Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert"

Transcription

1 PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #1 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 2-8. Please write your answers clearly in the blanks provided for each question. Matching & fill-in-the-blank questions are 1 point each; short answer questions are 3 points each. Full credit on short answer questions is given only if you express your answers in your own words. Some questions may have more than one acceptable answer. Partial credit may be given for answers that are on the right track. If you re not sure, guessing is better than leaving a question blank. The maximum score is 90 points. Philosopher X writes these sentences (I and II) in the introduction of her essay: I. In this essay I argue that Smith s view that empathy is the basis of morality is incorrect. II. I will also defend my own claim that morality implanted in our heads by space aliens. 1A. Which sentence describes X s positive view? 1B. Which sentence describes X s negative view? 2A. A claim, if it is not accompanied by reasons one should believe the claim is true, merely expresses an author s on a topic; 2B. in order to form an argument, one must supply for the view captured in the claim. 2C. The reasons one gives to support a claim are called when they are stated in the form of a proposition (a phrase that can stand alone as a sentence). 3A. If you find something wrong with an argument, it is appropriate to raise an against it, spelling out the error you see in the author s reasoning. For 4A & 4B, name two things you can do in response to an argument after you ve found and articulated a particular flaw in it. 4A. In 5A-5D, for each of the following arguments, Ø write P if the underlined phrase functions as a premise, or write C if underlined phrase functions as the argument s conclusion. 5A. Since there is a distinction between weather patterns and climate, one cannot deny global warming merely by pointing to how many very cold days we had this winter. 5B. We all ought to swipe our Metrocards to ride the subway because the MTA relies on revenue from Metrocard sales to make improvements to the system. 5C. It s important to recognize the contributions of all Americans to cultural heritage of the United States, therefore we pay special homage to black Americans during Black History Month. 5D. It is perhaps more imperative than ever that we acknowledge how our country relies upon immigrant labor, given that many Americans are concerned about and even afraid of the US s increasing ethnic diversity. For 6A-6F, write the letter corresponding to the name of the fallacy next to the example of that fallacy. a) Ad Hominem Attack e) Appeal to Emotion b) Anecdotal Evidence f) Appeal to Status c) Appeal to Authority g) Appeal to Tradition 6A. Don t take more food than you ll eat: think of all the starving children in Africa. 6B. We shouldn t eat at that restaurant; I heard one of their waiters is really rude. 6C. I should buy a gluten-free muffin. because Oprah says eating gluten is bad for your health. 6D. We can t trust anything Karl Marx said because he s a communist. 6E. We couldn t possibly elect a female president; the president has always been a man. 6F. The aliens are arriving tonight. Believe me: I m a multi-billionaire. 4B.

2 For each of the following sentences (7A-7F), fill in the blank with the best option from the word bank. auxiliary argument begs the question confirmation bias non sequitur questionable warranted 7A. Jamie wasn t convinced by argument K, because its claim that babies don t experience anything in the womb seemed to be a assumption, for which there is no general consensus among knowledgeable people. 7B. Jeff s assessment of argument Z is that since alternative conclusions could also be drawn from the same premises, Z commits a, jumping to a particular conclusion without ruling out other options. 7C. Adrian read up on recent neuroscientific studies before stating in his argument that the brain changes in response to experience, in order to make sure that this claim was a assumption, backed by the consensus of contemporary neuroscientists. 7D. Linda realized that argument H was flawed because one of its premises assumed exactly what the author aimed to conclude. Thus, argument H is circular, or in other words, it. 7E. Since Jessica wasn t sure that premise 3 of her argument would be obviously true to all of her readers, she decided to provide a(n) to support it. 7F. Gerald objected to argument Q, saying that it exhibits : it only seems plausible because the author ignored a wealth of counterevidence and selectively pointed to a small bit of evidence in favor of the conclusion. 8. Fallacix is marketed as a miracle drug that solves financial problems. Andy rushes out to the pharmacy to buy Fallacix, and takes it every day for a month. At the end of the month, Andy gets a big raise at work. Andy raves about the drug, saying that it really does solve financial problems, as promised in the commercials. What logical error has Andy made? For 10A-10F, write the letter corresponding to the name of the fallacy next to the example of that fallacy. a) Bandwagon Fallacy d) Red Herring b) False Analogy e) Slippery Slope c) Hasty Generalization f) Strawman 10A. Those gun control activists just want to leave us all without any defenses against foreign military attacks. 10B. Smoking is good for your health, because it makes you look mature and mysterious. 10C. If we grant legal rights to human fetuses, then it ll be illegal to eat omelettes because we d be violating the rights of unborn chickens. 10D. Our visitor is British, so she will surely be expecting tea and crumpets for breakfast. 10E. You pay for college just like you pay for a good meal. If the customer is always right in a restaurant, then the student s always right at college. 10F. Suicide Squad grossed over 745 million in ticket sales, so it must be a superb instance of cinematic artistry. 11A. A good argument gives us adequate reason to believe its conclusion is. 11B. The conclusion of a fallacious argument is not sufficiently supported, but that doesn t necessarily mean that it is. 12A. Researchers who want to draw conclusions about a large population (who cannot test or survey the entire population) ought to collect data from a which has demographics resembling that of the whole population. 12B. The trouble with a sample which is too is that it leads researchers to draw hasty conclusions from a very limited data set. 12C. It s important that researchers use a sample from the whole population, in which every member has equal chance of being selected otherwise, the sample might be biased. 2

3 13. Grades would be a poorly-chosen for measuring students intelligence, since one student (A) having higher grades than another (B) does not reliably indicate that A is smarter than B. 14. One should be careful when considering premises containing statistics that give the mathematical of a data set, since that figure can fail to capture how the data is distributed, and whether or not there were outliers. Questions 15A & 15B concern the following argument: 1. The percentage of first-year Baruch students who are from Staten Island doubled from 3% to 6% from fall 2015 to fall There were twice as many instances of bicycle theft at Baruch in fall 2016 as there were in fall Therefore, students from Staten Island are bicycle thieves. 15A. Premise 2 is an instance of a manipulative use of statistics called : since it leaves out the actual number of incidents of bike theft in these two years, it s ambiguous whether this was a significant increase or not. 15B. Name a fallacy that the argument commits (there are several options) and explain how this pattern of reasoning exemplifies that fallacy. For 16A-H, match each ism to its description. a) moral anti-realism e) moral realism b) moral empiricism f) moral relativism c) moral nativism g) moral sentimentalism d) moral rationalism h) moral universalism 16A. The view that the capacity to judge what is right/wrong is something all humans are born with, i.e., part of our nature. 16B. The view that at least some moral values are shared by all human beings regardless of what community they belong to. 16C. The view that objective moral facts exist, and are either implemented by God or necessitated by nature (but either way, exist independently of human belief). 16D. The view that moral judgments ought to be made by consulting our emotions (e.g. pity for someone experiencing pain). 16E. The view that the capacity to judge right and wrong is acquired during our lifetimes through instruction and/or imitation. 216F. The view that there are no objective moral facts (but there might be subjective moral facts instead). 16G. The view that the truth of a moral principle depends upon the context in which you evaluate the principle. 16H. The view that our reason is the best guide for moral decision-making. 17. is the branch of moral philosophy that investigates the nature of morality. 18. Gilbert Harman suggests that we can learn something valuable about moral principles by contrasting them with scientific, which can be confirmed (shown to be correct) or disconfirmed (shown to be incorrect) using observation and experimentation. 3

4 19. The logical law of says nothing can simultaneously have opposite properties; it follows from this that any action X cannot be both right and wrong at the same time. 20A. Philosophers sometimes use involving fictional scenarios to help draw conclusions about challenging topics; 20B. However, the findings we get by using this strategy are, since some scenarios seem to confirm the principle while others disconfirm it. 21A. According to Harman, we can t use feelings about particular moral cases to learn the truth about morality, since we our feelings may not correspond to moral facts which hold independently of anyone s beliefs, thoughts, perspective, etc. 21B. Additionally, we can t actually perceive rightness/wrongness of actions, because these do not belong to the actions themselves, but instead are we make about those actions. 22. Explain what Harman means when he says that observations are always theory-laden, and why observing the world teaches us more about ourselves than it teaches us about morality. 23. Cultural relativism is often motivated by the breadth of moral in the world: the number and variety of moral codes across the world leads many people to believe that the idea of universal truth in ethics is a myth. 24. According to Rachels, disagreement about morality is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is no objective moral truth, because one party in the disagreement might just be about the objective truth. 25. Rachels uses a form of argument called a when he shows that cultural relativism is implausible because undesirable consequences would result from embracing that view as true. 26. Explain how Rachels example of the Eskimo practice of female infanticide illustrates his point that it is easy to overestimate the extent of [moral] differences between cultures if we judge cultures on the basis of their customs. 27. Rachels demonstrates that the belief that there are no moral truths that hold for all peoples at all times results from a mistaken assumption that cultural differences in customs must signify differences in moral. 28. He suggests that some moral rules are shared by all cultures because they are necessary for the of human populations. 4

5 29. One thing that cultural relativists get right, from Rachels perspective, is that they encourage us to be open-minded about morality instead of succumbing to, meaning unwillingness to modify one s beliefs. 30A. Adam Smith noted how remarkable it is that all human beings feel when we see another person suffering, even when that person is a total stranger 30B. He specified that our is what makes it possible for us to put ourselves in another person s shoes and gain insight into another person s feelings. 31. While Smith believes that being able to feel with other people always leads us to behave ethically, Paul Bloom argues that for others is unlikely to help us (and sometimes even counterproductive) when it comes to tackling large-scale, and enduring moral issues without visible victims. 32. Bloom shows that empathy can be used as a tool to promote division among groups of people. Give your own example of a dispute where proponents of opposing views attempt to inspire empathy for particular victims in order to promote a particular social/political agenda. 33. justice is an approach to ethics where help we offer to others (including volunteering efforts, charitable donations, government assistance) should be proportionate to how much they need our help. For 34A-C, Ø write N for necessary or S for sufficient in each blank to form complete, logical sentences. 34A. Being female is a condition, but not a condition, for being a sister. 34B. Eating a hamburger could be a condition, but not a condition, for satisfying one s hunger. 34C. Many people take for granted that having free will is a condition for having moral responsibility. 35A. In order to have free will, our choices would have to be the of our actions; 35B. whether or not is true (that is, whether or not everything happens the way it does as the inevitable consequence of preceding events), it seems unlikely that really we have free will. 36. According to Galen Strawson, why is it logically impossible for us to be morally responsible for our actions and why should we nevertheless continue to hold ourselves and others morally responsible? 5

6 37. A is a situation where we are stuck between two alternatives, both of which have undesirable consequences. 38. Fascinatingly, Milgram s experiment demonstrated that the mere that someone has authority over us can significantly impact our behavior. 39. Philosopher Hannah Arendt coined the phrase to describe the upsetting idea that extremely immoral acts can be committed by totally ordinary people, and not just by monstrous, sadistic individuals. 40A. One of the psychological strategies people adopted to cope with the conflict between their moral convictions and the command of an authority figure is to their victims, treating them as if they are naturally inferior & deserving of mistreatment; 40B. however, since people do this to victims as a consequence of acting against them, it seems to be a : an attempt to retroactively justify one s mistreatment of others by fabricating a false story about why mistreatment was warranted. 41A. is a view of human behavior according to which the way a person acts has little to do with their moral character, but rather depends on the circumstances in which they find themselves. 41B. Another way to look at this view of human behavior is to say that our actions are subject to determinism, once again challenging the commonplace idea that we act according to our own free will. * END OF EXAM * 6

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #1 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 2-7. Please write your answers clearly

More information

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #1 Instructions Answer as many questions as you are able to. Please write your answers clearly in the blanks provided.

More information

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

PHI 1700: Global Ethics PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 3 February 11th, 2016 Harman, Ethics and Observation 1 (finishing up our All About Arguments discussion) A common theme linking many of the fallacies we covered is that

More information

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

PHI 1700: Global Ethics PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 2 February 4th, 2016 All About Arguments (Philosophy Basics) 1 What is an argument? Arguments are like the currency of philosophy: they are what philosophers exchange to

More information

Common Logical Fallacies

Common Logical Fallacies Common Logical Fallacies Effective arguments rely on logic and facts for support, yet speakers and authors, whether intentionally or unintentionally, can mislead an audience with a flaw in reasoning. Readers

More information

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws. Fallacies 1. Hasty generalization Definition: Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or too small). Stereotypes about

More information

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2 AICE Thinking kills Review How to Master Paper 2 Important Things to Remember You are given 1 hour and 45 minutes for Paper 2 You should spend approximately 30 minutes on each question Write neatly! Read

More information

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #2 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 8-15. Matching and fill-in-the-blank questions

More information

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies 1 Learning Outcomes In this lesson we will: 1.Define logical fallacy using the SEE-I. 2.Understand and apply the concept of relevance. 3.Define,

More information

Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments

Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments 1 Agenda 1. Reductio Ad Absurdum 2. Burden of Proof 3. Argument by Analogy 4. Bad Forms of Arguments 1. Begging the Question

More information

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope Fallacies in logic Hasty Generalization Definition: Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or just too small). Stereotypes

More information

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics 2012 Cengage Learning All Rights reserved Learning Outcomes LO 1 Explain how important moral reasoning is and how to apply it. LO 2 Explain the difference between facts

More information

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to

More information

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

PHI 1700: Global Ethics PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 5 September 13 th, 2018 Metaethics: Rationalism vs. Sentimentalism 1 Today s topic is an enduring question in moral psychology: Do we make moral judgments using our reason,

More information

USF MASTERS OF SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF FOUNDATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES LAST COMPLETED ON 4/30/17

USF MASTERS OF SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF FOUNDATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES LAST COMPLETED ON 4/30/17 USF MASTERS OF SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF FOUNDATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES LAST COMPLETED ON 4/30/17 This form is used to assist the COA in the evaluation of the program s compliance with the

More information

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument Vs Persuasion Everything s an argument, really. Argument: appeals strictly by reason and logic Persuasion: logic and emotion The forum of your argument

More information

Ethical Relativism 1. Ethical Relativism: Ethical Relativism: subjective objective ethical nihilism Ice cream is good subjective

Ethical Relativism 1. Ethical Relativism: Ethical Relativism: subjective objective ethical nihilism Ice cream is good subjective Ethical Relativism 1. Ethical Relativism: In this lecture, we will discuss a moral theory called ethical relativism (sometimes called cultural relativism ). Ethical Relativism: An action is morally wrong

More information

All About Arguments. I. What is an Argument? II. Identifying an Author s Argument

All About Arguments. I. What is an Argument? II. Identifying an Author s Argument All About Arguments PHI 1700: Global Ethics I. What is an Argument? In philosophy, an argument is not a dispute or debate; rather, it is a structured defense of a claim (that is, a statement or assertion)

More information

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims. Basics of Argument and Rhetoric Although arguing, speaking our minds, and getting our points across are common activities for most of us, applying specific terminology to these activities may not seem

More information

Ethics is subjective.

Ethics is subjective. Introduction Scientific Method and Research Ethics Ethical Theory Greg Bognar Stockholm University September 22, 2017 Ethics is subjective. If ethics is subjective, then moral claims are subjective in

More information

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16 LOGIC Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning Arguments reason from the specific to the general. It is important because this reasoning is based on what we learn from our experiences. Specific observations

More information

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around

More information

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition Argumentative Fallacies The Logic of Writing and Debate from http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.html

More information

PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES

PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES Philosophy SECTION I: Program objectives and outcomes Philosophy Educational Objectives: The objectives of programs in philosophy are to: 1. develop in majors the ability

More information

This handout discusses common types of philosophy assignments and strategies and resources that will help you write your philosophy papers.

This handout discusses common types of philosophy assignments and strategies and resources that will help you write your philosophy papers. The Writing Center Philosophy Like 2 people like this. What this handout is about This handout discusses common types of philosophy assignments and strategies and resources that will help you write your

More information

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers Diagram and evaluate each of the following arguments. Arguments with Definitional Premises Altruism. Altruism is the practice of doing something solely because

More information

APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES

APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES Critical thinking is reasonable and reflective thinking aimed at deciding what to believe and what to do. Throughout this book, we have identified mistakes that a

More information

Logical (formal) fallacies

Logical (formal) fallacies Fallacies in academic writing Chad Nilep There are many possible sources of fallacy an idea that is mistakenly thought to be true, even though it may be untrue in academic writing. The phrase logical fallacy

More information

What an argument is not

What an argument is not Expectations: As you go through this information on argumentation, you need to take notes in some fashion. You may simply print this document and bring it with you to class. You may also take notes like

More information

Ethical universal: An ethical truth that is true at all times and places.

Ethical universal: An ethical truth that is true at all times and places. Relativism Some Definitions Ethics: The philosophical inquiry into right and wrong and valuation through critical examination of human practices. Ethical universal: An ethical truth that is true at all

More information

PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY

PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY Paper 9774/01 Introduction to Philosophy and Theology Key Messages Most candidates gave equal treatment to three questions, displaying good time management and excellent control

More information

SPRING 2014 UNDERGRADUATE COURSE OFFERINGS

SPRING 2014 UNDERGRADUATE COURSE OFFERINGS SPRING 2014 UNDERGRADUATE COURSE OFFERINGS APHI 110 - Introduction to Philosophical Problems (#2318) TuTh 11:45AM 1:05PM Location: HU- 20 Instructor: Daniel Feuer This course is an introduction to philosophy

More information

Relativism and Subjectivism. The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards

Relativism and Subjectivism. The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards Relativism and Subjectivism The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards Starting with a counter argument 1.The universe operates according to laws 2.The universe can be investigated through the use of both

More information

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand), Doc Holley s Logical Fallacies In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise

More information

Philosophy Courses Fall 2016

Philosophy Courses Fall 2016 Philosophy Courses Fall 2016 All 100 and 200-level philosophy courses satisfy the Humanities requirement -- except 120, 198, and 298. We offer both a major and a minor in philosophy plus a concentration

More information

Full file at

Full file at Chapter 1 What is Philosophy? Summary Chapter 1 introduces students to main issues and branches of philosophy. The chapter begins with a basic definition of philosophy. Philosophy is an activity, and addresses

More information

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion. ACADEMIC SKILLS THINKING CRITICALLY In the everyday sense of the word, critical has negative connotations. But at University, Critical Thinking is a positive process of understanding different points of

More information

Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center

Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center The Writing Center Fallacies Like 40 people like this. What this handout is about This handout discusses common logical fallacies that you may encounter in your own writing or the writing of others. The

More information

The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. James Rachels 1986 Ethics & Contemporary Issues Professor Douglas Olena

The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. James Rachels 1986 Ethics & Contemporary Issues Professor Douglas Olena The Challenge of Cultural Relativism James Rachels 1986 Ethics & Contemporary Issues Professor Douglas Olena Different Moral Codes *How Different Cultures Have Different Moral Codes Darius, King of Persia

More information

Boghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori

Boghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori Boghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori PHIL 83104 November 2, 2011 Both Boghossian and Harman address themselves to the question of whether our a priori knowledge can be explained in

More information

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley A Decision Making and Support Systems Perspective by Richard Day M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley look to change

More information

Can Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn. Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor,

Can Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn. Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor, Can Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor, Cherniak and the Naturalization of Rationality, with an argument

More information

Why Ethics? Lightly Edited Transcript with Slides. Introduction

Why Ethics? Lightly Edited Transcript with Slides. Introduction Why Ethics? Part 1 of a Video Tutorial on Business Ethics Available on YouTube and itunes University Recorded 2012 by John Hooker Professor, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University Lightly

More information

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens. INTRODUCTION TO LOGICAL THINKING Lecture 6: Two types of argument and their role in science: Deduction and induction 1. Deductive arguments Arguments that claim to provide logically conclusive grounds

More information

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading Developed by Jamie A. Hughes, South Campus Learning Center, Communications Lab 04-25-05 Permission to copy and use is granted to all FCCJ staff provided this

More information

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase post hoc, ergo propter hoc, which translates as after this, therefore because of this. So what do fallacies look like? For each fallacy listed, there is a definition or explanation, an example, and a tip on how to avoid committing the fallacy in your own arguments. Hasty generalization Definition:

More information

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW [JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW Craig S. Keener, Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts (2 vols.; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011). xxxviii + 1172 pp. Hbk. US$59.99. Craig Keener

More information

Bellwork Friday November 18th

Bellwork Friday November 18th Bellwork Friday November 18th In your Writing Journal please respond to the following prompt: What is the most ridiculous argument you have heard? Remember this is NOT fight argument. I m talking trying

More information

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7 Portfolio Project Phil 251A Logic Fall 2012 Due: Friday, December 7 1 Overview The portfolio is a semester-long project that should display your logical prowess applied to real-world arguments. The arguments

More information

THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY Undergraduate Course Outline PHIL3501G: Epistemology

THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY Undergraduate Course Outline PHIL3501G: Epistemology THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY Undergraduate Course Outline 2016 PHIL3501G: Epistemology Winter Term 2016 Tues. 1:30-2:30 p.m. Thursday 1:30-3:30 p.m. Location: TBA Instructor:

More information

Why Ethics? Lightly Edited Transcript with Slides. Introduction

Why Ethics? Lightly Edited Transcript with Slides. Introduction Why Ethics? Part 1 of a Video Tutorial on Business Ethics Available on YouTube and itunes University Recorded 2012 by John Hooker Professor, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University Lightly

More information

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

PHI 1700: Global Ethics PHI 1700: Global Ethics Baruch College, Fall 2018 time: Friday 9:00-10:25am section: BTRA, credits: 3.0, room: TBA course website: bit.ly/phi1700f18 instructor: Lauren R. Alpert email: lauren.r.alpert@gmail.com

More information

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Precising definition Theoretical definition Persuasive definition Syntactic definition Operational definition 1. Are questions about defining a phrase

More information

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 1 What Is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life CHAPTER SUMMARY Philosophy is a way of thinking that allows one to think more deeply about one s beliefs and about meaning in life. It

More information

Fallacies. What this handout is about. Arguments. What are fallacies?

Fallacies. What this handout is about. Arguments. What are fallacies? The Writing Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb Fallacies What this handout is about This handout is on common logical fallacies that you may encounter in

More information

Contemporary Social and Moral Problems in the U.S.

Contemporary Social and Moral Problems in the U.S. Contemporary Social and Moral Problems in the U.S. Philosophy 2367 Fall 2013 Ohio State University Instructor: Dr. Lindsay Rettler, Time and Location: Wed/Fri 8:00-9:20 am, 259 Hagerty Hall Contact: rettler.2@osu.edu

More information

Detachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood

Detachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood Detachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood GILBERT HARMAN PRINCETON UNIVERSITY When can we detach probability qualifications from our inductive conclusions? The following rule may seem plausible:

More information

Topic III: Sexual Morality

Topic III: Sexual Morality PHILOSOPHY 1100 INTRODUCTION TO ETHICS FINAL EXAMINATION LIST OF POSSIBLE QUESTIONS (1) As is indicated in the Final Exam Handout, the final examination will be divided into three sections, and you will

More information

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because. Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches

More information

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments) The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments) Adapted from: An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments: Learn the lost art of making sense by Ali Almossawi *Not, by any stretch of the imagination,

More information

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image Welcome to class Quick Write # 11 Create a narrative for the following image Day 17 Agenda Quick Write # 11 Peer editing Review Autobiographical Narrative reading Book Club presentations Peer Editing

More information

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? . What is the purpose of argumentation? Argumentation 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? According to Toulmin (964), the checking list can be outlined as follows: () The Claim

More information

Chapter 2. Moral Reasoning. Chapter Overview. Learning Objectives. Teaching Suggestions

Chapter 2. Moral Reasoning. Chapter Overview. Learning Objectives. Teaching Suggestions Chapter 2 Moral Reasoning Chapter Overview This chapter provides students with the tools necessary for analyzing and constructing moral arguments. It also builds on Chapter 1 by encouraging students to

More information

Philosophy Courses Fall 2011

Philosophy Courses Fall 2011 Philosophy Courses Fall 2011 All philosophy courses satisfy the Humanities requirement -- except 120, which counts as one of the two required courses in Math/Logic. Many philosophy courses (e.g., Business

More information

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS The Extended Investigation Critical Thinking Test assesses the ability of students to produce arguments, and to analyse and assess

More information

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument General Overview: As our students often attest, we all live in a complex world filled with demanding issues and bewildering challenges. In order to determine those

More information

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? - My boss - The shareholders - Other stakeholders - Basic principles about conduct and its impacts - What is good for me - What

More information

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 1. Demonstrate the importance of ethics as part of the persuasion process. 2. Identify and provide examples of eight common

More information

Reliabilism: Holistic or Simple?

Reliabilism: Holistic or Simple? Reliabilism: Holistic or Simple? Jeff Dunn jeffreydunn@depauw.edu 1 Introduction A standard statement of Reliabilism about justification goes something like this: Simple (Process) Reliabilism: S s believing

More information

Answers to Practice Problems 7.3

Answers to Practice Problems 7.3 Answers to Practice Problems 7.3 Identify the fallacy in each statement or exchange. 1. Jim says that it is bad to invest in bonds right now. What does he know; he s just a janitor! d. equivocation 2.

More information

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics

More information

The Rightness Error: An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism

The Rightness Error: An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism Mathais Sarrazin J.L. Mackie s Error Theory postulates that all normative claims are false. It does this based upon his denial of moral

More information

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111) Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111) Neils Bohr (1885 1962) to Einstein: You are not thinking. You are merely being logical. Reason is one of the four ways of knowing: Perception Language Emotion

More information

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an opponent of utilitarianism. Basic Summary: Kant, unlike Mill, believed that certain types of actions (including murder,

More information

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Session 3 September 9 th, 2015 All About Arguments (Part II) 1 A common theme linking many fallacies is that they make unwarranted assumptions. An assumption is a claim

More information

Realism and instrumentalism

Realism and instrumentalism Published in H. Pashler (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of the Mind (2013), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 633 636 doi:10.4135/9781452257044 mark.sprevak@ed.ac.uk Realism and instrumentalism Mark Sprevak

More information

What should I believe? What should I believe when people disagree with me?

What should I believe? What should I believe when people disagree with me? What should I believe? What should I believe when people disagree with me? Imagine that you are at a horse track with a friend. Two horses, Whitey and Blacky, are competing for the lead down the stretch.

More information

In his pithy pamphlet Free Will, Sam Harris. Defining free will away EDDY NAHMIAS ISN T ASKING FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE. reviews/harris

In his pithy pamphlet Free Will, Sam Harris. Defining free will away EDDY NAHMIAS ISN T ASKING FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE. reviews/harris Defining free will away EDDY NAHMIAS ISN T ASKING FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE Free Will by Sam Harris (The Free Press),. /$. 110 In his pithy pamphlet Free Will, Sam Harris explains why he thinks free will is an

More information

PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT

PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT UNDERGRADUATE HANDBOOK 2013 Contents Welcome to the Philosophy Department at Flinders University... 2 PHIL1010 Mind and World... 5 PHIL1060 Critical Reasoning... 6 PHIL2608 Freedom,

More information

Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism

Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Cognitivism, Non-cognitivism, and the Humean Argument

More information

Level 2 Award Thinking and Reasoning Skills. Mark Scheme for January Unit B902: Thinking and Reasoning Skills Case Study.

Level 2 Award Thinking and Reasoning Skills. Mark Scheme for January Unit B902: Thinking and Reasoning Skills Case Study. Level 2 Award Thinking and Reasoning Skills Unit B902: Thinking and Reasoning Skills Case Study OCR Level 2 Award Mark Scheme for January 2017 Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations OCR (Oxford Cambridge

More information

World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.

World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea. Book reviews World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, by Michael C. Rea. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004, viii + 245 pp., $24.95. This is a splendid book. Its ideas are bold and

More information

Virtue Ethics without Character Traits

Virtue Ethics without Character Traits Virtue Ethics without Character Traits Gilbert Harman Princeton University August 18, 1999 Presumed parts of normative moral philosophy Normative moral philosophy is often thought to be concerned with

More information

Phil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority

Phil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority Phil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority The aims of On Liberty The subject of the work is the nature and limits of the power which

More information

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe. Overview Philosophy & logic 1.2 What is philosophy? 1.3 nature of philosophy Why philosophy Rules of engagement Punctuality and regularity is of the essence You should be active in class It is good to

More information

Peter Singer, Famine, Affluence, and Morality

Peter Singer, Famine, Affluence, and Morality Peter Singer, Famine, Affluence, and Morality As I write this, in November 1971, people are dying in East Bengal from lack of food, shelter, and medical care. The suffering and death that are occurring

More information

Session Two. The Critical Thinker s Toolkit

Session Two. The Critical Thinker s Toolkit Session Two The Critical Thinker s Toolkit Entailment and Strong Suggestion redux How can we distinguish entailment from strong suggestion? Ask yourself this: Is it possible for the statements in the

More information

Critical Thinking Questions

Critical Thinking Questions Critical Thinking Questions (partially adapted from the questions listed in The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking by Richard Paul and Linda Elder) The following questions can be used in two ways: to

More information

Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V

Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V UNIT V STUDY GUIDE Designing and Evaluating Your Own Learning Reading Assignment Chapter 8: Discover How the Best Thinkers Learn Chapter 9: Redefine Grades As Levels of Thinking and Learning Suggested

More information

The Art of Critical Thinking

The Art of Critical Thinking The Art of Critical Thinking It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -Aristotle Why Think Critically? Society is becoming more polarized every day. News

More information

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey Topics and Posterior Analytics Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey Logic Aristotle is the first philosopher to study systematically what we call logic Specifically, Aristotle investigated what we now

More information

Moral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary

Moral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,

More information

THE MORAL ARGUMENT. Peter van Inwagen. Introduction, James Petrik

THE MORAL ARGUMENT. Peter van Inwagen. Introduction, James Petrik THE MORAL ARGUMENT Peter van Inwagen Introduction, James Petrik THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSIONS of human freedom is closely intertwined with the history of philosophical discussions of moral responsibility.

More information

How to Argue Without Being Argumentative

How to Argue Without Being Argumentative How to Argue Without Being Argumentative We should first of all begin by explaining the title of this lecture: How to Argue Without Being Argumentative. Whenever people think of arguing or having an argument,

More information

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL? WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL? Beliefs don t trump facts in the real world. People almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.

More information

Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO. (aka Dihydrogen monoxide)

Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO. (aka Dihydrogen monoxide) Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO (aka Dihydrogen monoxide) DHMO.org Dihydrogen-monoxide (Transtronics site) Coalition to Ban DHMO Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide! DHMO Chemical Danger Alert - The Horror

More information

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26 Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26 Session will discuss on how to refute arguments more effectively. Tim Cook Salado High School Tim.cook@saladoisd.org Attention All Attendees:

More information

Epistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?

Epistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything? Epistemology a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (Dictionary.com v 1.1). Epistemology attempts to answer the question how do we know what

More information

Video Reaction. Opening Activity. Journal #16

Video Reaction. Opening Activity. Journal #16 Justification / explanation Interpretation / inference Methodologies / paradigms Verification / truth / certainty Argument / evaluation Evidence / data / facts / support / proof Limitations / uncertainties

More information

From Necessary Truth to Necessary Existence

From Necessary Truth to Necessary Existence Prequel for Section 4.2 of Defending the Correspondence Theory Published by PJP VII, 1 From Necessary Truth to Necessary Existence Abstract I introduce new details in an argument for necessarily existing

More information