The knowledge argument purports to show that there are non-physical facts facts that cannot be expressed in
|
|
- Valerie Chandler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Knowledge Argument Adam Vinueza Department of Philosophy, University of Colorado Keywords: acquaintance, fact, physicalism, proposition, qualia. The Knowledge Argument and Its Significance The Knowledge Argument in Historical Context Responses to the Knowledge Argument Conclusion The knowledge argument purports to show that there are non-physical facts facts that cannot be expressed in physical terms on the ground that one can know all the physical facts without knowing facts about what it is like to have an experience. Introduction The knowledge argument is against physicalism, the doctrine that all facts are physical facts. Physicalism is a notoriously difficult doctrine to state clearly and plausibly, but we can explicate its main idea by taking a physical fact to be a fact that can be expressed in the language of physics. Thus, to say that physicalism is true is to say that all facts can be expressed in the language of physics. The knowledge argument purports to show that there are facts about what it is like to have an experience, and that these facts cannot be expressed in the language of physics. What does it mean to say that there is something it is like to have an experience? If you have never tasted asparagus (or anything relevantly like it), you do not know what it is like to taste asparagus: there is a qualitative aspect to tasting asparagus that you have never experienced. Likewise, if you are an achromat, you have never had color experiences, so you do not know what it is like to have such experiences. These aspects of experience are called qualia (singular quale): there is a unique quale to tasting 1
2 asparagus, a distinct unique quale to seeing vermilion, and so on. Thus, the knowledge argument purports to show that certain facts about qualia cannot be expressed in the language of physics. The Knowledge Argument and Its Significance The knowledge argument (Jackson, 1982, 1986) is standardly introduced with the following thought experiment. Imagine that some person we shall call Mary has been confined from birth to a black-and-white room, and has been educated through black-and-white books and through lectures and discussions relayed on black-and-white television. Let us also imagine that Mary, in this room, has been taught all the physical facts: she has learned all the facts one can learn through studying physics, chemistry, neurophysiology, and so on, and that these theories are all complete and correct. Then if physicalism is true, Mary knows everything, because the physical facts are all the facts. But according to Jackson, Mary does not know everything, because if she were to leave her black-and-white environment she would see her first color: she would have her first experiences with color qualia, and would thereby come to know that is, learn what it is like to have color experiences. But if she knows all the physical facts before leaving the black-and-white room and learns what it is like to have color experiences upon leaving it, then what it is like to have color experiences is something Mary learns that is not a physical fact. So, according to Jackson, there are things one can know, some facts, that are not physical facts. If the knowledge argument is sound, physicalism is false. But physicalism is a methodological assumption that guides all scientific inquiry. We reject explanations that are inconsistent with physical explanations such as explanations of events by appeal to miracles on the ground that they are physically impossible, and it is arguable that the only way we can make sense of this dependence of all explanations on physical explanations is by supposing that all the facts, ultimately, are physical facts. Physicalism is of course also foundational for cognitive science, which is guided by the hypothesis that all features of our mental lives can be explained by appeal to functional (in particular, computational) processes. So if the knowledge argument is sound, the central hypothesis guiding cognitive science is simply false, and cognitive science is arguably misguided. That the knowledge argument has such powerful consequences can easily lead one to reject it out of hand: one might think that if it entails that physicalism is false, then the argument simply has to be unsound. But it is one thing to be convinced that it is unsound, and another to explain precisely where it goes wrong. In this article, we 2
3 will see the main ways philosophers have tried to show that the knowledge argument is unsound, and examine their virtues and faults. The Knowledge Argument in Historical Context The intuition motivating the knowledge argument goes back at least to Leibniz, who argued that mentality cannot be explained by appeal to physical principles. Leibniz imagined a machine that thinks and perceives, and claimed that if we looked inside, we would never see anything that could explain perceiving. (See Leibniz, 1981, pp ) Leibniz clearly had an intuition akin to the intuition that Mary would learn something upon seeing her first color: knowing all the physical properties of a thing, for Leibniz, does not tell one anything about what perceptions are like. Leibniz s intuition was almost universally accepted by philosophers from the seventeenth century until the middle of the twentieth century, when philosophical orthodoxy shifted from Cartesian dualism to materialism. While materialism is still the orthodox view, challenges to it arose in the past thirty years, mainly because of the sense many philosophers had that materialist explanations of mentality were deeply unsatisfying. This dissatisfaction had the same source that led Leibniz and others to reject materialism: materialist explanations seemed to them to be unable to capture the nature of qualia. A recent expression of this dissatisfaction, which just preceded the knowledge argument, is from Nagel (1974). Nagel argued that knowing all there is to know physically about the mechanisms underlying the echolocatory abilities of bats would not enable one to know what it is like for a bat to echolocate, because no one has any idea of what it is like for bats to echolocate. Nagel concluded that our abilities to explain qualia are limited by our abilities to conceive qualia, hence that the project of explaining mentality in physical terms is doomed to failure. Nagel s argument is often cited as a version of the knowledge argument, but it is important to note that its conclusion is weaker: Nagel concludes only that we can never know whether physicalism is true (because we cannot form a conception of all the phenomena we wish to explain), not that physicalism is false. Nevertheless, Nagel s argument is an important precursor to the knowledge argument, and is close kin to it in spirit. 3
4 Responses to the Knowledge Argument Let us see the knowledge argument more formally, so as to more easily classify responses to it: (1) Mary comes to know a fact about her experiences when she leaves her black-and-white environment viz., what it is like for her to see colors. (2) Mary s knowledge of what it is like to see colors is something she did not know before leaving her black-and-white environment. (3) If physicalism is true, then Mary s knowledge of what it is like to see colors is not a fact she did not know before leaving her black-and-white environment. (4) Therefore, physicalism is false. Premise (3) follows directly from physicalism plus the assumption that Mary knows all the physical facts, so the only premises that can be questioned are (1) and (2). Those who challenge the knowledge argument, then, do so in one of two ways: they deny that what Mary comes to know is a fact (premise (1)), or they deny that it is a fact she did not know before leaving her black-and-white environment (premise (2)). Let us call a response of the former sort a no-fact response; let us call one of the latter sort an old-fact response. Before looking at these responses, though, let us take a brief look at two initial responses many have been tempted to make, to see why they fail. The assumption that Mary knows all the physical facts is of course an implausible one: not only is it unlikely that we will ever be in a position to know all the physical facts (such as facts about physically inaccessible regions of the universe), but it is also unlikely that any one person could have the cognitive capacity to know even a tiny fraction of these facts. Thus, one tempting response is to conclude that it is this assumption that what is wrong with the knowledge argument. We should resist this temptation, however. No doubt the physical facts that constitute what it is like for Mary to have color experiences, if they exist, are knowable; so we may suppose that Mary knows only those facts (as well as whatever facts are necessary in order to know them), and the argument would still go through. The assumption that Mary knows all the physical facts is a harmless simplification. Another tempting response involves pointing out that we are often unable to draw conclusions that follow from what we know, either because doing so would involve too much time, or because the inferences are too complex for us to figure out. Thus, we might think that Mary really does know what it is like to have color experiences in virtue of knowing all the physical facts, but has simply been unable to draw the relevant inferences. 4
5 Unfortunately for this response, however, we could give Mary as much time and computational resources she would ever need to draw inferences from her knowledge, and she arguably still would not be able to infer what it is like to have color experiences. Intuitively, the only thing that would give her such knowledge is her having color experiences. So we cannot plausibly blame Mary s ignorance on her inability to draw inferences. No-Fact Responses No-fact responses themselves come in two forms. The most popular form is known as the ability hypothesis: the hypothesis that knowing what it is like to have an experience is not propositional knowledge (knowledge that something is the case), but instead merely know-how, the possession of an ability (Nemirow 1990; Lewis 1983, 1988; Churchland, 1985). The other form of no-fact response holds that knowing what it is like to have an experience is what Russell ( ) called knowledge by acquaintance, an intuitively immediate, nonpropositional awareness of a property (Conee 1990). The ability hypothesis holds that knowing what it is like to have an experience is knowing how to imagine and/or re-identify that experience. No doubt, knowing how to do many things involves factual knowledge: knowing how to drive a car requires knowing many facts about how the car works, for example. But one can know all the facts about cars without knowing how to drive a car. Given that Mary surely gains abilities when she leaves the black-and-white room among other things, she gains the ability to imagine and re-identify various new color experiences it is arguable that Mary s knowing what it is like to have an experience simply consists in her having those abilities. And because it is plausible that one cannot imagine or re-identify experiences one has never had, ability hypothesists can explain why Mary learns something upon leaving her black-and-white environment without having to deny physicalism, because what Mary acquires is not factual knowledge at all, but know-how. The ability hypothesis is controversial, not least because our best cognitive theories of know-how in general explain it as the possession of tacit factual knowledge: for example, our ability to produce and understand sentences of a natural language is paradigmatic know-how, but is arguably best explained in terms of tacit knowledge of a grammar for that language, a set of rules determining the grammatical structures of its sentences (Chomsky, 1965). Another argument against the ability hypothesis is a semantic one: the semantics of knows wh- constructions in general treats them as being true in virtue of the knower having factual knowledge. For example, to know where Tanzania is to know that it is at such-and-such a place, and to know why Smith murdered Jones is to 5
6 know that Smith murdered Jones for such-and-such a reason. By parity of reasoning, to know what it is like to have an experience is arguably to know that having that experience is like such-and-such (Lycan, 1996). And if semantics dictates that sentences of the form X knows what it is like to have experience E are true in virtue of the knower knowing that something is the case, then the ability hypothesis cannot be true. The acquaintance hypothesis holds that knowing what it is like to have an experience is to be acquainted with it, where knowledge by acquaintance is an intuitively immediate (viz., non-inferential) and non-propositional form of knowledge. Paradigms of acquaintance include the awareness we have of our own conscious mental states, and our perceptual awareness of colored patches in the visual field. Nemirow (1990) and Churchland (1985) offered versions of the acquaintance hypothesis, but analyzed acquiantance in terms of the possession of abilities; for this reason, many identify the acquaintance hypothesis with the ability hypothesis. Conee (1990) does not analyze acquaintance in this way, but does not say precisely what knowledge by acquaintance is. Unfortunately, the acquaintance hypothesis faces precisely objections analogous to those just given to the ability hypothesis. One can argue that acquaintance understood as perceptual awareness, at least is best characterized as awareness that something is the case, because perceptual awareness is typically characterized by cognitive scientists in computational terms in terms of rule-governed manipulations of mental representations and mental representations are typically characterized in this way. And Lycan s argument about the semantics of knows what it is like applies with equal force to the acquaintance hypothesis. Note that these objections to the ability and acquaintance hypotheses are not objections against either the view that knowing what it is like is an ability or the view that it is a kind of acquaintance; they are that knowing what it is like, whatever it is, is nevertheless a kind of factual knowledge. Thus, it is open to these theorists to revise their positions slightly, by accepting that knowing what it is like is a kind of factual knowledge, and that it is, under an unfamiliar guise, knowledge Mary already has. If they do so, however, they are offering a kind of old-fact response, not a no-fact response. It is to this sort of response that I now turn. Old-Fact Responses Old-fact responses hold that while Mary does come to know a fact when she leaves her black-and-white environment, this fact is just one of the facts she already knew. On certain views of facts, one can know the same fact in various ways: for example, one might think that the fact that Mark Twain is Mark Twain is identical to the 6
7 fact that Mark Twain is Samuel Clemens, even though one can know that Mark Twain is Mark Twain without knowing that Mark Twain is Samuel Clemens. Knowledge, arguably, is a relation between a knower and a true proposition, and true propositions are on certain views more plentiful than facts: different propositions can be true in virtue of the same facts holding. On this view, then, to learn a fact is to learn a proposition that is true in virtue of that fact holding; hence, one can learn the same fact in as many different ways as there are propositions corresponding to that fact. (Some hold that propositions and facts are the same sort of thing, but also that knowledge is a relation between knowers and guises of propositions, where guises bear a many-one relation to propositions. Because there is arguably only a verbal difference for our purposes between the view just described and this one, I will discuss only the former.) Old-fact responses are by far the most popular sort of response to the knowledge argument. (See, for example: Churchland, 1985; Bigelow and Pargetter, 1990; Loar, 1990; Lycan, 1990, 1995, and 1996; Pereboom 1994; and Tye, 1986.) The burden on those who make this sort of response is to make it plausible that what Mary learns is an old fact under the guise of a different proposition. This is standardly done by drawing analogies between Mary s situation and situations in which it is uncontroversial that someone comes to know a new proposition without learning any new facts. For example, suppose some person Bill knows that Mark Twain wrote Huckleberry Finn, but does not know that Mark Twain is a pseudonym for Samuel Clemens. When he learns that Samuel Clemens wrote Huckleberry Finn, it is plausible that this is no new fact for Bill, but simply one of the facts Bill already knows, under a different guise. (Bill may thereby learn that Mark Twain and Samuel Clemens are the same person, but the point is that while the two propositions about who wrote Huckleberry Finn are distinct, they correspond to a single fact.) If what Mary learns in learning what it is like (say) to see red is factual knowledge, then we may suppose that what Mary learns is that seeing red is like Q, where Q is the name of the quale Mary has when she sees red things. Therefore, on the old-fact view, Mary already knows that seeing red is like Q, only in virtue of her knowing a different proposition. How plausible is this? The holder of the old-fact view argues in the following way. Plausibly, the propositions that Mark Twain is Samuel Clemens and that Mark Twain is Mark Twain are distinct, yet the fact that Mark Twain is Samuel Clemens is the same fact as the fact that Mark Twain is Mark Twain; analogously, the propositions that seeing red is being in a certain physical state P and that seeing red is like Q are distinct, yet correspond to the same facts, because being in P just is being in a state like Q. 7
8 The main challenge for this sort of response derives from the standard explanation of not knowing a proposition while knowing the fact corresponding to it, viz., that one knows some but not all of a thing s properties. If someone knows that Mark Twain wrote Huckleberry Finn but not that Samuel Clemens did, that is arguably because there are some properties of Twain she does not realize he has viz., being named Samuel Clemens. But Mary is not in this position: if she knows all the physical facts and physicalism is true, she knows all the properties of every thing. This means that one who maintains an old-fact response must offer some other explanation of not knowing a proposition while knowing the fact corresponding to it. Appropriately old-fact theorists have offered a variety of alternative explanations. I will mention only the most prominent alternative, from Loar, 1990: that there are concepts whose possession requires having certain experiences, that some concepts of color qualia are like this, and that Mary has not had the experiences requisite for having such concepts of color qualia. These concepts, called phenomenal concepts, are concepts that enable one to recognize one s own qualia when one has them: they are those concepts in virtue of which one can self-ascribe sensations. (For related closely views see Lycan, 1995 and 1996, and Tye, 1986). If knowing what it is like to have an experience with quale Q is knowing that the experience is like Q, and the concepts of Q required for having this knowledge are phenomenal concepts, then old-fact theorists can explain why Mary does not know what it is like to have color experiences by pointing out that she lacks the requisite concepts, while denying that knowing what it is like to have experiences is knowledge of distinct facts. Interestingly, this sort of old-fact response leads to a different, though related worry. According to Leibniz s Law, if any thing X is identical to a thing Y, then whatever is true of X is true of Y. Leibniz s Law has implications for modal claims about identity claims about necessity and possibility. Because X is necessarily identical to X, it follows from Leibniz s Law that X is necessarily identical to Y. Nevertheless, many identities can seem to hold only contingently, because one can coherently conceive them to be false, and we need to do empirical investigation to find out whether they hold: the standard example is the identity of water and H 2 O. This would suggest that what we can coherently conceive is not a reliable guide to what is possible: water is necessarily identical to H 2 O, but we can coherently conceive that water is not H 2 O. But an influential argument from Kripke seems to show that these sorts of examples do not show that conceivability is no guide to possibility, and Kripke s argument for this leads to a real problem for old-fact responses. (Kripke, 1980; for further developments of this argument, see Chalmers, 1996 and Jackson, 1997.) 8
9 Kripke s argument is as follows. Because water is necessarily identical to H 2 O, there is no possible situation in which water is not H 2 O; therefore, when we claim to be able to conceive that water is not H 2 O, we are either not conceiving any situation at all, or what we are conceiving is something that we might legitimately confuse with this impossible situation. When we claim to be able to conceive that water is not H 2 O, Kripke argues, we are conceiving a situation in which something which has the properties we normally associate with water say, being a colorless, odorless potable liquid that flows in our rivers and streams is not H 2 O. This something would surely seem to be water, although it would not be (given that water is H 2 O). No doubt such a situation is possible, but it is not a situation in which water is not H 2 O, because the latter situation is impossible. Plausibly, we mistake that situation for the latter one; and this explains why it can seem possible that water is not H 2 O. We mistake a possibility in which something that seems to be water is not H 2 O for a possibility in which water is not H 2 O. Now, physicalists are committed to the view that certain physical properties are identical to qualia, and oldfact theorists claim that phenomenal concepts pick out the very same properties as certain physical concepts. Because these properties are identical, they are necessarily so; but because one can fail to realize that phenomenal concepts and physical concepts pick out the same properties, it may well seem to one that the properties picked out are not the same. Hence, it can seem possible that some physical property P is not identical to a quale Q, even if they are identical. Can we explain this seeming in the same way? Kripke argues that we cannot. The reason is that while there are situations in which something that seems to be water is not water, there is no situation in which something that seems to be a certain quale is not that quale. Whenever it seems to one, say, that one is in pain, Kripke argues, one is in pain; so we cannot say in this case that we are mistaking a possibility in which something that seems to be pain is not such-and-such a physical property for a possibility in which pain is not that physical property. If this is the correct explanation for why identities can seem contingent, old-fact theorists are left with being unable to explain why the identities of qualia with physical properties can seem contingent. And if they cannot explain this, one may legitimately suppose that the fact that we can coherently deny these identities means that they simply do not hold that is, that qualia are not physical properties, and physicalism is false. Of course, this argument is not Jackson s knowledge argument, but an important related one. Nevertheless, anyone who claims that Mary simply learns an old fact under a new guise when she comes to learn what it is like to have color experiences must have some response to it. The most current discussions of the knowledge argument tend focus on how such a response must go, and the main thrust has been to argue that we have independent reasons 9
10 for thinking that conceivability is no reliable guide to possibility: a good representative argument is from Yablo, Conclusion As yet, there is no decisive refutation of the knowledge argument. That there is no decisive refutation is of course no reason for theorists in cognitive science to reassess the import of their own research; but it should make them pause to think about the philosophical issues their research raises. It would be nice if we could simply dismiss the knowledge argument as a piece of fallacious reasoning, but we cannot. That it has survived all current attempts at refutation show that solving the mind-body problem calls not only for a good empirical theory of mind, but also for clear, careful thinking about such philosophical issues as the nature of facts and the epistemology of modal truths. References Bigelow, J and Pargetter, R (1994) Acquaintance with Qualia. Theoria 61: Chalmers, D (1996) The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chomsky, N (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Churchland, P (1985) Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States. Journal of Philosophy 82: Conee, E (1990) Phenomenal Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: Jackson, F (1982) Epiphenomenal Qualia. Philosophical Quarterly 32: Jackson, F (1986) What Mary Didn t Know. Journal of Philosophy 83: Kripke, S (1980) Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Leibniz, G (1981) New Essays on Human Understanding, Remnant, P and Bennett, J (trs). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lewis, D (1983) Postscript to Mad Pain and Martian Pain, In: Lewis, D, Philosophical Papers, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lewis, D (1988) What Experience Teaches. Proceedings of the Russellian Society. Sydney: University of Sydney Press. 10
11 Loar, B (1990) Phenomenal States. In: Tomberlin, J (ed) Philosophical Perspectives IV: Action Theory and the Philosophy of Mind: Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company. Lycan, W (1990) What is the Subjectivity of the Mental? In: Tomberlin, J (ed) Philosophical Perspectives IV: Action Theory and the Philosophy of Mind: Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company. Lycan, W (1995) A Limited Defense of Phenomenal Information. In: Metzinger, T (ed) Conscious Experience. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Lycan, W (1996) Consciousness and Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Nagel, T (1974) What Is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review 83: Nemirow, L (1990) Physicalism and the Cognitive Role of Acquaintance. In: Lycan, W (ed) Mind and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Pereboom, D (1994) Bats, Brain Scientists, and the Limitations of Introspection. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: Russell, B ( ) Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. Aristotelian Society Proceedings 11: Tye, M (1986) The Subjectivity of Experience. Mind 95: Yablo, S (1999) Textbook Kripkeanism and the Open Texture of Concepts. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 00:
Lecture 8 Property Dualism. Frank Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia and What Mary Didn t Know
Lecture 8 Property Dualism Frank Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia and What Mary Didn t Know 1 Agenda 1. Physicalism, Qualia, and Epiphenomenalism 2. Property Dualism 3. Thought Experiment 1: Fred 4. Thought
More informationThomas Nagel, "What is it Like to Be a Bat?", The Philosophical Review 83 (1974),
Bats, Brain Scientists, and the Limitations of Introspection Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1994), pp. 315-329 Derk Pereboom, University of Vermont Thomas Nagel and Frank Jackson have advanced
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF MIND (7AAN2061) SYLLABUS: SEMESTER 1
PHILOSOPHY OF MIND (7AAN2061) SYLLABUS: 2016-17 SEMESTER 1 Tutor: Prof Matthew Soteriou Office: 604 Email: matthew.soteriou@kcl.ac.uk Consultations Hours: Tuesdays 11am to 12pm, and Thursdays 3-4pm. Lecture
More informationExperiences Don t Sum
Philip Goff Experiences Don t Sum According to Galen Strawson, there could be no such thing as brute emergence. If weallow thatcertain x s can emergefromcertain y s in a way that is unintelligible, even
More informationThe Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 83, No. 5. (May, 1986), pp
What Mary Didn't Know Frank Jackson The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 83, No. 5. (May, 1986), pp. 291-295. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-362x%28198605%2983%3a5%3c291%3awmdk%3e2.0.co%3b2-z
More informationThe readings for the course are separated into the following two categories:
PHILOSOPHY OF MIND (5AANB012) Tutor: Dr. Matthew Parrott Office: 603 Philosophy Building Email: matthew.parrott@kcl.ac.uk Consultation Hours: Thursday 1:30-2:30 pm & 4-5 pm Lecture Hours: Thursday 3-4
More informationBOOK REVIEWS. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 111, No. 4 (October 2002)
The Philosophical Review, Vol. 111, No. 4 (October 2002) John Perry, Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001. Pp. xvi, 221. In this lucid, deep, and entertaining book (based
More informationTHE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE
Diametros nr 29 (wrzesień 2011): 80-92 THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE Karol Polcyn 1. PRELIMINARIES Chalmers articulates his argument in terms of two-dimensional
More informationProperty Dualism and the Knowledge Argument: Are Qualia Really a Problem for Physicalism? Ronald Planer Rutgers Univerity
Property Dualism and the Knowledge Argument: Are Qualia Really a Problem for Physicalism? Ronald Planer Rutgers Univerity Abstract: Where does the mind fit into the physical world? Not surprisingly, philosophers
More informationON TWO ALLEGED CONFLICTS BETWEEN DIVINE ATTRIBUTES. Torin Alter. God from being afraid and having evil desires and thus from understanding such
ON TWO ALLEGED CONFLICTS BETWEEN DIVINE ATTRIBUTES (Faith and Philosophy 19, 1, 47-57) Torin Alter [ABSTRACT] Some argue that God s omnipotence and moral perfection prevent God from being afraid and having
More informationFormative Assessment: 2 x 1,500 word essays First essay due 16:00 on Friday 30 October 2015 Second essay due: 16:00 on Friday 11 December 2015
PHILOSOPHY OF MIND: FALL 2015 (5AANB012) Credits: 15 units Tutor: Dr. Matthew Parrott Office: 603 Philosophy Building Email: matthew.parrott@kcl.ac.uk Consultation Hours: Tuesday 5-6 & Wednesday 3:30-4:30
More informationFrank Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia
Frank Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia The following is excerpted from Frank Jackson s article Epiphenomenal Qualia published in Philosophical Quarterly in 1982, and his article What Mary Didn t Know published
More informationThinking About Consciousness
774 Book Reviews rates most efficiently from each other the complexity of what there is in Jean- Jacques Rousseau s text, and the process by which the reader has encountered it. In a most original and
More informationPlease remember to sign-in by scanning your badge Department of Psychiatry Grand Rounds
AS A COURTESY TO OUR SPEAKER AND AUDIENCE MEMBERS, PLEASE SILENCE ALL PAGERS AND CELL PHONES Please remember to sign-in by scanning your badge Department of Psychiatry Grand Rounds James M. Stedman, PhD.
More informationVarieties of Apriority
S E V E N T H E X C U R S U S Varieties of Apriority T he notions of a priori knowledge and justification play a central role in this work. There are many ways in which one can understand the a priori,
More informationReview of Torin Alter and Sven Walter (eds.) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism
Review of Torin Alter and Sven Walter (eds.) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism James Trafford University of East London jamestrafford1@googlemail.com
More informationthe aim is to specify the structure of the world in the form of certain basic truths from which all truths can be derived. (xviii)
PHIL 5983: Naturalness and Fundamentality Seminar Prof. Funkhouser Spring 2017 Week 8: Chalmers, Constructing the World Notes (Introduction, Chapters 1-2) Introduction * We are introduced to the ideas
More informationMinds and Machines spring The explanatory gap and Kripke s argument revisited spring 03
Minds and Machines spring 2003 The explanatory gap and Kripke s argument revisited 1 preliminaries handouts on the knowledge argument and qualia on the website 2 Materialism and qualia: the explanatory
More informationINTRODUCTION THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
GENERAL PHILOSOPHY WEEK 5: MIND & BODY JONNY MCINTOSH INTRODUCTION Last week: The Mind-Body Problem(s) Introduced Descartes's Argument from Doubt This week: Descartes's Epistemological Argument Frank Jackson's
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 D A Y 2 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 D A Y 2 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism
More informationWhat is Physicalism? Meet Mary the Omniscient Scientist
What is Physicalism? Jackson (1986): Physicalism is not the noncontroversial thesis that the actual world is largely physical, but the challenging thesis that it is entirely physical. This is why physicalists
More information24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI
24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI free will again summary final exam info Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. 24.09 F11 1 the first part of the incompatibilist argument Image removed due to copyright
More informationThe Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia
Francesca Hovagimian Philosophy of Psychology Professor Dinishak 5 March 2016 The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia In his essay Epiphenomenal Qualia, Frank Jackson makes the case
More informationTHE NATURE OF MIND Oxford University Press. Table of Contents
THE NATURE OF MIND Oxford University Press Table of Contents General I. Problems about Mind A. Mind as Consciousness 1. Descartes, Meditation II, selections from Meditations VI and Fourth Objections and
More informationSubjective Character and Reflexive Content
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXVIII, No. 1, January 2004 Subjective Character and Reflexive Content DAVID M. ROSENTHAL City University of New York Graduate Center Philosophy and Cognitive
More informationTHE TROUBLE WITH MARY
Blackwell Oxford, PAPQ Pacific 0031-5621 December 84 41000 Original THE PACIFIC 2003 TROUBLE Philosophical University UK Article PHILOSOPHICAL Publishing 2003 WITH of Quarterly Southern LtdMARY QUARTERLY
More informationTony Chadwick Essay Prize 2006 Winner Can we Save Qualia? (Thomas Nagel and the Psychophysical Nexus ) By Eileen Walker
Tony Chadwick Essay Prize 2006 Winner Can we Save Qualia? (Thomas Nagel and the Psychophysical Nexus ) By Eileen Walker 1. Introduction: The problem of causal exclusion If our minds are part of the physical
More informationPhysicalism and Conceptual Analysis * Esa Díaz-León.
Physicalism and Conceptual Analysis * Esa Díaz-León pip01ed@sheffield.ac.uk Physicalism is a widely held claim about the nature of the world. But, as it happens, it also has its detractors. The first step
More informationThe knowledge argument
Michael Lacewing The knowledge argument PROPERTY DUALISM Property dualism is the view that, although there is just one kind of substance, physical substance, there are two fundamentally different kinds
More informationWhat is consciousness? Although it is possible to offer
Aporia vol. 26 no. 2 2016 Objects of Perception and Dependence Introduction What is consciousness? Although it is possible to offer explanations of consciousness in terms of the physical, some of the important
More informationA copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge
Leuenberger, S. (2012) Review of David Chalmers, The Character of Consciousness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90 (4). pp. 803-806. ISSN 0004-8402 Copyright 2013 Taylor & Francis A copy can be downloaded
More informationHigher-Order Approaches to Consciousness and the Regress Problem
Higher-Order Approaches to Consciousness and the Regress Problem Paul Bernier Département de philosophie Université de Moncton Moncton, NB E1A 3E9 CANADA Keywords: Consciousness, higher-order theories
More informationDECONSTRUCTING NEW WAVE MATERIALISM
In C. Gillett & B. Loewer, eds., Physicalism and Its Discontents (Cambridge University Press, 2001) DECONSTRUCTING NEW WAVE MATERIALISM Terence Horgan and John Tienson University of Memphis. In the first
More informationBonJour Against Materialism. Just an intellectual bandwagon?
BonJour Against Materialism Just an intellectual bandwagon? What is physicalism/materialism? materialist (or physicalist) views: views that hold that mental states are entirely material or physical in
More informationIN THIS PAPER I will examine and criticize the arguments David
A MATERIALIST RESPONSE TO DAVID CHALMERS THE CONSCIOUS MIND PAUL RAYMORE Stanford University IN THIS PAPER I will examine and criticize the arguments David Chalmers gives for rejecting a materialistic
More informationA Philosophical Critique of Cognitive Psychology s Definition of the Person
A Philosophical Critique of Cognitive Psychology s Definition of the Person Rosa Turrisi Fuller The Pluralist, Volume 4, Number 1, Spring 2009, pp. 93-99 (Article) Published by University of Illinois Press
More informationAustralasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 73, No. 1; March 1995
Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 73, No. 1; March 1995 SHOULD A MATERIALIST BELIEVE IN QUALIA? David Lewis Should a materialist believe in qualia? Yes and no. 'Qualia' is a name for the occupants
More informationRealism and instrumentalism
Published in H. Pashler (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of the Mind (2013), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 633 636 doi:10.4135/9781452257044 mark.sprevak@ed.ac.uk Realism and instrumentalism Mark Sprevak
More informationSUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION
SUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION Stewart COHEN ABSTRACT: James Van Cleve raises some objections to my attempt to solve the bootstrapping problem for what I call basic justification
More informationChalmers, "Consciousness and Its Place in Nature"
http://www.protevi.com/john/philmind Classroom use only. Chalmers, "Consciousness and Its Place in Nature" 1. Intro 2. The easy problem and the hard problem 3. The typology a. Reductive Materialism i.
More informationPLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:
This article was downloaded by: [University of Nevada Las Vegas] On: 10 January 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 908759753] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England
More informationThe modal status of materialism
Philos Stud (2009) 145:351 362 DOI 10.1007/s11098-008-9235-z The modal status of materialism Joseph Levine Æ Kelly Trogdon Published online: 10 May 2008 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Abstract
More informationPhilosophical Zombies Don t Share Our Epistemic Situation. John Curtis Wright
Philosophical Zombies Don t Share Our Epistemic Situation John Curtis Wright Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationZombie-Mary and the Blue Banana On the Compatibility of the 'Knowledge Argument' with the Argument from Modality
Zombie-Mary and the Blue Banana On the Compatibility of the 'Knowledge Argument' with the Argument from Modality Tillmann Vierkant Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research Amalienstr.33 80799 Munich
More informationDirect Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000)
Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000) One of the advantages traditionally claimed for direct realist theories of perception over indirect realist theories is that the
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism (continued)
More informationSkepticism and Internalism
Skepticism and Internalism John Greco Abstract: This paper explores a familiar skeptical problematic and considers some strategies for responding to it. Section 1 reconstructs and disambiguates the skeptical
More informationPurple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness
Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation As Published Publisher Levine, Joseph.
More informationSaul Kripke, Naming and Necessity
24.09x Minds and Machines Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity Excerpt from Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity (Harvard, 1980). Identity theorists have been concerned with several distinct types of identifications:
More informationKNOWING WHERE WE ARE, AND WHAT IT IS LIKE Robert Stalnaker
KNOWING WHERE WE ARE, AND WHAT IT IS LIKE Robert Stalnaker [This is work in progress - notes and references are incomplete or missing. The same may be true of some of the arguments] I am going to start
More informationPerception and Mind-Dependence: Lecture 2
1 Recap Perception and Mind-Dependence: Lecture 2 (Alex Moran, apm60@ cam.ac.uk) According to naïve realism: (1) the objects of perception are ordinary, mindindependent things, and (2) perceptual experience
More informationIs there a distinction between a priori and a posteriori
Lingnan University Digital Commons @ Lingnan University Theses & Dissertations Department of Philosophy 2014 Is there a distinction between a priori and a posteriori Hiu Man CHAN Follow this and additional
More informationConsciousness Without Awareness
Consciousness Without Awareness Eric Saidel Department of Philosophy Box 43770 University of Southwestern Louisiana Lafayette, LA 70504-3770 USA saidel@usl.edu Copyright (c) Eric Saidel 1999 PSYCHE, 5(16),
More informationThere are two explanatory gaps. Dr Tom McClelland University of Glasgow
There are two explanatory gaps Dr Tom McClelland University of Glasgow 1 THERE ARE TWO EXPLANATORY GAPS ABSTRACT The explanatory gap between the physical and the phenomenal is at the heart of the Problem
More informationPhilosophy of Mind. Introduction to the Mind-Body Problem
Philosophy of Mind Introduction to the Mind-Body Problem Two Motivations for Dualism External Theism Internal The nature of mind is such that it has no home in the natural world. Mind and its Place in
More informationIn Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationWHAT DOES KRIPKE MEAN BY A PRIORI?
Diametros nr 28 (czerwiec 2011): 1-7 WHAT DOES KRIPKE MEAN BY A PRIORI? Pierre Baumann In Naming and Necessity (1980), Kripke stressed the importance of distinguishing three different pairs of notions:
More informationPHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS. Methods that Metaphysicians Use
PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS Methods that Metaphysicians Use Method 1: The appeal to what one can imagine where imagining some state of affairs involves forming a vivid image of that state of affairs.
More information24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI
24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI more on the knowledge argument Nagel on bats 1 resisting the knowledge argument 1. imprisoned Mary knows all the physical facts, hence: 2. if physicalism is true,
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationThe Mind/Body Problem
The Mind/Body Problem This book briefly explains the problem of explaining consciousness and three proposals for how to do it. Site: HCC Eagle Online Course: 6143-PHIL-1301-Introduction to Philosophy-S8B-13971
More informationPhenomenal Indeterminacy and the Bounds of Cognition 1
Phenomenal Indeterminacy and the Bounds of Cognition 1 Brian Fiala Philosophy Program The University of Arizona fiala at email dot arizona dot edu Many contemporary metaphysicians of mind consider the
More informationSeeing Through The Veil of Perception *
Seeing Through The Veil of Perception * Abstract Suppose our visual experiences immediately justify some of our beliefs about the external world, that is, justify them in a way that does not rely on our
More informationTheories of the mind have been celebrating their new-found freedom to study
The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates edited by Ned Block, Owen Flanagan and Güven Güzeldere Cambridge: Mass.: MIT Press 1997 pp.xxix + 843 Theories of the mind have been celebrating their
More informationGrounding and Analyticity. David Chalmers
Grounding and Analyticity David Chalmers Interlevel Metaphysics Interlevel metaphysics: how the macro relates to the micro how nonfundamental levels relate to fundamental levels Grounding Triumphalism
More informationBOOK REVIEWS. Duke University. The Philosophical Review, Vol. XCVII, No. 1 (January 1988)
manner that provokes the student into careful and critical thought on these issues, then this book certainly gets that job done. On the other hand, one likes to think (imagine or hope) that the very best
More informationKripke on the distinctness of the mind from the body
Kripke on the distinctness of the mind from the body Jeff Speaks April 13, 2005 At pp. 144 ff., Kripke turns his attention to the mind-body problem. The discussion here brings to bear many of the results
More informationPaul Raymont Published in Journal of Philosophical Research, XXIV (1999):
1 Paul Raymont (paulraymont@trentu.ca, paulraymont@hotmail.com) Published in Journal of Philosophical Research, XXIV (1999): 113-26. The Know-How Response to Jackson's Knowledge Argument ABSTRACT I defend
More informationBehavior and Other Minds: A Response to Functionalists
Behavior and Other Minds: A Response to Functionalists MIKE LOCKHART Functionalists argue that the "problem of other minds" has a simple solution, namely, that one can ath'ibute mentality to an object
More informationConsciousness, Theories of
Philosophy Compass 1/1 (2006): 58 64, 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00008.x Consciousness, Theories of Uriah Kriegel University of Arizona/University of Sydney Abstract Phenomenal consciousness is the property
More informationNOT SO EPIPHENOMENAL QUALIA HOW MUCH OF A MYSTERY IS THE MIND? Fredrik Stjernberg
NOT SO EPIPHENOMENAL QUALIA OR HOW MUCH OF A MYSTERY IS THE MIND? Fredrik Stjernberg VŠxjš University In recent philosophy of mind, physicalism - in one form or another - has been the dominant position.
More informationThe Phenomenal Concept Strategy
Peter Carruthers and Bénédicte Veillet 1 The Phenomenal Concept Strategy A powerful reply to a range of familiar anti-physicalist arguments has recently been developed. According to this reply, our possession
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College. Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics Scepticism, and the Mind 2 Last Time we looked at scepticism about INDUCTION. This Lecture will move on to SCEPTICISM
More informationMachine Consciousness, Mind & Consciousness
Machine Consciousness, Mind & Consciousness Rajakishore Nath 1 Abstract. The problem of consciousness is one of the most important problems in science as well as in philosophy. There are different philosophers
More informationDavid Chalmers on Mind and Consciousness Richard Brown Forthcoming in Andrew Bailey (ed) Philosophy of Mind: The Key Thinkers.
David Chalmers on Mind and Consciousness Richard Brown Forthcoming in Andrew Bailey (ed) Philosophy of Mind: The Key Thinkers. Continuum Press David Chalmers is perhaps best known for his argument against
More informationspring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7
24.500 spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7 teatime self-knowledge 24.500 S05 1 plan self-blindness, one more time Peacocke & Co. immunity to error through misidentification: Shoemaker s self-reference
More information2002. The Knowledge Argument Against Dualism, Theoria Vol. LXIII, pp The Knowledge Argument Against Dualism YUJIN NAGASAWA
2002. The Knowledge Argument Against Dualism, Theoria Vol. LXIII, pp. 205-223. The Knowledge Argument Against Dualism by YUJIN NAGASAWA Australian National University Abstract Paul Churchland argues that
More informationThe Department of Philosophy and Classics The University of Texas at San Antonio One UTSA Circle San Antonio, TX USA.
CLAYTON LITTLEJOHN ON THE COHERENCE OF INVERSION The Department of Philosophy and Classics The University of Texas at San Antonio One UTSA Circle San Antonio, TX 78249 USA cmlittlejohn@yahoo.com 1 ON THE
More informationJackson opens his essay with a definition: It is undeniable that the physical, chemical and biological sciences have provided a great deal of
Jackson opens his essay with a definition: It is undeniable that the physical, chemical and biological sciences have provided a great deal of information about the world we live in and about ourselves.
More informationReview of David J. Chalmers Constructing the World (OUP 2012) David Chalmers burst onto the philosophical scene in the mid-1990s with his work on
Review of David J. Chalmers Constructing the World (OUP 2012) Thomas W. Polger, University of Cincinnati 1. Introduction David Chalmers burst onto the philosophical scene in the mid-1990s with his work
More informationUnit VI: Davidson and the interpretational approach to thought and language
Unit VI: Davidson and the interpretational approach to thought and language October 29, 2003 1 Davidson s interdependence thesis..................... 1 2 Davidson s arguments for interdependence................
More informationMary and the Philosophical Goose Chase: Physicalism and the Knowledge Argument
SAMUEL MICHAELIDES ISFP FELLOWSHIP DISSERTATION Mary and the Philosophical Goose Chase: Physicalism and the Knowledge Argument Introduction 0.1 In his paper Epiphenomenal Qualia, Frank Jackson introduces
More informationOvercoming Cartesian Intuitions: A Defense of Type-Physicalism
Indiana Undergraduate Journal of Cognitive Science 4 (2009) 81-96 Copyright 2009 IUJCS. All rights reserved Overcoming Cartesian Intuitions: A Defense of Type-Physicalism Ronald J. Planer Rutgers University
More informationThe UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters!
Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies., Please cite the published version when available. Title Zombies and their possibilities Authors(s)
More informationPhilosophy 5340 Epistemology. Topic 6: Theories of Justification: Foundationalism versus Coherentism. Part 2: Susan Haack s Foundherentist Approach
Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 6: Theories of Justification: Foundationalism versus Coherentism Part 2: Susan Haack s Foundherentist Approach Susan Haack, "A Foundherentist Theory of Empirical Justification"
More informationCOULD WE EXPERIENCE THE PASSAGE OF TIME? Simon Prosser
Ratio, 20.1 (2007), 75-90. Reprinted in L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), Philosophy of Time: Critical Concepts in Philosophy. New York/London: Routledge, 2008. COULD WE EXPERIENCE THE PASSAGE OF TIME? Simon
More informationOn the hard problem of consciousness: Why is physics not enough?
On the hard problem of consciousness: Why is physics not enough? Hrvoje Nikolić Theoretical Physics Division, Rudjer Bošković Institute, P.O.B. 180, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia e-mail: hnikolic@irb.hr Abstract
More informationMetaphysics & Consciousness. A talk by Larry Muhlstein
Metaphysics & Consciousness A talk by Larry Muhlstein A brief note on philosophy It is about thinking So think about what I am saying and ask me questions And go home and think some more For self improvement
More informationMinds and Machines spring Hill and Nagel on the appearance of contingency, contd spring 03
Minds and Machines spring 2003 Hill and Nagel on the appearance of contingency, contd. 1 can the physicalist credibly deny (1)? 1. If I can clearly and distinctly conceive a proposition p to be true, then
More informationCraig on the Experience of Tense
Craig on the Experience of Tense In his recent book, The Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination, 1 William Lane Craig offers several criticisms of my views on our experience of time. The purpose
More informationClassical Theory of Concepts
Classical Theory of Concepts The classical theory of concepts is the view that at least for the ordinary concepts, a subject who possesses a concept knows the necessary and sufficient conditions for falling
More informationExternalism and a priori knowledge of the world: Why privileged access is not the issue Maria Lasonen-Aarnio
Externalism and a priori knowledge of the world: Why privileged access is not the issue Maria Lasonen-Aarnio This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2006), Externalism
More informationUnnecessary Existents. Joshua Spencer University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Unnecessary Existents Joshua Spencer University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 1. Introduction Let s begin by looking at an argument recently defended by Timothy Williamson (2002). It consists of three premises.
More informationReply to Kirk and Melnyk
SWIF Philosophy of Mind, 09 May 2003 http://www.swif.uniba.it/lei/mind/forums/papineau.htm Forums Forum 4 Reply to Kirk and Melnyk David Papineau Department of Philosophy King's College London I am lucky
More informationSensitivity has Multiple Heterogeneity Problems: a Reply to Wallbridge. Guido Melchior. Philosophia Philosophical Quarterly of Israel ISSN
Sensitivity has Multiple Heterogeneity Problems: a Reply to Wallbridge Guido Melchior Philosophia Philosophical Quarterly of Israel ISSN 0048-3893 Philosophia DOI 10.1007/s11406-017-9873-5 1 23 Your article
More informationBuck-Passers Negative Thesis
Mark Schroeder November 27, 2006 University of Southern California Buck-Passers Negative Thesis [B]eing valuable is not a property that provides us with reasons. Rather, to call something valuable is to
More informationPhilosophy of Mind for Honours, Masters, and PhD Students
Philosophy of Mind for Honours, Masters, and PhD Students This course focuses on three interconnected problem areas related to conscious experiences, that have each been the focus of significant recent
More informationLecture 4. Before beginning the present lecture, I should give the solution to the homework problem
1 Lecture 4 Before beginning the present lecture, I should give the solution to the homework problem posed in the last lecture: how, within the framework of coordinated content, might we define the notion
More informationRevelation, Humility, and the Structure of the World. David J. Chalmers
Revelation, Humility, and the Structure of the World David J. Chalmers Revelation and Humility Revelation holds for a property P iff Possessing the concept of P enables us to know what property P is Humility
More informationSKEPTICISM, ABDUCTIVISM, AND THE EXPLANATORY GAP. Ram Neta University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Philosophical Issues, 14, Epistemology, 2004 SKEPTICISM, ABDUCTIVISM, AND THE EXPLANATORY GAP Ram Neta University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill I. Introduction:The Skeptical Problem and its Proposed Abductivist
More information