Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 24 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 45 - Page ID#: 490

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 24 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 45 - Page ID#: 490"

Transcription

1 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. :0-CV-00-KSF DEPOSITION OF JAMES KRUPA, Ph.D. C. MARTIN GASKELL PLAINTIFF v. UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY DEFENDANT The deposition of JAMES KRUPA, Ph.D., was taken on behalf of the plaintiff before Ann Hutchison, Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Kentucky at Large, at the law office of Baker, Kriz, Jenkins, Prewitt & Jones, PSC, 0 West Vine Street, Suite, Lexington, Kentucky, on Wednesday, March,, beginning at the hour of : p.m. The deposition was taken by notice and shall be used for any and all purposes allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including use at trial. ACTION COURT REPORTERS North Mill Street Lexington, Kentucky 00 () -00

2 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: APPEARANCES COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Francis J. Manion Geoffrey R. Surtees American Center for Law & Justice-Kentucky New Hope Road P.O. Box 0 New Hope, Kentucky 00 COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT: Barbara A. Kriz Baker Kriz Jenkins Prewitt & Jones, PSC 0 West Vine Street, Suite Lexington, Kentucky 00 ALSO PRESENT: Dr. Michael Cavagnero ACTION COURT REPORTERS

3 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: INDEX DEPONENT: JAMES KRUPA, Ph.D. PAGE EXAMINATION BY: Mr. Surtees... REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE... EXHIBITS NO. DESCRIPTION IDENTIFIED Modern Astronomy, the Bible, and Creation //0 to Dr. Krupa from Dr. Cavagnero (Above-referenced exhibits accompany original and copy transcripts.) ACTION COURT REPORTERS

4 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: JAMES KRUPA, Ph.D. having been first duly placed under oath, was examined and testified as follows: EXAMINATION BY MR. SURTEES: Q. Would you state your name for the record, please. A. James Krupa. Q. Dr. Krupa, my name is Geoffrey Surtees. I'm one of Martin Gaskell's attorneys in this lawsuit currently pending against the University of Kentucky -- A. Uh-huh. Q. -- here in the Eastern District of Kentucky. Have you ever had your deposition taken before? A. No. Haven't. Q. Okay. I'm sure you've been advised as to what the deposition process is all about. A. Uh-huh. Q. It's a very straightforward affair. A. Uh-huh. Q. I ask you questions and you respond with the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. A. Uh-huh. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

5 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: Q. Because the court reporter is taking down everything we say, it is important that we not speak over one another. A. Okay. Q. You let me finish my question before you respond, and I'll let you finish your response before I ask another question. A. That'll be challenging for me, but I'll do my best. Q. Okay. That's fine. MR. MANION: That seems to be the case for him too. MS. KRIZ: And no uh-huhs. Q. That's right. Everything has to be spoken out loud, so you'll have to refrain from uh-huhs and huh-uhs. And so yes and no. Any question? A. It's a whole behavioral shift for me. Notice even then it was a bit of a challenge, but I'll work on it. Q. Maybe by the end we'll be all set. A. Okay. Q. But this is a challenge for everyone including the lawyers. Dr. Krupa, this is not going to take long at all this afternoon, but if at any time you need to ACTION COURT REPORTERS

6 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: take a break just feel free to ask and we will accommodate you. That is no problem. Are you currently on any medication that you think might interfere with your ability to understand my questions and give me truthful answers here today? A. I do not think so. Q. With whom did you speak regarding your deposition here today, if anyone? A. With Barbara. Last Tuesday, was it? Yeah. Q. Did you speak with anyone else regarding today's deposition? A. Oh, that I had a deposition this afternoon, yeah. Q. Did you speak with Dr. Steiner? A. I said I'll see you later today or something to that effect. I passed him in the hall. Q. Did you see Dr. Steiner this afternoon, or today? A. No. Let's see. It would have been probably sometime earlier this morning. Q. Oh, okay. Did you consult any documents in preparation for today's deposition? A. I have the document that Dr. Gaskell ACTION COURT REPORTERS

7 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: released at -- the astronomy/religion document. That's the extent of it. Q. Okay. And any other documents that you brought with you here today? A. Just a few old s, or maybe I didn't bring it. A couple of s from -- or one of the s from back in 0. Q. Okay. Great. And you produced these documents on your own from your own computer; is that correct? A. Yeah, uh-huh. Q. And any of the writings is all your writing; is that correct? A. Yeah. Yes. MR. SURTEES: Barbara, can we get copies of these here? MS. KRIZ: Yeah. The s, I wasn't sure if you have the actual s. THE WITNESS: This that you sent? MS. KRIZ: Right. THE WITNESS: How to get here today and this. MR. MANION: We'll check out her directions. MS. KRIZ: I'm not going to let you ACTION COURT REPORTERS

8 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: see what I sent to him. MR. SURTEES: That's fine. But I would like to get copies -- actually I'd like to get them now if possible. MS. KRIZ: Okay. MR. SURTEES: Except for anything between the two of you. MS. KRIZ: Yeah. Not from me, but I'll make copies of these. MR. SURTEES: And we'll just go off the record for a second. (Off the record.) Q. Doctor, other than writing the word "rubbish" on a document, which we will mark right now actually -- (Exhibit No. marked.) Q. -- did you make any notes in preparation for today's deposition? A. I did not. Q. Dr. Krupa, could you just give me a -- summarize for me your educational background. A. I have a bachelor's degree from the University of Nebraska at Omaha. I have a master's from the University of Nebraska. I have a Ph.D. from the University of Oklahoma. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

9 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: Q. And your professional background as far as teaching and research and publications? A. Oh, my areas are evolution, ecology and animal behavior and some pedagogy. Q. Okay. And where have you taught? A. Well, as a tenure track faculty member here at the University of Kentucky. I was a teaching assistant at University of Nebraska Omaha and University of Oklahoma. Q. I want to -- well let's go ahead and identify Exhibit No.. What is Exhibit No., Dr. Krupa? A. Oh. Q. Yeah, that thing we just marked. A. That is the document Modern Astronomy, the Bible, and Creation, by Martin Gaskell. Q. Okay. When was the first time you saw that document? A. Oh, would have been back in 0, October 0. Q. Okay. And how did you come to find that document? A. Dr. Osborn forwarded it to me. Q. And let's just go ahead and identify that. Take a look at what we've marked Exhibit Osborn. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

10 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: A. Okay. Q. Is that the that Dr. Osborn forwarded to you from Dr. Cavagnero? I'm sorry, just the first page. A. Oh, okay. Yes. Q. So just the first page of Exhibit is what Dr. Osborn forwarded to you. Correct? A. Uh-huh. Yes. Q. And then from that you went to that website; is that correct? A. If I recall, yes. Q. And the website that is set out in Exhibit Osborn is Exhibit Krupa; is that correct? A. Yes. Q. Okay. Prior to receiving that from Dr. Osborn, had you ever heard of Dr. Martin Gaskell before? A. I did. Q. Okay. And in what connection? A. He gave a lecture in Memorial Hall sometime in the mid '0s. Q. If I told you in -- that the lecture took place in, would you have -- A. That would make sense. Q. Okay. And do you know who invited Dr. -- ACTION COURT REPORTERS

11 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 00 got to wait for me to finish my question. You were about to do it. Do you know who invited Dr. Gaskell to give that lecture in at Memorial Hall at the University of Kentucky? A. Well, it's been so long ago. I assume the physics department. Q. Okay. Why do you assume the physics department? A. I'm not sure what other department would invite an astronomer. Q. Okay. And do you know whether or not he was invited to give a lecture on a particular topic or whether or not he was invited to just give the lecture and to lecture about whatever he wanted? Do you know how the subject of his lecture came about? A. I do not know, but the advertisement, which is of great interest to me, it was a lecture on how science and religion can go hand and hand. The specific title I do not recall. Q. And do you know whether or not it was that subject that Dr. Gaskell was asked to lecture on, or do you know whether or not that was Dr. Gaskell's idea to lecture on that? A. Have no idea. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

12 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 Q. Okay. And you said the advertisement was of great interest to you? A. Yes. Q. Why? A. I am very interested in science, science education. I'm very concerned about the antiscience attitude in this country, and anybody who can talk to us about how it is that whatever reason people fear science or reject science, if they can help us alleviate that problem, I'm very much interested in the topic. Q. And prior to that lecture -- which you attended. Correct? A. (Witness nods head.) Q. Prior to that lecture did you speak to anyone about that lecture in the physics department, for example? A. I did not. Q. Did you speak with anyone in the biology department about the forthcoming lecture? A. Yes. I encouraged graduate students to attend the talk. Q. Okay. Did you speak with any other faculty members about that lecture? A. I don't recall. Q. And you went to the lecture. Correct? ACTION COURT REPORTERS

13 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 A. Yes. Q. And did you arrive before the lecture began? A. Probably a few minutes. Q. A few minutes before the lecture began? A. Yeah. Yes. Q. Did anyone accompany you to the lecture? A. Well, there were several grad students. I don't remember all of whom they might be, but I do remember two individuals that were there, one being Greg Atkisson, who was -- I don't remember if he would have been biology staff at that time or still a graduate student, but also Kevin Hopper, who -- again, they're both graduate students, were graduate students in our department, so they were there. There were others, but those are the two I remember. Q. Okay. And do you remember where it was held? A. Memorial Hall. Q. Memorial Hall. And it was held in the evening, the afternoon? Do you remember? A. Sometime in the evening. Don't remember the specific time. Q. Sure. What do you remember Dr. Gaskell saying during the course of this lecture prior to the ACTION COURT REPORTERS

14 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 question-and-answer period? A. Well, the entire talk was comparing aspects of science to Genesis. I thought it was all very interesting. The thing that caught my attention at the end of the talk, he said either there's no evidence for evolution or very little evidence for evolution. And that stuck out very sharply. Q. Okay. And other than -- I'm sorry, what was the phrase you used? It stuck out? A. Yes. Q. And why did that stick out? A. It was an inaccurate statement. Q. Okay. Do you recall any other inaccurate statements in that lecture other than that one? A. I do not recall any others. Q. Okay. So to the best of your recollection, the only statement that you can remember that you believed was inaccurate was a remark along the lines of there is little or no evidence for evolution? A. Correct. Q. Do you remember what his exact words were? A. I do not. I didn't write it down. So I don't know either or, either one of those comments is inaccurate. Q. Have you ever seen a transcript of this -- ACTION COURT REPORTERS

15 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 of the lecture? A. No. Q. Or you ever hear an audio recording of it? A. No. Q. And that stuck out in your mind. Did you -- from what we understand, you may have asked Dr. Gaskell about that at the end of the lecture? A. There was a ten-minute break until question and answer. I was going to head off right then and there. I stayed. I had the first question. I don't remember many of the specifics other than I was -- I was rather upset by that statement and questioned it. Q. Okay. And how did you question it? A. I don't remember many of the details. I do remember responding as to the inaccuracy of it, and I don't remember all of his responses. The one that sticks out most clearly was he said: You do agree with me that there are few or no transitional forms. Which is grossly inaccurate, and I did respond to that at length. There are various other comments that are classic antievolution comments. I can't remember them specifically. That one sticks out the most because we had the most lengthy exchange on that. Q. I'm sorry, the most lengthy exchange was whether or not there are transitional...? ACTION COURT REPORTERS

16 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 A. Forms. Q. Forms. Okay. What does that mean? A. That means a specimen that shows an evolutionary transition between say a fish and an amphibian, between an amphibian and a reptile, between a reptile and a mammal, something of that sort. Q. And it is your position or the position of science that there are transitional forms? A. It is the position of science and it is the evidence that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of transitional forms. Q. Did you understand Dr. Gaskell to be saying that he disagreed with the idea that there are transitional forms? A. Well, that's the assumption if when asked the question you do agree there are few transitional forms. And, you know, that's -- the question suggests that it's thought that there aren't. Q. Okay. Anything else that you can remember from the question-and-answer period? A. Not specifically. Q. Did you leave -- or did you start to leave in the middle of Dr. Gaskell responding to one of your questions? A. Oh, no. We were all done. I was late. I ACTION COURT REPORTERS

17 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 needed to get home. I needed to take care of my dogs, so when I was finished, I sat there. I think Greg Atkisson asked the second question, and at some point I just needed to get out of there. And he did ask me not to leave. And it was not -- inappropriate to explain that my dogs were in bad need of my -- and I hadn't planed to stay for question and answer. I really had no intention. Q. So Dr. Gaskell asked you not to leave? A. Correct. Q. What did you say? A. I don't recall. Q. Did you leave anyway, or did you sit back down? A. I think I sat down for a little bit longer, but I did have to go. I did definitely before questions and answers were over. Q. So from what I can -- again, just to sum up, I want to be sure I have everything. Again, this is not a test or I'm not trying to trick. I just want to be sure we can remember or get for the record everything that you can recall about that lecture. Something that Dr. Gaskell said that really stuck out in your mind was a remark along the lines of there's little or no evidence for evolution? ACTION COURT REPORTERS

18 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 And then -- for the lecture, that generally is all you can remember except for the fact that it dealt with Genesis and science and astronomy? A. Oh, I remember pictures of Galileo and various scientists. Again, it's been so long and what I heard sounded wonderful. Q. So everything else Dr. Gaskell was saying other than the remark about evolution and there being little or no evidence for it, you thought was wonderful? Is that... A. As best I can recall. Q. All right. And so it was just the one remark, little or no evolution? A. The one remark. Q. During that presentation, and actually in either the presentation or the question-and-answer period, did Dr. Gaskell bring up intelligent design? A. Oh, I can't specifically recall. His responses to me were very much classic creationist responses, the no transitional form being the main one. If that phrase surfaced, I do not recall. Q. Look at Krupa Exhibit No., if you would. When did you last read that, most recently read that? A. Probably last Tuesday. Q. Okay. And while you were reading it would ACTION COURT REPORTERS

19 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 it be fair to say that the general nature of that paper, Modern Astronomy, the Bible, and Creation, was the general outline of Dr. Gaskell's talk? A. It seemed similar. I did not read this over. I scanned it looking for some of the comments that I remember being objectionable that were outlined in these s from 0. But the title sounds quite a bit like what he was talking about in Memorial Hall. Q. And you mentioned the pictures of Galileo. A. Yes. Q. And then this document, Modern Astronomy, the Bible, and Creation mentions Galileo, right, and other famous scientists; is that correct? A. Oh, if it does, I'm not sure. Again, I was gleaning it for certain comments. But yeah, I see right here we do have them all, Kepler, Galileo, Herschel, Einstein. Q. When you were gleaning this document, did you find anything in here regarding transitional forms? A. I don't know that I did. I highlighted in green the things that jumped out at me. I don't see them in the sections that I highlighted, but again, I haven't read them over. I have not read this document over in detail. Q. Okay. Anything else that you remember ACTION COURT REPORTERS

20 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 about the lecture in by Dr. Gaskell? A. Really not much. It's been so long ago. Q. After the conclusion of that lecture was it -- did you walk away thinking Dr. Gaskell was antievolution? A. Well, to say that there is little or no evidence for evolution is inaccurate and would suggest that. But it is an inaccurate statement that needs to be addressed. Q. What about -- would you have characterized Dr. Gaskell as a creationist? A. His responses were the responses that classic creationists give, no transitional forms. Q. What is a creationist? A. It's certainly somebody who is -- does not accept evolution. There are several forms. There could be -- Louis Agassiz was a special creationist. So he felt that life forms appeared as they are now on multiple occasions. The general notion is that life forms did not evolve but exist now as they originally appeared. Q. And so would you say that is intellectually irreconcilable, to be a creationist and a person who accepts the theory or fact of evolution? A. Well, evolution is both theory and fact, ACTION COURT REPORTERS

21 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: first of all. It is -- those who have creationist's arguments certainly are not evolutionary biologists. Q. Okay. After receiving the from Dr. Cavagnero that he had originally addressed to Dr. Osborn, did you speak with Dr. Osborn regarding that from Dr. Cavagnero? A. Well, we had a couple exchanges. I think I was giving an exam that week, so I did not really look at the document terribly carefully, but then whenever -- a couple of s that followed, I did look at it and found probably most of these comments that I have highlighted now. Q. Okay. So the comments that you have -- that are highlighted in Exhibit, Krupa, are you saying those are probably the same things you highlighted back when you first looked at this document? A. Most likely because atheistic evolution jumped out, if I recall. The comment on intelligent design did jump out. The comment, wherever it is, about how that evolutionary biologists would be out of jobs, wherever that is in here. Q. Okay. Well, we can go through that in detail, and we will go in to that in detail. I don't mean to cut you off. Because we're going to do that later we'll proceed with where we are now. But those ACTION COURT REPORTERS

22 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: comments that you just now highlighted, you don't remember Dr. Gaskell saying those during the lecture. Right? A. Again, I don't recall much. It was that one statement that he made at the end of the talk. Q. Okay. And did you say there was an exchange between you and Dr. Osborn? A. Well, they're the ones that I assume you have. There are a couple where I think -- I can't recall. I think I mentioned that I'd look at the statement, and then I responded to his s saying that he made good points or something to that effect. But I have not looked at those s for a while. MR. SURTEES: Off the record for a second. (Off-the-record discussion.) MR. SURTEES: We can go back on record. Q. So Dr. Krupa, we were just -- off the record we were discussing some exchanges that you had with Dr. Osborn and with Dr. Cavagnero. Correct? And you're going to see if you can find those s and produce them to counsel for the University of Kentucky; is that correct? A. Correct. And I will have them. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

23 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: Q. Great. Thank you very much. Other than the exchanges, did you have any verbal discussions with Dr. Osborn regarding the from Dr. Cavagnero and his requests that at least Dr. Osborn assessed the scientific credibility of Dr. Gaskell and his website? A. I can't give you any specifics, but I'm sure we did. Q. Okay. But you don't remember any details at all? A. No, I don't. Q. Can't approximate? A. And I'm assuming we had conversations. Just as much as I talk, I can't imagine we didn't. Q. In the coffee room, perhaps? A. Possibly. Q. We heard about that earlier this morning. That's the only reason why I ask. A. Oh, okay. Q. What about with Dr. Steiner? Did you speak with Dr. Steiner regarding Dr. Cavagnero's requests to the biologists? A. And again, I'm certain that I did. Now, can I recall any specific time or conversation. I can't. But I'm certain that we did. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

24 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: Q. Okay. I believe you said at the time you read this, Modern Astronomy, the Bible, and Creation, you thought -- or it was your opinion that Dr. Gaskell was a creationist. Correct? A. Well, there are definite inconsistent statements with what we know in evolutionary biology. Q. So he would therefore be a creationist? A. Well, at the time I didn't connect this document with the person that spoke in. It took probably a day before I realized they're one and the same. But there are the classic problems of making evolution sound like it is atheism, so this atheistic evolution comment. The only individuals that make those kinds of comments are those who are opposed to evolution. So be they creationists or whatever, typically it's somebody who has some support for creationism. Q. And again, I believe you said that, and correct me if I'm wrong, that Dr. Gaskell was antievolution. Correct? It was your understanding that he would be antievolution? A. When somebody says there is little or no evidence of evolution, I don't know how else to take it but that. Q. So the support -- the idea that ACTION COURT REPORTERS

25 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: Dr. Gaskell is antievolution comes from that statement from the lecture. Correct? A. Correct. Q. At least according to your recollection. Is there anything in Modern Astronomy, the Bible, and Creation, which we have identified Exhibit No., Krupa, which indicates that Dr. Gaskell is antievolution? A. I think the more significant point is that there are several inaccurate statements about evolution, on whichever page, where there are significant problems on evolutionary theory. Q. I'm sorry, if you could stop for just one second and identify where you are. A. Page, second to the last paragraph, whole paragraph. So it's the part that I highlighted with the word "rubbish." Q. Oh, okay. A. "It is true that there are significant scientific problems in evolutionary theory (a good thing or else many biologists and geologists would be out of a job." That is a line that you hear repeatedly by those who are antievolution and who are in support of creationism. Q. So would you say that's sort of guilt by association? I mean, does Dr. Gaskell there say -- do ACTION COURT REPORTERS

26 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: you take that line to mean that Dr. Gaskell is antievolution, or do you take Dr. Gaskell to be antievolution because people who are antievolution say things like this? A. People who say things like this are antievolution. From my experience. Q. Okay. But -- and so you wouldn't say that this is -- this leads to the conclusion that Dr. Gaskell is antievolution? A. Well, it leads to the conclusion that I'd be very worried about somebody making these statements because of their inaccuracy. Q. Any other statements in here which would lead -- that led you to believe that Dr. Gaskell was antievolution? A. Well, everything that I have highlighted here, this inaccurate comment on the first page, this comment of atheistic evolution which -- Q. I'm sorry, before you keep going, let's just look at that. What did you highlight there? A. "Which exponents of atheist evolution claim." So that's not his statement, that's a summary. But you see that and you'd like to read on because saying "atheistic evolution" is in itself a statement that in science does not seem appropriate to me. I ACTION COURT REPORTERS

27 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: highlighted a couple of comments on -- Q. I'm sorry to interrupt. Let's dwell on this thing. A. Okay. Q. And we can get to all the other stuff. But could he not -- when he says atheistic evolution, could he be making a statement which is not necessarily scientific? Could he be making a philosophical point? A. That may be. I don't know. I don't know what's in his mind, but when you see a phrase like that that will for me prompt me to read on. Q. Okay. Now, where were you going to go next? A. Oh, whatever was highlighted. And again, the thing on theory, I always check to see if people use the word correctly or not, but it is page with these comments that there are significant problems in evolutionary theory, which there are not. Q. There are no -- I'm sorry. A. It's one of the cornerstones of science. It's hypothesis testing. To say that there are significant problems. I'm an evolutionary biologist. I have no clue what that means, what they are. Q. Do you think there's a distinction between saying problems with evolutionary theory and problems in ACTION COURT REPORTERS

28 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: evolutionary theory? A. "With" versus "in"? Hard to say. The statement itself is inaccurate. Q. Are there problems in evolutionary theory that remain to be resolved? A. All science is continuing to answer more questions. That will happen in any branch of science forever. So when one -- if one claims that all issues in nature are now answered by evolutionary theory, we're still answering. Q. So there are still problems to be solved in evolutionary theory? A. Yes. MS. KRIZ: Let me object to the -- you use the term "problems," and I guess we need to have an understanding of what we're talking about in terms of problems. So I would object to the form of your question. MR. SURTEES: Can you read the last question and answer back, please? (Last question and answer read.) A. Well, not in the theory, but in evolution, the discipline. Q. Okay. In the discipline of -- okay. But could one say and be perfectly in your ACTION COURT REPORTERS

29 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: mind scientifically respectable in saying that I have no problems with evolutionary theory, however there are problems in evolutionary theory which need to be resolved? A. And that's not the way I took this question. Q. Well, I know. I'm not -- A. This comment. But it still goes back to the Memorial Hall comment, which was very clear. Q. I understand. But again, if you could answer that question I asked. MR. SURTEES: Could you repeat it? A. Ask it again. (Question and answer read on page, line.) A. Again, problems as questions to be answered. There are questions to be answered. Q. Okay. Thank you. All right. Now, were you going to flip to another -- A. I think on page is the main section. Let's see. On page, again these aren't -- let's see. Also classic comments that we hear towards the bottom of page : Science has no satisfactory explanation for the origin of life yet. Note that the question of origin of ACTION COURT REPORTERS

30 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: 0 of - Page ID#: life is a separate problem from the question of validity of some theories of evolution. So that was -- that is correct. So I highlighted that. Mostly that was something that concerned evolution so I highlighted anything in here last week. Q. Okay. I'm sorry, so real quick there, Dr. Krupa, on page, the passage you just read you believe is correct; is that what you said? A. Well, that there is -- what's correct is that research on origins of life is a separate research area from evolution, and he says that, so that is correct. Q. And is it correct to say that the evidence is very good and gets stronger every year that all life on earth descended; i.e., evolved from a common origin? A. All evidence right now indicates common origin. Q. And anything else you highlighted? A. Well, let's see. On page I highlighted it. I haven't really looked at this again, so I'll read it and see what I thought about it. "This is probably a good place to state that I personally have no theoretical [sic] problem with the idea of God doing things in a way -- in ways described in modern theories ACTION COURT REPORTERS 0

31 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: of evolution, "theistic evolution." So I highlighted that because, well, it jumped out. Q. Okay. And it jumped out why? A. Well, he's making comments on evolution, so I tried to highlight any comments here that pertained to evolution. Q. I think you described -- you stated earlier, Dr. Krupa, that you thought Dr. Gaskell was antievolution. What do you think of this remark where he says, "This is probably a good place to state that I personally have no theological problem with the idea of God doing things in the ways described in modern theories of evolution"? A. That is the views of those that consider themselves a theistic evolution, and that's fine by me. Q. And is that different from creationism? A. It is different, yes. So all the denominations, Christian denominations in this country who accept evolution would classify themselves as theistic evolution. So they can accept the science of evolution and they can believe in God. Q. So in this remark you would have no problems with Dr. Gaskell? A. I have no problems with this comment. Q. Yeah, this comment, sure. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

32 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: Getting back to -- oh, any other materials or passages in Modern Astronomy, the Bible, and Creation which you believe indicates that Dr. Gaskell is a creationist? A. Again, I haven't read it in detail for years, so if there are I have not seen these. Q. Okay. Anything else? And again, I understand you haven't read it in a while. Well, you read it last week, but you just skimmed it. Correct? A. Correct. Q. That indicate that Dr. Gaskell is antievolution? Any other passages that would support that idea? A. Well, inaccurate statements about evolution suggests that. Q. Even though we -- okay. Anything else that you've read by Dr. Martin Gaskell other than Modern Astronomy, the Bible, and Creation? A. I have not read anything. Q. You haven't read any? A. No. Q. Did you look at any other items on his website? A. I have not. Well, I take that back. I ACTION COURT REPORTERS

33 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: noticed that he runs marathons. Q. Oh, okay. When did you see that? A. Oh, probably would have been about the same time I got this or maybe a few days before, I don't totally recall. Q. Do you run marathons? A. Yeah, he runs -- I don't, but he did. I thought that was quite excellent. (Off-the-record comments.) MR. SURTEES: Back on the record here. Q. Dr. Krupa, I am going to -- MR. SURTEES: If we could mark that. (Exhibit No. marked.) Q. The top of this page and -- Dr. Krupa is the document in front of you four pages long? A. Correct. Q. Okay. Just want to be sure. Now, at the top of page, looks like it's an from Mike Cavagnero to you, subject line reading, regarding two items. In this from Mike to you it says: Jim, I understand completely and am grateful for your comments. Mike. And below that it says Krupa, James J. wrote, and then we have the series of carets which appear to be your to Cavagnero, to which he is responding here; is that correct? ACTION COURT REPORTERS

34 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: A. Correct. Q. And can you just look through your here, your copied , and tell me whether or not to the best of your recollection that is everything you said in that to Dr. Cavagnero. A. Correct, that is what I said. Q. Now, you start off by saying: Greetings, Mark. I assume you meant Mike? A. Yeah. Scatterbrained. Q. Sure. A. I managed to misspell a number of names. Yeah. That's busy days. Q. Sure. And you also -- can we agree where you reference Gaskin in this that that means Gaskell? A. Yes, correct. Q. So you sent this to Dr. Cavagnero and you state: I do hope the committee will consider the Jeff sent seriously. Did you mean Jeff Osborn? A. Correct. Q. And the that Jeff sent, does that begin on page of Krupa Exhibit No.? A. Yes. Q. Did you agree with everything Jeff said in ACTION COURT REPORTERS

35 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: that ? A. Yes. Q. And you say: To have an antievolution scientist come to U.K. and be involved with science outreach will be a disaster despite the person's area of science. We've covered this, but just to be sure, when you wrote this to Dr. Cavagnero, was it your position that Dr. Gaskell was antievolution? A. Based on a Memorial Hall comment, yes. Q. So based solely on the Memorial Hall comment? Is that -- A. Well, it was reinforced by the statements that Jeff Osborn highlighted. Q. So based on the Memorial Hall lecture and the passages that Jeff Osborn highlighted, you came to the conclusion that Dr. Gaskell is an antievolution scientist? A. I came to the conclusion that what he would be saying would be inaccurate with what we know in evolutionary biology, and that would be a problem. Q. Okay. Well, here you say -- so when you say to have an antievolution scientist, you weren't necessarily referring to Dr. Gaskell? A. Those are my comments in general. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

36 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: Q. You then go on: I've heard Gaskin bash evolution. (Evolution is the unification theory of all biology.) I'm sure you've already answered the question, but I just have to cover all the bases. Where and when have you heard Gaskell bash evolution? A. Memorial Hall. Little or no evidence for evolution. Q. Okay. And is that the only place you heard Dr. Gaskell bash evolution? A. That I heard him, yes. Q. And where have you read Dr. Gaskell bash evolution? A. Well, again, these are the comments that Jeff highlighted, three points, that were not consistent with evolutionary biology. Intelligent design being one of those. Q. Sure. And again, going back now to Krupa Exhibit No., Modern Astronomy, the Bible, and Creation, where in this paper in your opinion does Dr. Gaskell bash evolution? A. Well, these comments, again on page, where there are problems that are not being made out in introductory biology/geology courses. That's simply biologically inaccurate. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

37 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: Q. Okay. And you think he's bashing evolution there? A. Well, to make inaccurate statements about evolution to me is bashing. Q. Okay. "We might as well have folks in the creation museum get involved with U.K. science outreach efforts," you go on to say. Correct? A. Yes. Q. And then the next paragraph: I know that -- let me just read it ahead before I read it all. Second full paragraph: I know that if Biology had the opportunity to hire the greatest geneticist that exists and one with multiple Nobel prizes who also was going around lecturing on the age of earth being,000 years, I would fight to prevent the hire. A. Correct. Q. Was it your understanding that Dr. Gaskell believed the age of the earth was,000 years? A. I was giving that as an example of how I would really speak out against anybody who is making inaccurate scientific statements. Not reference to Gaskell at all, but in general, because we do have such individuals around. Q. Okay. What do you mean by that last ACTION COURT REPORTERS

38 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: remark "we have such individuals around"? A. We have a faculty member on the U.K. campus that gives talks against evolution. He's tenured. He has made reference to the earth being young. Q. And who is this professor? A. His name is Art Nitz. Q. What department does he work for? A. Physical therapy. Q. And you go on: With all the problems we have in improving science education, Gaskin -- or Gaskell -- will only set us back. And then you continue. "And he WILL bash evolution!" Correct? A. Correct. Q. And your basis for stating that is what? A. Memorial Hall comments. Q. So is it -- so based on that lecture, which took place ten years prior to you sending this , you were of the belief that Dr. Gaskell would bash evolution? A. If he made that public comment in Memorial Hall, there's no reason to assume that that would not happen again. Q. Assuming that what your account of what ACTION COURT REPORTERS

39 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: Dr. Gaskell said is correct, what he said about evolution at Memorial Hall is correct, is it possible that he could have changed his mind between then and at the time you wrote this ? A. I have no way to know that. Anything is possible, but I have no way to know that. Q. And then you continue. "He did" -- I take it that that means bash evolution -- "when he spoke here many years ago at Memorial Hall." We've discussed that. "I really ripped in to him during question-answer period, and his responses only got more ridiculous and more creationist in nature." A. Correct. Q. And that's an accurate assessment. Right? A. Correct. Q. Which you believe to be an accurate assessment? A. Correct. Q. Who else did you -- I think we -- MS. KRIZ: Let me ask off the record. (Off-the-record discussion.) Q. Back on the record here. I just have some general questions here for you, Dr. Krupa. I'm looking for any and all conversations that you had regarding Dr. Gaskell with a number of individuals. So we're ACTION COURT REPORTERS

40 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: 0 of - Page ID#: going to go through some names here. A. Okay. Q. I believe we already spoke about Dr. Osborn. Can you remember any details of any conversations you had with Dr. Osborn regarding Dr. Gaskell? A. I can't remember any specifics at all, other than it would have been on these points that he ed. Q. Sure. Any conversations regarding Dr. Gaskell with Dr. Cavagnero? A. We've never -- I think this is the first time we've spoken in person. Q. Okay. Over the phone? A. Never over the phone. Q. Any conversations regarding Dr. Gaskell with Dean Hoch? A. I have never spoken to Dean Hoch about this. I don't think I've ever spoken to him face-to-face or on the phone either. I don't get out much. Q. Any conversations with Provost Subbaswamy regarding Dr. Gaskell? A. I have never spoken to him in life, in person, over the phone. This is shedding a bad light on ACTION COURT REPORTERS 0

41 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 me, isn't it? MR. MANION: Not really. THE WITNESS: Stay under the radar of the administrators. Q. Any conversations with Dr. Gaskell -- I'm sorry, any conversations about Dr. Gaskell with anyone in the physics and astronomy department? A. Never. Well, let me reiterate. After the Memorial Hall talk when I was leaving, in the foyer a number of people, I don't know who they are, I assume they are astronomy folks from the department, and I did speak to them that I thought it was very inappropriate for someone who is not an evolutionary biologist to publicly say there's little or no evidence for evolution. I remember distinctly making that comment -- I don't know who the individual was -- and then I left. Q. And did the individual respond to you? A. Probably. What would the response have been? I do not remember. Q. Any other conversations from that evening of the lecture at Memorial Hall that you can recall either prior to or after the lecture? A. Oh, I'm sure I probably spoke to several in the biology department, probably grad students that I was quite upset about hearing somebody publicly say ACTION COURT REPORTERS

42 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: there was little to no evidence for evolution. So that will come up. Who those individuals might have been, I can't even begin to remember. I talk a lot, so it would probably be several people. Q. Any conversations regarding Dr. Gaskell with somebody by the name of Patty Bender? A. I don't know who Patty Bender is. Q. Any conversations regarding Dr. Gaskell with anyone else in the scientific community outside the University of Kentucky? A. I do not remember any specific conversations about Gaskell in particular. Q. Do you stay in touch with anyone at the University of Nebraska? A. I stay in touch with folks at the University of Nebraska Omaha, which is the separate -- that's the Omaha campus. So I'm in fairly close touch with a couple of folks there. Q. And have you spoken with any of them about Dr. Gaskell? A. I would highly doubt it. Q. Other than the s that we have looked at this morning, have you ever written about Dr. Martin Gaskell in an or an article or in any writing at all? ACTION COURT REPORTERS

43 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: A. I don't think that I did. I can't give you an example. I doubt that I would have. Q. Dr. Krupa, who is Eugenie Scott? A. Jeanie Scott is the head of the National Center for Science Education. Q. And what is the National Center for Science Education? A. Oh, it's the organization that defends science education. It defends education of evolutionary biology. Q. Do they do good work in your opinion? A. I think so. I think so. Q. Is it Dr. Eugenie Scott; do you know? A. Yes. She was a faculty member here at the University of Kentucky. Q. And would you say that she's on top of this whole evolution issue with respect to education? A. She should be. That's the job. Q. That's her job. Do you know whether or not actually their mission statement is that they are wholly dedicated to defending the teaching of evolution in the public schools? A. That sounds correct. MR. SURTEES: Dr. Krupa, we're going to take a few minutes' break here. ACTION COURT REPORTERS

44 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: THE WITNESS: Okay. (Off the record.) MR. SURTEES: No further questions. MS. KRIZ: No further questions. You're free to go. (DEPOSITION CONCLUDED :.) ACTION COURT REPORTERS

45 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: STATE OF KENTUCKY ) COUNTY OF FAYETTE ) I, ANN HUTCHISON, Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public, State of Kentucky at Large, whose commission as such will expire May,, do hereby certify that the foregoing deposition was taken by me at the time, place, for the purpose and with the appearances set forth herein; that the same was taken down by me in stenotype in the presence of the witness and thereafter correctly transcribed by me upon computer; and that the witness was duly placed under oath by me prior to giving testimony. I further certify that I am not related to nor employed by any of the parties to this action or their respective counsel and have no interest in this litigation. Given under my hand, this nd day of April,. ANN HUTCHISON, RPR Registered Professional Reporter Notary Public, State-at-Large ACTION COURT REPORTERS

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 96 - Page ID#: 786

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 96 - Page ID#: 786 Case: 5:09-cv-00244-KSF-REW Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 96 - Page ID#: 786 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV-00244-KSF VIDEOTAPED

More information

Curtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003

Curtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION 3 JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, Plaintiff, 4 vs. CASE NO. 1:02-CV-2325-CC 5 COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 6 COBB COUNTY BOARD

More information

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 44 Filed: 10/19/10 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 2141

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 44 Filed: 10/19/10 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 2141 Case: 5:09-cv-00244-KSF-REW Doc #: 44 Filed: 10/19/10 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 2141 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION CASE NO. 5:09-cv-00244-KSF

More information

Page 280. Cleveland, Ohio. 20 Todd L. Persson, Notary Public

Page 280. Cleveland, Ohio. 20 Todd L. Persson, Notary Public Case: 1:12-cv-00797-SJD Doc #: 91-1 Filed: 06/04/14 Page: 1 of 200 PAGEID #: 1805 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 EASTERN DIVISION 4 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5 6 FAIR ELECTIONS

More information

CASE NO.: BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. /

CASE NO.: BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. / UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Page 1 CASE NO.: 07-12641-BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. / Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A. 100 Southeast 2nd Avenue

More information

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY 1 STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY 2 MILWAUKEE BRANCH OF THE NAACP 3 VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, RICKY T. LEWIS, JENNIFER T. PLATT, JOHN J. WOLFE, 4 CAROLYN ANDERSON, NDIDI BROWNLEE, ANTHONY FUMBANKS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA I N D E X T O W I T N E S S E S TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al : : CASE NO. v. : :0-CR-00 : DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, : et al : FOR

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA................ TAMMY KITZMILLER; BRYAN and. CHRISTY REHM; DEBORAH FENIMORE. and JOEL LIEB; STEVEN STOUGH;. BETH EVELAND; CYNTHIA

More information

PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0. Sanjeev Lath vs. City of Manchester, NH DEPOSITION OF PATROL OFFICER AUSTIN R. GOODMAN

PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0. Sanjeev Lath vs. City of Manchester, NH DEPOSITION OF PATROL OFFICER AUSTIN R. GOODMAN 1 PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH SS SUPERIOR NORTH DOCKET NO. 216-2016-CV-821 Sanjeev Lath vs., NH DEPOSITION OF This deposition held pursuant to the New Hampshire Rules of

More information

LIABILITY LITIGATION : NO. CV MRP (CWx) Videotaped Deposition of ROBERT TEMPLE, M.D.

LIABILITY LITIGATION : NO. CV MRP (CWx) Videotaped Deposition of ROBERT TEMPLE, M.D. Exhibit 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Page 1 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----------------------x IN RE PAXIL PRODUCTS : LIABILITY LITIGATION : NO. CV 01-07937 MRP (CWx) ----------------------x

More information

/10/2007, In the matter of Theodore Smith Associated Reporters Int'l., Inc. Page 1419

/10/2007, In the matter of Theodore Smith Associated Reporters Int'l., Inc. Page 1419 1 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 4 In the Matter of 5 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v. 6 THEODORE SMITH 7 Section 3020-a Education Law Proceeding (File

More information

Teresa Plenge Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al July 1, Page 1

Teresa Plenge Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al July 1, Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION 3 JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, Plaintiff, 4 vs. CASE NO. 1:02-CV-2325-CC 5 COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 6 COBB COUNTY BOARD

More information

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 3 J.F., et al., ) 4 Plaintiffs, ) 3:14-cv-00581-PK ) 5 vs. ) April 15, 2014 ) 6 MULTNOMAH COUNTY SCHOOL ) Portland, Oregon DISTRICT

More information

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Plaintiff, Defendant. hearing before the Honorable Daniel C. Moreno, one of

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Plaintiff, Defendant. hearing before the Honorable Daniel C. Moreno, one of STTE OF MINNESOT DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIL DISTRICT State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Chrishaun Reed McDonald, District Court File No. -CR-- TRNSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Defendant. The

More information

GAnthony-rough.txt. Rough Draft IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 2 FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

GAnthony-rough.txt. Rough Draft IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 2 FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Rough Draft - 1 GAnthony-rough.txt 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 2 FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 ZENAIDA FERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ, 4 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 5 vs. CASE NO.:

More information

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC Filing # 7828 E-Filed 09//2018 07:41 : PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CRIMINAL NO. l5-oo6cfano STATE OF FLORIDA, VS. JOHN N. JONCHUCK,

More information

Page 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

Page 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Page 1 STATE OF ALASKA, Plaintiff, vs. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 3AN-06-05630 CI VOLUME 18 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS March 26, 2008 - Pages

More information

Case 3:10-cv GPC-WVG Document Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5

Case 3:10-cv GPC-WVG Document Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5 Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 388-4 Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5 Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 388-4 Filed 03/07/15 Page 2 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) 1:09-CV-13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) 1:09-CV-13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.) RIBIK ) ) VS. HCR MANORCARE, INC., et al. ) ) ) :0-CV- ) ) ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA ) OCTOBER,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE HONORABLE NEIL V. WAKE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE HONORABLE NEIL V. WAKE, JUDGE FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Joseph Rudolph Wood III, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV --PHX-NVW Phoenix, Arizona July, 0 : p.m. 0 BEFORE: THE HONORABLE

More information

INTERVIEW OF: CHARLES LYDECKER

INTERVIEW OF: CHARLES LYDECKER INTERVIEW OF: CHARLES LYDECKER DATE TAKEN: MARCH 1, TIME: :0 P.M. - : P.M. PLACE: BROWN & BROWN 0 SOUTH RIDGEWOOD AVENUE DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA 1 1 --0 1 1 APPEARANCES: JONATHAN KANEY, ESQUIRE Kaney &

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Docket No. CR ) Plaintiff, ) Chicago, Illinois ) March, 0 v. ) : p.m. ) JOHN DENNIS

More information

Page 1. Case 1:09-cv CKK Document 48-3 Filed 04/12/11 Page 1 of 129

Page 1. Case 1:09-cv CKK Document 48-3 Filed 04/12/11 Page 1 of 129 Case 1:09-cv-02030-CKK Document 48-3 Filed 04/12/11 Page 1 of 129 Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2 - - - 3 COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC: 4 RELATIONS, : : 5 Plaintiff,

More information

STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO, NEVADA TRANSCRIPT OF ELECTRONICALLY-RECORDED INTERVIEW JOHN MAYER AUGUST 4, 2014 RENO, NEVADA

STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO, NEVADA TRANSCRIPT OF ELECTRONICALLY-RECORDED INTERVIEW JOHN MAYER AUGUST 4, 2014 RENO, NEVADA STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO, NEVADA TRANSCRIPT OF ELECTRONICALLY-RECORDED INTERVIEW JOHN MAYER AUGUST, RENO, NEVADA Transcribed and proofread by: CAPITOL REPORTERS BY: Michel Loomis

More information

The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page

The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page Page 1 Transcription Hyderabad Discussion of Motions Friday, 04 November 2016 at 13:45 IST Note: Although the transcription is largely accurate, in some cases it is incomplete or inaccurate due to inaudible

More information

CAMERON SANDERS and KEVIN S. SANDERS, Plaintiffs,

CAMERON SANDERS and KEVIN S. SANDERS, Plaintiffs, CAMERON SANDERS and KEVIN S. SANDERS, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16-2012-CA-008487-XXXX-MA DIVISION: CV-H vs. Plaintiffs, NEWPORT UNIT

More information

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 40 - Page ID#: 54

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 40 - Page ID#: 54 Case: 5:09-cv-00244-KSF-REW Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 40 - Page ID#: 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON C. MARTIN GASKELL, ) ) Plaintiff,

More information

Lindsey Tippins Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 25, 2003

Lindsey Tippins Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 25, 2003 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION 3 JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, Plaintiff, 4 vs. CASE NO. 1:02-CV-2325-CC 5 COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 6 COBB COUNTY BOARD

More information

The Argument Clinic. Monty Python. Index: Atheism and Awareness (Clues) Home to Positive Atheism. Receptionist: Yes, sir?

The Argument Clinic. Monty Python. Index: Atheism and Awareness (Clues) Home to Positive Atheism. Receptionist: Yes, sir? Page 1 of 5 Index: Atheism and Awareness (Clues) Home to Positive Atheism Receptionist: Yes, sir? Man: I'd like to have an argument please. Monty Python Receptionist: Certainly, sir, have you been here

More information

INTERVIEW OF: TIMOTHY DAVIS

INTERVIEW OF: TIMOTHY DAVIS INTERVIEW OF: TIMOTHY DAVIS DATE TAKEN: MARCH, TIME: : A.M. - : A.M. PLACE: HOMEWOOD SUITES BY HILTON BILL FRANCE BOULEVARD DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA APPEARANCES: JONATHAN KANEY, ESQUIRE Kaney & Olivari,

More information

UNOFFICIAL, UNEDITED, UNCERTIFIED DRAFT

UNOFFICIAL, UNEDITED, UNCERTIFIED DRAFT 0 THIS UNCERTIFIED DRAFT TRANSCRIPT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED OR PROOFREAD BY THE COURT REPORTER. DIFFERENCES WILL EXIST BETWEEN THE UNCERTIFIED DRAFT VERSION AND THE CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT. (CCP (R)() When prepared

More information

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION 3 TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al., : CASE NO. Plaintiffs : 4:04-CV-02688 4 vs. : DOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT, : Harrisburg,

More information

MITOCW ocw f99-lec19_300k

MITOCW ocw f99-lec19_300k MITOCW ocw-18.06-f99-lec19_300k OK, this is the second lecture on determinants. There are only three. With determinants it's a fascinating, small topic inside linear algebra. Used to be determinants were

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, California 6 vs. ) May 2, 2002 ) 7 ROGER VER,

More information

Page 1 EXCERPT FAU FACULTY SENATE MEETING APEX REPORTING GROUP

Page 1 EXCERPT FAU FACULTY SENATE MEETING APEX REPORTING GROUP Page 1 EXCERPT OF FAU FACULTY SENATE MEETING September 4th, 2015 1 APPEARANCES: 2 3 CHRIS BEETLE, Professor, Physics, Faculty Senate President 4 5 TIM LENZ, Professor, Political Science, Senator 6 MARSHALL

More information

Tuesday, February 12, Washington, D.C. Room 2247, Rayburn House Office Building, commencing at 10

Tuesday, February 12, Washington, D.C. Room 2247, Rayburn House Office Building, commencing at 10 1 RPTS DEN DCMN HERZFELD COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT ND GOVERNMENT REFORM, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTTIVES, WSHINGTON, D.C. TELEPHONE INTERVIEW OF: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 Washington, D.C. The telephone interview

More information

Armstrong & Okey, Inc., Columbus, Ohio (614)

Armstrong & Okey, Inc., Columbus, Ohio (614) Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 237-2 Filed: 09/26/14 Page: 1 of 87 PAGEID #: 5915 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION - - - 1 Libertarian Party of Ohio, :

More information

Condcnsclt! Page 1. 6 Part 9. I don't think I could have anticipated the snow. 7 and your having to be here at 1:30 any better than I did.

Condcnsclt! Page 1. 6 Part 9. I don't think I could have anticipated the snow. 7 and your having to be here at 1:30 any better than I did. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND STATE OF MARYLAND, V. ADNAN SYEO, BEFORE: Defendant. Indictment Nos. 199100-6 REPORTER'S OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS (Trial on the Merita) Baltimore.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a Federal agency,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a Federal agency, 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case No. -cv-0-wyd-kmt ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, INC., a Colorado non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2012 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 0/0/0 INDEX NO. /0 NYSCEF DOC. NO. - RECEIVED NYSCEF: 0/0/0 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY - CIVIL TERM - PART ----------------------------------------------x

More information

DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11

DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11 1 NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR 13 DHC 11 E-X-C-E-R-P-T THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ) ) PARTIAL TESTIMONY Plaintiff, ) OF )

More information

Case 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Document 79-4 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Document 79-4 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 11 Case 2:08-cv-00575-GLF-NMK Document 79-4 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 11 Case 2:08-cv-00575-GLF-NMK Document 79-4 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of Page 11 4680 IN THE MATTER OF THE TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OF JOHN

More information

DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS

DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS The purpose of this memorandum is to inform you of what a deposition is, why it is being taken, how it will be taken, and the pitfalls to be avoided during its taking. WHAT IS DEPOSTION

More information

American Legal Transcription 11 Market Street - Suite Poughkeepsie, NY Tel. (845) Fax: (845)

American Legal Transcription 11 Market Street - Suite Poughkeepsie, NY Tel. (845) Fax: (845) Exhibit A Evid. Hrg. Transcript Pg of UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------- In Re: Case No. 0-000-rdd CYNTHIA CARSSOW FRANKLIN, Chapter White Plains,

More information

Case 3:10-cv GPC-WVG Document Filed 03/03/16 Page 4 of 129 EXHIBIT 2

Case 3:10-cv GPC-WVG Document Filed 03/03/16 Page 4 of 129 EXHIBIT 2 Case 3:-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 462-2 Filed 03/03/ Page 4 of 9 EXHIBIT 2 Case 3:-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 462-2 Filed 03/03/ Page 5 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

UNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1602, MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order.

UNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1602, MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order. 0 [The R.M.C. 0 session was called to order at 0, February.] MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order. All parties present before the recess are again present. Defense Counsel, you may call

More information

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, 05 CF 381 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: September 28, 2009 9 BEFORE:

More information

Case 2:13-cv RFB-NJK Document Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 85. 2:13-cv RFB-NJK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 2:13-cv RFB-NJK Document Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 85. 2:13-cv RFB-NJK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case :-cv-00-rfb-njk Document - Filed // Page of :-cv-00-rfb-njk UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, INTELIGENTRY, LIMITED, et al., Defendants.

More information

* EXCERPT * Audio Transcription. Court Reporters Certification Advisory Board. Meeting, April 1, Judge William C.

* EXCERPT * Audio Transcription. Court Reporters Certification Advisory Board. Meeting, April 1, Judge William C. Excerpt- 0 * EXCERPT * Audio Transcription Court Reporters Certification Advisory Board Meeting, April, Advisory Board Participants: Judge William C. Sowder, Chair Deborah Hamon, CSR Janice Eidd-Meadows

More information

Case 1:16-cv S-PAS Document 53 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 167 PageID #:

Case 1:16-cv S-PAS Document 53 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 167 PageID #: Case :-cv-000-s-pas Document Filed 0/0/ Page of PageID #: 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CIVIL ACTION JOHN DOE * -00 * VS. * JULY, 0

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF BEAUFORT CALLAWASSIE ISLAND MEMBERS ) CLUB, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) -versus- JAMES E. NEWCOMBE and LOLITA ) TRIFILETTI NEWCOMBE, ) ) Defendants.

More information

5 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO Case No: SC JUDGE RICHARD H. ALBRITTON, JR / 7

5 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO Case No: SC JUDGE RICHARD H. ALBRITTON, JR / 7 1 1 2 3 BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION 4 5 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO. 04-239 Case No: SC05-851 6 JUDGE RICHARD H. ALBRITTON, JR. --------------------------------------/ 7 8 9

More information

... TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al.,... CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-CV vs... DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,. (JUDGE JONES) et al.,.. Defendants...

... TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al.,... CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-CV vs... DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,. (JUDGE JONES) et al.,.. Defendants... IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.............. TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al.,.. Plaintiffs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-CV-2688. vs... DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,. (JUDGE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MICHAEL GARBOWSKI and STEPHEN ) BUSHANSKY, On Behalf of Themselves ) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) Plaintiffs, v. ) TOKAI PHARMACEUTICALS,

More information

Plaintiff, ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS, DIOCESE OF WINONA and THOMAS ADAMSON, Defendants.

Plaintiff, ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS, DIOCESE OF WINONA and THOMAS ADAMSON, Defendants. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY IN DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DOE, vs. Plaintiff, ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS, DIOCESE OF WINONA

More information

A P P E A R A N C E S FOR THE PLAINTIFF: MR. DIRRELL S. JONES (BY TELEPHONE) ASSISTANT DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL State Bar of Texas Office of the Chief

A P P E A R A N C E S FOR THE PLAINTIFF: MR. DIRRELL S. JONES (BY TELEPHONE) ASSISTANT DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL State Bar of Texas Office of the Chief CUSE NO. 380-01407-2013 COMMISSION FOR LWYER )( IN THE DISTRICT COURT DISCIPLINE, )( )( Plaintiff, )( )( VS. )( 380th JUDICIL DISTRICT )( TY CLEVENGER, )( )( Defendant. )( COLLIN COUNTY, TEXS ---------------------------------------------------------------

More information

2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA x

2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA x 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 -----------------------------------x 5 ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, 7 -against- No. CV05-06242-SJO

More information

ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEN ANDERSON VOLUME 2

ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEN ANDERSON VOLUME 2 CAUSE NO. 86-452-K26 THE STATE OF TEXAS ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff(s) Page 311 VS. ) WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS MICHAEL MORTON Defendant(s). ) 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION

More information

Worldwide Court Reporters, Inc. (800)

Worldwide Court Reporters, Inc. (800) 1 3 1 CAUSE NO. 2008-2173-4 2 AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GROUP, LLC., ) 3 ) PLAINTIFF, ) 4 ) VS. ) 5 ) CITY OF WACO, TEXAS, ) 6 ) DEFENDANT, ) MCLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS 7 ) VS. ) 8 )

More information

A. She worked in the White House for a while, first as an intern, and then in the legislative affairs office.

A. She worked in the White House for a while, first as an intern, and then in the legislative affairs office. Excerpt from President Clinton s deposition on January 17, 1998, in the civil action brought against him by Paula Jones. James Fisher led the questioning for Jones. The President was defended by Bob Bennett.

More information

BAIL BOND BOARD MEETING. Judge Woods. Judge West. Judge Lively. Lt. Mills. Pat Knauth. Casi DeLaTorre. Theresa Goodness. Tim Funchess.

BAIL BOND BOARD MEETING. Judge Woods. Judge West. Judge Lively. Lt. Mills. Pat Knauth. Casi DeLaTorre. Theresa Goodness. Tim Funchess. BAIL BOND BOARD MEETING 0 THOSE PRESENT: Judge Branick Judge Woods Judge West Judge Lively Lt. Mills Pat Knauth Casi DeLaTorre Theresa Goodness Tim Funchess Keith Day Mary Godina Liz Parks Glenda Segura

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al : : CASE NO. v. : :0-CR-00 : DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, : et al : TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BENCH TRIAL

More information

) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETI'S. 2 SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT (Consolidated CA No ) 3

) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETI'S. 2 SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT (Consolidated CA No ) 3 )0001 1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETI'S 2 SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT (Consolidated CA No. 02-1296) 3 4 JAMES M. HOGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 5 VS. 6 THE ROMAN CATHOLIC 7 ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON, a

More information

BERT VOGELSTEIN, M.D. '74

BERT VOGELSTEIN, M.D. '74 BERT VOGELSTEIN, M.D. '74 22 December 1999 Mame Warren, interviewer Warren: This is Mame Warren. Today is December 22, 1999. I'm in Baltimore, Maryland, with Bert Vogelstein. I've got to start with a silly

More information

>> THE NEXT CASE IS STATE OF FLORIDA VERSUS FLOYD. >> TAKE YOUR TIME. TAKE YOUR TIME. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY.

>> THE NEXT CASE IS STATE OF FLORIDA VERSUS FLOYD. >> TAKE YOUR TIME. TAKE YOUR TIME. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> THE NEXT CASE IS STATE OF FLORIDA VERSUS FLOYD. >> TAKE YOUR TIME. TAKE YOUR TIME. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> GOOD MORNING. MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

More information

EXHIBIT 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. LIST INTERACTIVE LTD., d/b/a Uknight Interactive; and LEONARD S.

EXHIBIT 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. LIST INTERACTIVE LTD., d/b/a Uknight Interactive; and LEONARD S. EXHIBIT 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. -CV-000-RBJ LIST INTERACTIVE LTD., d/b/a Uknight Interactive; and LEONARD S. LABRIOLA, Plaintiffs, vs. KNIGHTS

More information

Interview being conducted by Jean VanDelinder with Judge Robert Carter in his chambers on Monday, October 5, 1992.

Interview being conducted by Jean VanDelinder with Judge Robert Carter in his chambers on Monday, October 5, 1992. Kansas Historical Society Oral History Project Brown v Board of Education Interview being conducted by Jean VanDelinder with Judge Robert Carter in his chambers on Monday, October 5, 1992. J: I want to

More information

Countrywide - Testimony Taken in Investigation MOZILO ANGELO - August 20, :00:00 a.m. 177:1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Countrywide - Testimony Taken in Investigation MOZILO ANGELO - August 20, :00:00 a.m. 177:1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 177:1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 2 3 In the Matter of: ) 4 ) File No. LA-3370 5 COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ) 6 WITNESS: Angelo Mozilo 7 PAGES: 177 through 389 8 PLACE: Securities

More information

FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :09 PM INDEX NO. 2014EF5188 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2015 OCHIBIT "0"

FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :09 PM INDEX NO. 2014EF5188 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2015 OCHIBIT 0 FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 09/30/2015 10:09 PM INDEX NO. 2014EF5188 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2015 OCHIBIT "0" TRANSCRIPT OF TAPE OF MIKE MARSTON NEW CALL @September 2007 Grady Floyd:

More information

CERTIFIED COPY SWORN STATEMENT 12 ROBERTO J. BAYARDO 13 OCTOBER 3,

CERTIFIED COPY SWORN STATEMENT 12 ROBERTO J. BAYARDO 13 OCTOBER 3, 1 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SWORN STATEMENT 12 ROBERTO J. BAYARDO 13 OCTOBER 3, 2011 14 15 16 17 CERTIFIED COPY 18 19 20 Sworn Statement OF ROBERTO J. BAYARDO, given 21 on the 3rd day of October, 2011,

More information

STIDHAM: Okay. Do you remember being dispatched to the Highland Trailer Park that evening?

STIDHAM: Okay. Do you remember being dispatched to the Highland Trailer Park that evening? Testimony of James Dollahite in Misskelley trial Feb 1994 STIDHAM: Would you please state your name for the Court? DOLLAHITE: James Dollahite. STIDHAM: And where are you employed Officer Dollahite? DOLLAHITE:

More information

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 47 Filed: 11/23/10 Page: 1 of 19 - Page ID#: 2191

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 47 Filed: 11/23/10 Page: 1 of 19 - Page ID#: 2191 Case: 5:09-cv-00244-KSF-REW Doc #: 47 Filed: 11/23/10 Page: 1 of 19 - Page ID#: 2191 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-244-KSF

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 1 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AFFINITY WEALTH MANAGEMENT, : INC., a Delaware corporation, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action : No. 5813-VCP STEVEN V. CHANTLER, MATTHEW J. : RILEY

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT NO. 2 FOR CLARK COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA. CASE NO. 10CO PL-088 Special Appointed Judge: Susan Orth

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT NO. 2 FOR CLARK COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA. CASE NO. 10CO PL-088 Special Appointed Judge: Susan Orth IN THE CIRCUIT COURT NO. 2 FOR CLARK COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA STATE OF INDIANA, vs. Plaintiff KEVIN ZIPPERLE, MARY LOU TRAUTWEIN- LAMKIN, SHARON CHANDLER, and FRANK PRELL CASE NO. 10CO2-1208-PL-088 Special

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Stephen G. Montoya (#01) MONTOYA JIMENEZ, P.A. The Great American Tower 0 North Central Avenue, Ste. 0 Phoenix, Arizona 0 (0) - (fax) - sgmlegal@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Ramsey media interview - May 1, 1997

Ramsey media interview - May 1, 1997 Ramsey media interview - May 1, 1997 JOHN RAMSEY: We are pleased to be here this morning. You've been anxious to meet us for some time, and I can tell you why it's taken us so long. We felt there was really

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. : Case No. 2:13-CV : Judge Watson

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. : Case No. 2:13-CV : Judge Watson Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 222-1 Filed: 09/24/14 Page: 1 of 82 PAGEID #: 4849 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION - - - Libertarian Party of Ohio,: Kevin

More information

Indictment THE GRAND JURY CHARGES: COUNTl [False Declarations Before Grand Jury]

Indictment THE GRAND JURY CHARGES: COUNTl [False Declarations Before Grand Jury] U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF N.Y. FILED f':~'1:',, ~ lv< ;' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YO~AWRENCE ~ L~~~~MAN, CLERK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal No. /:14-CR-f/~(,/.$

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2013 EXHIBIT F

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2013 EXHIBIT F FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/2013 INDEX NO. 651659/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2013 EXHIBIT F Transcript: Tim Finchem Like 0 0 0 April 30, 2013 JOEL SCHUCHMANN: Good afternoon,

More information

Deposition of Karl Willers taken 11/21/14 Weldon & Associates (952)

Deposition of Karl Willers taken 11/21/14 Weldon & Associates (952) 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 3 4 5 File No. 13-CV-266 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 Forest Olivier et al., 8 Plaintiffs, 9 vs. 10 11 Karl Willers et al., 12 Defendants.

More information

saw online, change what you're telling us today? MR. GUY: Thank you, ma'am. MR. GUY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLLA: Yes, Your Honor. (Witness excused.

saw online, change what you're telling us today? MR. GUY: Thank you, ma'am. MR. GUY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLLA: Yes, Your Honor. (Witness excused. saw online, change what you're telling us today? No, sir. MR. GUY: Thank you, ma'am. THE COURT: ll right. May she be excused? MR. GUY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLL: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: ll right. Thank

More information

Case 1:06-cv WYD-MJW Document 150 Filed 09/12/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 110

Case 1:06-cv WYD-MJW Document 150 Filed 09/12/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 110 Case 1:06-cv-01135-WYD-MJW Document 150 Filed 09/12/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 558 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 2 Civil Action No. 06-cv-01135-WYD-MJW 3 ALLSTATE INSURANCE

More information

Second and Third John John Karmelich

Second and Third John John Karmelich Second and Third John John Karmelich 1. Let me give my lesson title first: The word "truth". That's one of John's favorite words to describe what all Christians should believe and effect how we live as

More information

A & T TRANSCRIPTS (720)

A & T TRANSCRIPTS (720) THE COURT: ll right. Bring the jury in. nd, Mr. Cooper, I'll ask you to stand and be sworn. You can wait till the jury comes in, if you want. (Jury present at :0 a.m.) THE COURT: Okay, Mr. Cooper, if you'll

More information

DEPOSITION OF: JASON C. COWART

DEPOSITION OF: JASON C. COWART IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIL CIRCUIT, IN ND FOR DUVL COUNTY, FLORID. CSE NO.: -C- DIVISION: CV-H WLTER HMMOND, an individual, vs. Plaintiff, LBERT J. RUSSELL LODGE NO. FREE ND CCEPTED MSONS

More information

4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 8 THE COURT: All right. Feel free to. 9 adjust the chair and microphone. And if one of the

4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 8 THE COURT: All right. Feel free to. 9 adjust the chair and microphone. And if one of the 154 1 (Discussion off the record.) 2 Good afternoon, sir. 3 THE WITNESS: Afternoon, Judge. 4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 5 please. 6 (Witness sworn.) 7 THE WITNESS: Yes, sir. 8 THE COURT: All right.

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA 0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD of ETHICS, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) CASE NO: 0CV-00 ) TERENCE SWEENEY, ) Defendant. ) MOTION FOR COMPLAINT HEARD BEFORE HONORABLE

More information

Case 2:13-cr FVS Document 369 Filed 05/09/14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION

Case 2:13-cr FVS Document 369 Filed 05/09/14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. :-CR-000-FVS ) RHONDA LEE FIRESTACK-HARVEY, ) LARRY LESTER

More information

2 CASE NAME: PRECISION DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS. 3 YURI PLYAM, ET AL. 4 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011

2 CASE NAME: PRECISION DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS. 3 YURI PLYAM, ET AL. 4 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011 1 1 CASE NUMBER: BC384285 2 CASE NAME: PRECISION DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS. 3 YURI PLYAM, ET AL. 4 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011 5 DEPARTMENT 17 HON. RICHARD E. RICO, JUDGE 6 REPORTER: SYLVIA

More information

Interview with DAISY BATES. September 7, 1990

Interview with DAISY BATES. September 7, 1990 A-3+1 Interview number A-0349 in the Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) at The Southern Historical Collection, The Louis Round Wilson Special Collections Library, UNC-Chapel Hill. Interview

More information

TwiceAround Podcast Episode 7: What Are Our Biases Costing Us? Transcript

TwiceAround Podcast Episode 7: What Are Our Biases Costing Us? Transcript TwiceAround Podcast Episode 7: What Are Our Biases Costing Us? Transcript Speaker 1: Speaker 2: Speaker 3: Speaker 4: [00:00:30] Speaker 5: Speaker 6: Speaker 7: Speaker 8: When I hear the word "bias,"

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION IN RE SPRINGFIELD GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION ) ) ) ) CASE NO. -MC-00 SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 0 JULY, TRANSCRIPT

More information

MITOCW ocw f99-lec18_300k

MITOCW ocw f99-lec18_300k MITOCW ocw-18.06-f99-lec18_300k OK, this lecture is like the beginning of the second half of this is to prove. this course because up to now we paid a lot of attention to rectangular matrices. Now, concentrating

More information

FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 4 SECOND FLOOR COMMISSION CHAMBERS 5 400

FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 4 SECOND FLOOR COMMISSION CHAMBERS 5 400 0001 1 FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 4 SECOND FLOOR COMMISSION CHAMBERS 5 400 EAST LOCUST STREET 6 UNION, MISSOURI 63084 7 8 9 TRANSCRIPT

More information

The Gift of the Holy Spirit. 1 Thessalonians 5:23. Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill

The Gift of the Holy Spirit. 1 Thessalonians 5:23. Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill The Gift of the Holy Spirit 1 Thessalonians 5:23 Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill We've been discussing, loved ones, the question the past few weeks: Why are we alive? The real problem, in trying

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 0--PHX-GMS Phoenix,

More information

MORNING SESSION 17 COUNSEL PRESENT:

MORNING SESSION 17 COUNSEL PRESENT: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 TAMMY J. KITZMILLER, et al., : 3 Plaintiffs : : Case Number 4 vs. : 4:04-CV-02688 : 5 DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; : DOVER

More information

COPYING NOT PERMITTED, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (D)

COPYING NOT PERMITTED, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (D) 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 DEPARTMENT 85 HON. JAMES C. CHALFANT, JUDGE 4 5 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, ) ) 6 PETITIONER, ) ) 7 VS. ) NO. BS136663

More information

LOS ANGELES - GAC Meeting: WHOIS. Let's get started.

LOS ANGELES - GAC Meeting: WHOIS. Let's get started. LOS ANGELES GAC Meeting: WHOIS Sunday, October 12, 2014 14:00 to 15:00 PDT ICANN Los Angeles, USA CHAIR DRYD: Good afternoon, everyone. Let's get started. We have about 30 minutes to discuss some WHOIS

More information