West Windsor Community Discussion

Transcription

1 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Google... Page 1 of 12 Recently Visited Groups Help Sign in West Windsor Community Discussion Search this group Search Groups Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. 17 messages - Collapse all View profile During his campaign, Charlie Morgan said he could get a free (at no cost to WW taxpayers) parking garage built immediately. Can he good on his promise of a free garage? Charlie said all we have to do is copy what Hamilton did. Can he deliver or was it simply empty campaign rhetoric with no substance? View profile I meant to write: Options More options May 17, 11:20 am More options May 17, 11:32 am Home Discussions + new post Pages Files About this group Join this group Sponsored Links Imagens e Toques Baixe Imagens e Toques e Turbine seu Celular. 1⁰ Conteúdo Grátis. DiversaoNoSeuCelular.com.br/Toques Par Ideal - parideal.com Encontros namoro amizade amigos solteiros divorciados WebCam chat Encontre o Que Procura Mulheres bonitas de todas as idades Conheça e saia com elas aqui! See your message here... Can he MAKE good on his promise of a free garage? On May 17, 11:20 am, "" <michaelrana...@gmail.com> wrote: Nae View profile More options May 17, 1:51 pm Hey Mike: If you have not noticed, the election is over. Charlie pointed out to the Parking Garage at Hamilton that was built without tax payers money. We could do it as well. I suggest that we all try to help anybody who would push forward a Parking Garage for West Windsor residents. I also suggest that you catch up with what Charlie had proposed. Please drop the negative

2 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Google... Page 2 of 12 attitude and start making positive suggestions. Thank you. View profile, More options May 17, 2:23 pm What I posted was far from negative. If a FREE parking garage is in the best interests of WW residents, and the campaign promise was more than vapor, it is something that should happen regardless of the outcome of the election. Charlie's campaign hinged heavily on this FREE garage/parking and I was wondering if this is something that will see the light of day or was a "good only if I am elected" promise. Not negative but inquisitive. Well, maybe only about as negative as your post regarding a 0% tax increase. On May 17, 1:51 pm, Nae <hemin...@gmail.com> wrote: Charlie View profile More options May 17, 5:46 pm - I've given up trying to respond to Mr. Ranallo. He is more interested in throwing stones and engaging in theatrics - more interested in being destructive than constructive. This post is just another example. If he really wanted to know how this works, he would have read the information that I've posted publicly previously or he would have simply reached out to me and asked for the information. The Parking Authority is moving forward with its own ideas. See the attached documents that came to Council from the Parking Authority late last week. Charlie From: WWCommunityDiscussion@googlegroups.com

3 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Google... Page 3 of 12 [mailto:wwcommunitydiscussion@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nae Sent: Sunday, May 17, :51 PM To: WWCommunityDiscussion@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. Hey Mike: If you have not noticed, the election is over. Charlie pointed out to the Parking Garage at Hamilton that was built without tax payers money. We could do it as well. I suggest that we all try to help anybody who would push forward a Parking Garage for West Windsor residents. I also suggest that you catch up with what Charlie had proposed. Please drop the negative attitude and start making positive suggestions. Thank you. On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:20 AM, <michaelrana...@gmail.com> wrote: During his campaign, Charlie Morgan said he could get a free (at no cost to WW taxpayers) parking garage built immediately. Can he good on his promise of a free garage? Charlie said all we have to do is copy what Hamilton did. Can he deliver or was it simply empty campaign rhetoric with no substance? WWPA Action Plan for Mayor and Council.pdf 50K Download WWPA Designation as Redevelopment Entity final.pdf 80K Download Nae View profile Dear Mike: More options May 17, 11:16 pm This is the second time that you have gone beyond the rules of the group. As I posted in the introduction: "Following suggestions from several residents I started this discussion group to provide a forum to identify the issues, suggest ideas and discuss ways to improve the quality of life in West Windsor Township. The goal is to work together and exchange information and ideas as we look for a better future for West Windsor residents. Membership is open for everybody who wishes to participate but you

4 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Google... Page 4 of 12 have to be registered in order to post a message. Please use your full name as your ID. Please be nice and constructive. Please post short messages and talk about the issues and suggested solutions, not about individuals. If you post information, please provide a link to the source. I look forward to a productive exchange of information and ideas." I was hoping that your recent post was sent as a private message, but unfortunately, it was sent to the discussion group. If you can't stick to the rules, you will be banned from the group. In the meantime, your post has been removed. Best regards, On May 17, 9:45 pm, "" <michaelrana...@gmail.com> wrote: View profile, More options May 18, 6:38 am Then you need to remove Charlie's reference to me as well. "Please post short messages and talk about the issues and suggested solutions, not about individuals. If you post information, please provide a link to the source.' What's good for the goose and all... On May 17, 11:16 pm, Nae <hemin...@gmail.com> wrote: Discussion subject changed to "Michael Ranallo abuse of discussion grou P RESLAN View profile More options May 18, 9:24 am ; Thanks for instituting the guidelines for Mr. Michael Ranallo who is adamant about using this discussion group for his personal attacks. Following the guidelines is what all participant's adhere to as the rules are simple stated! As adults we teach our children to follow rules, and we ignore them ourselves. It is a shame that Mr. Ranallo can't restrain himself and contain his remarks and just contact the person directly. Pattie Reslan

5 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Google... Page 5 of 12 he is using two addresses which I have listed below for the records of the group: michaelrana...@gmail.com & Pattie Reslan From: <michaelrana...@gmail.com> To: West Windsor Community Discussion <WWCommunityDiscussion@googlegroups.com> Sent: Sunday, May 17, :23:47 PM Subject: Re: Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage., What I posted was far from negative. If a FREE parking garage is in the best interests of WW residents, and the campaign promise was more than vapor, it is something that should happen regardless of the outcome of the election. Charlie's campaign hinged heavily on this FREE garage/parking and I was wondering if this is something that will see the light of day or was a "good only if I am elected" promise. Not negative but inquisitive. Well, maybe only about as negative as your post regarding a 0% tax increase. On May 17, 1:51 pm, Nae <hemin...@gmail.com> wrote: View profile Pattie, More options May 18, 10:13 am I think your definition of "personal attack" needs some refining. A "personal attack" would be me posting something like, "Charlie is an alcoholic who should not hold public office." This is of course not a proven fact and only an extreme example to illustrate my point. I am not implying this is fact at all. It is an example. What I did was comment on Charlie's political promises during his campaign in an attempt to hold him accountable moving forward. I will not go into detail about how Mr. Morgan's posts to this group during election season violated the "guidelines" of this group. You can research his contributions and see for yourself. Can we at least agree that he at the very least went above and beyond the "please post short messages" rule more than a single time?

6 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Google... Page 6 of 12 Why was that portion of the "rules" ignored? His rants about Shing's foundation stepped way over the "strictly for information" line and dove headfirst into the realm of political theater. I make no effort to hide either I use, and always sign my name with my address attached so I do not understand what public service you think you have performed by adding them, but thanks I guess. If people do not agree with what I wrote, that is fine. Censorship is not fine. If the rules apply across the board as you would like them to, then they should be applied evenly to all, and not bent for those that happen to be "in favor." Do you agree? michaaelrana...@gmail.com On May 18, 9:24 am, P RESLAN <res...@verizon.net> wrote: Nae View profile More options May 18, 10:39 am Mike: Your view is different from the that of the group's members. Your rant about Charlie does not belong here. You should consider leaving this group and airing your frustration somewhere else. As the manager of the group, I have allowed longer posts as long as they have contributed relevant information to the discussion and as long as they do not contain personal attacks. You have failed twice to adhere to the rules. I am asking you again to stop the attacks - three strikes and you are out. I am still looking forward to your constructive participation with suggestions and relevant information about the issues. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Best,

7 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Google... Page 7 of 12 P RESLAN View profile More options May 18, 10:44 am Dear Mike; If there were prior personal attacks, like always seems to take place during an election, they too are unacceptable. I am not a monitor, just a participant. We are all human, and things escape us from time to time. Pattie Reslan res...@verizon.net From: <michaelrana...@gmail.com> To: West Windsor Community Discussion <WWCommunityDiscussion@googlegroups.com> Sent: Monday, May 18, :13:47 AM Subject: Re: Michael Ranallo abuse of discussion group rules Pattie, I think your definition of "personal attack" needs some refining. A "personal attack" would be me posting something like, "Charlie is an alcoholic who should not hold public office." This is of course not a proven fact and only an extreme example to illustrate my point. I am not implying this is fact at all. It is an example. What I did was comment on Charlie's political promises during his campaign in an attempt to hold him accountable moving forward. I will not go into detail about how Mr. Morgan's posts to this group during election season violated the "guidelines" of this group. You can research his contributions and see for yourself. Can we at least agree that he at the very least went above and beyond the "please post short messages" rule more than a single time? Why was that portion of the "rules" ignored? His rants about Shing's foundation stepped way over the "strictly for information" line and dove headfirst into the realm of political theater. I make no effort to hide either I use, and always sign my name with my address attached so I do not understand what public service you think you have performed by adding them, but thanks I guess. If people do not agree with what I wrote, that is fine. Censorship is not fine. If the rules apply across the board as you would like them to, then they should be applied evenly to all, and not bent for those that happen to be "in favor." Do you agree?

8 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Google... Page 8 of 12 michaaelrana...@gmail.com On May 18, 9:24 am, P RESLAN <res...@verizon.net> wrote: P RESLAN View profile More options May 18, 10:47 am Dear ; Unfortunately some of us lack self control. Sorry for things that happen that make open forums a punching bag!!! Always appreciative of your work, insight and leadership. Regards, Pattie Reslan res...@verizon.net From: Nae <hemin...@gmail.com To: WWCommunityDiscussion@googlegroups.com Sent: Monday, May 18, :39:38 AM Subject: Re: Michael Ranallo abuse of discussion group rules Mike: Your view is different from the that of the group's members. Your rant about Charlie does not belong here. You should consider leaving this group and airing your frustration somewhere else. As the manager of the group, I have allowed longer posts as long as they have contributed relevant information to the discussion and as long as they do not contain personal attacks. You have failed twice to adhere to the rules. I am asking you again to stop the attacks - three strikes and you are out. I am still looking forward to your constructive participation with suggestions and relevant information about the issues. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Best, On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:13 AM, <michaelrana...@gmail.com> wrote: Pattie, I think your definition of "personal attack" needs some refining. A "personal attack" would be me posting something like, "Charlie is an alcoholic who should not hold public office." This is of course not a proven fact and only an extreme example to illustrate my point. I am not implying this is fact at all. It is an example. What I did was comment on Charlie's political promises during his campaign in an attempt to hold him accountable moving forward.

9 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Google... Page 9 of 12 I will not go into detail about how Mr. Morgan's posts to this group during election season violated the "guidelines" of this group. You can research his contributions and see for yourself. Can we at least agree that he at the very least went above and beyond the "please post short messages" rule more than a single time? Why was that portion of the "rules" ignored? His rants about Shing's foundation stepped way over the "strictly for information" line and dove headfirst into the realm of political theater. I make no effort to hide either I use, and always sign my name with my address attached so I do not understand what public service you think you have performed by adding them, but thanks I guess. If people do not agree with what I wrote, that is fine. Censorship is not fine. If the rules apply across the board as you would like them to, then they should be applied evenly to all, and not bent for those that happen to be "in favor." Do you agree? michaaelrana...@gmail.com On May 18, 9:24 am, P RESLAN <res...@verizon.net> wrote: Discussion subject changed to "Charlie Morgan and FREE parking garage P RESLAN View profile More options May 18, 11:12 am Rant- noun - 1. to speak or declaim extravagantly or violently; talk in a wild or vehement way; rave... as written in the Random House Webster's College Dictionary., I agree with you point and Michael, a different point of view, is just that, a different point of view. Personal attacks are carried out in private, not public. Respect for others is being ignored. Thanks for your reminders! Pattie Reslan res...@verizon.net From: <michaelrana...@gmail.com> To: West Windsor Community Discussion

10 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Goo... Page 10 of 12 <WWCommunityDiscussion@googlegroups.com> Sent: Monday, May 18, :02:35 AM Subject: Re: Charlie Morgan and FREE parking garage election promise, If I understand you correctly, my view is "different" so it does not belong? My original post was far from a "rant." If you go back and read it, it was intended to follow up on on election time promise. There was no attack or rant in my original post. I suggest you refine this groups definition of "attack". ***To Pattie: So things "escape us from time to time" when it pertains to Charlie Morgan and his writings, but in regards to what I write, "it's a shame" how I behave? You are a hypocrite. michaelrana...@gmail.com On May 18, 10:39 am, Nae <hemin...@gmail.com> wrote: Nae View profile Hi everybody: More options May 18, 11:31 am Apparently, Mike still does not understand the rules of this group and continues to rant about his attacks. Maybe I should have explained to him that I meant that his "view" on rants is different from that of the other members, not his personal views on the issues, which are fine as long as he presents them in a friendly and constructive way. His new attack on Pattie, calling her "hypocrite" is unacceptable and therefore I am removing him from the group. Best regards, On May 18, 11:02 am, "" <michaelrana...@gmail.com> wrote: Doodka View profile More options May 18, 11:39 am

11 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Goo... Page 11 of 12 Mike, Try to imagine you get an like the one u wrote to Charlie, CC'ing many others. Would this then b considered an attack? The worst thing one can do is to attack/insult/criticize someone else in public. You did and it does not meet this group rules, as set by. -- Regards, David Nae View profile More options May 18, 11:54 am Doodka: I would agree with you if it had shown up on the group's discussion. If you could please check the message I sent, you can see that it was sent privately to undisclosed recipients. The elections are over. I hope we can all continue now to constructively discuss issues and not personalities. Thank you. Best, Nae View profile Doodka: More options May 18, 12:09 pm Sorry, I should have said the following: "I agree with Doodka. If Mike's message had not shown up on the group's discussion it might be OK as a private message, even though I would not use his unacceptable way of accusations and name calling. If you could please check the message that I sent before the elections, you can see that it was sent privately to undisclosed recipients. The elections are over. I hope we can all continue now to constructively discuss issues and not personalities.

12 Charlie Morgan's FREE parking garage. - West Windsor Community Discussion Goo... Page 12 of 12 Thank you." On May 18, 11:54 am, Nae <hemin...@gmail.com> wrote: End of messages «Back to Discussions «Newer topic Older topic» Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy 2009 Google