# ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 ARGUMENTS Arguments arguments 1 Argument Worksheet 1. An argument is a collection of propositions with one proposition, the conclusion, following from the other propositions, the premises. Inference is a process of arriving at a conclusion by means of other propositions and the relationship they bear to each other. 2. DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS: Arguments in which the arguer maintains that the argument is valid. The arguer also hopes that the argument is sound. 3. VALIDITY: An argument is valid if and only if given the truth of its premises, the conclusion must follow. Stated another way, a valid argument is one in which it is impossible for the conclusion to be false and the premises true. 2

2 Argument Worksheet 4. Two ways for a deductive argument to go wrong: Either (i) an argument will have false premises, or (ii) the conclusion can fail to follow from true premises. 5. INVALID ARGUMENTS: An invalid argument is one in which the conclusion does not follow from the premises. 6. SOUNDNESS: A sound argument is one in which both the premises are true and the argument is valid. 7. UNSOUND ARGUMENTS: An unsound argument is one in which either at least one of the premises is false or the argument is invalid. 8. All sound arguments are valid. Some valid arguments are unsound. All invalid arguments are unsound. Some unsound arguments are valid. 3 Argument Worksheet 9. INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS: Arguments in which the arguer maintains that it is improbable that the conclusion is false given true premises. The premises of inductive arguments are about past instances. The conclusions of inductive arguments make claims about present and future cases based on the past instances stated in the premises. Inductive arguments are not deductively valid. Inductive arguments admit of degrees of strength and weakness. 10. RATIONAL PERSUASIVENESS: An argument is rationally persuasive if (i) a person has more reason to believe the premises are true rather than false; (ii) the premises are relevant to the conclusion; and (iii) the premises provide adequate evidence or grounds for the truth of the conclusion (deductively or inductively) given the truth of the premises. Deductively sound arguments are always rationally persuasive. 4

3 Argument (a, b) (a) 1. All teachers have beards. 2. Schmid is a teacher. 3. Therefore, Schmid has a beard. valid unsound (b) 1. All teachers are younger than Schmid is a teacher. 3. Schmid is younger than 30. valid unsound 5 Argument (c, d) (c) 1. All humans are mortal.! 2. Socrates is human. 3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. valid sound (d) 1. Abortion is wrong. 2. Thus, abortion is wrong. valid sound/unsound? 6

4 Argument (e, f) (e) 1. If Socrates is human, then Socrates is mortal. 2. Socrates is human. 3. Socrates is mortal. valid sound (f) 1. All spiders have ten legs. 2. All ten-legged creatures have wings. 3. All spiders have wings. valid unsound 7 Argument (g, h) (g) 1. If I owned all the gold in Fort Knox, then I would be wealthy. 2. I do not own all the gold in Fort Knox. 3. Therefore, I am not wealthy. invalid (all true premises) (h) 1. Some philosophy professors are wealthy. 2. Schmid is a philosophy professor. 3. Schmid is wealthy. invalid 8

5 Argument (i, j) (i) 1. Some humans teach philosophy. 2. Schmid is a human. 3. Schmid teaches philosophy. invalid (all true premises) (j) 1. No one gets an A in philosophy unless he or she works hard. 2. Waldo works hard. invalid 3. Waldo gets an A. 9 Argument (k) (k) 1. If one directly kills an innocent, then one commits murder. 2. Abortion directly kills an innocent. 3. Abortion is murder. 4. Murder is morally impermissible. valid sound/unsound? 5. Therefore, abortion is morally impermissible. 10

6 Weak and Strong Inductive Arguments A 1. This herd includes 100 head of cattle. 2. Two randomly selected members of the herd have mad cow disease. 3. Therefore, probably all members of the herd have mad cow disease. B 1. This herd includes 100 head of cattle. 2. Eighty randomly selected members of the herd have mad cow disease. 3. Therefore, probably all members of the herd have mad cow disease. 11 CONCLUSION-INDICATORS therefore! hence! thus so! accordingly! in consequence consequently! proves that! as a result for this reason! for these reasons! it follows that we may infer! I conclude that! which shows that which means that! which entails that! which implies that which allows us to conclude that! which points to the conclusion that 12

7 PREMISE-INDICATORS since! because! for as! follows from! as shown by inasmuch as! as indicated by! the reason is that for the reason that may be inferred from in view of the fact that may be deduced from! may be derived from 13 WESTON 14

8 Arguments General Points Arguments are sets of reasons in support of a conclusion. The purpose of an argument is to support one's view, to seek the meaning or justification for a position or belief, and to rationally persuade others. 15 Diagnosing an Argument 1. What is the conclusion? What is the point of the argument? What is the author (or you) trying to prove? The first step in diagnosing an argument is to discover the conclusion, whether your own or the author's. 2. What are the reasons for the conclusion? Why is torturing babies for fun wrong? The second step in diagnosing an argument is to list the reasons for the conclusion. 16

9 Presenting an Argument 1. Present your reasons in a "natural order." One idea, reason or thought should follow the other in a fashion that makes sense and flows according to the intentions of the argument. 2. Use strong premises. Weak premises will lead to a weak argument. 3. Be precise. The more direct, the better. 4. Use consistent terms and phrasings throughout the argument. 5. Maintain the same meaning for terms throughout. Define terms early and stick to those meanings. 17 Types of Argument Arguments by Example Arguments by Analogy Arguments from Authority Arguments about Causes Deductive Arguments 18

10 Definitions Use clear and specific terms If there are competing definitions for a term, use the clearest case Definitions are not arguments--don t use a definition to make an argument Clarify, clarify, clarify! 19 Fallacies (a very short list) 20

11 Ad Hominem attacking the person of alleged authority rather than his or her qualifications EX: Anyone who thinks abortion should not be legal are a bunch of chauvanistic pigs who think women should be barefoot in the kitchen. 21 Ad Ignorantiam (appeal to ignorance) arguing that a claim is true (false) just because it has not been shown to be false (true). Basic form: We don't know that statement S is false, or We have no reason to think that S is false. Therefore, S is (probably) true. We don't know that statement S is true, or We have no reason to think that S is true. Therefore, S is (probably) false. Both cases appeal to one's ignorance. Then, the argument tries to move from one's ignorance to claims about what is true or false. 22

12 Problem with Appeals to Ignorance Leads to contradiction I have no reason to think there aren't 30 students in this class. And, I have no reason to think there are 30 students in this class. So, there (probably) both are and are not 30 students in this class. Nothing follows from one's ignorance (except that one is ignorant). You don't get knowledge from ignorance. You just get more ignorance. If ignorance did lead to knowledge, the best way to get smart would be to stay stupid. 23 Ad Misericordiam (appeal to pity) appealing to pity as an argument for special treatment EX: I'm just such a miserable person, you ought to grant me special priviledges. 24

13 Begging the Question implicitly using your conclusion as a premise EX: God exists because it says so in the Bible, which I know is true because God wrote it, after all! 25 Complex Question posing a question or issue in such a way that a person cannot agree or disagree with you without committing him- or herself to some other claim you wish to promote "Will you follow your conscience, instead of your pocketbook, and donate to the cause?" Anyone who says "no," regardless of his or real reasons for not donating, is made to feel ignoble; anyone who says "yes," regardless of his or her real reasons for donating, is made to feel noble. 26

14 Composition & Division assuming that a whole must have the properties of its parts or that the parts must have the properties of the whole EX: Since the members of the team are fine athletes, the team must be a fine team. Or, since the team is the best in the league, the members of the team must be the best in the league. 27 Equivocation using a single word in more than one sense EX. A cat is an animal. Thus, a large cat is a large animal. A plane figure with four equal sides is a square. Squares are bores. Thus, a plane figure with four equal sides is a bore. 28

15 False Dilemma reducing the options you consider to just two, often sharply opposed and unfair to the person against whom the dilemma is posed "Since the universe could not have been created out of nothingness, it must have been created by an intelligent lifeforce " Is creation by an intelligent life-force the only other possibility? 29 Straw Man caricaturing an opposing view so that it is easy to refute often involves making an argument so simple or stupid that anyone would disagree with it 30

16 Appeal to False Authority Appeal to some authority or expert to support one's position when one has no expertise in what is being claimed Form of arguments from authority Dr. Authority thinks or says that X is true. Therefore, X is true. The assumption is that Dr. A would not say X is true unless X really is true. But, what makes for a good authority? 31 Authority Checklist 1. The authority really made the claim being attributed to him/her 2. The authority's claim is in an objective realm of discourse (chemistry and not astrology) 3. The authority really is an expert on that subject 4. Other authorities in the field generally agree with the expert's claims or methods 5. The authority is a reliable person when reporting on the particular subject matter 32

17 Ad Populum appealing to the emotions of a crowd. Also, appealing to a person to "go along" with the crowd. EX: "Everyone s doing it!" Ad populum is a good example of a bad argument from authority: no reasons are offered to show that "everybody" is an informed or impartial source 33

What is an argument? PHIL 110 Lecture on Chapter 3 of How to think about weird things An argument is a collection of two or more claims, one of which is the conclusion and the rest of which are the premises.

### In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES Instructions: Determine whether the following are propositions. If some are not propositions, see if they can be rewritten as propositions. (1) I have a very refined sense of smell.

### Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant when they do not 1 Non Sequitur Latin for it does

### 1.6 Validity and Truth

M01_COPI1396_13_SE_C01.QXD 10/10/07 9:48 PM Page 30 30 CHAPTER 1 Basic Logical Concepts deductive arguments about probabilities themselves, in which the probability of a certain combination of events is

### This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

So what do fallacies look like? For each fallacy listed, there is a definition or explanation, an example, and a tip on how to avoid committing the fallacy in your own arguments. Hasty generalization Definition:

### Logical (formal) fallacies

Fallacies in academic writing Chad Nilep There are many possible sources of fallacy an idea that is mistakenly thought to be true, even though it may be untrue in academic writing. The phrase logical fallacy

### Evaluating Arguments

Govier: A Practical Study of Argument 1 Evaluating Arguments Chapter 4 begins an important discussion on how to evaluate arguments. The basics on how to evaluate arguments are presented in this chapter

### Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan. Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Part-Whole Relations

CRITICAL THINKING Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan LECTURE 8! Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Part-Whole Relations Summary In this lecture, we will learn three more

### 1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims In the previous tutorial we saw that the standard of acceptability of a statement (or premise) depends on the context. In certain contexts we may only require

### Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to

### Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111) Neils Bohr (1885 1962) to Einstein: You are not thinking. You are merely being logical. Reason is one of the four ways of knowing: Perception Language Emotion

### Philosophical Arguments

Philosophical Arguments An introduction to logic and philosophical reasoning. Nathan D. Smith, PhD. Houston Community College Nathan D. Smith. Some rights reserved You are free to copy this book, to distribute

### Handout 2 Argument Terminology

Handout 2 Argument Terminology 1. Arguing, Arguments, & Statements Open Question: What happens when two people are in an argument? An argument is an abstraction from what goes on when people arguing. An

### FALLACIES IN GENERAL IRRELEVANCE AMBIGUITY UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTIONS. Informal Fallacies. PHIL UA-70: Logic. February 17 19, 2015

Informal Fallacies PHIL UA-70: Logic February 17 19, 2015 OUTLINE FALLACIES IN GENERAL FALLACIES OF IRRELEVANCE FALLACIES INVOLVING AMBIGUITY FALLACIES INVOLVING UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTIONS OUTLINE FALLACIES

### Reductionism in Fallacy Theory

Reductionism in Fallacy Theory Christoph Lumer (Appeared in: Argumentation 14 (2000). Pp. 405-423.) ABSTRACT: (1) The aim of the paper is to develop a reduction of fallacy theory, i.e. to "deduce" fallacy

### Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Argument and Persuasion Stating Opinions and Proposals The Method It all starts with an opinion - something that people can agree or disagree with. The Method Move to action Speak your mind Convince someone

### Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

Practice Test Three Spring 2015 True or False True = A, False = B 1. A sound argument is a valid deductive argument with true premisses. 2. A conclusion is a statement of support. 3. An easy way to determine

### 2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

National Qualifications 06 06 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 06 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only

### Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics because, since, given that, for because Given that Since for Because

Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics It is useful to think of an argument as a list of sentences.[1] The last sentence is the conclusion, and the other sentences are the premises. Thus: (1) No professors

### I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science This seems to be a common world view that many people hold today. It is important that when we look at statements like this we spend a proper amount of time

### Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz Please take out a few pieces of paper and a pen or pencil. Write your name, the date, your class period, and a title at the top of the

### PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1 W# Section (10 or 11) 1. True or False (5 points) Directions: Circle the letter next to the best answer. 1. T F All true statements are valid. 2. T

### Self-evident Truths. Fallacy Number Eleven

15 Self-evident Truths Fallacy Number Eleven LOGICAL arguments, as emphasized earlier, depend on certain assumptions or premises. If the premises are false, or are such that they cannot be verified, the

### Test Item File. Full file at

Test Item File 107 CHAPTER 1 Chapter 1: Basic Logical Concepts Multiple Choice 1. In which of the following subjects is reasoning outside the concern of logicians? A) science and medicine B) ethics C)

### MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC FOR PRIVATE REGISTRATION TO BA PHILOSOPHY PROGRAMME 1. Logic is the science of-----------. A) Thought B) Beauty C) Mind D) Goodness 2. Aesthetics is the science of ------------.

### A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

1 A Brief Introduction to Key Terms 5 A Brief Introduction to Key Terms 1.1 Arguments Arguments crop up in conversations, political debates, lectures, editorials, comic strips, novels, television programs,

### Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking. A good argument should: 1. be deductively valid (or inductively strong) and have all true premises; 2. have its validity and truth-of-premises be as evident

### Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

Practice Test Three Fall 2015 True or False True = A, False = B 1. The inclusive "or" means "A or B or both A and B." 2. The conclusion contains both the major term and the middle term. 3. "If, then" statements

### b) The meaning of "child" would need to be taken in the sense of age, as most people would find the idea of a young child going to jail as wrong.

Explanation for Question 1 in Quiz 8 by Norva Lo - Tuesday, 18 September 2012, 9:39 AM The following is the solution for Question 1 in Quiz 8: (a) Which term in the argument is being equivocated. (b) What

### Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments 1. HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT Example 1. Socrates must be mortal. After all, all humans are mortal, and Socrates is a human. What does the author of this

### Charles Saunders Peirce ( )

Charles Saunders Peirce (1839-1914) Few persons care to study logic, because everybody conceives himself to be proficient enough in the art of reasoning already. But I observe that this satisfaction is

### Exposition of Symbolic Logic with Kalish-Montague derivations

An Exposition of Symbolic Logic with Kalish-Montague derivations Copyright 2006-13 by Terence Parsons all rights reserved Aug 2013 Preface The system of logic used here is essentially that of Kalish &

### CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

CRITICAL THINKING FAULTY REASONING (VAUGHN CH. 5) LECTURE PROFESSOR JULIE YOO Formal v Informal Fallacies Irrelevant Premises Genetic Fallacy Composition Division Appeal to the Person (ad hominem/tu quoque)

### Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS Rhetorical Appeals Ethos Appeals to credibility Pathos Appeals to emotion Logos Appeals to logic Structure of an Analysis/Argument Arguments operate under logic Your

### HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

What does it mean to provide an argument for a statement? To provide an argument for a statement is an activity we carry out both in our everyday lives and within the sciences. We provide arguments for

### A Modern Defense of Religious Authority

Linda Zagzebski A Modern Defense of Religious Authority 1. The Modern Rejection of Authority It has often been observed that one characteristic of the modern world is the utter rejection of authority,

### Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies 1 Learning Outcomes In this lesson we will: 1.Define logical fallacy using the SEE-I. 2.Understand and apply the concept of relevance. 3.Define,

### Rational Argument: Detailing the Parts

Rational Argument: Detailing the Parts A persuasive argument has four key components: the writer's claim the writer's use of logical reasoning and evidence in support of the claim the writer's calculated

### In Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006

In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

### Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them.

19 Chapter 3 19 CHAPTER 3: Logic Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them. The last proceeding of reason is to recognize

### Introduction. In light of these facts, we will ask, is killing animals for human benefit morally permissible?

Introduction In this unit, we will ask the questions, Is it morally permissible to cause or contribute to animal suffering? To answer this question, we will primarily focus on the suffering of animals

### LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT Deduction Fallacies Term Definition Example(s) 1 Equivocation Ambiguity 2 types: The word or phrase may be ambiguous, in which case it has more than one distinct meaning

### Basic Concepts and Distinctions 1 Logic Keith Burgess-Jackson 14 August 2017

Basic Concepts and Distinctions 1 Logic Keith Burgess-Jackson 14 August 2017 Terms in boldface type are defined somewhere in this handout. 1. Logic is the science of implication, or of valid inference

### Purdue OWL Logic in Argumentative Writing

Contributors: Ryan Weber, Allen Brizee. This resource covers using logic within writing, including logical vocabulary, logical fallacies, and other types of logos-based reasoning. This handout is designed

### Checklist to identify key assumptions (Browne & Keeley, 2010; Pherson & Pherson, 2013):

The following materials are adapted from Tan, C. (2007). Critical thinking skills: Identifying, analysing and evaluating arguments. IN Tan, C. (ED.), Engaging Films and Music Videos in Critical Thinking

### Statements, Arguments, Validity. Philosophy and Logic Unit 1, Sections 1.1, 1.2

Statements, Arguments, Validity Philosophy and Logic Unit 1, Sections 1.1, 1.2 Mayor Willy Brown on proposition 209: There is still rank discrimination in this country. If there is rank discrimination,

### Logic & Fallacies. An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition".

Introduction Logic & Fallacies There's a lot of debate on the net. Unfortunately, much of it is of very low quality. The aim of this document is to explain the basics of logical reasoning, and hopefully

### Logic, reasoning and fallacies. Example 0: valid reasoning. Decide how to make a random choice. Valid reasoning. Random choice of X, Y, Z, n

Logic, reasoning and fallacies and some puzzling Before we start Introductory Examples Karst Koymans Informatics Institute University of Amsterdam (version 16.3, 2016/11/21 12:58:26) Wednesday, November

### Critical Thinking Session Three. Fallacies I: Problems to do with the Source

Critical Thinking Session Three Fallacies I: Problems to do with the Source Rough Definition of Fallacy A Fallacy is a bad argument which may nonetheless be psychologically persuasive. Two Projects in

### HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by

### Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center

The Writing Center Fallacies Like 40 people like this. What this handout is about This handout discusses common logical fallacies that you may encounter in your own writing or the writing of others. The

### CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

Fall 2001 ENGLISH 20 Professor Tanaka CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS In this first handout, I would like to simply give you the basic outlines of our critical thinking model

### Replies to Hasker and Zimmerman. Trenton Merricks. Molinism: The Contemporary Debate edited by Ken Perszyk. Oxford University Press, I.

Replies to Hasker and Zimmerman Trenton Merricks Molinism: The Contemporary Debate edited by Ken Perszyk. Oxford University Press, 2011. I. Hasker Here is how arguments by reductio work: you show that

### 1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

I. LOGIC AND ARGUMENTATION 1 A. LOGIC 1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. 3. It doesn t attempt to determine how people in fact reason. 4.

### Logical Fallacies. Define the following logical fallacies and provide an example for each.

Logical Fallacies An argument is a chain of reasons that a person uses to support a claim or a conclusion. To use argument well, you need to know 1) how to draw logical conclusions from sound evidence

### The abuses of argument: Understanding fallacies on Toulmin's layout of argument

University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 10 May 22nd, 9:00 AM - May 25th, 5:00 PM The abuses of argument: Understanding fallacies on Toulmin's layout of argument Andrew

### Logic and Nosich s Elements

1 Logic and Nosich s Elements Most of you have learned something about logical fallacies (PHG pp. 37-38, WA ch. 5, and many other sources). These are traps in making a point that disconnect or misuse the

### 14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 1. Demonstrate the importance of ethics as part of the persuasion process. 2. Identify and provide examples of eight common

### ISSA Proceedings 1998 Wilson On Circular Arguments

ISSA Proceedings 1998 Wilson On Circular Arguments 1. Introduction In his paper Circular Arguments Kent Wilson (1988) argues that any account of the fallacy of begging the question based on epistemic conditions

### PRIMER CHART 1_LOGICAL FALLACIES

1 Some Important Rules to Remember 1 THE FOUR PRIMARY LAWS/PRINCIPLES OF LOGIC a. THE LAW OF (NON-) CONTRADICTION: is the first of the primary principles of logic. It states A is not non-a, in other words,

### Categorical Logic Handout Logic: Spring Sound: Any valid argument with true premises.

Categorical Logic Handout Logic: Spring 2017 Deductive argument: An argument whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth of its conclusion. Validity: A characteristic of any

### Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE

CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE Section 1. A Mediate Inference is a proposition that depends for proof upon two or more other propositions, so connected together by one or

### Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches

### What it means to be a New Testament Priest - 4/12/07 - Tape 3 - R.T. Nusbaum

What It Means To be A New Testament Priest -- Tape #3 1 Peter 2:4, "Ye as living stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus

### Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Lesson Seventeen The Conditional Syllogism Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5 It is clear then that the ostensive syllogisms are effected by means of the aforesaid figures; these considerations

### PHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1

Y e P a g e 1 Exercise 1 Pg. 17 1. When is an idea or statement valid? (trick question) A statement or an idea cannot be valid; they can only be true or false. Being valid or invalid are properties of

### HAVE WE REASON TO DO AS RATIONALITY REQUIRES? A COMMENT ON RAZ

HAVE WE REASON TO DO AS RATIONALITY REQUIRES? A COMMENT ON RAZ BY JOHN BROOME JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY SYMPOSIUM I DECEMBER 2005 URL: WWW.JESP.ORG COPYRIGHT JOHN BROOME 2005 HAVE WE REASON

### The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...

The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Defining induction... 2 3.0 Induction versus deduction... 2 4.0 Hume's descriptive

### Common Logical Fallacies

Common Logical Fallacies Effective arguments rely on logic and facts for support, yet speakers and authors, whether intentionally or unintentionally, can mislead an audience with a flaw in reasoning. Readers

### Logic Fallacies. Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere,

Description of Fallacies Logic Fallacies Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere, In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one

### I. What is an Argument?

I. What is an Argument? In philosophy, an argument is not a dispute or debate, but rather a structured defense of a claim (statement, assertion) about some topic. When making an argument, one does not

### The Art of Argument Classical Academic Press, 2010 Version 8.0

The Art of Argument Classical Academic Press, 2010 Version 8.0 ISBN: 978-1-60051-018-2 All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form

### Do we have knowledge of the external world?

Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our

### Logic in Argumentative Writing

Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/). When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice at bottom. Logic in Argumentative

### Validity & Soundness LECTURE 3! Critical Thinking. Summary: In this week s lectures, we will learn! (1) What it is for an argument to be valid.

Critical Thinking Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan LECTURE 3! Validity & Soundness Summary: In this week s lectures, we will learn! (1) What it is for an argument to be. (2)

### How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA

How To Recognize and Avoid Them Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA Fallacies are logical errors that weaken arguments Commonplace Can be persuasive to the uninformed Can be driven by agendas or strong

### Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Unit 4 Reason as a way of knowing I. Reasoning At its core, reasoning is using what is known as building blocks to create new knowledge I use the words logic and reasoning interchangeably. Technically,

### Moral Argument. Theistic Arguments: The Craig Program, 4. Edwin Chong. God makes sense of the objective moral values in the world.

Theistic Arguments: The Craig Program, 4 Edwin Chong March 13, 2005 Moral Argument God makes sense of the objective moral values in the world. March 2005 2 1 The Argument If God does not exist, objective

### A Solution to the Gettier Problem Keota Fields. the three traditional conditions for knowledge, have been discussed extensively in the

A Solution to the Gettier Problem Keota Fields Problem cases by Edmund Gettier 1 and others 2, intended to undermine the sufficiency of the three traditional conditions for knowledge, have been discussed

### What an argument is not

Expectations: As you go through this information on argumentation, you need to take notes in some fashion. You may simply print this document and bring it with you to class. You may also take notes like

### The One Fallacy Theory

The One Fallacy Theory LAWRENCE H. POWERS Wayne State University Key terms: Fallacy, begging the question, ambiguity, equivocation. Abstract: My One Fallacy theory says there is only one fallacy: equivocation,

### INDUCTION. All inductive reasoning is based on an assumption called the UNIFORMITY OF NATURE.

INDUCTION John Stuart Mill wrote the first comprehensive study of inductive logic. Deduction had been studied extensively since ancient times, but induction had to wait until the 19 th century! The cartoon

### CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

Logos Ethos Pathos Chapter 13 CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior. Persuasive speaking: process of doing so in

### Genuine dichotomies expressed using either/or statements are always true:

CRITICAL THINKING HANDOUT 13 DILEMMAS You re either part of the solution or you re part of the problem Attributed to Eldridge Cleaver, 1968 Over time it s going to be important for nations to know they

### Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Logical Fallacies Continuing our foray into the world of Argument Courtesy of: http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.html What is an argument? An argument is not the same thing as a contradiction..

### Kripke on the distinctness of the mind from the body

Kripke on the distinctness of the mind from the body Jeff Speaks April 13, 2005 At pp. 144 ff., Kripke turns his attention to the mind-body problem. The discussion here brings to bear many of the results

### Suppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions

Suppose.... Kant You are a good swimmer and one day at the beach you notice someone who is drowning offshore. Consider the following three scenarios. Which one would Kant says exhibits a good will? Even

### CRITICAL THINKING. Critical thinking is "reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do." (Ennis (1985)

CRITICAL THINKING Critical thinking is "reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do." (Ennis (1985) Critical thinking is "the art of thinking about your thinking while you are thinking in

### PHILOSOPHER S TOOL KIT 1. ARGUMENTS PROFESSOR JULIE YOO 1.1 DEDUCTIVE VS INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

PHILOSOPHER S TOOL KIT PROFESSOR JULIE YOO 1. Arguments 1.1 Deductive vs Induction Arguments 1.2 Common Deductive Argument Forms 1.3 Common Inductive Argument Forms 1.4 Deduction: Validity and Soundness

### Introductory Matters

1 Introductory Matters The readings in this section take up some topics that set the stage for discussion to follow. The first addresses the value of philosophy, the second the nature of truth, and the

### The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.

### What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing Logical relations Deductive logic Claims to provide conclusive support for the truth of a conclusion Inductive

Thanks for downloading this sample packet! We are glad that you have downloaded this sample product to review. We want you to be able to fully evaluate our products, so that you can purchase with confidence,

### The Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel s Idealism

The Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel s Idealism What is a great mistake? Nietzsche once said that a great error is worth more than a multitude of trivial truths. A truly great mistake

### Matthews Key for Informal Logic Exercises 1. Use these answers to grade and correct your homework assignment. A perfect score would be 100.

Matthews Key for Informal Logic Exercises 1 Use these answers to grade and correct your homework assignment. A perfect score would be 100. Please submit your exercises, marked up with totals for each section,

### complete state of affairs and an infinite set of events in one go. Imagine the following scenarios:

-1- -2- EPISTEMOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY 3. We are in a physics laboratory and make the observation that all objects fall at a uniform Can we solve the problem of induction, and if not, to what extent is it

### Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey Counter-Argument When you write an academic essay, you make an argument: you propose a thesis

### Introduction to the Study of Fallaciousness

CHAPTER 1 Introduction to the Study of Fallaciousness 1 Strong and Weak Arguments Arguments have a range of types and employ a diversity of devices, from those that press a historical case using causal

### Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

Unit 8 Categorical yllogism What is a syllogism? Inference or reasoning is the process of passing from one or more propositions to another with some justification. This inference when expressed in language

### Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy

Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy By Timo Schmitz, Philosopher As argumentative analogy or simply analogism (ἀναλογισµός), one calls the comparison through inductive reasoning of at least