New Chapter: Philosophy of Religion
|
|
- Esther Jordan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 6: 1-25 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Dennett, Show Me the Science b. Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (10) c. Mackie, Free Will and the Problem of Evil 2. Next Week a. Pascal, Pensées : Notes on Religion and Other Subjects b. Saka, Pascal s Wager About God c. James, The Will to Believe A. Down the road a bit: 3. First Papers Due: In class, Tuesday 2/6 4. Midterm Exam: in class, Thursday 3/1 New Chapter: Philosophy of Religion I. Some Preliminaries II. The Cosmological Argument III. The Ontological Argument IV. The Teleological Argument (Argument from Design) A. William Paley ( ) B. Definition: teleological C. Two more types of arguments (adding to the syllogism and reductio ad absurdum forms of argument that we ve seen so far) D. The Argument E. Hume s Reply F. Darwinian Reply: 1859 The Origin of Species G. The Rub 1. This continued debate over the Teleological Argument is very near the heart of the conflict between science and religion a. This argument definitely motivates the resistance of a vocal segment of society to evolutionary theory in particular b. It s not that evolution implies that we are related to monkeys and other apes that is mainly rhetoric 2. What made Darwin s theory so controversial was that it undermined what had previously been the most convincing and persuasive positive argument for God s existence a. Prior to Darwin, the only plausible explanation for the spectacular design found in the biosphere was some extraordinary intelligence b. But Darwin showed that there was another explanation c. In the years since, the Darwinian explanation has again and again proven to be the better of the two i. Simpler
2 A. Doesn t need to posit the existence of a supernatural entity of any sort B. Ockham s Razor ii. Can account for more of the available evidence A. Including, particular, suboptimality B. But also fossils, etc. iii. Is consilient, or fits better with what we know in other areas of knowledge A. Physics B. Chemistry C. Genetics D. Geology 1. Especially deep geological time 2. Tectonic Plate theory 3. Does the failure of the Teleological Argument mean, or show, or imply that God does not exist? a. In and of itself, NO! i. It just means that those premises don t establish, or provide good reason to believe, that conclusion ii. Remember, a bad or unconvincing argument can still have a true conclusion iii. Consider an example: A. P1: Roses are blue B. P2: Violets are red C. Con: The Earth is the 3 rd planet from the sun b. Rejecting the Argument from Design does not show that God exists is false c. What it does show is that one important argument i. Fails to establish that God exists is true ii. So no longer provides a good positive reason to believe that God exists is true H. Dennett s polemic: So why is Intelligent Design theory still around? 1. The theory of evolution is complicated, and even more counterintuitive hard to get one s mind around a. The process is slow and dumb, but cumulative b. Given enough time a process that is not intelligent, foresighted nor has any purpose of its own c. Can create organisms that are intelligent, foresighted and have their own purposes 2. But other sciences are complicated and counterintuitive, too: quantum physics, relativity theory, game theory a. One might very well ask: i. Why isn t there similar resistance to these other counterintuitive theories? ii. Why all the fuss over and resistance to Darwinian evolution, to this one in particular? b. To which Dennett provides the answer:
3 i. Evolution by natural selection is different because there is a (vocal, well-funded) motivation to resist it ii. Namely, this theory seems to knock down one of the best reason we had for believing in God 3. Dennett is not arguing that God doesn t exist a. (Though he is a confirmed atheist, he is not directly arguing for that position here) b. In this piece, Dennett is arguing that despite what it claims Intelligent Design (ID) Theory and evolution are not i. On equal epistemological footing ii. Nor are they equally credible c. Dennett mainly holds this because Intelligent Design Theory is not a legitimate science i. It does not play by the same rules as sciences do A. He implies that it is not a science, but what is sometimes called a pseudoscience B. That ID theory is more like astrology or alchemy than astronomy or chemistry ii. Dennett concludes that ID theory A. Is not even in genuine scientific competition with evolutionary theory B. So should not be taught in science classes 1. For more on what sets sciences apart from pseudosciences 2. Consider taking our Philosophy of Science course PHIL 421 V. The Problem of Evil (P of E): Perennial Problem in the Philosophy of Religion A. David Hume ( ) 1. Lived in Edinburgh, Scotland, where he was a major figure in the Scottish Enlightenment 2. Worked as a librarian, in minor government positions, and briefly as a paid companion to a mad nobleman (?!?) 3. A Central British Empiricist, 1 of greatest philosophers of all time a. He is Philo in the Dialogues you read b. He s a great skeptic, and probably an atheist 4. His magnum opus Treatise on Human Nature was published before he was 30, and either panned or ignored a. In his own words, fell stillborn from the press b. Now regarded as a Masterpiece of philosophy c. Philosophy and his skeptical conclusions so depressed him he eventually gave it up & became a historian a good one B. Best argument against the existence of the Basic JCM God 1. Still directly about God s existence a. The conclusion tries to establish that God does not exist b. Not anything about belief or rationality 2. Opposite from the conclusion of the Classic Trinity of arguments C. Quick and Dirty Version 1. In Philo s words (who is largely expressing Hume s view):
4 2. Epicurus old questions have still not been answered. Is He [God] willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then were does evil come from? D. Fleshed Out Argument 1. Premise 1: Western Monotheisms maintain that God is omniscient, omnipotent, perfectly good, and loves mankind a. This comes from the definition of the Basic JCM God b. The God whose existence is under consideration here 2. Premise 2: There has been and continues to be an enormous amount of pain and suffering in the world a. More specifically: i. Some suffering is caused by other people A. Battle of Gettysburg July 1-3, 1863: ~50,000 casualties in 3 days B. Holocaust killed an estimated 6 million Jews ii. Some suffering is not caused by other people A. Haiti Earthquake: January 12 th 2010: 1. ~230,000 people died 2. ~300,000 injured 3. ~1,000,000 made homeless B. Boxer Day Tsunami, December 26 th 2004: resulted in the deaths of ~230,000 people C. In 1931, floods in China killed between 1 and 4 million people 1. Insurance companies call natural disasters like these, tellingly 2. Acts of God D. Black Death or Bubonic Plague 1. Swept through Europe mid 1300 s 2. Estimated to have killed 1/3 of the population iii. Among the sufferers are people, like young children, who are clearly not guilty of any sin or wickedness A. Many die horrible deaths in natural disasters B. SIDS still results in the death of about 2500 infants a year b. This premise is supported by observation of difficult to deny empirical facts about our world 3. Premise 3: The existence of this suffering is incompatible with the existence of the Basic JCM God a. An omnipotent God would be all powerful i. So he d have the power prevent that suffering ii. Thus could prevent it, provided that he knew how and wanted to b. An omniscient God would be all knowing i. So he d know that and when indeed, would have always known the suffering would occur
5 ii. He would also know how to prevent it, provided he had the power and wanted to iii. So he d have the knowledge to prevent the suffering c. A perfectly benevolent God would love us completely i. So he would want to prevent our suffering ii. Thus should prevent it, provided that he had the power and knew how iii. Further support: A. In general, it seems impossible to be both 1. Good and loving, on the one hand 2. To allow pain and suffering that you can prevent, on the other hand B. An omnipotent, omniscient being who allowed such vast suffering to occur would not be morally good C. Indeed, would seem to be a little sadistic! 4. Therefore, God doesn t exist. E. Theodicy: 1. In general, a theodicy is an attempt to vindicate God, or reconcile a. God s existence and goodness b. With the evil, pain, and suffering evident in the world 2. In other words: an attempt to answer or respond to the P of E 3. Many famous theodicies in the Western tradition a. Leibniz (from whom the term is taken) b. Kant c. Various Biblical theodicies 4. Editorial Comment a. When evaluating these, beware argumentative or rhetorical strategies that avoid engaging with the P of E argument b. By using some kind of semantic shenanigans i. Changing the meaning of the words involved in the statement of the argument ii. And the meaning of the same words in the response to the argument c. Or by attempting to alter the terms of the argument itself F. 5 Responses and Replies 1. Suffering is not real, it is only apparent a. Perhaps this idea is more plausible when paired with some (perhaps mystical or Buddhist) other claim, that the entire world of the senses is itself an illusion, and so not real b. Defender of P of E: This is mere semantic shenanigans, a sort of verbal bait and switch that depends on subtly switching the meaning of the terms involved i. If the terms suffering and real A. Mean what they normally mean to us B. And retain that meaning in the context of the Problem of Evil argument ii. Then claiming suffering is not real is simply absurd
6 2. God s love and goodness are Divine love and goodness, and are thus not to be judged by human standards a. Defender of P of E: this is explicitly semantic shenanigans, an explicit shift in the meaning of the terms involved i. We now have two different sets of words in play A. Love DIVINE, goodness DIVINE. pain DIVINE, suffering DIVINE B. Love HUMAN and goodness HUMAN, pain HUMAN, suffering HUMAN ii. This theodicy isn t even talking about the same thing that the Defender of the P of E is talking about iii. So this attempt can not even engage with the P of E b. The Defender of the P of E is concerned with a God that is good and loves us in our sense of those terms 3. Suffering builds character a. Sometimes, suffering results in good outcomes i. Going through hard times builds character, temperance, fortitude, and other virtues ii. Through pain and suffering comes greater good b. This response doesn t involve semantic shenanigans i. Suffering has not changed meanings here ii. good means what we usually take it to mean, and what the defender of the P of E means by it c. Defender of P of E has two replies: i. An unconstrained, omnipotent and omniscient God could have found a better way to build character A. Some less horrible way B. A way that avoids such terrible suffering ii. Intense pain and suffering does not always lead to better character, or even good outcomes A. Sometimes it turns people bitter and cold B. Sometimes it leads straight to (sometimes horrible) death 4. Argument from Free Will: a. Skeptics of the P of E: i. God could have, of course, built us without free will ii. He gave us free will, however, because A. Without it we would not really be people B. Free will is itself a great good iii. Since God did give us free will, though, we must be free to choose and do evil ourselves b. Defenders of P of E has two replies: i. First Reply (Mackie): A. It is possible for people to 1. Have the freedom to choose evil 2. But to never do so B. It s not just possible, but in fact 1. Most people do this
7 2. Most of the time C. An omnipotent & omniscient God could have created a world full of such people and only such people! ii. Second Reply (Traditional): A. Much suffering is not caused by people or their freely made choices 1. Haitian Earthquake 2. Bubonic Plague 3. Boxing Day Tsunami 4. China Floods 5. SIDS deaths B. In these cases, the free will objection fails to engage all of the elements of the argument 1. For these types of causes of suffering 2. Just reiterate the P of A argument: a. An omniscient God would know they were coming, b. An omnipotent God could prevent them from happening c. And a benevolent God would
New Chapter: Philosophy of Religion
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 3: 1-16 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Aquinas s The Summa Theologica (The Cosmological Argument) b. Anselm, Proslogium (The
More informationPain, Suffering, and a Benevolent God. Topic: The Problem of Good and Evil
Pain, Suffering, and a Benevolent God Topic: The Problem of Good and Evil 1 The philosophical argument for the Problem of Evil, is an argument attempting to prove that an omnipotent, good, loving God as
More informationThe Clock without a Maker
The Clock without a Maker There are a many great questions in life in which people have asked themselves. Who are we? What is the meaning of life? Where do come from? This paper will be undertaking the
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 14: 2-22 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding b. Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between
More informationLook at this famous painting what s missing? What could YOU deduce about human nature from this picture? Write your thoughts on this sheet!
* Look at this famous painting what s missing? What could YOU deduce about human nature from this picture? Write your thoughts on this sheet! If there is NO GOD then. What is our origin? What is our purpose?
More informationTheme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS
A. Inductive arguments cosmological Inductive proofs Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS the concept of a posteriori. Cosmological argument: St Thomas Aquinas first Three Ways 1.
More informationReligious and non religious beliefs and teachings about the origin of the universe.
Friday, 23 February 2018 Religious and non religious beliefs and teachings about the origin of the universe. L.O. To understand that science has alternative theories to the religious creation stories:
More informationThe midterm will be held in class two weeks from today, on Thursday, October 9. It will be worth 20% of your grade.
The design argument First, some discussion of the midterm exam. The midterm will be held in class two weeks from today, on Thursday, October 9. It will be worth 20% of your grade. The material which will
More informationPhil 83- Introduction to Philosophical Problems Spring 2018 Course # office hours: M/W/F, 12pm-1pm, and by appointment. Course Description:
Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 10am- 10:50am Room: Biddle 211 Instructor: Dr. Derek Leben leben@pitt.edu Phil 83- Introduction to Philosophical Problems Spring 2018 Course #24742 office hours: M/W/F, 12pm-1pm,
More informationThe Existence of God
The Existence of God The meaning of the words theist, atheist and agnostic Atheist- person who does not believe in God. Theist- Person who does believe in God Agnostic- Person who does not know if God
More informationGod After Darwin. 1. Evolution s s Challenge to Faith. July 23, to 9:50 am in the Parlor All are welcome!
God After Darwin 1. Evolution s s Challenge to Faith July 23, 2006 9 to 9:50 am in the Parlor All are welcome! Almighty and everlasting God, you made the universe with all its marvelous order, its atoms,
More informationAtheism: A Christian Response
Atheism: A Christian Response What do atheists believe about belief? Atheists Moral Objections An atheist is someone who believes there is no God. There are at least five million atheists in the United
More informationRevelation: God revealing himself to religious believers.
Revelation: God revealing himself to religious believers. Nature of God - What God s character is like. Atheist a person who believes that there is no god. Agnostic A person who believes that we cannot
More informationPhilosophy of Religion. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Religion Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationThe Problem of Evil. Prof. Eden Lin The Ohio State University
The Problem of Evil Prof. Eden Lin The Ohio State University Where We Are You have considered some questions about the nature of God: What does it mean for God to be omnipotent? Does God s omniscience
More informationGCE MARKING SCHEME SUMMER 2016 RELIGIOUS STUDIES RS1/2 PHIL INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION 1343/01. WJEC CBAC Ltd.
GCE MARKING SCHEME SUMMER 2016 RELIGIOUS STUDIES RS1/2 PHIL INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION 1343/01 INTRODUCTION This marking scheme was used by WJEC for the 2016 examination. It was finalised after
More informationReading Questions for Phil , Fall 2016 (Daniel)
Reading Questions for Phil 251.501, Fall 2016 (Daniel) Class One (Aug. 30): Philosophy Up to Plato (SW 3-78) 1. What does it mean to say that philosophy replaces myth as an explanatory device starting
More informationThe free will defense
The free will defense Last time we began discussing the central argument against the existence of God, which I presented as the following reductio ad absurdum of the proposition that God exists: 1. God
More informationWelcome back to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Together.
Welcome back to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Together. Last week we started considering some rational theistic proofs for the existence of God with particular reference to those intellectual barriers
More informationA CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment
A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE A Paper Presented to Dr. Douglas Blount Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for PHREL 4313 by Billy Marsh October 20,
More informationDoes God exist? The argument from evil
Does God exist? The argument from evil One of the oldest, and most important, arguments against the existence of God tries to show that the idea that God is all-powerful and all-good contradicts a very
More informationReview Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
More informationWhy does a supposedly powerful and good God allow natural and moral evil to occur?
The Problem of Evil Two types of evil : Moral and Natural Moral Evil: The evil that people deliberately choose to do to one another Natural Evil: The evil that occurs naturally e.g. disease, natural disasters
More informationAssessment: Student accomplishment of expected student outcomes will be assessed using the following measures
Philosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Spring, 2017 Section 4160, Online Course Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu Office: SOCS 108 Office
More informationPhilosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Summer, 2016 Section 4173, Online Course
Philosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Summer, 2016 Section 4173, Online Course Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu Office: SOCS 108 Office
More informationMedia Critique #5. Exercise #8 4/29/2010. Critique the Bullshit!
Media Critique #5 Exercise #8 Critique the Bullshit! Do your best to answer the following questions after class: 1. What are the strong points of this episode? 2. Weak points and criticisms? 3. How would
More informationPhilosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Spring, 2017 Section 2664, Room SOCS 205, MW 11:15am-12:40pm
Philosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Spring, 2017 Section 2664, Room SOCS 205, MW 11:15am-12:40pm Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu
More informationA level Religious Studies at Titus Salt
Component 2 Philosophy of Religion Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive This theme considers how the philosophy of religion has, over time, influenced and been influenced by developments
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110 CRN Sec 018 Fall Term 2009 Purdue University Instructor: Daniel Kelly
1. Course Description Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110 CRN 25219 Sec 018 Fall Term 2009 Purdue University Instructor: Daniel Kelly Syllabus There are two main goals of this course. The first is
More informationPhilosophy of Religion PHIL (CRN 22046) RELG (CRN 22047) Spring 2014 T 5:00-6:15 Kinard 205
Philosophy of Religion PHIL 390-001 (CRN 22046) RELG 390-001 (CRN 22047) Spring 2014 T 5:00-6:15 Kinard 205 Professor Information Dr. William P. Kiblinger Office: Kinard 326 Office Hours: Thurs. - Fri.
More informationGround Work 01 part one God His Existence Genesis 1:1/Psalm 19:1-4
Ground Work 01 part one God His Existence Genesis 1:1/Psalm 19:1-4 Introduction Tonight we begin a brand new series I have entitled ground work laying a foundation for faith o It is so important that everyone
More informationThe problem of evil & the free will defense
The problem of evil & the free will defense Our topic today is the argument from evil against the existence of God, and some replies to that argument. But before starting on that discussion, I d like to
More informationRESPONSES TO ORIGIN OF SPECIES
RESPONSES TO ORIGIN OF SPECIES Science/Religion Conflict? 1860 British Association debate between Bishop Samuel ( Soapy Sam ) Wilberforce and Thomas Henry ( Darwin s Bulldog ) Huxley. Are you descended
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationKCHU 228 INTRO TO PHILOSOPHY FINAL PROJECT. The Instructors Requirements for the Project. Drafting and Submitting a Project Proposal (Due: 3/3/09)
KCHU 228 INTRO TO PHILOSOPHY FINAL PROJECT Your final project is due on April 7 th and will count for 15% of your final grade. You will decide what your goals are for this project. You will design how
More informationWhy Believe in God, Eccl.1
Intro: Many of us, I am sure, have experienced children going through the why phase. Know what I mean? Daddy, why is the grass green? ( Ah, because we paint it that color. Go ask your mother! ). Daddy,
More informationGCE. Religious Studies. Mark Scheme for June Advanced Subsidiary GCE Unit G571: Philosophy of Religion. Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations
GCE Religious Studies Advanced Subsidiary GCE Unit G571: Philosophy of Religion Mark Scheme for June 2013 Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA) is a leading UK awarding body,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALGARY. Philosophy 331 Fall 2008 Philosophy of Religion
UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY 1 Philosophy 331 Fall 2008 Philosophy of Religion Professor: Christopher Framarin email: chris.framarin@ucalgary.ca Office: 1212 SS Office Hours: T 2:00 4:00 and by appointment Course
More informationPHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1
Y e P a g e 1 Exercise 1 Pg. 17 1. When is an idea or statement valid? (trick question) A statement or an idea cannot be valid; they can only be true or false. Being valid or invalid are properties of
More informationThe Ontological Argument
Running Head: THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1 The Ontological Argument By Andy Caldwell Salt Lake Community College Philosophy of Religion 2350 THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 2 Abstract This paper will reproduce,
More informationKelly James Clark and Raymond VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief, Oxford UP, 2011, 240pp., $65.00 (hbk), ISBN
Kelly James Clark and Raymond VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief, Oxford UP, 2011, 240pp., $65.00 (hbk), ISBN 0199603715. Evidence and Religious Belief is a collection of essays organized
More informationReflection Please stand behind your chairs. Lesson Reflection
Lesson Reflection Reflection Please stand behind your chairs Please give me the faith so that throughout this lesson and in every lesson I can persevere with my learning, have respect for others so that
More informationTHE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE
THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE By Kenneth Richard Samples The influential British mathematician-philosopher Bertrand Russell once remarked, "I am as firmly convinced that religions do
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 11: 2-13 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy (full.pdf) 2. Next time a. Descartes, Meditations
More informationPHIL 251 Varner 2018c Final exam Page 1 Filename = 2018c-Exam3-KEY.wpd
PHIL 251 Varner 2018c Final exam Page 1 Your first name: Your last name: K_E_Y Part one (multiple choice, worth 20% of course grade): Indicate the best answer to each question on your Scantron by filling
More informationKey Vocab and Concepts. Ethics, Epistemology, Aesthetics, logic, social and political, religious, metaphysics
Students will demonstrate Key Vocab and Concepts Resources Assessment COURSE GOALS Students will Use logic and the analytical process to increase one's world: personal life, politics, learning, arts Display
More informationPhil 104: Introduction to Philosophy
Phil 104: Introduction to Philosophy December 24, 2012 Instructor: Carlotta Pavese. Time: 9.50-11.10am, Mondays and Thursdays. Place: Classroom B2, Frelinghuysen Hall. Website: Sakai. Email: carlotta.pavese@gmail.com.
More informationThe Existence of God Past exam Questions
! The Existence of God Past exam Questions 2010-2012 1 Read the passage below, which describes a religious experience. One dark autumn afternoon I was sitting alone. I suddenly became aware of a holy presence
More informationDarwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading
Darwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading I recently attended a debate on Intelligent Design (ID) and the Existence of God. One of the four debaters was Dr. Lawrence Krauss{1}
More informationWk 10Y5 Existence of God 2 - October 26, 2018
1 2 3 4 5 The Existence of God (2) Module: Philosophy Lesson 10 Some Recommended Resources Reasonable Faith, by William Lane Craig. pp. 91-204 To Everyone an Answer, by Beckwith, Craig, and Moreland. pp.
More informationChapter 2--How Do I Know Whether God Exists?
Chapter 2--How Do I Know Whether God Exists? 1. Augustine was born in A. India B. England C. North Africa D. Italy 2. Augustine was born in A. 1 st century AD B. 4 th century AD C. 7 th century AD D. 10
More informationPrinciple of Sufficient Reason
Designer Universe Principle of Sufficient Reason There can be found no fact that is true or existent, or any true proposition, without there being a sufficient reason for its being so and not otherwise,
More information7/31/2017. Kant and Our Ineradicable Desire to be God
Radical Evil Kant and Our Ineradicable Desire to be God 1 Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Kant indeed marks the end of the Enlightenment: he brought its most fundamental assumptions concerning the powers of
More informationCourse Text. Course Description. Course Objectives. StraighterLine Introduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy Course Text Moore, Brooke Noel and Kenneth Bruder. Philosophy: The Power of Ideas, 7th edition, McGraw-Hill, 2008. ISBN: 9780073535722 [This text is available as an etextbook
More informationOn Some Alleged Consequences Of The Hartle-Hawking Cosmology. In [3], Quentin Smith claims that the Hartle-Hawking cosmology is inconsistent with
On Some Alleged Consequences Of The Hartle-Hawking Cosmology In [3], Quentin Smith claims that the Hartle-Hawking cosmology is inconsistent with classical theism in a way which redounds to the discredit
More informationKeeping Your Kids On God s Side - Natasha Crain
XXXIII. Why do Christians have varying views on how and when God created the world? 355. YEC s (young earth creationists) and OEC s (old earth creationists) about the age of the earth but they that God
More informationPhilosophy 305 Introduction to Philosophy of Religion Fall 2016 (also listed as CTI 310, RS 305) 42270; 33770; WAG 302 MWF 2-3
Philosophy 305 Introduction to Philosophy of Religion Fall 2016 (also listed as CTI 310, RS 305) 42270; 33770; 43535 WAG 302 MWF 2-3 Stephen Phillips WAG 301 Fall Office Hours: M & F 3-4 & by appointment
More informationExemplars. AS Religious Studies: Paper 1 Philosophy of Religion
Exemplars AS Religious Studies: Paper 1 Philosophy of Religion AS Religious Studies Exemplars: Paper 1 Philosophy of Religion Contents Introduction 1 Question 1 2 Question 2 7 Question 3 14 Question 4a
More informationINTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY
INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY Brandeis University Fall 2017 Professor Andreas Teuber I. Introduction The course seeks to understand as well as answer a number of central questions in philosophy through the
More informationThe Nature of Science: Methods for Seeking Natural Patterns in the Universe Using Rationalism and Empiricism Mike Viney
The Nature of Science: Methods for Seeking Natural Patterns in the Universe Using Rationalism and Empiricism Mike Viney Fascination with science often starts at an early age, as it did with me. Many students
More informationArgument from Design. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. David Hume
Argument from Design Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion David Hume Dialogues published posthumously and anonymously (1779) Three Characters Demea: theism, dogmatism, some philosophical arguments for
More informationEnding The Scandal. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
366 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Semicompatibilism Narrow Incompatibilism
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110 Fall Term 2010 Purdue University Instructor: Daniel Kelly
1. Course Description Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110 Fall Term 2010 Purdue University Instructor: Daniel Kelly Syllabus There are two main goals of this course. The first is to introduce students
More informationPhilosophical Approaches to Religion
Philosophical Approaches to Religion Prof. Jeffrey Dunn Spring 2009 MWF 12:20-1:10 Bartlett 206 UMass, Amherst Office: Office Hours: Email: Homepage: 367 Bartlett Th 10-11, by appt. jdunn@philos.umass.edu
More informationTHE IMPACT OF DARWIN S THEORIES. Darwin s Theories and Human Nature
Darwin s Theories and Human Nature I. Preliminary Questions: 1. Is science a better methodology to discover truth about human nature? 2. Should secular, scientific, claims to a prescription of what is
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 12: 2-15 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy (full.pdf) 2. Next week a. Locke, An Essay
More informationBelieving in Dinosaurs A Sermon by the Rev. Dr. Stephanie May First Parish in Wayland March 26, 2017
Believing in Dinosaurs A Sermon by the Rev. Dr. Stephanie May First Parish in Wayland March 26, 2017 In the news this week, there was an item pertinent to today s sermon. A graduate student has proposed
More information1. What is Philosophy?
[Welcome to the first handout of your Introduction to Philosophy Mooc! This handout is designed to complement the video lecture by giving you a written summary of the key points covered in the videos.
More informationFAITH & reason. The Pope and Evolution Anthony Andres. Winter 2001 Vol. XXVI, No. 4
FAITH & reason The Journal of Christendom College Winter 2001 Vol. XXVI, No. 4 The Pope and Evolution Anthony Andres ope John Paul II, in a speech given on October 22, 1996 to the Pontifical Academy of
More informationTable of x III. Modern Modal Ontological Arguments Norman Malcolm s argument Charles Hartshorne s argument A fly in the ointment? 86
Table of Preface page xvii divinity I. God, god, and God 3 1. Existence and essence questions 3 2. Names in questions of existence and belief 4 3. Etymology and semantics 6 4. The core attitudinal conception
More informationCourse Description: Texts Exploring Philosophy of Religion (2 nd ), ed. Steven Cahn. Requirements:
Phil 474- Philosophy of Religion Fall 2018 Course # 31152 Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 2pm-2:50pm Room: Biddle 252 Instructor: Dr. Derek Leben leben@pitt.edu office hours: MWF, 1-2pm, and by appointment
More informationKS4 Religious Studies - Study Guide
Page 1 KEY WORDS - unlocking the door to success Numinous Conversion Miracle Prayer Design Causation Agnosticism Atheism Moral evil Natural evil Omnipotent Benevolent Omniscient The feeling of the presence
More informationSuffering. These icons indicate that teacher s notes or useful web addresses are available in the Notes Page.
Suffering These icons indicate that teacher s notes or useful web addresses are available in the Notes Page. This icon indicates the slide contains activities created in Flash. These activities are not
More informationChristian Evidences. The Verification of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 06 of 12
Christian Evidences CA312 LESSON 06 of 12 Victor M. Matthews, STD Former Professor of Systematic Theology Grand Rapids Theological Seminary This is lecture 6 of the course entitled Christian Evidences.
More informationINTELLIGENT DESIGN & NATURAL REVELATION S2
Design Episode 90 INTELLIGENT DESIGN & NATURAL REVELATION S2 I. KEY THOUGHTS 1. Definition of Intelligent Design S4 DEF: BELIEF that the beauty, complexity, and functionality in nature reflect rationality
More informationScientific Dimensions of the Debate. 1. Natural and Artificial Selection: the Analogy (17-20)
I. Johnson s Darwin on Trial A. The Legal Setting (Ch. 1) Scientific Dimensions of the Debate This is mainly an introduction to the work as a whole. Note, in particular, Johnson s claim that a fact of
More informationThe Riddle of Epicurus
Nada Amin 21L.448J Essay #2 Page 1 of 5 The Riddle of Epicurus In David Hume s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Voltaire s Candide, the characters struggle to reconcile the existence of evil with
More informationA Biblical Perspective on the Philosophy of Science
A Biblical Perspective on the Philosophy of Science Leonard R. Brand, Loma Linda University I. Christianity and the Nature of Science There is reason to believe that Christianity provided the ideal culture
More informationPhilosophy 100: Problems of Philosophy (Honors) (Spring 2014)
Philosophy 100: Problems of Philosophy (Honors) (Spring 2014) Armstrong Hall 306; MWF 10:30 11:20 AM Instructor: Geoff Georgi (gbgeorgi@mix.wvu.edu) Office Hours: T 2:30 4:00 PM, W 3:30 5:00 PM, and by
More informationINTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY
LAST UPDATE ON 8/22/09 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY Philosophy 104 -- Fall Term, 2009 Sections 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08 & H1 Professor Stephen Stich Ms. Lee-Sun Choi Mr. Pavel Davydov Mr. Ben Levinstein
More informationThe Debate Between Evolution and Intelligent Design Rick Garlikov
The Debate Between Evolution and Intelligent Design Rick Garlikov Handled intelligently and reasonably, the debate between evolution (the theory that life evolved by random mutation and natural selection)
More informationGodforsaken: Bad Things Happen. Is There A God Who Cares? Yes. Here's Proof. Ebook
Godforsaken: Bad Things Happen. Is There A God Who Cares? Yes. Here's Proof. Ebook For a lot of people, the biggest question about God is not, surprisingly enough, whether he exists. Instead, it is about
More informationSuppose some evil appeared to us to be gratuitous. How far would that fact count against belief in God?
Suppose some evil appeared to us to be gratuitous. How far would that fact count against belief in God? The problem of evil is one of the oldest questions of religion and philosophy- the two oldest books
More informationEvolution and the Mind of God
Evolution and the Mind of God Robert T. Longo rtlongo370@gmail.com September 3, 2017 Abstract This essay asks the question who, or what, is God. This is not new. Philosophers and religions have made many
More informationAbstract. Coping with Difficult, Unanswered, and Unanswerable Questions
Abstract Coping with Difficult, Unanswered, and Unanswerable Questions Difficult, Unanswered, and Unanswerable Questions are often catalysts for paradigm shifts in technology, medicine, and in personal
More informationDoes God exist? (part one)
Does God exist? (part one) Three Propositional Attitudes Theism Belief in P Atheism Disbelief in P Agnosticism Withholding judgment about P P = God exists. Three Philosophical Attitudes Philosophical Theism
More informationTheme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS
A. Inductive arguments cosmological Inductive proofs Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS the concept of a posteriori. Cosmological argument: St Thomas Aquinas first Three Ways 1.
More informationYou should be able to explain and evaluate the Design argument, including its strengths and weaknesses
Theme C: Existence of God and Revelation. You should be able to explain and evaluate the Design argument, including its strengths and weaknesses Design (TELEOLOGICAL) Argument: The Argument that God designed
More informationIs Evolution Incompatible with Intelligent Design? Outline
Is Evolution Incompatible with Intelligent Design? Edwin Chong Mensa AG, July 4, 2008 MensaAG 7/4/08 1 Outline Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (ID) What are the claims on each side? Sorting out the claims.
More informationPhilosophy of Religion (PHIL11159)
. Philosophy of Religion (PHIL11159) Course Organiser Dr. James Henry Collin University of Edinburgh COURSE AIMS AND OBJECTIVES This is a level 11 course for students seeking an advanced introduction to
More informationThe evolutionizing of a culture CARL KERBY & KEN HAM
1 The evolutionizing of a culture CARL KERBY & KEN HAM As you picked up this book, you may have asked yourself, Why should I care about this stuff? What do worldviews have to do with me? Who cares about
More informationAdapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument
Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey Counter-Argument When you write an academic essay, you make an argument: you propose a thesis
More informationProcess Theology. A Short Course Michael A. Soderstrand Wellspring UCC Wednesday Morning Group June 11 August 20, 2010, 10:30am
Process Theology A Short Course Michael A. Soderstrand Wellspring UCC Wednesday Morning Group June 11 August 20, 2010, 10:30am Based on the textbook: C. Robert Mesle, Process Theology A Basic Introduction,
More informationAquinas 5 Proofs for God exists
智覺學苑 Academy of Wisdom and Enlightenment Posted: Aug 2, 2017 www.awe-edu.com info@ AWE-edu.com Aquinas 5 Proofs for God exists http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/aquinasfiveways_argumentanalysis.htm
More informationPhilosophy of Science PHIL 241, MW 12:00-1:15
Philosophy of Science PHIL 241, MW 12:00-1:15 Naomi Fisher nfisher@clarku.edu (508) 793-7648 Office: 35 Beck (Philosophy) House (on the third floor) Office hours: MR 10:00-11:00 and by appointment Course
More informationUnless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the New King James Version of the Bible.
First printing: October 2011 Copyright 2011 by Answers in Genesis USA. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission of the publisher,
More informationEthos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade
Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade by Dr. John R. Edlund, Cal Poly Pomona Over 2,000 years ago the Greek philosopher Aristotle argued that there were three basic ways to persuade an audience
More informationSearle vs. Chalmers Debate, 8/2005 with Death Monkey (Kevin Dolan)
Searle vs. Chalmers Debate, 8/2005 with Death Monkey (Kevin Dolan) : Searle says of Chalmers book, The Conscious Mind, "it is one thing to bite the occasional bullet here and there, but this book consumes
More informationIntroduction to Christian Apologetics June 1 st and 8 th
Introduction to Christian Apologetics June 1 st and 8 th Instead, you must worship Christ as Lord of your life. And if someone asks about your Christian hope, always be ready to explain it. 1 Peter 3:15
More informationCritique of Cosmological Argument
David Hume: Critique of Cosmological Argument Critique of Cosmological Argument DAVID HUME (1711-1776) David Hume is one of the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Born in Edinburgh,
More information