MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, Maryam Yusuf, Nancy Madsen, and Mark Randall

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, Maryam Yusuf, Nancy Madsen, and Mark Randall"

Transcription

1 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 16, 2017 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, Maryam Yusuf, Nancy Madsen, and Mark Randall MEMBERS ABSENT: Steve Weick STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Jon Gilbert Steve F. Jayne J.P. Meyer Zhexin Zhang Brian Oman Kevin Vetsch Don Ketchum Joe Shamla 1641 Jeurissen Lane 9440 River Rock Drive South 1455 Bethesda Circle 9081 River Rock Drive 9310 River Rock Drive North 9456 River Rock Drive South 1691 Mayapple Pass PUBLIC HEARING: AVIENDA PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) REZONING FOR A REGIONAL DESTINATION, LIFESTYLE AND MIXED USE CENTER (AVIENDA) ON FIVE PARCELS TOTALING 118 ACRES ON PROPERTY ZONED AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT (A-2) WITH A LAND USE DESIGNATION OF REGIONAL COMMERCIAL OR OFFICE USE, AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LYMAN AND POWERS BOULEVARDS. THE CONCEPT PLAN INCLUDES RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, HOTEL AND OFFICE USES. APPLICANT: LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC. OWNER: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT. Aller: Tonight is a little bit different. We have a public comments presentation. We re going to continue the matter for appropriate action on the wetland alteration permit and conditional use permit and variances so that they can be properly noticed and that hearing will be June 6 th so again if you re at home or in the audience and you d like to come back for that hearing, that would be the time that we ll take appropriate action and then the City Council date at this point in time for it to move forward would be June 26, 2017 so again if you want to follow this item to

2 further action with the City Council please calendar your date for June 26, With that we ll go ahead with item one on our agenda which is Avienda. Aanenson: Thank you Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. As you stated this item will have a second meeting on June 6 th. Not all the items requested were noticed in the hearing. We want to make sure that those are properly noticed. It also gives us some additional time to take the comments tonight and work on some refinements so we re hoping that on this review that we get some good direction from the Planning Commission and continue to refine this project. In your packet there was a lot of information so this is the applicant s desires for some of it. Our job, the commission and the City Council then is to put that in, you know construct a PUD ordinance and design standards so that s what you have in front of you. Our version of that plus all their supplementary information so it s just translating what their goals and objectives are and then turning that into an ordinance format which is how we would implement the strategies. I also wanted to let you know that Jon Horn is with us tonight with Kimley-Horn who also worked on the AUAR for traffic questions. We know that s one of the issues for the neighbor so Jon will be going through that when we get to that point tonight. So as you stated we re here tonight to talk about the preliminary plat and we ll take comments on anything but we ll re-notice it so all comments can be continued into the next meeting. So again this is not just for the people here but anybody watching at home or want to review this at a later date where we are in the project. It s located in the southwest corner of Powers Boulevard and Lyman. It s not Highway 101. The parcels in the development, there s 7 of them and the total acreage is, we have a gross of 118. I think the applicant has a gross of, acres of approximately 115. There s one anomaly and that s the little piece on the other side of Powers Boulevard. So the background of this, again the City Council recently reviewed the final resolution and adoption of the AUAR but prior to that on November 1 st the Planning Commission did review, recommend conceptual approval of this project. Again conceptual approval has no legal standing but the intent of that is to give clear direction for the developer to continue to work on the project. On November 28 th the City Council also gave conceptual approval. So back in February 27 th we had a work session with the City Council to review some of the findings of the AUAR and then on February 28 th, excuse me on the 28 th meeting at the City Council they also directed the, ordered the review of the AUAR update. So we reviewed it with the City Council and then had an open house on February 28 th. That was well attended. A lot of questions were asked there and the applicant and staff, the consultants that were working on the AUAR were there to answer questions and then on March 7 th we had a public hearing to review the AUAR document. Again a public hearing wasn t required, or public notice wasn t required but we did do that to make sure that all issues were addressed so then on March 13 th the City Council authorized publication and we took a comment period. As a part of that comment period all the comments received were then addressed and formulated a mitigation plan. That mitigation plan is also a part of your report. What that mitigation plan says is that we will follow the City ordinances and I ll go through that in a little bit more detail when we get to it but so they did adopt a final resolution on May 8 th and the mitigation plan so that s what the applicant will then be directed to follow, or any project within this AUAR. It will be required to follow. Are there any questions on that so far? 2

3 Aller: No, thank you. Aanenson: Okay, so summary of the request. So we re looking at the rezoning to PUD, which is regional commercial. Again this was dual guided. This applicant is pursuing the regional commercial which includes PUD design standards. With that is a preliminary plat, a wetland alteration permit. That was the one that was not noticed. A conditional use for permit, for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Again that one s getting noticed for the 6 th and then variance for construction within the Bluff Creek Overlay. Again those 3 bottom ones are the ones that will be noticed for next time but you re certainly welcomed to comment on those but we ll make sure that we reiterate that at our next meeting. So again the goal tonight is to review the issues. Hear from the neighbors and take public comment and then also to hear from you. Concerns or issues you want us to come back and address or concerns to make sure as we re working to get this ordinance put together it reflects what you want the council to review. Your recommendation. So first we have the preliminary plat. So the preliminary plat that they are requesting, this is a little bit backwards in your staff report and I m going to go through the traffic because I think that kind of seems like it s got the most concern for the neighbors. So this is the plat. So this would be Lyman Boulevard on the north. This is Powers Boulevard. This is Bluff Creek Drive coming through and then the Mills Drive and then the extension of Sunrise Trail. So the original PUD always recommended that Bluff Creek Drive be connected. It also we had required that there be a connection at Mills Drive. You ll see when we go through the development itself we d always encourage that there d be some residential as a transition on that western side of the property. Also this was part of, also another access off of Lyman Boulevard and that would form a T intersection at Sunrise Trail. Sunset Trail. And so the other one was that connection from the south and we ll go through a little bit more detail on that but I m going to turn it over to Jon to kind of go through some of the traffic issues. Jon Horn: Good evening Chair, members of the Planning Commission. As Kate had suggested we did hear a lot of comments and questions about traffic so we thought it d be helpful this evening to provide you with a brief overview of the traffic analysis that was done as a part of the AUAR process so I ll just walk you through that very quickly. The Avienda area is basically this area on the exhibit so the northeasterly quadrant of the area that was analyzed as a part of the AUAR. Kate had discussed the extension of Bluff Creek Boulevard at this location as well as an extension to the north to Lyman Boulevard. Again as a part of the AUAR process we looked at the entire area but really tonight we re only focusing on the Avienda area. So as a part of the traffic analysis we did look at existing traffic volumes on all the surrounding roadways as well as the roadways internal to the development area. The numbers that are shown on this graphic are two directional daily traffic volumes so basically on Lyman Boulevard this 9,700 cars suggests that there s 9,700 cars today that travel in two directions on that piece of Lyman Boulevard. I did also want to call attention to Bluff Creek Boulevard and Bluff Creek Drive. So existing traffic volumes on Bluff Creek Boulevard just to the east of Audubon Road is 2,200 cars a day. As you extend further to the east it s about 1,600 cars per day and then traffic volumes on Bluff Creek Drive just north of Pioneer Trail start at 2,900 cars a day and transition to 2,500 cars a day 3

4 so that s based upon existing traffic counts. Existing conditions today. We did look at the proposed development concept and what would happen in year 2022 with full development of the site so basically all the numbers suggest what those anticipated traffic volumes would be based upon the traffic modeling that was done. Again focusing on the internal roadways which have gotten a lot of concern and questions by the residents in terms of how those volumes have changed so if you recall from the existing conditions it was 2,200 cars a day. Suggested to go up to 3,600 cars a day with full development on Bluff Creek Boulevard and then 3,000 at this location. Existing conditions is 1,600. And then on Bluff Creek Drive 2,900 and 2,500 so 2,900 goes to 4,200. 2,500 goes to 2,700. The 4,200 number is fairly large just because the access for this development area is proposed to come off of Bluff Creek Drive at this location. So again anticipated traffic volumes based upon 2022 and full development. As a reference point it s also important to consider the original AUAR that was done so back in 2003 the AUAR looked at the extension of a roadway between Audubon Road and Powers Boulevard on Bluff Creek Boulevard. As a part of that original AUAR process there was a lot of concern about cut through traffic and the design of that roadway so the roadway that was ultimately designed and constructed does include a roundabout at this location and the alignment was more circuitous and some traffic calming measures were addressed as a part of the original construction of that roadway to address some of those concerns about cut through traffic. And just for reference the 2010 anticipated traffic volumes along Bluff Creek Boulevard from that original AUAR, this 3,600 cars a day was anticipated to be 4,500 cars a day. The 3,000 was anticipated to be 8,400 and on Bluff Creek Drive the 2,700 was anticipated to be 3,100 cars a day so the traffic volumes that were originally anticipated in the AUAR for 2010 are less than what s currently anticipated for 2022 based upon the development and again a lot of that is from the background of you know trying to do some things with Bluff Creek Boulevard to minimize the amount of cut through traffic that occurs between Powers Boulevard Audubon Road. In terms of the improvements that would occur as a part of the development of the Avienda site, so again the Avienda site is right here. We are showing in the development of a fourth leg on the intersection at Powers and Bluff Creek Boulevard. Suggesting there ll be two left hand turn lanes. That has actually been a topic of conversation with the developer. Powers Boulevard today is built for double left turn lanes and we re proposing those double left turn lanes remain. It also shows as the proposed geometrics for the intersections, approaching that intersection. Powers Boulevard is a Carver County roadway so any improvements to Powers Boulevard need to be done in conjunction with Carver County and MnDOT has some jurisdiction as well as a result of the ramps from Highway 212 so both those agencies need to be heavily engaged in any conversations about modifications or improvements to this intersection. The Avienda development also proposes a connection to the north of Lyman Boulevard at Sunset Trail and the traffic analysis suggests that at some point a traffic signal could be warranted at that intersection so it s anticipated at some point a traffic signal would need to be installed at that location. So just some background. Aller: Can I ask a quick question on the traffic signal. Do we have control over that or is that something that s mandated by the State when they come in and do their numbers? 4

5 Jon Horn: It s basically so Lyman Boulevard is a county roadway so anything that s done there would have to be, you know you d have to engage Carver County but then ultimately this traffic signal warrants would have to be met and is between the City and the County at that point to decide whether that traffic signal goes in. Aller: Thank you. Jon Horn: So just a summary. The AUAR update identified that on Bluff Creek Boulevard the traffic that would be anticipated in 2022 upon full buildout is less than the analysis that was done as a part of the original 2005 MUSA area. Bluff Creek Boulevard design is proposed to include a couple of roundabouts as well as some traffic calming measures. Another thing to mention is that the anticipated speed limit that s for Bluff Creek Boulevard is proposed to be 30 miles an hour so again another way to try to decrease traffic volumes and to try to slow traffic down through the area. And as well the traffic signal that would likely be warranted at Lyman Boulevard and Sunset Trail intersection. Aanenson: So I would like to move now to the development data itself looking at the project. As I mentioned there s a preliminary plat so there s 17 lots and 3 outlots. One of the outlots would be a drainage and utility for this lot here. This, when Powers Boulevard was constructed it severed this remnant parcel here. Then we have the Bluff Creek Overlay District and then the existing pond over here so those would be the 3 outlots. So when the PUD was put into place, when the City had desired to look at a regional commercial. The challenge that we had from the beginning of this project is looking at how the market change and what becomes a regional draw. What does that marketplace look like today because the intent of the original PUD was to look at a couple of major anchor tenants and we were challenged with the developer to find out you know what does that mean in today s market so they updated their market study and that was one of your attachments here. The McComb s study and just wanted to talk a little bit about what the planning staff s perception of that, of what our vision was and then how the market forces have changed and how they re trying to match those two goals or two desires up. So the planning department when we looked at it we saw this as a place for you know entertainment. Department stores. Comparison shopping. Specialty, restaurants, hotels and residential. 20 percent residential and then again you know it would be a gathering place. Different than the downtown which kind of serves the daily needs. You come and get your mail. You know grocery stores. Those sort of things, which would be restaurants and more regional draw. So because it did have two major anchor tenants we challenged the developer to explain to us what the mix of uses was or what the intensity or the draw by the commercial mix. The uses that were in there that would create the regional draw. Hence the McComb s study. So what the study looked at, and I didn t put a slide in there. It s in the staff report but what they did is they looked at a comparison of a number of other regional shopping centers and I think it s interesting to note that this site right here with the building square footage at a 1,115,000 is significantly larger than the ones in the study itself so they looked at Galleria. Shops at Arbor Lake. Woodbury. Shops at West End. Central Park Commons and City Place and tried to look at the, what were some of the commonalities in those so all of those did have food stores which is one of the things that they 5

6 wanted to put in. We had that discussion early on. That would be one of what they would consider one of the draws that brings people to that center so with that we also wanted to make sure that there was enough massing of other specialty boutique retail that would also be a draw. So if it s not a large department store that there would be quantities of scale that would draw that so they also looked at some of the other things they had in common. Specialty apparel, those sort of things which is what our goal would be too. So if you look at the grocer on this side, some of the more traditional and then the specialty retail in the core. So again this project is significantly larger than the projects that were studied so I think that adds a little bit more complexity to making sure that we put, you know we construct the PUD and put those uses in there because that was our challenge looking at this is making sure that there s some built in flexibility but also that we ve constructed one that we think reflects what the marketplace is and we also have control. That s why we put it into a PUD with the regional commercial. We wanted to direct that. Be more prescriptive of the uses that go in there. Having said that, as you know with Villages on the Pond things change over time and so we know that there s a use that comes in and we hadn t anticipated and it seems to make a lot of sense that we would process it through and it would have to come through for a PUD amendment but right now we re trying to put together that list of uses that seem to make sense for both parties in trying to achieve the goals that were originally set out in the PUD itself. So again the mix of uses is what the developer is also accomplishing so you ve got the restaurants. The office park and then the specialty retail more in the center and then the housing on the eastern edge which is what we had suggested also to, excuse me the western side to provide that buffer from the existing neighborhoods. So this is another illustrative way to show, we put the square footage in here and also you know what we originally put in the PUD was a maximum of 20 percent area amount of residential so that number at 16 units an acre would top out at 370 and looking at what they re proposing it s 515 so that would be a way then, if the council, or the Planning Commission felt that that would be a way to, that they felt that s good direction then the PUD would be amended to make it you know 25 percent, whatever that number comes out to. That s the housing but there s some other issues on some of the housing that we ll discuss. Also we put in the staff report, I m going to go back to this in the staff report regarding the Bluff Creek and the overlay district. The senior housing and that senior housing is shown right now as what we would call service enriched so we put the Carver County study in there that they had done and they re in the middle of updating that right now to say within the cities within Carver County, what they see as the needs are and they break it down in that report. It s one of your attachments that show what the cities need over time. Carver County and, excuse me. City of Chanhassen, Chaska and Waconia obviously tend to get the bulk of those service enriched products so the council just approved the Mission Hills which was modified. You saw that project to add the daycare so that was just approved on Monday night and that will be under construction. We also have Presbyterian Homes. There are demands for senior housing. We re just saying service enriched right now is not one of them. We ve recently approved 2 group home ones. The Beehive, Olive Wood so those are also picking up that share of kind of the service enriched so while we certainly think there s some demand for senior coop, senior rental, senior condo, the service enriched would not be our recommendation to the City Council so that was this project over in that area and that also had quite a few units in it too. So we did try to just show you again the floor area ratio. Looking at 6

7 that. Does that tie in with what we use typically for density to make sure it all tied back to what our original goals were, except for the density issue so there s two ways to resolve that. Reduce the number of units or in the PUD change that percentage so that s something that you should give some consideration or take some comments from the residents as far as housing as a component. I think, sorry to keep going back and forth but one of the projects that they entered which I think is unique which we re excited about is this housing in the core and I ll let them talk a little bit more about that. The rental housing with commercial attached to it which we think is a different product which is what we re always looking for in a development is something new in the marketplace for choice so we think that s an existing product and that s right in kind of the village center there. So again we show the acreage. Total acreage checking out the outlot for the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The piece that will be in the drainage and utility easement and then Outlot C, that wetland that goes between the two. So just on the wetland itself I just wanted to comment on that because this is one that we ll have discussion more on in the next meeting. This is going through the wetland alteration permit so the goal for the developer is to pursue that in order to get the project approved they would have to get this alteration permit approved as it is so there has been a complete application made. It has been reviewed by the Army Corps. I m not going to go into a lot of detail on it but I will say that we re using a consultant to work through the process and that they have completed that application and the deadline expires by July 12 th. They re working on the permitting that the Army Corps, some additional information that they did meet but I did want to add too on the Bluff Creek Overlay District. That s one of the tradeoff s that they re making for the filling of the wetlands so all the wetlands would be affected except for the two that are in the Bluff Creek Overlay District and then the existing one that ties into the neighborhood to the west. So the Bluff Creek Overlay District I ll show here in a minute. So this is where that Overlay District falls. One of the things for the mitigation strategies was that the City follow it s ordinances. We have preserved along the wetland. There s been minor grading within the wetland so if this project was to go forward the senior housing as shown where it is, that s where the conditional use and the variance would be because we ve never had somebody build inside or remove the Bluff Creek. It s approximately 5 acres so that building, that senior housing, if you can see here, plops kind of into that 5 acres there and also the parking for the other project so you can see the length of the Bluff Creek district itself. So the Bluff Creek Overlay District was adopted in When that was put in place. There was a couple different strategies of how to acquire that property. One was to actually to go through the entire length of the city and try to acquire that or incrementally as each of the projects come in to pursue doing a tradeoff. In this case because they re doing a PUD, they re filling some significant wetlands, it seems like that would be the appropriate tradeoff so there are ways if you were to do minor grading or there were some empirical reasons to say that it doesn t meet the criteria. Scientific evidence but because of the significant trees in that area, the high quality of trees we believe that it should be preserved. That area. The park commission also commented on that and gave the same comment so we d like to see that all, little alteration to that, the Overlay District in and of itself. Again that was part of the AUAR strategies also. So there is setbacks from the primary zone so even if you re grading in that, the zone. There s a setback from that. You d have to get a conditional use so looking at where those final plans end up we would look at that. To be, as part of this you know we re talking about just setting the 7

8 framework. We re not approving any buildings right now but we re trying to establish how things would look so when they come in there s no surprises for the developer too so even though we re setting up the ordinance as they would come in, each site has to come in and go through site plan which would require a public hearing before the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. So any site plan that would come in but what we re establishing is the rules by which they ll be measured when they come in so it s important if there s issues our frameworks are important. That we make sure that those are part of the rules that they would have to follow, if that makes sense. So grading and stormwater. Did you want to take a shot at that Alyson? Fauske: Thanks Kate. The developer proposes grading the site to accommodate their development there. They submitted some stormwater calculations to meet the water quality, quantity and the rate control for the site. We ve had some discussions. We have a consultant that is looking and reviewing those documents. We ve had some conversations with the applicant to get the necessary information in order to complete the review. I ll let the applicant speak specifically to what their plan is but generally speaking they re looking at, they would like to do a re-use project on this site so I ll let them address that when their presentation comes up. In addition to the grading, because leading into existing grades and getting the site prepared for the building pads that they ve requested they did see, anticipate some retaining walls on the site. There are 4 of them outlined in the staff report and for those following along at home I m on page 24. Wall A is on the west side of Sunset Trail. It s a shorter wall. Approximately let s see 300 feet long and at the maximum height 20 feet. And then of course there s a second wall here on the south side of Lyman Boulevard, Wall B. And that one would be a maximum height of approximately 15 feet. Then skipping over to the southern portion of the site the developer anticipates a wall here along a wetland as Kate had outlined in the, in her staff report. Or pardon me on her slide that shows the wetland at this location so you d have a retaining wall wrap around there along the southern portion of the site. That one s a fairly long wall, 980 feet. Pardon me Wall D. Thank you. 980 feet. 15 feet high. And then there s another wall, the notation s missing. Right up here at the northern portion just around the stormwater feature here and that one is 4 feet tall so shorter wall at that location. The utility plan was also included with the application. The watermain would be looped throughout the site providing an extension here through Mills Lane. Another connection currently shown here at Powers. We re still having a discussion on the appropriate location for that but essentially looping the watermain through the site. Additionally there would be an extension of the sanitary sewer from the existing terminus here within Bluff Creek Boulevard. The permit process for this area, it included an analysis of the elevations through here so that s a fairly deep sanitary sewer at that location as it was anticipated to need that, require that depth in order to service this area with gravity sanitary sewer. And then there would also be an extension here at Mills Drive to service these residential components of the site. Aanenson: Thank you Alyson. I m just going to go back. One of the issues that we talked about the extension of Mills Drive. That was always included when this subdivision went in that we d want a secondary access out to serve that local traffic. We also requested that the application 8

9 look at housing as a transition. What they re showing there we think makes a lot of sense. It s a great buffer for that neighborhood. The other issue was the connection down at Camden Ridge, to tie that so this is actually a fire lane. I know the fire department feels strongly about it. It does create a lot of impact through the site for grading. Originally the intent was to run it this way but there s that large retaining wall that the Assistant City Engineer just went through. It s a pretty substantial wall so that forces this so that s you know, that s a sensitive issue we know for the connection there so we re still working through that issue. The developer, I put together a district master plan which we like for, I think for to help understand how the project is being put together and they ve broken it down into the retail hospitality district, and that would be where the hotel would be. Where the grocery store would be and so potentially some drive thru applications in that area. And then also we ve got the multi-family housing district. The low density district. The office district and that district also included daycare. And then the village district which is the kind of the specialty retail and then the more urban apartments attached with retail. So what we suggested, and so now I m kind of moving onto the design guidelines and that actually becomes the ordinance for this. We ve referenced what the intent of this document is. The permitted uses so what we did is took the applicant s narrative and pulled it in and then made some comments and so we ll be working through. We want your input and the residents input and then working through with the applicant to fine tune this but we want to make sure that there s one grocer. One large grocer in there and some of the other ones, uses that would be ancillary. One daycare. Again if you go back to our original goals that we re doing things that are different than downtown that would be more regional comparison shopping and then as I mentioned earlier the 20 percent housing. Your comment on that because that would only allow up to 370 units at the 20 percent 16 units an acre so with the, if you felt strongly one way or the other then we would adjust that PUD to make that work. And then again as I stated we took out the housing that was more what we would call service enriched memory care, or skilled nursing requirement. There are also some other minor tweaks in there. So one of the issues that we had is there s architecture based on the different uses in that and they ve got a document in there that shows kind of the architecture. We want that translated in a more specific prescriptive types of materials. Percentage of materials which we have in our current ordinance so again willing to work with the applicant on that. We want to have that developed for you and hear some comments on that more specific on, they ve listed materials but we want to know what percentage of materials. Like we don t allow a large percent of concrete. Masonry units or cut faced block. Those would be percentage or same with EIFS so we want to do that. We ve also added some, we ve learned from some of our drive thru s that we need better stacking on some of those so we ve given some standards from our consultant for those uses. Again one of the other issues that they were looking at, and because we don t know who the users are and we have to, things change over time. The same with the Villages on the Pond. Things change over time. Want some relief on some of the parking because we don t have a parking study. We re looking at each use individually. We certainly anticipate there ll be cross access parking between the uses. We support that. That does allow flexibility and we can put that in place but we don t want to give too much up front where we have problems down the road when we re looking at these uses so I think we just need to work with the developer a little bit more on that because they re asking for relief for commercial districts and some of the apartments where you re 9

10 parking in the commercial. We certainly have that in the downtown where we have the park and ride ramp but there s not that big overflow space in this area so we want to make sure that we re recommending right now we just stick with the current city standards. And then also the overall landscaping plan and theme. The City Forester gave some comments on that. Wants to see that more developed again because as each project would come in and then they would meet that criteria. Fulfill it. Continuation of that theme which is, which they have spelled out. The developer what their overall architectural theme is which in the pictures looks great but we need it more in a narrative to apply to any developer and it appears like they re also going to have a architectural review but we also need that in the ordinance because that can change over time too. Signage. We also looked at their signage package that s in here. Just a few changes. We like the themes. I think one of the concerns we have was a lot of the signs that were placed on the large retaining wall we think certainly a sign that says the name of project, Avienda makes sense. We also think some of the tenant signs work and maybe in the village more that we would have projecting signs. Something unique on that so we have some comments on that but I think we re not that far off from what they re recommending. Just some minor tweaks on that and then looking at the, at the wall area because we have that percentage too so, so these are the three kind of areas. There s some way finding things that we think make sense. Again some of the ones where we have a major entrance sign here, I m not sure going that way. And then these would be signs that are all on top of the retaining wall. Certainly the one for Avienda but the way finding signs, or just the advertising sign that that s being that distance away seems a little excessive. And then did put some prohibitive things in there too but I think those are all doable. I hope you ve had a chance to look at those but we d be happy to get some direction from you on that. With that I ll just kind of say kind of the direction we re going down. I know the applicant wants to make their presentation but this is kind of how we see that we d like comments on the plat itself. The layout. The grading. Wetlands. Bluff Creek Overlay District. Stormwater and then the PUD. The design standards. You know what did we miss? What concerns you have and we ll look at that but with that I ll be happy to answer any questions. Otherwise I ll turn it over to the applicant to make their presentation. Aller: Any questions at this point in time from any of the commissioners? Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: Kate I have a question on the prohibited uses. Is a big box discount sort of a store a prohibited use? Aanenson: Yeah. Madsen: I did not, is that go under the club warehouse including wholesale category? Aanenson: Yes. Yeah, yeah. So what we did is we put that under the, you know we talked about that with the applicant and I think that s something that we re still working on. You know you can have a small furniture store. You could have a very large furniture store. They may not intend to do that but you know in the years down the road depending on where things are in the 10

11 project if they get a user so we want to revisit that and maybe fine tune that one but did you have a question on making sure it s in there or that we missed it or? Madsen: Just with the visioning process that the City went through I thought that a big box discount sort of a chain store would be a prohibited use. Aanenson: Correct. Correct. I think the way we put it on there, we addressed it and talked about, so if you look at home furniture stores under retail establishments, it s on the second page of the Exhibit A. So you have the top is entertainment. Number 2 is retail establishment. E is home furniture stores so we ve put not to exceed 50 feet but we think we just need to work on that a little bit more. Madsen: That by limiting the size. Aanenson: Correct, that was our intent. It s not prohibiting but it s limiting the size. Madsen: Okay. Aanenson: Because there might be, there might be a specialty retail. A Pottery Barn or something that you want to have there but you don t want to have a large one so it s just trying to figure out what that, working with the applicant or hearing from residents what that square footage should be. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Aller: And my understand and maybe anyone can answer this is that that big box in the industry right now is it about 40,000 square feet? Before it s determined to be a big box. So do we know what that would actually be? Aanenson: Okay, we can check. Aller: Any other questions at this point? Tietz: Andrew yeah. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Kate I just want to follow up on the McComb s study. Was there any, the most recent study appeared to have focused primarily on lifestyle centers and really look at the demographics of the area and the buying power of the area. And presumably it s going to come mostly from the southwest as opposed from Eden Prairie coming out this way. But also I guess I m concerned about the marketability of the office spaces proposed and housing and the different 11

12 types, you know focus on the retail but how about those other proposed uses, will there be a follow up study? Do you anticipate getting any more information on that? Aanenson: That s a good question. I ll let the applicant address that. I know they re doing some additional information also for the Army Corps. A little bit different, or some additives on that so maybe we could ask them that question. Tietz: Okay, thanks Kate. Aller: Anything additional? Hearing none we ll ask the applicant to come forward and I ll go ahead and address the issue right away and ask that as you do your presentation if you re going to obtain additional information and provide to us any additional studies, it d be great if you d just let us know during the presentation. Thank you. Mark Norland: Thank you Kate. Mr. Chairman and commissioners. That was very thorough so I think a lot of what we had prepared we can kind of skip through and hit on some of the issues but first I just want to introduce myself. My name is Mark Nordland with Launch Properties. We are the developer on the project on behalf of the owner which is Level 7 and go through the team a little bit. Level 7 Development is the owner of the property. The primary investor there is Bahram Akradi. The CEO and founder of Life Time Fitness. That s myself of course, Mark Nordland with Launch Properties developing it. Tom Palmquist at Colliers is doing the listing and dealing with prospects and getting everybody lined up for the project. Jeff Hysjulien with RSP Architects is here and can answer some questions and has been doing our primary design work. And then Darren Lazan and his staff at Landform have been doing the bulk of the civil engineering and putting together the application so Darren will do the bulk of our presentation here tonight but Darren, myself and Jeff are all here to answer any questions and walk through things. Brief history, Kate you hit on all these dates in more detail than I am but you know we got the concept approval in, right after Thanksgiving time here in November. Now I ve been working actually in great concert with the staff here and the neighborhood. We had our, I don t know is it our sixth neighborhood meeting maybe last week. The crowds have been getting smaller. The questions have been answered but we still get great feedback especially now that we ve got an actual proposal. You know it s all been conceptual. There was a conceptual approval that, yeah concept approval that went through in That was a different piece of property a little bit. Part of this property and a different ownership group and a different structure. You know we ve been restarting this process under new ownership and with the entire site here this year and have been continually taking on feedback from the neighborhood and from staff and of course through that concept process and will still, we just got the staff report because it was a bulky staff report. It was great work to get that out Kate on Monday and there s several of these items that I think that we ve got a meeting scheduled on Friday with staff to walk through the granular on some of these things but hopefully we can hit on more of the high points today and then another Planning Commission in, is it June 6 th and then the 26 th for City Council and as Kate mentioned a totally separate track but related is the Army Corps of Engineers and then our wetland permitting here which are major milestones. Ideally we will get all those 12

13 approvals some time this construction season and be able to start grading the site yet this fall. That s our goal and our plan, although we ve got you know a lot to do between now and then and we re hoping to be able to hit that. We wouldn t go vertical with buildings until next spring based on that schedule. With that I m going to let Darren start to go through the presentation itself and we ll be here for any questions. Aller: Thank you. Darren Lazan: Nice job. Mr. Chair, members of the commission, my name Darren Lazan with Landform Professional Services and I will represent Level 7, the applicant on the item before you tonight. Continuing on from the high points that Mark went through we wanted to talk a little bit about the existing conditions on the site. Kate did this in a fair amount of detail so I won t spend a ton of time on that. The site is roughly 118 acres. It s separated into two parcels. The second orphaned piece on the east side of Powers is not shown on this exhibit but we really started the process with a handful of control or constraints on this site in that we have a known point here that really can t move. It needs to align with the intersection to the north. We have a signalized intersection on, that was the end of that battery. Signalized intersection on Powers coming off the MnDOT exit ramp. We have a potential connection which now we know is a confirmed connection on Mills going across to the other side. Connection to Bluff Creek Boulevard at the southwest corner. We have the Bluff Creek Overlay District and bluff components that are in the southeast corner as well and then we have a number of wetlands predominantly wetlands 1 and 2 identified in the report is that major complex in the center of the site so that s where we started looking at the site. What fits on the site. How do we move forward? Those are kind of just the constraints in the site overview that we worked with. As Kate hit on we had a number of different iterations of this site plan but where we ve landed today is a plan that really focuses on districts so the village in the center is the one that is probably the toughest to do. The highest quality architecture. Landscape architecture. Kind of the shops and the key components that were probably most desired in the intended guiding for this project and the perimeter in general supports those. A lot of thought was given through the inception of this plan as to how do we make these retail uses viable in today s market and as you see in the news and hear all the time chains are closing. Retailers are closing. Re-crafting the way they do business. It s a real challenge to figure out how we go about that and the goals we set forward was to create this synergy of uses to support that highest quality component in the village and then add components that are more experiential. Makes you want to stay for a period of time. Enjoy the space. Move from one shop to the next and so forth. Kind of the traditional components of lifestyle centers in the past but it s just tougher to do that now. And the way we approach that is to combine these surrounding districts where we have the retail and hospitality folks that make daily retail trips are now in the center and supporting those uses in the middle. Hospitality or hotel uses that are there overnight tend to use restaurants and coffee shops in the morning. Working around the corner to the multi-family residential on the perimeter, that is a life cycle component. Those folks are there in a lot of daytime hours to help support that lunch traffic. The low density residential again adds that night time, morning component but is also a buffer to the west but those are great trips to have. Walkable trips to have in your project. And 13

14 then around the north was predominantly office with a daycare use in there as well but that office adds those daytime lunch trips so it was really a thoughtful process of coming through. How do we support the higher quality component in the middle? The piece everybody wants in the middle and the answer was this synergy of these uses all feeding off of each other and creating vibrancy and viability in the center. Current plan that you ve seen on a number of slides now really reflects how that could lay out. We re getting a lot more detail from previous submittals where we may have had bubble diagrams and rough layouts. We started to actually put uses. Buildings. Parking. Access drives. Do roadway design is underway. We ve got a lot more specifics at this stage in the development and staff did a great job going through these components both engineering and planning so I won t take up much more of your time but Bluff Creek Boulevard was a very hot topic in all of our neighborhood meetings and past public hearings. I think we ve done a tremendous job at scoping and scaling that connection to provide the through fare that was needed for emergency vehicles, traveling public but using the roundabouts and some traffic calming in those areas to try to mitigate some of the speed or some of the nuisance components of traffic so that connection s made. We have an internal drive loop that connects to those two roundabouts and circles around the village. Provides access. Disperses those trips. Moves through. We made the connection to Mills on the west side, over here. Connection to Mills is there for that requirement in the city process and we have our Lyman and Powers connections as well. Sometimes it s hard at the scale of the overall project to take a look at this middle and the walkable components and the amenities that are in there so I wanted to just drill down a little bit to the spine that s created end to end starting on the east side with the two premiere restaurant pads where these would be the more upscale, finer dining components on a fairly large plaza and water feature connected through and across Avienda Parkway into the main street component or the village component. This is very classic replication of small downtowns where you have walkable sidewalks. Amenities in place. You have some parking on a limited basis. We always joke that with centers like these you don t need to park there. You just need to have the prospect of one day getting one of those parking stalls but they found in a lot of these centers if you have no parking the store fronts and store owners start to fail because people won t, they won t drive that traffic past their front door so we have angled parking on either side of that to provide that traffic through put and then crosswalks to provide for the safe pedestrian areas. We have fairly ample space between those, let s say those 6 buildings where we can do outdoor dining. Some amenity spaces. Shared facilities in there. So those have been provided for those small retailers and then as we move further west we have a couple of our larger plazas that are fronting, or they re on the end cap of those 6 small retail buildings and on the front plaza of the high amenity market rate apartment project which is the east end cap or the western end cap of that kind of spine. And we think that the housing component is a pretty significant piece. It anchors really those small retail shops very effectively adding those morning, evening bodies on the plaza and the trips in that area that otherwise may not be there so there s roughly units there. That s folks that are coming and going in the morning and at night. That adds a lot of vibrancy to that and we have some retail in that building as well on the ground floor so there s a retail and housing end cap on the west side of that spine. I think there s, as was pointed out earlier too there s a water feature around the roundabout that s kind of the entrance component. That s a landscape feature that will be 14

15 adjacent to the roundabout. But those are the pieces that kind of make up that walkable core high amenity, high landscape, high architecture piece that some of the, as Kate suggested some of the signage may change in there to be more appropriate to that village, you know this is that central component that we ve surrounded with the other uses. And then we have some imagery on here starting from the outside and working to the inside. This proposed streetscape character, this is along Bluff Creek Boulevard where some of the private sidewalks kind of depart from the public walk. Heavily landscaped. I think very walkable and very landscape rich I guess and that treatment in there again that adds to that calming along Bluff Creek if it s well landscaped both in the median and in the boulevard it tends to slow speeds down a little bit. This one s a trail connection potential off of the southern multi-family component where it would potentially go into Bluff Creek and make those connections so again you have some interpretative signage. Some amenities there. Benches and so forth and then a trail that could work through the bluff and provide access to residents and to folks that are visiting the center. This is the, one of the sample restaurant pads. An example of the architecture but more importantly the plaza space that s on the east side. Landscaping. Hard surfaces. Kind of that amenity rich plaza space that s around the restaurants. This going again to the street frontage in the main spine. Providing that pedestrian connection between the restaurants and the multi-family and all those shops inbetween. Some of the amenity space that could be between those buildings. We mentioned, these would be likely attached to the store owners for their dining and outdoor use as well. And then this is that larger plaza on the west side in front of the multi-family unit there where we have not only the dining for the adjacent retailers but some public space that could be programmed. More open space landscape components in there as well. I did want to back up. There were two comments that I didn t have in our brief overview and again the intent was to really kind of have a high level overview this week. Get your comments. Take notes. Work with staff over the coming weeks and then come back again with more detail at the June 6 th meeting but two items were questioned or talked about earlier that I wanted to go back to the site plan I guess and hit upon. Go back there real quick. Where the storm water and Assistant City Engineer recapped most of those components very well. She asked us to touch on the water reuse. We are contemplating, in order to further our treatment or get closer to our treatment requirements a water re-use system and it s pretty extensive. I don t know of any other one in the Twin Cities to the extent we re proposing right now. We re proposing to capture, distribute through a main throughout the entire project and re-use for all 100 percent of the irrigation requirements of this project. Re-use re-captured rain water. It would be on a system of pumps that provide pressure. The individual lots would then just use individual distribution systems and connect to the main. It s a purple line pipe type setup so that is a pretty significant piece as far as sustainability and storm water treatment so we hope to have more details on that at the June 6 th meeting. We ve had some schematic design exercises on that so far. We think it s coming along nicely but we haven t really documented that component yet but there s no doubt that that will be needed to treat storm water and we will be doing that component as part of this project. The second was the parking piece. We understand staff s concern with reductions at this stage of the project but I guess we d like to continue that discussion over the next 2 weeks because we think it s critical to the success of the overall that we lay those ground work, lay that ground work now just like the architecture and just like every other component so we can go out and market those 15

CITY OF BOISE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING

CITY OF BOISE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT Rich Demarest, Chair Milt Gillespie, Vice-Chair Stephen Bradbury Douglas Gibson Jennifer Stevens Tamara Ansotegui Garrett Richardson (Student) III. REGULAR AGENDA CPA15-00008

More information

Charlottesville Planning Commission Preliminary Hearing - Franklin LLC PUD Site Plan Monday, April 11, 2006

Charlottesville Planning Commission Preliminary Hearing - Franklin LLC PUD Site Plan Monday, April 11, 2006 Charlottesville Planning Commission Preliminary Hearing - Franklin LLC PUD Site Plan Monday, April 11, 2006 Transcription services generously donated by Willoughby Parks, Woolen Mills resident CPC Members:

More information

WHITE OAK BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES HELD JULY 2, 2009

WHITE OAK BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES HELD JULY 2, 2009 WHITE OAK BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES HELD JULY 2, 2009 Planning Commission Members Present: Al Lebedda Helen Stratigos Paul McCarthy Tony Villinger Glenn Beech Planning Commission Members

More information

OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD JUNE 12, 2014

OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD JUNE 12, 2014 OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD JUNE 12, 2014 Agenda MOPHIE, LLC -REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 37,000 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING

More information

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH P.O. BOX 898 WINDHAM, NH 03087

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH P.O. BOX 898 WINDHAM, NH 03087 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: MAY 20,

More information

PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS February 21, :00 p.m.

PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS February 21, :00 p.m. PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS February 21, 2013 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Duffer: Good evening, I will now call to order the Plainfield Board of Zoning Appeals for February 21, 2013. ROLL CALL/DETERMINE

More information

JANICE MENKING - Chair CHARLIE KIEHNE CHRIS KAISER STEVE THOMAS RON WOELLHOF JASON HELFRICH MATT LINES BJORN KIRCHDORFER

JANICE MENKING - Chair CHARLIE KIEHNE CHRIS KAISER STEVE THOMAS RON WOELLHOF JASON HELFRICH MATT LINES BJORN KIRCHDORFER STATE OF TEXAS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION COUNTY OF GILLESPIE December 7, 2011 CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG 5:30 P.M. On this the 7 th day of December, 2011, the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION convened in

More information

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T August 27, 2014 CASE NO: PROJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DETAILS: ZA14-023 Preliminary Plat for Silver Ridge Addition Phase III The applicant

More information

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE Zoning Board of Appeals October 17, 2018

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE Zoning Board of Appeals October 17, 2018 CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE Zoning Board of Appeals October 17, 2018 DATE: October 17, 2018 APPROVED: November 14, 2018 TIME: 7:00 P.M. PLACE: Northville Township Hall 44405 Six Mile Road CALL TO ORDER:

More information

Planning and Zoning Staff Report Corp. of Presiding Bishop LDS Church - PH

Planning and Zoning Staff Report Corp. of Presiding Bishop LDS Church - PH Planning and Zoning Staff Report Corp. of Presiding Bishop LDS Church - Hearing Date: February 1, 2018 Development Services Department Applicant/Property Owner: Corp of the Presiding Bishop LDS Church

More information

Allie Brooks Dwight Johnson Linda Borgman Doris Lockhart Karon Epps Jeffrey Tanner Ted Greene. Mark Fountain

Allie Brooks Dwight Johnson Linda Borgman Doris Lockhart Karon Epps Jeffrey Tanner Ted Greene. Mark Fountain Minutes Regular Meeting of the Florence County Planning Commission Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. County Complex, Room 803 180 N. Irby St., Florence, South Carolina 29501 The Florence County Planning

More information

City of Lilburn 76 Main Street Lilburn, GA City Council Meeting Agenda

City of Lilburn 76 Main Street Lilburn, GA City Council Meeting Agenda City of Lilburn 76 Main Street Lilburn, GA 30047 City Council Meeting Agenda Auditorium Monday, May 11, 2015 7:30 p.m. Council Johnny Crist, Mayor Teresa Czyz, Post 1 Scott Batterton, Post 2 Eddie Price,

More information

Efficient Existing Public Buildings { BP no. 1 }

Efficient Existing Public Buildings { BP no. 1 } City of Brooklyn Center Background Information County: Hennepin Population: 30,104 GreenStep City category: A Full-time equivalent city staff (approx.): 75 Participating township(s) / school district(s):

More information

Mayor Mussatto Thank you very much for that. Is there a presentation by staff? Mr. Wilkinson, are you doing a staff presentation?

Mayor Mussatto Thank you very much for that. Is there a presentation by staff? Mr. Wilkinson, are you doing a staff presentation? TRANSCRIPT OF THE PUBLIC MEETING HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY HALL, 141 WEST 14 th STREET, NORTH VANCOUVER, B.C., ON MONDAY, APRIL 16, 2012 AT 7:00 P.M. PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS Mayor D.R. Mussatto

More information

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cathy Wolfe District One Diane Oberquell District Two Robert N. Macleod District Three Creating Solutions for Our Future HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

More information

Chairman Sandora: Please stand for the Opening Ceremony, the Pledge of Allegiance.

Chairman Sandora: Please stand for the Opening Ceremony, the Pledge of Allegiance. The North Royalton Planning Commission met in the North Royalton Council Chambers, 13834 Ridge Road, on Wednesday, April 6, 2011, to hold a Public Hearing. Chairman Tony Sandora called the meeting to order

More information

BOONE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BOONE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOONE COUNTY FISCAL COURTROOM BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 9, :00 P.M.

BOONE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BOONE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOONE COUNTY FISCAL COURTROOM BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 9, :00 P.M. BOONE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BOONE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOONE COUNTY FISCAL COURTROOM BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 9, 2016 6:00 P.M. Mr. Whitton called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS

More information

URBANDALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES. June 27, 2016

URBANDALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES. June 27, 2016 URBANDALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES The Urbandale Planning and Zoning Commission met in regular session on Monday,, at the Urbandale City Hall, 3600 86 th Street. Chairperson Wayne Van Heuvelen

More information

MUNSTER PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING Meeting Date: June 13, 2017 Date of Approval:

MUNSTER PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING Meeting Date: June 13, 2017 Date of Approval: MUNSTER PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING Meeting Date: June 13, 2017 Date of Approval: Call to Order: A regular business meeting of the Munster Plan Commission was held in the Munster

More information

CITY OF THE DALLES PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES

CITY OF THE DALLES PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CITY OF THE DALLES PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Thursday, September 3, 2015 City Hall Council Chambers 313 Court Street The Dalles, OR 97058 Conducted in a handicap accessible room 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER

More information

Present: Tom Brahm Guests: Nathan Burgie

Present: Tom Brahm Guests: Nathan Burgie Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting March 21, 2011 DRAFT Present: Tom Brahm Guests: Nathan Burgie Tom Burgie Jack Centner Ken Hanvey, Chairman Brian Malotte Sandra Hulbert Mitch Makowski Joe Polimeni Scott

More information

MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, and Mark Randall. STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director

MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, and Mark Randall. STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 5, 2017 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, and Mark Randall MEMBERS

More information

City of Ely. Background Information. GreenStep Coordinator. County: St. Louis. Population: 3,460. GreenStep City category: B

City of Ely. Background Information. GreenStep Coordinator. County: St. Louis. Population: 3,460. GreenStep City category: B City of Ely Background Information County: St. Louis Population: 3,460 GreenStep City category: B Full-time equivalent city staff (approx.): 38 Participating township(s) / school district(s): GreenStep

More information

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting August 19, 2009 The Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) of the City of Titusville, Florida met for a regular session in the Council Chamber of City Hall,

More information

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF NEW LENOX PLAN COMMISSION. Held in the New Lenox Village Hall, 1 Veterans Parkway

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF NEW LENOX PLAN COMMISSION. Held in the New Lenox Village Hall, 1 Veterans Parkway CALL TO ORDER MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF NEW LENOX PLAN COMMISSION Held in the New Lenox Village Hall, 1 Veterans Parkway Tuesday, June 16, 2015 7:00 p.m. #15 6 B A regular meeting

More information

OAK RIDGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, :00 P.M. OAK RIDGE TOWN HALL

OAK RIDGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, :00 P.M. OAK RIDGE TOWN HALL OAK RIDGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 7:00 P.M. OAK RIDGE TOWN HALL MINUTES Members Present Ron Simpson, Chair Bobbi Baker, Vice Chair Nancy Stoudemire Steve Wilson Larry Stafford

More information

May 2, Chairman Ken Dull, Vice Chairman Jim Smith, Susan Snider, Vivian Zeke Partin, Janice Clark, David Culp, Jeff DeGroote

May 2, Chairman Ken Dull, Vice Chairman Jim Smith, Susan Snider, Vivian Zeke Partin, Janice Clark, David Culp, Jeff DeGroote WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 321 Causeway Drive, Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480 May 2, 2017 The Town of Wrightsville Beach Planning Board met at 6:00 p.m. in the Town Hall Council Chambers located

More information

GREENWOOD CITY COUNCIL. October 17, :35 p.m. MINUTES

GREENWOOD CITY COUNCIL. October 17, :35 p.m. MINUTES GREENWOOD CITY COUNCIL October 17, 2005-5:35 p.m. MINUTES PRESENT Council Members: Mayor Nicholson, Niki Hutto, Linda Edwards, Betty Boles, Herbert Vaughn, Johnny Williams, and Barbara Turnburke; City

More information

Hey everybody. Please feel free to sit at the table, if you want. We have lots of seats. And we ll get started in just a few minutes.

Hey everybody. Please feel free to sit at the table, if you want. We have lots of seats. And we ll get started in just a few minutes. HYDERABAD Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program Implementation Review Team Wednesday, November 09, 2016 11:00 to 12:15 IST ICANN57 Hyderabad, India AMY: Hey everybody. Please feel free to sit

More information

Welcome to the Narberth 2040

Welcome to the Narberth 2040 Welcome to the Narberth 2040 Comprehensive Plan Community Survey! Narberth Borough is in the process of drafting its first comprehensive plan and we need your input! The plan will outline the community

More information

REPORT

REPORT www.lilburncid.com 2017 REPORT BOARD MEMBERS Jim Vaught CID Chairman Ed O Connor CID Vice Chairman John Souter CID Secretary/Treasurer Bruce Arnett Jr. Chairman of Souter Enterprises Carnett s Management

More information

Francis City Planning Commission Meeting Thursday August 18, 2016

Francis City Planning Commission Meeting Thursday August 18, 2016 Francis City Planning Commission Meeting Thursday August 18, 2016 7:00 PM 2319 South Spring Hollow Road Francis, UT 84036 Present: Chair Kevin Cannon, Commissioner Trent Handsaker, Commissioner Shauna

More information

MINUTES OF MEETING HOOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

MINUTES OF MEETING HOOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MEETING HOOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Date: Time: 5:30 PM Place: Hoover Municipal Center Present: Mr. Mike Wood, Chairman Mr. Ron Harris Ms. Mari Morrison Mr. Kelly Bakane Mr. Allen

More information

RYE PLANNING BOARD RULES AND REGULATIONS COMMITTEE Monday, September 25, :00 p.m. Rye Town Hall

RYE PLANNING BOARD RULES AND REGULATIONS COMMITTEE Monday, September 25, :00 p.m. Rye Town Hall RYE PLANNING BOARD RULES AND REGULATIONS COMMITTEE Monday, September 25, 2017 3:00 p.m. Rye Town Hall Members Present: Chair Patricia Losik, Jeffrey Quinn and Steve Carter Others Present: Zoning Administrator

More information

City of Clermont MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 3, Page 1

City of Clermont MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 3, Page 1 Page 1 The meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order Tuesday at 7:00 p.m. by Chairwoman Cuqui Whitehead. Other members present were William Henning, Jr., Bernadette Dubuss, Raymond

More information

Item #1 Autozone Development Modification of Conditions 5221 Indian River Road District 1 Centerville February 10, 2010 CONSENT

Item #1 Autozone Development Modification of Conditions 5221 Indian River Road District 1 Centerville February 10, 2010 CONSENT Item #1 Autozone Development Modification of Conditions 5221 Indian River Road District 1 Centerville CONSENT Joseph Strange: The next items we will address are those that are placed on the consent agenda.

More information

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. April 15, 2002

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. April 15, 2002 TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS April 15, 2002 The Board of Zoning Appeals met on Monday, April 15, 2002 at 7:30 p.m. In attendance were Mr. Blevins, Mr. Haase and Mr. Matrana. ROLL CALL/DETERMINATION

More information

PLANNING, ZONING & BUILDING COMMISSION. CITY HALL August 14 17

PLANNING, ZONING & BUILDING COMMISSION. CITY HALL August 14 17 The City of Cortland Planning, Zoning & Building Commission met on Monday, August 14, 2017 at 6:50 P. M. at the City Administration Building, 400 N. High Street, Cortland, Ohio. In attendance were the

More information

CITY OF CLAWSON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PLANNING SERVICES

CITY OF CLAWSON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PLANNING SERVICES CITY OF CLAWSON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PLANNING SERVICES SUMMARY: The City of Clawson requests proposals to provide professional planning services. SUBMISSION: Please submit three (3) single-sided original,

More information

Sprague Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 2, 2019

Sprague Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 2, 2019 Sprague Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 2, 2019 Members Present: Sandor Bittman, Chairman Paul Piezzo Nicholas Velles Arthur Spielman Warren Baker Phyllis Nelson

More information

RESCHEDULED MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS JULY 5, 2006

RESCHEDULED MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS JULY 5, 2006 RESCHEDULED MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS JULY 5, 2006 MEMBERS PRESENT: The Board of Directors of the City of Texarkana, Arkansas, convened in rescheduled regular

More information

MINUTES OF THE WORK MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH

MINUTES OF THE WORK MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH MINUTES OF THE WORK MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH The Garden City Planning Commission held a work meeting on Wednesday, November 6, 2013 at the Garden City Lakeview Building located

More information

PETITIONS CONTINUES TO NOVEMBER 16, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING

PETITIONS CONTINUES TO NOVEMBER 16, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS October 19, 2015, 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Monnett: The Board of Zoning Appeals meeting for October 19, 2015. ROLL CALL/DETERMINATION OF QUORUM Mr. Monnett: I will

More information

REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES MAY 1, :00 p.m.

REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES MAY 1, :00 p.m. 0 0 0 0 REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES MAY, 0 :00 p.m. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: John Villescas, Chairman Robert Hearn,

More information

THE ALLEY SHOPS PORTFOLIO SALE

THE ALLEY SHOPS PORTFOLIO SALE THE 1326-1330 & 1420-1426 REISTERSTOWN ROAD, PIKESVILLE, MD 21208 Gilbert R. Trout 443.921.9332 gtrout@troutdaniel.com Table Of Contents Conidentiality & Disclaimer All materials and information received

More information

BANNER ELK PLANNING BOARD AND LAND USE UPDATE COMMITTEE JOINT MEETING, 04 JANUARY 2010 MINUTES

BANNER ELK PLANNING BOARD AND LAND USE UPDATE COMMITTEE JOINT MEETING, 04 JANUARY 2010 MINUTES BANNER ELK PLANNING BOARD AND LAND USE UPDATE COMMITTEE JOINT MEETING, 04 JANUARY 2010 MINUTES Members Present: Buster Burleson, John Collier, Dan Hemp, Paul Lehmann, Dawn Sellars, Ann Swinkola, Penny

More information

MINUTES KAMAS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, :00 p.m. Kamas City Hall, 170 N. Main Kamas, UT 84036

MINUTES KAMAS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, :00 p.m. Kamas City Hall, 170 N. Main Kamas, UT 84036 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 MINUTES KAMAS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY, 01 :00 p.m. Kamas City Hall, N. Main Kamas, UT Mayor Marchant opened the meeting welcoming those in attendance: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

More information

MINUTES OF THE VINEYARD TOWN WORK SESSION AND COUNCIL MEETING Vineyard Town hall, 240 East Gammon Road, Vineyard, Utah February 25, 2015, 6:00 PM

MINUTES OF THE VINEYARD TOWN WORK SESSION AND COUNCIL MEETING Vineyard Town hall, 240 East Gammon Road, Vineyard, Utah February 25, 2015, 6:00 PM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 MINUTES OF THE VINEYARD TOWN WORK SESSION AND COUNCIL MEETING Vineyard Town

More information

KANE COUNTY COUNTY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE TUESDAY, MAY 17, County Board Room Minutes 10:30 AM

KANE COUNTY COUNTY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE TUESDAY, MAY 17, County Board Room Minutes 10:30 AM KANE COUNTY COUNTY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2016 County Board Room Minutes 10:30 AM 1. Call to Order Kane County Government Center, 719 S. Batavia Ave., Bldg. A, Geneva, IL 60134 Chairman

More information

MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH

MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH The Garden City Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on Wednesday, August 3, 2011 at the Garden City Lakeview Room, located

More information

June 6, Chairman Ken Dull, Vice Chairman Jim Smith, Vivian Zeke Partin, Janice Clark, Jeff DeGroote

June 6, Chairman Ken Dull, Vice Chairman Jim Smith, Vivian Zeke Partin, Janice Clark, Jeff DeGroote WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 321 Causeway Drive, Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480 June 6, 2017 The Town of Wrightsville Beach Planning Board met at 6:00 p.m. in the Town Hall Council Chambers

More information

NORTH BERWICK, MAINE MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD APRIL 11, 2013

NORTH BERWICK, MAINE MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD APRIL 11, 2013 NORTH BERWICK, MAINE 03906 MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD APRIL 11, 2013 Present: Chairman Barry Chase, Lawrence Huntley, CEO, Rick Reynolds, Geoffrey Aleva, Mark Cahoon, Jon Morse, Anne Whitten Absent: Shaun

More information

Boise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 4, 2014 Page 1

Boise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 4, 2014 Page 1 Page 1 CVA14-00030 / SCOTT STEWART Location: 1493 W. Saint Patrick Street VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE STREET-SIDE SETBACK FROM 20 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 2 FEET AND REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK TO APPROXIMATELY

More information

KAYSVILLE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED Meeting Minutes JULY 19, 2018

KAYSVILLE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED Meeting Minutes JULY 19, 2018 KAYSVILLE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED Meeting Minutes JULY 19, 2018 Meeting Minutes of the July 19, 2018 K aysville City Council Meeting. Present: Mayor Witt, Council Member Barber, Council Member Page, Council

More information

SUBJECT TO DRB APPROVAL

SUBJECT TO DRB APPROVAL Town of St. Albans Development Review Board Meeting Minutes Thursday, October 12 th, 2017 6:30 p.m. On Thursday, October 12 th, 2017 at 6:30 p.m., the Town of St. Albans Development Review Board met at

More information

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of November 20, :30 p.m.

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of November 20, :30 p.m. CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of 7:30 p.m. Board of Appeals Members Present: Kenneth Evans, Richard Baldin, John Rusnov, David Houlé, Tom Smeader Administration:

More information

REGULAR MEETING OF LURAY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 13, 2014

REGULAR MEETING OF LURAY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 13, 2014 REGULAR MEETING OF LURAY PLANNING COMMISSION The Luray Planning Commission met on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in regular session. The meeting was held in the Luray Town Council Chambers at

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 11, :00 P.M. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Darby.

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 11, :00 P.M. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Darby. AUGUST 11, 2015 7:00 P.M. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Darby. II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Richard Bauer, Don Darby, Robert Diehl, Carolyn Ghantous,

More information

MINUTES PITTSBURG PLANNING COMMISSION

MINUTES PITTSBURG PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PITTSBURG PLANNING COMMISSION December 11, 2001 A regular meeting of the Pittsburg Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Holmes at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday,

More information

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of March 25, :30 p.m.

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of March 25, :30 p.m. CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of 7:30 p.m. Present - Board of Appeals Members: Kenneth Evans, Richard Baldin, John Rusnov, David Houlé Administration: Assistant

More information

STREETSBORO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. Regular Meeting June 13, PM

STREETSBORO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. Regular Meeting June 13, PM Note: These minutes were compiled by extracting certain facts the essence of testimony from an audiotape made of this meeting. Complete detail and verbatim statements can be heard and transcribed from

More information

Page 1 of 6 Champlin City Council

Page 1 of 6 Champlin City Council Minutes of the Proceedings of the City Council of the City of Champlin in the County of Hennepin and the State of Minnesota Pursuant to Due Call and Notice Thereof Regular Session August 11, 2014 Municipal

More information

PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION September 9,

PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION September 9, PLAINFEILD PLAN COMMISSION For September 9, 2010, 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mr. Gibbs: I d like to call to order the September 9 th Plan Commission meeting. Mr. Carlucci would you poll the Board to determine

More information

PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS January 16, :00 p.m.

PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS January 16, :00 p.m. PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS January 16, 2017 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Monnett: I will now call to order the Plainfield Board of Zoning Appeals meeting for January 16, 2017. SWEARING IN OF NEW MEMBERS

More information

FLOWER MOUND TOWN COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 18, 2010 BOOK 38 PAGE 219

FLOWER MOUND TOWN COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 18, 2010 BOOK 38 PAGE 219 FLOWER MOUND TOWN COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 18, 2010 BOOK 38 PAGE 219 THE FLOWER MOUND TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION HELD ON THE 18 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010 IN THE FLOWER MOUND TOWN HALL, LOCATED AT 2121

More information

Cheryl Hannan: Is the applicant here? Could you please come up to the microphone and give your name and address for the record.

Cheryl Hannan: Is the applicant here? Could you please come up to the microphone and give your name and address for the record. The North Royalton Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on January 29, 2014, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 13834 Ridge Road, North Royalton, Ohio. Chairperson Cheryl Hannan called the meeting

More information

THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF AVON REGARDING MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES

THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF AVON REGARDING MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MONDAY, JULY 13, 2015 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:15 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 72-15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1262.08(c) OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF AVON REGARDING MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY

More information

CABLE/ VOLTAIRE, VOLTAIRE AND 4920 VOLTAIRE SAN DIEGO, CA OFFERING MEMORANDUM

CABLE/ VOLTAIRE, VOLTAIRE AND 4920 VOLTAIRE SAN DIEGO, CA OFFERING MEMORANDUM 2216-2218 CABLE/4904-4906 VOLTAIRE, 4912-4918 VOLTAIRE AND 4920 VOLTAIRE SAN DIEGO, CA 92107 OFFERING MEMORANDUM PRESENTED BY Judy Preston CA BRE Lic. 01074104 619.309.9559 Judy@TeamPreston.net Jim Greer

More information

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH The Garden City Town Council held their regularly scheduled meeting on September 8, 2011 at the Garden City Office, located at 69 N. Paradise

More information

TOWN OF BEDFORD November 19, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES

TOWN OF BEDFORD November 19, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES TOWN OF BEDFORD November 19, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES A meeting of the Bedford Planning Board was held on Monday, November 19, 2018 at Ross A. Lurgio Middle School Café, 47A Nashua Road, Bedford, NH.

More information

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION. December 3, 2007

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION. December 3, 2007 TOWN OF PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION December 3, 2007 The Plainfield Plan Commission met on Monday, December 3, 2007. In attendance were Mr. Satterfield, Mr. Matrana, Mr. McPhail, Mr. Brandgard, Mr. Gibbs,

More information

Adas Torah - an Orthodox Jewish synagogue - seeks to relocate from the Beverlywood to Pico Robertson area. Adaptive reuse of the vacant Victory

Adas Torah - an Orthodox Jewish synagogue - seeks to relocate from the Beverlywood to Pico Robertson area. Adaptive reuse of the vacant Victory Adas Torah - an Orthodox Jewish synagogue - seeks to relocate from the Beverlywood to Pico Robertson area. Adaptive reuse of the vacant Victory Furniture building significant façade remodel, interior floor

More information

Albemarle County Planning Commission September 25, 2018

Albemarle County Planning Commission September 25, 2018 Albemarle County Planning Commission September 25, 2018 The Albemarle County Planning Commission held a public hearing on Tuesday, September 25, 2018, at 6:00 p.m., at the County Office Building, Lane

More information

MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015

MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015 MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015 A regular meeting of the of the Borough of Madison was held on the 1st day of December 2015 at 7:30 P.M., in the Court

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE NO. 2012-10 AN ORDINANCE REVISING AND CLARIFYING THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR RETAIL/OFFICE/FLEX AND MIXED USES IN THE JUNCTION AT MIDVALE OVERLAY (SECTION 17-7-9.12.2); ALSO PROVIDING A SAVING

More information

GENERAL BUSINESS ITEMS:

GENERAL BUSINESS ITEMS: AGENDA LINDSTROM SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 4:30 P.M. Lindstrom City Hall 13292 Sylvan Ave., Lindstrom, MN CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE: CALL OF ROLL: GENERAL BUSINESS ITEMS: 1.

More information

ROUND HILL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES November 10, Pastor Jeffery Witt, RHUMC 4 citizens

ROUND HILL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES November 10, Pastor Jeffery Witt, RHUMC 4 citizens Page 1 ROUND HILL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES November 10, 2009 The regular meeting of the Round Hill Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 in the Town Office, 23 Main

More information

MINUTES. Staff (2): Mr. Gary Roth and Mr. Jeremy Bradham, Capital Area Preservation, Inc. (CAP)

MINUTES. Staff (2): Mr. Gary Roth and Mr. Jeremy Bradham, Capital Area Preservation, Inc. (CAP) MINUTES Wake County Historic Preservation Commission Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:30 PM Room 2800 Wake County Justice Center 301 S. McDowell Street, Raleigh, North Carolina Members Present (10): Mr. Ed

More information

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. July 21, 2003

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. July 21, 2003 TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS July 21, 2003 The Board of Zoning Appeals met on Monday, July 21, 2003 at 7:30 p.m. In attendance were Mr. Monnett, Mr. Haase, Mr. Matrana, Mr. Shrum and Mr.

More information

TAF_RZERC Executive Session_29Oct17

TAF_RZERC Executive Session_29Oct17 Okay, so we re back to recording for the RZERC meeting here, and we re moving on to do agenda item number 5, which is preparation for the public meeting, which is on Wednesday. Right before the meeting

More information

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH LOUIS DE LA FLOR 116-B ROCKINGHAM ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH LOUIS DE LA FLOR 116-B ROCKINGHAM ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: JULY

More information

Town of Northumberland Planning Board Minutes Monday, July 16, :00 pm Page 1 of 6 Approved by Planning Board with corrections

Town of Northumberland Planning Board Minutes Monday, July 16, :00 pm Page 1 of 6 Approved by Planning Board with corrections Page 1 of 6 Present: Lofgren Patricia Bryant, Chairperson, James Heber, Susan Martindale, Kevin Pumiglia, Joseph Kowalewski and CJ Absent: Brit Basinger, Vice-Chairperson, Jeff King and Wayne Durr Town

More information

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T January 28, 2015 CASE NO: PROJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DETAILS: ZA14-115 Specific Use Permit for Above Ground Cisterns at Stadium Southwest

More information

STAFF RECOMMENDATION RELEVANT COUNCIL GOAL PROPOSED MOTION

STAFF RECOMMENDATION RELEVANT COUNCIL GOAL PROPOSED MOTION TO: FOM: E: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BETT BUNINGHAM, PLANNING ADMINISTATO Discussion and Possible Approval of P17-0126, Ben Franklin Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS) Meetinghouse

More information

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH ELAINE DALTON 22 ELMER AVE HOOKSETT, NH 03106

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH ELAINE DALTON 22 ELMER AVE HOOKSETT, NH 03106 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: OCTOBER

More information

The minutes of the meeting October 25, 2011 were approved on a motion by Commissioner Young. Commissioner Harrell seconded and all voted in favor.

The minutes of the meeting October 25, 2011 were approved on a motion by Commissioner Young. Commissioner Harrell seconded and all voted in favor. MINUTES OF THE CITY OF PIGEON FORGE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS TUESDAY DECEMBER 13, 2011, 3:00 P.M. CITY HALL, PIGEON FORGE, TENNESSEE MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Bill Bradley,

More information

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE NEWCASTLE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY (Opening Prayer & Flag Salute)

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE NEWCASTLE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY (Opening Prayer & Flag Salute) MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE NEWCASTLE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY (Opening Prayer & Flag Salute) DATE: October 9, 2018 TIME: 6:00 P.M. PLACE: NEWCASTLE MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER 705 NW 10 TH STREET ITEM 1: CALL

More information

TOWN OF DOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, September 17, 2008, AT 7:00 PM AT THE DOVER TOWN HALL:

TOWN OF DOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, September 17, 2008, AT 7:00 PM AT THE DOVER TOWN HALL: APPROVED 10/15/08 TOWN OF DOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, September 17, 2008, AT 7:00 PM AT THE DOVER TOWN HALL: PRESENT: Chair Marilyn VanMillon Member George Wittman

More information

CITY OF NORWALK PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE. May 9, 2013

CITY OF NORWALK PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE. May 9, 2013 CITY OF NORWALK PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE PRESENT: Jill Jacobson, Chair; Adam Blank; Harry Rilling; Joseph Santo; Michael O Reilly STAFF: OTHERS: Mike Wrinn; Dori Wilson; Frank Strauch Atty. Liz Suchy; Kate

More information

PLANNING, ZONING & BUILDING COMMISSION. CITY HALL August 11 14

PLANNING, ZONING & BUILDING COMMISSION. CITY HALL August 11 14 The City of Cortland Planning, Zoning & Building Commission met on Monday, August 11, 2014 at 6:30 P. M. at the City Administration Building, 400 N. High Street, Cortland, Ohio. In attendance were the

More information

PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION. April 7, 2003

PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION. April 7, 2003 PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION April 7, 2003 The Plainfield Plan Commission met on Monday, April 7, 2003. In attendance were Mr. Thibo, Mr. Matrana, Mr. McPhail, Mr. Brandgard, Mr. Cavanaugh, Mr. Ward and

More information

Minutes of the New Hanover County Planning Board November 3, 2011

Minutes of the New Hanover County Planning Board November 3, 2011 Minutes of the New Hanover County Planning Board November 3, 2011 The New Hanover County Planning Board met Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. in the Assembly Room of the Historic County Courthouse,

More information

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION. February 5, 2007

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION. February 5, 2007 TOWN OF PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION February 5, 2007 The Plainfield Plan Commission met on Monday, February 5, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. In attendance were Mr. Matrana, Mr. McPhail, Mr. Brandgard, Mr. Gibbs, Mr.

More information

MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING MAY 15, 2018

MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING MAY 15, 2018 MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING MAY 15, 2018 A regular meeting of the Planning Board of the Borough of Madison was held on the 15th day of May 2018 at 7:30 P.M., in the

More information

CHARLEVOIX COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

CHARLEVOIX COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CHARLEVOIX COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 301 State Street Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 (231) 547-7234 planning@charlevoixcounty.org Approved Meeting Minutes October 1, 2015 I. Call to Order Chairman Jason called

More information

TOWN OF MAIDEN. March 20, 2017 MINUTES OF MEETING

TOWN OF MAIDEN. March 20, 2017 MINUTES OF MEETING TOWN OF MAIDEN March 20, 2017 MINUTES OF MEETING The Maiden Town Council met on Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. for their regular meeting, held in the Council Chambers at the Maiden Town Hall. Present

More information

David M. Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District

David M. Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. March 15, 2004

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. March 15, 2004 TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS March 15, 2004 The Board of Zoning Appeals met on Monday, March 15, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. In attendance were Mr. Monnett, Mr. Blevins, Mr. Shrum, Mr. Haase and Mr.

More information

Clark Wilkinson. Tamilyn Fillmore. William Ince. Stephanie Ivie George McEwan. Robyn Mecham. Katie Rust, Recording Secretary

Clark Wilkinson. Tamilyn Fillmore. William Ince. Stephanie Ivie George McEwan. Robyn Mecham. Katie Rust, Recording Secretary 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 Minutes of the Centerville City Council meeting held Tuesday, December, at :00 p. m. at Centerville City Hall, 0 North Main Street, Centerville, Utah. MEMBERS PRESENT Mayor Council Members

More information

TOWNSHIP OF LOPATCONG PLANNING BOARD MEETING

TOWNSHIP OF LOPATCONG PLANNING BOARD MEETING TOWNSHIP OF LOPATCONG PLANNING BOARD MEETING October 26, 2016 The meeting of the Planning Board of the Township of Lopatcong was called to order by Chairman VanVliet at 7:00 pm. A silent prayer was offered

More information