Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Transcription

1 Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning Ivan Phillips - Bayes Theorem tells us how we ought to update our beliefs in a set of predefined theories in light of new evidence. It is considered by many to be the gold standard of rational inference. It s not rational to believe a theory just because it is possible. The theory must be inductively probable for it to be rationally believable. There are many side questions surrounding how we come up with theories, and how we ought to set our prior beliefs, but this presentation will keep things simple. To illustrate the theorem, we ll work through a simple probability problem without the theorem. A Dice Game Suppose I have a 4-sided die and a 20-sided die (a dodecahedron). The 4-sided die is a 4-sided pyramid with triangular sides, numbered 1 through 4. The 20-sided die is a dodecahedron with sides numbered I take one of these dice at random, and roll it. At this stage you have no idea which of the two dice I rolled. However, you have two theories: T4 = The theory that I chose to roll the 4-sided die. T20 = The theory that I chose to roll the 4-sided die. Here is where we introduce our first key concept: the prior probability. Prior probability represents your confidence or degree of belief in each theory. Since you know that I rolled at least one die, but you don t know which, your confidence is evenly split between each theory, and your prior probability is 0.5 (or 50%). By convention,m we write this as and P (T4) = 0.5 P (T20) = 0.5 Now, I give you a little more information. I report to you that I rolled a 3. Which die did I probably roll? Obviously, either of the dice could possibly give me a 3 because both dice have a side labeled 3. However, we re not asking whether the theories are possibly true, but which theory is probably true. Humans find probability calculations difficult, and it s often easier for us to work things out in terms of frequencies. To do this, just imagine that we play this game very many times. Let s suppose we play this same game 200 times. When I randomly select between the two dice, I will select the 4-sided die 50% of the time and

2 the 20-sided die 50% of the time. That means that, in 200 plays, I will select the 4-sided die 100 times and the 20-sided die 100 times. In 100 rolls of the 4-sided die, I will roll a three 25 times. In 100 rolls of the 20-sided die, I will roll a three just 5 times. The relative likelihood of seeing our evidence in each theory will be used to update our beliefs based on the evidence. This information has a name in Bayesian reasoning. It s called a likelihood function, and it expresses the probability of seeing some evidence in a given theory. P (3 T4) = 25/100 = 25% This equation says that the probability of getting the evidence (rolling a 3) given T4 is 25%. Similarly: P (3 T20) = 5 / 100 = 5% Okay, back to our calculation. Overall, 200 plays will result in my rolling a three 30 times, 25 of which will be on the 4-sided die. As a result, I can say that 83.3% of the time, a three is rolled on the 4-sided die. In terms of a formula, I am calculating my updated probability or confidence in T4: P(3 T4) P(3 T4) + P(3 T20) = 25% P (T 4 3) = 25% + 5% = 8 3.3% This ratio gives me a conditional probability of T4 being true given the evidence that a three was rolled. This is how inductive inference works. Based on our knowledge (or ignorance) of the world, and based upon our theories, we can shift our confidence in our theories when we get new evidence. Initially, we were no more confident in T4 than in T20, but after hearing that a three was rolled, we are now 83.3% confident in T4, and only 16.6% confident in T20. Now, suppose I continue the game. I will roll the same die I selected last time, and report what I have rolled. Obviously, things have now changed. You expect a low number more than you expect a high number. If I roll a 3 again, you will be even more confident that the theory T4 is true. With each round of evidence, our prior belief in each theory has to be taken into account. This brings us to Bayes Theorem: P (T 1 E) = P(T ) P(E T ) 1 1 P(T ) P(E T ) + P(T ) P(E T ) This assumes that T1 and T2 are our only theories, and that they are mutually exclusive. The E represents our evidence. Bayesian reasoning is usually presented as an iterative process. We start with our prior probabilities, P(T1) and P(T2). We get some evidence, E, and compute our new confidence in each theory, P(T1 E) and P(T2 E). When we go into the next round of experimentation, our conditional probabilities become our new prior probabilities.

3 Some Intuitive Principles Bayesian inference can be summed up intuitively in three principles. The first principle, as illustrated above, is this: All things being equal, that the theory that makes more definite, restrictive predictions is more likely to be true when the data falls in line with those predictions. A corollary being that theories that are vague or more prediction-less are less likely to be true, even if they are compatible with more possible outcomes. When we iterate this inference process, we can become very confident in a theory. If I roll the selected die another 9 times (a total of 10 rolls), and all 10 rolls are reported as being between one and four (inclusive), you are now extremely confident that I selected the 4-sided die. In fact, the probability of rolling four or less in 10 consecutive rolls of a 20-sided die is approximately 1 in 10 million. This leads us to our second principle: All things are not equal! Evidence accumulates, and can make us extremely confident in our theory. Finally, once we reach a very high level of confidence, we start to question counterevidence more carefully. If I roll the selected die an 11th time, and report that I rolled a 14, it naively appears that the game is up, and I know for certain that the selected die was the 20-sided die. However, this conclusion is incorrect. How confident are we that the reports you are hearing are true? How confident are you that I read the die correctly, that I spoke my report correctly, and that you heard my report correctly? These highly improbable errors are negligible when our confidence in a theory is relatively low. Let s suppose that the probability of you mishearing my report is 1 in a million. This has a negligible effect on the first conclusion, changing the initial 83.3% estimate by around 1 part in a million. Similarly, if my first roll was a 14, our naive posterior probability would be 100% in favor of the 20-sided die, and this, too, only changes by 1 part in a million. However, once we have overwhelming evidence for the 4-sided die being the selected die, it becomes potentially more likely that we misheard the report than that our well-established theory is incorrect. Thus, our third principle is this: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence! To resolve this problem, we need more empirical data. We need more control over the experiment to ensure that false positives are not corrupting our conclusion.

4 Evidence What counts as evidence? The evidence can be anything we experience. We re not limited to the five senses. Induction and Deduction The process as described here results in an inductive inference. Inductive inference is an inference from the specific to the general. Induction takes data, and infers a rule that is probably true, but not necessarily true. However, the process of inductive inference relies on deduction. Deduction takes a general rule and infers specifics that are necessarily true if the general rule is true. If my 4-sided die is a fair die, then we expect (in the statistical sense) 100 rolls to be split evenly across each of the 4 possibilities, i.e., 25 ones, 25 twos, 25 threes and 25 fours. This is true by definition of a 4-sided die. In general, our likelihood functions, P(E T), are deductive calculations. They are necessarily true based on the definitions of our theories. Note: we teach deduction in high schools, but induction is rarely ever taught in a formal way, even at the graduate level. Abduction The dice game example problem is simplified to make the method of inference easy to see. However, in the real world, situations are usually more complex, and we re not served our theories on a silver platter. Instead, we look at data, and must invent theories that will be plugged into our Bayesian inference. This process of invention is usually called abduction, and it requires intelligence and creativity. Creativity is needed to invent the theory, and intelligence is needed to check its self-consistency. Prior to the scientific theory of evolution, the only known way of getting complexity was through design. By the time Charles Darwin set out on his voyages, it had already been observed that species appeared to have evolved over long periods of time. Charles Darwin recognized that inheritance, natural selection and mutation could result in an evolutionary process that creates new species and causes others to become extinct. This step of establishing a candidate theory, of establishing that a theory could work, is regarded as separate from the inductive inference that the theory is most likely to be true. Thus, invention of theories in this fashion is not a case of either deduction or Bayesian induction. It s probably best classified as a case of abduction.

5 Discussion Questions Does it make sense to say that I believe that P is true, but I don t think P is probable.? If it does not make sense, then any proper belief has to be tied to some statement of probability, even if that statement is vague. What shall we say about theories that make no predictions? If a theory makes no predictions, isn t it identical to the Null Hypothesis, i.e., the hypothesis that there is no relationship between phenomena? The Monty Hall Problem The Monty Hall problem has a very counterintuitive answer: Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice? Bayes Theorem makes the correct answer easier to see. How does Bayesian Reasoning relate to Occam s Razor? Jefferys and Berger (1991) state "a hypothesis with fewer adjustable parameters will automatically have an enhanced posterior probability, due to the fact that the predictions it makes are sharp".

Chapter 20 Testing Hypotheses for Proportions

Chapter 20 Testing Hypotheses for Proportions A hypothesis proposes a model for the world. Then we look at the data. If the data are consistent with that model, we have no reason to disbelieve the hypothesis.

Logical (formal) fallacies

Fallacies in academic writing Chad Nilep There are many possible sources of fallacy an idea that is mistakenly thought to be true, even though it may be untrue in academic writing. The phrase logical fallacy

Outline. The argument from so many arguments. Framework. Royall s case. Ted Poston

Outline The argument from so many arguments Ted Poston poston@southalabama.edu University of South Alabama Plantinga Workshop Baylor University Nov 6-8, 2014 1 Measuring confirmation Framework Log likelihood

McDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards

Math Program correlated to Grade-Level ( in regular (non-capitalized) font are eligible for inclusion on Oregon Statewide Assessment) CCG: NUMBERS - Understand numbers, ways of representing numbers, relationships

Philosophy Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction

Philosophy 5340 - Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction In the section entitled Sceptical Doubts Concerning the Operations of the Understanding

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

Prentice Hall Mathematics:,, 2004 Missouri s Framework for Curricular Development in Mathematics (Grades 9-12) TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING 1. Problem-solving strategies such as organizing data, drawing a

11 Beware of Syllogism: Statistical Reasoning and Conjecturing According to Peirce

isaac levi 11 Beware of Syllogism: Statistical Reasoning and Conjecturing According to Peirce 1. probable deduction Peirce wrote extensively on deduction, induction, and hypothesis beginning with the Harvard

Explanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic

Explanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic A central problem facing a probabilistic approach to the problem of induction is the difficulty of sufficiently constraining prior probabilities so

The argument from so many arguments

The argument from so many arguments Ted Poston May 6, 2015 There probably is a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn t. John Von Neumann My goal in this paper is to offer

PHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1

Y e P a g e 1 Exercise 1 Pg. 17 1. When is an idea or statement valid? (trick question) A statement or an idea cannot be valid; they can only be true or false. Being valid or invalid are properties of

Reasoning about the future: Doom and Beauty

Synthese (2007) 156:427 439 DOI 10.1007/s11229-006-9132-y ORIGINAL PAPER Reasoning about the future: Doom and Beauty Dennis Dieks Published online: 12 April 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Time is limited. Define your terms. Give short and conventional definitions. Use reputable sources.

FIVE MINUTES WITH A DARWINIST: EXPOSING THE FLUFF IN EVOLUTION Approaching the Evolutionist Without religious books Without revelation Without faith F.L.U.F.F. Evolution is more air than substance. Focus

Scientific Realism and Empiricism

Philosophy 164/264 December 3, 2001 1 Scientific Realism and Empiricism Administrative: All papers due December 18th (at the latest). I will be available all this week and all next week... Scientific Realism

THE TENDENCY TO CERTAINTY IN RELIGIOUS BELIEF.

THE TENDENCY TO CERTAINTY IN RELIGIOUS BELIEF. BY ROBERT H. THOULESS. (From the Department of Psychology, Glasgow University.) First published in British Journal of Psychology, XXVI, pp. 16-31, 1935. I.

MLLunsford, Spring Activity: Conditional Probability and The Law of Total Probability

MLLunsford, Spring 2003 1 Activity: Conditional Probability and The Law of Total Probability Concepts: Conditional Probability, Independent Events, the Multiplication Rule, the Law of Total Probability

Six Sigma Prof. Dr. T. P. Bagchi Department of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Six Sigma Prof. Dr. T. P. Bagchi Department of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture No. #05 Review of Probability and Statistics I Good afternoon, it is Tapan Bagchi again. I have

IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

MÈTODE Science Studies Journal, 5 (2015): 195-199. University of Valencia. DOI: 10.7203/metode.84.3883 ISSN: 2174-3487. Article received: 10/07/2014, accepted: 18/09/2014. IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH?

THE HYPOTHETICAL-DEDUCTIVE METHOD OR THE INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION: THE CASE OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION

THE HYPOTHETICAL-DEDUCTIVE METHOD OR THE INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION: THE CASE OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION JUAN ERNESTO CALDERON ABSTRACT. Critical rationalism sustains that the

Project: The Power of a Hypothesis Test

Project: The Power of a Hypothesis Test Let s revisit the basics of hypothesis testing for a bit here, shall we? Any hypothesis test contains two mutually exclusive hypotheses, H 0 and H 1 (AKA, H A ).

From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of

Chapter 1 - Introduction to Ecology What is Ecology??? From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of Ecology = the study of the relationship between organisms and their environment quite a large area of

SHOULD INTELLIGENT DESIGN BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOL?

Join the national conversation! SHOULD INTELLIGENT DESIGN BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOL? Focus Words design creationism concept evolve perspective Weekly Passage Bethany Collchay s parents want Bethany to believe

Evidential Support and Instrumental Rationality

Evidential Support and Instrumental Rationality Peter Brössel, Anna-Maria A. Eder, and Franz Huber Formal Epistemology Research Group Zukunftskolleg and Department of Philosophy University of Konstanz

Feb 3 rd. The Truth Project

February 3, 2013 January Jan 6 th The Truth Project Who is God? Part 1 Jan 13 th The Truth Project Who is God? Part 2 Jan 20 th The Truth Project What is True? Part 1 Jan 27 th The Truth Project What is

Grade 6 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home

Grade 6 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home I. Introduction: (1 day) Look at p. 1 in the textbook with your child and learn how to use the math book effectively. DO: Scavenger

Firing Squads and Fine-Tuning: Sober on the Design Argument Jonathan Weisberg

Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 56 (2005), 809 821 Firing Squads and Fine-Tuning: Sober on the Design Argument Jonathan Weisberg ABSTRACT Elliott Sober has recently argued that the cosmological design argument is

Logic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of

Logic: Inductive Logic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of premises and a conclusion. The quality of an argument depends on at least two factors: the truth of the

Prof. Bryan Caplan Econ 812

Prof. Bryan Caplan bcaplan@gmu.edu http://www.bcaplan.com Econ 812 Week 1: Efficiency and Probability I. The Many Meanings of Efficiency A. The Merriam-Webster College Dictionary defines "efficiency" as

Did God Use Evolution? Observations From A Scientist Of Faith By Dr. Werner Gitt

Did God Use Evolution? Observations From A Scientist Of Faith By Dr. Werner Gitt If you are searched for the book Did God Use Evolution? Observations from a Scientist of Faith by Dr. Werner Gitt in pdf

Philosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism

Michael Huemer on Skepticism Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology Topic 3 - Skepticism Chapter II. The Lure of Radical Skepticism 1. Mike Huemer defines radical skepticism as follows: Philosophical skeptics

climate change in the american mind Americans Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in March 2012

climate change in the american mind Americans Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in March 2012 Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in March 2012 Interview

Bayesianism and inference to the best explanation

Bayesianism and inference to the best explanation Received: 2006.04.10 Final Version: 2008.02.23 BIBLID [0495-4548 (2008) 23: 61; pp. 89-106] ABSTRACT: Bayesianism and Inference to the best explanation

Argument from Design. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. David Hume

Argument from Design Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion David Hume Dialogues published posthumously and anonymously (1779) Three Characters Demea: theism, dogmatism, some philosophical arguments for

Many Minds are No Worse than One

Replies 233 Many Minds are No Worse than One David Papineau 1 Introduction 2 Consciousness 3 Probability 1 Introduction The Everett-style interpretation of quantum mechanics developed by Michael Lockwood

1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview

1. Introduction 1.1. Formal deductive logic 1.1.0. Overview In this course we will study reasoning, but we will study only certain aspects of reasoning and study them only from one perspective. The special

ASA 2017 Annual Meeting. Stephen Dilley, Ph.D., and Nicholas Tafacory St Edward s University

ASA 2017 Annual Meeting Stephen Dilley, Ph.D., and Nicholas Tafacory St Edward s University 1. A number of biology textbooks endorse problematic theology-laden arguments for evolution. 1. A number of biology

From the SelectedWorks of Gary E. Silvers Ph.D. 2014 The Advancement: A Book Review Gary E. Silvers, Ph.D. Available at: https://works.bepress.com/dr_gary_silvers/2/ The Advancement: Keeping the Faith

Rationality JOHN BROOME. Rationality as a Property and Rationality as a Source of Requirements

36 Rationality JOHN BROOME Rationality as a Property and Rationality as a Source of Requirements The word rationality often refers to a property the property of being rational. This property may be possessed

The doomsday argument and the number of possible observers

The doomsday argument and the number of possible observers Ken D. Olum September 2000 Abstract If the human race comes to an end relatively shortly, then we have been born at a fairly typical time in history

Transferability and Proofs

Transferability and Proofs Kenny Easwaran Draft of October 15, 2007 1 Grice on Meaning [Grice, 1957] argues for the following account of non-natural meaning (i.e., ordinary linguistic meaning): A meant

Utilitarianism. But what is meant by intrinsically good and instrumentally good?

Utilitarianism 1. What is Utilitarianism?: This is the theory of morality which says that the right action is always the one that best promotes the total amount of happiness in the world. Utilitarianism

Giving up Judgment Empiricism: The Bayesian Epistemology of Bertrand Russell and Grover Maxwell

James Hawthorne Giving up Judgment Empiricism: The Bayesian Epistemology of Bertrand Russell and Grover Maxwell Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits was first published in 1948. 1 The view on inductive

More See Too Much Religious Talk by Politicians

March 21, 2012 Santorum Voters Disagree More See Too Much Religious Talk by Politicians FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut President, Pew Research Center Carroll Doherty, Michael Dimock Associate

The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support

MITOCW Lecture 14 The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to offer high quality educational resources for free. To make a

Prisoners' Dilemma Is a Newcomb Problem

DAVID LEWIS Prisoners' Dilemma Is a Newcomb Problem Several authors have observed that Prisoners' Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem are related-for instance, in that both involve controversial appeals to dominance.,

In today s workshop. We will I. Science vs. Religion: Where did Life on earth come from?

Since humans began studying the world around them, they have wondered how the biodiversity we see around us came to be. There have been many ideas posed throughout history, but not enough observable facts

Pictures, Proofs, and Mathematical Practice : Reply to James Robert Brown

Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 50 (1999), 425 429 DISCUSSION Pictures, Proofs, and Mathematical Practice : Reply to James Robert Brown In a recent article, James Robert Brown ([1997]) has argued that pictures and

Action in Special Contexts

Part III Action in Special Contexts c36.indd 283 c36.indd 284 36 Rationality john broome Rationality as a Property and Rationality as a Source of Requirements The word rationality often refers to a property

(To appear in W. Mann, ed., Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Religion) The Design Argument. Elliott Sober 1

(To appear in W. Mann, ed., Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Religion) The Design Argument Elliott Sober 1 The design argument is one of three main arguments for the existence of God; the others are the

Darwinian Morality. Why aren t t all the atheists raping and pillaging? Ron Garret (Erann( Gat) September 2004

Darwinian Morality Why aren t t all the atheists raping and pillaging? Ron Garret (Erann( Gat) September 2004 Morality without God? If there is no God, there are no rights and wrongs that transcend personal

Curriculum Guide for Pre-Algebra

Unit 1: Variable, Expressions, & Integers 2 Weeks PA: 1, 2, 3, 9 Where did Math originate? Why is Math possible? What should we expect as we use Math? How should we use Math? What is the purpose of using

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Precising definition Theoretical definition Persuasive definition Syntactic definition Operational definition 1. Are questions about defining a phrase

Realism and the success of science argument. Leplin:

Realism and the success of science argument Leplin: 1) Realism is the default position. 2) The arguments for anti-realism are indecisive. In particular, antirealism offers no serious rival to realism in

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE

CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE Section 1. A Mediate Inference is a proposition that depends for proof upon two or more other propositions, so connected together by one or

DOES EVOLUTION REALLY THREATEN RELIGION? JOHN OSTROWICK PhD Candidate (UCT/Edin.), MA (Phil) (Wits), HdipEd (Phys.Sci.) (Wits)

DOES EVOLUTION REALLY THREATEN RELIGION? JOHN OSTROWICK PhD Candidate (UCT/Edin.), MA (Phil) (Wits), HdipEd (Phys.Sci.) (Wits) www.ostrowick.com DISCLAIMER The views presented in this talk do not represent

Mètode Science Studies Journal ISSN: Universitat de València España

Mètode Science Studies Journal ISSN: 2174-3487 metodessj@uv.es Universitat de València España Sober, Elliott IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Mètode

Bounded Rationality :: Bounded Models

Bounded Rationality :: Bounded Models Jocelyn Smith University of British Columbia 201-2366 Main Mall Vancouver BC jdsmith@cs.ubc.ca Abstract In economics and game theory agents are assumed to follow a

A simple argument against design

Religious Studies (2010) 00, 1 8 f Cambridge University Press 2010 doi:10.1017/s0034412510000399 A simple argument against design DAN MOLLER Philosophy Department, University of Maryland, College Park,

Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race. Course Description

Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race Course Description Human Nature & Human Diversity is listed as both a Philosophy course (PHIL 253) and a Cognitive Science

16 Free Will Requires Determinism

16 Free Will Requires Determinism John Baer The will is infinite, and the execution confined... the desire is boundless, and the act a slave to limit. William Shakespeare, Troilus and Cressida, III. ii.75

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.

BIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH. September 29m 2016

BIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH September 29m 2016 REFLECTIONS OF GOD IN SCIENCE God s wisdom is displayed in the marvelously contrived design of the universe and its parts. God s omnipotence

PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS. Methods that Metaphysicians Use

PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS Methods that Metaphysicians Use Method 1: The appeal to what one can imagine where imagining some state of affairs involves forming a vivid image of that state of affairs.

Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason

Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason Alexander R. Pruss Department of Philosophy Baylor University October 8, 2015 Contents The Principle of Sufficient Reason Against the PSR Chance Fundamental

Quaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion

Quaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 5 January 2017 Modern Day Teleology Brianna Cunningham Liberty University, bcunningham4@liberty.edu

Sample Questions with Explanations for LSAT India

Five Sample Logical Reasoning Questions and Explanations Directions: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one

ECONOMETRIC METHODOLOGY AND THE STATUS OF ECONOMICS. Cormac O Dea. Junior Sophister

Student Economic Review, Vol. 19, 2005 ECONOMETRIC METHODOLOGY AND THE STATUS OF ECONOMICS Cormac O Dea Junior Sophister The question of whether econometrics justifies conferring the epithet of science

Deep Neural Networks [GBC] Chap. 6, 7, 8. CS 486/686 University of Waterloo Lecture 18: June 28, 2017

Deep Neural Networks [GBC] Chap. 6, 7, 8 CS 486/686 University of Waterloo Lecture 18: June 28, 2017 Outline Deep Neural Networks Gradient Vanishing Rectified linear units Overfitting Dropout Breakthroughs

Can science prove the existence of a creator?

Science and Christianity By Martin Stokley The interaction between science and Christianity can be a fruitful place for apologetics. Defence of the faith against wrong views of science is necessary if

FALSE DICHOTOMY PRESENTATION

evolution vs. creation FALSE DICHOTOMY PRESENTATION A great resource for demonstrating the false dichotomy of evolution vs. young earth creationism and STARTING CONVERSATION Presentation prepared by Tracy

INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE

INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE Péter Érdi Henry R. Luce Professor Center for Complex Systems Studies Kalamazoo College, Michigan and Dept. Biophysics KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics of

"We Think That We Think Clearly, But That's Only Because We Don't Think Clearly": Brian Josephson on Mathematics, Mind, and the Human World*

"We Think That We Think Clearly, But That's Only Because We Don't Think Clearly": Brian Josephson on Mathematics, Mind, and the Human World* About five years ago, Andrew Robinson, who has written quite

SEVENTH GRADE RELIGION will learn nature, origin and role of the sacraments in the life of the church. will learn to appreciate and enter more fully into the sacramental life of the church. THE CREED ~

The 2010 Jewish Population Study of Metropolitan Chicago METHODOLOGY REPORT

n Job #I1188 The 2010 Jewish Population Study of Metropolitan Chicago METHODOLOGY REPORT On behalf of the Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, Ukeles Associates (UAI) contracted

Three Kinds of Arguments

Chapter 27 Three Kinds of Arguments Arguments in general We ve been focusing on Moleculan-analyzable arguments for several chapters, but now we want to take a step back and look at the big picture, at

New Chapter: Philosophy of Religion

Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 6: 1-25 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Dennett, Show Me the Science b. Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (10) c.

Error and the Law Exchanges with Larry Laudan

Error and the Law Exchanges with Larry Laudan Deborah G. Mayo As with each of the contributions to this volume, my remarks on Larry Laudan reflect numerous exchanges over a long period, in this case, since

The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind

criticalthinking.org http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-critical-mind-is-a-questioning-mind/481 The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind Learning How to Ask Powerful, Probing Questions Introduction

A Stroke of Genius: Striving for Greatness in All You Do

About the author: A Stroke of Genius: Striving for Greatness in All You Do by R. W. Hamming Dr. Richard Hamming is best known for the Hamming code, Hamming distance and the Hamming spectral window along

Positivist Criminology: the search for a criminal type? Dan Ellingworth Understanding Criminology Friday, 24 October 2008

Positivist Criminology: the search for a criminal type? Dan Ellingworth Understanding Criminology Friday, 24 October 2008 Lecture Outline The debate with classical criminology The basis of a positivist

This is the central lesson of Calculated Risks, a fascinating book by Gerd Gigerenzer, a cognitive

Page 1 of 5 APRIL 25, 2010, 5:00 PM Chances Are By STEVEN STROGATZ Steven Strogatz on math, from basic to baffling. Tags: breast cancer screening, conditional probability, Gerd Gigerenzer, mammograms,

Christianity and Science. Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Must we choose? A Slick New Packaging of Creationism

and Science Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, is a documentary which looks at how scientists who have discussed or written about Intelligent Design (and along the way

Dennett's Reduction of Brentano's Intentionality

Dennett's Reduction of Brentano's Intentionality By BRENT SILBY Department of Philosophy University of Canterbury Copyright (c) Brent Silby 1998 www.def-logic.com/articles Since as far back as the middle

A Priori Bootstrapping

A Priori Bootstrapping Ralph Wedgwood In this essay, I shall explore the problems that are raised by a certain traditional sceptical paradox. My conclusion, at the end of this essay, will be that the most

Lecture 6 Keynes s Concept of Probability

Lecture 6 Keynes s Concept of Probability Patrick Maher Scientific Thought II Spring 2010 John Maynard Keynes 1883: Born in Cambridge, England 1904: B.A. Cambridge University 1914 18: World War I 1919:

The Paradox of Free Will Free Will If some unimpeachable source God, say were to tell me that I didn t have free will, I d have to regard that piece of information as proof that I didn t understand the

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments 1. HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT Example 1. Socrates must be mortal. After all, all humans are mortal, and Socrates is a human. What does the author of this

MITOCW watch?v=ogo1gpxsuzu

MITOCW watch?v=ogo1gpxsuzu The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to offer high quality educational resources for free. To

A level Religious Studies at Titus Salt

Component 2 Philosophy of Religion Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive This theme considers how the philosophy of religion has, over time, influenced and been influenced by developments

Theory of Knowledge. 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree?

Theory of Knowledge 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree? Candidate Name: Syed Tousif Ahmed Candidate Number: 006644 009

Sounds of Love Series SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION

Sounds of Love Series SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION I will now speak to you about spiritual evolution. Everything seems to be evolving in this universe. There is evolution of the planets, the stars, the moons, the

Introduction The Definition of Science

An Introduction to Science Scientific Thinking and the Scientific Method by Steven D. Schafersman Department of Geology Miami University January, 1997 http://www.muohio.edu/~schafesd/documents/intro-to-sci.htmlx

BIO 221 Invertebrate Zoology I Spring Course Information. Course Website. Lecture 1. Stephen M. Shuster Professor of Invertebrate Zoology

BIO 221 Invertebrate Zoology I Spring 2010 Stephen M. Shuster Northern Arizona University http://www4.nau.edu/isopod Lecture 1 Course Information Stephen M. Shuster Professor of Invertebrate Zoology Office:

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2014, How Americans Feel About Religious Groups

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE JULY 16, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Alan Cooperman, Director of Religion Research Greg Smith, Associate Director, Research Besheer

THERE is an obvious need for accurate data on the trend in the number of. in the Republic of Ireland, BRENDAN M. WALSH*

Trends in the Religious in the Republic of Ireland, Composition of the Population BRENDAN M. WALSH* Abstract: Compared with 1946 there were more Catholics in the Republic in 1971 but 24 per cent fewer

A Refutation of Skeptical Theism. David Kyle Johnson

A Refutation of Skeptical Theism David Kyle Johnson The evidential problem of evil suggests that our awareness of the existence of seemingly unjustified evils reduces the epistemic probability of God s

Evidential arguments from evil

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48: 1 10, 2000. 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 1 Evidential arguments from evil RICHARD OTTE University of California at Santa

U.S. Catholics Express Favorable View of Pope Francis

0 April 3, 2013 First Reactions More Positive than for Pope Benedict U.S. Catholics Express Favorable View of Pope Francis FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Cooperman Associate Director, Pew Research