Pain, Suffering, and a Benevolent God. Topic: The Problem of Good and Evil
|
|
- Molly Wheeler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Pain, Suffering, and a Benevolent God Topic: The Problem of Good and Evil 1
2 The philosophical argument for the Problem of Evil, is an argument attempting to prove that an omnipotent, good, loving God as depicted by Judeo-Christian-Muslim, JCM, values cannot exist. This is one of the strongest arguments against the existence of a JCM God. In this paper, I will argue that you cannot use the existence of suffering, pain, and tragedy in the world to determine God does not exist, because suffering and pain can have greater purposes that are both observable to humans and, if you have reason to believe God exists, greater than humanity is capable of comprehending. The argument for the Problem of Evil contains 3 premises implying its conclusion. Premise one states that God, in the sense that JCM religions view him, is, perfectly omnipotent, and benevolent always (Lecture 6:1-25, 2018). In other words, God has infinite wisdom and foresees all of humanity s choices both good and evil. Since God is perfectly benevolent, he chooses to be loving towards his creation in all his acts and would not cause harm. The next premise professes that historically the world has experienced and continues to experience significant amounts of suffering and pain (Lecture 6:1-25, 2018). For example, on 9/11/2001 suffering and pain was caused to the victims of and victims families by a 19 man terrorist attack, claiming the lives of 2,977 people, injuring even more, and causing a significant economic loss ("September 11th Terror Attacks Fast Facts", 2017). Another example, of loss and pain would be the natural disaster of Hurricane Katrina, which was not caused by man, but claimed the lives of over 3,500 people, causing pain for their families, and destroying the homes, businesses, and property of thousands ("Hurricane Katrina Statistics Fast Facts", 2017). Our world has significant suffering and pain. 2
3 The last premise asserts that the history and current existence of suffering and pain in the world is incompatible with the depiction of God pronounced by JCM theists (Lecture 6:1-25, 2018). Hume stated it this way neither man nor any other animal is happy; therefore God does not will their happiness ("Hume Dialogues Part 10"). If God is both perfectly benevolent and omnipotent, then God would have the foresight to prevent both pain and suffering, and his perfect benevolence would cause him to choose to prevent it. Clearly, this contradicts the description of the JCM God. Epicurus s old questions have still not been answered. Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent. üis he both able and willing? then where does evil come from? ("Hume Dialogues Part 10"). By the definition of the JCM God, God is the most powerful so he must be the source of both good and evil. Thus, since evil does exist if God exists, he must be malevolent, impotent, or both malevolent and impotent; he is indifferent and/or unable to prevent both humanity s and natures cruelty that causes pain and suffering in this world. From this contradiction, the argument derives that the compassionate, all-powerful JCM God cannot exist (Lecture 6:1-25, 2018). God cannot exist, because of the evil in this world. As compelling and resonating as this argument is, it is unsurprising that there is an abundance of skeptical objections raised by JCM theists, eager to defend the existence of a single, loving, powerful creator. Among these objections, the first of the two objections, which I consider the best, that I will discuss centers on humanity s free-will to choose between good and 3
4 evil. This skeptical objection, theodicy, touts that God made us with free will; the choice to choose between causing pain and suffering to both ourselves and others, or performing loving good acts (Lecture 6:1-25, 2018). Defenders who attest this argument claim our free will is the greatest good, and without it humans would not really be people (Lecture 6:1-25, 2018). Clearly, this argument is an attack on premise 3, because if God gives us the freedom to choose to perform evil, then he does not cause it, nor will he prevent it; humanity has the freedom to choose. Thus, under this consideration a benevolent, omnipotent God anticipates the worlds evil choices, but exercises his loving nature by allowing us to make choices independently anyways, despite the resulting destruction and despair. Defenders of the argument have a couple responses to this objection. Traditionally the response to this argument, is to point out that free-will can only account for part of the pain and suffering that exists (Lecture 6:1-25, 2018). Humanity cannot cause disasters such as plagues or Hurricane Katrina, yet they occur and are devastating tragedies. Mackie has a different response to this objection If there is no logical impossibility in a manʹs freely choosing the good on one, or on several occasions, there cannot be a logical impossibility in his freely choosing the good on every occasion (Mackie). To paraphrase, Mackie questions why if God made us with the ability to choose good, he would give us the ability to choose bad; if he was truly benevolent he would not give us the ability to choose to do evil. God choose not to make a world of only good people. The second skeptical objection I would like to address also challenges the third premise, but with a different consideration. This theodicy alleges that God has a parent-child relationship. Comparable to a parent allowing a child to fail a test, or having a child get an immunization shot 4
5 God allows pain and suffering to occur (Lecture 7:1-30, 2018). The child will not get sick because the immunization is preventing them from catching an illness and will learn from the consequences of failing the test, but may not understand why the parent forced the immunization or allowed them to fail. Supporters of the parent-child theodicy do not suggest a specific justification for suffering, only that God has a reason which cannot understand, like a child may not understand their parent. As I stated before this theodicy challenges the third premise, by claiming that God exercising his loving nature, and foresight allows the pain and suffering to occur for a purpose which we cannot interpret or comprehend. Supporters of the Problem of Evil have some notable counter-arguments to this reply. This reply assumes that God exists (Lecture 7:1-30, 2018). In other words, if you have a reason to believe God exists then this argument is valid, however without cause for belief this argument is invalid. Thus, this reply holds a strong counter argument against the Problem of Evil, because if you have a reason to believe God exists, this argument can explain the existence of evil. Contrastingly, though if you do not have a reason to believe in God it holds no weight. As Hume stated, it is now theists turn to tug the labouring oar, and to defend your philosophical subtleties against the dictates of plain reason and experience ("Hume Dialogues Part 10"). The argument for the Problem of Evil does not hold; the skeptic has a considerably stronger argument. The existence of evil, suffering, and pain in the world is not conflicting with the ideology presented by theists supporting a JCM God who is benevolent and omnipotent. Considering the theodicy of the parent-child analogy, an explanation can be given for the existence of God and evil. Thus, if you believe in God you are able to provide reasoning to 5
6 yourself for the pain and suffering you experience, even if it is only that God has reasons and I cannot foresee or understand them. Due to this thorn in the argument s premises, it can only provide a reasonably strong argument as to why you shouldn t believe in God, but cannot dispel the possibility. It is unable to completely dispel the possibility of an omnipotent, benevolent God, any more than theists can establish the undoubted existence a perfect Creator. Theodicies, such as the argument for free will, provide possible explanations for reasoning for pain that we can observe within our scope of understanding. This explanation weighs heavily on a person s view of free-will though and is limited only to a plausible explanation. Mackie s argument that free will could exist without people choosing and having the opportunity to make evil choices is illogical. Humans would not truly be free to independently make decisions, if we were only limited to good decisions, pleasing a benevolent God. Ultimately, Hume s conclusion is the most reasonable one to make. The Problem of Evil provides a strong and compelling argument for why you shouldn t believe in God, but is unable to prove that one doesn t exist, so the skeptical theists are correct no matter their motivation. Without evidence it is impossible to declare that God s existence, only that the existence of evil is not strong enough evidence to dispel the possibility of the existence of a JCM, benevolent, omnipotent God. 6
7 Bibliography Kelly, D. (2018, January 25). Lecture 6:1-25. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/introphilspring2018lect6.pdf September 11th Terror Attacks Fast Facts. (2017, August 24). Retrieved February 03, 2018, from Hurricane Katrina Statistics Fast Facts. (2017, August 28). Retrieved February 03, 2018, from Hume, D. (n.d.). Hume Dialogues Part 10. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from Mackie, J. L. (n.d.). Free Will and the Problem of Evil. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from Kelly, D. (2018, January 30). Lecture 7:1-30. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from 7
New Chapter: Philosophy of Religion
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 6: 1-25 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Dennett, Show Me the Science b. Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (10) c.
More informationThe free will defense
The free will defense Last time we began discussing the central argument against the existence of God, which I presented as the following reductio ad absurdum of the proposition that God exists: 1. God
More informationWhy does a supposedly powerful and good God allow natural and moral evil to occur?
The Problem of Evil Two types of evil : Moral and Natural Moral Evil: The evil that people deliberately choose to do to one another Natural Evil: The evil that occurs naturally e.g. disease, natural disasters
More informationThe belief in the existence of an omniscient, omnipotent and benevolent God is inconsistent with the existence of human suffering. Discuss.
The belief in the existence of an omniscient, omnipotent and benevolent God is inconsistent with the existence of human suffering. Discuss. Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
More informationSwinburne. General Problem
Swinburne Why God Allows Evil 1 General Problem Why would an omnipotent, perfectly good God allow evil to exist? If there is not an adequate "theodicy," then the existence of evil is evidence against the
More informationProofs of Non-existence
The Problem of Evil Proofs of Non-existence Proofs of non-existence are strange; strange enough in fact that some have claimed that they cannot be done. One problem is with even stating non-existence claims:
More informationA CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment
A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE A Paper Presented to Dr. Douglas Blount Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for PHREL 4313 by Billy Marsh October 20,
More informationNew Chapter: Philosophy of Religion
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 3: 1-16 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Aquinas s The Summa Theologica (The Cosmological Argument) b. Anselm, Proslogium (The
More informationThe Problem of Evil. Prof. Eden Lin The Ohio State University
The Problem of Evil Prof. Eden Lin The Ohio State University Where We Are You have considered some questions about the nature of God: What does it mean for God to be omnipotent? Does God s omniscience
More informationEither God wants to abolish evil and cannot, or he can but does not want to, or he cannot and does not want to, or lastly he can and wants to.
1. Scientific Proof Against God In God: The Failed Hypothesis How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist, Victor J. Stenger offers this scientific argument against the existence of God: a) Hypothesize a
More informationThe problem of evil & the free will defense
The problem of evil & the free will defense Our topic today is the argument from evil against the existence of God, and some replies to that argument. But before starting on that discussion, I d like to
More informationWhence Evil? M. Andorf. Presented to the Fermi Society of Philosophy. December
Whence Evil? M. Andorf Presented to the Fermi Society of Philosophy. December 8 2017. Motivation In our meetings we frequently bring up the idea of beauty. As physicists we delight in the elegance of the
More information2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.
Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 October 25 & 27, 2016 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Schedule see syllabus as well! B. Questions? II. Refutation A. Arguments are typically used to establish conclusions.
More informationThe Riddle of Epicurus
Nada Amin 21L.448J Essay #2 Page 1 of 5 The Riddle of Epicurus In David Hume s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Voltaire s Candide, the characters struggle to reconcile the existence of evil with
More informationThe Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument The Cosmological Argument is an argument that attempts to demonstrate the existence of God using only one starting assumption: Something exists. 1. Three sorts of being: Whatever
More informationIS GOD "SIGNIFICANTLY FREE?''
IS GOD "SIGNIFICANTLY FREE?'' Wesley Morriston In an impressive series of books and articles, Alvin Plantinga has developed challenging new versions of two much discussed pieces of philosophical theology:
More informationCritical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments
5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments REMEMBER as explained in an earlier section formal language is used for expressing relations in abstract form, based on clear and unambiguous
More informationThe Problem of Evil Chapters 14, 15. B. C. Johnson & John Hick Introduction to Philosophy Professor Doug Olena
The Problem of Evil Chapters 14, 15 B. C. Johnson & John Hick Introduction to Philosophy Professor Doug Olena The Problem Stated If God is perfectly loving, he must wish to abolish evil; and if he is allpowerful,
More informationBasic Concepts and Skills!
Basic Concepts and Skills! Critical Thinking tests rationales,! i.e., reasons connected to conclusions by justifying or explaining principles! Why do CT?! Answer: Opinions without logical or evidential
More informationTWO NO, THREE DOGMAS OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY
1 TWO NO, THREE DOGMAS OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY 1.0 Introduction. John Mackie argued that God's perfect goodness is incompatible with his failing to actualize the best world that he can actualize. And
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationBIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH. September 29m 2016
BIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH September 29m 2016 REFLECTIONS OF GOD IN SCIENCE God s wisdom is displayed in the marvelously contrived design of the universe and its parts. God s omnipotence
More informationAS RELIGIOUS STUDIES. Component 1: Philosophy of religion and ethics Report on the Examination June Version: 1.0
AS RELIGIOUS STUDIES Component 1: Philosophy of religion and ethics Report on the Examination 7061 June 2017 Version: 1.0 Further copies of this Report are available from aqa.org.uk Copyright 2017 AQA
More informationCreation & necessity
Creation & necessity Today we turn to one of the central claims made about God in the Nicene Creed: that God created all things visible and invisible. In the Catechism, creation is described like this:
More informationDoes God exist? The argument from evil
Does God exist? The argument from evil There are two especially important arguments against belief in God. The first is based on the (alleged) lack of evidence for God s existence, and the rule that one
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Crito. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Introduction to Philosophy Crito Instructor: Jason Sheley Recall again our steps for doing philosophy 1) What is the question? 2) What is the basic answer to the question? 3) What reasons are given for
More informationC. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities
Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 March 19 & 24, 2015 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Roll B. Schedule C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know D. Discussion
More informationBy submitting this essay, I attest that it is my own work, completed in accordance with University regulations. Minh Alexander Nguyen
DRST 004: Directed Studies Philosophy Professor Matthew Noah Smith By submitting this essay, I attest that it is my own work, completed in accordance with University regulations. Minh Alexander Nguyen
More informationGod, Evil, and the Contemplation of Infinitely Many Options
Philosophic Exchange Volume 36 Number 1 Volume 36 (2005-2006) Article 2 2006 God, Evil, and the Contemplation of Infinitely Many Options Dean Zimmerman Rutgers University Follow this and additional works
More informationTheism and the Problem of Natural Disasters
Theism and the Problem of Natural Disasters Intro: We live in world of natural catastrophes. Almost every day scenes of pain and devastation are brought into our living rooms, the result of tornadoes,
More informationThe Clock without a Maker
The Clock without a Maker There are a many great questions in life in which people have asked themselves. Who are we? What is the meaning of life? Where do come from? This paper will be undertaking the
More informationBerkeley, Three dialogues between Hylas and Philonous focus on p. 86 (chapter 9) to the end (p. 93).
TOPIC: Lecture 7.2 Berkeley Lecture Berkeley will discuss why we only have access to our sense-data, rather than the real world. He will then explain why we can trust our senses. He gives an argument for
More informationPearson Edexcel International GCSE in Religious Studies (9-1) Paper 1: Islam Questions 1-3. Exemplar student answers with examiner comments
Pearson Edexcel International GCSE in Religious Studies (9-1) Paper 1: Islam Questions 1-3 Exemplar student answers with examiner comments Contents About this booklet 2 How to use this booklet 2 Paper
More informationSuffering. These icons indicate that teacher s notes or useful web addresses are available in the Notes Page.
Suffering These icons indicate that teacher s notes or useful web addresses are available in the Notes Page. This icon indicates the slide contains activities created in Flash. These activities are not
More informationEvidential arguments from evil
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48: 1 10, 2000. 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 1 Evidential arguments from evil RICHARD OTTE University of California at Santa
More informationFree will and foreknowledge
Free will and foreknowledge Jeff Speaks April 17, 2014 1. Augustine on the compatibility of free will and foreknowledge... 1 2. Edwards on the incompatibility of free will and foreknowledge... 1 3. Response
More informationToday s Lecture. Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie
Today s Lecture Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie Preliminary comments: A problem with evil The Problem of Evil traditionally understood must presume some or all of the following:
More informationNO GOD SUFFERING DOES NOT PROVE THERE IS SCOTT M. SULLIVAN WHY INTRODUCTORY COURSES IN CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS
Since God is the highest good, He would not allow any evil to exist in His works, unless His omnipotence and goodness were such as to bring good even out of evil. SAINT THOMAS AQUINAS WHY SUFFERING DOES
More informationPHIL 251 Varner 2018c Final exam Page 1 Filename = 2018c-Exam3-KEY.wpd
PHIL 251 Varner 2018c Final exam Page 1 Your first name: Your last name: K_E_Y Part one (multiple choice, worth 20% of course grade): Indicate the best answer to each question on your Scantron by filling
More informationPortfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7
Portfolio Project Phil 251A Logic Fall 2012 Due: Friday, December 7 1 Overview The portfolio is a semester-long project that should display your logical prowess applied to real-world arguments. The arguments
More informationQuaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Quaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion Volume 1 Issue 1 Volume 1, Issue 1 (Spring 2015) Article 4 April 2015 Infinity and Beyond James M. Derflinger II Liberty University,
More informationArgumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference
1 2 3 4 5 6 Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference of opinion. Often heated. A statement of
More informationDavid E. Alexander and Daniel Johnson, eds. Calvinism and the Problem of Evil.
David E. Alexander and Daniel Johnson, eds. Calvinism and the Problem of Evil. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2016. 318 pp. $62.00 (hbk); $37.00 (paper). Walters State Community College As David
More informationCommentary on Professor Tweyman's 'Hume on Evil' Pheroze S. Wadia Hume Studies Volume XIII, Number 1 (April, 1987)
Commentary on Professor Tweyman's 'Hume on Evil' Pheroze S. Wadia Hume Studies Volume XIII, Number 1 (April, 1987) 104-112. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES
More informationA Rejection of Skeptical Theism
Conspectus Borealis Volume 1 Issue 1 Article 8 2016 A Rejection of Skeptical Theism Mike Thousand Northern Michigan University, mthousan@nmu.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.nmu.edu/conspectus_borealis
More informationPaley s Inductive Inference to Design
PHILOSOPHIA CHRISTI VOL. 7, NO. 2 COPYRIGHT 2005 Paley s Inductive Inference to Design A Response to Graham Oppy JONAH N. SCHUPBACH Department of Philosophy Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan
More informationMoore on External Relations
Moore on External Relations G. J. Mattey Fall, 2005 / Philosophy 156 The Dogma of Internal Relations Moore claims that there is a dogma held by philosophers such as Bradley and Joachim, that all relations
More informationDoes God exist? The argument from evil
Does God exist? The argument from evil One of the oldest, and most important, arguments against the existence of God tries to show that the idea that God is all-powerful and all-good contradicts a very
More informationIs the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible?
Is the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible? Anders Kraal ABSTRACT: Since the 1960s an increasing number of philosophers have endorsed the thesis that there can be no such thing as
More informationSwinburne: The Problem of Evil
Swinburne: The Problem of Evil THE PROBLEM: The Problem of Evil: An all-powerful being would be able to prevent evil from happening in the world. An all-good being would want to prevent evil from happening
More information3 The Problem of Absolute Reality
3 The Problem of Absolute Reality How can the truth be found? How can we determine what is the objective reality, what is the absolute truth? By starting at the beginning, having first eliminated all preconceived
More informationTWO VERSIONS OF HUME S LAW
DISCUSSION NOTE BY CAMPBELL BROWN JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY DISCUSSION NOTE MAY 2015 URL: WWW.JESP.ORG COPYRIGHT CAMPBELL BROWN 2015 Two Versions of Hume s Law MORAL CONCLUSIONS CANNOT VALIDLY
More informationThe Problem of Evil. Why would a good God create a world where bad things happen?
The Problem of Evil Why would a good God create a world where bad things happen? The Theist s Response God has a plan. Theism has many responses to the problem of evil. But they all seem to involve, in
More informationDETERMINISM is the view that all events without exception are effects or, a little
DETERMINISM is the view that all events without exception are effects or, a little more carefully, that every event is fully caused by its antecedent conditions or causal circumstances. The conditions
More informationTranshumanists, God, and the Problem of Evil
135 Essay Transhumanists, God, and the Problem of Evil Brent Allsop ABSTRACT Powerful Good beings( i.e. Gods) can be defined to be both able and willing to overcome evils like death and suffering. Any
More informationChrist-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating
More informationEarly Modern Moral Philosophy. Lecture 5: Hume
Early Modern Moral Philosophy Lecture 5: Hume The plan for today 1. The mythical Hume 2. The motivation argument 3. Is Hume a non-cognitivist? 4. Does Hume accept Hume s Law? 5. Mary Astell 1. The mythical
More informationForeknowledge, evil, and compatibility arguments
Foreknowledge, evil, and compatibility arguments Jeff Speaks January 25, 2011 1 Warfield s argument for compatibilism................................ 1 2 Why the argument fails to show that free will and
More informationThe Evidential Argument from Evil
DANIEL HOWARD-SNYDER INTRODUCTION: The Evidential Argument from Evil 1. The "Problem of Evil Evil, it is often said, poses a problem for theism, the view that there is an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly
More informationLogic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationThe Argument from Evil. Why doesn t God do something?
The Argument from Evil Why doesn t God do something? David Hume The whole earth, believe me, Philo, is cursed and polluted. A perpetual war is kindled amongst all living creatures. Necessity, hunger, want
More informationTheme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS
A. Inductive arguments cosmological Inductive proofs Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS the concept of a posteriori. Cosmological argument: St Thomas Aquinas first Three Ways 1.
More informationWhy There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics
Davis 1 Why There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics William Davis Red River Undergraduate Philosophy Conference North Dakota State University
More informationA R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N
ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around
More informationFoundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology
1. Introduction Ryan C. Smith Philosophy 125W- Final Paper April 24, 2010 Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology Throughout this paper, the goal will be to accomplish three
More informationHow do Christians respond to the problem of evil? R Calvert, Colton Hills Community School 1
How do Christians respond to the problem of evil? R Calvert, Colton Hills Community School 1 Omnipotent all powerful Omniscient all knowing Benevolent all good/ kind Christians believe God is: If God is
More informationIs the Existence of Heaven Compatible with the Existence of Hell? James Cain
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Southwest Philosophy Review, July 2002, pp. 153-58. Is the Existence of Heaven Compatible with the Existence of Hell?
More informationUNIT 4 PROBLEM OF EVIL
UNIT 4 PROBLEM OF EVIL Contents 4.0 Objectives 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Types of Evils 4.3 Logical Argument from Evil 4.4 Typology of Evils 4.5 Theories of Evil: Western perspective 4.6 Problem of Evil: Indian
More informationPhilosophy of Religion 21: (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas
Philosophy of Religion 21:161-169 (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas A defense of middle knowledge RICHARD OTTE Cowell College, University of Calfiornia, Santa Cruz,
More informationLogical Puzzles and the Concept of God
Logical Puzzles and the Concept of God [This is a short semi-serious discussion between me and three former classmates in March 2010. S.H.] [Sue wrote on March 24, 2010:] See attached cartoon What s your
More informationA Case for Christianity
Introduction to Christian Apologetics A Case for Christianity By J.R. Allebach A Case for Christianity Bibliography Holy Scripture The Origin of the Bible, Philip Wesley Comfort The Reasonableness of Faith,
More informationGenre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science
Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science 1. Social Science Essays Social sciences encompass a range of disciplines; each discipline uses a range of techniques, styles, and structures of writing.
More informationSt. Anselm s versions of the ontological argument
St. Anselm s versions of the ontological argument Descartes is not the first philosopher to state this argument. The honor of being the first to present this argument fully and clearly belongs to Saint
More informationSkepticism is True. Abraham Meidan
Skepticism is True Abraham Meidan Skepticism is True Copyright 2004 Abraham Meidan All rights reserved. Universal Publishers Boca Raton, Florida USA 2004 ISBN: 1-58112-504-6 www.universal-publishers.com
More informationThe Miseries of Life: Hume and the Problem of Evil Tony Pitson Hume Studies Volume 34, Number 1, (2008) pp. 89 114. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES Terms
More informationPHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE
PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE One: What ought to be the primary objective of your essay? The primary objective of your essay is not simply to present information or arguments, but to put forward a cogent argument
More informationCritical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics
Critical Thinking The Very Basics (at least as I see them) Dona Warren Department of Philosophy The University of Wisconsin Stevens Point What You ll Learn Here I. How to recognize arguments II. How to
More informationMind Association. Oxford University Press and Mind Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Mind.
Mind Association Evil and Omnipotence Author(s): J. L. Mackie Source: Mind, New Series, Vol. 64, No. 254 (Apr., 1955), pp. 200-212 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association
More informationArgument Mapping. Table of Contents. By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012
Argument Mapping By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012 Table of Contents Argument Mapping...1 Introduction...2 Chapter 1: Examples of argument maps...2 Chapter 2: The difference between multiple arguments and
More informationThe Ontological Argument
Running Head: THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1 The Ontological Argument By Andy Caldwell Salt Lake Community College Philosophy of Religion 2350 THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 2 Abstract This paper will reproduce,
More informationIs Natural Theology A Form of Deism? By Dr. Robert A. Morey
Is Natural Theology A Form of Deism? By Dr. Robert A. Morey Deism is alive and well today not only in liberal Protestantism but also in neo- Evangelical circles. It comes in many different forms. But at
More informationMILL ON JUSTICE: CHAPTER 5 of UTILITARIANISM Lecture Notes Dick Arneson Philosophy 13 Fall, 2005
1 MILL ON JUSTICE: CHAPTER 5 of UTILITARIANISM Lecture Notes Dick Arneson Philosophy 13 Fall, 2005 Some people hold that utilitarianism is incompatible with justice and objectionable for that reason. Utilitarianism
More informationWhat is Atheism? How is Atheism Defined?: Who Are Atheists? What Do Atheists Believe?:
1 What is Atheism? How is Atheism Defined?: The more common understanding of atheism among atheists is "not believing in any gods." No claims or denials are made - an atheist is any person who is not a
More informationCreative Responsibility
Chapter 10 Creative Responsibility We are responsible for life! However, much of our reality is caught up in making others responsible for what happens to us instead, especially if what happens causes
More informationPhilosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 2. Background Material for the Exercise on Inference Indicators
Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics Critical Thinking Lecture 2 Background Material for the Exercise on Inference Indicators Inference-Indicators and the Logical Structure of an Argument 1. The Idea
More informationIntroductory Matters
1 Introductory Matters The readings in this section take up some topics that set the stage for discussion to follow. The first addresses the value of philosophy, the second the nature of truth, and the
More informationA Critique of the Free Will Defense, A Comprehensive Look at Alvin Plantinga s Solution To the Problem of Evil.
University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2013 A Critique of the Free Will Defense, A Comprehensive Look at Alvin
More informationIs Morality Rational?
PHILOSOPHY 431 Is Morality Rational? Topic #3 Betsy Spring 2010 Kant claims that violations of the categorical imperative are irrational acts. This paper discusses that claim. Page 2 of 6 In Groundwork
More informationLeibniz, Principles, and Truth 1
Leibniz, Principles, and Truth 1 Leibniz was a man of principles. 2 Throughout his writings, one finds repeated assertions that his view is developed according to certain fundamental principles. Attempting
More informationThis We Believe Awesome God
This We Believe Awesome God Statement 2 Statement of faith of the Evangelical Free Church of America We believe there is one God, Creator of all things, infinitely perfect and eternally existing in three
More informationHume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Hume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017 / Philosophy 1 After Descartes The greatest success of the philosophy of Descartes was that it helped pave the way for the mathematical
More informationCritique of Cosmological Argument
David Hume: Critique of Cosmological Argument Critique of Cosmological Argument DAVID HUME (1711-1776) David Hume is one of the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Born in Edinburgh,
More informationOutline. The Resurrection Considered. Edwin Chong. Broader context Theistic arguments The resurrection Counter-arguments Craig-Edwards debate
The Resurrection Considered Edwin Chong July 22, 2007 Life@Faith 7-22-07 Outline Broader context Theistic arguments The resurrection Counter-arguments Craig-Edwards debate Life@Faith 7-22-07 2 1 Broader
More informationA Rational Approach to Reason
4. Martha C. Nussbaum A Rational Approach to Reason My essay is an attempt to understand the author who has posed in the quote the problem of how people get swayed by demagogues without examining their
More informationThe Attributes of God
The Attributes of God The nature of God what God is like. Omnipotence People wonder whether the concept of God s omnipotence is compatible with his other attributes omniscience and omnibenevolence: Illogical
More informationRecall. Validity: If the premises are true the conclusion must be true. Soundness. Valid; and. Premises are true
Recall Validity: If the premises are true the conclusion must be true Soundness Valid; and Premises are true Validity In order to determine if an argument is valid, we must evaluate all of the sets of
More informationAm I free? Freedom vs. Fate
Am I free? Freedom vs. Fate We ve been discussing the free will defense as a response to the argument from evil. This response assumes something about us: that we have free will. But what does this mean?
More informationThe Ontological Argument for the existence of God. Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011
The Ontological Argument for the existence of God Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011 The ontological argument (henceforth, O.A.) for the existence of God has a long
More informationEmpiricism. HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3
Empiricism HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3 What can give us more sure knowledge than our senses? How else can we distinguish between the true & the false? -Lucretius The Dream by Henri Rousseau
More informationIn Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg
1 In Search of the Ontological Argument Richard Oxenberg Abstract We can attend to the logic of Anselm's ontological argument, and amuse ourselves for a few hours unraveling its convoluted word-play, or
More information