CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies"

Transcription

1 CRITICAL THINKING FAULTY REASONING (VAUGHN CH. 5) LECTURE PROFESSOR JULIE YOO Formal v Informal Fallacies Irrelevant Premises Genetic Fallacy Composition Division Appeal to the Person (ad hominem/tu quoque) Equivocation Appeal to Popularity Appeal to Tradition Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Emotion Red Herring Straw Man Unacceptable Premises Begging the Question False Dilemma Slippery Slope Hasty Generalization Faulty Analogy Faulty Reasoning (Vaughn Ch. 5) Page 1 of 8

2 FORMAL V INFORMAL FALLACIES Some reasoning can be formalized. This means that we can formulate the reasoning almost like an algebraic formula with variables that can take on any sentence as individual values. We already saw some examples of formal reasoning, namely, modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism, and disjunctive syllogism, along with many different types of categorical syllogisms. These are good ways of no matter what you substitute in for the content of the antecedent or consequent, which is the hallmark of valid deduction. Other ways of reasoning, however, are highly sensitive to the content; they cannot be formalized. Inductive reasoning, in fact, is informal in this sense. For instance, how many dogs must you need to sample in order for All dogs bark to be a strong inductive generalization? There is no way to specify in advance how many samples one needs. Faulty reasoning can be divided into two broad kinds, according to whether the reasoning is formal or informal. Formal fallacies include denying the antecedent and affirming the consequent. The ones we will examine here are of the informal variety, which means that the badness of the reasoning is highly sensitive to the content and the context in which they are generated. Even though the reasoning is bad, these fallacies often have a compelling pull upon the listener, which is probably why they are committed so often and thus have acquired names. IRRELEVANT PREMISES Genetic Fallacy Definition: An argument commits the genetic fallacy when something is claimed to be true (or false) solely because of its origin. The world was created in 6 days because the Bible says so. Gay marriage is illegal because the Pope disapproves of it. You can forget about the rumors of John Edwards s affair because it was reported in the National Enquirer. This type of reasoning is fallacious because it does not defend (or criticize) a claim on the basis of its merit, but rather on its source. In general, where an idea comes from is irrelevant to its truth (or falsity). It can be good or bad, regardless of who or where it comes from. Caveat: This might be a bit confusing, since this seems to conflict with using experts as a legitimate source of evidence. As we say in the previous chapter, in some cases, it is perfectly legitimate to believe something because an expert claims that it is true. In fact, many of our beliefs are justified in this way. The difference between legitimately using and expert and committing the genetic fallacy comes down to the way in which the source is cited: when one commits the genetic fallacy, one simply assumes that there is no more to backing up a conclusion than citing the source, whereas in a legitimate use of experts, one cautiously cites the track record of a source (the expert) as one among several factors in supporting the conclusion. Faulty Reasoning (Vaughn Ch. 5) Page 2 of 8

3 Composition Definition: An argument commits the fallacy of composition when one assumes that just because the parts of a thing have a certain feature, the thing itself has that feature. The molecules in the ocean are smaller than a pin, and so the ocean is smaller than a pin. Every organ, such as the eyes, heart, lungs, in a person serves a purpose, so the person himself or herself must also serve a purpose. Individuals contribute $100 a year to the orphanage, whereas corporations contribute $1,000 a year. So the orphanage gets much more of its money from corporations than from individuals. The first example is fairly easy to detect as a fallacy, but the second example, though equally a fallacy, might sound plausible. However, the argument is certainly no acceptable, not only because it commits the fallacy of composition, but because it equivocates on the term, purpose. In its first occurrence, it is used in the sense of biological purpose, but the second occurrence is not clear about what type of purpose is being suggested moral, social, spiritual? Caveat: Not all instances of thus type of reasoning are result in a false or dubious conclusion. Consider a fancy five-course meal. Suppose every part of the meal each one of its courses was delicious. It is reasonable to conclude that the whole meal was also delicious. In this case, compositional reasoning led to an acceptable conclusion. This means that it really depends on the subject matter and the context in which this reasoning is used. Division Definition: An argument commits the fallacy of division when one assumes that just because a thing has a certain feature, its parts also have that feature. The cake Jack baked is very sweet, so each ingredient in Jack s cake must also be sweet. The boat floats upon the water, so each part of the boat must also float upon the water. The orphanage gets a greater portion of its charity from corporations than from individuals. So corporation X must have contributed more than individual Y. Caveat: The fallacy of division is reverse of the fallacy of composition. It involves the illegitimate inference from the nature of the whole to its parts, or a characteristic of a group to its members. Just like its cousin, there are instances of divisional reasoning that are not fallacious. Faulty Reasoning (Vaughn Ch. 5) Page 3 of 8

4 Appeal to the Person (ad hominem/tu quoque) Definition: An argument commits the ad hominem fallacy when discredits a claim by attacking its author. Animals and humans didn t evolve. The people who say they did are godless atheists who want to lie to our children. Congressman X says that we have to increase state taxes to fund public education. But his is preposterous. Of course Congressman X would say that; he has 6 children who are all in public schools. You can t give the job of US Surgeon General to Dr. Regina Benjamin because she s really fat. How good can she be at her job of prescribing health standards for all Americans if herself is overweight? Claims have to be judged on their own merits, not on the basis of the character, motives, or circumstances of their authors, which are usually irrelevant to the merit of the claim. In an ad hominem, these are brought to bear on the credibility of a claim, and there are many versions of it. There is what is known as an abusive ad hominem, where one discredits the claim by attacking author of the argument; this is illustrated in the first example. Another is what is known as circumstantial ad hominem, where one discredits the claim by attacking the circumstances of the author; this is illustrated in the second example. And another kind is known as tu quoque, which is when one uses the charge of hypocrisy to discredit the hypocrite s claim; this is illustrated in the second example. Caveat: Sometimes, the context or situation demands that we take the credibility of a person into account when evaluating the truth of what they say. If a witness in a trial has been proven to be a frequent liar, then we have to suspend our belief about their claim (not disbelieve their claim outright). Another situation might be a job that calls for a high degree of personal ethics, like the priesthood or some branches of public office. Equivocation Definition: An argument commits the fallacy of equivocation when one uses a word in two (or more) different senses when drawing the conclusion. Smith is the murderer because the one who killed Jones was at the bank at noon, and Smith was at the bank at noon. Only God can perform miracles, which can be seen in the smile of a child. So simply by seeing happy children we can know that God exists. An equivocated word need to reappear in the argument in order for the fallacy of equivocation to take place. This reappearance is present in the first example, but not in the second. In the second example, the argument uses the word miracle only once, but in a deliberately ambiguous way, one to mean the violation of laws of nature (like parting the red sea, a talking Faulty Reasoning (Vaughn Ch. 5) Page 4 of 8

5 burning bush, etc.), which is the literal sense of miracle that would strongly support God existence, and the other to mean a thing of beauty, which is a figurative sense of miracle that has no support for God s existence. Appeal to Popularity Definition: An argument commits the fallacy of appeal to popularity when it argues that a claim must be true because a lot of people endorse it, or false because a lot of people reject it. So many people believe that there is a Higher Power. So surely there has to exist some divine being, which we call God. If we want better public schools, we need to raise taxes. But that is a bad policy because everyone will hate paying higher taxes. Of course a majority of the people can believe a claim and the claim turns out to be true, but surely the claim is not true because a majority of the people believe it. Yet the fallacy of the appeal to popularity makes exactly this assumption. The same goes for the falsity of a claim and a majority of the people rejecting it. Another fallacy known as appeal to tradition works in a similar way. An argument commits the fallacy of appeal to tradition when it argues that a claim must be true because it s a part of tradition, or false because there is no tradition. Appeal to Ignorance Definition: An argument commits the fallacy of appeal to ignorance when it argues for a claim from the very lack of evidence. There is no evidence that unicorns don t exist. So there must be unicorns. It s just that they have never been seen. There is no concrete evidence that life evolved from inanimate matter. So that must mean that God created living things. From a lack of evidence, you cannot conclude one thing or another. And yet, the fallacy is drawing exactly this kind of conclusion. Caveat: This is different from when we conduct a careful experiment or test and in its search for something, finds no evidence of that thing. In this case, there is good reason to reject the existence of the thing that was actively searched for. For instance, there is no evidence that shaking hands with people infected with HIV will pass on the virus. The lack of evidence after a rigorous search is a meaningful piece of evidence. It is thus different from a lack of evidence without a rigorous search. Faulty Reasoning (Vaughn Ch. 5) Page 5 of 8

6 Appeal to Emotion Definition: An argument commits the fallacy of appeal to emotion when it argues for the conclusion by trying to arouse the listener s guilt, anger, pity, or other emotion. You can t convict this woman. She has suffered her entire life, she has 5 poor children who depend on her, and because of her cancer, she only has two years to live. A claim is believable or not depending upon the evidence there is backing it up; the emotions that happen to be aroused in the listener (or in the author) are usually not relevant to the evidence for the claim. Often, the fallacy will use visual or cinematic aids. Caveat: Not all appeals to emotion are fallacious. Sometimes, a moving description of a tragic situation is an appropriate premise for an argument. For instance, a clear representation of the negative impact of global trading on the children on South America can certainly serve as a relevant premise in an argument why corporations should change their trade policies. Red Herring Definition: An argument commits the red herring fallacy when it raises an irrelevant issue during an argument to throw the opponent off the topic under discussion. Yes, we do spray our produce with carcinogenic pesticides, but that shouldn t stop people from buying our produce. A healthy diet needs lots of fruits and vegetables. Studies constantly show how a healthy diet is essential to a healthy body. We should all try to include more fruits and vegetables in our diets. So people should buy our produce. Did I have an adulterous affair? I worked day and night to raise money for the children s hospital, the hospital that the poor children of our community have been waiting for. I have put in more hours than any of my predecessors in raising money for this much needed hospital. In a red herring fallacy, the arguer usually changes the subject and diverts attention away from the subject matter that is being debated. By doing this, the arguer avoids having to answer hard questions. This is an oft-used trick of many politicians. Straw Man Definition: An argument commits the straw fallacy when it distorts, oversimplifies, or weakens the opponent s argument in order to make it easier to dismiss the opponent s position. Faulty Reasoning (Vaughn Ch. 5) Page 6 of 8

7 Evolutionists think that you can build an eye from simple cells and chemicals. But surely nothing as complex and sophisticated as an eye can come from such base components! My opponent believes in legalizing medical marijuana, but that is a dangerous and irresponsible view. If people got access to marijuana, you send the message that people can do whatever they want. No society can survive that way. In a straw man fallacy, you basically weaken and oversimplify your opponents argument so that his or her position sounds ridiculous, making it that much easier for you to dismiss it. But this does not really engage with the issues. In addition, you lose the opportunity to strengthen your own view. UNACCEPTABLE PREMISES Begging the Question Definition: An argument commits the fallacy of begging the question when presupposes to truth of its conclusions, rather than independently establishing proving the conclusion. This magic 8 ball answers everything. You want to know who you re going to date in 2 months? Just ask the magic 8 ball. You want to know whether it is reliable? Just ask the magic ball. This is a fallacy because rather than prove that something is the case, the argument already assumes what you are being asked to prove. False Dilemma Definition: An argument commits the fallacy of begging the false dilemma fallacy when it forces a conclusion on the basis of two choices, when in fact there are more choices, and hence conclusions, to consider. You are either a good religious church-goer or a Godless heathen. This is a fallacy because it limits the possible conclusions one can draw from the get-go. By making your opponent believe that there are only the options you mention, you dismiss the alternatives that could be better. Slippery Slope Definition: An argument commits the slippery slope fallacy when it claims that taking a certain step will inevitably lead to a dire conclusion. Faulty Reasoning (Vaughn Ch. 5) Page 7 of 8

8 If you smoke, you ll become a prostitute. Once you start smoking, you get addicted to other substances. These other substances will be very expensive, and because your body will need it, you ll do anything to satisfy that craving. So you ll turn some tricks just to get money for your drug addiction. Caveat: Not all instances of apparently slippery slope reasoning are fallacious. Sometimes, certain causes will have certain effects that ultimately accumulate to a final situation. Hasty Generalization Definition: An argument commits the hasty generalization fallacy when it draws a grand conclusion from the basis of a very small and unrepresentative sample. I visited New York for a few hours and people were so rude. All New Yorkers are really rude. It is easy for form generalizations (stereotypes) on the basis of a meager sample. How much is enough for a good strong generalization? This is not answerable in advance and independently of the context. Faulty Analogy Definition: An argument commits the faulty analogy fallacy when it draw a conclusion on the basis of an inappropriate analogy or comparison. Every well designed artifact, like a watch, has a designer. The world is well designed. So the world has a designed. These fallacies can be very alluring when the things beings compared seem similar in certain respects. But each case if different, which is why each case needs to be evaluated on its own terms. Faulty Reasoning (Vaughn Ch. 5) Page 8 of 8

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this? What is an argument? PHIL 110 Lecture on Chapter 3 of How to think about weird things An argument is a collection of two or more claims, one of which is the conclusion and the rest of which are the premises.

More information

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws. Fallacies 1. Hasty generalization Definition: Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or too small). Stereotypes about

More information

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument General Overview: As our students often attest, we all live in a complex world filled with demanding issues and bewildering challenges. In order to determine those

More information

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around

More information

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your

More information

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope Fallacies in logic Hasty Generalization Definition: Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or just too small). Stereotypes

More information

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument Vs Persuasion Everything s an argument, really. Argument: appeals strictly by reason and logic Persuasion: logic and emotion The forum of your argument

More information

Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments

Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments 1 Agenda 1. Reductio Ad Absurdum 2. Burden of Proof 3. Argument by Analogy 4. Bad Forms of Arguments 1. Begging the Question

More information

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life Chapter 1 What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life Why Study Philosophy? Defining Philosophy Studying philosophy in a serious and reflective way will change you as a person Philosophy Is

More information

APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES

APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES Critical thinking is reasonable and reflective thinking aimed at deciding what to believe and what to do. Throughout this book, we have identified mistakes that a

More information

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS I. LOGIC AND ARGUMENTATION 1 A. LOGIC 1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. 3. It doesn t attempt to determine how people in fact reason. 4.

More information

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition Argumentative Fallacies The Logic of Writing and Debate from http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.html

More information

Full file at

Full file at Chapter 1 What is Philosophy? Summary Chapter 1 introduces students to main issues and branches of philosophy. The chapter begins with a basic definition of philosophy. Philosophy is an activity, and addresses

More information

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand), Doc Holley s Logical Fallacies In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise

More information

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments) The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments) Adapted from: An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments: Learn the lost art of making sense by Ali Almossawi *Not, by any stretch of the imagination,

More information

The Argumentative Essay

The Argumentative Essay The Argumentative Essay but what is the difference between an argument and a quarrel? Academic argumentation is based on logical, structured evidence that attempts the reader to accept an opinion, take

More information

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16 LOGIC Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning Arguments reason from the specific to the general. It is important because this reasoning is based on what we learn from our experiences. Specific observations

More information

How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA

How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA How To Recognize and Avoid Them Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA Fallacies are logical errors that weaken arguments Commonplace Can be persuasive to the uninformed Can be driven by agendas or strong

More information

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase post hoc, ergo propter hoc, which translates as after this, therefore because of this. So what do fallacies look like? For each fallacy listed, there is a definition or explanation, an example, and a tip on how to avoid committing the fallacy in your own arguments. Hasty generalization Definition:

More information

Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics because, since, given that, for because Given that Since for Because

Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics because, since, given that, for because Given that Since for Because Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics It is useful to think of an argument as a list of sentences.[1] The last sentence is the conclusion, and the other sentences are the premises. Thus: (1) No professors

More information

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training Study Guides Chapter 1 - Basic Training Argument: A group of propositions is an argument when one or more of the propositions in the group is/are used to give evidence (or if you like, reasons, or grounds)

More information

Common Logical Fallacies

Common Logical Fallacies Common Logical Fallacies Effective arguments rely on logic and facts for support, yet speakers and authors, whether intentionally or unintentionally, can mislead an audience with a flaw in reasoning. Readers

More information

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to

More information

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz Please take out a few pieces of paper and a pen or pencil. Write your name, the date, your class period, and a title at the top of the

More information

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14 Unit 4 Reason as a way of knowing I. Reasoning At its core, reasoning is using what is known as building blocks to create new knowledge I use the words logic and reasoning interchangeably. Technically,

More information

Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center

Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center The Writing Center Fallacies Like 40 people like this. What this handout is about This handout discusses common logical fallacies that you may encounter in your own writing or the writing of others. The

More information

Chapter 6: Relevance Fallacies

Chapter 6: Relevance Fallacies Chapter 6: Relevance Fallacies Let s do a brief review. We know that with deductive reasoning, a valid argument guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are assumed to be true. We know that

More information

Fallacies. What this handout is about. Arguments. What are fallacies?

Fallacies. What this handout is about. Arguments. What are fallacies? The Writing Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb Fallacies What this handout is about This handout is on common logical fallacies that you may encounter in

More information

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies 1 Learning Outcomes In this lesson we will: 1.Define logical fallacy using the SEE-I. 2.Understand and apply the concept of relevance. 3.Define,

More information

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B Practice Test Three Fall 2015 True or False True = A, False = B 1. The inclusive "or" means "A or B or both A and B." 2. The conclusion contains both the major term and the middle term. 3. "If, then" statements

More information

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Precising definition Theoretical definition Persuasive definition Syntactic definition Operational definition 1. Are questions about defining a phrase

More information

Philosophical Arguments

Philosophical Arguments Philosophical Arguments An introduction to logic and philosophical reasoning. Nathan D. Smith, PhD. Houston Community College Nathan D. Smith. Some rights reserved You are free to copy this book, to distribute

More information

Evaluating Arguments

Evaluating Arguments Govier: A Practical Study of Argument 1 Evaluating Arguments Chapter 4 begins an important discussion on how to evaluate arguments. The basics on how to evaluate arguments are presented in this chapter

More information

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic Standardizing and Diagramming In Reason and the Balance we have taken the approach of using a simple outline to standardize short arguments,

More information

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts. PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1 W# Section (10 or 11) 1. True or False (5 points) Directions: Circle the letter next to the best answer. 1. T F All true statements are valid. 2. T

More information

Answers to Practice Problems 7.3

Answers to Practice Problems 7.3 Answers to Practice Problems 7.3 Identify the fallacy in each statement or exchange. 1. Jim says that it is bad to invest in bonds right now. What does he know; he s just a janitor! d. equivocation 2.

More information

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B Practice Test Three Spring 2015 True or False True = A, False = B 1. A sound argument is a valid deductive argument with true premisses. 2. A conclusion is a statement of support. 3. An easy way to determine

More information

C. Problem set #1 due today, now, on the desk. B. More of an art than a science the key things are: 4.

C. Problem set #1 due today, now, on the desk. B. More of an art than a science the key things are: 4. Lecture 4: The Language of Argument Philosophy 130 September 22 and 27, 2016 O Rourke & Gibson I. Administrative A. Questions? B. Read Ch. 3 & pp. 90-94 C. Problem set #1 due today, now, on the desk II.

More information

The Philosopher s World Cup

The Philosopher s World Cup The Philosopher s World Cup Monty Python & the Flying Circus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92vv3qgagck&feature=related What is an argument? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqfkti6gn9y What is an argument?

More information

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading Developed by Jamie A. Hughes, South Campus Learning Center, Communications Lab 04-25-05 Permission to copy and use is granted to all FCCJ staff provided this

More information

A man lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. Every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building.

A man lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. Every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building. A man lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. Every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building. In the evening, he gets into the elevator, and, if there is someone

More information

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent Critical Thinking Lecture Four October 5, 2012 Chapter 3 Deductive Argument Patterns Diagramming Arguments Deductive Argument Patterns - There are some common patterns shared by many deductive arguments

More information

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens. INTRODUCTION TO LOGICAL THINKING Lecture 6: Two types of argument and their role in science: Deduction and induction 1. Deductive arguments Arguments that claim to provide logically conclusive grounds

More information

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES Instructions: Determine whether the following are propositions. If some are not propositions, see if they can be rewritten as propositions. (1) I have a very refined sense of smell.

More information

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because. Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches

More information

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff! Logic Book Part 1 by Skylar Ruloff Contents Introduction 3 I Validity and Soundness 4 II Argument Forms 10 III Counterexamples and Categorical Statements 15 IV Strength and Cogency 21 2 Introduction This

More information

Logic Chapter 3 Practice Test Matching: Match each of the following concepts to the most accurate definition.

Logic Chapter 3 Practice Test Matching: Match each of the following concepts to the most accurate definition. Logic Chapter 3 Practice Test Matching: Match each of the following concepts to the most accurate definition. Fallacy Arguer uses a threat to convince the audience. Bandwagon Arguer arouses desire to be

More information

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant when they do not 1 Non Sequitur Latin for it does

More information

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT Deduction Fallacies Term Definition Example(s) 1 Equivocation Ambiguity 2 types: The word or phrase may be ambiguous, in which case it has more than one distinct meaning

More information

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever. BASIC ARGUMENTATION Alfred Snider, University of Vermont World Schools Debate Academy, Slovenia, 2015 Induction, deduction, causation, fallacies INDUCTION Definition: studying a sufficient number of analogous

More information

LOGICAL FALLACIES. Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments. (these are bad don t use them ) AP English Language & Composition

LOGICAL FALLACIES. Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments. (these are bad don t use them ) AP English Language & Composition LOGICAL FALLACIES Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments (these are bad don t use them ) AP English Language & Composition ALWAYS BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR FAULTY REASONING! DEFINITION Logical fallacies are flaws

More information

Reviewfrom Last Class

Reviewfrom Last Class Reviewfrom Last Class The most used fallacy on Earth! Ad Hominem Several Types of Ad Hominem Fallacies 1. Personal Attack Ad Hominem 2. Inconsistency Ad Hominem 3. Circumstantial Ad Hominem 4. Poisoning

More information

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics Critical Thinking Lecture 1 Background Material for the Exercise on Validity Reasons, Arguments, and the Concept of Validity 1. The Concept of Validity Consider

More information

Fallacies Keep in Your Binder

Fallacies Keep in Your Binder Fallacies Keep in Your Binder What this handout is about This handout is on common logical fallacies that you may encounter in your own writing or the writing of others. The handout provides definitions,

More information

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC FOR PRIVATE REGISTRATION TO BA PHILOSOPHY PROGRAMME 1. Logic is the science of-----------. A) Thought B) Beauty C) Mind D) Goodness 2. Aesthetics is the science of ------------.

More information

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? . What is the purpose of argumentation? Argumentation 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? According to Toulmin (964), the checking list can be outlined as follows: () The Claim

More information

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims 1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims In the previous tutorial we saw that the standard of acceptability of a statement (or premise) depends on the context. In certain contexts we may only require

More information

Our Guide to Better Grades

Our Guide to Better Grades Paper Feedback Presents: Our Guide to Better Grades Your entire university experience is centred on developing critical thinking skills. It s about utilising logical arguments in defence of a position

More information

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims. Basics of Argument and Rhetoric Although arguing, speaking our minds, and getting our points across are common activities for most of us, applying specific terminology to these activities may not seem

More information

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument ARGUMENT Questions for Critically Reading an Argument What claims does the writer make? What kinds and quality of evidence does the writer provide to support the claim? What assumptions underlie the argument,

More information

This online lecture was prepared by Dr. Laura Umphrey in the School of Communication at Northern Arizona University

This online lecture was prepared by Dr. Laura Umphrey in the School of Communication at Northern Arizona University This online lecture was prepared by Dr. Laura Umphrey in the School of Communication at Northern Arizona University Motivated Reasoning We as humans exercise something called motivated reasoning to reconcile

More information

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR READERS INFLUENCES HOW YOU SEE A PARTICULAR SITUATION DEFINE AN ISSUE EXPLAIN THE ONGOING

More information

Criticizing Arguments

Criticizing Arguments Kareem Khalifa Criticizing Arguments 1 Criticizing Arguments Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College Written August, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Step 1: Initial Evaluation

More information

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking. Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking. A good argument should: 1. be deductively valid (or inductively strong) and have all true premises; 2. have its validity and truth-of-premises be as evident

More information

Bellwork Friday November 18th

Bellwork Friday November 18th Bellwork Friday November 18th In your Writing Journal please respond to the following prompt: What is the most ridiculous argument you have heard? Remember this is NOT fight argument. I m talking trying

More information

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence. Inductive Logic Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence. An inductive leap is the intellectual movement from limited facts to a general conviction. The reliability

More information

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image Welcome to class Quick Write # 11 Create a narrative for the following image Day 17 Agenda Quick Write # 11 Peer editing Review Autobiographical Narrative reading Book Club presentations Peer Editing

More information

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall Stetson University Chapter 8 - Sentential ruth ables and Argument orms 8.1 Introduction he truth-value of a given truth-functional compound proposition depends

More information

FALLACIES IN GENERAL IRRELEVANCE AMBIGUITY UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTIONS. Informal Fallacies. PHIL UA-70: Logic. February 17 19, 2015

FALLACIES IN GENERAL IRRELEVANCE AMBIGUITY UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTIONS. Informal Fallacies. PHIL UA-70: Logic. February 17 19, 2015 Informal Fallacies PHIL UA-70: Logic February 17 19, 2015 OUTLINE FALLACIES IN GENERAL FALLACIES OF IRRELEVANCE FALLACIES INVOLVING AMBIGUITY FALLACIES INVOLVING UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTIONS OUTLINE FALLACIES

More information

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26 Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26 Session will discuss on how to refute arguments more effectively. Tim Cook Salado High School Tim.cook@saladoisd.org Attention All Attendees:

More information

Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: Jonathan Chan

Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: Jonathan Chan A03.1 Introduction Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: With valid arguments, it is impossible to have a false conclusion if the premises are all true. Obviously valid arguments play a very important

More information

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals Argument and Persuasion Stating Opinions and Proposals The Method It all starts with an opinion - something that people can agree or disagree with. The Method Move to action Speak your mind Convince someone

More information

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS Rhetorical Appeals Ethos Appeals to credibility Pathos Appeals to emotion Logos Appeals to logic Structure of an Analysis/Argument Arguments operate under logic Your

More information

Logic and Nosich s Elements

Logic and Nosich s Elements 1 Logic and Nosich s Elements Most of you have learned something about logical fallacies (PHG pp. 37-38, WA ch. 5, and many other sources). These are traps in making a point that disconnect or misuse the

More information

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 1 - Course Introduction: 1. What is Philosophy? 2. What is Ethics? 3. Logic a. Truth b. Arguments c. Validity d. Soundness What is Philosophy? The Three Fundamental Questions

More information

TOK FALLACIES Group 1: Clark Godwin, Kaleigh Rudge, David Fitzgerald, Maren Dorne, Thanh Pham

TOK FALLACIES Group 1: Clark Godwin, Kaleigh Rudge, David Fitzgerald, Maren Dorne, Thanh Pham TOK FALLACIES 2016 Group 1: Clark Godwin, Kaleigh Rudge, David Fitzgerald, Maren Dorne, Thanh Pham 1. Argument ad Ignorantum Definition: Concepts that have not been proven true or false but are used in

More information

Introducing Our New Faculty

Introducing Our New Faculty Dr. Isidoro Talavera Franklin University, Philosophy Ph.D. in Philosophy - Vanderbilt University M.A. in Philosophy - Vanderbilt University M.A. in Philosophy - University of Missouri M.S.E. in Math Education

More information

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 1. Demonstrate the importance of ethics as part of the persuasion process. 2. Identify and provide examples of eight common

More information

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) 1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by

More information

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

PHI 1700: Global Ethics PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 2 February 4th, 2016 All About Arguments (Philosophy Basics) 1 What is an argument? Arguments are like the currency of philosophy: they are what philosophers exchange to

More information

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012) LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012) Deductive Vs. Inductive If the conclusion is claimed to follow with strict certainty

More information

Those who doubt the writing is from the autistic children themselves, lack compassion, and should stay the hell out of our lives!

Those who doubt the writing is from the autistic children themselves, lack compassion, and should stay the hell out of our lives! Those who doubt the writing is from the autistic children themselves, lack compassion, and should stay the hell out of our lives! Ad misericordiam (appeal to pity) So many people have communicated with

More information

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111) Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111) Neils Bohr (1885 1962) to Einstein: You are not thinking. You are merely being logical. Reason is one of the four ways of knowing: Perception Language Emotion

More information

Weaknesses in arguments

Weaknesses in arguments Weaknesses in arguments Causal arguments post hoc Causal arguments will attempt to reach a conclusion by assuming that a strong cause is proof. Last year s summer was the hottest on record. Travel agents

More information

b) The meaning of "child" would need to be taken in the sense of age, as most people would find the idea of a young child going to jail as wrong.

b) The meaning of child would need to be taken in the sense of age, as most people would find the idea of a young child going to jail as wrong. Explanation for Question 1 in Quiz 8 by Norva Lo - Tuesday, 18 September 2012, 9:39 AM The following is the solution for Question 1 in Quiz 8: (a) Which term in the argument is being equivocated. (b) What

More information

Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B). Critical Thinking Exam 2: Chapter 3 PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS EXAM. Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B). 1. Valid arguments never have

More information

stage 2 Logic & Knowledge

stage 2 Logic & Knowledge stage 2 Logic & Knowledge What logic puts in order is the way we reason out. Logic makes explicit the rules of reasoning. Logical Inference Determining if an argument is valid or not is important, but

More information

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments ARGUMENTS Arguments arguments 1 Argument Worksheet 1. An argument is a collection of propositions with one proposition, the conclusion, following from the other propositions, the premises. Inference is

More information

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of: Logical Fallacies Continuing our foray into the world of Argument Courtesy of: http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.html What is Fallacy? Fallacies are defects that weaken arguments. First,

More information

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior. Logos Ethos Pathos Chapter 13 CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior. Persuasive speaking: process of doing so in

More information

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #1 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 2-7. Please write your answers clearly

More information

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen. Introduction PHI 244 Welcome to PHI 244, About Stephen Texts Course Requirements Syllabus Points of Interest Website http://seschmid.org, http://seschmid.org/teaching Email Policy 1 2 Argument Worksheet

More information

Friday April 22, 2011 Schedule for the Day

Friday April 22, 2011 Schedule for the Day riday April 22, 2011 Schedule for the Day Am: Critical Reasoning -- Comment s on riday s Assignment --Discussion of oday s Assignment --Workshop on new material: allacies involving emotion; table methods

More information

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University 2012 CONTENTS Part I Critical Thinking Chapter 1 Basic Training 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Logic, Propositions and Arguments 1.3 Deduction and Induction

More information

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 1 What Is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life CHAPTER SUMMARY Philosophy is a way of thinking that allows one to think more deeply about one s beliefs and about meaning in life. It

More information

24.09x Guide to Logic and Argumentation

24.09x Guide to Logic and Argumentation 24.09x Guide to Logic and Argumentation An argument in logic is not a quarrel or dispute; instead, it is a list of sentences. 1 The last sentence is the conclusion, and the other sentences are the premises.

More information

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan. Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Part-Whole Relations

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan. Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Part-Whole Relations CRITICAL THINKING Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan LECTURE 8! Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Part-Whole Relations Summary In this lecture, we will learn three more

More information

Critical Thinking Session Three. Fallacies I: Problems to do with the Source

Critical Thinking Session Three. Fallacies I: Problems to do with the Source Critical Thinking Session Three Fallacies I: Problems to do with the Source Rough Definition of Fallacy A Fallacy is a bad argument which may nonetheless be psychologically persuasive. Two Projects in

More information

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test In the Introduction, I stated that the basic underlying problem with forensic doctors is so easy to understand that even a twelve-year-old could understand

More information

All About Arguments. I. What is an Argument? II. Identifying an Author s Argument

All About Arguments. I. What is an Argument? II. Identifying an Author s Argument All About Arguments PHI 1700: Global Ethics I. What is an Argument? In philosophy, an argument is not a dispute or debate; rather, it is a structured defense of a claim (that is, a statement or assertion)

More information