The Cambridge Companion to Socrates
|
|
- Elijah Stephens
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Donald Morrison, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. xv, 413. ISBN: $29.99 paper; $95.00 hardbound. This book offers fifteen chapters on various topics, all by well-known scholars, though some are not famous for their work on Socrates. The collection itself is a bit of an oddity, as the editor himself is skeptical regarding what has come to be called the Socrates problem, and thus does not really believe that Socrates holds any specific position in the history of philosophy. The editor s own position would appear to leave unmotivated the entire idea of a collection of this sort, and seems to have left the editor without any clear vision of precisely what the collection was supposed to do for its readership. Instead, Morrison says he decided to invite a diverse group of contributors to define the Socrates who is the subject of their individual chapters differently (xiv). The result is a level of inconsistency in terms of contributors uses of sources texts and historical approach that readers may find confusing. Morrison s own view conforms well to the chapter by Louis-André Dorion ( The Rise and Fall of the Socratic Problem ), which reviews some of the history of the problem, and concludes that the problem itself is now also history, as completely resolved in favor of skepticism about the historical Socrates. Dorion concludes that all that is now left for scholars to do on the topic of Socrates is to study the character of that name in the many works by different authors in which a Socrates appears, and then perhaps consider how, and eventually why, a single theme spawned multiple interpretations more or less compatible with each other (20) a task that Dorion (and others he cites) think will not at all diminish our skepticism concerning the possibility of resolving the Socratic problem on the basis of the logoi sokratikoi (ibid). Dorion thus discounts utterly the historical hypothesis that would explain compatibilities in these texts in terms of their common reference to the historical Socrates. Those of us who work on Socrates are well aware of the contradictions among the ancient testimonies. Not all of us, however, are as convinced that at least glimpses of the historical Socrates may not be obtained through occasional agreements we find among the surviving texts. The next three chapters add basis to the skepticism with which the book begins. Diogenes Laertius reports that seven of Socrates so-called students qualify as the most important ones, but only works by Plato and Xenophon among these seven have survived. Klaus Döring surveys what can be known about the five other authors associated with Socrates (Aeschines of Sphettus, Phaedo of Elis, Euclides of Megara, Aristippus of Cyrene, and Antisthenes). Döring s review of what can be known of these sources reveals little in the way of agreement in their various portraits of Socrates. Döring s chapter is followed by a chapter devoted to Xenophon (by David K. O Connor), which also makes no effort to find points of consistency to others portraits. O Connor does provide a clear and useful survey of the points emphasized in Xenophon s works (without any real attention to the Oeconomicus, which is mentioned as a Socratic dialogue at the beginning of the chapter, but only cited twice in footnotes AHB Online Reviews 1 (2011) 8 13
2 subsequently had O Connor wanted to emphasize inconsistencies to the Platonic portrait of Socrates, he could certainly have found ample evidence to exploit in the Oeconomicus). I am not sure why, but not until the fourth chapter do we find a study (by David Konstan) of Socrates role in what is certainly the earliest of the works treated in this collection: Aristophanes Clouds. Konstan deftly reviews the inherent inconsistencies in Aristophanes portrait, and (not especially controversially) concludes that Aristophanes assembled a hodge-podge of intellectual pursuits [ ] and combined them all in Socrates (85). As such, it would obviously be pointless to look to Aristophanes for evidence of the historical Socrates. Paul Woodruff s chapter five ( Socrates and the New Learning ) takes a wholly different approach. Though Woodruff never directly identifies the Socrates of Plato with the historical Socrates, readers will likely assume that such an identity is required for Woodruff s comparison of what he characterizes as Socrates views with the main lines of thought associated with the Sophists and Nature-Philosophers to whom, if Konstan is right, Socrates is assimilated in the Clouds. The upshot of Woodruff s review is that Socrates was part of the new learning in many ways, but he parted company with its principal teachers on crucial points (101). All of these crucial points are familiar from Socrates critiques of sophistry and natural philosophy in Plato. Mark McPherran, the author of chapter six ( Socratic Religion ), freely cites texts from Plato and Xenophon (and others) in piecing together an account of Socrates various religious beliefs. Again, there is no trace of skepticism about the Socratic Problem here McPherran seems quite comfortable taking the Socrates of the different sources all to refer to the same historical person. But McPherran s chapter, though rich in detail and sophistication, actually manages to leave unexplained some of the actual inconsistencies in the texts he cites (the significant differences in Plato s and Xenophon s versions of the Delphic oracle to Chaerephon, for example, and that the daimonion always turns me away from what I m about to do but never turns me toward anything in Plato s Apology 31d3 4 and elsewhere, but plainly provides positive advice in pseudo- Plato s Theages and Xenophon). McPherran s chapter thus overturns the skepticism with which the volume began, and, until the very last chapter of this collection, sources other than Plato now all but disappear from view in the rest of the book. Josiah Ober writes on Socrates and Democratic Athens. Ober focuses mostly on the trial and execution, and emphasizes that much of what we find in the reports of the early Socratics is actually consistent with what we know of the legal and political context of the time. Even if we are convinced that the Socrates of history is unknown to us, Ober s arguments seem to indicate that drawing historical conclusions from our sources is still not unreasonable. I was somewhat puzzled to read Ober s speculations about the prosecution speech of Meletus. I had always been inclined to think that Meletus had allowed his sunēgoroi (Lycon and particularly Anytus) carry most of the weight of the prosecution. Ober commits one ghastly error in his chapter, however, in his claim that Page 9
3 the Platonic Socrates counterpenalty proposal was a bizarre conglomerate penalty : a substantial fine [ ] conjoined with the extraordinary honor of taking meals in the public dining hall (prytaneion) for the rest of his life (146). But the text actually makes very plain that the proposal of free meals is counterfactual: it is what Socrates would propose were he to propose a penalty supposed to be one suited to his actual activities in Athens. The fine is obviously the only actual counterpenalty Socrates proposes to the jurors: see 38b9: timōmai oun tosoutou [the fine of 30 minas]. Those who already know Hugh H. Benson s work on the Socratic method and conception of knowledge/wisdom will be familiar with the views for which he argues in his chapter. Benson argues for that the single requirement of elenctic argument is the doxastic constraint, such that the interlocutor must always and only argue for what he himself believes. From this, Benson concludes that the constructivist account of the elenchus (which holds that Socrates uses elenchus to argue for certain positions and against others, with confident conclusions that he has achieved such results) is mistaken. Instead, Socrates tests others for wisdom, and when (and because) they cannot maintain consistency, he concludes that they are not wise. Constructive argument, Benson contends, would require a different method. Benson notes that other scholars have not always agreed with his position, but perhaps the most compelling dissenter (Alejandro Santana 2007) is not cited or answered in Benson s chapter. In his chapter on Self-Examination, Christopher Rowe goes beyond the Socratic dialogues considerably by treating the Phaedrus as one of his main sources (and also by citing Republic X later in his chapter). The main thrust of Rowe s argument is that Socrates is not really trying to bring to light beliefs his interlocutor has, but doesn t know that he has, but rather simply to try to figure out whether what they happen to believe is true first, because they all need to know the truth, and second, because if they don t have it to hand now, they need to know that they don t, in order to continue the investigation somewhere else (212). Rowe finds a different form of self-examination in the Phaedrus and Republic X, which seeks to determine whether the real essence of the self includes irrational elements. Rowe concludes that Socrates supposed the self to consist simply in our rational self (214). Accordingly, the image of the soul as a charioteer and two horses in the Phaedrus is, at best, misleading. Never mind the evidence of the tripartite soul in the rest of the Republic, Timaeus, and Laws, none of which Rowe bothers to mention or cite in his chapter. Given his main research focus on the ancient Skeptics, it is not surprising to find the thrust of Richard Bett s chapter on Socratic Ignorance aimed mainly at substantiating the Skeptics claim to be followers of Socrates. In this chapter (Bett s second publication on Socrates, and very like his earlier pieces, Socrates and the Skeptics, which was written for a different companion volume 1 ), Bett calls into question whether or not the 1 Sara Ahbel-Rappe and Rachana Kamtekar, eds., A Companion to Socrates. Oxford: Blackwell Page 10
4 Socratic dialogues of Plato actually present a consistent picture of Socrates at all. Bett concludes they do not: There does not appear to be a conflict within any given dialogue [ ]; but taken as a group, they do appear to point in opposite directions concerning the priority of definition and possession of knowledge in the absence of definition (229). Because Bett s Socrates is a proto-skeptic, however, there is no reason to expect (dogmatic) consistency from him. One of the most original chapters in this collection comes from Melissa Lane, the author of Reconsidering Socratic Irony. Lane takes the reader through various versions of interpretations that make Socratic irony central to the philosophizing we see in Plato s dialogues, and then examines the linguistic and social contexts in which these works were to be understood. Many of the claims interpreters have regarded as ironical seem better understood as simply sincere, in Lane s view. But even more interesting is Lane s sophisticated study of friendly terms of address in Greek, which allows her to read Socrates extravagant (and apparently insincere) praise of his interlocutors in a novel, and very persuasive, way. Her conclusion will be a great disappointment to those who find irony everywhere they look in Plato: Socrates selfdeprecation, such as it is, is not necessarily ironic; ascriptions of eirōneia in Plato do not mean irony; friendship terms of address in Plato do not function ironically; and ironic praise is not, at least in some central cases, best understood as ironic at all (256). Terry Penner continues to show new developments in his conception of Socratic moral psychology, in his chapter, Socratic Ethics and the Socratic Psychology of Action: A Philosophical Framework. In earlier work, Penner seemed to supply no role whatever to the appetites and passions in the explanation of human behavior. But now he finds such a role: [Appetitive desire] gets us to act is to present itself to our desire for happiness, which turns to the belief-system to produce an estimate of the possible gains from various choices for fulfilling this desire. So the desire for drink operates not by its generating any action, but by leading to a belief as to the advantages of fulfilling the desire (263 4) Still unexplained in Penner s latest version, however, are the many apparent endorsements of the uses of punishment throughout the early dialogues. Penner sees that his account is incompatible with the evidence of the Gorgias, so he dismisses that dialogue as transitional. He elects not to mention other passages in which the uses of punishment (including whipping and imprisonment) are mentioned in other Socratic dialogues (e.g. at Cri. 51b5, Hip. Ma. 292b4 11, and esp. Ap. 25d6 26a8 where Socrates seems to make the distinction between the various uses of instruction and punishment explicit). Also missing from Penner s chapter are discussions or citations of many of the more sophisticated treatments of Socratic moral psychology by other scholars that have appeared in recent years, which have emphasized more significant roles for appetites and passions (including, in chronological order, Devereux 1995; Brickhouse and Smith 1997, 2002, and 2007; Boeri 2004; and Singpurwalla 2006). 2 As 2 Daniel T. Devereux Socrates Kantian Conception of Virtue. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33: ; Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith The Problem of Punishment in Socratic Philosophy. In Wisdom, Ignorance, and Virtue: New Essays in Socratic Studies. M. Page 11
5 such, Penner s chapter is already considerably out-of-date with the emerging literature in this area. Christopher Bobonich s chapter on Socrates and Eudaimonia surveys some of the important questions scholars have debated about Socrates commitment to eudaimonism. Bobonich does well to reject the controversial (and uncharitable) attributions to Socrates of what have come to be known as the identity thesis (virtue = happiness), the sufficiency thesis (virtue is sufficient for happiness) and the necessity thesis (virtue is necessary for happiness). As with others in this collection, Bobonich could have profited from reading and considering some other recent work on his topic in Bobonich s case, the very interesting and plausible suggestion by Naomi Reshotko that the relation between virtue and happiness is a nomological one (Reshotko 2006, ). In at least some cases, it appears Bobonich did not understand the other scholars arguments that he does cite (see, for example, his inappropriate citation of Brickhouse s and my 2007 as committed to the view that Socrates recognized the possibility of what Bobonich calls clear-eyed akrasia [310]). The penultimate chapter, by Charles L. Griswold, is supposedly on Socrates Political Philosophy, but Griswold s unitarian approach looks to characterize that philosophy in a way that integrates what Plato has Socrates say on this topic in the Republic, as well. Griswold sees two levels of political philosophy offered by the Platonic Socrates: one, which applies only to philosophers, and which advocates political action at the individual, conversational level, and another for the ordinary citizen. The latter do best within a roughly democratic political structure, and do well to persuade or obey, as per the doctrine announced by the personified Laws in the Crito. This same doctrine does not apply, however, to the mature philosopher, whose autonomy is presumably complete and absolute, and thus permits principled disobedience (350 1). Hence, the arguments the Laws provide do not really explain why Socrates refused to leave prison, because these arguments do not apply to Socrates himself. Instead, we are to suppose that Socrates remained in prison (after persuading his poor friend Crito that he did so for false reasons) because had he escaped, his moral standing and reputation would have been fatally compromised (351). McPherran, ed., Academic Printing and Publishing, special issue of Apeiron 30: ; Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith Incurable Souls in Socratic Psychology. Ancient Philosophy 22: 1 16; Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith Socrates on Akrasia, Knowledge, and the Power of Appearance. In Akrasia in Greek Philosophy: From Socrates to Plotinus, C. Bobonich and P. Destrée, eds., Leiden and Boston: Brill [Philosophia Antigua series, vol. 106]: 1 17; Marcelo D. Boeri Socrates. Aristotle, and the Stoics on the Apparent and Real Good. In J. J. Cleary and G. M. Gurtler, eds., Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 20: ; Rachel Singpurwalla Reasoning with the Irrational: Moral Psychology in the Protagoras. Ancient Philosophy 26: ; Alejandro Santana Constructivism and the Problem of the Socratic Elenchos. Ancient Philosophy 27: Page 12
6 The final chapter covers Socrates in Later Greek Philosophy, and A. A. Long provides a fine summary and exegesis of the Socratic positions surveyed in Diogenes Laertius s biography of Antisthenes (D.L ), Diogenes the Cynic (D.L , the Stoics, and the Skeptics). I was particularly interested to read of some of the later anti-socratic authors, including students of Aristotle, such as Aristoxenus, who is said to have written a life of Socrates that was more vicious than the accusations of Meletus and Anytus (368). The antipathy of the Epicureans is more widely recognized, which Long characterizes both aptly and piquantly: In their writings, Socrates was portrayed as the complete anti-epicurean a sophist, a rhetorician, a braggart, a skeptic, a credulous purveyor of false theology, in sum a figure whose inconclusive ethical inquiries and neglect of natural science turned human life into chaos (369). Long also includes sections on later responses to the Socratic elenchus, and the daimonion. In sum, although the book has several good chapters, the project as a whole did not seem entirely to jell. The editor s own views as to why we should cease to consider Socrates as a figure in the history of philosophy did not serve the purposes of this collection well at all, and the editor also seems to have allowed several oversights and critical failures by the collected authors to pass unchallenged. If such companion volumes cannot at least pretend to offer topical chapters that are really up-to-date with the current literature and controversies, it is difficult to see them as making any effective contribution. NICHOLAS D. SMITH LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE Page 13
404 Ethics January 2019 I. TOPICS II. METHODOLOGY
404 Ethics January 2019 Kamtekar, Rachana. Plato s Moral Psychology: Intellectualism, the Divided Soul, and the Desire for the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. 240. $55.00 (cloth). I. TOPICS
More informationEdinburgh Research Explorer
Edinburgh Research Explorer Review of Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays Citation for published version: Mason, A 2007, 'Review of Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays' Notre Dame Philosophical
More information4AANA001 Greek Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year 2013/14
4AANA001 Greek Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year 2013/14 Basic information Credits: 15 Module Tutor: Dr Joachim Aufderheide Office: 706 Consultation time: Wednesdays 12-1 Semester: 1 Lecture time and
More information4AANA001 Greek Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year 2014/15
4AANA001 Greek Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year 2014/15 Basic information Credits: 15 Module Tutor: Dr Joachim Aufderheide Office: 706 Consultation time: TBA Semester: 1 Lecture time and venue: Tuesdays
More informationReview of Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith, "Socratic Moral Psychology"
Review of Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith, "Socratic Moral Psychology" The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters
More informationLynchburg College and. Lewis and Clark College
Socratic Moral Psychology Thomas C. Brickhouse Lynchburg College and Nicholas D. Smith Lewis and Clark College Contents Acknowledgments page vi Introduction 1 1 Apology of Socratic studies 11 2 Motivational
More informationSocratic Philosophizing
Socratic Philosophizing David Wolfsdorf Introduction By "Socratic philosophizing" I understand "the manner in which the character Socrates in Plato's early dialogues engages in philosophia." 1 "Philosophia"
More informationCollection and Division in the Philebus
Collection and Division in the Philebus 1 Collection and Division in the Philebus Hugh H. Benson Readers of Aristotle s Posterior Analytics will be familiar with the idea that Aristotle distinguished roughly
More informationPlato and the art of philosophical writing
Plato and the art of philosophical writing Author: Marina McCoy Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/3016 This work is posted on escholarship@bc, Boston College University Libraries. Pre-print version
More informationGovernment 203 Political Theorists and Their Theories: Plato Spring Semester 2010 Clark University
Government 203 Political Theorists and Their Theories: Plato Spring Semester 2010 Clark University Jefferson 400 Friday, 1:25-4:15 Professor Robert Boatright JEF 313A; (508) 793-7632 Office Hours: Wed.
More informationSocratic and Platonic Ethics
Socratic and Platonic Ethics G. J. Mattey Winter, 2017 / Philosophy 1 Ethics and Political Philosophy The first part of the course is a brief survey of important texts in the history of ethics and political
More informationThe Role of Inconsistency in the Death of Socrates 1
The Role of Inconsistency in the Death of Socrates 1 The Role of Inconsistency in the Death of Socrates: An Analysis of Socrates Views on Civil Disobedience and its Implications By Said Saillant This paper
More informationThe Socratic Turn. A Broad Torpedo Fish
The Socratic Turn A Broad Torpedo Fish The Socratic Turn Socrates issues in a new phase of philosophy, issuing in the analytical impulse: He poses a simple, disarming question: What is F-ness? This question
More informationTufts University - Spring Courses 2013 CLS 0084: Greek Political Thought
Course Instructor Monica Berti Department of Classics - 326 Eaton Hall monica.berti@tufts.edu Office Hours Tuesday 12:00-3:00 pm; or by appointment Eaton 326 Textbook CLASSICS 0084: GREEK POLITICAL THOUGHT
More informationJillian Stinchcomb 1 University of Notre Dame
Jillian Stinchcomb 1 Implicit Characterization in Plato s Euthyphro Plato s Euthyphro, like most Socratic dialogues, has one primary question, which is What is piety? It is also similar to many early Socratic
More information(P420-1) Practical Reason in Ancient Greek and Contemporary Philosophy. Spring 2018
(P420-1) Practical Reason in Ancient Greek and Contemporary Philosophy Course Instructor: Spring 2018 NAME Dr Evgenia Mylonaki EMAIL evgenia_mil@hotmail.com; emylonaki@dikemes.edu.gr HOURS AVAILABLE: 12:40
More informationPlato s Rationalistic Method. Hugh H. Benson. (please cite that version)
Plato s Rationalistic Method Hugh H. Benson Published in Blackwell Companion to Rationalism, ed. Alan Nelson (2005), pp. 85-99. (please cite that version) It is a commonplace that the two greatest Greek
More informationTHE UNITY OF COURAGE AND WISDOM IN PLATO S PROTAGORAS LINO BIANCO
THE UNITY OF COURAGE AND WISDOM IN PLATO S PROTAGORAS LINO BIANCO (University of Malta; e-mail: lino.bianco@um.edu.mt) Abstract: The doctrine of the unity of the virtues is one of the themes in Plato s
More informationPLATO AND THE DIVIDED SELF
PLATO AND THE DIVIDED SELF Plato s account of the tripartite soul is a memorable feature of dialogues like the Republic, Phaedrus, andtimaeus:it is one of his most famous and influential yet least understood
More informationIntroduction. Christopher Bobonich
Introduction Christopher Bobonich It is common to begin an article or a book on Plato s Laws with the lament that the Laws has generally been neglected. 1 Although it remains true that the dialogue has
More informationSCOTT BERMAN Department of Philosophy Saint Louis University St. Louis, Missouri (314)
SCOTT BERMAN Department of Philosophy St. Louis, Missouri 63108 (314) 977-3160 bermansj@slu.edu EDUCATION Ph.D. May 1990, Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin- Madison. Fall 1985
More informationAssociate Professor, Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan. Assistant Professor, Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan
Joshua Wilburn Department of Philosophy Wayne State University 5057 Woodward Ave., 12 th Floor Detroit, MI 48202 Phone: (512) 731-1490 Office: (313) 577-6103 Dept. Fax: (313) 577-2077 Email: jwilburn@wayne.edu
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More information(born 470, died 399, Athens) Details about Socrates are derived from three contemporary sources: Besides the dialogues of Plato there are the plays
Plato & Socrates (born 470, died 399, Athens) Details about Socrates are derived from three contemporary sources: Besides the dialogues of Plato there are the plays of Aristophanes and the dialogues of
More informationCity and Soul in Plato s Republic. By G.R.F. Ferrari. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Pp $17.00 (paper). ISBN
174 good cannot be friends does much to illuminate Socratic eudaimonism. The translation of the dialogue is an outstanding work of scholarship. The authors either transliterate the Greek or discuss the
More informationA-LEVEL Classical Civilisation
A-LEVEL Classical Civilisation CIV4A Socrates and Athens Mark scheme 2020 June 2015 Version 1.0: Final Mark Scheme Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with
More informationIntroduction to Ethics Part 2: History of Ethics. SMSU Spring 2005 Professor Douglas F. Olena
Introduction to Ethics Part 2: History of Ethics SMSU Spring 2005 Professor Douglas F. Olena History of Ethics Ethics are conceived as: 1. a general pattern or way of life 2. a set of rules of conduct
More informationIntro to Philosophy, SUM 2011 Benjamin Visscher Hole IV
Intro to Philosophy, SUM 2011 Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Φιλοσοφία Philos + Sophia Love of Wisdom Historical Contemporary Socrates: The unexamined life is not worth living Philosophy is thinking in slow
More informationLecture 4. Athens and the Sophists 15/09/2010. Today s Lecture
Lecture 4 S O C R A T E S & T H E S O P H I S T S Today s Lecture In today's lecture we will: 1. Investigate the historical context that surrounded Socrates during his lifetime 2. Understand who the Sophists
More informationGREAT PHILOSOPHERS series TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN
GREAT PHILOSOPHERS series TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN 1. 26/09 SOCRATES Damien Storey 2. 03/10 PLOTINUS Vasilis Politis 3. 10/10 AUGUSTINE Paul O Grady 4. 17/10 M. CAVENDISH Kenny Pearce 5. 24/10 SPINOZA Jim
More informationShanghai Jiao Tong University. PI913 History of Ancient Greek Philosophy
Shanghai Jiao Tong University PI913 History of Ancient Greek Philosophy Instructor: Juan De Pascuale Email: depascualej@kenyon.edu Instructor s Home Institution: Office Hours: Kenyon College Office: Term:
More informationSOCRATES, PIETY, AND NOMINALISM. love is one of the most well known in the history of philosophy. Yet some fundamental
GEORGE RUDEBUSCH SOCRATES, PIETY, AND NOMINALISM INTRODUCTION The argument used by Socrates to refute the thesis that piety is what all the gods love is one of the most well known in the history of philosophy.
More information4AANA001 Greek Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year 2015/16
School of Arts & Humanities Department of Philosophy 4AANA001 Greek Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year 2015/16 Basic information Credits: 15 Module Tutor: Dr Tamsin de Waal Office: Rm 702 Consultation
More informationproper construal of Davidson s principle of rationality will show the objection to be misguided. Andrew Wong Washington University, St.
Do e s An o m a l o u s Mo n i s m Hav e Explanatory Force? Andrew Wong Washington University, St. Louis The aim of this paper is to support Donald Davidson s Anomalous Monism 1 as an account of law-governed
More informationShanghai Jiao Tong University. PI913 History of Ancient Greek Philosophy
Shanghai Jiao Tong University PI913 History of Ancient Greek Philosophy Instructor: Juan De Pascuale Email: depascualej@kenyon.edu Home Institution: Office Hours: Kenyon College Office: 505 Main Bldg Term:
More informationSentence Starters from They Say, I Say
Sentence Starters from They Say, I Say Introducing What They Say A number of have recently suggested that. It has become common today to dismiss. In their recent work, Y and Z have offered harsh critiques
More informationShanghai Jiao Tong University. History of Ancient Greek Philosophy
Shanghai Jiao Tong University History of Ancient Greek Philosophy Instructor: Juan De Pascuale Email: depascualej@kenyon.edu Instructor s Home Institution: Kenyon College Office: Office Hours: TBD Term:
More informationTemplates for Research Paper
Templates for Research Paper Templates for introducing what they say A number of have recently suggested that. It has become common today to dismiss. In their recent work, have offered harsh critiques
More informationIntroduction. pursuing of truth if not right, there are many questions that do arise and need answers in
Jones 1 Catherine Jones Dr. V. Robson Philosophy 17 October 2012 Was Socrates an Enemy of the State? Introduction As philosophy records, the contribution of Socrates to address elements of justice in pursuing
More informationRECENT WORK THE MINIMAL DEFINITION AND METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY: A REPORT FROM A CONFERENCE STEPHEN C. ANGLE
Comparative Philosophy Volume 1, No. 1 (2010): 106-110 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org RECENT WORK THE MINIMAL DEFINITION AND METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY: A REPORT
More informationALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI
ALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI Michael HUEMER ABSTRACT: I address Moti Mizrahi s objections to my use of the Self-Defeat Argument for Phenomenal Conservatism (PC). Mizrahi contends
More informationAppendix: Socrates. Shanyu Ji. July 15, 2013
Appendix: Socrates Shanyu Ji July 15, 2013 Socrates life Socrates, 470-399 BC, was the wisest philosopher of his time. He was the first of the three great teachers of ancient Greece (the other two: Plato
More informationCare of the Soul: Service-Learning and the Value of the Humanities
[Expositions 2.1 (2008) 007 012] Expositions (print) ISSN 1747-5368 doi:10.1558/expo.v2i1.007 Expositions (online) ISSN 1747-5376 Care of the Soul: Service-Learning and the Value of the Humanities James
More informationPROPOSED IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SOCRATES' METHOD OF EXAMINATION
PROPOSED IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SOCRATES' METHOD OF EXAMINATION A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements for the Degree of Master of Education in the University of Canterbury.
More informationPHIL University of New Orleans. Clarence Mark Phillips University of New Orleans. University of New Orleans Syllabi.
University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Syllabi Fall 2015 PHIL 1000 Clarence Mark Phillips University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uno.edu/syllabi
More informationThe Trials Of Socrates Six Classic Texts Book Library
We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with the trials of socrates
More informationLODGE VEGAS # 32 ON EDUCATION
Wisdom First published Mon Jan 8, 2007 LODGE VEGAS # 32 ON EDUCATION The word philosophy means love of wisdom. What is wisdom? What is this thing that philosophers love? Some of the systematic philosophers
More informationText 1: Philosophers and the Pursuit of Wisdom. Topic 5: Ancient Greece Lesson 3: Greek Thinkers, Artists, and Writers
Text 1: Philosophers and the Pursuit of Wisdom Topic 5: Ancient Greece Lesson 3: Greek Thinkers, Artists, and Writers OBJECTIVES Identify the men responsible for the philosophy movement in Greece Discuss
More informationOne previous course in philosophy, or the permission of the instructor.
ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY Philosophy 347C = Classics 347C = Religious Studies 356C Fall 2005 Mondays-Wednesdays-Fridays, 2:00-3:00 Busch 211 Description This course examines the high-water marks of philosophy
More informationSocrates. Already well known by 423 (Arist. Clouds)
Socrates and Plato Socrates ca. 470 399 BC. Son of Sophroniscus and Phaenarete Not an aristocrat: mother was a midwife, father a stone mason Potidaea (432); Delium (424) Self taught Sought wisdom through
More informationMetaphysics and Epistemology
Metaphysics and Epistemology (born 470, died 399, Athens) Details about Socrates are derived from three contemporary sources: Besides the dialogues of Plato there are the plays of Aristophanes and the
More informationSophie s World. Chapter 4 The Natural Philosophers
Sophie s World Chapter 4 The Natural Philosophers Arche Is there a basic substance that everything else is made of? Greek word with primary senses beginning, origin, or source of action Early philosophers
More informationReasoning with the Irrational: Moral Psychology in the Protagoras. Rachel Singpurwalla
Reasoning with the Irrational: Moral Psychology in the Protagoras Rachel Singpurwalla We all, on occasion, experience motivational conflict and weakness of the will. When we diet, we desire to eat sweets,
More informationOverview Plato Socrates Phaedo Summary. Plato: Phaedo Jan. 31 Feb. 5, 2014
Plato: Phaedo Jan. 31 Feb. 5, 2014 Quiz 1 1 Where does the discussion between Socrates and his students take place? A. At Socrates s home. B. In Plato s Academia. C. In prison. D. On a ship. 2 What happens
More informationDominican School of Philosophy and Theology PH/HS 1050 History of Philosophy: Ancient
Dominican School of Philosophy and Theology PH/HS 1050 History of Philosophy: Ancient Fall, 2015 Instructor: Professor Eugene M. Ludwig, O.F.M. Cap. Office: DSPT 202 Office Hours: Mondays, 1:15-3:15 or
More informationMarcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC. Introduction
RBL 09/2004 Collins, C. John Science & Faith: Friends or Foe? Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 2003. Pp. 448. Paper. $25.00. ISBN 1581344309. Marcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC
More informationBefore the Court House
Euthyphro Before the Court House Socrates: the charges Corrupting the young Introducing new gods Euthyphro Prosecuting his father for murder Relative or a stranger? Makes no difference: pollution (miasma)
More informationReasoning with the Irrational: Moral Psychology in the Protagoras
Ancient Philosophy 26 (2006) Mathesis Publications 243 Articles Reasoning with the Irrational: Moral Psychology in the Protagoras Rachel Singpurwalla We all, on occasion, experience motivational conflict
More informationA Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke
A Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke Roghieh Tamimi and R. P. Singh Center for philosophy, Social Science School, Jawaharlal Nehru University,
More informationRachel Singpurwalla. Philosophy Department University of Maryland College Park, MD
Rachel Singpurwalla Philosophy Department University of Maryland College Park, MD 20740 rgks@umd.edu Appointments 2015-present: Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Maryland 2007-2015: Assistant
More informationWhat is Freedom? Should Socrates be Set Free? Plato s Crito
What is Freedom? Should Socrates be Set Free? Plato s Crito Quick Review of the Apology SGD of DQs Side 1: Questions 1 through 3 / Side 2: Questions 4 through 6 What is the major / provocative takeaway?
More informationThe Priority of Definition. Continuum Companion to Socrates Edd. Bussanich and Smith. Hugh H. Benson
The Priority of Definition Continuum Companion to Socrates Edd. Bussanich and Smith Hugh H. Benson Introduction One thing we seem to know about Socrates 1 is that he was preocuppied with questions of the
More informationCurriculum Vitae: Dr. Scott LaBarge (current as of 7/2012)
Contact Information Department of Philosophy Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053 (408)554-4846 (FAX) (408)551-1839 slabarge@scu.edu Employment Curriculum Vitae: Dr. Scott LaBarge
More informationPlato's Introduction of Forms (review)
Plato's Introduction of Forms (review) Lloyd P. Gerson Mouseion: Journal of the Classical Association of Canada, Volume 7, Number 1, 2007, LI Series III, pp. 83-87 (Review) Published by University of Toronto
More informationW E D N E S D AY, M A R C H 9,
MORALIT Y IN REPUBLIC II W E D N E S D AY, M A R C H 9, 2 0 1 6 INTRODUCING MORAL PHILOSOPHY Ancient Greek philosophy begins with what are largely epistemic and practical scientific concerns about the
More informationCambridge University Press Real Ethics: Reconsidering the Foundations of Morality John M. Rist Frontmatter More information
REAL ETHICS John Rist surveys the history of ethics from Plato to the present and offers a vigorous defence of an ethical theory based on a revised version of Platonic realism. In a wide-ranging discussion
More informationCHRISTOPHER ROWE S PLATO AND THE ART OF PHILOSOPHICAL WRITING
JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: SESS: OUTPUT: Tue Jul ::0 00 SUM: FDA /v0/blackwell/journals/phib_v0_i/phib_ 0 0 0 Philosophical Books Vol. 0 No. January 00 pp. CHRISTOPHER ROWE S PLATO AND THE ART OF PHILOSOPHICAL
More informationV , Collegiate Honors Seminar: Socrates and his Critics. Tuesdays & Thursdays... 2:00 p.m. 3:15 p.m...19 University Place, room 228
Spring 2007 V28.0138.001, Collegiate Honors Seminar: Socrates and his Critics uesdays & hursdays... 2:00 p.m. 3:15 p.m...19 University Place, room 228 Professor Vincent Renzi 903C Silver Center 212 998
More informationSocrates is the quintessential watershed of ancient thought. He is
Socrates Mission Daniel W. Graham Socrates is the quintessential watershed of ancient thought. He is known as the thinker who turned philosophy away from cosmological speculation to ethics and value theory.
More informationTHEY SAY: Discussing what the sources are saying
School of Liberal Arts University Writing Center Because writers need readers Cavanaugh Hall 427 University Library 2125 (317)274-2049 (317)278-8171 www.iupui.edu/~uwc Academic Conversation Templates:
More informationTB_02_01_Socrates: A Model for Humanity, Remember, LO_2.1
Chapter 2 What is the Philosopher s Way? Socrates and the Examined Life CHAPTER SUMMARY The Western tradition in philosophy is mainly owed to the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greek philosophers of record began
More informationPHL 200Y Teaching Assistants:
PHL 200Y 2015-2016 Instructor: L.P. Gerson (lloyd.gerson@utoronto.ca) Classroom: LM 159 Office: JHB 423. 647 992 4880 Office Hours: M12-1, W12-1 and by appointment Course website: Blackboard: https://portal.utoronto.ca/
More informationMark Schroeder. Slaves of the Passions. Melissa Barry Hume Studies Volume 36, Number 2 (2010), 225-228. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES Terms and Conditions
More information4AANA001 Greek Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year 2016/17
School of Arts & Humanities Department of Philosophy 4AANA001 Greek Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year 2016/17 Basic information Credits: 15 Module Tutor: Dr Tamsin de Waal Office: Rm 702 Consultation
More informationAncient Studies History Unit 5 TRIAL OF SOCRATES
Student Name: Unit 5 TRIAL OF SOCRATES Due Date Reading Topic S 11/12 A&S 59-62 Biography of Socrates Video - In Class: PBS III- Empire of the Mind Search for a Scapegoat & Trial of Socrates (39:50-55:00)
More informationA Problem in Platoʼs Hagiography of Socrates
Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts - Volume 5, Issue 1 Pages 81-104 A Problem in Platoʼs Hagiography of Socrates By Nicholas D. Smith The problem for Platoʼs hagiography of Socrates can be stated as a
More informationELEONORE STUMP PENELHUM ON SKEPTICS AND FIDEISTS
ELEONORE STUMP PENELHUM ON SKEPTICS AND FIDEISTS ABSTRACT. Professor Penelhum has argued that there is a common error about the history of skepticism and that the exposure of this error would significantly
More informationChoosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly *
Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly * Ralph Wedgwood 1 Two views of practical reason Suppose that you are faced with several different options (that is, several ways in which you might act in a
More informationTwo Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory
Western University Scholarship@Western 2015 Undergraduate Awards The Undergraduate Awards 2015 Two Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory David Hakim Western University, davidhakim266@gmail.com
More informationDoes the Third Man Argument refute the theory of forms?
Does the Third Man Argument refute the theory of forms? Fine [1993] recognises four versions of the Third Man Argument (TMA). However, she argues persuasively that these are similar arguments with similar
More informationSpinoza, the No Shared Attribute thesis, and the
Spinoza, the No Shared Attribute thesis, and the Principle of Sufficient Reason * Daniel Whiting This is a pre-print of an article whose final and definitive form is due to be published in the British
More informationPROSPECTS FOR A JAMESIAN EXPRESSIVISM 1 JEFF KASSER
PROSPECTS FOR A JAMESIAN EXPRESSIVISM 1 JEFF KASSER In order to take advantage of Michael Slater s presence as commentator, I want to display, as efficiently as I am able, some major similarities and differences
More informationAncient Studies History Unit 6 APOLOGY OF SOCRATES
Student Name: Unit 6 APOLOGY OF SOCRATES Due Date Reading Topic S 11/14 WW 99-106 Plato: The Apology of Socrates - I M 11/16 WW 106-112 Plato: The Apology of Socrates - II T 11/17 WW 112-118 Plato: The
More informationA lonelier contractualism A. J. Julius, UCLA, January
A lonelier contractualism A. J. Julius, UCLA, January 15 2008 1. A definition A theory of some normative domain is contractualist if, having said what it is for a person to accept a principle in that domain,
More informationPlato & Socrates. Plato ( B.C.E.) was the student of Socrates ( B.C.E.) and the founder of the Academy in Athens.
"The dying Socrates. I admire the courage and wisdom of Socrates in everything he did, said and did not say. This mocking and enamored monster and pied piper of Athens, who made the most overweening youths
More informationChapter 2 Human Nature
True / False 1. Freud wrote Civilization and Its Discontents. 2. Hobbes believed that humans were altruistic. ANSWER: False 3. J. J. C. Smart argued that states of consciousness are identical with states
More informationIs the Existence of Heaven Compatible with the Existence of Hell? James Cain
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Southwest Philosophy Review, July 2002, pp. 153-58. Is the Existence of Heaven Compatible with the Existence of Hell?
More informationReading Euthyphro Plato as a literary artist
The objectives of studying the Euthyphro Reading Euthyphro The main objective is to learn what the method of philosophy is through the method Socrates used. The secondary objectives are (1) to be acquainted
More informationAgreat trouble for lovers of Socrates is the fact that one of the
Aporia Vol. 15 number 1 2005 Obedience to the State in the Crito and the Apology KYLE DINGMAN Agreat trouble for lovers of Socrates is the fact that one of the central claims espoused in the Crito the
More information2.0 OBJECTIVES 2.1 INTRODUCTION. Contents
Ancient Greek Philosophy UNIT 2 Contents 2.0 Objectives SOCRATES 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The Socratic Dialectical Method 2.3 Systematic Divisions of Socrates Philosophy 2.4 The Educational Philosophy of Socrates
More informationNote: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is
The Flicker of Freedom: A Reply to Stump Note: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is scheduled to appear in an upcoming issue The Journal of Ethics. That
More informationReading the Nichomachean Ethics
1 Reading the Nichomachean Ethics Book I: Chapter 1: Good as the aim of action Every art, applied science, systematic investigation, action and choice aims at some good: either an activity, or a product
More informationReason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke,
Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Pp. 208. Price 60.) In this interesting book, Ted Poston delivers an original and
More informationTHE PLATONIC ART OF PHILOSOPHY
THE PLATONIC ART OF PHILOSOPHY This is a collection of essays written by leading experts in honour of Christopher Rowe, and inspired by his groundbreaking work in the exegesis of Plato. The authors represent
More informationAre There Moral Facts
Are There Moral Facts Birkbeck Philosophy Study Guide 2016 Are There Moral Facts? Dr. Cristian Constantinescu & Prof. Hallvard Lillehammer Department of Philosophy, Birkbeck College This Study Guide is
More informationPlato BCE Republic, ca BCE
Plato 429-347 BCE Republic, ca 370-60 BCE First Impressions 2 3 What sort of text is this?! a novel? who is speaking? (Plato? Socrates?) is it possible for any of the characters in dialogue to disagree
More informationThe Colorado report: beyond the cheerleading
The Colorado report: beyond the cheerleading As I presume everyone has heard by now, the American Philosophical Association s Committee for the Status of Women was recently invited to send a site visit
More informationLove and Duty. Philosophic Exchange. Julia Driver Washington University, St. Louis, Volume 44 Number 1 Volume 44 (2014)
Philosophic Exchange Volume 44 Number 1 Volume 44 (2014) Article 1 2014 Love and Duty Julia Driver Washington University, St. Louis, jdriver@artsci.wutsl.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/phil_ex
More informationcambridge critical guides Titles published in this series:
ARISTOTLE S POLITICS Arguably the foundational text of Western political theory, Aristotle s Politics has become one of the most widely and carefully studied works in ethical and political philosophy.
More information