Introductory Matters
|
|
- Lambert Beasley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 Introductory Matters The readings in this section take up some topics that set the stage for discussion to follow. The first addresses the value of philosophy, the second the nature of truth, and the third the nature of good reasoning. Russell s piece on the value of philosophy should help give us a picture of what we can hope for out of the philosophical discussions to follow. My short paper on truth should illuminate what is at issue in debates about various claims. And the discussion of reasoning should help us go about our philosophical arguing in constructive ways. But this material is not a mere prelude to serious philosophical discussion. As the readings on truth and good reasoning suggest, the nature of truth and of good reasoning are themselves topics of serious philosophical debate. Our goal will not be to decide the debates about truth and reasoning. But we will want to understand enough about the issues surrounding truth and reasoning to see something of the qualifications and lack thereof which must be placed on further discussion.
2 43 The Problem of Evil Though evil is certainly a problem, the philosophical problem of evil is a problem for theistic religious belief that is, for belief in an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good god. In its simplest form, the problem may be represented as follows: 1. If there is an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good god, then there is no evil. 2. There is evil. 3. There is no omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good god. The argument is deductively valid. And, in typical cases, theists accept that there is evil indeed, the point of many religious beliefs and practices has to do with responses to evil. So most controversy surrounds premise (1). The readings in this section divide into two groups. First, Gyekye introduces, from a non- Western perspective, many topics that will arise in later discussion. The problem is more than a narrowly Western issue! Rowe s piece is another general and accessible introduction. The latter two readings, by Mackie and Plantinga, interact directly with one another. Mackie argues that the problem is real: the argument is sufficient to show that there is no omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good god. Plantinga responds directly to Mackie s reasoning, advocating a version of the Free Will defense. You will want to think about which is right or, maybe, whether neither succeeds in establishing his point!
3 83 The Kal m Cosmological Argument. The cosmological argument (from the greek for world or universe ) comes in different forms. In each case, the idea is to move from the existence of the world to the conclusion that there is a creator. The kal m version of the argument, is based on the impossibility of an infinite past, and was advocated especially by Arabic philosophers in the late Middle Ages. In recent years, it has been defended vigorously by William Lane Craig. As presented by Craig, the basic argument is as follows: 1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence. 2. The universe began to exist. 3. The universe has a cause of its existence. The argument is deductively valid. Our discussion focuses almost exclusively on the second premise and on just one of Craig s main arguments for it. With just this much, there will be complications enough! And we should be able to get a good taste of the kind of reasonings that are involved. The readings trace a sort of trail or sequence : The first selection, by Craig, sets up the basic terms of the argument. In the second selection, we get a medieval defense of the second premise based on the absurdity of an infinite past. A simplified version of this argument is as follows. 1. Nothing is greater than infinitely big. 2. A whole is greater than its proper parts. 3. The totality of time elapsed up to now is a proper part of that which will have been elapsed after now. 4. The totality of time elapsed up to now is not infinite. With second and third premises, assuming that the totality time elapsed up to now is infinite leads to the conclusion that it will be greater than infinite in a moment which contradicts the first premise. But many have thought this reasoning is discredited by the treatment of infinity in contemporary mathematics, on which both the first and second premises are called into question. Thus the third selection, by Maor, introduces the contemporary approach to infinity. The final two selections develop Craig s attempt to sustain the argument in the face of these objections.
4 112 Divine Command Ethics On a divine command ethical theory, an action is wrong if and only if it violates a command of god. Indeed, it is sometimes suggested that moral notions are somehow senseless without god that without god, all things are permitted. Say we grant that god introduces certain motivation and/or enforcement for moral values. Still, there is room to question the divine command theory. In one of the great moments in Plato s dialogues, in Euthyphro, Socrates sets up a dilemma which may be represented as follows: DCT: An act is wrong iff it violates a command of god. Wrong is arbitrary; any act could be wrong There is an external criterion for wongness Socrates asks us to consider whether god commands a thing because it is wrong, or whether it is wrong because god commands it. Suppose god commands a thing because it is wrong (the right-hand option): Then god seems cast into a merely advisory or enforcement role it is not god, but some other factor, determining the wrong. Suppose a thing is wrong just because of god s command (the left-hand option): Then it seems that any acts could be right or wrong depending on god s commands: If it is possible for god to command the torture of innocent children, it is possible for it to be morally right to torture them. But if moral facts are not changeable in this way, if it cannot be right to torture, then this left option does not seem correct either. And if neither option is correct, we have a serious objection to the DCT. (Observe that the last objection does not say that god has commanded the unthinkable or that he would, only that he could.) Our readings form a sort of dialogue on this question. The initial readings, by Plato and Hudson, set up the divine command theory, and develop traditional objections to it. In the next selection, Robert Adams proposes a modified divine command theory intended to avoid the objections. In the fourth selection, John Chandler argues that the traditional objections continue to apply to Adams s modified theory in modified form. Finally, I suggest that these debates focus more on a symptom, than the cause of difficulty and, in the last selection, propose a theory which I think goes more directly at the cause. Of course, my theory may have problems of its own!
5 158 Pascal s Wager Pascal proposes that the way to decide whether or not to believe in god is to discover whether belief or disbelief is the better bet, and bet accordingly. You win if the view you bet on is true. Pascal writes within a particular Christian tradition, and some aspects of his presentation are tied to that tradition. However, it is possible to consider his argument without that emphasis. Setting aside the possibility of infinite loss, let an r-view be any view offering infinite gain that has probability > 0; let an a-view be any view not offering infinite gain that has probability > 0; and let a d-view be any view whose probability is 0. We argue that a bet on an r-view more rational than a bet on an a- or d-view. 1. One must bet either for some r-view, a-view or d-view. 2. The expected utility of bets on arbitrary r-views, a-views, and d-views are, EU(r) = prob(r)(infinite gain) + prob(not-r)(finite loss) = infinite gain EU(a) = prob(a)(finite gain) + prob(not-a)(finite loss) = finite gain/loss EU(d) = 0(some gain) + 1(finite loss) = finite loss 3. If one must bet, it is rational to take a bet with highest expected utility. 4. It is rational to bet on some r-view, rather than on any a-view or d-view. So the conclusion of this version of the argument is that it is rational to be religious rather than not (or rather to bet on an r-view where this is any view with a chance of being true and a promise of infinite gain). Note that we do not defend any particular religion. The second premise is based on ordinary betting considerations: The expected utility of a bet is equal to the probability of a win times the payoff of a win, plus the probability of a loss times the payoff of a loss. Thus, e.g., for a $.50 bet on a single roll of a die, suppose I am offered a $5 payoff for a bet on six. Then I may reason as follows: My net gain for a win is 4.50, and loss is.50. My expected utility is the probability of a win times the gain of a win, plus the probability of a loss times gain of a loss, where this is, (1/6)(4.50) + (5/6)(-.50) = 1/3. So I expect an average gain of.33/roll and take this bet as often as I can! Here s another way to see the point: In any six rolls, I expect to win once (and so to gain 4.50), and to lose 5 times (and so to lose 2.50), so I expect to come out ahead by $2.00 the same as at 1/3 per roll over 6 rolls. Given this, the basic idea of the Wager is clear: So long as the probability of a win is nonzero, the expected utility of a bet on god is sure to be huge. It s related reasoning on the loss side which motivates people to buy insurance. Of course, this isn t the end of the matter. But it should help you to see what is at issue!
The Problem of Evil. Prof. Eden Lin The Ohio State University
The Problem of Evil Prof. Eden Lin The Ohio State University Where We Are You have considered some questions about the nature of God: What does it mean for God to be omnipotent? Does God s omniscience
More informationAquinas Cosmological argument in everyday language
Aquinas Cosmological argument in everyday language P1. If there is no first cause, there cannot be any effects. P2. But we have observed that there are effects, like observing change in the world. C: So
More informationDivine command theory
Divine command theory Today we will be discussing divine command theory. But first I will give a (very) brief overview of the discipline of philosophy. Why do this? One of the functions of an introductory
More informationPHIL Philosophy of Religion
PHIL 3600 - Philosophy of Religion Tentative Course Outline 1. The Nature of God 2. Problems Concerning Omnipotence 3. God and Morality 4. The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge 5. Arguments for the
More informationMoral Argument. Theistic Arguments: The Craig Program, 4. Edwin Chong. God makes sense of the objective moral values in the world.
Theistic Arguments: The Craig Program, 4 Edwin Chong March 13, 2005 Moral Argument God makes sense of the objective moral values in the world. March 2005 2 1 The Argument If God does not exist, objective
More informationPhilosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Summer, 2016 Section 4173, Online Course
Philosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Summer, 2016 Section 4173, Online Course Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu Office: SOCS 108 Office
More informationAssessment: Student accomplishment of expected student outcomes will be assessed using the following measures
Philosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Spring, 2017 Section 4160, Online Course Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu Office: SOCS 108 Office
More informationThe Goodness of God in the Judaeo-Christian Tradition
The Goodness of God in the Judaeo-Christian Tradition (Please note: These are rough notes for a lecture, mostly taken from the relevant sections of Philosophy and Ethics and other publications and should
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationCosmological Argument
Theistic Arguments: The Craig Program, 2 Edwin Chong February 27, 2005 Cosmological Argument God makes sense of the origin of the universe. Kalam cosmological argument. [Craig 1979] Kalam: An Arabic term
More informationThe free will defense
The free will defense Last time we began discussing the central argument against the existence of God, which I presented as the following reductio ad absurdum of the proposition that God exists: 1. God
More information= (value of LEAVE if rain x chance of rain) + (value of LEAVE if dry x chance of dry) = -20 x x.5 = -9
3. PASCAL S WAGER Suppose you are facing a decision under conditions of uncertainty : say, whether to take an umbrella or not, on a day when the chance of rain is one half. e value of taking as opposed
More informationPhilosophy 1100: Ethics
Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 3 - Religious Approaches to Ethics 1.Religion and Morality 2.Divine Command Theory (DCT) 3.DCT and Atheism 4.Why believe DCT? 5.Plato 6.Euthyphro 7.An Argument against DCT:
More informationIntroduction to Deductive and Inductive Thinking 2017
Topic 1: READING AND INTERVENING by Ian Hawkins. Introductory i The Philosophy of Natural Science 1. CONCEPTS OF REALITY? 1.1 What? 1.2 How? 1.3 Why? 1.4 Understand various views. 4. Reality comprises
More informationWho or what is God?, asks John Hick (Hick 2009). A theist might answer: God is an infinite person, or at least an
John Hick on whether God could be an infinite person Daniel Howard-Snyder Western Washington University Abstract: "Who or what is God?," asks John Hick. A theist might answer: God is an infinite person,
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 5d God
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 5d God No clickers today. 2 quizzes Wednesday. Don t be late or you will miss the first one! Turn in your Nammour summaries today. No credit for late ones. According to
More informationPL-101: Introduction to Philosophy Fall of 2007, Juniata College Instructor: Xinli Wang
1 PL-101: Introduction to Philosophy Fall of 2007, Juniata College Instructor: Xinli Wang Office: Good Hall 414 Phone: X-3642 Office Hours: MWF 10-11 am Email: Wang@juniata.edu Texts Required: 1. Christopher
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationThe Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will
Stance Volume 3 April 2010 The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will ABSTRACT: I examine Leibniz s version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason with respect to free will, paying particular attention
More informationPH 501 Introduction to Philosophy of Religion
Asbury Theological Seminary eplace: preserving, learning, and creative exchange Syllabi ecommons 1-1-2008 PH 501 Introduction to Philosophy of Religion Joseph B. Onyango Okello Follow this and additional
More informationPhilosophy 100: Problems of Philosophy (Honors) (Spring 2014)
Philosophy 100: Problems of Philosophy (Honors) (Spring 2014) Armstrong Hall 306; MWF 10:30 11:20 AM Instructor: Geoff Georgi (gbgeorgi@mix.wvu.edu) Office Hours: T 2:30 4:00 PM, W 3:30 5:00 PM, and by
More informationCritique of Cosmological Argument
David Hume: Critique of Cosmological Argument Critique of Cosmological Argument DAVID HUME (1711-1776) David Hume is one of the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Born in Edinburgh,
More informationReasons Community. May 7, 2017
Reasons Community May 7, 2017 Welcome to Reasons! May 7, 2017 Join us as we examine apologetics, worldview, science and faith topics through thought-provoking teaching, lively discussion, and a variety
More informationThe Kalam Cosmological Argument
The Existence of God The Kalam Cosmological Argument Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Southern Evangelical Seminary Past President, International Society of Christian Apologetics The Kalam Cosmological
More information2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.
Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 October 25 & 27, 2016 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Schedule see syllabus as well! B. Questions? II. Refutation A. Arguments are typically used to establish conclusions.
More informationThe Kalam Cosmological Argument provides no support for theism
The Kalam Cosmological Argument provides no support for theism 0) Introduction 1) A contradiction follows from William Lane Craig's position 2) A tensed theory of time entails that it's not the case that
More informationIs the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible?
Is the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible? Anders Kraal ABSTRACT: Since the 1960s an increasing number of philosophers have endorsed the thesis that there can be no such thing as
More informationToday s Lecture. Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie
Today s Lecture Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie Preliminary comments: A problem with evil The Problem of Evil traditionally understood must presume some or all of the following:
More informationThe Divine Command Theory
University of Denver From the SelectedWorks of Corey A Ciocchetti 2007 The Divine Command Theory Corey A Ciocchetti, University of Denver Available at: https://works.bepress.com/corey_ciocchetti/13/ The
More informationThe Paradox of the stone and two concepts of omnipotence
Filo Sofija Nr 30 (2015/3), s. 239-246 ISSN 1642-3267 Jacek Wojtysiak John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin The Paradox of the stone and two concepts of omnipotence Introduction The history of science
More informationPLANTINGA ON THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. Hugh LAFoLLETTE East Tennessee State University
PLANTINGA ON THE FREE WILL DEFENSE Hugh LAFoLLETTE East Tennessee State University I In his recent book God, Freedom, and Evil, Alvin Plantinga formulates an updated version of the Free Will Defense which,
More informationC. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities
Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 March 19 & 24, 2015 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Roll B. Schedule C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know D. Discussion
More informationForeknowledge, evil, and compatibility arguments
Foreknowledge, evil, and compatibility arguments Jeff Speaks January 25, 2011 1 Warfield s argument for compatibilism................................ 1 2 Why the argument fails to show that free will and
More information5 A Modal Version of the
5 A Modal Version of the Ontological Argument E. J. L O W E Moreland, J. P.; Sweis, Khaldoun A.; Meister, Chad V., Jul 01, 2013, Debating Christian Theism The original version of the ontological argument
More informationPhilosophical Approaches to Religion
Philosophical Approaches to Religion Prof. Jeffrey Dunn Spring 2009 MWF 12:20-1:10 Bartlett 206 UMass, Amherst Office: Office Hours: Email: Homepage: 367 Bartlett Th 10-11, by appt. jdunn@philos.umass.edu
More informationThe Grounding for Moral Obligation
Bradley 1 The Grounding for Moral Obligation Cody Bradley Ethics from a Global Perspective, T/R at 7:00PM Dr. James Grindeland February 27, 2014 Bradley 2 The aim of this paper is to provide a coherent,
More informationWHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?
WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL? Beliefs don t trump facts in the real world. People almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.
More informationETHICS AND RELIGION. Prof. Dr. John Edmund Hare
Ethics and Religion 49 Prof. Dr. John Edmund Hare ETHICS AND RELIGION The topic for today is three ways in which we can establish the dependence of morality upon religion. I will give these three ways
More informationEXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES
1 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES Exercises From the Text 1) In the text, we diagrammed Example 7 as follows: Whatever you do, don t vote for Joan! An action is ethical only if it stems from the right
More informationPhilosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Spring, 2017 Section 2664, Room SOCS 205, MW 11:15am-12:40pm
Philosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Spring, 2017 Section 2664, Room SOCS 205, MW 11:15am-12:40pm Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu
More information2014 THE BIBLIOGRAPHIA ISSN: Online First: 21 October 2014
PROBABILITY IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION. Edited by Jake Chandler & Victoria S. Harrison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Pp. 272. Hard Cover 42, ISBN: 978-0-19-960476-0. IN ADDITION TO AN INTRODUCTORY
More informationPHIL 011: Introduction to Philosophy
General Information PHIL 011: Introduction to Philosophy Term: 2018 Summer Session Class Sessions Per Week: 5 Instructor: Staff Total Weeks: 4 Language of Instruction: English Total Class Sessions: 20
More informationCOSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT: A PRAGMATIC DEFENSE
127 COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT: A PRAGMATIC DEFENSE EVAN SANDSMARK & JASON L. MEGILL University of Colorado Old Dominion University Abstract. We formulate a sort of generic Cosmological argument, i.e., a Cosmological
More informationEngaging Moderns & Postmoderns. Engaging Moderns. The Fine-Tuning Argument. The Fine-Tuning Argument. The Fine-Tuning Argument
Engaging Moderns & Postmoderns Engaging Moderns Douglas Blount Georgetown Southern Baptist Church For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. Ever since the creation
More informationSubject Overview Curriculum pathway
Subject Overview Curriculum pathway Course Summary Edexcel AS Level Religious Studies Unit / Module AS UNIT 1 Foundations AS UNIT 2 Investigations A2 UNIT 3 A2 UNIT 4 - Implications The Cosmological Argument
More informationXi an Jiaotong University
General Information: Xi an Jiaotong University School of Management Course Code: PHIL 011 Course Name: Introduction to Philosophy Term: 2018 Summer Session Instructor: Staff Class Sessions Per Week: 5
More informationWhat should I believe? Only what I have evidence for.
What should I believe? Only what I have evidence for. We closed last time by considering an objection to Moore s proof of an external world. The objection was that Moore does not know the premises of his
More informationTWO NO, THREE DOGMAS OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY
1 TWO NO, THREE DOGMAS OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY 1.0 Introduction. John Mackie argued that God's perfect goodness is incompatible with his failing to actualize the best world that he can actualize. And
More informationPhilosophy of Religion. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Religion Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationPHIL 100 AO1 Introduction to Philosophy
1 PHIL 100 AO1 Introduction to Philosophy Mondays & Thursdays 4:30-5:50 Engineering/Computer Science Building (ECS) 116 First Term Bob Wright Centre (BWC) A104 Second Term Instructor: Klaus Jahn Office:
More information175 Chapter CHAPTER 23: Probability
75 Chapter 23 75 CHAPTER 23: Probability According to the doctrine of chance, you ought to put yourself to the trouble of searching for the truth; for if you die without worshipping the True Cause, you
More informationWhence Evil? M. Andorf. Presented to the Fermi Society of Philosophy. December
Whence Evil? M. Andorf Presented to the Fermi Society of Philosophy. December 8 2017. Motivation In our meetings we frequently bring up the idea of beauty. As physicists we delight in the elegance of the
More informationNEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK DIVISION OF LIBERAL ARTS AND GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK DIVISION OF LIBERAL ARTS AND GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES PHIL3209/PH209: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION (formerly HU309)
More informationAquinas s Third Way Keith Burgess-Jackson 24 September 2017
Aquinas s Third Way Keith Burgess-Jackson 24 September 2017 Cosmology, a branch of astronomy (or astrophysics), is The study of the origin and structure of the universe. 1 Thus, a thing is cosmological
More informationWilliam Clifford and William James on sufficient evidence for belief
William Clifford and William James on sufficient evidence for belief William K. Clifford (1845-1879) An English mathematician and philosopher, he lived during the Victorian Era He was the son of a justice
More informationDoes God exist? The argument from evil
Does God exist? The argument from evil One of the oldest, and most important, arguments against the existence of God tries to show that the idea that God is all-powerful and all-good contradicts a very
More informationChapter Six. Putnam's Anti-Realism
119 Chapter Six Putnam's Anti-Realism So far, our discussion has been guided by the assumption that there is a world and that sentences are true or false by virtue of the way it is. But this assumption
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALGARY. Philosophy 331 Fall 2008 Philosophy of Religion
UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY 1 Philosophy 331 Fall 2008 Philosophy of Religion Professor: Christopher Framarin email: chris.framarin@ucalgary.ca Office: 1212 SS Office Hours: T 2:00 4:00 and by appointment Course
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110 CRN Sec 018 Fall Term 2009 Purdue University Instructor: Daniel Kelly
1. Course Description Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110 CRN 25219 Sec 018 Fall Term 2009 Purdue University Instructor: Daniel Kelly Syllabus There are two main goals of this course. The first is
More informationPhil 83- Introduction to Philosophical Problems Spring 2018 Course # office hours: M/W/F, 12pm-1pm, and by appointment. Course Description:
Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 10am- 10:50am Room: Biddle 211 Instructor: Dr. Derek Leben leben@pitt.edu Phil 83- Introduction to Philosophical Problems Spring 2018 Course #24742 office hours: M/W/F, 12pm-1pm,
More informationLogic and Theism: Arguments For and Against Beliefs in God, by John Howard Sobel.
1 Logic and Theism: Arguments For and Against Beliefs in God, by John Howard Sobel. Cambridge University Press, 2003. 672 pages. $95. ROBERT C. KOONS, University of Texas This is a terrific book. I'm often
More informationTask 1: Philosophical Questions. Question 1: To what extent do you shape your own destiny, and how much is down to fate?
How to philosophise? Question everything and assume nothing! Task 1: Philosophical Questions A key skill in Philosophy is having the ability to think. When answering these questions, please give yourself
More informationIs God Good By Definition?
1 Is God Good By Definition? by Graham Oppy As a matter of historical fact, most philosophers and theologians who have defended traditional theistic views have been moral realists. Some divine command
More informationQuaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Quaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion Volume 1 Issue 1 Volume 1, Issue 1 (Spring 2015) Article 4 April 2015 Infinity and Beyond James M. Derflinger II Liberty University,
More informationBaha i Proofs for the Existence of God
Page 1 Baha i Proofs for the Existence of God Ian Kluge to show that belief in God can be rational and logically coherent and is not necessarily a product of uncritical religious dogmatism or ignorance.
More informationSyllabus. Mr. Israelsen Office: 7145 Beering Hall Spring Term Office Hours: Wednesday 12:30 2:00pm and by appointment
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110 Sec 019 LLEC Spring Term 2012 Purdue University Instructor: Daniel Kelly Teaching Assistants: Mr. Andrew Israelsen and Mr. Chapman Waters 1. Course Description
More informationWe begin our discussion, however, more than 400 years before Christ with the Athenian philosopher Socrates. Socrates asks the question:
Religion and Ethics The relationship between religion and ethics or faith and ethics is a complex one. So complex that it s the subject of entire courses, not to mention the innumerable books that have
More informationTable of x III. Modern Modal Ontological Arguments Norman Malcolm s argument Charles Hartshorne s argument A fly in the ointment? 86
Table of Preface page xvii divinity I. God, god, and God 3 1. Existence and essence questions 3 2. Names in questions of existence and belief 4 3. Etymology and semantics 6 4. The core attitudinal conception
More informationDepartment of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules
Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 2017/18 Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,
More informationHUME, CAUSATION AND TWO ARGUMENTS CONCERNING GOD
HUME, CAUSATION AND TWO ARGUMENTS CONCERNING GOD JASON MEGILL Carroll College Abstract. In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Hume (1779/1993) appeals to his account of causation (among other things)
More informationA CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment
A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE A Paper Presented to Dr. Douglas Blount Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for PHREL 4313 by Billy Marsh October 20,
More informationReview Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
More informationThe Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument Reading Questions The Cosmological Argument: Elementary Version The Cosmological Argument: Intermediate Version The Cosmological Argument: Advanced Version Summary of the Cosmological
More informationCopan, P. and P. Moser, eds., The Rationality of Theism, London: Routledge, 2003, pp.xi+292
Copan, P. and P. Moser, eds., The Rationality of Theism, London: Routledge, 2003, pp.xi+292 The essays in this book are organised into three groups: Part I: Foundational Considerations Part II: Arguments
More informationDIVINE FREEDOM AND FREE WILL DEFENSES
This is a pre-publication copy, please do not cite. The final paper is forthcoming in The Heythrop Journal (DOI: 10.1111/heyj.12075), but the Early View version is available now. DIVINE FREEDOM AND FREE
More informationClass 11 - February 23 Leibniz, Monadology and Discourse on Metaphysics
Philosophy 203: History of Modern Western Philosophy Spring 2010 Tuesdays, Thursdays: 9am - 10:15am Hamilton College Russell Marcus rmarcus1@hamilton.edu I. Minds, bodies, and pre-established harmony Class
More informationMcKenzie Study Center, an Institute of Gutenberg College. Handout 5 The Bible and the History of Ideas Teacher: John A. Jack Crabtree.
, an Institute of Gutenberg College Handout 5 The Bible and the History of Ideas Teacher: John A. Jack Crabtree Aristotle A. Aristotle (384 321 BC) was the tutor of Alexander the Great. 1. Socrates taught
More informationFear and Trembling: The knight of faith and movement. (Lecture 3 accompanying notes for reading of the Preamble from the heart )
EXISTENTIALISM AND PHENOMENOLOGY Mondays 4-6pm in L006 Oct 15 th Fear and Trembling: The knight of faith and movement. (Lecture 3 accompanying notes for reading of the Preamble from the heart ) The knight
More informationThe Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument Stage I 1. Causal Premise: Everything of type T has a cause. [note: cause purpose]. 2. Something of type T exists. 3. There is a reason X for thinking that there is a First Cause
More informationPhilosophy: The Quest For Truth PDF
Philosophy: The Quest For Truth PDF Praised for its accessibility and comprehensiveness, Philosophy: The Quest for Truth provides an excellent selection of classical and contemporary readings on nineteen
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110 Fall Term 2010 Purdue University Instructor: Daniel Kelly
1. Course Description Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110 Fall Term 2010 Purdue University Instructor: Daniel Kelly Syllabus There are two main goals of this course. The first is to introduce students
More informationTHERE IS AN HISTORICAL DEBATE in philosophy that begins with Plato s
Craig on God and Morality Thomas W. Smythe and Michael Rectenwald ABSTRACT: In this paper we critically evaluate an argument put forward by William Lane Craig for the existence of God based on the assumption
More informationBetting on God: Pascal, Probability Theory and Theology. nevertheless made surprising contributions to the field of religious philosophy.
Silsbee 1 Betting on God: Pascal, Probability Theory and Theology Blaise Pascal, born in 17 th century France, was a mathematician and physicist who nevertheless made surprising contributions to the field
More informationDoes God exist? The argument from evil
Does God exist? The argument from evil There are two especially important arguments against belief in God. The first is based on the (alleged) lack of evidence for God s existence, and the rule that one
More informationNew Chapter: Philosophy of Religion
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 3: 1-16 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Aquinas s The Summa Theologica (The Cosmological Argument) b. Anselm, Proslogium (The
More information3 The Problem of Absolute Reality
3 The Problem of Absolute Reality How can the truth be found? How can we determine what is the objective reality, what is the absolute truth? By starting at the beginning, having first eliminated all preconceived
More informationOn Breaking the Spell of Irrationality (with treatment of Pascal s Wager) Selmer Bringsjord Are Humans Rational? 11/27/17 version 2 RPI
On Breaking the Spell of Irrationality (with treatment of Pascal s Wager) Selmer Bringsjord Are Humans Rational? 11/27/17 version 2 RPI Some Logistics Some Logistics Recall schedule: Next three classes
More informationThe Existence of God. See Life s Ultimate Questions, by Ronald Nash Chapters 12 & 13
The Existence of God See Life s Ultimate Questions, by Ronald Nash Chapters 12 & 13 Noetic Structure Definition: A person s beliefs plus the relationships among those beliefs Some beliefs serve as the
More informationCourse Description: Texts Exploring Philosophy of Religion (2 nd ), ed. Steven Cahn. Requirements:
Phil 474- Philosophy of Religion Fall 2018 Course # 31152 Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 2pm-2:50pm Room: Biddle 252 Instructor: Dr. Derek Leben leben@pitt.edu office hours: MWF, 1-2pm, and by appointment
More informationPhilosophy 1100 Honors Introduction to Ethics
Philosophy 1100 Honors Introduction to Ethics Lecture 2 Introductory Discussion Part 2 Critical Thinking, Meta-Ethics, Philosophy, and Religion An Overview of the Introductory Material: The Main Topics
More informationFirst Principles. Principles of Reality. Undeniability.
First Principles. First principles are the foundation of knowledge. Without them nothing could be known (see FOUNDATIONALISM). Even coherentism uses the first principle of noncontradiction to test the
More informationWHY THERE REALLY ARE NO IRREDUCIBLY NORMATIVE PROPERTIES
WHY THERE REALLY ARE NO IRREDUCIBLY NORMATIVE PROPERTIES Bart Streumer b.streumer@rug.nl In David Bakhurst, Brad Hooker and Margaret Little (eds.), Thinking About Reasons: Essays in Honour of Jonathan
More informationSwinburne. General Problem
Swinburne Why God Allows Evil 1 General Problem Why would an omnipotent, perfectly good God allow evil to exist? If there is not an adequate "theodicy," then the existence of evil is evidence against the
More informationPhilosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4152 Online Course El Camino College Spring, 2017
Philosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4152 Online Course El Camino College Spring, 2017 Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu Office: SOCS 108
More informationDepartment of Philosophy. Module descriptions 20118/19. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules
Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 20118/19 Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,
More informationMonday, September 26, The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument God? Classical Theism Classical conception of God: God is Eternal: everlasting Omnipotent: all-powerful Transcendent: beyond the world Omnipresent: everywhere Compassionate:
More informationUnderstanding Truth Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002
1 Symposium on Understanding Truth By Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002 2 Precis of Understanding Truth Scott Soames Understanding Truth aims to illuminate
More informationTHE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE
THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE By Kenneth Richard Samples The influential British mathematician-philosopher Bertrand Russell once remarked, "I am as firmly convinced that religions do
More informationPuzzles for Divine Omnipotence & Divine Freedom
Puzzles for Divine Omnipotence & Divine Freedom 1. Defining Omnipotence: A First Pass: God is said to be omnipotent. In other words, God is all-powerful. But, what does this mean? Is the following definition
More information