likely. In fact, every single pattern is just a likely as any other.
12 Basics of probability It s pretty easy to understand why this is. Consider just one toss of a coin. As you know, there is a 50% chance of getting heads and a 50% chance of getting tails. This is simply because there are only two possibilities and they are both equally likely. Now consider two tosses in a row. There are four different results that can occur here. HH TT HT TH All of these are equally likely too. In particular, HH is no more or less likely than HT. There is a 25% chance of either one. Now consider three tosses. There are now eight possible results. HHH HHT HTT HTH TTT TTH THH THT These, too, are all equally likely. There is a.125% chance of every sequence. We can do this forever. The result is that 100 heads in a row, or a perfectly alternating sequence of heads and tails has exactly the same probability as any other one that actually appears to be perfectly random.
13 If I flip a fair coin five times in a row and each time it comes up heads, then the next time I flip the coin is more likely to be tails than heads. A. True B. False
14 What does randomness look like? Lots of people think that random processes can t produce patterns, but this is simply untrue. A funny example of this is the ipod Shuffle. When Apple first made the Shuffle the songs were actually generated randomly. Of course, this means that sometimes the same song might be played two or more times in a row. When people noticed this happenig, they assumed the Shuffle was not random and that Apple was trying to promote certain songs. So Apple actually had to change it to a non random program, just to satisfy most people s uninformed views about what randomness really is.
15 Applications to physics An Austrian philosopher and physicist named Ludwig Boltzmann applied these basic insights to physical systems. Essentially he pointed out that if we think of a container filled with a gas, we will tend to assume that the gas, which is just a collection of molecules, will tend to be spread out more or less evenly within the box. If we then ask ourselves which of the following is more likely: (1) a configuration of molecules that corresponds to our expectation that the molecules will be spread out more or less evenly, or (2) a configuration in which every molecule in the box is in one half of the box, we will naturally say that the spread out configuration is more likely. In fact, however we will be wrong. Just as with coin tossing, all configurations of molecules are equally likely.
16 Applications to physics 2 But we are not as confused as it seems. The truth is that it is still far more likely that the molecules will be spread out evenly throughout the box. But this is not because one distribution is more likely than another. It is just because there are more- orders of magnitude more- ways to spread the molecules throughout the box, than for them to be bunched up in one half of the box. The point is that nothing physically prevents this. The reason we never encounter it is strictly a statistical phenomenon, not a matter of physical impossibility. This is what is going on with coin-tossing as well. Our sense that a random-looking distribution is more likely than a perfect run of heads or tails has a basis in statistics. The fact is that there are many, many more ways to make sequences that look random to us, than sequences that look ordered. But again, there is nothing more physically likely about any given sequence.
17 Which of the following statements about coin tosses is true? A. 10 heads in a row is just as likely as 5 heads followed by 5 tails. B. 10 heads in a row is just as likely as a combination of 5 heads and 5 tails. C. 10 heads in a row is just as likely as 5 heads in a row.
18 Which of the 10 BB s in a box is more likely to have been produced by a random process? A. 1 B. 2 C. They are both equally likely. 1 2
19 What all this means What all this means is that there is no way to prove that a particular pattern we observe is not simply a statistical phenomenon, one that gives no reason whatsoever to suppose that the observed pattern must, or is even likely to continue in this way. If you really grasp what is being said here this should be quite disturbing. It means that all of the order that we now call the universe could, in fact, be the result of purely random processes.
20 What all this means 2 If, for example, you think of tossing a coin an infinite number of times, you will realize that you can imagine absolutely any sequence you like, and at some point in the series you will be able to find it. In fact, if it is truly an infinite series, you will be able to find that sequence, along with every other sequence, an infinite number of times. Similarly, if you imagine the universe as simply a collection of molecules banging around in a box forever, every single sequence of collisions, including the one that corresponds to the highly ordered universe we now observe, will be found. And yet it will all be perfectly random.
21 The lottery for the golden harp So now the point of Blackburn s story about the lottery for the golden harp should be clear. The lottery for the golden harp is really not much different than the California State Lottery. The odds of winning the lotto are a little worse (1 in 16 million) than the odds of winning the golden harp (1 in 10 million). But both are incredibly low. Also, in Blackburn s lottery, one of the spirits is guaranteed to have the winning number, which is not the case with the lotto. Applying golden harp reasoning to the lotto, Blackburn asks you to imagine that you and your friend Philo both have lotto tickets, and are sitting next to the radio on Saturday night as they call out the winning number. Your numbers differ only in the last digit as follows. Philo: Cleanthes: The winning number is called out, to the growing amazement of both of you: and then the radio dies.
22 The lottery for the golden harp 2 To this point, both of you are equally in the running to become multi-millionaires. You both have already defied the odds by getting the first 5 numbers right ( 1 in 450,000). The question is who is most likely to have one the whole thing? Of course, because we understand the randomness of the lotto, most of us will at least say that there is no guarantee that either of us has won. But even though we know the numbers are generated by a random process, Blackburn s point is that most of us will still tend to think Philo is the likely winner. The pattern is just so obvious. The problem, of course, is that there is no pattern. At this point you both have exactly the same chance (1/45) of being the winner.
23 Responding to Hume How do we respond to Hume s point that there is no way to prove that nature is uniform? Some people have responded that this shows that the uniformity of nature is an article of faith, and that in the end science requires faith just as much as religion does. This point can not be simply dismissed, but it is a bit of an overstatement. Many people disagree on whether one should have faith in, say, the miracle of Christ s resurrection. But no sane person really thinks it makes sense to conduct our daily business without considering our past experience.
24 Descartes Redux The more traditional response to Hume is actually to reject the requirement of proof. Try to recall how Hume criticized Descartes attempt to prove the existence of the external world. He said that if you doubt everything, then you have taken away the very tools by which you would prove the existence of the external world.
25 The practicality of rationality This is the proper response to Hume as well, and in fact it is really Hume s fundamental point. There is no non circular way to prove that the past is a reliable guide to the future. But we do not actually need to prove it in order for it to be a reasonable assumption. Just as we can not practically doubt our own existence or the existence of an external world, we also can not practically doubt the uniformity of nature.
Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 6b Reasoning
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 6b Reasoning According to Kant, a sentence like: Sisters are female is A. a synthetic truth B. an analytic truth C. an ethical truth D. a metaphysical truth If you reach
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 1b Knowledge
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 1b Knowledge According to A.C. Grayling, if cogito ergo sum is an argument, it is missing a premise. This premise is: A. Everything that exists thinks. B. Everything that
More informationDo we have knowledge of the external world?
Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 5d God
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 5d God No clickers today. 2 quizzes Wednesday. Don t be late or you will miss the first one! Turn in your Nammour summaries today. No credit for late ones. According to
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7b The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7b The World Kant s metaphysics rested on identifying a kind of truth that Hume and other did not acknowledge. It is called A. synthetic a priori B. analytic a priori C.
More informationThere are various different versions of Newcomb s problem; but an intuitive presentation of the problem is very easy to give.
Newcomb s problem Today we begin our discussion of paradoxes of rationality. Often, we are interested in figuring out what it is rational to do, or to believe, in a certain sort of situation. Philosophers
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationWell, how are we supposed to know that Jesus performed miracles on earth? Pretty clearly, the answer is: on the basis of testimony.
Miracles Last time we were discussing the Incarnation, and in particular the question of how one might acquire sufficient evidence for it to be rational to believe that a human being, Jesus of Nazareth,
More informationThe St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox
The St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox Consider the following bet: The St. Petersburg I am going to flip a fair coin until it comes up heads. If the first time it comes up heads is on the
More informationThe Rationality of Religious Beliefs
The Rationality of Religious Beliefs Bryan Frances Think, 14 (2015), 109-117 Abstract: Many highly educated people think religious belief is irrational and unscientific. If you ask a philosopher, however,
More informationWelcome back to our third and final lecture on skepticism and the appearance
PHI 110 Lecture 15 1 Welcome back to our third and final lecture on skepticism and the appearance reality gap. Because the material that we re working with now is quite difficult and involved, I will do
More informationEpistemology. Theory of Knowledge
Epistemology Theory of Knowledge Epistemological Questions What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know x? What
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationDoes God exist? The argument from miracles
Does God exist? The argument from miracles We ve now discussed three of the central arguments for the existence of God. Beginning today, we will examine the case against belief in God. Next time, we ll
More informationHume s Critique of Miracles
Hume s Critique of Miracles Michael Gleghorn examines Hume s influential critique of miracles and points out the major shortfalls in his argument. Hume s first premise assumes that there could not be miracles
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7c The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7c The World Idealism Despite the power of Berkeley s critique, his resulting metaphysical view is highly problematic. Essentially, Berkeley concludes that there is no
More informationMITOCW watch?v=ogo1gpxsuzu
MITOCW watch?v=ogo1gpxsuzu The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to offer high quality educational resources for free. To
More information175 Chapter CHAPTER 23: Probability
75 Chapter 23 75 CHAPTER 23: Probability According to the doctrine of chance, you ought to put yourself to the trouble of searching for the truth; for if you die without worshipping the True Cause, you
More information1/9. Leibniz on Descartes Principles
1/9 Leibniz on Descartes Principles In 1692, or nearly fifty years after the first publication of Descartes Principles of Philosophy, Leibniz wrote his reflections on them indicating the points in which
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 14: 2-22 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding b. Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between
More informationProbability Foundations for Electrical Engineers Prof. Krishna Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Probability Foundations for Electrical Engineers Prof. Krishna Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture - 1 Introduction Welcome, this is Probability
More informationFr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God
Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God Father Frederick C. Copleston (Jesuit Catholic priest) versus Bertrand Russell (agnostic philosopher) Copleston:
More information2017 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions
National Qualifications 07 07 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 07 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only
More informationCan A Priori Justified Belief Be Extended Through Deduction? It is often assumed that if one deduces some proposition p from some premises
Can A Priori Justified Belief Be Extended Through Deduction? Introduction It is often assumed that if one deduces some proposition p from some premises which one knows a priori, in a series of individually
More informationModule - 02 Lecturer - 09 Inferential Statistics - Motivation
Introduction to Data Analytics Prof. Nandan Sudarsanam and Prof. B. Ravindran Department of Management Studies and Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
More information1/8. Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God
1/8 Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God Descartes opens the Third Meditation by reminding himself that nothing that is purely sensory is reliable. The one thing that is certain is the cogito. He
More informationSummer Preparation Work
2017 Summer Preparation Work Philosophy of Religion Theme 1 Arguments for the existence of God Instructions: Philosophy of Religion - Arguments for the existence of God The Cosmological Argument 1. Watch
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010 Class 3 - Meditations Two and Three too much material, but we ll do what we can Marcus, Modern Philosophy,
More informationReid Against Skepticism
Thus we see, that Descartes and Locke take the road that leads to skepticism without knowing the end of it, but they stop short for want of light to carry them farther. Berkeley, frightened at the appearance
More informationGetting To God. The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism. truehorizon.org
Getting To God The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism truehorizon.org A True Worldview A worldview is like a set of glasses through which you see everything in life. It is the lens that brings
More informationThe Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument The Cosmological Argument is an argument that attempts to demonstrate the existence of God using only one starting assumption: Something exists. 1. Three sorts of being: Whatever
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationCHAPTER 17: UNCERTAINTY AND RANDOM: WHEN IS CONCLUSION JUSTIFIED?
CHAPTER 17: UNCERTAINTY AND RANDOM: WHEN IS CONCLUSION JUSTIFIED? INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS Deduction the use of facts to reach a conclusion seems straightforward and beyond reproach. The reality
More information24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy. Hume on Causation. I. Recap of Hume on impressions/ideas
I. Recap of Hume on impressions/ideas Hume on Causation Perhaps the best way to understand Hume (1711-1776) is to place him in his historical context. Isaac Newton (1643-1727) had just been laying out
More informationEnding The Scandal. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
366 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Semicompatibilism Narrow Incompatibilism
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 2b Mind
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 2b Mind According to Blackburn, the argument from analogy to the existence of other minds: A. is only available to the Cartesian dualist. B. is not available to the Cartesian
More informationSeptember 11, 1998 N.G.I.S.C. New Orleans Meeting. Within the next 15 minutes I will. make a comprehensive summary of dozens and dozens of research
September, N.G.I.S.C. New Orleans Meeting CHAIRMAN JAMES: Mr. Ladouceur. MR. LADOUCEUR: Within the next minutes I will make a comprehensive summary of dozens and dozens of research that we've conducted
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism
Michael Huemer on Skepticism Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology Topic 3 - Skepticism Chapter II. The Lure of Radical Skepticism 1. Mike Huemer defines radical skepticism as follows: Philosophical skeptics
More informationConditionals II: no truth conditions?
Conditionals II: no truth conditions? UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016 John MacFarlane 1 Arguments for the material conditional analysis As Edgington [1] notes, there are some powerful reasons
More informationLecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).
TOPIC: You need to be able to: Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims). Organize arguments that we read into a proper argument
More informationSaul Kripke, Naming and Necessity
24.09x Minds and Machines Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity Excerpt from Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity (Harvard, 1980). Identity theorists have been concerned with several distinct types of identifications:
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 4b Free Will/Self
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 4b Free Will/Self The unobservability of the self David Hume, the Scottish empiricist we met in connection with his critique of Descartes method of doubt, is very skeptical
More informationLogical (formal) fallacies
Fallacies in academic writing Chad Nilep There are many possible sources of fallacy an idea that is mistakenly thought to be true, even though it may be untrue in academic writing. The phrase logical fallacy
More informationDescartes to Early Psychology. Phil 255
Descartes to Early Psychology Phil 255 Descartes World View Rationalism: the view that a priori considerations could lay the foundations for human knowledge. (i.e. Think hard enough and you will be lead
More informationA Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo
A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo "Education is nothing more nor less than learning to think." Peter Facione In this article I review the historical evolution of principles and
More informationCursed? On the Gambler s Fallacy, Confirmation Bias, and the Case of Mini War Gaming s Quirk
MUSINGS OF A PHILOGAMER 007 Cursed? On the Gambler s Fallacy, Confirmation Bias, and the Case of Mini War Gaming s Quirk Matthew Gray Army Gaming 05 August 2017 1. Introduction Consider, for a moment,
More informationBetting With Sleeping Beauty
Betting With Sleeping Beauty Waking up to the probabilistic fairy tales we tell ourselves T he Sleeping Beauty problem is a paradox in probability theory, originally proposed by philosopher Arnold Zuboff.
More informationPhilosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI
Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Precising definition Theoretical definition Persuasive definition Syntactic definition Operational definition 1. Are questions about defining a phrase
More informationW H A T I T M E A N S T O B E R E A L : T H E A N C I E N T S, T H E B I B L E, A N D U S
301 APPENDIX D W H A T I T M E A N S T O B E R E A L : T H E A N C I E N T S, T H E B I B L E, A N D U S We moderns have a very different concept of real from the one that has prevailed throughout most
More informationPsychoddities. Can Golden Balls save the world?
1 Can Golden Balls save the world? Golden Balls is a game show on British TV (shown on ITV, an independent channel; the BBC would probably consider it a little tasteless). American and Australian readers
More information6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3
6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3 The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare
More information-1 Peter 3:15-16 (NSRV)
Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision 3. Why does anything at all exist? 4. Why did the universe begin? 5. Why is the universe fine-tuned for life? Sunday, February 24, 2013, 10 to 10:50 am, in
More informationIntroduction to Statistical Hypothesis Testing Prof. Arun K Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Introduction to Statistical Hypothesis Testing Prof. Arun K Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture 09 Basics of Hypothesis Testing Hello friends, welcome
More informationA level Religious Studies at Titus Salt
Component 2 Philosophy of Religion Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive This theme considers how the philosophy of religion has, over time, influenced and been influenced by developments
More informationHume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Hume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017 / Philosophy 1 After Descartes The greatest success of the philosophy of Descartes was that it helped pave the way for the mathematical
More informationTrue and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs
True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs Dr. Richard Spencer June, 2015 Our Purpose Theistic proofs and other evidence help to solidify our faith by confirming that Christianity is both true and reasonable.
More informationThe end of the world & living in a computer simulation
The end of the world & living in a computer simulation In the reading for today, Leslie introduces a familiar sort of reasoning: The basic idea here is one which we employ all the time in our ordinary
More informationDetachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood
Detachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood GILBERT HARMAN PRINCETON UNIVERSITY When can we detach probability qualifications from our inductive conclusions? The following rule may seem plausible:
More informationFrom the fact that I cannot think of God except as existing, it follows that existence is inseparable from God, and hence that he really exists.
FIFTH MEDITATION The essence of material things, and the existence of God considered a second time We have seen that Descartes carefully distinguishes questions about a thing s existence from questions
More informationNozick s fourth condition
Nozick s fourth condition Introduction Nozick s tracking account of knowledge includes four individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions. S knows p iff (i) p is true; (ii) S believes p; (iii)
More informationTake Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert
PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #1 Instructions Answer as many questions as you are able to. Please write your answers clearly in the blanks provided.
More informationEgocentric Rationality
3 Egocentric Rationality 1. The Subject Matter of Egocentric Epistemology Egocentric epistemology is concerned with the perspectives of individual believers and the goal of having an accurate and comprehensive
More informationWhat should I believe? Only what I have evidence for.
What should I believe? Only what I have evidence for. We closed last time by considering an objection to Moore s proof of an external world. The objection was that Moore does not know the premises of his
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College. Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics Scepticism, and the Mind 2 Last Time we looked at scepticism about INDUCTION. This Lecture will move on to SCEPTICISM
More informationTHE PROBLEM WITH WEALTH
5 THE PROBLEM WITH WEALTH What s the best advice you ve heard about money? QUESTION #1 BIBLE STUDIES FOR LIFE 45 THE POINT Contentment comes from Christ, not our wealth. THE BIBLE MEETS LIFE In 1997, Billie
More informationTHE PROBLEM WITH WEALTH
5 THE PROBLEM WITH WEALTH What s the best advice you ve heard about money? QUESTION #1 BIBLE STUDIES FOR LIFE 45 THE POINT Contentment comes from Christ, not our wealth. THE BIBLE MEETS LIFE In 1997, Billie
More informationThe Paranormal, Miracles and David Hume
The Paranormal, Miracles and David Hume Terence Penelhum Publication Date: 01/01/2003 Is parapsychology a pseudo-science? Many believe that the Eighteenth century philosopher David Hume showed, in effect,
More informationThree Kinds of Arguments
Chapter 27 Three Kinds of Arguments Arguments in general We ve been focusing on Moleculan-analyzable arguments for several chapters, but now we want to take a step back and look at the big picture, at
More informationPulling Rabbits from Hats (Conditional Probability), Part I
Pulling Rabbits from Hats (Conditional Probability), Part I For the next couple weeks, we ll be working on counting and probability and working up to some pretty fancy stuff, including conditional probability.
More informationReview Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
More informationA Puzzle About Ineffable Propositions
A Puzzle About Ineffable Propositions Agustín Rayo February 22, 2010 I will argue for localism about credal assignments: the view that credal assignments are only well-defined relative to suitably constrained
More informationThe British Empiricism
The British Empiricism Locke, Berkeley and Hume copyleft: nicolazuin.2018 nowxhere.wordpress.com The terrible heritage of Descartes: Skepticism, Empiricism, Rationalism The problem originates from the
More informationCommon Sense: A Contemporary Defense By Noah Lemos Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xvi
Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense By Noah Lemos Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. pp. xvi + 192. Lemos offers no arguments in this book for the claim that common sense beliefs are known.
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2014 Slide 1 Business P
More informationOf Skepticism with Regard to the Senses. David Hume
Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses David Hume General Points about Hume's Project The rationalist method used by Descartes cannot provide justification for any substantial, interesting claims about
More information! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.
! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! What is the relation between that knowledge and that given in the sciences?! Key figure: René
More informationClass #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The Story of the Sun
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Fall 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The
More informationwhat makes reasons sufficient?
Mark Schroeder University of Southern California August 2, 2010 what makes reasons sufficient? This paper addresses the question: what makes reasons sufficient? and offers the answer, being at least as
More informationTHE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM
SKÉPSIS, ISSN 1981-4194, ANO VII, Nº 14, 2016, p. 33-39. THE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM ALEXANDRE N. MACHADO Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) Email:
More informationAsking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley
Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley A Decision Making and Support Systems Perspective by Richard Day M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley look to change
More informationQuotable. JESUS: THE INDESCRIBABLE GIFT Jesus: The Gift of God s Hope Twelve Daily Studies for Christmas
Quotable For centuries, righteous Jews have put their hope in the coming of the Messiah. They ve lived on tiptoe, looking toward the horizon for the Promised One to arise like the dawn of a new day to
More informationBradley on Chance, Admissibility & the Mind of God
Bradley on Chance, Admissibility & the Mind of God Alastair Wilson University of Birmingham & Monash University a.j.wilson@bham.ac.uk 15 th October 2013 Abstract: Darren Bradley s recent reply (Bradley
More informationThe following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support
MITOCW Lecture 14 The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to offer high quality educational resources for free. To make a
More informationQuaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Quaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion Volume 1 Issue 1 Volume 1, Issue 1 (Spring 2015) Article 4 April 2015 Infinity and Beyond James M. Derflinger II Liberty University,
More informationThe Resurrection Substitute Mark 16:1-8, Romans 6:4-6
The Resurrection Substitute Mark 16:1-8, Romans 6:4-6 Friends, would you agree with me that many people in our society today are looking for a new life or a better life or just the chance to perhaps improve
More informationUnless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the New King James Version of the Bible.
First printing: July 2012 Copyright 2012 by Answers in Genesis USA. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission of the publisher,
More informationRule-Following and the Ontology of the Mind Abstract The problem of rule-following
Rule-Following and the Ontology of the Mind Michael Esfeld (published in Uwe Meixner and Peter Simons (eds.): Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age. Papers of the 22nd International Wittgenstein Symposium.
More informationThe Development of Knowledge and Claims of Truth in the Autobiography In Code. When preparing her project to enter the Esat Young Scientist
Katie Morrison 3/18/11 TEAC 949 The Development of Knowledge and Claims of Truth in the Autobiography In Code Sarah Flannery had the rare experience in this era of producing new mathematical research at
More informationHume. Hume the Empiricist. Judgments about the World. Impressions as Content of the Mind. The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World
Hume Hume the Empiricist The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World As an empiricist, Hume thinks that all knowledge of the world comes from sense experience If all we can know comes from
More informationTo See Jesus Rev. Jason Freyer
Rev. Jason Freyer 2018 by Rev. Jason Freyer and Westminster Presbyterian Church. All rights reserved. No part of this sermon may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including
More informationPinker versus Taleb: A Non-deadly Quarrel over the Decline of Violence
Pinker versus Taleb: A Non-deadly Quarrel over the Decline of Violence Professor Michael Spagat Department of Economics, RHUL m.spagat@rhul.ac.uk Talk given at the conference: The Nature of Deadly Quarrels:
More informationCartesian Dualism. I am not my body
Cartesian Dualism I am not my body Dualism = two-ism Concerning human beings, a (substance) dualist says that the mind and body are two different substances (things). The brain is made of matter, and part
More informationChristian Apologetics The Classical Arguments
I. Introduction to the Classical Arguments A. Classical Apologetics Christian Apologetics The Classical Arguments Lecture II September 24, 2015 1. An approach to apologetics based upon attempted deductive
More informationThe Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
More informationA Multitude of Selves: Contrasting the Cartesian and Nietzschean views of selfhood
A Multitude of Selves: Contrasting the Cartesian and Nietzschean views of selfhood One s identity as a being distinct and independent from others is vital in order to interact with the world. A self identity
More informationFourth Meditation: Truth and falsity
Fourth Meditation: Truth and falsity In these past few days I have become used to keeping my mind away from the senses; and I have become strongly aware that very little is truly known about bodies, whereas
More informationEXAMINERS REPORT AM PHILOSOPHY
EXAMINERS REPORT AM PHILOSOPHY FIRST SESSION 2018 Part 1: Statistical Information Table 1 shows the distribution of the candidates grades for the May 2018 Advanced Level Philosophy Examination. Table1:
More information10. Evaluation Evaluating individual reasons and objections
10. Evaluation The ability to evaluate arguments is probably the most important part of critical thinking. We have already looked at various aspects of the evaluation of arguments. But it will be useful
More informationMohammad Reza Vaez Shahrestani. University of Bonn
Philosophy Study, November 2017, Vol. 7, No. 11, 595-600 doi: 10.17265/2159-5313/2017.11.002 D DAVID PUBLISHING Defending Davidson s Anti-skepticism Argument: A Reply to Otavio Bueno Mohammad Reza Vaez
More informationWelcome back to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Together.
Welcome back to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Together. Last week we started considering some rational theistic proofs for the existence of God with particular reference to those intellectual barriers
More information