1 Page 1 of 5 Source: Fair Employment Cases > U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit > Fallon v. Mercy Catholic Med. Ctr. of S. Pa. (3d Cir. 2017) Fallon v. Mercy Catholic Med. Ctr. of S. Pa. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No December 14, BL PAUL FALLON, Appellant v. MERCY CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, d/b/a Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital; JOHN DOES 1-10, Fictitious Names of Entities and/or Individuals Whose Identities are Presently Unknown, Individually, Jointly, Severally and/or in the Alternative Case History and Disposition On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (D. C. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00834). District Judge: Honorable Gerald J. Pappert. Attorneys Alan H. Schorr, Esquire (Argued), Schorr and Associates, Cherry Hill, NJ, Counsel for Appellant. Darren M. Creasy, Esquire, Andrea M. Kirshenbaum, Esquire (Argued), Post & Schell, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellee. Judge Before: SMITH, Chief Judge JORDAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges. Opinion Text ROTH ROTH, Circuit Judge: Paul Fallon was terminated by his employer, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, because he refused to be inoculated against flu. He opposed the flu vaccine because he believed that this vaccine might do more harm than good. However, Mercy Catholic required its employees to receive the flu vaccine unless they qualified for a medical or religious exemption. In 2014, Fallon sought the exemption on religious grounds. Mercy Catholic ruled that he did not qualify and terminated him when he continued to refuse the vaccine. Fallon sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 1 arguing that his termination constituted religious discrimination. The District Court dismissed his case with prejudice because his beliefs, while sincere and strongly held, were not religious in nature and, therefore, not protected by Title VII U.S.C. 2000e et seq. In deciding the case, the District Court considered the full text of an essay that was partially quoted in Fallon's complaint but not submitted in full until Mercy Catholic attached it to the reply brief in support of its motion to dismiss. Fallon now appeals, arguing that his beliefs are religious in nature. He also contends that only the portions of the essay, which were quoted in the complaint, should have been considered. Finally, he asserts that the dismissal should not have been with prejudice. We agree, however, with the District Court and will affirm. I. Background 2 2 Because this case was decided on a motion to dismiss, the following facts are drawn from the complaint. Fallon began his employment with Mercy Catholic as a Psychiatric Crisis Intake Worker in September In 2012, Mercy Catholic began requiring employees to obtain a flu vaccine or submit an exemption form to obtain a medical or religious exemption. Any employee granted an exemption was required to wear a mask as an
2 Page 2 of 5 accommodation. While Fallon does not belong to any religious organization, he holds strong personal beliefs, opposing the flu vaccine. In 2012 and 2013, Fallon sought and received religious exemptions, based on personal beliefs which he explained in a lengthy essay attached to his requests for exemption. In 2014, Fallon made a similar request for an exemption, again attaching his essay which he described throughout the complaint in this action, as explaining his sincerely held beliefs. 3 His request was denied. Mercy Catholic explained to Fallon that it had changed its standards for granting a religious exemption and that Fallon's submission no longer sufficed. Mercy Catholic requested a letter from a clergyperson to support his request for an exemption. Fallon could not provide one. Fallon was suspended and ultimately terminated on December 31, 2014, for failing to comply with the flu vaccine requirements. 3 App On February 19, 2016, Fallon filed a complaint against Mercy Catholic for, among other things, 4 religious discrimination and failure to accommodate in violation of Title VII. On June 1, 2016, Mercy Catholic filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Fallon's beliefs were not religious and therefore not protected under Title VII. Fallon opposed the motion to dismiss. Mercy Catholic submitted a reply brief and included, as an attachment, the twentytwo page essay that Fallon had attached to his request for religious accommodation in On July 26, the District Court held a two-hour hearing on the motion, at which Fallon argued that the District Court could not consider the full essay in relation to a motion to dismiss because the full essay was not part of the complaint. On August 9, 2016, partly on the basis of the full essay, the District Court granted Mercy Catholic's motion to dismiss. Because the District Court concluded that amendment would be futile, the dismissal was with prejudice. 4 Fallon also alleged wrongful termination on the basis of religion in violation of Title VII. The discrimination that he alleges is his termination so that his wrongful termination claim does not appear to be independent of his religious discrimination claim. He listed several other counts as well, but they were dismissed and Fallon does not appeal their dismissal. II. Discussion 5 5 Our review of the grant of a motion to dismiss is plenary. Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 206 (3d Cir. 2009). The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C A. Religious Discrimination Fallon argues that his complaint properly alleges religious discrimination in violation of Title VII. Title VII makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's religion. 6 According to the statutory definitions, [t]he term religion includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to an employee's or prospective employee's religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer's business U.S.C. 2000e-2(a)(1) U.S.C. 2000e(j). Under Title VII, in order to establish religious discrimination, the employee must have shown that (1) he held a sincere religious belief that conflicted with a job requirement, (2) he informed his employer of the conflict, and (3) he was disciplined for failing to comply with the conflicting requirement. 8 Here, Fallon held a sincere opposition to vaccination that conflicted with the requirement that he receive the flu vaccine, he informed Mercy Catholic of this conflict, and he was terminated for failing to comply with the vaccination requirement. Thus, we are left to consider only whether Fallon's opposition to vaccination is a religious belief under Title VII. If not, he has not pleaded a prima facie case. 9 8 Shelton v. Univ. of Med. & Dentistry of N.J., 223 F.3d 220, 224 (3d Cir. 2000). 9 Fallon's failure to accommodate claim also depends on Fallon's views being religious. See, e.g., Wilkerson v. New Media Tech. Charter Sch. Inc., 522 F.3d 315, 319 (3d Cir. 2008) ( To establish a prima facie case of a failure to accommodate claim, the employee must show she has a sincere religious belief that conflicts with a job requirement. ). 1. The Definition of Religion As we have acknowledged, [f]ew tasks that confront a court require more circumspection than that of determining whether a particular set of ideas constitutes a religion. 10 This task is particularly difficult when we have to determine whether a nontraditional faith requires the protections of the First Amendment and/or of Title VII.
3 Page 3 of 5 10 Africa v. Pennsylvania, 662 F.2d 1025, 1031 (3d Cir. 1981). In conducting our review, we bear in mind the history of the judicial definitions of religion. In United States v. Seeger, while interpreting a conscientious objector statute that exempted from conscription those whose religious training and belief made them opposed to war in any form, the Supreme Court put forward a standard for determining whether a belief is religious: [D]oes the claimed belief occupy the same place in the life of the objector as an orthodox belief in God holds in the life of one clearly qualified for exemption? 11 With this standard, the Court differentiated between those whose views were religious in nature and those whose views were essentially political, sociological, or philosophical. 12 The Court stated then, and has continued to reiterate ever since, that no court should inquire into the validity or plausibility of the beliefs; instead, the task of a court is to decide whether the beliefs professed by a registrant are sincerely held and whether they are, in [the believer's] own scheme of things, religious. 13 Applying the same test later in Welsh v. United States, the Court made clear that belief in God or divine beings was not necessary; nontheistic beliefs could also be religious within the meaning of the statute as long as they occupy in the life of that individual a place parallel to that filled by God in traditionally religious persons U.S. 163, 184, 85 S. Ct. 850, 13 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1965). 12 Id. at Id. at 185; see also Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751, 2779, 189 L. Ed. 2d 675 (2014) ( [I]t is not for us to say that [the believers'] religious beliefs are mistaken or insubstantial. ) U.S. 333, 340, 90 S. Ct. 1792, 26 L. Ed. 2d 308 (1970) (quoting Seeger, 380 U.S. at 176). Fallon, quoting 29 C.F.R , argues that religious beliefs are moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong that are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views. This argument is incorrect. The next sentence of the regulation describes the regulation as adopting the standard in Seeger and Welsh. Hence, we do not read the regulation to require only that the beliefs relate to what is right and wrong and be sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views. They must meet the standards in Seeger and Welsh. This Court has specifically considered how a belief may occupy a place parallel to that filled by God in traditionally religious persons. In Malnak v. Yogi, confronted with this question, Judge Adams in a concurrence investigated definitions of religion from the time of the Framing of the Constitution. These definitions tended to revolve around belief in God. 15 Finding them inadequate, Judge Adams proposed a modern definition of religion. 16 We later adopted this definition in Africa v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, describing it as follows: F.2d 197, 201 (3d Cir. 1979) (Adams, J., concurring). 16 Id. at First, a religion addresses fundamental and ultimate questions having to do with deep and imponderable matters. Second, a religion is comprehensive in nature; it consists of a beliefsystem as opposed to an isolated teaching. Third, a religion often can be recognized by the presence of certain formal and external signs F.2d at This definition has met with considerable agreement See Friedman v. S. Cal. Permanente Med. Grp., 102 Cal. App. 4th 39, 60-61, 125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 663 (2002) (listing cases). This definition is also in agreement with dictionary definitions. See, e.g., Black's Law Dictionary 1482 (10th ed. 2014) (defining religion as [a] system of faith and worship usu. involving belief in a supreme being and usu. containing a moral or ethical code; esp., such a system recognized and practiced by a particular church, sect, or denomination ); Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (11th ed.), available at (defining religious as relating to or manifesting faithful devotion to an acknowledged ultimate reality or deity ); Religious, Dictionary.com, (defining religion as a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs ) (last visited Oct. 31, 2017). 2. Fallon's Beliefs Under Africa, we must determine whether Fallon's beliefs address fundamental and ultimate questions having to do with deep and imponderable matters, are comprehensive in nature, and are accompanied by certain formal and external signs Africa, 662 F.2d at 1032.
4 Page 4 of 5 Fallon's beliefs are laid out in the complaint. First, he agrees with a quote, attributed to the founder of Buddhism: 20 App. 28. Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it. 20 He believes that one should not harm their [sic] own body and strongly believes that the flu vaccine may do more harm than good. 21 He concludes that if he yielded to coercion and consented to the hospital mandatory policy, he would violate his conscience as to what is right and what is wrong. Consequently, he must follow his conscience and refuse the influenza vaccine Id. 22 Id. It does not appear that these beliefs address fundamental and ultimate questions having to do with deep and imponderable matters, nor are they comprehensive in nature. Generally, he simply worries about the health effects of the flu vaccine, disbelieves the scientifically accepted view that it is harmless to most people, and wishes to avoid this vaccine. In particular, the basis of his refusal of the flu vaccine his concern that the flu vaccine may do more harm than good is a medical belief, not a religious one. He then applies one general moral commandment (which might be paraphrased as, Do not harm your own body ) to come to the conclusion that the flu vaccine is morally wrong. This one moral commandment is an isolated moral teaching ; by itself, it is not a comprehensive system of beliefs about fundamental or ultimate matters. 23 Thus, we do not believe that either of the first two factors in Africa is met here. 23 See Africa, 662 F.2d at Fallon fares no better under the third factor. Fallon's views are not manifested in formal and external signs, such as formal services, ceremonial functions, the existence of clergy, structure and organization, efforts at propagation, observation of holidays and other similar manifestations associated with the traditional religions Malnak, 592 F.2d at 209 (Adams, J., concurring). For this reason, because Fallon's beliefs do not satisfy any of the Africa factors, Fallon's beliefs do not occupy a place in his life similar to that occupied by a more traditional faith. His objection to vaccination is therefore not religious and not protected by Title VII. We note that we are not the only court to come to the conclusion that certain anti-vaccination beliefs are not religious. 25 This is not to say that anti-vaccination beliefs cannot be part of a broader religious faith; in some circumstances, they can, and in those circumstances, they are protected. 26 However, Fallon has not presented such circumstances here See Mason v. Gen. Brown Cent. Sch. Dist., 851 F.2d 47, 51 (2d Cir. 1988) (upholding as not clearly erroneous a district court finding that certain parents opposition to vaccination was based, not on religious grounds, but on scientific and secular theories ); Hanzel v. Arter, 625 F. Supp. 1259, 1260, 1265 (S.D. Ohio 1985) (describing a professed belief in chiropractic ethics" "a body of thought which teaches that injection of foreign substances into the body is of no benefit and can only be harmful" as philosophical rather than religious); McCartney v. Austin, 31 A.D.2d 370, 298 N.Y.S.2d 26, 27 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969) ( [A]ppellants opposition [to vaccination] whether or not predicated upon their personal moral scruples or upon medical concern is not upon religious grounds. ). 26 For example, Christian Scientists regularly qualify for exemptions from vaccination requirements. See, e.g., Boone v. Boozman, 217 F. Supp. 2d 938, 947 n.20 (E.D. Ark. 2002); Kolbeck v. Kramer, 84 N.J. Super. 569, 202 A.2d 889, 891 (N.J. Super. Law. Div. 1964). 27 Fallon makes much of the fact that Mercy Catholic requested a letter from a clergyperson, but this fact is not determinative. A letter from a clergyperson is not the only way to demonstrate that one holds a religious belief. To the extent that Mercy Catholic may have believed that it could not be discriminating on the basis of religion if it fired an employee who could not produce a letter from a clergyperson, it was mistaken. However, because Fallon's beliefs are not religious, terminating him for acting on his beliefs did not constitute religious discrimination.
5 Page 5 of 5 B. The Essay Fallon also argues that the District Court erred in considering the essay that Mercy Catholic submitted with its reply brief, supporting its motion to dismiss. Fallon had submitted this essay to Mercy Catholic with his request for an accommodation and quoted portions of it in his complaint. Fallon argues that the essay was outside the pleadings and therefore inappropriate to consider in relation to a motion to dismiss. Ordinarily, a court may not consider documents outside the pleadings when deciding a motion to dismiss. If a court wishes to consider documents outside the pleadings, it must convert a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment. 28 However, a court may consider a document that is integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint. 29 For example, in Burlington Coat Factory, when a plaintiff alleged in a complaint that defendants failed to disclose certain facts in publicly issued reports, a court properly considered the full texts of the reports when the reports were attached to a motion to dismiss In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig., 114 F.3d 1410, 1426 (3d Cir. 1997). 29 Id. (internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted). 30 Id. at Fallon, in his complaint, quoted portions of this essay and described the essay as explaining his sincerely held moral and ethical convictions. 31 Thus, Fallon explicitly relied on it, and it was permissible for the District Court to consider it. Fallon suggests that, because the essay was attached to a reply brief, not the initial motion to dismiss, he was given no opportunity to respond to the letter and explain its relevance. However, the District Court held a two-hour hearing after the briefs were submitted. Anything that Fallon needed to explain regarding the letter could have been explained then. Before us, counsel complained that the District Court repeatedly cut him off at the hearing, but the transcript shows that the District Court cut him off only when he attempted to introduce extrinsic evidence not relied upon in the complaint. Thus, we discern no error in the District Court's approach to the essay or to Fallon's attempts to introduce other extrinsic evidence. 31 App. 25. C. Leave to Amend Fallon also argues that dismissing with prejudice was error because he should have been granted leave to amend. We review the District Court's denial of leave to amend for futility under an abuse of discretion standard. 32 Committing a legal error constitutes an abuse of discretion, and futility is a legal question. 33 Amendment would be futile if the complaint, as amended, would nonetheless be subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., 594 F.3d 238, 243 (3d Cir. 2010). 33 See id. (observing that futility is determined under the same standards as a court would apply under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)). 34 See id. Fallon has not proposed any amendments that would cure the fundamental deficiency in his claims that his antivaccination beliefs are not religious in nature. In light of our analysis above, it does not appear that he could do so. Hence, we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant leave to amend. III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court. - End of Case - Contact us at or call ISSN Copyright 2017, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. Reproduction or redistribution, in whole or in part, and in any form, without express written permission, is prohibited except as permitted by the BNA Copyright Policy.
WHEN AND HOW MUST AN EMPLOYEE S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BE ACCOMMODATED? HEALTH DIRECTORS LEGAL CONFERENCE JUNE 8, 2017 Diane M. Juffras School of Government THE LAW Federal First Amendment to U.S. Constitution
MEMORANDUM These issue summaries provide an overview of the law as of the date they were written and are for educational purposes only. These summaries may become outdated and may not represent the current
Hillcrest Christian School dba HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 17531 Rinaldi Street Granada Hills, CA 91344 818-368-7071 COACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Your interest in Heritage Christian School is appreciated.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 11, 2009 Session TWO RIVERS BAPTIST CHURCH, ET AL. v. JERRY SUTTON, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 07-2088-I Claudia
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 1, 2006 98719 ERNEST L. et al., Individually and as Parents and Guardians of NATASHA L., an Infant,
Hillcrest Christian School dba HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 17531 Rinaldi Street Granada Hills, CA 91344 818-368-7071 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Your interest in Heritage Christian School
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No. 2008-02 Adopted February 27, 2008 WHEREAS, the Township of Manalapan
Case 2:03-cv-01580-GLL Document 295 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ex rel. AUGUST
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT THIRD CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST, OF NEW YORK CITY, Plaintiff-Appellee, - v. - THE CITY OF NEW YORK and PATRICIA J. LANCASTER, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New
No. 14-354 In The Supreme Court of the United States BRONX HOUSEHOLD OF FAITH, ET AL., v. Petitioners, THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
Judgment rendered June 26, 2013 Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La.-CCP. No. 48,126-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA JOHNNY LLOYD SMITH,
PRESS DEFINITION AND THE RELIGION ANALOGY RonNell Andersen Jones In her Article, Press Exceptionalism, 1 Professor Sonja R. West urges the Court to differentiate a specially protected sub-category of the
NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS AND THE NEED FOR GREATER CLARITY OF RELIGION UNDER TITLE VII Kevin Farrell * I. INTRODUCTION The history of religious acceptance in the United States has been complicated from the
DePaul Law Review Volume 42 Issue 1 Fall 1992: Symposium - Confronting the Wall of Separation: A New Dialogue Between Law and Religion on the Meaning of the First Amendment Article 7 Individual Conscience
SUPREME COURT DAVID VICKERS as PRESIDENT OF UPSTATE CITIZENS FOR EQUALITY, INC.; DOUG READY Petitioners, COUNTY OF ONEIDA STATE OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PETITION Pursuant to Article 78 of NY CPLR -vs- Index
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 18, 2013 Session KENNER D. ENSEY v. KARLA DAVIS, COMMISSIONER OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ET AL. Appeal from
From: HUGHES Subject: RE: KSLA inquiry Date: February 24, 2014 at 11:52 AM To: MAINIERO, VICTOR /O=CADDOSCHOOLS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP /CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VMAINIERO Cc: DAIGLE, BRUCE /O=CADDOSCHOOLS/OU=EXCHANGE
TAYLOR, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006 ANDRE LEON LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D05-1958 [ June 21, 2006 ] Andre Lewis appeals
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION JENNY S TAVERN, INC., Appellant v. No. 09-1453 PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Appellee Donald G.
Overview and Analysis of the Pending American Humanist Association vs. Greenville County School District Case and Current State of the Law on Student- Initiated Religious Speech and School Use of Religious
AMISH EDUCATION 271 FAITH BEFORE THE COURT: THE AMISH AND EDUCATION Jacob Koniak The free practice of religion is a concept on which the United States was founded. Freedom of religion became part of the
Case: 13-1668 Document: 122 Page: 1 11/22/2013 1100000 18 13-1668-CV IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT American Atheists, Inc., Dennis Horvitz, Kenneth Bronstein, Jane Everhart
Religious Freedom: Our First Freedom Adult Formation Class June 22, 2014 Legal Do s and Don ts Churches and other 501(c)(3) organizations have legal limits as to what they can and cannot do regarding elections.
Background Packet Name: I have done my observations and I am applying for: Church office Monday-Friday 9a-5p -Administrative Office address: 14418 K Miller Ave. Fontana, CA 92336 The following questions
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS C8-00-1613 Rodney LeVake, Appellant, vs. Independent School District #656; Keith Dixon, Superintendent; Dave Johnson, Principal; and Cheryl Freund, Curriculum Director,
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued October 3, 2017 Decided November
Religion and Discrimination in Employment (Part 1) 10/29/15, 10:14 PM Published on Standard Bearer (http://standardbearer.rfpa.org) Home > Religion and Discrimination in Employment (Part 1) Religion and
Case 16-1271, Document 30, 08/08/2016, 1835800, Page1 of 90 16-1271cv IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT JOANNE FRATELLO, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF
LEADING CASES I. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW A. First Amendment 1. Freedom of Religion Ministerial Exception. For forty years, lower federal courts have held that employment discrimination laws are subject to a
In defence of the four freedoms : freedom of religion, conscience, association and speech Understanding religious freedom Religious freedom is a fundamental human right the expression of which is bound
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 Constitution of Desiring God Community Church Adopted by the Congregation, July, 00; amended July 1, 00 and August, 01 Preamble Since it pleased God to call together a community
Christ Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church 317 East Hamilton Avenue Flint, Michigan 48505 (810) 238-9605 (Office) (810) 238-8109 (Fax) A FULL TIME PASTOR OPENING Christ Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church
NOS. 14-1418, -1453, -1505, 15-35, -105, -119, & -191 In the Supreme Court of the United States DAVID A. ZUBIK, et al., v. Petitioners, SYLVIA BURWELL, et al., Respondents. On Writs of Certiorari to the
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2010 Opinion filed December 29, 2010. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D10-1509 Lower Tribunal No.
The United States Supreme Court Sanctifies the Ministerial Exception in Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC Without Addressing Who is a Minister: A Blessing for Religious Freedom or is the Line Between Church and State
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-349 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHARLES GREGORY ANDRUS, AKA ROBERT CHARLES ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES GEORGE ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES
The Coalition Against Religious Discrimination November 24, 2017 Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships Office of Intergovernmental and External Affairs U.S. Department of Health and Human
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 CONSTITUTION of the CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH WASHINGTON, D.C. Adopted by the membership on May 1, 1 Revised by the membership on May 1, 00, September 1, 00, November 1, 00,
VII. Legislation RS 207 SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY (Adopted 06-09-2012) WHEREAS An ad hoc group of clergy consisting of Kathy Barnhart, Keith Dunn, Gretchen Hulse, Cindy Schneider, Paul Taylor and Bob Zilhaver
Powell v. Portland School District Chronology October 15, 1996 During school hours, a Boy Scout troop leader is allowed to speak to Harvey Scott Elementary school students, encouraging them to join the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8
JULEA WARD, v. No. 10-2100/10-2145 In the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, ROY WILBANKS, ET. AL., Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Appeal from
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: Rebecca Reyes Petitioner No. 10 MC1-600050 and Joseph Reyes Respondent MOTION TO DISMISS
Black Jack Original Free Will Baptist Church 2972 Black Jack - Simpson Road Greenville, N.C. 27858 CONSTITUTION, BY - LAWS AND CHURCH COVENANT Revised: March 19, 2013 ARTICLE I. NAME AND PURPOSE SECTION
1-800-835-5233 MEMORANDUM RE: First Amendment rights of students to promote and participate in Bring Your Bible to School Day On October 5, 2017, students around the United States will participate in Bring
The purpose of Child Evangelism Fellowship is to evangelize boys and girls with the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and to establish (disciple) them in the Word of God and in a local church for Christian
DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO DATE FILED: January 30, 2018 1:08 PM FILING ID: C1C7726B613F4 CASE NUMBER: 2018CV30344 Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone:
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ELMBROOK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JOHN DOE 3, A MINOR BY DOE 3 S NEXT BEST FRIEND DOE 2, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Harrisonburg Division Plaintiff, Civil No. :cv000 vs. JONATHAN R. ALGER, et al., Harrisonburg, Virginia APPEARANCES: For the Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ERNEST GIBSON, Minor, by his Guardian ad litem, SUSAN M. GRAMLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, Appeal No. 10-3814 v. AMERICAN CYANAMID, CO., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Standard Policies CEC-NA Version 2016 2.0 Office of the Primate INTERNATIONAL COMMUNION OF THE CHARISMATIC EPISCOPAL CHURCH (North America) Dtd 29 Sept 2016 CEC-NA 50 Saint Thomas Pl Malverne, NY 11565-1635
Fact vs. Fiction Setting the Record Straight on the BSA Adult Leadership Standards Overview: Recently, several questions have been raised about the BSA s new leadership standards and the effect the standards
Nos. 14-1418, 14-1453, 14-1505, 15-35, 15-105, 15-119 & 15-191 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States ---------------------------------
Committee on Ministry Presbytery of Baltimore Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) MINISTERIAL ETHICS GUIDELINES adopted at the 752nd Stated Meeting of the Presbytery of Baltimore January 27, 1994 These guidelines
Stephen G. Montoya (#01) MONTOYA JIMENEZ, P.A. The Great American Tower 0 North Central Avenue, Ste. 0 Phoenix, Arizona 0 (0) - (fax) - email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
Date: The EPC Ministerial Vocation Committee and Office of the Stated Clerk provide resources and advice to both pastors and congregational search committees. To that end, we ask congregations and ministers
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 580 Filed: 08/07/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:22687 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Philip Charvat, on behalf of himself
COLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ColeValleyChristian.org Human Resources Department Kassie Jones, HR Director 200 E. Carlton Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 (208) 947-1212 or fax (208) 898-9290 Email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
43065 Joy Rd. Canton, MI 48187 734-459-3505 Athletic Fax: 734-414-3459 COACHING APPLICATION Position applied for: Date: PLYMOUTH CHRISTIAN ACADEMY considers all applicants for employment without regard
Secular Coalition for America Mission and Purpose Our mission is to increase the visibility and respect for nontheistic viewpoints in the United States, and to protect and strengthen the secular character
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : JUSTIN JAMES ROZNOWSKI, : : Appellant : No. 1857 WDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DONALD DALE SMITH, JR., Appellant, CASE NO.: 2015-AP-00006-A-O Lower Court Case: 2014-MM-012298-A-O v. STATE OF FLORIDA,
Nos. 15-105, 14-1418, 14-1453, 14-1505, 15-35, 15-119, 15-191 In the Supreme Court of the United States LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED, DENVER, COLO., ET AL., Petitioners, v. SYLVIA BURWELL,
No. 15-105 In the Supreme Court of the United States LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED, DENVER, COLO., ET AL., Petitioners, v. SYLVIA BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.,
Included in this WORKSHEET are the questions and prompts that authorized ministers and Members in Discernment will find in the new Ministerial Profiles Portal. Information entered in My Settings controls
ESSAI Volume 1 Article 16 Spring 2003 The Pledge of Allegiance: "Under God" - Unconstitutional? Susanne K. Frens College of DuPage Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai Recommended
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Noah s Ark Christian Child Care Center, Inc. and Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, Trustee v. No. 2483 C.D. 2002 Zoning Hearing Board of West Mifflin v. Borough
Vine Memorial Baptist Church Pastoral Job Description Principle Function The pastor is the spiritual leader of the Vine Memorial Baptist Church who is accountable to God, the Board of Deacons and the congregation.
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 43 Issue 1 Article 13 1-1-1986 Education For Economic Security Act: The Secular Humanism Ban And Equal Access Act Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr
MOUNT CARMEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH 610 S.E. LIME STREET TOPEKA, KS 66607 (785) 234-4422 PASTORAL VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT AND APPLICATION Salary Range: $45,000 - $50,000 Annually The Mount Carmel Missionary
PRIVATE RULING 8833001; 1988 PRL LEXIS 1594 PRIVATE RULING 8833001 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM "This document may not be used or cited as precedent. Section 6110(j)(3)
A New Approach to NLRB Jurisdiction over the Employment Practices of Religious Institutions The constitutional limits on National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") jurisdiction over the employment practices
TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Bishop Page 4 I. Theological Content Page 5 II. Diocesan Policy and Procedures Concerning Allegations and Incidents of Sexual Misconduct Page 7 i. Policy ii. Definitions
THE FAITH COMMUNITY AND MISSION OF THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE AND ITS ECCLESIASTICAL ENTITIES I. Key Characteristics of the C&MA s Faith Community and Mission. Big Sandy Camp & Retreat Center
Case: 17-17522, 02/27/2018, ID: 10778222, DktEntry: 11, Page 1 of 32 RECORD NO. 17-17522 In The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit BENJAMIN W. ESPINOSA; AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION,
June 12, 2012 Superintendent Isabel DiMola CEC District 21 Re: Removal of God Bless the USA From P.S. 90 Graduation Ceremony Dear Superintendent DiMola: The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has
IRS Private Letter Ruling (Deacons) Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Index No: 0107.00-00 Refer Reply to: CC:EBEO:2 PLR 115424-97 Date: Dec. 10, 1998 Key: Church
Frequently Asked Questions ECO s Polity (Organization & Governance) What is the state of ECO today? What has changed since 2013? ECO now has almost 300 churches compared with fewer than 100 in 2013 and
To discuss how religion and non-religion means many things to different people To distinguish between the top 5 religions in the U.S. To ascertain the best practices for reducing and/or eliminating workplace
Missionary Application Form Survey How did you hear about LCMI? (Check all that apply) Website LCMI Missionary Name(s) LCMI Literature Church Name School Name Other How did you receive this application?
SECOND DIVISION DOYLE, C. J., MILLER, P. J., and REESE, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely
BRILLINGER v. BROCKIE Ontario Human Rights Commission and Ray Brillinger and the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives, (Complainants) and Scott Brockie and Imaging Excellence Inc., (Respondents). Background:
RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR OPERATION OF THE COLUMBARIUM of Highland Park United Methodist Church Dallas, Texas DEFINITIONS A-1. A-2. A-3. A-4. A-5. A-6. A-7. the A-8. A-9. Church The term Church as used
Pastoral Code of Conduct ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON Office of the Moderator of the Curia P.O. Box 29260 Washington, DC 20017 email@example.com Table of Contents Section I: Preamble... 1 Section II: