An Investigation and Analysis of Religious Experience Argument Put Forward by Friedrich Schleiermacher

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "An Investigation and Analysis of Religious Experience Argument Put Forward by Friedrich Schleiermacher"

Transcription

1 International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 2013 Available online at ISSN X / Vol, 4 (2): Science Explorer Publications An Investigation and Analysis of Religious Experience Argument Put Forward by Friedrich Schleiermacher Valiollah Khoshtinat 1, Akram Askarzadeh Mazraee, Mohammad Ghaffari 3 1. Assistant Professor and faculty member, Department of Theology and Islamic Sciences, Payame Noor University (PNU), I.R, Iran 2. Religion Philosophy PHD Student, Payame Noor University, Mohaghegh Ardabili University 3. Faculty member, Department of Theology and Islamic Sciences, Payame Noor University (PNU), I.R, Iran. Corresponding author: Valiollah Khoshtinat ABSTRACT: Religious experience argument introduced by Friedrich Schleiermacher results from the dominant law on the relationship between god and humans in Christianity. Religious experience argument is formed in accordance with Christianity s definition of god s relationship with humans. As Schleiermacher believes, because this argument is based on religious experience rooted in sensation, it is fault-free (infallible). Yet, as ontological argument, this argument has reached rational affirmation of god s existence from god s concept. Religious experience results into knowledge, a knowledge in forming of which, non-epistemological factors such as pragmatic, psychological and sociological factors are influential and that becomes substantiated by rational justifications in foundationalism tradition. Understanding the causality and creativity relationships is abstract and rational. Against what is claimed, basics and fundamentals of religious experience argument are not fault-free and like all rational and empirical beliefs are subject to fault. Although the scope of religious belief formation in religious experience is outside intellect and action, it doesn t go higher or beyond interference by intellect and action. Keywords: religious belief experience, Schleiermacher, ontological experience, knowledge, intellect, sensation INTRODUCTION Scholastic and deist thinkers of 17 th and 18 th centuries had presented ontological, teleological and cosmological arguments to justify religious beliefs based on rational and empirical proofs. These arguments were undermined by Kant and Hume. Friedrich Schleiermacher, influenced by Kant, believed in the limitations of intellect. Hence, he puts forward the religious belief argument to justify religious beliefs on the basis of humans experience. He tries to stretch the realm of religion beyond intellect and take it away from the realm of theory and action. He sets the element of religious experience in religion as the basis of his deduction. The basis of religion is set on a moment of experience that is religious by nature. In his perspective, religion does not mean religious beliefs and a series of religious rituals or actions (Proudfoot 2004). It is of the same type of sensation. It is a mere dependence or self-conscience of the existence absolutely dependent on a power or origin distinct from the world. This is an intuitive experience, independent of concepts, imaginations, and beliefs or actions. This is also a kind of sensation that goes beyond conceptual distinctions (Abasi, 2007) and (Peterson, Husker et al, p.41). Schleiermacher considers the experience resulted from intuition as inexpressible (Ghanbari 2007). Nature of religion, religious experience and religiousness, enjoying religious experience or sense-perception are infinite things and the sense of absolute dependence on the infinite thing. This is not a sense of excitement or zeal but a kind of immediate religious self-conscience (Kung 2000). Religion is neither an acquired nor a teachable thing; yet, it is an inborn talent or genius for humans (Ghanbari 2007).This is a common sense reachable for all humans (Abasi, 2007).

2 To delineate the nature of religion and religiousness in Schleiermacher s perspective, we first discuss the epistemology of religious experience and determine whether it has a basis different from rational arguments or not, then consider the intuitive, innate and acquired nature of religious experience. Epistemological fundamentals of religious experience argument The main emphasis of this section is on investigating epistemological fundamentals of religious experience argument based on Friedrich Schleiermacher s opinions. Theories regarding belief justification are divided into two categories of subjectivism and objectivism. Historically, as of Plato s time up to now, most of epistemologists have been introversive. Based on these theories, there should be a reason for every belief that justifies that belief or paves the way for it. Belief justification might happen based on sense-perception, memory report, sensations, witnesses or a deduction of all beliefs and this happens while we are conscious of all reasons and backgrounds of our belief and have voluntary control over acquiring our beliefs (Puyman 2008). Foundationalism and coherentism are the two main groups of introversion viewpoint. Based on traditional foundationalists viewpoint, epistemic justification is a longitudinal and hierarchical system in which some beliefs or propositions are base and self-justifying and other beliefs or propositions in case be deducted from base beliefs and propositions are justified. Base propositions are immediately considered as knowledge and deducted propositions are so through mediums. In this viewpoint, we can be favored with non-deducted knowledge on which other types of our knowledge are based (Puyman 2008). As some of foundatioalists hold, if there are not enough epistemic reasons for justifying a belief, non-epistemic reasons such as prudential and indeterminist reasons can justify true beliefs in god (Abasian 2007) Many of the approaches justifying religious beliefs have tried to justify these beliefs on the basis of epistemic reasons and considering religious beliefs as the foundation. Ontological, teleological and cosmological arguments that use rational and epistemic witnesses to justify beliefs are from among this category. We will discuss religious experience in the next parts. Objectivists pay attention to the role of non-epistemological factors in forming the true belief. They believed, as far as a belief is confirmed through a reliable process, it is considered justified (Puyman 2008). From among the main objectivist approaches, one can name virtue-centered reliabilism and textualism. Based on the most famous narration of reliabilism, beliefs are true and justifiable when produced by a reliable process. A reliable process consists of a series of factors that are mainly outside the individual s conscience and access and typically produces true beliefs(abasian 2007). There is no need for the individual to argue for his belief; just as the beliefs are formed through a reliable process, the individual has knowledge of what he truly recalls (Puyman 2008). If the individual s belief is formed by a suitable cause, he has justification for it, whether he attains that cause or not (Puyman 2008). Virtue-centered reliabilism emphasizes those attributes that most probably provide more truth (Puyman 2008). Virtue epistemology includes those theories in epistemology that analyze fundamental epistemic concepts such as justification and knowledge based on individuals personality, not beliefs and emphasize individuals characteristics, power or physical processes. Attention is paid to the belief owner rather than belief itself. According to textualism theory, knowledge depends on text or background, conditions and status of affairs and the acquired knowledge changes upon the changes of text and state of affairs (Abasian, 2007). Schleiermacher describes religious experience as sensing or knowing something and considers content for it that is describable just in propositional words (Puyman, 2008). The feeling of absolute dependence or selfconscience is regarded as an absolutely dependent creature (Abasi) and (Mahdavi Nejad, 2003).This is not a rational experience but an intuitive one whose reliability is self-standing (Peterson, Husker et al., 2000). And this feeling that is the deeper origin of religion necessitates that, philosophical and theological meditations be secondary results and consequences of experience. If there is no religious experience, divine sciences or religious philosophies won t be introduced (Peterson, Husker et al 2000). The nature of religion is not thought nor action, but it is intuition and sense. In other words, religious experience is the principle element of religion that is not rooted in thought; yet, it deals with sensation and taste (Ghanbari, 2007). Religious experience is a kind of awareness of the absolute dependence; hence, it can be said that is has an epistemic constituent. A kind of awareness not originated by intellect; yet, it is sensation, intuition or internal encountering with the infinite thing (Ghanbari, 2007). It is awareness when it possesses epistemic value (Proudfoot, 2004). Religiousness occurs when we genuinely perceive god in our feelings. Then religious selfconsciousness includes an epistemic constituent (Proudfoot, 2004). It is an immediate thing and beyond whatever fault or misinterpretation (Proudfoot, 2004). Therefore, Schleiermacher, more than anybody else, confesses to believing in the basicness of religious experience for religious belief and proving god s existence (Abasi, 2007). Regardless of correctness of Schleiermacher s claim as

3 regards his definition, religious experience has two attributes of immediate religious consciousness, independent of thought and including an intuitive element. One can say, he believes in basic, faultless and evident nature of religious experience. He also regards other rational religious beliefs such as philosophy and theology as secondary and results of religious experience being based on this experience. Like traditional foundationalists, he considers some of religious beliefs basic, evident and faultless needing no proof or argument from which other religious beliefs are deducted. If we consider his words with no analysis, he believes in traditional foundationalism with the difference that primary and evident principles don t result from theoretical and rational intuition; yet, they are sensational intuitions and of the class of emotions proving other beliefs. They also make them happen. Religious rational propositions and beliefs are descriptors of religious experiences. Religious experiences are independent of beliefs, yet they are expressed in the framework of beliefs and actions (Proudfoot, 2004). Secondary beliefs are founded on the basis of a kind of direct knowledge (Proudfoot, 2004). Those humans who have possessed religious sensations and intuitions, express those sensations and beliefs for those not having found those intuitions immediately because they want to share their intuitions. Yet as these concepts are related to the innermost constituent of humanity, they are not realized through conversation. The transfer of religious beliefs must occur in a more excellent manner and those possessing these intuitions should only talk to those who are more elevated(ghanbari, 2007) We deduce from the words of Schleiermacher saying, not anybody acquires these religious intuitions; they are related to those humans who are at the highest stages of humanity. As he believes, humanity is an especial kind of behavior being established among humans and religion becomes manifest in this kind of humanity relationship (Ghanbari, 2007). The acquiring of intuitions occurs through a process he construes as humanity, an individual must possess humanity or the highest status of humans, if he wants to reach religious intuitions. Religious experience that is a fault-free intuition and the knowledge resulted from it is evident and basic should be acquired though a reliable process. It is in the reliable process that basic and genuine intuitions are resulted from the infinite thing as well as the internal encountering with that; and also the religious beliefs resulted from those intuitions are expressed in the form of descriptive propositions. Especial outlook of Schleiermacher regarding humanity and intuition of the infinite thing as well as fault-free knowledge can be deemed conforming to Vosugh Geraee theory. In Vosugh Geraaee outlook, knowledge and belief are true as they are resulted from a reliable process. It doesn t need justification and the reliability of knowledge process justifies its truth. As Schleiermacher holds, religious experience is a direct confrontation occurred in humanity process, between human being and the infinite thing. The resulted knowledge and religious belief are deemed faultless; therefore, for the knower who has been in direct confrontation with that reality, it can be assured. Stephan Catus believes that religious experience happens to an individual who might be under the supervision of guiders and masters in an especial gnostic tradition and acquire the genuine gnostic insight through the methods and creeds the master inspires. As the guider believes, moving the path to acquiring gnostic experience is the same reliable process of acquiring a true belief with no need of the rational justification intended by Vosugh Gerayan. And as regards the definition of humanity presented by Schleiermacher, we can deduce that through this path to acquiring gnostic experience, the theosophist attains to the humanity intended by Schleiermacher and this is the same as acquiring sensual virtues that is intended by epistemologists in virtue-centered reliabilism. Virtue-centered reliabilism considers justified a belief that can be reliable and justifiable, not through rational reasons but for nonepistemological reasons beyond the content of belief. Schleiermacher doesn t consider religious experience reliable and faultless through rational explication and putting forward argument; yet, he considers religious experience as reliable and true, as a result of internal, immediate and direct confrontation with the infinite thing, attained by an individual enjoying humanity. The method of justifying rational religious philosophical and theological beliefs deduced from basic and evident religious experiences is close to the method of epistemological justification of traditional epistemologists and religious experience resulted form humanity process close to the epistemological justification theory of subjectivists is similar to the perspectives of virtue-centered reliabilists. On the other hand, he confesses to the effectiveness of these intuitions and says religion is in a way that belongs to a really humane life and it should always be active and effective (Ghanbari, 2007). This effectiveness can be understood in his words as to humans creation narration as he believes humanity is a special behavior established among all people and this humane relationship is the subject of religion and religion intends to see the infinite thing, its manifestation and signs in humanity (Ghanbari, 2007). Therefore, humanity that is rooted in behavior will be the effects of mystical intuition on humans behavior and action in the humane relationship. As we already mentioned, intuition and perception of the infinite thing happens for an individual who is in the highest stages of humanity and also expressions of the owners of intuition and religious experience will be understood by those who have attained to the highest humane stages. It is also said that religiousness means intuition of the world and the value of religion depends on the intuition method (Ghanbari, 2007). As we know, most of spiritual wayfaring of theosophists that is under supervision of masters and guiders is practical and rooted in

4 action. Hence, one can result that truth and reliability of religious experience is based on pragmatic basics of truth and its effects are rooted in action. Therefore, Schleiermacher religious experience, as William James, includes pragmatic truth. In the 6 th oration, Schleiermacher talks of multiplicity of religions. The intuition rooted in religion has different forms for humans and considers the essence of religion a multipliable fact that should enjoy a kind of individuation. Different religions are finite forms of religion essence. In this regard, Hans Kung says, as Schleiermacher holds, an infinite fact is not per se understandable in the abstract form; yet, it is always understandable in the finite fact and manifests in various forms (Ghanbari, 2007) Religion has an appearance and an inner part. Positive religions are apparent and finite forms of the infinite religion (Kung, 2000). Steven Ketz claims that all religious experiences are mediated and are strongly determinate by social environment of religion and theosophist enters all concepts, forms, symbols and values into his experience (Ketz, 2004). Religious experiences as to the divine creature are notably different, i.e. Jesus, Krishina, Brahman and theosophists have varied and plural intuitive perceptions of religion essence. The speaker s duty is describing and regulating religious emotions in a special society. Reliability of each theological claim must be searched in the emotions of religious society (Proudfoot, 2004). And these theological claims are based on religious experiences and emotions as well as internal confrontation with the infinite thing. Religious descriptions are religious thoughts, and expressers of these reports and descriptions are familiar with religious emotions (Proudfoot, 2004).Religious teaching is the manifestation of emotional element that is formed with traditions (Abasi, 2007). Schleiermacher believes religious experiences are perceived in a multiple form. Religion essence that is the infinite fact turns into intuitive perception by individuals in infinite religious forms. Therefore, religious experiences are basically multiple. The background, text and social conditions in which the theosophist lives is the finite framework in which the infinite fact is intuited and perceived by the theosophist. The value of intuition also differs upon the variety of intuitive methods through which the theosophist intuits the infinite fact. The value of religion also depends on the value of intuition (Ghanbari, 2007).The intuition based on religion has different forms for different individuals. Multiplicity and variety of the external church is also a necessary fact. As Schleiermacher holds, the existing religions are symbols and manifestations of real religion and as a human is a finite thing, he intuits religion that is an infinite thing finitely; therefore, nobody can claim to have a perfect religion (Ghanbari, 2007). Schleiermacher s consideration of the effects of religious traditions, intuition, collection of intuitions in a way that multiple intuitions create multiple and finite religions and assessment of the reliability of the intuitions in a special society in which intuitions are formed, admits to the effects and conditions of the creation of conscience in the knower. His viewpoint looks like that of the textualists that upon the changes of text and conditions, the knowledge attained starts changing. This indicates Schleiermacher s consideration of the effects of external and sociological elements on belief. So far, we dealt with the analysis of epistemological basics of religious experience as held by Schleiermacher, regardless of investigating the correctness of his viewpoints. Analysis of religious experience argument to ontological argument To prevent conflict between religion and knowledge and review religion by rational basics, Schleiermacher introduces religious experience argument to prove god s existence and justify religious beliefs. Those arguments that had justified belief in god s existence through rational and empirical proofs had been criticized by some thinkers such as Kant and Hume; then, truth and justification of religious beliefs had been questioned. Schleiermacher tried to prove the belief in god s existence through an argument so as not to be judged and invalidated by other types of knowledge. He believes that the nature of religion is not thought and action, yet it is intuition and sensation. Basic element of religion is religious experience that deals with feeling and intuition. It is the feeling of absolute and integrated dependence on a distinct origin or power in the world. This intuitive experience is independent of concepts, imaginations and actions and its reliability is selfcontained, because it is the immediate perception of infinite fact and the feeling of dependence on it. This is a sensational and emotional experience, not epistemic. The feeling of infinity or absolute dependence for the empiricist is the result of inference, not presupposing beliefs. Reports empiricist presents about religious experience are descriptive, not theoretical. Religious experience becomes immediately realized and is just perceivable through direct conscience. Hence, descriptive reports cannot be expressive of the reality of religious experience. Religious experience is independent and reports of the religious moment depend on concepts, beliefs and actions. Although religious experience is expressed in the form of beliefs and actions, it is not created by words and concepts. Descriptive propositions don t establish religious experience (Proudfoot, 2004). To acquire this experience, every person should individually experience and intuit this perception. As Rudolf Otto believes, this

5 specified physical status is understandable only through creating experience in the knower (Otto 1957, p.7). Everybody who intends to describe religious experience should use emotional language. Following Schleiermacher, Otto says emotional language is admonitory. Recent researches of psychologists and philosophers of mind have proven that feelings and emotions depend on a series of beliefs and language grammar rules and as Schleiermacher and Oto say, internal emotions and feelings are not simple but depend on the presence of concepts and imaginations. Kant believes that we don t have direct perception of the object of our experiences and perceive empirical realities through forms of sensation and mental categories. Memory plays an important role in our perception and knowledge of external realities. Schleiermacher tries to introduce a realm in human s being in which a human is in direct touch with the external fact and mental categories don t interfere with perception. In recent centuries, objectivist epistemologists have proven that humans sciences are under the effects of psychological, sociological and pragmatic factors and these non-epistemological factors are influential in the formation of beliefs. Humans cannot free themselves from these causal conditions. Schleiermacher s view regarding multiplicity of intuition forms approves this opinion. He believes humans are infinite creatures who experience the infinite fact in symbols and manifestations of different religions, none of whom being favored with a perfect real religion for their finiteness. Religious experience is the independent and immediate conscience including an intuitive element that is the object of that infinite being (Proudfoot, 2004). Otto criticizes Schleiermacher arguing he has not perceived the important element of religious experience because the feeling of being a creature and dependence on another fact can be understood deductively (Mahdavi Nejad, 2003, p.289). Schleiermacher s perspective indicating that religious experience means the feeling of absolute dependence on the infinite fact depends on the proposition that the empiricist be conscious of his distinction from the infinite fact and this dependency feeling that is the very understanding of being creature or creator between the infinite fact and oneself is emanated from the causal relationship and deduction is done by intellect. In religious experience, intellect is actively present and the result shall be rational deduction. According to Schleiermacher s perspective, experience takes precedence over concepts and beliefs, yet it describes the religious moment using the concept of god, infinite and unlimited fact. He defines religious experience through referring to these concepts and he also regards experience as god s deed. He also asserts that the belief in the existence of experience cause and also the using of the concept of god are included in the definition of experience (Proudfoot, 2004). It means the empiricist possesses a special belief through which, he defines experience. In explicating experience, the individual s beliefs and faith interfere and from the viewpoint of beliefs, the infinite fact becomes experienced and also multiple and varied experiences are reported. Sensations and emotions possess object and the relationship between sensation and its object is logical and conceptual (Proudfoot, 2004). Aristotle believes that concepts and judgments make sensations and sensations cannot be explained in conflict with ration and will. Psychologists and philosophers such as objectivist epistemologists have recently criticized those theories considering sensations independent of epistemic prepositions. Aristotle believes, the defining of psychological moods depends on referring to their object, as Schleiermacher defines both sensation and intuition with regard to their objects and considers their relationship as absolute dependence. Aristotle also believes there should be a causal presupposition and a special belief as regards the relationship between sensation and its object so as to be able to talk about sensations, emotions and their causes. As a result, there is an element of knowledge, concept and beliefs in sensations. Religious experience is considered as religious from the perspective of its agent (Proudfoot, 2004). Then religious experiences are perceived by the knower of those religious experiences and another individual might not perceive them as religious. Then it becomes clear that describing the object as religious depends on the feeling and perception of the knower, not the occurrence or event. In order of differentiating religious sensations and emotions from other emotions such as sadness, happiness etc., Schleiermacher says, religious sensation is distinct from other sensations because its content is about absolute dependence and reliance (Proudfoot, 2004). On the other side, differentiating religious sensation from other emotions depends on its epistemic element i.e. the content and object of the sensation. We already mentioned that understanding the relationship between the object of sensation and sensation has a conceptual and logical nature and the agent of experience regards that object the cause of his sensation with regard to the presuppositions and beliefs he has is his mind regarding that object. On the other side, the individual differentiates between religious sensations and emotions from some emotions such as sadness and happiness and defines them distinctly. In differentiating the two sensations, there should be a general notion of the nature of the two sensations so as to be able to differentiate between them even if they are of the same type. General notions are rational and

6 subjective concepts. Differentiation is the duty of intellect. Stephen Kates believes that no experience is achieved without the mediation of concepts and beliefs. Even the knowledge of the self that is an intuitive experience is resulted from deduction(peterson Husker et al., 2000). Based on the issues discussed, we can result that religious experiences as Schleiermacher believes is not void of intellect and thought; yet, sensations possess a conceptual element and empiricist beliefs, notions and presuppositions influence what experience does. On the other hand, Schleiermacher configured the religious experience argument so as to be able to move it off the realm of intellect and interference of beliefs, notions and concepts so as not to be criticized by science; yet, with regard to what said, we understand that it doesn t have that attribute and this argument like the ontological argument starts with the concept of god and proves god s existence in the exterior because as we said before, understanding the dependence relationship between self and the infinite thing depends on some beliefs and notions regarding god. In reality, prior to experience, we have knowledge of god and we are also conscious of our distinction with him. Yet we consider this relationship a causal one and experience religious sensation in the framework of the beliefs and notions of ourselves. Hence, religious experience argument like ontological argument is based on the subjective notion of god. As Schleiermacher says, descriptive reports of these experiences such as philosophy and theology are rational being created by religious experiences. So, in expressing these experiences which are the very descriptive reports, we use rational explication. Like ontological argument, it uses rational explication to prove god s existence in the exterior from the concept of god s notion. Also understanding the relationship between creator and creature and the causal relationship is a rational inference. Investigation and review of religious experience Schleiermacher describes religious experience as an immediate and faultless fact and beyond any misinterpretation. He emphasizes a kind of intuition that is immune from whatever kind of faults and misinterpretation. He asserts, the feeling of absolute dependence on the infinite fact is produced by no mental form nor by any prior knowledge of god. Religious conscience means believing in the fact that the cause of the existence of the god and world is an infinite thing apart from the world. That is a feeling that humans and world are reliant on a power other than the world. The relationship between humans with the infinite fact is absolute and complete (Proudfoot, 2004). Although being perceivable only through familiarity and acquaintanceship, this is a general and global element being assessable to all humans (Abasi, 2007). From the most important methods of knowing humans, one can refer to intuition and revelation. Intuition and revelation mean we acquire the knowledge of realities as they are, without using notions and mental forms. In this case, there would be an intuitive knowledge. Philosophers have regarded the words intuition, revelation and intuitive knowledge synonymous. Theosophists believe that apart from sensations and intellect, there are other ways of acquiring knowledge, namely intuition and revelation. Through intellect, one cannot acquire true knowledge of the facts and objects. Intuition is a state beyond the state of intellect. Intuitive perception like sense-perception is a personal affair and everybody only perceives an experience personally imparted to him. Through spiritual wayfaring and practical mysticism, theosophist can reach a stage to acquire knowledge of realities though intuitive perception (Hussein Zadeh, 2006). Muslim philosophers applied teachings of intuitive science in philosophy under the influence of mysticism. It was, yet, different from mystical intuition. Mystical intuitive experience is produced by asceticism, but not for everybody. Yet intuitive knowledge is general and innate in philosophy and doesn t need self-purification (Hussein Zadeh, 2006). Avicenna believes that a human s knowledge of his ego is intuitive knowledge. Rational soul perceives itself without the mediation of perceptual instrument (Avecinna, 2006) Allameh Tabatabaee believes that the realization of an ontological cause for its effect and the dependence of the knowable being on the knower that is the same as the causality relationship are from among the instances of intuitive knowledge (Hussein Zadeh, 2006). As stated in Shafa, intuitive knowledge will be acquired for the self when the abstract form of an object is present by the side of the perceiver (Avecinna2006, p. 327). Sheikh Shahab Aldine Sohrvardi considers the knowledge of essence of essence, god s knowledge of what other than god, human s knowledge of his perceptual and impulsive faculties, human s knowledge of his mental forms, human s knowledge of animate moods and passions such as perceiving pain as intuitive knowledge (Sohrvardi, 1994). In Sheikh Eshragh s viewpoint, human s knowledge of the objective form or external being of the object is considered as intuitive knowledge. For intuitive knowledge to be realized, in Avicenna s perspective, both perceiver and the perceived must be abstract. In Sheikh Eshragh s perspective, abstractness of the perceived is not a prerequisite but abstractness of the perceiver is a prerequisite for the realization of intuitive knowledge (Hussein Zadeh, 2006). Other criteria presented by philosophers and the sages for intuitive knowledge is intuitive unity and connection. And intuitive knowledge, unity and connection don t happen only through the presence of an object by the side of another object. For intuitive connection and unity between two objects, both Avicenna and Sheikh Eshragh believe

7 that perceiver must be abstract, yet the existence of perceiver must not depend on else or its existence in itself must not be the very being in the place. In this condition, if abstract affairs connect to the knowable and the knowable might be present by their side, intuitive knowledge will form (Hussein Zadeh, 2006). Allameh Tabatabaee regards unity as the source of the presence of the knowable by the side of the knower and from among the types of unity refers to the causal relationship between the knowable and the knower and also the realization of ontological cause for its knowable. Sadrol Motaahelin also regards the knowledge of the effect of its cause as an intuitive knowledge and also considers causal relationship as its source (Hussein zadeh, 2006) To sum up the abovementioned expressions, one can say that intuitive knowledge becomes realized when the knower is abstract, selfexistent and the reality is knowable or it is a being or is one of the stages of being, or the knower is one of the being stages of the reality of the knowable (Hussein Zadeh, 2006). Now if we want to assess Schleiermacher s perspective on the quality of conscience in religious experience, we find out that he regards it of the same nature as human sensations and emotions that is realized through intuition and revelation for humans; besides, it is a personal experience generally reachable for humans. Mystical experiences realized through revelation occur after spiritual wayfaring and practical mysticism. In Schleiermacher s words, such attributes are not mentioned. As believed by Islamic philosophers, mysticism and intuition are devoted to the elites and are not reachable to all, while Schleiermacher believes they are reachable for everybody. He also describes this religious feeling as the feeling of absolute dependence on the infinite fact that is the causal relationship between human and his creator. Islamic philosophers also regarded the knowledge of effect of its cause as one of the types of intuitive knowledge. What Schleiermacher defines regarding religious experience is similar to the philosophers perspective on intuitive knowledge rather than what mystics regard as revelation and intuition. Yet of course, inexpressibility and interpretative nature of propositions of the acquired knowledge that is indicative of mystical experience is similar to the mystics perspective regarding mystical experience and its inexpressibility. Infallibility of the intuitive knowledge intended by the philosophers is questionable as they regard human s knowledge of his self and animate states infallible and as a part of intuitive knowledge, while we see many people make mistakes regarding knowing themselves or they realize the object of their pains, sadness or anger by mistake; hence, humans emotions and sensations as well as human s knowledge of himself is fallible. Also infallibility of mystical intuition and revelation is questionable as for many times what a mystic experiences might not be divinely inspired but it might be inspired by satanic thoughts and the mystic might regard it as mystical experience by mistake. Therefore, it is recommended that spiritual wayfaring happen under the supervision of a guider. Feeling poverty and causal relationship between the creator and the creature and also between the cause and effect and knowledge of animate states such as emotions and sensations are from the instances intended by philosophers. They don t talk of such a revelation or intuition as a mystic experience needing spiritual wayfaring as Schleiermacher considers it reachable for all. Of course the feeling of poverty, dependence, causal relationship and also intuition is personal that the empiricist should experience it, not being acquirable and realizable through being described by propositions. Neither mystical intuition nor intuitive knowledge is infallible as humans are fallible as to their knowledge of animate states, their knowledge of self and their mystical revelations. In Islamic philosophy, intuitive knowledge is considered innate meaning that humans possess a degree of knowledge while born, being acquired without mediation of mental concepts and forms. And a human s knowledge of his animate states and passions and perceptual faculties is of this kind of knowledge (Hussein Zadeh, 2006). Schleiermacher relates the way religion has emerged and formed to the innermost parts of human s nature arguing that this intuitive nature is not teachable (Ghanbari, 2007). If as expressed by Schleiermacher that the forming of religion in us is innate and if religiousness means possessing religious experience of causal relationship and perceiving one s self as an absolutely dependent being, then this knowledge can be considered as the innate knowledge intended by the sages being considered as a part of human s types of knowledge while born. CONCLUSION The epistemic model, in which the religious experience argument is introduced, as against what appears, isn t merely epistemological foundationalism, because in foundationalism, unjustified religious beliefs must be justified using basic and evident beliefs and they should be justifying per se. Yet the fundamental, basic and evident introduction of religious experience argument that is of the type of revelation and intuition is not quite evident and infallible because what Schleiermacher expresses about revelation and intuition is more like the intuitive knowledge intended by the sages and philosophers, not being infallible. Also in religious experience argument, against its appearance, the effects of non-epistemological factors such as pragmatic, psychological and sociological factors have been taken into account. Religious experiences are expressed in different forms

8 confirming the effects of presuppositions, society, text as well as the knower s psychological and social conditions on forming religious experience. It is also a pragmatic argument that, against Schleiermacher s claim, considers it beyond thought and action. The spiritual wayfaring process for satisfying the requirements of revelation and intuition and its pragmatic result intended by Schleiermacher, all and all indicate the pragmatic nature of religious experience argument. Going through the stages of spiritual wayfaring alludes to the stages of virtue-centeredness stages in reliabilism and the spiritual wayfaring process is the reliable process of acquiring religious belief in reliabilism. Religious experience argument can be interpreted according to both subjectivism perspective and objectivism perspective. The epistemic objectivism system looks like the epistemic model of traditional foundationalism being comprised of the basic and evident belief resulted from religious experience and non-basic rational beliefs. Descriptive propositions of experience as well as non-basic rational and religious beliefs are justified based on religious experiences. Yet basic beliefs are self-justifying as being empirical. The epistemic objectivism system looks like the epistemic model of textualisn as it confirms non-epistemological effects such as sociological factors. It also looks like the epistemic virtue-centered reliabilism as it takes into account the reliable process of belief realization and considers some pragmatic factors such as humanity s effects on the assured religious belief, attainment of experience in humans relationship and the active role of religious experience in life, like virtue-centered reliabilists consideration of pragmatic elements. Regardless of its epistemological principles and against Schleiermacher s perspective, religious experience argument doesn t have essential difference with the ontological argument, as religious experiment is of the nature of knowledge and has a conceptual element. Religious experience argument, like ontological argument, starts from the concept of god and finally god s objective existence is proved in the external world. Against Schleiermacher s viewpoint, religious experience argument is not immune from the interference of human s beliefs, notions and concepts even though it is formed within the realm of emotions and sensations. Yet the realm of sensations is not immune from the interference of human s concepts, notions and psyche and sensations are formed through concepts. As concepts form sensation, god s concept is the rational prerequisite to the argument. As expressed by Schleiermacher, what differentiates religious experience argument from ontological argument is its non-deductive nature, while the contrary was proven. If religious experience is the creator and creature relationship as Schleiermacher believes, it will be a causal relationship resulted by deduction and the perception of cause and effects is an abstract perception. Hence, abstraction deals with intellect not revelation and intuition. REFERENCE Abasi V Religious experience, religious belief and religious pluralism (3 rd year, vol.2 ). Kosar Maaref publications Abasian M Practical basics of epistemology (3 rd year, vol.1). Hekmat and Marefat (journal) Anxali S Language, epistemology and mysticism (by Stevens, K.). Qom: Iran s Islamic sciences inst. Ghanbari H Religion and religiousness in Schleiermacher s theology. Andishe Dini quarterly. Shiraz University Hassanzadeh Amoli H Avicenna Alesharat and Altanbihat. Qom: Alalam Eslami publications Hussein zadeh M Intuitive knowledge, philosophical knowledge, no. 13 Kung H Great Christian Thinkers, Continuum. Mehdi Nejad H Pictorial theory of language with an emphasis on its epistemological requirements (vol1). Nameh Hekmat Muhammad Zadeh R Epistemology: an introduction to the cognition theory (by Puyman Luee pi).tehran: Imam Sadegh University. Otto R The Idea Of The Holy, Trans J.W.Harvey, New York: Oxford University Press, Rotledge Enc, 709, pp: Sohrvardee S Hekmat Aleshragh: Collection of Monsefate Shekhol Eshragh (vol.2). Tehran: Islamic sciences and cultural studies research center. Yazadini A Religious experience (by Pradofut Vin). Qom: Ketab Taha

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics

More information

Mulla Sadra and Hume on Comparative Analyzing of Causality *

Mulla Sadra and Hume on Comparative Analyzing of Causality * University of Tabriz-Iran Journal of Philosophical Investigations ISSN (print): 2251-7960/ (online): 2423-4419 Vol. 12/ No. 24/ fall 2018 Mulla Sadra and Hume on Comparative Analyzing of Causality * Qodratullah

More information

Introduction: Discussion:

Introduction: Discussion: Science Arena Publications International Journal of Philosophy and Social-Psychological Sciences Available online at www.sciarena.com 2016, Vol, 2 (4): 1-7 The Theory of Knowledge in Western and Eastern

More information

Skepticism and Internalism

Skepticism and Internalism Skepticism and Internalism John Greco Abstract: This paper explores a familiar skeptical problematic and considers some strategies for responding to it. Section 1 reconstructs and disambiguates the skeptical

More information

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology 1. Introduction Ryan C. Smith Philosophy 125W- Final Paper April 24, 2010 Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology Throughout this paper, the goal will be to accomplish three

More information

24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy

24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy 1 Plan: Kant Lecture #2: How are pure mathematics and pure natural science possible? 1. Review: Problem of Metaphysics 2. Kantian Commitments 3. Pure Mathematics 4. Transcendental Idealism 5. Pure Natural

More information

Rationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt

Rationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses

More information

From the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy

From the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy From the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Epistemology Peter D. Klein Philosophical Concept Epistemology is one of the core areas of philosophy. It is concerned with the nature, sources and limits

More information

Introduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )

Introduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible ) Philosophical Proof of God: Derived from Principles in Bernard Lonergan s Insight May 2014 Robert J. Spitzer, S.J., Ph.D. Magis Center of Reason and Faith Lonergan s proof may be stated as follows: Introduction

More information

Methods for Knowing Transphysical Truths and Its Obstacles in Transcendent Philosophy

Methods for Knowing Transphysical Truths and Its Obstacles in Transcendent Philosophy Abstracts 9 Methods for Knowing Transphysical Truths and Its Obstacles in Transcendent Philosophy Ali Allahbedashti * In transcendent philosophy (al-hikmahal-mota aliyah) we encounter with some transphysical

More information

From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction

From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant

More information

Testimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Introduction

Testimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Introduction 24 Testimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Abstract: In this paper, I address Linda Zagzebski s analysis of the relation between moral testimony and understanding arguing that Aquinas

More information

Can A Priori Justified Belief Be Extended Through Deduction? It is often assumed that if one deduces some proposition p from some premises

Can A Priori Justified Belief Be Extended Through Deduction? It is often assumed that if one deduces some proposition p from some premises Can A Priori Justified Belief Be Extended Through Deduction? Introduction It is often assumed that if one deduces some proposition p from some premises which one knows a priori, in a series of individually

More information

Epistemological Foundations for Koons Cosmological Argument?

Epistemological Foundations for Koons Cosmological Argument? Epistemological Foundations for Koons Cosmological Argument? Koons (2008) argues for the very surprising conclusion that any exception to the principle of general causation [i.e., the principle that everything

More information

Development of Soul Through Contemplation and Action Seen from the Viewpoint of lslamic Philosophers and Gnostics

Development of Soul Through Contemplation and Action Seen from the Viewpoint of lslamic Philosophers and Gnostics 3 Development of Soul Through Contemplation and Action Seen from the Viewpoint of lslamic Philosophers and Gnostics Dr. Hossein Ghaffari Associate professor, University of Tehran For a long time, philosophers

More information

Philosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism

Philosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism Michael Huemer on Skepticism Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology Topic 3 - Skepticism Chapter II. The Lure of Radical Skepticism 1. Mike Huemer defines radical skepticism as follows: Philosophical skeptics

More information

In Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006

In Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006 In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

More information

A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES

A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES CHANHYU LEE Emory University It seems somewhat obscure that there is a concrete connection between epistemology and ethics; a study of knowledge and a study of moral

More information

Cartesian Rationalism

Cartesian Rationalism Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he

More information

Cartesian Rationalism

Cartesian Rationalism Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he

More information

Wright on response-dependence and self-knowledge

Wright on response-dependence and self-knowledge Wright on response-dependence and self-knowledge March 23, 2004 1 Response-dependent and response-independent concepts........... 1 1.1 The intuitive distinction......................... 1 1.2 Basic equations

More information

! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.

! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes. ! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! What is the relation between that knowledge and that given in the sciences?! Key figure: René

More information

Kant and his Successors

Kant and his Successors Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics

More information

Arius and Arianism in Christianity: Grounds and consequences

Arius and Arianism in Christianity: Grounds and consequences Arius and Arianism in Christianity: Grounds and consequences Hossain Kalbasi Ashtari 1, Sara Ghezelbash 2 1. Professor of Philosophy, Allameh Tabatabaie University, Iran 2. Ph.D. Candidate, Philosophy

More information

The Middle Path: A Case for the Philosophical Theologian. Leo Strauss roots the vitality of Western civilization in the ongoing conflict between

The Middle Path: A Case for the Philosophical Theologian. Leo Strauss roots the vitality of Western civilization in the ongoing conflict between Lee Anne Detzel PHI 8338 Revised: November 1, 2004 The Middle Path: A Case for the Philosophical Theologian Leo Strauss roots the vitality of Western civilization in the ongoing conflict between philosophy

More information

The British Empiricism

The British Empiricism The British Empiricism Locke, Berkeley and Hume copyleft: nicolazuin.2018 nowxhere.wordpress.com The terrible heritage of Descartes: Skepticism, Empiricism, Rationalism The problem originates from the

More information

foundationalism and coherentism are responses to it. I will then prove that, although

foundationalism and coherentism are responses to it. I will then prove that, although 1 In this paper I will explain what the Agrippan Trilemma is and explain they ways that foundationalism and coherentism are responses to it. I will then prove that, although foundationalism and coherentism

More information

Biola University: An Ontology of Knowledge Course Points discussed 5/27/97

Biola University: An Ontology of Knowledge Course Points discussed 5/27/97 Biola University: An Ontology of Knowledge Course Points discussed 5/27/97 1. Formal requirements of the course. Prepared class participation. 3 short (17 to 18 hundred words) papers (assigned on Thurs,

More information

Neo-Confucianism: Metaphysics, Mind, and Morality

Neo-Confucianism: Metaphysics, Mind, and Morality Neo-Confucianism: Metaphysics, Mind, and Morality BOOK PROSPECTUS JeeLoo Liu CONTENTS: SUMMARY OF CHAPTERS Since these selected Neo-Confucians had similar philosophical concerns and their various philosophical

More information

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories

More information

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 22 Lecture - 22 Kant The idea of Reason Soul, God

More information

Analyzing the Epistemic and Ontologic Foundations of Halqe's School Based on Islamic Philosophy

Analyzing the Epistemic and Ontologic Foundations of Halqe's School Based on Islamic Philosophy 145 Abstracts Analyzing the Epistemic and Ontologic Foundations of Halqe's School Based on Islamic Philosophy Valiee Abarghooee, A. Mohammadi, A. ** Objectives: The main Purpose of this paper is to compare

More information

Varieties of Apriority

Varieties of Apriority S E V E N T H E X C U R S U S Varieties of Apriority T he notions of a priori knowledge and justification play a central role in this work. There are many ways in which one can understand the a priori,

More information

IJBPAS, June, 2015, 4(6): REASON AND ITS EPISTEMOLOGY IN AVICENNA S PERSPECTIVE

IJBPAS, June, 2015, 4(6): REASON AND ITS EPISTEMOLOGY IN AVICENNA S PERSPECTIVE : 3948-3956 ISSN: 2277 4998 REASON AND ITS EPISTEMOLOGY IN AVICENNA S PERSPECTIVE GHOLAMREZA REZAI SERAJI Department of Sufi Muslim and mystics, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Branch,

More information

Moral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary

Moral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,

More information

to representationalism, then we would seem to miss the point on account of which the distinction between direct realism and representationalism was

to representationalism, then we would seem to miss the point on account of which the distinction between direct realism and representationalism was Intentional Transfer in Averroes, Indifference of Nature in Avicenna, and the Issue of the Representationalism of Aquinas Comments on Max Herrera and Richard Taylor Is Aquinas a representationalist or

More information

Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge

Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the

More information

spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7

spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7 24.500 spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7 teatime self-knowledge 24.500 S05 1 plan self-blindness, one more time Peacocke & Co. immunity to error through misidentification: Shoemaker s self-reference

More information

1/9. The Second Analogy (1)

1/9. The Second Analogy (1) 1/9 The Second Analogy (1) This week we are turning to one of the most famous, if also longest, arguments in the Critique. This argument is both sufficiently and the interpretation of it sufficiently disputed

More information

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPIRIT OF ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPIRIT OF ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPIRIT OF ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY Omar S. Alattas Alfred North Whitehead would tell us that religion is a system of truths that have an effect of transforming character when they are

More information

McDowell and the New Evil Genius

McDowell and the New Evil Genius 1 McDowell and the New Evil Genius Ram Neta and Duncan Pritchard 0. Many epistemologists both internalists and externalists regard the New Evil Genius Problem (Lehrer & Cohen 1983) as constituting an important

More information

The Creation of the World in Time According to Fakhr al-razi

The Creation of the World in Time According to Fakhr al-razi Kom, 2017, vol. VI (2) : 49 75 UDC: 113 Рази Ф. 28-172.2 Рази Ф. doi: 10.5937/kom1702049H Original scientific paper The Creation of the World in Time According to Fakhr al-razi Shiraz Husain Agha Faculty

More information

Do we have knowledge of the external world?

Do we have knowledge of the external world? Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our

More information

Kant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion *

Kant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion * University of Tabriz-Iran Philosophical Investigations Vol. 11/ No. 21/ Fall & Winter 2017 Kant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion * Qodratullah Qorbani ** Associate Professor of Philosophy, Kharazmi

More information

In Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg

In Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg 1 In Search of the Ontological Argument Richard Oxenberg Abstract We can attend to the logic of Anselm's ontological argument, and amuse ourselves for a few hours unraveling its convoluted word-play, or

More information

Précis of Empiricism and Experience. Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh

Précis of Empiricism and Experience. Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh Précis of Empiricism and Experience Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh My principal aim in the book is to understand the logical relationship of experience to knowledge. Say that I look out of my window

More information

Ayer and Quine on the a priori

Ayer and Quine on the a priori Ayer and Quine on the a priori November 23, 2004 1 The problem of a priori knowledge Ayer s book is a defense of a thoroughgoing empiricism, not only about what is required for a belief to be justified

More information

Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View

Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319532363 Carlo Cellucci Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View 1 Preface From its very beginning, philosophy has been viewed as aimed at knowledge and methods to

More information

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL? WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL? Beliefs don t trump facts in the real world. People almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.

More information

THE STUDY OF UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABILITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY

THE STUDY OF UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABILITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY THE STUDY OF UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABILITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY Subhankari Pati Research Scholar Pondicherry University, Pondicherry The present aim of this paper is to highlights the shortcomings in Kant

More information

Intro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2

Intro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2 Intro to Philosophy Review for Exam 2 Epistemology Theory of Knowledge What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know

More information

Thursday, November 30, 17. Hegel s Idealism

Thursday, November 30, 17. Hegel s Idealism Hegel s Idealism G. W. F. Hegel Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) was perhaps the last great philosophical system builder. His distinctively dynamic form of idealism set the stage for other

More information

Philosophy of Religion

Philosophy of Religion Philosophy of Religion Editorial Board: Aavani, Gholam Reza Professor, Shahid Beheshti University Ahmadi, Ahmad Professor, University of Tehran Akbari, Reza Associate Professor, Imam Sadeq University Alizamani,

More information

What Should We Believe?

What Should We Believe? 1 What Should We Believe? Thomas Kelly, University of Notre Dame James Pryor, Princeton University Blackwell Publishers Consider the following question: What should I believe? This question is a normative

More information

Freedom as Morality. UWM Digital Commons. University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. Hao Liang University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Theses and Dissertations

Freedom as Morality. UWM Digital Commons. University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. Hao Liang University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Theses and Dissertations University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2014 Freedom as Morality Hao Liang University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.uwm.edu/etd

More information

3. Knowledge and Justification

3. Knowledge and Justification THE PROBLEMS OF KNOWLEDGE 11 3. Knowledge and Justification We have been discussing the role of skeptical arguments in epistemology and have already made some progress in thinking about reasoning and belief.

More information

KNOWLEDGE OF SELF AND THE WORLD

KNOWLEDGE OF SELF AND THE WORLD Journal of the Evangelical Philosophical Society, Vol. 10, 1987 KNOWLEDGE OF SELF AND THE WORLD STEPHEN M. CLINTON Introduction Don Hagner (1981) writes, "And if the evangelical does not reach out and

More information

Tuesday, November 11, Hegel s Idealism

Tuesday, November 11, Hegel s Idealism Hegel s Idealism G. W. F. Hegel Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) was perhaps the last great philosophical system builder. His distinctively dynamic form of idealism set the stage for other

More information

GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks)

GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks) GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks) Chapter 1 CONCEPT OF PHILOSOPHY (4 marks allotted) MCQ 1X2 = 2 SAQ -- 1X2 = 2 (a) Nature of Philosophy: The word Philosophy is originated from two Greek words Philos

More information

THE CONGRUITY AMONG AYN RAND S METAPHYSICS, EPISTEMOLOGY, VALUE THEORY, AND ETHICS

THE CONGRUITY AMONG AYN RAND S METAPHYSICS, EPISTEMOLOGY, VALUE THEORY, AND ETHICS THE CONGRUITY AMONG AYN RAND S METAPHYSICS, EPISTEMOLOGY, VALUE THEORY, AND ETHICS Professor Edward W. Younkins Libertarian Alliance Philosophical Notes No. 74 ISBN 1 85637 702 4 ISSN 0267-7091 2004: Libertarian

More information

Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke,

Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke, Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Pp. 208. Price 60.) In this interesting book, Ted Poston delivers an original and

More information

Chapter Six. Aristotle s Theory of Causation and the Ideas of Potentiality and Actuality

Chapter Six. Aristotle s Theory of Causation and the Ideas of Potentiality and Actuality Chapter Six Aristotle s Theory of Causation and the Ideas of Potentiality and Actuality Key Words: Form and matter, potentiality and actuality, teleological, change, evolution. Formal cause, material cause,

More information

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire. KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism

More information

The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology

The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology Oxford Scholarship Online You are looking at 1-10 of 21 items for: booktitle : handbook phimet The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology Paul K. Moser (ed.) Item type: book DOI: 10.1093/0195130057.001.0001 This

More information

A Research Journal of Epistemology and Related Fields Vol.18/ No.72/ winter.2018

A Research Journal of Epistemology and Related Fields Vol.18/ No.72/ winter.2018 A Research Journal of Epistemology and Related Fields Vol.18/ No.72/ winter.2018 Executive Director: Ali-Akbar Rashad Editor-in-Chief: Ali Reza Qaeminia Published by Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought

More information

Markie, Speckles, and Classical Foundationalism

Markie, Speckles, and Classical Foundationalism Markie, Speckles, and Classical Foundationalism In Classical Foundationalism and Speckled Hens Peter Markie presents a thoughtful and important criticism of my attempts to defend a traditional version

More information

1/12. The A Paralogisms

1/12. The A Paralogisms 1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude

More information

Is there a distinction between a priori and a posteriori

Is there a distinction between a priori and a posteriori Lingnan University Digital Commons @ Lingnan University Theses & Dissertations Department of Philosophy 2014 Is there a distinction between a priori and a posteriori Hiu Man CHAN Follow this and additional

More information

Orienting Social Epistemology 1 Francis Remedios, Independent Researcher, SERRC

Orienting Social Epistemology 1 Francis Remedios, Independent Researcher, SERRC Orienting Social Epistemology 1 Francis Remedios, Independent Researcher, SERRC Because Fuller s and Goldman s social epistemologies differ from each other in many respects, it is difficult to compare

More information

Objectivism and Education: A Response to David Elkind s The Problem with Constructivism

Objectivism and Education: A Response to David Elkind s The Problem with Constructivism Objectivism and Education: A Response to David Elkind s The Problem with Constructivism by Jamin Carson Abstract This paper responds to David Elkind s article The Problem with Constructivism, published

More information

Christian Evidences. The Verification of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 06 of 12

Christian Evidences. The Verification of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 06 of 12 Christian Evidences CA312 LESSON 06 of 12 Victor M. Matthews, STD Former Professor of Systematic Theology Grand Rapids Theological Seminary This is lecture 6 of the course entitled Christian Evidences.

More information

The Comparison of Subjectivism in Idealism with the Suhrawardi's Subjectivism

The Comparison of Subjectivism in Idealism with the Suhrawardi's Subjectivism International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences Online: 2015-09-01 ISSN: 2300-2697, Vol. 58, pp 36-40 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.58.36 2015 SciPress Ltd., Switzerland The Comparison of

More information

Robert Audi, The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and. Substance of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Pp. xvi, 286.

Robert Audi, The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and. Substance of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Pp. xvi, 286. Robert Audi, The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Pp. xvi, 286. Reviewed by Gilbert Harman Princeton University August 19, 2002

More information

Chapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1

Chapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 Chapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 In chapter 1, Clark reviews the purpose of Christian apologetics, and then proceeds to briefly review the failures of secular

More information

Epistemology Naturalized

Epistemology Naturalized Epistemology Naturalized Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 15 Introduction to Philosophy: Theory of Knowledge Spring 2010 The Big Picture Thesis (Naturalism) Naturalism maintains

More information

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated

More information

ETHICS AND THE FUTURE OF HUMANKIND, REALITY OF THE HUMAN EXISTENCE

ETHICS AND THE FUTURE OF HUMANKIND, REALITY OF THE HUMAN EXISTENCE European Journal of Science and Theology, June 2016, Vol.12, No.3, 133-138 ETHICS AND THE FUTURE OF HUMANKIND, Abstract REALITY OF THE HUMAN EXISTENCE Lidia-Cristha Ungureanu * Ștefan cel Mare University,

More information

A. Aristotle D. Descartes B. Plato E. Hume

A. Aristotle D. Descartes B. Plato E. Hume A. Aristotle D. Kant B. Plato E. Mill C. Confucius 1....pleasure, and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends. 2. Courage is not only the knowledge of the hopeful and the fearful, but

More information

1/5. The Critique of Theology

1/5. The Critique of Theology 1/5 The Critique of Theology The argument of the Transcendental Dialectic has demonstrated that there is no science of rational psychology and that the province of any rational cosmology is strictly limited.

More information

Korsgaard and Non-Sentient Life ABSTRACT

Korsgaard and Non-Sentient Life ABSTRACT 74 Between the Species Korsgaard and Non-Sentient Life ABSTRACT Christine Korsgaard argues for the moral status of animals and our obligations to them. She grounds this obligation on the notion that we

More information

Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)

Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology

More information

Moral Obligation. by Charles G. Finney

Moral Obligation. by Charles G. Finney Moral Obligation by Charles G. Finney The idea of obligation, or of oughtness, is an idea of the pure reason. It is a simple, rational conception, and, strictly speaking, does not admit of a definition,

More information

Epistemological Externalism and the Project of Traditional Epistemology. Contemporary philosophers still haven't come to terms with the project of

Epistemological Externalism and the Project of Traditional Epistemology. Contemporary philosophers still haven't come to terms with the project of Epistemological Externalism and the Project of Traditional Epistemology 1 Epistemological Externalism and the Project of Traditional Epistemology Contemporary philosophers still haven't come to terms with

More information

Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies

Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies ST503 LESSON 16 of 24 John S. Feinberg, Ph.D. Experience: Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. At

More information

The Challenge of God. Julia Grubich

The Challenge of God. Julia Grubich The Challenge of God Julia Grubich Classical theism, refers to St. Thomas Aquinas de deo uno in the Summa Theologia, which is also known as the Doctrine of God. Over time there have been many people who

More information

Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification. Erik J. Olsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Pp. xiii, 232.

Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification. Erik J. Olsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Pp. xiii, 232. Against Coherence: Page 1 To appear in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification. Erik J. Olsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Pp. xiii,

More information

THE FREEDOM OF THE WILL By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781)

THE FREEDOM OF THE WILL By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) THE FREEDOM OF THE WILL By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) From: A447/B475 A451/B479 Freedom independence of the laws of nature is certainly a deliverance from restraint, but it is also

More information

A Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke

A Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke A Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke Roghieh Tamimi and R. P. Singh Center for philosophy, Social Science School, Jawaharlal Nehru University,

More information

Mohammad Reza Vaez Shahrestani. University of Bonn

Mohammad Reza Vaez Shahrestani. University of Bonn Philosophy Study, November 2017, Vol. 7, No. 11, 595-600 doi: 10.17265/2159-5313/2017.11.002 D DAVID PUBLISHING Defending Davidson s Anti-skepticism Argument: A Reply to Otavio Bueno Mohammad Reza Vaez

More information

PH 1000 Introduction to Philosophy, or PH 1001 Practical Reasoning

PH 1000 Introduction to Philosophy, or PH 1001 Practical Reasoning DEREE COLLEGE SYLLABUS FOR: PH 3118 THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE (previously PH 2118) (Updated SPRING 2016) PREREQUISITES: CATALOG DESCRIPTION: RATIONALE: LEARNING OUTCOMES: METHOD OF TEACHING AND LEARNING: UK

More information

- We might, now, wonder whether the resulting concept of justification is sufficiently strong. According to BonJour, apparent rational insight is

- We might, now, wonder whether the resulting concept of justification is sufficiently strong. According to BonJour, apparent rational insight is BonJour I PHIL410 BonJour s Moderate Rationalism - BonJour develops and defends a moderate form of Rationalism. - Rationalism, generally (as used here), is the view according to which the primary tool

More information

Introduction to Philosophy Practice Exam One. True or False A = True, B= False

Introduction to Philosophy Practice Exam One. True or False A = True, B= False Introduction to Philosophy Practice Exam One True or False A = True, B= False 1. Epistemology mainly asks us to consider the question, how do we know anything. 2. The objective and subjective aspects of

More information

Ideas Have Consequences

Ideas Have Consequences Introduction Our interest in this series is whether God can be known or not and, if he does exist and is knowable, then how may we truly know him and to what degree. We summarized the debate over God s

More information

Epistemology. Theory of Knowledge

Epistemology. Theory of Knowledge Epistemology Theory of Knowledge Epistemological Questions What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know x? What

More information

Robert Kiely Office Hours: Tuesday 1-3, Wednesday 1-3, and by appointment

Robert Kiely Office Hours: Tuesday 1-3, Wednesday 1-3, and by appointment A History of Philosophy: Nature, Certainty, and the Self Fall, 2018 Robert Kiely oldstuff@imsa.edu Office Hours: Tuesday 1-3, Wednesday 1-3, and by appointment Description How do we know what we know?

More information

Important dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )

Important dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( ) PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since 1600 Dr. Peter Assmann Spring 2018 Important dates Feb 14 Term paper draft due Upload paper to E-Learning https://elearning.utdallas.edu

More information

Received: 30 August 2007 / Accepted: 16 November 2007 / Published online: 28 December 2007 # Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

Received: 30 August 2007 / Accepted: 16 November 2007 / Published online: 28 December 2007 # Springer Science + Business Media B.V. Acta anal. (2007) 22:267 279 DOI 10.1007/s12136-007-0012-y What Is Entitlement? Albert Casullo Received: 30 August 2007 / Accepted: 16 November 2007 / Published online: 28 December 2007 # Springer Science

More information

INTUITION AND CONSCIOUS REASONING

INTUITION AND CONSCIOUS REASONING The Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 63, No. 253 October 2013 ISSN 0031-8094 doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.12071 INTUITION AND CONSCIOUS REASONING BY OLE KOKSVIK This paper argues that, contrary to common opinion,

More information

Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination

Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination MP_C13.qxd 11/23/06 2:29 AM Page 110 13 Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination [Article IV. Concerning Henry s Conclusion] In the fourth article I argue against the conclusion of [Henry s] view as follows:

More information

A Wesleyan Approach to Knowledge

A Wesleyan Approach to Knowledge Olivet Nazarene University Digital Commons @ Olivet Faculty Scholarship - Theology Theology 9-24-2012 A Wesleyan Approach to Knowledge Kevin Twain Lowery Olivet Nazarene University, klowery@olivet.edu

More information