Process Theology A critical evaluation of its methodology
|
|
- Cameron Richards
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ProcessTheology Acriticalevaluationofitsmethodology ByJobThomas AtheologicalevaluationforthecourseSeminarHistoricalTheology Professor: Dr.RonMichener EVANGELICALTHEOLOGICALFACULTY St.Jansbergsesteenweg97 B 3001Heverlee January29 th,2009
2 2 Tableofcontents Introduction 3 ThePlay:ProcessTheologicalMethodology 3 TheStoryboard:HistoryofProcessThought 3 TheFirstActor:Philosophy 5 TheSecondActor:Science(andHumanExperience) 6 TheThirdActor:Scripture 7 TheStageSetting:Praxis 8 TheCritics:Evaluation 8 TheEnthusiast:Strengths 9 TheUnconvinced:Weaknesses 10 Conclusion 14 Bibliography 15
3 3 Introduction Inthispaperwewanttoevaluateprocesstheologicalmethodology.Processtheologyisa theological approach strongly influenced by the thought of change in reality. Based on philosophy and scientific observation process theologians conclude that reality is dynamicandchangesconstantly.theconsequenceisthemhavingdifficultyviewinggodas a static Being according to them the position of classic theism. In doing that process theologyputsanemphasisonnaturaltheology. While process theology presents some interesting insights in the dynamics of God sacting,wearenotconvincedbytheoverallnegativeapproachtowardsclassictheism. Process theology offers a too biased evaluation of classic theism and does not do credittoitsrichhistory.nexttousingphilosophyandscience,processtheologymakesa veryselectivechoiceofbiblepassagesindefendingitspremises.thedefendersrightly show a biblical God that changes his mind and brings human effort into account, but they neglect the more static attributes of God such as his omniscience and omnipotence shown in numerous Bible verses. The key problem is that they have difficulty acknowledging the paradox often portrayed in God s character. A paradox that makes quitesenseinviewofourhumanfiniteness. ThePlay:ProcessTheologicalMethodology Beforeevaluatingtheprocesstheologicalmethod,itisgoodtogiveanoverviewofthis methodology. We want to address four features of process methodology. Before doing thatwewanttogiveahistoricalsketchofprocessthought. TheStoryboard:HistoryofProcessThought Thoughbeingintroducedinthetwentiethcentury,processtheologyhasanancientpredecessorinthethoughtofeternalfluxandbecomingnessoftheworld,introducedbythe Greek philosopher Heraclitus (ca BC). He is especially known for his rivalry withparmenides,whooptedforastaticapproach. 1 Youcannotsteptwiceintothesame 1Ed.L.Miller&StanleyJ.Grenz,FortressIntroductiontoContemporaryTheologies(Minneapolis, MN:Fortress,1998),91.
4 4 river, Heraclituscharged. 2 LivingstoneandFiorenzaaddthatalsotheGermanRomantic philosophyandthechangingworldviewintroducedbythedarwinianrevolutionplayed animportantroleinthedevelopmentofprocessthought. 3 OneofthemorerecentpredecessorsofprocesstheologyisfoundinAlfredNorth Whitehead, a process philosopher who proposed getting rid of traditional metaphysics beingallaboutsubstances andreplacingitwiththeideaofprocesses. 4 Hisaim wastodevelopaconceptofrealityfittingthemodernscientificapproachesthathadreplacethenewtonianparadigm. 5 Insteadofpresupposingallrealthingshavingasimple location,timebeingindependentofallotherthingsandtherelationofthingsbeingexternal and accidental, modern science put more emphasis on interrelatedness. Whitehead s metaphysical scheme consists of four factors: actual occasions, eternal objects, Godandcreativity.Thelatterthreearenon existingrealities.theworldconsistsofthe actualoccasions,whiletheotherthreefunctionasformalcategoriesgivingshapetothe world. 6 WhiteheadattemptedtoshowhowGodactsintheworldthatweactuallyknow; aworldcharacterizedbytemporalityandfreedom.godandthisfreeworldmutuallyact upononeanother. 7 onlyalternative,hartshornefavourspanentheism,meaningthattheworldisincludedin God sbeingandthatgodandworldareinterdependent. 8 Panentheismemphasizesthat Another important philosopher is Charles Hartshorne, who believes that traditionalchristiansupernaturalismisnolongertenable.insteadofdeclaringatheismasthe Godgoesbeyondthecreatedreality,buttherealityisanessentialpartofGod. Every 2StanleyJ.Grenz&RogerE.Olson,Twentieth centurytheology:godandtheworldinatransitional Age(DownersGrove,IL:InterVarsity,1992),130. 3JamesC.Livingstone&FrancisSchlüsslerFiorenza,ModernChristianThought,vol.2,The TwentiethCentury,2 nd ed.(minneapolis,mn:fortress,2006),309;cf.grenz&olson,twentieth century Theology,130.LivingstoneandFiorenzaaddtheBuddhistdoctrinesofbecomingandinterdependenceas asource,butthisdoesnotconvinceme.idobelievethatthisthoughtcouldhavehadaninfluenceon Cobb,basedonhisbackgroundintheAsianmissionaryfield(cf.Grenz&Olson,Twentieth century Theology,140),butIdidnotfindthistobereportedasamajorsourceinanyoftheotherconsultedworks. 4JonathanHill,TheHistoryofChristianThought(DownersGrove,IL:InterVarsity,2003),309. 5Grenz&Olson,Twentieth centurytheology,135. 6Ibid. 7Livingstone&Fiorenza,ModernChristianThought,315. 8Ibid.,317.
5 5 thing isingod. Thishasthelogical consequencethat ifsomethingchangeswithin the knownworld,thisinfluencesgod,sincethischangeoccurswithinhim. ProbablythemostimportantprocesstheologianisJohnCobb.Hegivesattentionto God s consequent nature; God s effects on the world and the effects of the world on God. 9 CobbdoesnotfollowWhitehead ssomewhatvagueandimpersonalviewofgod andoptsforgodbeingaperson,asdidhartshorne: 10 Myconclusion,then,isthatthechiefreasonforinsistingthatGodisanactualentity canbesatisfiedbytheviewthatheisalivingperson,thatthisviewmakesthedoctrineofgodmorecoherent,andthatnoseriousnewdifficultiesarise. 11 TheFirstActor:Philosophy Themethodofprocesstheologyisaplayinwhichthreeactorsandonesettingarethe mainfeatures.wewillstartbyhighlightingtheactors.thefirstactorisphilosophy.remarkable about Cobb is that his work is an effort to reconceive Christian theology through an explicit engagement with modern philosophy and natural and social sciences. 12 Soprocesstheologylinksphilosophicalinterpretationwiththeologicalimplications.ProcesstheologyputsanemphasisonHeraclitus conceptofchange.itsdefenders state that [change] is fundamental to the universe, rather than something that merely happenstothethingsinit. 13 Followingfromthis,processthoughtforexampledescribes oneofthemainaspectsofgodtobehismutability.sinceheisrelatedtohumanbeings and to the world, He has to change because both humans and the world they live in change. 14 Godisnotasubstanceoutsideoftime,butachangingCharacter. 15 Inclaiming 9Ibid., JohnW.Cooper,Panentheism:TheOtherGodofthePhilosophers(GrandRapids,MI:Baker Academic,2006), In:ibid. 12Livingstone&Fiorenza,ModernChristianThought, Hill,HistoryofChristianThought, BruceA.Ware, AnExpositionandCritiqueoftheProcessDoctrinesofDivineMutabilityand Immutability, WestminsterTheologicalJournal47(1985): Hill,HistoryofChristianThought,310.
6 6 this,processtheologydoesnotchargetheclassicaltheismbeingwronginconceivingof God as absolute, independent, and immutable, but in conceiving him as such exclusively. 16 ProcesstheologyseeksnotonlytoconnectwiththeancientthoughtofHeraclitus. It is in the first place a theological approach that wants to link up with contemporary findings. More then a decade after publishing his Process Theology, Cobb describes his approach as a postmodern philosophy. He expresses his awe for deconstructive postmodernism,sinceitaddressesinaveryclearwaythesameissuesasdoesprocesstheology. 17 There are clear distinctions though. Process thought does not equal modernity withreason.itdoesnotseepostmodernismasamerereactiontothefailureofreason. As Whitehead has shown, (medieval) reason is something that has been rejected in many respects by modernity. 18 Cobb claims that deconstructionists use the same critiqueasdidmodernists,buttheystripitfromthepositivecontentofmodernity. 19 Processtheologytriestogobeyondthiscritique.Itshouldbeclearthattheprotagonistof theplayisphilosophy. TheSecondActor:Science(andHumanExperience) AsecondactorisScience andcloserelatedtothat:humanexperience.characteristic formanyprocesstheologiansistheybegantheircareersasscientistorhadastrongempiricistinterestandstatedtheirphilosophicalwork,counteringthethendominantscientificpositivism. 20 Itisinthisviewnotsurprisingthatfoundationaltoprocesstheology isthereconciliationbetweentheologyandscience. 21 Although acknowledging the development of theology being linked to the faith community,cobbappealedtothepresenceoftheologizingoutofthatcommunitytoes 16Ware, ProcessDoctrines, JohnB.Cobb,Jr., TwoTypesofPostmodernism:DeconstructionandProcess, TheologyToday 47,no.2(1990): Ibid. 19Ibid. 20Livingstone&Fiorenza,ModernChristianThought, Grenz&Olson,Twentieth centurytheology,131.
7 7 tablishanaturaltheology. 22 Thisnaturaltheology,ratherthanrevelation,isageneral characteristicofprocesstheology.it formsthestartingpointforthetheologicalenterprise. 23 Processtheologiansareconvincedthat [not]onlymusttheconceptofgodnot contradict scientific thinking, it must move from a naturalistic starting point, which is completelyopentoscientificinvestigation. 24 Whiteheadhimselfisquiteclearonthisin statingthat religionrequiresametaphysicalbacking;foritsauthorityisendangeredby the intensity of the emotions which it generates. 25 This shows again the very strong connectionprocessthoughtwantstomaintainbetweentheirtheologyandthecontemporaryphilosophy. Itisclearthatprocesstheologyoffersroomforhumanexperience.Itisnotafraid to use human existential questions as a starting point to develop theology. A beautiful example is the question about the use of prayer within a classic theistic view. Ford pointsoutthattheologicalreflectiononprayerfromthispointofviewisquiterare.he thinks this being logic: [if] God orders and controls all things in accordance with his eternalpurpose,whatdifferencedoourprayersmake? 26 TheThirdActor:Scripture ThethirdactorinourplayisScripture orbiblicalhermeneutics.aswewillseelaterin the critical evaluation, Scripture does not have the leading role, as is the case within opentheism.significantly,ford spublishingabiblicalsupportforprocesstheologywas duesomeyearsafterthefamousbookbycobbandgriffin. 27 Wehavetosaythoughthat his biblical argumentation is rather scarce. Ford for instance gives us the example of 22Ibid., Ibid., Ibid., AlfredNorthWhitehead, ReligionandMetaphysics, inprocessphilosophyandchristianthought, eds.delwinbrown,ralphe.james,jr.,&genereeves(indianapolis,in;newyork,ny:thebobbs Merrill Company,1971):67. 26LewisS.Ford, OurPrayersasGod spassions, inreligiousexperienceandprocesstheology:the PastoralImplicationsofaMajorModernMovement,eds.HarryJamesCargas&BernardLee(NewYork,NY: Paulist,1976): LewisS.Ford,TheLureofGod:ABiblicalBackgroundforProcessTheism(Philadelphia,PA: Fortress,1978).
8 8 Jesusgrowinginknowledge,tryingtoproveGoddoesnottranscendallrationalstructureswhatsoever. 28 WhatprocesstheologyemphasizesisthatGodchangeshisopinion fromtimetotime.hemakeshisdecisionsbasedonthereactionofhiscreation. TheStageSetting:Praxis Thereisafinalimportantfeaturetoconsiderinthemethodologyofprocesstheology.As shouldbeclearbythedescriptionoftheactors,processtheologyismuchinvolvedwith theenvironmentwithinwhichitoperates.wewanttodescribethisfeatureasthestage setting of the practical theological play. Process theology puts a big emphasis on the connectionbetweentheologyandthe praxis.theecologicalcrisismadecobbawareof thisnecessity. 29 Theologycannotbedoneinisolationfromitsethicalapplication. 30 For Cobb, a logical consequence of the process approach to theology was abandoning his preliminarydesiretowriteasystematictheology.doingthatwouldbeameretryingto grasptheessenceofchristianfaithinanabstractmanner,whileprocesstheologyemphasizestheactualgoaloftheologybeingtheattempttotransformreality. 31 Process theology tries to live out the principle of interconnectedness. While other especiallymoremodern theologiesarehesitanttowardssubjectivityandcontextualisation, process theology sees this to be a requirement for good theology: if worldviews change, than so should theology. This connection with the contemporary contextandtheethicalpraxisisthesettingwithinwhichprocesstheologyfounditright toexist. TheCritics:Evaluation overview of the strengths of process theology. Then we will offer a summary of some Wewanttocontinueintheplayanalogy.Asisthecaseforanyplay,criticscometoevaluatehowtheactorsperformedandhowwellthestagewasset.Firstwewillgivean importantweaknessesofthethought.wewillpresentourowncritiquewithinthisev 28Ibid., Miller&Grenz,ContemporaryTheologies,89. 30Livingstone&Fiorenza,ModernChristianThought, Miller&Grenz,ContemporaryTheologies,91.
9 9 aluation,summarizingitintheconcludingparagraph.asitwasthecaseintheprevious paragraphs,itisnotalwayseasytoplacecritiqueinacertaincategory. TheEnthusiast:Strengths Somecriticsareveryenthusiasticaboutprocesstheology.Itattemptstoprovideareasonable explanation for some flaws within classic theism. First process theology addresses contemporary philosophy in a quite attractive way. Philosophy and theology have always been closely related and process theology exploits this kinship. One gives theconceptofchangepropertimeforreflectionandwebelievethisbeingagooddecision.ithasdonesowithinfluence.aslivingstoneandfiorenzapointout: Process theology has [ ] influenced theological thinking in profound ways. While refusingtoappropriatetheentireprocessmetaphysicalscheme,theologiansfindits critique of aspects of classical theism e.g., the latter s often ill advised concentrationonthedivinetranscendence tobesalutary. 32 There is attention for philosophical grounds of theology. This acknowledgement is a goodwayofintegratingphilosophyintotheology. Second,processtheologyresearchesthedepthsofscienceandhumanexperience. Gamwell, amongst others, uses the process theologians as good examples of avoiding exclusive appeal to the Christian community since they integrate a more general languageandthoughtintheirphilosophy. 33 Oftenclassicaltheismhasneglectedthecommongroundofmetaphysics.Anorientationtowardstheuseofamoregenerallanguage oftheologyisimportant.thisiswhattheprocesstheologiansaredoingorareatleast tryingtodo. 34 Third, process theology has a place for some of the more difficult Bible passage presentinggodasadynamicentityandnotsomuchasastaticbeing.hillconfirms: The strengthofprocesstheologyliespartlyinitsappealtothebible. 35 Innumerousbiblical passages God is described as an acting character. He does things. Collins sees process 32Livingstone&Fiorenza,ModernChristianThought, FranklinI.Gamwell, SpeakingofGodafterAquinas, JournalofReligion81,no.2(2001): Ibid. 35Hill,HistoryofChristianThought,310.
10 10 hermeneuticsasaframeworkforbiblicalstudy.itis,accordingtohim,a refreshingaffirmationofthepubliccharacteroftheology. 36 Ontheotherhand,hedoesnotwantto goasfarasprocesstheologyinavoidingallchristianlanguage. 37 Finally,theemphasisprocesstheologiansputontheconnectionbetweentheology andtheethicalpraxischarmedus.althoughthisisnotexcludedwithinaclassicaltheism,thedangerofneglectingone sresponsibilitiesinlightofthestaticbeingthatgodis, is more real. Giving room to change and dynamics leaves no room for denying human responsibilityinethics. TheUnconvinced:Weaknesses Process theology according to us has also some weaknesses. First we want to give imageofthestaticgod,processtheologiansseemtothrowthechildwiththebathwater away.thethoughthasamajorweaknessinnotacknowledginggod stranscendence. 38 some philosophical points of attention. Process theology takes philosophy as the protagonist.intryingtoestablishamoregeneralapproachandleavingthemoretraditional ThetheologypaysattentiontotheimmanenceofGod,butindoingsolosesGod stranscendence,alsobeinganimportantcharacteristic. 39 Theytendtoseetheseparationbetweenclassicaltheismandprocesstheismtooblack and white.processtheologyholds two options for Christians: they choose the entire classic theism package (Thomism, accordingtonash)ortheyrejectit.thereisnothirdalternativetothem. 40 Theseselfconstructedlimitsaremostlybasedinanoversimplifiedviewontraditionaltheism.The interestingthingisthatprocesstheology regularlytooeasy seesclassictheismasa mere product of Aristotelian philosophy. According to this view, God is an immovable staticbeing. 41 Onecouldquestionthough whilestillholdingontogod sabsoluteness 36JohnJ.Collins, ProcessHermeneutics:PromiseandProblems, Semeia24(1982): Ibid. 38Hill,HistoryofChristianThought, Grenz&Olson,Twentieth centurytheology, RonaldH.Nash, ProcessTheologyandClassicalTheism, inprocesstheology,ed.ronaldh.nash (GrandRapids,MI:Baker,1987):21. 41F.DuaneLindsey, AnEvangelicalOverviewofProcessTheology, BibliothecaSacra134,no.533 (1977):28.
11 11 andimmutability whetherthebiblicalviewofgodisthisstatic.sometheologianssee noproblemintheparadoxofthebecomingandthebeingofgod. 42 Wesupportthis.This is something Cobb and Griffin acknowledge as well: one needs to be careful in seeing everythingasinprocess, forthatwouldmeanthateventhefactthatthingsareinprocessissubjecttochange. 43 Further, process theology has been questioned in its statements. Some of those containacontradictiointerminis,oratleastseemtodoso.forexampleprocesstheology has defended God s always present attribute of love, but this seems irreconcilable withtheever changingcharacterofgod. 44 Interestingisprocesstheology,asfaraslove is concerned, having difficulty with the who Cobb and Griffin call impassive God of traditionaltheism. 45 Warerightlyaddressesthesemantic game ofprocesstheology.he givesthefollowingexplanation: What really is the meaning [ ] of God's independence, for example, or God's immutability?tosaythatgodisindependentistosaythathe,unlikeallotherentities, iseminentlydependent;thatis,godisindependentofallelseinthisrespectthathe alonedependsonallelse.likewisewithgod'simmutability.godisimmutableprecisely insofar as his maximal changing never ceases. To speak of one who is maximally dependent and changing as also independent and immutable strikes me as odd,tosaytheleast,andmisleading. 46 statement, so the claim itself cannot be absolute. 47 Lindsey shows that many process Ware s difficulty with process theology is their not acknowledging this game. He comparesitwithepistemologicalrelativism.ifeverythingisrelative,eventhisisarelative theologiansrecognizetheinadequacyofaristotelianismandneoplatonismasafoundationforchristianfaith.heremarksitbeingstrangethattheynominateonemorehuman philosophytofillthisrole Livingstone&Fiorenza,ModernChristianThought, JohnB.Cobb,Jr.,&DavidRayGriffin,ProcessTheology:AnIntroductoryExposition(Louisville,KY: WestminsterJohnKnow,1976),14. 44Grenz&Olson,Twentieth century, Cobb&Griffin,ProcessTheology,44. 46Ware, ProcessDoctrines, Ibid. 48Lindsey, EvangelicalProcessTheology, 27.
12 12 natural sciences, process philosophy and theology are incompatible with the modern Second, some critics believe process theology to be depending too much on science.alsothisproducessomedifficulties.despitetheattempttoreconciletheologyand scientificunderstandings.itisactuallyrepresentingastunnedontologywhenonecomparesitwiththecomplexityoftheworldnowbeingdiscovered. 49 Alsowithinthescientificparadigmonecandiscoverincompatibilitieswithinpro cesstheology.in doingtheology CobbandGriffinforinstancearenotdeploringsubjec tivity.theyputtoattentiontheselectiveemphasisondoctrines,butaddthat selectivity and emphasis are essential to any ordered experience, and hence to any experience whatsoever. 50 Thisiscontrastedwiththeireffortmakingitappearthattheirpositionis more consistent with the teaching of Holy Scripture than classic theism. 51 One would expect a more modest claim. Cooper calls process theology the deism of the twentieth century, since process theologians as did defenders of deism in the nineteenth cen tury consideredtheirphilosophicalconvictiontobethemostrationalofthecontem poraryworldviews. 52 Thereliesgreatdangerinseeingtheexperiencesoftheworldmakinguptheconcrete,realbeingofGod. [What]basisdowehaveforimaginingthatthecharacterofGod is any different from the character of the world? unless, of course, there is in God a moralnaturethatknowsandupholdsthatwhichisjustandrightquiteapartfromhis experienceoftheworld. 53 Withinthisparadigm,Godisalldependingonwhathiscre ationdoes.whilewedobelievethatgodmakesroominhisdecisionsforwhathiscre ationdoes,itisquiteanotherthingtoputthecreatorasdependingonhiscreation. Third,wewanttomakesomeremarkonprocesstheologicaluseoftheBible.While opentheists,suchasclarkpinnock,donotfullyagreeuponprocesstheology,theyseeit offeringgreatinsightasfarmasthedynamicsofgodareconcerned. 54 Therearemajor 49Grenz&Olson,Twentieth centurytheology, Cobb&Griffin,ProcessTheology,34. 51Nash, ProcessTheologyandClassicalTheism, Cooper,Panentheism, Ware, ProcessDoctrines, ClarckH.Pinnock, BetweenClassicalandProcessTheism, inprocesstheology,ed.ronaldh. Nash(GrandRapids,MI:Baker,1987):313.
13 13 differences as well. The two most important are the normative order of Scripture and philosophy where Scriptures are fundamental and theology precedes philosophy andtheultimatedifferencebetweentheactandthefactofgodandman. 55 WhileprocesstheologyemphasizestheinterdependenceofGodandman,opentheismseesGodas theultimatemetaphysicalfact.inopentheismgodismetaphysicallynotboundbythe thingshedoes. 56 It is logical that one has presuppositions in doing hermeneutics, but we have the idea thatprocesstheologydoessomeseriousreadingintothetextandistooselective. Fourth, although process theology does well in connecting theology with the praxis,theirclaimsofclassictheismnotdoingthisarebiasedandnotnuanced.wedo Weunderstandthat Cobb wantstocreateamoregeneralplatform fortheologizing,buthischoicetoputphilosophyandsciencebeforescripture,doesnotconvinceus. notentirelyagreewithhill,describingprocesstheologyasa desperate attempttorestatetraditionaldoctrinesformodernears,butwecanunderstandhiscritique. 57 Cobb spanentheismdoesofferakindofeschatologicalhope,butitisnotcomparable with the optimistic faith in inevitable process. Through human and divine joint effortitispossibletodothingsthatmatter. 58 Thisisaccordingtousatoostrongemphasisonhumaneffortandthe makeability ofabetterworld.theologyshouldmake theconnectionwithethics,butitcannotforgetitspositionasservantofgod swill. thepersonalinteractionofgodandman.godforinstancechangeshismindindialogue with Abraham, Moses and the repentant people of Nineveh after Jonah s visit. Still the Finally and this is a more spiritual critique process theology is lacking a personalgod.thisisquiteremarkableatfirstsight,sinceprocessthoughtmakeswayfor imageofgodprocesstheologysketchesseemscoldandimpersonal.inthisview,wedeliberatelychosethestageillustration.processtheologyoffersusaplaywecanattendto, butitdoesnotleaveroomforthetheologian oreventhechristianingeneral toengageintheplay,astheologyshould.theologyisnotameredescriptionofwhogodis, butanactiveprocessinwhichthetheologiancannotstandonthesideline,buthasto 55Ibid.,318 9;Cooper,Panentheism, Pinnock, BetweenClassicalandProcessTheism, Hill,HistoryofChristianThought, Livingstone&Fiorenza,ModernChristianThought,331.
14 14 engageactively.processthought quiteparadoxicalactually doesnotpaymuchattentiontothisandindoingsoismissingoneofthequintessentialfeaturesofchristianity. Conclusion Processtheologyoffersbothgreatinsightsandaworthygoalfortheology.Itistruethat some biblical passages are difficult to reconcile with the static God of most dominant Greekphilosophy.Atthesametime,theclaimthattheologyshouldconnectwithmodern philosophy and science and that it should focus on praxis is rightful. Our big problem withprocesstheologyisthatitstheologianscreateapolaritybetweenthemselvesand classictheismandaretoomuchdenyingthestrengthsofthelatter.wethinkthatprocesstheologyprovidesanoteworthyadditiontotheologicalmethod,butdoesnotconvince as a solely standing theological system. In this regard, we want to end with the wordsofnash: CertainfeaturesofwhathasbeencalledtheclassicalconceptofGodrequiremodification. But it is quite another thing to demand that the whole traditional Christian conceptofgodbescrappedinfavorofagodwhoisneitheromnipotentnoromniscient. This is as bad a bargain as exchanging Aladdin s old lamp for a shiny new one Nash, ProcessTheologyandClassicalTheism, 26.
15 15 Bibliography Brown,Delwin. RespectfortheRocks :TowardsaChristianProcessTheologyof Nature. Encounter50,no.4(1989): Cobb,JohnB.,Jr.,&DavidRayGriffin.ProcessTheology:AnIntroductoryExposition. Louisville,KY:WestminsterJohnKnow,1976. Cobb,JohnB.,Jr. TwoTypesofPostmodernism:DeconstructionandProcess. Theology Today47,no.2(1990): Collins,JohnJ. ProcessHermeneutics:PromiseandProblems. Semeia24(1982): Cooper,JohnW.Panentheism:TheOtherGodofthePhilosophers.GrandRapids,MI:Baker Academic,2006. Fontinel,Eugene. ProcessTheology:APragmaticVersion. InReligiousExperienceand ProcessTheology:ThePastoralImplicationsofaMajorModernMovement,eds. HarryJamesCargas&BernardLee.NewYork,NY:Paulist,1976, Ford,LewisS. OurPrayersasGod spassions. InReligiousExperienceandProcess Theology:ThePastoralImplicationsofaMajorModernMovement,eds.HarryJames Cargas&BernardLee.NewYork,NY:Paulist,1976, TheLureofGod:ABiblicalBackgroundforProcessTheism.Philadelphia,PA: Fortress,1978. Gamwell,FranklinI. SpeakingofGodafterAquinas. JournalofReligion81,no.2(2001): Gnuse,RobertKarl. AProcessTheologicalInterpretationofthePrimevalHistoryin Genesis2 11. Horizons29,no.1(2002): Grenz,StanleyJ.,&RogerE.Olson.Twentieth centurytheology:godandtheworldina TransitionalAge.DownersGrove,IL:InterVarsity,1992. Hill,Jonathan.TheHistoryofChristianThought.DownersGrove,IL:InterVarsity,2003. Lindsey,F.Duane. AnEvangelicalOverviewofProcessTheology. BibliothecaSacra 134,no.533(1977): Livingstone,JamesC.,&FrancisSchlüsslerFiorenza.ModernChristianThought.Vol.2, TheTwentiethCentury,2 nd ed.minneapolis,ma:fortress,2006. Miller,Ed.L.,&StanleyJ.Grenz.FortressIntroductiontoContemporaryTheologies. Minneapolis,MN:Fortress,1998.
16 16 Nash,RonaldH. ProcessTheologyandClassicalTheism. InProcessTheology,ed. RonaldH.Nash.GrandRapids,MI:Baker,1987,3 29. Pinnock,ClarckH. BetweenClassicalandProcessTheism. InProcessTheology,ed. RonaldH.Nash.GrandRapids,MI:Baker,1987, Spitzer,Toba. TheBlessingofUncertainty. TheReconstructionist70,no.1(2005): Ware,BruceA. AnExpositionandCritiqueoftheProcessDoctrinesofDivineMutability andimmutability. WestminsterTheologicalJournal47(1985): Whitehead,AlfredNorth. ReligionandMetaphysics. InProcessPhilosophyand ChristianThought,eds.DelwinBrown,RalphE.James,Jr.,&GeneReeves. Indianapolis,IN;NewYork,NY:TheBobbs MerrillCompany,1971,67 9.
SAMPLE. Much of contemporary theology has moved away from classical. Contemporary Responses to Classical Theism GOD IN PROCESS THEOLOGY
3 Contemporary Responses to Classical Theism GOD IN PROCESS THEOLOGY Much of contemporary theology has moved away from classical theism as many theologians, regardless of their theological method or theological
More informationPredestination, Divine Foreknowledge, and Free Will
C H A P T E R 1 3 c Predestination, Divine Foreknowledge, and Free Will 1. Religious Belief and Free Will Debates about free will are impacted by religion as well as by science, as noted in chapter 1.
More informationA Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena
A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena 2017 by A Jacob W. Reinhardt, All Rights Reserved. Copyright holder grants permission to reduplicate article as long as it is not changed. Send further requests to
More informationMODELS CLARIFIED: RESPONDING TO LANGDON GILKEY. by David E. Klemm and William H. Klink
MODELS CLARIFIED: RESPONDING TO LANGDON GILKEY by David E. Klemm and William H. Klink Abstract. We respond to concerns raised by Langdon Gilkey. The discussion addresses the nature of theological thinking
More informationGod is a Community Part 1: God
God is a Community Part 1: God FATHER SON SPIRIT The Christian Concept of God Along with Judaism and Islam, Christianity is one of the great monotheistic world religions. These religions all believe that
More informationContemporary Theology II: From Theology of Hope to Postmodernism. Process Theology: Background and Concept. ST507 LESSON 14 of 24
Contemporary Theology II: From Theology of Hope to Postmodernism ST507 LESSON 14 of 24 John S. Feinberg, PhD University of Chicago, MA and PhD Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, ThM Talbot Theological
More informationPhil 2303 Intro to Worldviews Philosophy Department Dallas Baptist University Dr. David Naugle
Phil 2303 Intro to Worldviews Philosophy Department Dallas Baptist University Dr. David Naugle James Sire, The Universe Next Door: A Basic Worldview Catalog Chapter 9: The Vanished Horizon: Postmodernism
More informationSEMINAR ON NINETEENTH CENTURY THEOLOGY
SEMINAR ON NINETEENTH CENTURY THEOLOGY This year the nineteenth-century theology seminar sought to interrelate the historical and the systematic. The first session explored Johann Sebastian von Drey's
More informationPlantinga, Van Till, and McMullin. 1. What is the conflict Plantinga proposes to address in this essay? ( )
Plantinga, Van Till, and McMullin I. Plantinga s When Faith and Reason Clash (IDC, ch. 6) A. A Variety of Responses (133-118) 1. What is the conflict Plantinga proposes to address in this essay? (113-114)
More informationRESPONSE TO ANDREW K. GABRIEL, THE LORD IS THE SPIRIT: THE HOLY SPIRIT AND THE DIVINE ATTRIBUTES JEROMEY Q. MARTINI
RESPONSE TO ANDREW K. GABRIEL, THE LORD IS THE SPIRIT: THE HOLY SPIRIT AND THE DIVINE ATTRIBUTES JEROMEY Q. MARTINI In The Lord is the Spirit: The Holy Spirit and the Divine Attributes, Andrew Gabriel
More informationProcess Thought & Process Theism. By Fr. Charles Allen, Ph.D.
Process Thought & Process Theism By Fr. Charles Allen, Ph.D. What is process thought? It s a broad, mostly American philosophy of nature. It views the everyday world as fundamentally interactive, not inert
More informationContemporary Theology II: From Theology of Hope to Postmodernism. Process Theology: Assessment, Part 1. ST507 LESSON 16 of 24
Contemporary Theology II: From Theology of Hope to Postmodernism ST507 LESSON 16 of 24 John S. Feinberg, PhD University of Chicago, MA and PhD Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, ThM Talbot Theological
More informationAUSTIN GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY. BOOK REVIEW OF Great is the Lord: Theology for the Praise of God by Ron Highfield SYSTEMATIC CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE
AUSTIN GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY BOOK REVIEW OF Great is the Lord: Theology for the Praise of God by Ron Highfield SYSTEMATIC CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE THOMAS H. OLBRICHT, Ph.D. BY SERGIO N. LONGORIA AUSTIN,
More informationWho Is This God We Worship? Theology The Doctrine of God Genesis 1:1
Who Is This God We Worship? Theology The Doctrine of God Genesis 1:1 Who is this God we worship? God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth. (John 4:24) If recent surveys
More informationThe Challenge of God. Julia Grubich
The Challenge of God Julia Grubich Classical theism, refers to St. Thomas Aquinas de deo uno in the Summa Theologia, which is also known as the Doctrine of God. Over time there have been many people who
More informationA SCHOLARLY REVIEW OF JOHN H. WALTON S LECTURES AT ANDREWS UNIVERSITY ON THE LOST WORLD OF GENESIS ONE
Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1, 191-195. Copyright 2011 Andrews University Press. A SCHOLARLY REVIEW OF JOHN H. WALTON S LECTURES AT ANDREWS UNIVERSITY ON THE LOST WORLD OF GENESIS
More informationAnselmian Theism and Created Freedom: Response to Grant and Staley
Anselmian Theism and Created Freedom: Response to Grant and Staley Katherin A. Rogers University of Delaware I thank Grant and Staley for their comments, both kind and critical, on my book Anselm on Freedom.
More informationChristianity and Science. Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Must we choose? A Slick New Packaging of Creationism
and Science Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, is a documentary which looks at how scientists who have discussed or written about Intelligent Design (and along the way
More informationThe Ontological Argument
Running Head: THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1 The Ontological Argument By Andy Caldwell Salt Lake Community College Philosophy of Religion 2350 THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 2 Abstract This paper will reproduce,
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationThe Advancement: A Book Review
From the SelectedWorks of Gary E. Silvers Ph.D. 2014 The Advancement: A Book Review Gary E. Silvers, Ph.D. Available at: https://works.bepress.com/dr_gary_silvers/2/ The Advancement: Keeping the Faith
More informationUNDERGRADUATE STUDIES CERTIFICATE IN PHILOSOPHY (CERTIFICATES)
UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES GENERAL INFORMATION The Certificate in Philosophy is an independent undergraduate program comprising 24 credits, leading to a diploma, or undergraduate certificate, approved by the
More informationThe Paradox of the stone and two concepts of omnipotence
Filo Sofija Nr 30 (2015/3), s. 239-246 ISSN 1642-3267 Jacek Wojtysiak John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin The Paradox of the stone and two concepts of omnipotence Introduction The history of science
More informationContemporary Philosophy of Religion
Running Head 1 http//www.humanities-ebooks.co.uk Philosophy Insights General Editor: Mark Addis Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Steven Duncan If God is omniscient, He cannot plead ignorance Publication
More information12 Bible Course Map--2013
Course Title: Bible IV 12 Bible Course Map--2013 Duration: one year Frequency: one class period daily Year: 2013-2014 Text: 1. Teacher generated notes 2. The Universe Next Door by James W. Sire 3. The
More informationST 501 Method and Praxis in Theology
Asbury Theological Seminary eplace: preserving, learning, and creative exchange Syllabi ecommons 1-1-2009 ST 501 Method and Praxis in Theology Lawrence W. Wood Follow this and additional works at: http://place.asburyseminary.edu/syllabi
More informationThe Quality of Mercy is Not Strained: Justice and Mercy in Proslogion 9-11
The Quality of Mercy is Not Strained: Justice and Mercy in Proslogion 9-11 Michael Vendsel Tarrant County College Abstract: In Proslogion 9-11 Anselm discusses the relationship between mercy and justice.
More informationEUTHYPHRO, GOD S NATURE, AND THE QUESTION OF DIVINE ATTRIBUTES. An Analysis of the Very Complicated Doctrine of Divine Simplicity.
IIIM Magazine Online, Volume 4, Number 20, May 20 to May 26, 2002 EUTHYPHRO, GOD S NATURE, AND THE QUESTION OF DIVINE ATTRIBUTES An Analysis of the Very Complicated Doctrine of Divine Simplicity by Jules
More informationThe challenge for evangelical hermeneutics is the struggle to make the old, old
Goldsworthy, Graeme. Gospel-Centered Hermeneutics: Foundations and Principles of Evangelical Biblical Interpretation. Downer s Grove: IVP Academic, 2006. 341 pp. $29.00. The challenge for evangelical hermeneutics
More informationSAMPLE. Historically, pneumatology has had little influence on the. Introduction
1 Introduction What do we understand by the word God? What comes spontaneously to mind when we hear this term? Most likely the answer will be: Father. Or perhaps even more emphatically: the Super Father,
More informationA Framework for the Good
A Framework for the Good Kevin Kinghorn University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Introduction The broad goals of this book are twofold. First, the book offers an analysis of the good : the meaning
More informationWe Believe in God. Lesson Guide WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT GOD LESSON ONE. We Believe in God by Third Millennium Ministries
1 Lesson Guide LESSON ONE WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT GOD For videos, manuscripts, and other Lesson resources, 1: What We visit Know Third About Millennium God Ministries at thirdmill.org. 2 CONTENTS HOW TO USE
More informationProcess Theology: An Introductory Exposition By David Ray Griffin, John B. Cobb Jr.
Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition By David Ray Griffin, John B. Cobb Jr. Process Theology is an introductory exposition of the theological movement Download and Read Process Theology An Introductory
More informationHonours Programme in Philosophy
Honours Programme in Philosophy Honours Programme in Philosophy The Honours Programme in Philosophy is a special track of the Honours Bachelor s programme. It offers students a broad and in-depth introduction
More informationTHEISM AND BELIEF. Etymological note: deus = God in Latin; theos = God in Greek.
THEISM AND BELIEF Etymological note: deus = God in Latin; theos = God in Greek. A taxonomy of doxastic attitudes Belief: a mental state the content of which is taken as true or an assertion put forward
More informationBiblical Hermeneutics
Biblical Hermeneutics Modern and Post-Modern Models Models Post-Modern Modern and New Developments 1 2 New Methodology New Philosophies 3 4 New Discoveries New Realities A. New methodology rationalistic
More informationPositive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones
Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy Roger Bishop Jones Started: 3rd December 2011 Last Change Date: 2011/12/04 19:50:45 http://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/www/books/ppfd/ppfdpam.pdf Id: pamtop.tex,v
More informationHUME, CAUSATION AND TWO ARGUMENTS CONCERNING GOD
HUME, CAUSATION AND TWO ARGUMENTS CONCERNING GOD JASON MEGILL Carroll College Abstract. In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Hume (1779/1993) appeals to his account of causation (among other things)
More informationPositive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones
Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy Roger Bishop Jones June 5, 2012 www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/www/books/ppfd/ppfdbook.pdf c Roger Bishop Jones; Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Metaphysical Positivism 3
More informationTHEO 697 The Enlightenment and Modern Theology
THEO 697 The Enlightenment and Modern Theology John D. Morrison, PHD (434) 582-2185 jdmorrison@liberty.edu Winter Term, 2014 (Jan. 6-10) Office: Religion Hall, Room 128 Note: We will begin class each day
More informationUniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Recension of The Doctoral Dissertation of Mr. Piotr Józef Kubasiak In response to the convocation of the Dean of the Faculty of Catholic Theology at the University of Vienna, I present my opinion on the
More informationUnderstanding Our Mormon Neighbors
Understanding Our Mormon Neighbors Contributed by Don Closson Probe Ministries Mormon Neo-orthodoxy? Have you noticed that Mormons are sounding more and more like evangelical Christians? In the last few
More informationNATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE
NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE NATURALISM a philosophical view according to which philosophy is not a distinct mode of inquiry with its own problems and its own special body of (possible) knowledge philosophy
More informationContemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies
Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies ST503 LESSON 16 of 24 John S. Feinberg, Ph.D. Experience: Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. At
More informationFOLLOWING CHRIST IN THE WORLD
FOLLOWING CHRIST IN THE WORLD CHAPTER 1 Philosophy: Theology's handmaid 1. State the principle of non-contradiction 2. Simply stated, what was the fundamental philosophical position of Heraclitus? 3. Simply
More informationST 501 Method and Praxis in Theology
Asbury Theological Seminary eplace: preserving, learning, and creative exchange Syllabi ecommons 1-1-2002 ST 501 Method and Praxis in Theology Lawrence W. Wood Follow this and additional works at: http://place.asburyseminary.edu/syllabi
More informationTEILHARD DE CHARDIN: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL AND ORGANIC THEOLOGY
TEILHARD DE CHARDIN: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL AND ORGANIC THEOLOGY There is a new consciousness developing in our society and there are different efforts to describe it. I will mention three factors in this
More informationThis We Believe Awesome God
This We Believe Awesome God Statement 2 Statement of faith of the Evangelical Free Church of America We believe there is one God, Creator of all things, infinitely perfect and eternally existing in three
More informationCopan, P. and P. Moser, eds., The Rationality of Theism, London: Routledge, 2003, pp.xi+292
Copan, P. and P. Moser, eds., The Rationality of Theism, London: Routledge, 2003, pp.xi+292 The essays in this book are organised into three groups: Part I: Foundational Considerations Part II: Arguments
More informationThe Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will
Stance Volume 3 April 2010 The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will ABSTRACT: I examine Leibniz s version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason with respect to free will, paying particular attention
More informationTHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION AND ARISTOTELIAN THEOLOGY TODAY
Science and the Future of Mankind Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 99, Vatican City 2001 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv99/sv99-berti.pdf THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION
More informationWho was Jesus of Nazareth? 1. Introduction. Cautions about Expectations and Presuppositions of Jesus' Divinity and Humanity
Who was Jesus of Nazareth? 1. Introduction. Cautions about Expectations and Presuppositions of Jesus' Divinity and Humanity What is Christology? Jesus followers called him the Messiah Messiah = the anointed
More informationINVESTIGATING THE PRESUPPOSITIONAL REALM OF BIBLICAL-THEOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, PART II: CANALE ON REASON
Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 47, No. 2, 217-240. Copyright 2009 Andrews University Press. INVESTIGATING THE PRESUPPOSITIONAL REALM OF BIBLICAL-THEOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, PART II: CANALE ON REASON
More informationAnnotated Bibliography. seeking to keep the possibility of dualism alive in academic study. In this book,
Warren 1 Koby Warren PHIL 400 Dr. Alfino 10/30/2010 Annotated Bibliography Chalmers, David John. The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory.! New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Print.!
More informationThe Goodness of God in the Judaeo-Christian Tradition
The Goodness of God in the Judaeo-Christian Tradition (Please note: These are rough notes for a lecture, mostly taken from the relevant sections of Philosophy and Ethics and other publications and should
More informationTHE ROLE OF LANGUAGE IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL SYSTEM OF THOMAS HOBBES
STUDIES IN LOGIC, GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC 6(19) 2003 Katarzyna Doliwa University of Białystok THE ROLE OF LANGUAGE IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL SYSTEM OF THOMAS HOBBES Linguistic consideration understood by Thomas
More informationBECOMING A MORE CONFIDENT CHRISTIAN AND A MORE CONVINCING WITNESS SESSION 1 CHRISTIANITY OR SOMETHING ELSE?
BECOMING A MORE CONFIDENT CHRISTIAN AND A MORE CONVINCING WITNESS SESSION 1 CHRISTIANITY OR SOMETHING ELSE? Rich Knopp, Ph.D. Prof. of Philosophy & Christian Apologetics Director, WorldViewEyes Lincoln
More informationTHE PROBLEM WITH SOCIAL TRINITARIANISM: A REPLY TO WIERENGA
THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIAL TRINITARIANISM: A REPLY TO WIERENGA Jeffrey E. Brower In a recent article, Edward Wierenga defends a version of Social Trinitarianism according to which the Persons of the Trinity
More informationED601 APPLYING WORLDVIEW STUDIES TO CHRISTIAN EDUCATION
ED601 APPLYING WORLDVIEW STUDIES TO CHRISTIAN EDUCATION This sample unit outline is provided by CHC for prospective and current students to assist with unit selection. Elements of this outline which may
More informationAre Miracles Identifiable?
Are Miracles Identifiable? 1. Some naturalists argue that no matter how unusual an event is it cannot be identified as a miracle. 1. If this argument is valid, it has serious implications for those who
More informationIs Natural Theology A Form of Deism? By Dr. Robert A. Morey
Is Natural Theology A Form of Deism? By Dr. Robert A. Morey Deism is alive and well today not only in liberal Protestantism but also in neo- Evangelical circles. It comes in many different forms. But at
More informationReply to Kit Fine. Theodore Sider July 19, 2013
Reply to Kit Fine Theodore Sider July 19, 2013 Kit Fine s paper raises important and difficult issues about my approach to the metaphysics of fundamentality. In chapters 7 and 8 I examined certain subtle
More informationConditions of Fundamental Metaphysics: A critique of Jorge Gracia's proposal
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Critical Reflections Essays of Significance & Critical Reflections 2016 Mar 12th, 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM Conditions of Fundamental Metaphysics: A critique of Jorge
More informationBIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH. September 29m 2016
BIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH September 29m 2016 REFLECTIONS OF GOD IN SCIENCE God s wisdom is displayed in the marvelously contrived design of the universe and its parts. God s omnipotence
More informationA CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment
A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE A Paper Presented to Dr. Douglas Blount Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for PHREL 4313 by Billy Marsh October 20,
More informationTable of x III. Modern Modal Ontological Arguments Norman Malcolm s argument Charles Hartshorne s argument A fly in the ointment? 86
Table of Preface page xvii divinity I. God, god, and God 3 1. Existence and essence questions 3 2. Names in questions of existence and belief 4 3. Etymology and semantics 6 4. The core attitudinal conception
More informationProcess Thought and Bridge Building: A Response to Stephen K. White. Kevin Schilbrack
Archived version from NCDOCKS Institutional Repository http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/ Schilbrack, Kevin.2011 Process Thought and Bridge-Building: A Response to Stephen K. White, Process Studies 40:2 (Fall-Winter
More informationIntroduction. Getting started with world views.
Introduction Welcome to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Family Together. Last week we considered what Peer Discipleship was and why it is so helpful for us individually and corporately in growing
More informationST507: Contemporary Theology II: From Theology of Hope to Postmodernism
COURSE SYLLABUS ST507: Contemporary Theology II: From Theology of Hope to Postmodernism Course Lecturer: John S. Feinberg, Ph.D. Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity
More informationIs God Good By Definition?
1 Is God Good By Definition? by Graham Oppy As a matter of historical fact, most philosophers and theologians who have defended traditional theistic views have been moral realists. Some divine command
More informationUnit VI: Davidson and the interpretational approach to thought and language
Unit VI: Davidson and the interpretational approach to thought and language October 29, 2003 1 Davidson s interdependence thesis..................... 1 2 Davidson s arguments for interdependence................
More informationIHOPU Audit Course List
IHOPU Audit Course List Spring 2019 January 21 May 14 Available non-credit courses at IHOPU Audit enrollment is now open. Course locations are provided upon enrollment. All courses are taught at IHOPU
More informationBOOK REVIEWS AND NOTICES
ERIK J. WIELENBERG DePauw University Mark Murphy. God and Moral Law: On the Theistic Explanation of Morality. Oxford University Press, 2011. Suppose that God exists; what is the relationship between God
More informationRonald Dworkin, Religion without God, Harvard University Press, 2013, pp. 192, 16.50, ISBN
Ronald Dworkin, Religion without God, Harvard University Press, 2013, pp. 192, 16.50, ISBN 9780674726826 Simone Grigoletto, Università degli Studi di Padova In 2009, Thomas Nagel, to whom Dworkin s book
More information2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature
Introduction The philosophical controversy about free will and determinism is perennial. Like many perennial controversies, this one involves a tangle of distinct but closely related issues. Thus, the
More informationST504: History of Philosophy and Christian Thought. 3 hours Tuesdays: 1:00-3:55 pm
ST504: History of Philosophy and Christian Thought. 3 hours Tuesdays: 1:00-3:55 pm Contact Information Prof.: Bruce Baugus Office Phone: 601-923-1696 (x696) Office: Chapel Annex Email: bbaugus@rts.edu
More informationFAITH & REASON THE JOURNAL OF CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE
FAITH & REASON THE JOURNAL OF CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE Fall 1975 Vol. I No. 2 The Christology of Paul Tillich: A Critique Fr. Gerald L. Orbanek Christology is at the very heart of the faith. Ultimately we know
More informationBOOK REVIEW. Thomas R. Schreiner, Interpreting the Pauline Epistles (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2nd edn, 2011). xv pp. Pbk. US$13.78.
[JGRChJ 9 (2011 12) R12-R17] BOOK REVIEW Thomas R. Schreiner, Interpreting the Pauline Epistles (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2nd edn, 2011). xv + 166 pp. Pbk. US$13.78. Thomas Schreiner is Professor
More informationJohn Stuart Mill ( ) is widely regarded as the leading English-speaking philosopher of
[DRAFT: please do not cite without permission. The final version of this entry will appear in the Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Religion (Wiley-Blackwell, forthcoming), eds. Stewart Goetz and Charles
More informationIn the Beginning God
In the Beginning God It is either All Gods Word or not gods word at all! The very first sentence of the Bible is very precious to me. In my early quest to know God I listened to many Pastors, Teachers,
More informationAn Analysis of Freedom and Rational Egoism in Notes From Underground
An Analysis of Freedom and Rational Egoism in Notes From Underground Michael Hannon It seems to me that the whole of human life can be summed up in the one statement that man only exists for the purpose
More informationWorld without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.
Book reviews World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, by Michael C. Rea. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004, viii + 245 pp., $24.95. This is a splendid book. Its ideas are bold and
More informationSin in the Light of the Cross. M. Theodore Miglautsch
Sin in the Light of the Cross During the existence of humanity two events have been absolutely pivotal. First, the fall of man, when Adam and Eve deviated from the divine purpose. Second, the death of
More informationPHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION
PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION 1 year Master Track for Exploring a Discipline Requirements: BA in any academic discipline. If the student does not have a background in Philosophy or Theology, the student and
More informationTHE PROBLEM OF GOD Study Guide Questions
St udygui de THE PROBLEM OF GOD Study Guide Questions Introduction Questions: 1. The longer you re a Christian, the more you come to realize that faith requires skepticism. What have you recently been
More informationDarwin s Theologically Unsettling Ideas. John F. Haught Georgetown University
Darwin s Theologically Unsettling Ideas John F. Haught Georgetown University Everything in the life-world looks different after Darwin. Descent, diversity, design, death, suffering, sex, intelligence,
More informationPRACTICAL HERMENEUTICS: HOW TO INTERPRET YOUR BIBLE CORRECTLY (PART TWO)
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE P.O. Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Feature Article: DI501-2 PRACTICAL HERMENEUTICS: HOW TO INTERPRET YOUR BIBLE CORRECTLY (PART TWO) by Thomas A. Howe This article first appeared
More informationPhilosophy. Aim of the subject
Philosophy FIO Philosophy Philosophy is a humanistic subject with ramifications in all areas of human knowledge and activity, since it covers fundamental issues concerning the nature of reality, the possibility
More informationIntroduction to SUNY Series in Constructive Postmodern Thought 1
Introduction to SUNY Series in Constructive Postmodern Thought 1 The rapid spread of the term postmodern in recent years witnesses to a growing dissatisfaction with modernity and to an increasing sense
More information[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW
[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW Craig S. Keener, Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts (2 vols.; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011). xxxviii + 1172 pp. Hbk. US$59.99. Craig Keener
More informationOrigin Science versus Operation Science
Origin Science Origin Science versus Operation Science Recently Probe produced a DVD based small group curriculum entitled Redeeming Darwin: The Intelligent Design Controversy. It has been a great way
More information12. A Theistic Argument against Platonism (and in Support of Truthmakers and Divine Simplicity)
Dean W. Zimmerman / Oxford Studies in Metaphysics - Volume 2 12-Zimmerman-chap12 Page Proof page 357 19.10.2005 2:50pm 12. A Theistic Argument against Platonism (and in Support of Truthmakers and Divine
More informationWAR OF THE WORLDVIEWS #3. The Most Important Verse in the Bible
WAR OF THE WORLDVIEWS #3 The Most Important Verse in the Bible I. Welcome to the War of the Worldviews! A. What is a Worldview? 1. A worldview is simply how we see the world. A worldview is a set of beliefs
More informationTrinitarianism. Millard Erickson, Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 290. Copyright , Reclaiming the Mind Ministries.
Trinitarianism The doctrine of God is the central point for much of the rest of theology. One s view of God might even be thought of as supplying the whole framework within which one s theology is constructed,
More information42 Articles of the Essentials of a Christian World View
42 Articles of the Essentials of a Christian World View Articles of Affirmation and Denial and the Foundational Theology of The Coalition on Revival Dr. Jay Grimstead, D.Min., General Editor Mr. E. Calvin
More informationRussell on Plurality
Russell on Plurality Takashi Iida April 21, 2007 1 Russell s theory of quantification before On Denoting Russell s famous paper of 1905 On Denoting is a document which shows that he finally arrived at
More informationEmpty Names and Two-Valued Positive Free Logic
Empty Names and Two-Valued Positive Free Logic 1 Introduction Zahra Ahmadianhosseini In order to tackle the problem of handling empty names in logic, Andrew Bacon (2013) takes on an approach based on positive
More informationTHE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström
From: Who Owns Our Genes?, Proceedings of an international conference, October 1999, Tallin, Estonia, The Nordic Committee on Bioethics, 2000. THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström I shall be mainly
More informationFiorenza's Contribution to Theological Methodology
Philosophia Christi, 18:2, Fall, 1995 Fiorenza's Contribution to Theological Methodology Stephen M. Clinton The subject of theological methodology is currently in hot debate, among liberals and conservatives,
More information[MJTM 15 ( )] BOOK REVIEW
[MJTM 15 (2013 2014)] BOOK REVIEW Matthew Barrett and Ardel B. Caneday, eds. Four Views on the Historical Adam. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2013. 288 pp. Pbk. ISBN 0310499275. Four Views on the Historical
More information