Phil 108, August 10, 2010 Punishment

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Phil 108, August 10, 2010 Punishment"

Transcription

1 Phil 108, August 10, 2010 Punishment Retributivism and Utilitarianism The retributive theory: (1) It is good in itself that those who have acted wrongly should suffer. When this happens, people get what they deserve and justice is done. (2) A justification of punishment is that it realizes this good, by inflicting suffering on those who have acted wrongly (ie., by giving criminals what they deserve, by letting justice be done). Stronger versions of this thesis are: Realizing this good should not be sacrificed for any other social aim. ( Let justice be done though the heavens fall! ) For example, we should not impose more lenient punishments that might be more effective at reforming criminals. Realizing this good is the only justification of punishment. Bentham s utilitarian theory of punishment: The retributive theory is false. What is good in itself is just that there is more pleasure and less pain: that the sum total of pleasure less pain, taking everyone into account, is higher. Social policy should aim to realize this good: to maximize the sum of pleasure less pain. In itself, punishment is bad, period. The person punished feels pain, and his pain counts just as much as anyone else s in the sum total. Punishment can only be instrumentally good: good because it has good effects. For Bentham, these good effects are more pleasure and less pain. Punishment may have the good effect of preventing acts that would produce pain. Punishment prevents such acts by leading other people to expect that if they act in the same way, they will suffer pain just like the person punished. This expectation deters them from performing such acts. Punishment is justified only if its good effects principally, the pain that is avoided by deterring people from performing actions that would cause it outweigh its bad effects principally, the pain visited on the punished person. Attractions of the utilitarian theory of punishment: (1) Humane. Punishment at best a necessary evil. (2) Seems to explain many accepted exceptions and qualifications. According to Bentham, we should not punish when punishment is: (i) Groundless: where the act to be punished does not produce pain or foreclose pleasure. E.g., consensual acts. (ii) Inefficacious: where the punishment will not prevent the act. E.g., ex post facto or unannounced laws; children and the insane; unintentional actions, involuntary movements, duress. (iii) Unprofitable: where the punishment has worse effects than the acts it aims to prevent. (iv) Needless: where the punishment has worse effects than some other means of preventing the same acts.

2 How might the retributivist try to explain these exceptions and qualifications? One example: The insane should not be punished, because they do not deserve to be punished, because they are not responsible for what they do, because they do not act freely and intentionally. Notice while both the retributivist and the utilitarian appeal to the fact that the insane know not what they do to explain why they should not be punished, this facts plays altogether different roles in their respective explanations. (3) Seems to explain the proportionality of punishment: Why we should not impose, e.g., the death penalty for jaywalking. And it gives us a clear way to determine what the proportion is. Exercise: What is this way? How does utilitarianism determine what the proportion is? Question: The retributivist may be able to explain proportionality. But how can the retributivist determine what the proportion is? (See Ewing, p. 36ff.) (4) Avoids metaphysical worries: If determinism 1 is true, then we are we ever really responsible for what we do? 2 And if we are never really responsible for what we do, can we ever deserve anything? If punishment is justified only to give people what they deserve, and if people never deserve anything, then punishment is never justified. By contrast, if punishment is justified to deter people from bad actions, then punishment can be justified even if no one deserves anything. A problem with the utilitarian theory of punishment: Example: Framing an innocent man to prevent a riot. In general: Scapegoating, making an example of, etc., might lead to greater pleasure and less pain. How, on the utilitarian theory, does scapegoating differ from punishing a guilty person to deter others? In both cases, we are inflicting pain on one person in order to save others from greater pain, and according to the utilitarian, these facts about pleasure and pain are the only morally relevant facts. Fact about innocence, guilt, desert, justice, etc. are irrelevant. The retributive theory does not have this problem. There is no reason to punish an innocent man, since doing so does nothing to achieve justice: to give bad people the suffering they deserve. Moreover, if good people deserve not to suffer, then there is additional reason, besides the pain inflicted, not to punish the innocent man: it would be unjust. However, this last point also poses a problem for the retributivist. When we punish the guilty, don t we unjustly inflict suffering on his innocent family? (Ewing, p. 43) 1 The thesis that all events are causally determined by prior events. This means that our actions were ultimately causally determined by events that occurred before we were born and so over which we had no control. 2 See Ewing, pp for some suggestions on how the retributivist might just answer yes to this question.

3 Quinn: The right to punish from the right to threaten The basic question: Why doesn t punishment violate (or even infringe) the rights of the person punished? After all, taking someone s property, confining him against his will, etc. normally does violate his rights (or infringe them, in which case we owe compensation or apology). The same question arises in the case of self-defense, but it seems easier to answer: we defend ourselves to protect our rights. The problem is that when we punish someone for some violation of our rights, the punishment does not protect us from that violation. Objection to deterrence: It is not generally true that ordinary rights to liberty and life fail to apply because their application would stand in the way of some socially profitable use of people. Objection to forfeiture: Forfeiture is the idea that rights to life, liberty, and property are conditional, so that if one attempts to violate the rights of others, one forfeits them. But we don t think that people or society can violate the criminal s rights in ways independent of punishing him (e.g., locking up a burglar to prevent him from expressing his political views). So the idea of forfeiture comes to no more than the idea that the criminal s rights do not in fact stand in the way of his being punished. Objection to retribution: It is mysterious why it is just to inflict suffering for wrongdoing. And the main appeal of the view that punishment should be justified by the crime, not by further advantages can be captured by a new alternative. Quinn s approach: The traditional approach: The right to threaten punishment is justified by the right to punish. Quinn s approach: The right to punish is justified by the right to threaten punishment. To create a threat: (i) to create a risk that something bad will happen to someone if he does something and (ii) to inform him of (i) in circumstances in which this information may deter him from doing it. Self-protection: We have a right to create threats because we have a right to protect ourselves from violations of our rights. Like deterrence theory, punishment is justified by the aim of deterrence. But each act of punishment is not justified because it deters. Like retribution, the justification of punishment is backward-looking, for a particular crime. But the justification does not appeal to desert. Our right to protect ourselves from violations of our rights allow us to take several kinds of measures: (i) self-defense, (ii) barriers (e.g., locks, fences), (iii) automatic costs that precede or accompany the violation of some right,

4 (iv) confinement, as a last resort. Creating threats is an instance of (iii): [S]uppose our defender cannot arrange the spikes so that they offer a threat of injury to someone entering his territory but can arrange them so that they clearly offer threat of injury to an enemy leaving his territory after an attack. If he would have a right to do the former, doesn t he have a right to do the latter? M-punishment With a system of mechanical punishments or m-punishments, our only choice is whether to create the threat. There is no further choice, after we have created the threat, whether to follow through. The machines take care of that for us. Each instance of m-punishment is justified not because that punishment deters future crime. Instead, it is justified as the unavoidable by-product of the prior threat, which was justified because that threat deterred crime until now. Proportionality in m-punishment is explained by proportionality in self-protection. For example, we are not allowed to kill someone trying to pick our pocket. Still, the cost we threaten may be more serious than the violation of the right that the threat protects. The functional equivalence of punishment and m-punishment Every intuitively justified practice of punishment has as its counterpart a practice of m- punishment justified by the rights of self-protection, and vice versa, where they are counterparts if they threaten penalties of just the same severity for the same crimes. Since m-punishments may be more severe than the violations that they punish, one might worry that the system of m-punishment is at odds with our intuitions about proportionality. Reply: Intuitively, we allow that punishment may be more severe than the violations they punish. There are cases in which a violation of rights has occurred, but punishment seems unjustified. It is also unjustified to m-punish in these cases? Innocent third parties: M-punishment would also be ruled out. [N]o matter what the gain in protection, it is manifestly unjust to threaten to inflict an evil on someone when it is not up to him to do that which will prevent it. Incapacity to respond to reasons (e.g., compulsion, mental illness, non-culpable ignorance): It would be unjust to create dangers for them that they cannot escape or cannot have a reasonable chance of escaping. Does the right to threaten punishment justify the right to punish? Quinn aims to argue from: (1) the right to threaten m-punishment to (2) the right to threaten punishment to

5 (3) the right to punish The hard step is the one from (2) to (3). Can this be explained without presupposing the right to punish? Notice that this is the crucial difference between m-punishment and punishment. In the case of m-punishment, there is no question of the right to inflict m-punishment, because it is the machines that do that, not us. We only need to show that there is a right to threaten m- punishment. But in the case of punishment, we inflict the punishment. With what right? Quinn s explanation of the step from (2) to (3) is rather subtle and involved. So we won t try to follow all the twists and turns. Perhaps the most important feature of his explanation is that it focuses on the objections of the recipient of the punishment. From the recipient s perspective, there seems little difference between our creating the threat and our trying to carry it out. In both cases, some potential cost is attached to some conduct of his. So if he doesn t have an objection to the former, then why should he have an objection to the latter? Question: Is the recipient s objection to our being allowed to threaten or to punish the only objection that matters to whether we have a right to threaten or to punish? One might think that whether we have a right to do something depends on a balancing of the recipient s objection to our being allowed to do it to him and our objection to our being prohibited from doing it to him. And perhaps even if his objection to our being allowed to punish him is no stronger than his objection to our being allowed to threaten him, our objection to being prohibited from punishing him is weaker than our objection to our objection to being prohibited from threatening punishment. If we don t threaten, then our rights are put at risk. But what do we lose if we don t follow through on our threat? (Of course, we lose the ability to deter others by punishing him, but the right to punish him is not supposed to depend on that.) Quinn considers a related objection: that his theory faces a problem similar to the toxin puzzle. In the puzzle, one has reason to intend to drink the toxin, but no reason, when the time comes, to drink it. Once one realizes this, one cannot rationally intend to drink it. Why isn t it the same with punishment? We have reason to intend to punish, but no reason, when the time comes, to punish. So we cannot rationally intend to punish, which threatening to punish involves. Quinn concedes that our reason, when the time comes, to punish cannot be to deter the crime that we are punishing. Still, we can have other reasons to punish: to mete out retribution, to deter others, to express our condemnation, or simply to fulfill our contractual obligations. Crucially, these reasons do not justify our right to punish. But they are reasons that we can expect to have, and so they can enable us to intend in advance to punish.

CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2

CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2 CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2 1 THE ISSUES: REVIEW Is the death penalty (capital punishment) justifiable in principle? Why or why not? Is the death penalty justifiable

More information

INNOCENCE LOST: A PROBLEM FOR PUNISHMENT AS DUTY

INNOCENCE LOST: A PROBLEM FOR PUNISHMENT AS DUTY Law and Philosophy (2017) 36: 225 254 Ó The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com DOI 10.1007/s10982-017-9288-2 INNOCENCE LOST: A PROBLEM FOR PUNISHMENT AS DUTY

More information

The University of Chicago Press

The University of Chicago Press The University of Chicago Press http://www.jstor.org/stable/2380998. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

More information

Blame and Forfeiture. The central issue that a theory of punishment must address is why we are we permitted to

Blame and Forfeiture. The central issue that a theory of punishment must address is why we are we permitted to Andy Engen Blame and Forfeiture The central issue that a theory of punishment must address is why we are we permitted to treat criminals in ways that would normally be impermissible, denying them of goods

More information

A Defense of the Public Health-Quarantine. Model of Punishment in Light of. Obligations of the State to the Wrongdoer

A Defense of the Public Health-Quarantine. Model of Punishment in Light of. Obligations of the State to the Wrongdoer A Defense of the Public Health-Quarantine Model of Punishment in Light of Obligations of the State to the Wrongdoer by Eric Nicholas Bohner A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment

More information

RESPONSE TO ADAM KOLBER S PUNISHMENT AND MORAL RISK

RESPONSE TO ADAM KOLBER S PUNISHMENT AND MORAL RISK RESPONSE TO ADAM KOLBER S PUNISHMENT AND MORAL RISK Chelsea Rosenthal* I. INTRODUCTION Adam Kolber argues in Punishment and Moral Risk that retributivists may be unable to justify criminal punishment,

More information

Ethical Theory. Ethical Theory. Consequentialism in practice. How do we get the numbers? Must Choose Best Possible Act

Ethical Theory. Ethical Theory. Consequentialism in practice. How do we get the numbers? Must Choose Best Possible Act Consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism Ethical Theory Utilitarianism (Consequentialism) in Practice Criticisms of Consequentialism Kant Consequentialism The only thing that determines the morality of

More information

Liability and the Limits of Self-Defense

Liability and the Limits of Self-Defense McMahan run04.tex V1 - February 5, 2009 3:20pm Page 155 4 Liability and the Limits of Self-Defense 4.1 DIFFERENT TYPES OF THREAT 4.1.1 The Relevance of Excuses to Killing in Self-Defense By fighting in

More information

DEFENDING PUNISHMENT REPLIES TO CRITICS SYMPOSIUM THE PHILOSOPHY OF PUNISHMENT THOM BROOKS

DEFENDING PUNISHMENT REPLIES TO CRITICS SYMPOSIUM THE PHILOSOPHY OF PUNISHMENT THOM BROOKS SYMPOSIUM THE PHILOSOPHY OF PUNISHMENT DEFENDING PUNISHMENT REPLIES TO CRITICS BY THOM BROOKS 2015 Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series), Vol. 5, No. 1 (2015): 73-94 Luiss University Press E-ISSN 2240-7987

More information

Consequentialism, Incoherence and Choice. Rejoinder to a Rejoinder.

Consequentialism, Incoherence and Choice. Rejoinder to a Rejoinder. 1 Consequentialism, Incoherence and Choice. Rejoinder to a Rejoinder. by Peter Simpson and Robert McKim In a number of books and essays Joseph Boyle, John Finnis, and Germain Grisez (hereafter BFG) have

More information

The Philosophy of Ethics as It Relates to Capital Punishment. Nicole Warkoski, Lynchburg College

The Philosophy of Ethics as It Relates to Capital Punishment. Nicole Warkoski, Lynchburg College Warkoski: The Philosophy of Ethics as It Relates to Capital Punishment Warkoski 1 The Philosophy of Ethics as It Relates to Capital Punishment Nicole Warkoski, Lynchburg College The study of ethics as

More information

Derk Pereboom s Living Without Free Will (2001)

Derk Pereboom s Living Without Free Will (2001) Article Theme: Author Meets Critics Free Will Skepticism and Obligation Skepticism: Comments on Derk Pereboom s Free Will Agency, and Meaning in Life Dana Kay Nelkin Email: dnelkin@ucsd.edu I. Introduction

More information

Louisiana Law Review. Cheney C. Joseph Jr. Louisiana State University Law Center. Volume 35 Number 5 Special Issue Repository Citation

Louisiana Law Review. Cheney C. Joseph Jr. Louisiana State University Law Center. Volume 35 Number 5 Special Issue Repository Citation Louisiana Law Review Volume 35 Number 5 Special Issue 1975 ON GUILT, RESPONSIBILITY AND PUNISHMENT. By Alf Ross. Translated from Danish by Alastair Hannay and Thomas E. Sheahan. London, Stevens and Sons

More information

Compatibilist Objections to Prepunishment

Compatibilist Objections to Prepunishment Florida Philosophical Review Volume X, Issue 1, Summer 2010 7 Compatibilist Objections to Prepunishment Winner of the Outstanding Graduate Paper Award at the 55 th Annual Meeting of the Florida Philosophical

More information

Evolving Standards of Decency: The Intersection of Death Penalty Theory and Supreme Court Jurisprudence

Evolving Standards of Decency: The Intersection of Death Penalty Theory and Supreme Court Jurisprudence The College of Wooster Libraries Open Works Senior Independent Study Theses 2016 Evolving Standards of Decency: The Intersection of Death Penalty Theory and Supreme Court Jurisprudence Rachel S. Sullivan

More information

MILL ON JUSTICE: CHAPTER 5 of UTILITARIANISM Lecture Notes Dick Arneson Philosophy 13 Fall, 2005

MILL ON JUSTICE: CHAPTER 5 of UTILITARIANISM Lecture Notes Dick Arneson Philosophy 13 Fall, 2005 1 MILL ON JUSTICE: CHAPTER 5 of UTILITARIANISM Lecture Notes Dick Arneson Philosophy 13 Fall, 2005 Some people hold that utilitarianism is incompatible with justice and objectionable for that reason. Utilitarianism

More information

THE DOOMSDAY MACHINE: PROPORTIONALITY, PUNISHMENT AND PREVENTION

THE DOOMSDAY MACHINE: PROPORTIONALITY, PUNISHMENT AND PREVENTION THE DOOMSDAY MACHINE: PROPORTIONALITY, PUNISHMENT AND PREVENTION 1. Introduction Much of the philosophical discussion of punishment has focused on its justification. Consequentialists argue that punishment

More information

If Everyone Does It, Then You Can Too Charlie Melman

If Everyone Does It, Then You Can Too Charlie Melman 27 If Everyone Does It, Then You Can Too Charlie Melman Abstract: I argue that the But Everyone Does That (BEDT) defense can have significant exculpatory force in a legal sense, but not a moral sense.

More information

Phil 108, July 15, 2010

Phil 108, July 15, 2010 Phil 108, July 15, 2010 Foot on intending vs. foreseeing and doing vs. allowing: Two kinds of effects an action can have: What the agent merely foresees will happen because of his action. What the agent

More information

McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism

McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism 48 McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism T om R egan In his book, Meta-Ethics and Normative Ethics,* Professor H. J. McCloskey sets forth an argument which he thinks shows that we know,

More information

Proportionality in Defensive Harm * Jonathan Quong. January 26, advancing toward you with very clear intent to do you physical harm.

Proportionality in Defensive Harm * Jonathan Quong. January 26, advancing toward you with very clear intent to do you physical harm. 1 Proportionality in Defensive Harm * Jonathan Quong January 26, 2014 Albert is angry with you because you won t go out on a date with him, and now he s advancing toward you with very clear intent to do

More information

MILL. The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness.

MILL. The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. MILL The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. Mill s principle of utility [A]ctions are right in proportion as they tend to

More information

Gertrude Ezorsky. The Ethics of Punishment State University of New York Press, Albany

Gertrude Ezorsky. The Ethics of Punishment State University of New York Press, Albany Gertrude Ezorsky The Ethics of Punishment Punishment, writes McTaggart, is pain and to inflict pain on any person obviously needs justification. But if the need to justify punishment is obvious, the manner

More information

RMPS Assignment. National 5/Higher. Name: Class: Teacher: My Question:

RMPS Assignment. National 5/Higher. Name: Class: Teacher: My Question: RMPS Assignment National 5/Higher Name: Class: Teacher: My Question: The Assignment The National 5 Assignment is out of 20 marks. This is 25% of your overall grade. The Higher Assignment is out of 30 marks

More information

THE BASIS OF MORAL LIABILITY TO DEFENSIVE KILLING. Jeff McMahan Rutgers University

THE BASIS OF MORAL LIABILITY TO DEFENSIVE KILLING. Jeff McMahan Rutgers University Philosophical Issues, 15, Normativity, 2005 THE BASIS OF MORAL LIABILITY TO DEFENSIVE KILLING Jeff McMahan Rutgers University There may be circumstances in which it is morally justifiable intentionally

More information

Retributivism, Agency, and the Voluntary Act Requirement

Retributivism, Agency, and the Voluntary Act Requirement Pace Law Review Volume 36 Issue 3 Spring 2016 Article 1 May 2016 Retributivism, Agency, and the Voluntary Act Requirement Christopher P. Taggart Harvard Law School Follow this and additional works at:

More information

Resolved: Connecticut should eliminate the death penalty.

Resolved: Connecticut should eliminate the death penalty. A Coach s Notes 1 Everett Rutan Xavier High School everett.rutan@moodys.com or ejrutan3@acm.org Connecticut Debate Association AITE October 15, 2011 Resolved: Connecticut should eliminate the death penalty.

More information

Multilateral Retributivism: Justifying Change Richard R. Eva

Multilateral Retributivism: Justifying Change Richard R. Eva 65 Multilateral Retributivism: Justifying Change Richard R. Eva Abstract: In this paper I argue for a theory of punishment I call Multilateral Retributivism. Typically retributive notions of justice are

More information

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 5 points).

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 5 points). HU2700 Spring 2008 Midterm Exam Answer Key There are two sections: a short answer section worth 25 points and an essay section worth 75 points. No materials (books, notes, outlines, fellow classmates,

More information

Summary of Locke's Second Treatise [T2]

Summary of Locke's Second Treatise [T2] Summary of Locke's Second Treatise [T2] I. Introduction "Political power" is defined as the right to make laws and to enforce them with penalties of increasing severity including death. The purpose of

More information

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 4 points).

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 4 points). Humanities 2702 Fall 2007 Midterm Exam There are two sections: a short answer section worth 24 points and an essay section worth 75 points you get one point for writing your name! No materials (books,

More information

Those of us who oppose torture, and who are acutely conscious of the grave

Those of us who oppose torture, and who are acutely conscious of the grave Public Affairs Quarterly Volume 22, Number 2, April 2008 TORTURE IN PRINCIPLE AND IN PRACTICE Jeff McMahan 1. Against Moral Absolutism Those of us who oppose torture, and who are acutely conscious of the

More information

PHIL 202: IV:

PHIL 202: IV: Draft of 3-6- 13 PHIL 202: Core Ethics; Winter 2013 Core Sequence in the History of Ethics, 2011-2013 IV: 19 th and 20 th Century Moral Philosophy David O. Brink Handout #9: W.D. Ross Like other members

More information

Kant s Justification of the Death Penalty Reconsidered

Kant s Justification of the Death Penalty Reconsidered Kant s Justification of the Death Penalty Reconsidered Benjamin S. Yost Providence College, Providence, RI Introduction It is hard to know what to think about Kant s passionate sermons on capital punishment.

More information

Apostasy and Conversion Kishan Manocha

Apostasy and Conversion Kishan Manocha Apostasy and Conversion Kishan Manocha In the context of a conference which tries to identify how the international community can strengthen its ability to protect religious freedom and, in particular,

More information

Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons

Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons Some Possibly Helpful Terminology Normative moral theories can be categorized according to whether the theory is primarily focused on judgments of value or judgments

More information

A Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism

A Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism A Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism Abstract Saul Smilansky s theory of free will and moral responsibility consists of two parts; dualism and illusionism. Dualism is

More information

Killing Innocent People

Killing Innocent People Killing Innocent People 1 Introduction Suppose that a soldier is fighting in a war that is just. His unit is about to be attacked by child soldiers who he knows were earlier forcibly abducted from their

More information

Proportionality in Defensive Harm * Jonathan Quong. April 12, Albert is angry with you because you won t go out on a date with him, and now he s

Proportionality in Defensive Harm * Jonathan Quong. April 12, Albert is angry with you because you won t go out on a date with him, and now he s 1 Proportionality in Defensive Harm * Jonathan Quong April 12, 2013 Albert is angry with you because you won t go out on a date with him, and now he s advancing toward you with very clear intent to do

More information

The Moral Permissibility of Punishment

The Moral Permissibility of Punishment Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) January 2011 The Moral Permissibility of Punishment Zachary Hoskins Washington University in

More information

Phil 114, February 29, 2012 Sir Robert Filmer, Observations Concerning the Originall of Government

Phil 114, February 29, 2012 Sir Robert Filmer, Observations Concerning the Originall of Government Phil 114, February 29, 2012 Sir Robert Filmer, Observations Concerning the Originall of Government, p. 234 (bspace) John Locke, First Treatise of Government, Ch. 4 41 43 (review), Ch. 9 84 103 (review)

More information

Utilitarianism pp

Utilitarianism pp Utilitarianism pp. 430-445. Assuming that moral realism is true and that there are objectively true moral principles, what are they? What, for example, is the correct principle concerning lying? Three

More information

R. M. Hare (1919 ) SINNOTT- ARMSTRONG. Definition of moral judgments. Prescriptivism

R. M. Hare (1919 ) SINNOTT- ARMSTRONG. Definition of moral judgments. Prescriptivism 25 R. M. Hare (1919 ) WALTER SINNOTT- ARMSTRONG Richard Mervyn Hare has written on a wide variety of topics, from Plato to the philosophy of language, religion, and education, as well as on applied ethics,

More information

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus Class #27 - Finishing Consequentialism Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 Business P Final papers are due on Thursday P Final

More information

AQA GCSE Theme E - Crime and Punishment (Quiz 3)

AQA GCSE Theme E - Crime and Punishment (Quiz 3) Q GS Theme - rime and Punishment (Quiz 3) Score: 1. "With that, one of Jesus' companions reached for his sword, drew it out and struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his ear" - Matthew 26:51

More information

client, someone no less capable would do so. It is morally wrong for such attorneys to

client, someone no less capable would do so. It is morally wrong for such attorneys to 1 Replaceable lawyers and guilty defendants (forthcoming in The Journal of Moral Philosophy; this is the penultimate draft) Abstract: Many criminal lawyers should expect that, were they to not defend a

More information

Ariddle in the ethics of war concerns whether lethal defensive force may

Ariddle in the ethics of war concerns whether lethal defensive force may Killing Soldiers Gerhard Øverland* Ariddle in the ethics of war concerns whether lethal defensive force may be justifiably used against aggressing soldiers who are morally innocent. In this essay I argue

More information

Bernard Hoose - Proportionalism

Bernard Hoose - Proportionalism Bernard Hoose - Proportionalism Section 1 Proportionalism: Background Proportionalism originated among Catholic scholars in Europe and America in the 1960 s. One influential commentator of Proportionalism

More information

Punishment and the Arsenault Case

Punishment and the Arsenault Case Punishment and the Arsenault Case Albert Atkin Sheffield University, UK Introduction If we talk about punishment in a legal sense, it would seem to that to be clear about what we are doing we ought to

More information

Social Contracts, Fair Play, and the Justification of Punishment

Social Contracts, Fair Play, and the Justification of Punishment Social Contracts, Fair Play, and the Justification of Punishment Richard Dagger* In recent years, the counterintuitive claim that criminals consent to their own punishment has been revived by philosophers

More information

1 Ted Kirnbauer Romans 3: /19/17

1 Ted Kirnbauer Romans 3: /19/17 1 II. SALVATION THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD REVEALED (3:21 8:39) How does God save sinners? In Romans 1:18 3:20 Paul has proven that all men are guilty before God and are therefore under condemnation. There

More information

CHAP. II. Of the State of Nature.

CHAP. II. Of the State of Nature. Excerpts from John Locke, Of Civil Government CHAP. II. Of the State of Nature. Sec. 4. TO understand political power right, and derive it from its original, we must consider, what state all men are naturally

More information

IS GOD "SIGNIFICANTLY FREE?''

IS GOD SIGNIFICANTLY FREE?'' IS GOD "SIGNIFICANTLY FREE?'' Wesley Morriston In an impressive series of books and articles, Alvin Plantinga has developed challenging new versions of two much discussed pieces of philosophical theology:

More information

The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ethics.

The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ethics. The Rights Forfeiture Theory of Punishment Author(s): Christopher Heath Wellman Reviewed work(s): Source: Ethics, Vol. 122, No. 2 (January 2012), pp. 371-393 Published by: The University of Chicago Press

More information

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Law Reviews 3-1-2007 Introduction Robin Bradley Kar

More information

This handout follows the handout on Determinism. You should read that handout first.

This handout follows the handout on Determinism. You should read that handout first. Michael Lacewing Compatibilism This handout follows the handout on Determinism. You should read that handout first. COMPATIBILISM I: VOLUNTARY ACTION AS DEFINED IN TERMS OF THE TYPE OF CAUSE FROM WHICH

More information

Beyond Minority Report: Pre-crime, Pre-punishment and Pre-desert

Beyond Minority Report: Pre-crime, Pre-punishment and Pre-desert Beyond Minority Report: Pre-crime, Pre-punishment and Pre-desert 1. Introduction Utilitarian ethics are apparently incommensurable with other ethical perspectives. Faced with a choice between maximizing

More information

A Contractualist Reply

A Contractualist Reply A Contractualist Reply The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Scanlon, T. M. 2008. A Contractualist Reply.

More information

PACIFISM AND MORAL THEORY

PACIFISM AND MORAL THEORY Diametros 23 (March 2010): 44-68 PACIFISM AND MORAL THEORY - Jeff McMahan - I. INTRODUCTION Pacifism is used to refer to a variety of different doctrines concerning violence and war. It can refer to the

More information

1 Ted Kirnbauer Galatians 2: /25/14

1 Ted Kirnbauer Galatians 2: /25/14 1 2:15 We are Jews by nature and not sinners from among the Gentiles; 2:16 nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed

More information

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. Citation: 21 Isr. L. Rev. 113 1986 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Sun Jan 11 12:34:09 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's

More information

The Quality of Mercy is Not Strained: Justice and Mercy in Proslogion 9-11

The Quality of Mercy is Not Strained: Justice and Mercy in Proslogion 9-11 The Quality of Mercy is Not Strained: Justice and Mercy in Proslogion 9-11 Michael Vendsel Tarrant County College Abstract: In Proslogion 9-11 Anselm discusses the relationship between mercy and justice.

More information

Carritt, E. F. Anthony Skelton

Carritt, E. F. Anthony Skelton 1 Carritt, E. F. Anthony Skelton E. F. Carritt (1876 1964) was born in London, England. He studied at the University of Oxford, at Hertford College, and received a first class degree in Greats in 1898.

More information

PART IV ON HUMAN DOINGS: LIFE IN THE COSMO

PART IV ON HUMAN DOINGS: LIFE IN THE COSMO PART IV ON HUMAN DOINGS: LIFE IN THE COSMO NATURAL INCLINATION AS A BASIS FOR NATURAL LAW PETER KARL KORITANSKY Toward the end of his long account of human sin and its effects, Thomas Aquinas makes an

More information

George Washington Carver Engineering and Science High School 2018 Summer Enrichment

George Washington Carver Engineering and Science High School 2018 Summer Enrichment George Washington Carver Engineering and Science High School 2018 Summer Enrichment Due Wednesday September 5th AP GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS In addition to the Declaration of Independence and Constitution

More information

Comment on Robert Audi, Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State

Comment on Robert Audi, Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State Weithman 1. Comment on Robert Audi, Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State Among the tasks of liberal democratic theory are the identification and defense of political principles that

More information

A Role for Expression in Retributive Theories of Punishment. Clair Morrissey

A Role for Expression in Retributive Theories of Punishment. Clair Morrissey A Role for Expression in Retributive Theories of Punishment Clair Morrissey A thesis submitted to the faculty of the Univeristy of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements

More information

Reservations About Retribution in Secular Society

Reservations About Retribution in Secular Society BYU Law Review Volume 2003 Issue 3 Article 6 9-1-2003 Reservations About Retribution in Secular Society Steven F. Huefner Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview

More information

Quinn s DDE. 1. Quinn s DDE: Warren Quinn begins by running through the familiar pairs of cases:

Quinn s DDE. 1. Quinn s DDE: Warren Quinn begins by running through the familiar pairs of cases: Quinn s DDE 1. Quinn s DDE: Warren Quinn begins by running through the familiar pairs of cases: Strategic Bomber vs. Terror Bomber Direction of Resources vs. Guinea Pigs Hysterectomy vs. Craniotomy What

More information

Retribution and Restitution in Locke s Theory of Punishment

Retribution and Restitution in Locke s Theory of Punishment Political Science Publications Political Science 2010 Retribution and Restitution in Locke s Theory of Punishment Alex Tuckness Iowa State University, tuckness@iastate.edu Follow this and additional works

More information

Phil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority

Phil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority Phil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority The aims of On Liberty The subject of the work is the nature and limits of the power which

More information

Crime and Punishment

Crime and Punishment Crime and Punishment Write down the meaning of these keywords Sin An act against the will of God Crime An action against the criminal law Reform Using punishment to help people not to offend again and

More information

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule UTILITARIAN ETHICS Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule A dilemma You are a lawyer. You have a client who is an old lady who owns a big house. She tells you that

More information

ON GOD, SUFFERING, AND THEODICAL INDIVIDUALISM

ON GOD, SUFFERING, AND THEODICAL INDIVIDUALISM 187 ON GOD, SUFFERING, AND THEODICAL INDIVIDUALISM JEROME GELLMAN Ben Gurion University of the Negev Recently, Stephen Maitzen has provided an argument for the nonexistence of God based on ordinary morality.

More information

The Non-Identity Problem from Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit (1984)

The Non-Identity Problem from Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit (1984) The Non-Identity Problem from Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit (1984) Each of us might never have existed. What would have made this true? The answer produces a problem that most of us overlook. One

More information

Agreat trouble for lovers of Socrates is the fact that one of the

Agreat trouble for lovers of Socrates is the fact that one of the Aporia Vol. 15 number 1 2005 Obedience to the State in the Crito and the Apology KYLE DINGMAN Agreat trouble for lovers of Socrates is the fact that one of the central claims espoused in the Crito the

More information

Socratic and Platonic Ethics

Socratic and Platonic Ethics Socratic and Platonic Ethics G. J. Mattey Winter, 2017 / Philosophy 1 Ethics and Political Philosophy The first part of the course is a brief survey of important texts in the history of ethics and political

More information

Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000)

Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000) Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000) One of the advantages traditionally claimed for direct realist theories of perception over indirect realist theories is that the

More information

Do we have reasons to obey the law?

Do we have reasons to obey the law? Do we have reasons to obey the law? Edmund Tweedy Flanigan Abstract Instead of the question, Do we have an obligation to obey the law? we should first ask the easier question, Do we have reasons to obey

More information

The Charges Against Socrates

The Charges Against Socrates Plato, Apology The Charges Against Socrates 2 sets of accusers: 1. The old accusers 2. More recent accusers (formal charges) The Charges from the Old Accusers 1. Socrates busies himself studying things

More information

Walter Terence Stace. Soft Determinism

Walter Terence Stace. Soft Determinism Walter Terence Stace Soft Determinism 1 Compatibilism and soft determinism Stace is not perhaps as convinced as d Holbach that determinism is true. (But that s not what makes him a compatibilist.) The

More information

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? - My boss - The shareholders - Other stakeholders - Basic principles about conduct and its impacts - What is good for me - What

More information

WAR AND SELF-DEFENCE: A CRITIQUE AND A PROPOSAL

WAR AND SELF-DEFENCE: A CRITIQUE AND A PROPOSAL Diametros 23 (March 2010): 69-83 WAR AND SELF-DEFENCE: A CRITIQUE AND A PROPOSAL - Phillip Montague - A view commonly assumed to be true in discussions of the ethics of war is that the principles in virtue

More information

The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy from Robert Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism (1970)

The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy from Robert Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism (1970) The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy from Robert Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism (1970) 1. The Concept of Authority Politics is the exercise of the power of the state, or the attempt to influence

More information

On the Concept of a Morally Relevant Harm

On the Concept of a Morally Relevant Harm University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Philosophy Faculty Publications Philosophy 12-2008 On the Concept of a Morally Relevant Harm David Lefkowitz University of Richmond, dlefkowi@richmond.edu

More information

Moralising liberty. 1 Introduction. Ralf M. Bader Merton College, University of Oxford

Moralising liberty. 1 Introduction. Ralf M. Bader Merton College, University of Oxford Moralising liberty Ralf M. Bader Merton College, University of Oxford 1 Introduction There are some things we have a right to do. 1 These things we are free to do. There are other things that we do not

More information

Romans 13: Stanly Community Church

Romans 13: Stanly Community Church Serving God includes submitting to human government. As Christians represent the Lord s kingdom on earth, it is our duty to respect and obey our earthly leaders. The Sovereign Ruler of the universe has

More information

Proofs of Non-existence

Proofs of Non-existence The Problem of Evil Proofs of Non-existence Proofs of non-existence are strange; strange enough in fact that some have claimed that they cannot be done. One problem is with even stating non-existence claims:

More information

Autonomous Machines Are Ethical

Autonomous Machines Are Ethical Autonomous Machines Are Ethical John Hooker Carnegie Mellon University INFORMS 2017 1 Thesis Concepts of deontological ethics are ready-made for the age of AI. Philosophical concept of autonomy applies

More information

FALL2010: PHI7550 FINAL EXAM PART III

FALL2010: PHI7550 FINAL EXAM PART III FALL2010: PHI7550 FINAL EXAM PART III POJMAN S THREE RESPONSES TO DEATH PENALTY OBJECTIONS Leonard O Goenaga SEBTS, PHI7550 Critical Thinking and Argumentation Dr. Jeremy Evans Goenaga 2 QUESTION 3: Present

More information

TITLE: Jesus Christ Paid The Full Punishment Ransom For Those Who Believe

TITLE: Jesus Christ Paid The Full Punishment Ransom For Those Who Believe Sermon or Lesson: Romans 3:24-25a (NIV based) [Lesson Questions included] TITLE: Jesus Christ Paid The Full Punishment Ransom For Those Who Believe [Note: This sermon-or-lesson may be too long to present

More information

Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), pp Reprinted in Moral Luck (CUP, 1981).

Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), pp Reprinted in Moral Luck (CUP, 1981). Draft of 3-21- 13 PHIL 202: Core Ethics; Winter 2013 Core Sequence in the History of Ethics, 2011-2013 IV: 19 th and 20 th Century Moral Philosophy David O. Brink Handout #14: Williams, Internalism, and

More information

TOPIC 27: MORALITY OF HUMAN ACTS

TOPIC 27: MORALITY OF HUMAN ACTS TOPIC 27: MORALITY OF HUMAN ACTS 1. The Morality of Human Acts Human acts, that is, acts that are freely chosen in consequence of a judgment of conscience, can be morally evaluated. They are either good

More information

Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies

Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment

More information

Responsibility and the Value of Choice

Responsibility and the Value of Choice Responsibility and the Value of Choice The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Published Version Accessed Citable

More information

Honors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions

Honors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions Cabrillo College Claudia Close Honors Ethics Philosophy 10H Fall 2018 Honors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions Your initial presentation should be approximately 6-7 minutes and you should prepare

More information

Chapter II. Of the State of Nature

Chapter II. Of the State of Nature Second Treatise on Government - by John Locke(1690) Chapter II Of the State of Nature 4. To understand political power aright, and derive it from its original, we must consider what estate all men are

More information

The Public Health-Quarantine Model Gregg D. Caruso

The Public Health-Quarantine Model Gregg D. Caruso The Public Health-Quarantine Model Gregg D. Caruso Penultimate Draft Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility, eds. Dana Nelkin and Derk Pereboom New York: Oxford University Press (estimated 2018) One of

More information

The Ethics of Punishment

The Ethics of Punishment The Ethics of Punishment Lectures in Applied Ethics Lawrence M. Hinman Emeritus Professor of Philosophy University of San Diego Last updated: 8/19/16 Introduction For years, we heard calls to get tough

More information

Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants. Citation Journal Of Ethics, 2012, v. 16 n. 4, p

Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants. Citation Journal Of Ethics, 2012, v. 16 n. 4, p Title Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants Author(s) Steinhoff, U Citation Journal Of Ethics, 2012, v. 16 n. 4, p. 339-366 Issued Date 2012 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10722/147109 Rights

More information