RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN PLURALIST SOCIETY: HOW DOES ARTICLE 9 FIT IN?
|
|
- Maximilian Adams
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN PLURALIST SOCIETY: HOW DOES ARTICLE 9 FIT IN? Introduction 1. In this talk I will be considering the impact of Article 9 in the sphere of education and addressing two key questions: (i) How, and with what degree of success, has Article 9 been invoked in order to challenge decisions or policies affecting the nature or content of education? (ii) How is Article 9 jurisprudence in this area likely to develop domestically and in particular, what potential is there for future judicial reviews of the faith schools policies that are currently causing so much controversy? 2. By way of introduction, I briefly summarize certain aspects of the case law in this area that are worthy of note. 3. Firstly, the ECtHR has been manifestly reluctant to pronounce any decisions on Art 9 points in cases where the Applicant has simultaneously invoked other Convention rights - which, of course, is the usual approach taken by Applicants in Strasbourg jurisprudence in order to maximize their chances of success. Accordingly, in their judgments, the ECtHR frequently declares it unnecessary to consider the Art 9 point, in favour of other Convention Articles the relevant Article in these education cases being, more often than not, Article 2 Protocol 1 ( Art 2 P1 ). 4. Art 2 P1, as a reminder, is the right to education. Its second sentence intersects with Art 9, stating: In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to education and to teaching, the State shall respect the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching is in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.
2 5. Secondly, where the ECtHR has made decisions on Art 9 in these cases, it has tended to adopt a restrictive approach - closing down rather than opening pathways to successful claims. This is notable for its contrast to the fairly open approach the Court has taken to developments in the realm of Art Thirdly, as for domestic courts application of Art 9 in this area in the UK: as yet they have proved at least as reluctant as the ECtHR, if not more reluctanct, to allow claims against schools on points of religion in education. 7. However, at a time where the debates on faith schools admissions and curricula are reaching new levels of intensity, in particular as they intersect with related debates about immigration and multiculturalism in modern society, and as cases such as the Jewish Free Schools case are progressing through the courts in the eye of the media, it seems likely that this type of judicial review challenge is going to be increasingly probed, explored and tested over the coming years. 8. In considering this topic, I will first discuss three ECHR cases which deal with Art 9 in the education sphere. They are all concerned with parents contesting school policies relating to lessons and activities which have religious elements or implications. Efstratiou v Greece (Application no. 77/1996/696/888) 18 Dec The Applicants in this case were Jehovah s Witnesses who complained that their daughter s school had punished her with suspension for refusing to participate in the national parade. The daughter had refused because she claimed participation was incompatible with her belief in pacifist principles as a Jehovah s Witness. The school s punishment of the pupil was in accordance
3 with a Government Circular. The Applicant s case was that this infringed their rights under Art 9, and also under Art 2 P The parade at issue was one of the school and military parades organised around Greece on National Day, to commemorate the outbreak of war with Fascist Italy in The school and military parades are held simultaneously in a small number of municipalities in Greece. The Applicants argued that the parade was militaristic in character; but the Government contended that the National Day commemorated Greece's attachment to the values of democracy, liberty and human rights which had provided the foundation for the post-war legal order. 11. In making her case on Art 9, the Applicants asserted that it guaranteed the daughter s right to the negative freedom not to manifest, by gestures of support, any convictions or opinions contrary to her own. They disputed both the necessity and the proportionality of the interference, having regard to the seriousness of the penalty, which they said stigmatised and marginalised her. 12. In the Government's submission, Art 9 protected only aspects of religious practice in a generally recognised form that were strictly a matter of conscience and the State was not obliged to take positive measures to adapt its activities to the various manifestations of its citizens' beliefs as was being required here. 13. The Court found that there was no breach of Art 2 P1, or Art 9. Its reasoning in this judgment is interesting in the way it links these two rights together. On Art 2 P1, the Court said that it did not consider that it must rule of its own motion on the question of whether Sophia s right to education was respected. It justified this by reference to the established principle that Art 2 P1 must be interpreted in light of other rights - including Art 9.
4 14. On Art 9, then, the Court went on to conclude that, although it accepted that Jehovah s Witnesses pacifist beliefs fell under Art 9, it could discern nothing in the parade or in the arrangements for it which could offend the appellants pacifist convictions to an extent prohibited by the second sentence of Art 2 P1 [para. 32] continuing that such commemorations of national events serve, in their way, both pacifist objectives and the public interest. The presence of military representatives at some of the parades does not in itself alter the nature of the parades. Ultimately, the Court held that the parade was a neutral event, and it was within the school s administrative discretion as to matters of discipline to require pupils attendance. It is notable that, in considering the Art 9 claim, the Court took into account the fact that the school had already allowed the pupil exemption from religious education lessons and the Orthodox mass in the past, after receiving written requests from her parents - albeit this was arguably a distinct issue from the matter complained of. 15. The Court was far from united in their judgment in this case: there were two dissenting judges, both of whom took the view that there had been a breach of both Articles. 16. As for Art 9, the dissenting judges noted that the girl had stated that the parade had a character and symbolism that were clearly contrary to her pacifist, and thus religious, beliefs and therefore, in their view, there was no basis for seeing her participation in it as necessary in a democratic society - even if most people just saw it as a public event which expressed national values and unity. These judges gave no weight to the argument that the parade should be seen as part of her education, because in their view it was not neutral in nature, and did not form part of the usual school curriculum. 17. As for Art 2 P1: in their view this right is breached where pupils are forced as part of their school duties to take part in organised events imbued with a symbolism that is contrary to the religious and philosophical convictions of
5 their parents a principle which applied even more strongly where the events are held in a public place, outside school, on a national holiday, with the intention of delivering a message to the community. It was not unreasonable, they thought, for the Applicants to be of the opinion that the parade required the pupils to show publicly that they adhered to beliefs contrary to those of their parents. And because the Applicants held this opinion, the judges found that the episode must therefore have been capable of disturbing that family and humiliating that pupil, irrespective of the value most other people in Greek society may place on such national events. 18. It could be said that the majority judgment of the Court in this case is at least questionable in its analysis. Its method for dealing with the whole matter boils down to making its own assessment of the respective views of the government (together with the assumed majority of the Greek population) and the individual applicants about the meaning and significance of the parade, in order to arrive at its own conclusions about the parade in light of Art 9 those conclusions being that the parade was a neutral event which should not be seen to have religious significance at all, and therefore that Art 9 was not even engaged. 19. By reasoning that Art 9 was not engaged, the Court was then able to sidestep any consideration of the qualification included in the Art 9: namely that state restrictions of individuals right to freely manifest their religious beliefs is only justified where necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. Notably, this qualification was considered vital by the dissenting judges in coming to their opposite decision - following from their initial view that Art 9 was engaged. Similarly - by the reasoning of the majority of the Court that Art 2 P1 was essentially inseparable from Art 9 and stemmed from it, they were able to conclude Art 2 P1 was not engaged, and sidestep consideration of the fact that there is no
6 comparable qualifying provision included in Art 2 P1 to limit the rights of parents to ensure conformity of education with their convictions. 1 Folgero and Ors v Norway (App No /02), 29 June In this case, the applicants were non-christian parents, who were active members of the Norwegian Humanist Association. They complained about the refusal by authorities to grant their children exemption from religious education, and brought the claim under both Art 9 and Art 2 P To briefly put the case in context: Norway has a state religion and a state church, namely Lutheran Christianity, which is enshrined in its constitution, together with a guarantee of freedom of religion. 86% of the population are members. Instruction in the Christian faith had been part of the Norwegian education curriculum since The curriculum was reformed between , and a new subject called KRL was introduced, with the intention of combining education on Christianity with education on other religions and philosophies, although retaining Christianity as the focus. The subject included religious activities including prayers and learning of religious texts, as well as bible study. There was a partial right of exemption, and which could only be granted after parents had specified reasons. 22. Many secular and other religious associations complained that the subject was dominated by Lutheran Christianity and included preaching, and therefore an allowance of partial exemption from the classes was not enough. They lodged a petition to the UN Human Rights Committee, under Art. 18 of the International Covenant (the parallel right to Art 9). The Committee agreed that 1 This particular point was not expressly considered in the dissenting judgment either, notwithstanding it theoretically renders Art 2 P1 an even stronger one for Applicants in these sorts of cases than Art 9. It seems that the ECtHR has still not considered this issue.
7 the system of partial exemption was a burden on parents and not practicable, and parents should not have to give reasons in order to apply for it. In response to the Committee s opinion, the Norwegian Government took steps to modify the subject, including a clear division of the practical and theoretical elements of the lessons, and increased flexibility in relation to parents wishes. 23. However, the applicants complained to the ECtHR that the subject was still neither objective nor pluralistic in its content, and that full exemption was still not granted; they had to give brief reasons even for partial exemption. They alleged a breach of Art 2 P1, together with art 14 in conjunction with Arts 8 and 9 for discrimination on the basis of non-religion. 24. The Government argued that, when designing this subject, it had carefully considered the problem that it was likely to include elements which could run counter to philosophical or religious convictions of parents, but took the view that it was in the interests of the pupils to acquire knowledge of religions and philosophies of life, and that the Convention adequately safeguarded against indoctrination. They pointed to the traveaux preparatoires to assert that the subject reflected a well-balanced compromise between the competing interests of parents and the interests of children in acquiring knowledge of religions. 25. The Court decided that the complaint fell most suitably to be examined under Art 2 P1 than under Art 9 (although gave no specific reasons for this). The explanation for the fact that the reverse approach was taken to that in Efstratiou v Greece (above) is probably that the matter complained of here was the substance of the educational curriculum, whereas in Efstratiou the parade was outside the curriculum. In any event, the Court noted that A2P1 must be interpreted in light of Art 9, and that the two were inextricably connected.
8 26. After setting out certain governing principles, they set out the key question as being whether the State had taken care that the information or knowledge in the curriculum for the subject be conveyed in an objective, critical and pluralistic manner or whether it had pursued an aim of indoctrination not respecting the applicant parents religious and philosophical convictions and had thereby transgressed the limit implied by Art 2 P As for the facts, the Court noted that whilst stress was laid in the curriculum upon the teaching being primarily knowledge-based, teachers of the subject were also required take as a starting point the Christian object clause : a specified aim to give pupils a Christian and moral upbringing. It was also a stated aim in the curriculum to transmit thorough knowledge of the Bible and Christianity, and there was a clear preponderance of Christianity in the composition of the subject. Looked at in the round, the Court concluded that the curriculum and legislative framework suggested that not only quantitative but qualitative differences applied to the teaching of Christianity as opposed to other religions and philosophies. 28. On the issue of the exemption mechanism, the Court found that the partial exemption permitted by the State was practically difficult in that, for example, it presupposed parents to be adequately informed of the lesson plans in advance. The Court found that the requirement for parents to give reasonable grounds for requesting it was also invasive of their private life. It was also insufficient in strength, as schools were not bound to allow a pupil exemption in any event. 29. Consequently the Court held that it does not appear that the State took sufficient care that information and knowledge was conveyed in an objective, critical and pluralistic manner for the purposes of Art 2P1, and that accordingly the refusal to grant parents full exemption was a violation of that Article. Again, the Court found it unnecessary to carry out a separate
9 examination in relation to Art 14 in conjunction with the other Convention Articles, including Art A joint dissenting opinion was issued by 8 judges, stating that in their view a review of the case required consideration of modern Norwegian society with its centuries of history as an important background, in particular the long tradition of Christianity. In its view this history must be reflected in the curriculum which should be both inclusive and broad. 31. They raised the issue of whether the part of the Norwegian Constitution setting out Christianity as the state religion even raised an issue under Art 2 P1 or Art 9, and took the view that it did not. They did not accept that what they called the mentioned requirement in the curriculum to take the Christian object clause as a starting point for the lessons would actually give the subject a strong Christian leaning. Whilst they agreed that Christianity represented a greater part of the curriculum than the other world religions and philosophies, they pointed out that others represented about half, and values to be promoted in the curriculum included humanist values. Unlike the majority, then, they concluded that there were not qualitative differences as to the teaching of Christianity relative to other religions. 32. As for the partial exemption scheme: in the dissenting judges view it did take into account parents needs, and was not unreasonable in requiring them to give reasons. If a school were to refuse a request, they pointed out that there was a safeguard by way of an appeal procedure. 33. Consequently they were satisfied that the State had taken care that the curriculum was conveyed in an objective, critical and pluralistic manner, and therefore did not think it violated Art 2 P1. Hasan and Elyem Zengin v Turkey (Application no.1448/04) 9 Oct 2007
10 34. In this case decided not long after Folgero - the applicants, a religious family, complained that the manner in which lessons in religious culture and ethics were taught to their children in Turkey infringed their rights under the second sentence of A2 P1 and Art 9. These lessons were compulsory on a national level, under the Turkish curriculum. The applicants had asked for exemption from the religious culture and ethics classes under the official mechanism, by submitting a request to the Directorate of National Education, but this request had been refused. 35. The applicants were adherents of the religious movement Alevism. Alevism is considered by many to be a branch of Islam, but considers itself to be a belief or philosophy influenced by various other cultures, religions and philosophies particularly Sufism. Alevis reject Sharia law, and the rituals of Sunnism including pilgrimage to Mecca and they defend values such as freedom of religion, women s rights, humanism and tolerance. The applicants contended that the compulsory classes were based on the rules of Hanafite Islam, that no teaching at all was given about their own faith, and that ultimately the classes were not being taught in an objective, critical or pluralist manner. 36. The Turkish government pointed out that the legal basis of national education was officially secularism, and contended that this principle ultimately underpinned the classes. 37. The Court again outlined certain governing principles, in particular emphasizing that Art 2 P1 must be read in light of Arts 8, 9 and 10. They commented that it seems very difficult for many subjects taught at school not to have, to a greater or lesser extent, some philosophical complexion or implications.
11 38. However, they emphasized, as in the previous cases, that part of the aim of Art 2 P1 was to encourage pupils to develop a critical mind by conveying knowledge pluralistically, avoiding misplaced proselytism. They emphasized the importance of pluralism in this context, stating: the Court considers that, in a democratic society, only pluralism in education can enable pupils to develop a critical mind with regard to religious matters in the context of freedom of thought, conscience and religion. 39. As for the facts of the case: the Court considered a range of evidence about the classes, including the fact that pupils were required to learn parts of the Koran by heart. They noted that the Alevi faith was indeed not included in the curriculum, despite its deep historical roots in Turkish society, and noted that the Government accepted that the religious diversity in Turkish society was not really taken into account in these lessons. They acknowledged that according to the curriculum, these classes had been devised for the very purpose of promoting understanding, tolerance and respect among pupils from differing backgrounds. However, they questioned whether the priority given to the teaching of Islam in the syllabus in practice could in truth be considered as remaining within acceptable limits for the purposes of Art 2 P In relation to the second sentence of Art 2 P1, the Court noted that it was necessary for states, as far as possible, to avoid conflict between schools and parents on matters of religious education, and that, with this in mind, most contracting states included an opt-out mechanism for religious education classes - yet Turkey made these classes compulsory. The only route Turkey provided for parents to opt out was by making a prior declaration of their religion to the school, and schools still had the discretion to refuse such a request. The Court took the view that this mechanism was ultimately not appropriate for some parents, as it placed an unduly heavy burden upon them. (Notably this is similar to the exemption system in place in Folgero.)
12 41. The Court concluded that there was a breach of the second sentence of A2 P1, and it was not necessary to make a separate finding on Art 9 notwithstanding that they expressly noted earlier in the judgment that the inadequate exemption procedure may have been in conflict with Art It is interesting to consider the reasons why the Court was united in this case, with no dissenting votes, when it is clearly very factually similar to Folgero, in which there were eight dissenting judges. This may be due entirely to the fact that there was a precedent on a similar case, although it could be argued that a factor in Hasan was that the religion in question happened to be Islam, whereas in Folgero it was Christianity. And politics aside, it is interesting to consider whether the increasing emphasis on cultural and religious pluralism within modern society as a whole is behind this shift in Court s jurisprudence in the direction of applicants in these cases. Domestic law: JR 43. How, then, is this ECHR jurisprudence relevant to domestic education law, and in particular to the hot topic of faith schools and their admissions policies? 44. Clearly the above cases are precedents for potential challenges to the content of religious education lessons in schools, on the basis of Art 9 or Art 2 P1. But as for the issue of faith school admissions: could there be Art 9 issues here? Could Art 9, for instance, be invoked in an argument that no statefunded school should be able to refuse a pupil admission on the basis that she manifests a religion contrary to the religion of the school? 45. To give a bit of background to this issue: as you will doubtless be aware, the Government s School Admissions Code came into force in February last year, and the new School Admission Appeals Code came into force in January this year. These Codes have force, and can be the subject of legal challenge.
13 Admissions authorities (usually local authorities) are responsible for devising admissions policies for their area and for operating them. They and all the other authorities involved in the discharging of admissions policies must comply with the Codes, or will be in breach of their statutory duty. Legal challenges can be mounted in respect of compliance with the Codes - there are procedures both allowing parents to appeal specific admissions decisions, and allowing both parents and other groups and authorities to challenge the admissions policies themselves Both the Admissions Code and the Admission Appeals Code have been controversial, and have been made open to public consultation, with amendments being discussed. Unsurprisingly, faith schools admissions have proved to be particularly controversial within the public consultations, as these schools of course have much more freedom over their own admissions arrangements and requirements. This freedom has been modified somewhat - for example, under the Admissions Code the governing body of a new faith school must consult with their religious authority when considering admission arrangements, and they are subject to the same Admission Appeals Code as state and other maintained schools. However, there is still much discussion over the degree of flexibility that should be left open to faith schools regarding admissions. There has been discussion in the consultations as to whether they should be able to expressly exclude applicants from a particular social or religious group, or state that only applicants of a particular social or religious group will be considered - and whether they should be able to take account of factors associated with some religious beliefs such as the marital status of parents. The interpretation of the Codes is open to question in various respects. 2 Where parents wish to appeal specific decisions on admissions, they can lodge an appeal from 14 days after notification of the decision, and their case will be heard by an independent Admissions Appeal Panel. Legal challenges to the admissions policies themselves can be mounted by parents, local authorities, admission authorities, school governing bodies, Admissions Forums and some religious bodies - by objecting to the Schools Adjudicator under the 2007 Admission Appeals Regulations.
14 For example, there is a requirement that oversubscription criteria be fair, but in the context of faith schools, what some members of the school s principal faith group might consider fair might seem highly unfair to others outside that group. Jews Free School Case 47. Indeed, the Jews Free School case - which has been in the eye of the media over the last few weeks - centres on the criteria the school applies when assessing applicant parents' religious credentials. (The trial has just finished, although the Court s decision has not yet been published.) 48. The parents challenged the school over its decision to reject their daughter. She was rejected on the basis that her mother was not born Jewish, but converted to the faith in the 1980s. Such conversions are not recognised by some British Jews, and indeed the school's interpretation of Jewish law on this point has been backed by the Chief Rabbi. 49. The Chief Schools Adjudicator refused to overturn the decision against the parents, accepting that the school is acting in accordance with Jewish law. He did order the school to alter some parts of its admissions policy, removing rules that could give priority to children with a Jewish father or grandparent under some circumstances. However, this did not affect the applicants. 50. The principal ground for the judicial review of the adjudicator s decision was that the school had racially discriminated against them and their daughter. The applicants have been backed by the local authority, which has also called for the JFS to change its admissions policy, and by secular groups including the British Humanist Association. The school insists that its admissions policy is based on religion, not race, and therefore it did not breach race discrimination laws. 51. However, school leaders, religious groups and secular groups will be watching the case keenly, as some believe a victory for the applicants could set a precedent with implications for religious schools across the country. Indeed, the British Humanist Association, which wants faith and education to be kept separate, believes the case could call into question the policies of many of the
15 thousands of state schools that base their admissions wholly or in part on the religious background of an applicant family. Art 2 P1 and Art 9: Grounds for a challenge to state funding of faith schools? 52. The Equality Act 2006 explicitly allows faith schools to be exempt from the UK s law against discrimination on grounds of religious belief, and is clearly designed to allow them freedom to determine admission criteria on the basis of religion. s.59 of the Act states: (1) Nothing in this Part shall make it unlawful for an educational institution established or conducted for the purpose of providing education relating to, or within the framework of, a specified religion or belief (a) (b) to restrict the provision of goods, facilities or services, or to restrict the use or disposal of premises. (2) But subsection (1) permits a restriction only if imposed (a) (b) by reason of or on the grounds of the purpose of the institution, or in order to avoid causing offence, on grounds of the religion or belief to which the institution relates, to persons connected with the institution. (3) In this Part a reference to the provision of facilities or services shall not, in so far as it applies to an educational institution, include a reference to educational facilities or educational services provided to students of the institution.
16 53. Although this provision clearly creates a domestic law exception for faith schools in respect of their education provision, there is no specification in s.59 as to the type of school concerned, i.e. the way in the schools are funded. Arguably the provision leaves room for an argument that the current system of state funding of such faith schools is in breach of Art 9, and that s.59 should be correctly interpreted as being limited to privately funded schools, in order to ensure that all parents free, non-discriminatory access to education under Art 2 P These admission questions are linked to, and fuel for, the wider argument made by secular organizations, such as the National Secular Society, that publicly funding such a large number of faith schools as there is in Britain is itself a form of discrimination against pupils from non-religious families, and may even amount to indirect discrimination on the basis of wealth within state education. They point to statistics (which have made headline news in recent weeks) which show that religious schools admit a materially smaller proportion of pupils from less well-off families. They are cynical about the fact that, as they see it, it is becoming accepted as a chore of middle class life for aspirant parents to feign belief and attend church regularly simply to help gain access for their child to the local church school, when they wouldn t otherwise - in light of the fact that church attendance has been in decline for the last six decades. This in itself, they say, indicates that the system is going wrong, and is discriminatory. 55. Such an argument about the legitimacy of including faith schools within the state education system may seem radical in legal terms, but is not in fact beyond the realms of legal possibility as is illustrated in the recent landmark case of DH and ors. v The Czech Republic, in which the ECtHR held that the State had breached Article 14 of the Convention, in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol 1, by way of indirect discrimination against Roma children in the system of state education provision in Romania, primarily on the basis of statistical evidence that a very high number of them, relative to the rest of the
17 population, were placed in special schools which restricted their ability to develop intellectually and integrate into mainstream society. However, whether this route of challenge will be explored in the courts remains to be seen. Conclusion 56. What is clear from all this is that the turbulent topic of faith in education is showing no signs of abating in the eye of the public, and that it looks likely to lead to a Pandora s Box of future developments in the realm of human rights and administrative law. 57. The extent to which the balance of decisions will shift in favour of individual applicants over the interests of the majority, in the context of the increasingly multicultural society in which we live, and the impact (if any) this may have on education systems and curricula, is yet to be determined. JEREMY HYAM* * I am deeply indebted to Ellen Wiles for her research for this paper.
3. Opting out of Religious Instruction/Education and Formation. 4. The Teaching about Religions and Beliefs / Toledo Guiding Principles
1. Introduction. 2. The Patronage System 3. Opting out of Religious Instruction/Education and Formation 4. The Teaching about Religions and Beliefs / Toledo Guiding Principles 5. New VEC Community Primary
More informationRELIGION OR BELIEF. Submission by the British Humanist Association to the Discrimination Law Review Team
RELIGION OR BELIEF Submission by the British Humanist Association to the Discrimination Law Review Team January 2006 The British Humanist Association (BHA) 1. The BHA is the principal organisation representing
More informationGAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. Policy on Religion at Parkview Junior School
GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Policy on Religion at Parkview Junior School 30 August 2013 1 Table of Contents 1. Title of the policy... 3 2. Effective Date... 3 3. Revision History... 3 4. Preamble...
More informationThe protection of the rights of parents and children belonging to religious minorities
7 December 2016 The protection of the rights of parents and children belonging to religious minorities Revised report 1 Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination Rapporteur: Mr Valeriu Ghiletchi, Republic
More informationSubmission from Atheist Ireland On the proposed amendment to Section 37 of the Employment Equality Act
Submission from Atheist Ireland On the proposed amendment to Section 37 of the Employment Equality Act 1998-2011 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Selective Nature of the Exemptions 3. Limited Opportunities
More informationRELIGIOUS FREEDOMS IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
ALBANA METAJ-STOJANOVA RELIGIOUS FREEDOMS IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA DOI: 10.1515/seeur-2015-0019 ABSTRACT With the independence of Republic of Macedonia and the adoption of the Constitution of Macedonia,
More informationRencontre des juges européens, Bristol 24 November 2017
Supreme Court Justice, dr. juris Arnfinn Bårdsen * Religion in the public sphere Norway Rencontre des juges européens, Bristol 24 November 2017 1. One s conception of life and the transcendental is considered
More informationRELIGION AND BELIEF EQUALITY POLICY
Document No: PP120 Issue No. 02 Issue Date: 2017-02-01 Renewal Date: 2020-02--1 Originator: Head of Learner Engagement, Equalities, Diversity and Inclusion Responsibility: Deputy Principal, Finance and
More informationAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING THE CRIMINAL TRIAL OF ABDUL RAHMAN FOR CONVERTING FROM ISLAM TO CHRISTIANITY
Jay Alan Sekulow, J.D., Ph.D. Chief Counsel AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING THE CRIMINAL TRIAL OF ABDUL RAHMAN FOR CONVERTING FROM ISLAM TO CHRISTIANITY March 24, 2006
More informationArticle 31 under Part 3 on Fundamental Rights and Duties of current draft Constitution provides for Right to Religious freedom:
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND www.ohchr.org TEL: +41 22 917 9359 / +41 22 917 9407 FAX: +41 22
More informationBowring, B. Review: Malcolm D. Evans Manual on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Public Areas."
Birkbeck eprints: an open access repository of the research output of Birkbeck College http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk Review: Malcolm D. Evans Manual on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Public Areas." Security
More informationEquality Policy: Equality and Diversity for Pupils
Equality Policy: Equality and Diversity for Pupils This Policy was adopted by the Governing Body in May 2015 This policy will be reviewed in 2018 or as legislation changes 1 Our Mission Statement At Grays
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN
Strasbourg, 16 October 2012 Opinion 681/2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN ON THE DRAFT JOINT OPINION
More informationSANDEL ON RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE
SANDEL ON RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE Hugh Baxter For Boston University School of Law s Conference on Michael Sandel s Justice October 14, 2010 In the final chapter of Justice, Sandel calls for a new
More informationThe Freedom of Religion - Religious Harmony Premise in Society
The Freedom of Religion - Religious Harmony Premise in Society PhD Candidate Oljana Hoxhaj University of "Isamil Qemali" Vlora, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Law oljana.hoxhaj@gmail.com Doi:10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n6p193
More informationReligion at the Workplace
Applying EU Anti-Discrimination Law Trier, 18-19 September 2017 Religion at the Workplace Professor Gwyneth Pitt Freedom of religion Freedom of thought, conscience and belief a recognised human right UDHR
More informationRELIGION IN SCHOOLS. A guide for non-religious parents and young people in England and Wales
RELIGION IN SCHOOLS A guide for non-religious parents and young people in England and Wales ABOUT HUMANISTS UK At Humanists UK, we advance free thinking and promote humanism to create a tolerant society
More informationItaly. Italy. Transmitted by electronic mail to the address:
Vienna, 8 November 2013 National Anti-Discrimination Office Largo Chigi, 19 00187 Rome Italy Transmitted by electronic mail to the address: unar@unar.it and, a copy to: Liceo Classico A. Mariotti Piazza
More informationThe British Humanist Association's Submission to the Joint Committee of both Houses on the reform of the House of Lords
The British Humanist Association's Submission to the Joint Committee of both Houses on the reform of the House of Lords The case against ex-officio representation of the Church of England and representation
More informationFIRST SECTION. CASE OF KOPPI v. AUSTRIA. (Application no /03)
FIRST SECTION CASE OF KOPPI v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 33001/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 10 December 2009 FINAL 10/03/2010 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the
More informationFREEDOMS AND PROHIBITIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF LAÏCITÉ (CONSTITUTIONAL SECULARISM)
FREEDOMS AND PROHIBITIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF LAÏCITÉ (CONSTITUTIONAL SECULARISM) The last decades have seen the emergence, in a fragile social context, of new phenomena, such as the rise in communitarian
More informationReview of the Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT)
Review of the Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT) June 2014 Introduction Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission into the ACT Law Reform Advisory Council ( LRAC ) review of the Discrimination Act
More informationBefore : MR JUSTICE WARBY Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Case No: CO/2167/2015 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 25/11/2015 Before : MR
More informationNSS Briefing Collective Worship
Last updated: 01 October 2011 Collective Worship in Schools What s the issue? The law in England and Wales provides that children at all maintained schools shall on each school day take part in an act
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION. CASE OF KOSTESKI v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF KOSTESKI v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA (Application no. 55170/00)
More informationSubmission to the Religious Freedom Review February Independent Schools and Religious Freedom
Submission to the Religious Freedom Review February 2018 Independent Schools and Religious Freedom The Independent Schools Victoria Vision: A strong Independent education sector demonstrating best practice,
More informationCompendium of key international human rights agreements concerning Freedom of Religion or Belief
Compendium of key international human rights agreements concerning Freedom of Religion or Belief Contents Introduction... 2 United Nations agreements/documents... 2 The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
More informationUK Law Student Review April 2012 Volume 1, Issue 1
UK Law Student Review April 2012 Volume 1, Issue 1 LIMITATIONS ON THE WEARING OF RELIGIOUS DRESS: AN EXAMINATION OF THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS Keith Golder, University of Birmingham
More informationAlleged victims: The author and other members of the Union of Free Thinkers. Views under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Hartikainen v. Finland Communication No. 40/1978 9 April 1981 VIEWS Submitted by: Erkki Hartikainen on 30 September 1978 Alleged victims: The author and other members of the Union
More informationGUIDANCE TO EDUCATION AUTHORITIES AND SCHOOLS ON THE EQUALITY ACT 2006
abcdefghijklm = påüççäë=aáêéåíçê~íé = pìééçêí=ñçê=ié~êåáåö=aáîáëáçå= Directors of Education, Managers of grant aided schools and Proprietors of independent schools sáåíçêá~=nì~ó= bçáåäìêöü=bes=snn= = qéäééüçåéw=mnpnjoqq=mvmv=
More informationNorway: Religious education a question of legality or pedagogy?
Geir Skeie Norway: Religious education a question of legality or pedagogy? A very short history of religious education in Norway When general schooling was introduced in Norway in 1739 by the ruling Danish
More informationIn defence of the four freedoms : freedom of religion, conscience, association and speech
In defence of the four freedoms : freedom of religion, conscience, association and speech Understanding religious freedom Religious freedom is a fundamental human right the expression of which is bound
More informationRe: The Education Bill 2011 and schools/academies with a religious character ADVICE TO THE EHRC
Re: The Education Bill 2011 and schools/academies with a religious character Introduction ADVICE TO THE EHRC 1. You want my opinion on the issues raised in correspondence from the National Secular Society
More informationPolicy on Religious Education
Atheism Challenging religious faith Policy on Religious Education The sole object of Atheism is the advancement of atheism. In a world in which such object has been fully achieved, there would be no religion
More informationThey said WHAT!? A brief analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada s decision in S.L. v. Commission Scolaire des Chênes (2012 SCC 7)
They said WHAT!? A brief analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada s decision in S.L. v. Commission Scolaire des Chênes (2012 SCC 7) By Don Hutchinson February 27, 2012 The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada
More informationReligious Freedom Policy
Religious Freedom Policy 1. PURPOSE AND PHILOSOPHY 2 POLICY 1.1 Gateway Preparatory Academy promotes mutual understanding and respect for the interests and rights of all individuals regarding their beliefs,
More informationGood morning, and welcome to America s Fabric, a radio program to. encourage love of America. I m your host for America s Fabric, John McElroy.
1 [America s Fabric #11 Bill of Rights/Religious Freedom March 23, 2008] Good morning, and welcome to America s Fabric, a radio program to encourage love of America. I m your host for America s Fabric,
More informationFOURTH SECTION. CASE OF GRZELAK v. POLAND. (Application no. 7710/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 June 2010 FINAL 22/11/2010
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF GRZELAK v. POLAND (Application no. 7710/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 June 2010 FINAL 22/11/2010 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may be subject
More informationL A W ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND LEGAL POSITION OF CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Article 1
Pursuant to Article IV, Item 4a) and in conjuncture with Article II, Items 3g) and 5a) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina, at the 28 th
More information90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado Telephone: Fax:
90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903-1639 Telephone: 719.475.2440 Fax: 719.635.4576 www.shermanhoward.com MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Ministry and Church Organization Clients
More informationCase Notes. Religious Schools and Equal Opportunity: Lessons from Goldberg v Korsunski Carmel School
Case Notes Religious Schools and Equal Opportunity: Lessons from Goldberg v Korsunski Carmel School Kate Offer, Law School, University of Western Australia The decision of the Equal Opportunity Tribunal
More informationLaw of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic on Freedom of Worship (25/10/1990)
Law of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic on Freedom of Worship (25/10/1990) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. The Purpose of This Law The purpose of the Law of the RSFSR on Freedom of Worship
More informationShirley Chaplin. Gary McFarlane. -v- United Kingdom
Shirley Chaplin Gary McFarlane -v- United Kingdom --------------------------------------------- Oral Submission -------------------------------------------- The cases of Shirley Chaplin and Gary McFarlane
More informationComment on Martha Nussbaum s Purified Patriotism
Comment on Martha Nussbaum s Purified Patriotism Patriotism is generally thought to require a special attachment to the particular: to one s own country and to one s fellow citizens. It is therefore thought
More informationWEST SUSSEX AGREED SYLLABUS. For RELIGIOUS EDUCATION
WEST SUSSEX AGREED SYLLABUS For RELIGIOUS EDUCATION Agreed on March 10 th 2008 INDEX FOREWORD 3 Page PART 1 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN THE CURRICULUM Background 5 The importance of religious education 5 About
More informationUNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW JOINT SUBMISSION 2018
NGOS IN PARTNERSHIP: ETHICS & RELIGIOUS LIBERTY COMMISSION (ERLC) & THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM INSTITUTE (RFI) UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW JOINT SUBMISSION 2018 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN MALAYSIA The Ethics & Religious
More informationThe Churches and the Public Schools at the Close of the Twentieth Century
The Churches and the Public Schools at the Close of the Twentieth Century A Policy Statement of the National Council of the Churches of Christ Adopted November 11, 1999 Table of Contents Historic Support
More informationGrievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations
Grievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations 1.0 Introduction The Congregation is committed to providing a safe environment where the dignity of every individual is respected and therefore
More informationCollective Worship and Assemblies Policy
Sir James Smith s Community School Aspiration Ambion Achievement Collective Worship and Assemblies Policy March 2016 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Context placing the school into its socio-religious setting 3.0
More informationFreedom of Religion and Law Schools: Trinity Western University
University of Newcastle - Australia From the SelectedWorks of Neil J Foster January 23, 2013 Freedom of Religion and Law Schools: Trinity Western University Neil J Foster Available at: https://works.bepress.com/neil_foster/66/
More informationCOMITÉ SUR LES AFFAIRES RELIGIEUSES A NEW APPROACH TO RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN SCHOOL: A CHOICE REGARDING TODAY S CHALLENGES
COMITÉ SUR LES AFFAIRES RELIGIEUSES A NEW APPROACH TO RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN SCHOOL: A CHOICE REGARDING TODAY S CHALLENGES BRIEF TO THE MINISTER OF EDUCATION, SALIENT AND COMPLEMENTARY POINTS JANUARY 2005
More informationConstitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application A
Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application A The Applied Writing Assignment aims to achieve several of the substantive and generic learning outcomes posited for Constitutional
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND CULTURE INTERNAL REGULATIONS FOR STUDENTS
CONFIRMED bythe EKA Senate, 1 st November, 2005 Protocol No. 41 New edition confirmed bythe EKA Senate, 20 th December, 2007 Protocol No. 54 Amendments approved By the EKA Senate,3 rd December, 2008 Protocol
More informationJUSTICE Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion
JUSTICE Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion Jodie Blackstock Senior Legal Officer, JUSTICE Article 9 ECHR 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes
More informationEntry Level Certificate
Entry Level Certificate in Religious Studies Specification Edexcel Entry 1, Entry 2 and Entry 3 Certificate in Religious Studies (8933) For first delivery from September 2012 Pearson Education Ltd is one
More informationDISSENT AND COMPLAINT AGAINST A DECISION OF THE PRESBYTERY OF ABERDEEN
ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS 37 DISSENT AND COMPLAINT AGAINST A DECISION OF THE PRESBYTERY OF ABERDEEN We, Ian Aitken, Peter Dickson, Scott Guy, Louis Kinsey, Hugh Wallace, Nigel Parker, Dominic Smart, Thomas
More informationECHR - LAUTSI v. ITALY APRIL European Centre for Law and Justice 4 Quai Koch Strasbourg
LEGAL MEMORANDUM ECHR - LAUTSI v. ITALY APRIL 2010 Grégor Puppinck, PhD Director Kris J. Wenberg, Esq. Associate Counsel European Centre for Law and Justice 4 Quai Koch - 67000 Strasbourg http://www.eclj.org
More informationTHE POSITION OF CHILDREN S FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND RELIGION IN THE RULINGS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE CASE LAUTSI v.
THE POSITION OF CHILDREN S FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND RELIGION IN THE RULINGS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE CASE LAUTSI v. ITALY DANIEL CAPODIFERRO CUBERO 1 Abstract: In the case Lautsi v. Italy,
More informationProgram of the Orthodox Religion in Secondary School
Ecoles européennes Bureau du Secrétaire général Unité de Développement Pédagogique Réf. : Orig. : FR Program of the Orthodox Religion in Secondary School APPROVED BY THE JOINT TEACHING COMMITTEE on 9,
More informationTolerance in French Political Life
Tolerance in French Political Life Angéline Escafré-Dublet & Riva Kastoryano In France, it is difficult for groups to articulate ethnic and religious demands. This is usually regarded as opposing the civic
More informationGeneral Pharmaceutical Council Consultation on religion, personal values and beliefs in pharmacy practice
General Pharmaceutical Council Consultation on religion, personal values and beliefs in pharmacy practice What is the problem? Religious opinion is becoming more marginalised in the public sphere and there
More informationTHE GERMAN CONFERENCE ON ISLAM
THE GERMAN CONFERENCE ON ISLAM Islam is part of Germany and part of Europe, part of our present and part of our future. We wish to encourage the Muslims in Germany to develop their talents and to help
More informationJohn Locke. compelling governmental interest approach to regulate. religious conduct, and I will discuss the law further below.
compelling governmental interest approach to regulate religious conduct, and I will discuss the law further below. One should note, though, that although many criticized the Court s opinion in the Smith
More informationRELIGION IN THE SCHOOLS
INDC Page 1 RELIGION IN THE SCHOOLS In accordance with the mandate of the Constitution of the United States prohibiting the establishment of religion and protecting the free exercise thereof and freedom
More informationLIBERTY OF CONSCIENCE, NATURAL RIGHT AND ESSENCE OF LIBERTY OF THINKING Lucian Ioan TARNU
International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXI No 2 2015 LIBERTY OF CONSCIENCE, NATURAL RIGHT AND ESSENCE OF LIBERTY OF THINKING Lucian Ioan TARNU The Police Inspectorate of Sibiu County,
More informationA NATIONAL AGENDA FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
A NATIONAL AGENDA FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY People of faith have numerous concerns about threats to religious freedom in Australia, both at state and federal levels, deriving from an attitude
More informationCare home suffers under equality laws. How traditional Christian beliefs cost an elderly care home a 13,000 grant
Care home suffers under equality laws How traditional Christian beliefs cost an elderly care home a 13,000 grant Care home suffers under equality laws How traditional Christian beliefs cost an elderly
More informationPromoting British Values in the Church of England school. Guidance from the Diocesan Board of Education
Promoting British Values in the Church of England school Guidance from the Diocesan Board of Education August 2017 Introduction The Diocesan Board of Education in its vision statement, which sets out
More informationRULING OF LAW NORTHEASTERN JURISDICTIONAL CONFERENCE
RULING OF LAW NORTHEASTERN JURISDICTIONAL CONFERENCE Mark J. Webb, Bishop August 4, 2016 STATEMENT OF FACTS On Thursday, July 14, 2016, in regular session of the 2016 Northeastern Jurisdictional Conference,
More informationThis document consists of 10 printed pages.
Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Level THINKING SKILLS 9694/43 Paper 4 Applied Reasoning MARK SCHEME imum Mark: 50 Published This mark scheme is published as an aid
More informationVIEWS. Communication No. 1155/ March, 7 and 10 September 2002 (initial submission)
UNITED NATIONS International covenant on civil and political rights HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Eighty-second session 18 October - 5 November 2004 Distr. RESTRICTED * CCPR CCPR/C/82/D/1155/2003 23 November
More informationDRAFT PAPER DO NOT QUOTE
DRAFT PAPER DO NOT QUOTE Religious Norms in Public Sphere UC, Berkeley, May 2011 Catholic Rituals and Symbols in Government Institutions: Juridical Arrangements, Political Debates and Secular Issues in
More informationCalvary Chapel York Lettings Policy
Calvary Chapel York Lettings Policy Introduction Calvary Chapel York is an independent evangelical church that was founded in 1997 and is affiliated to the world- wide Calvary Chapel movement of churches.
More informationNational Policy on RELIGION AND EDUCATION MINISTER S FOREWORD... 2
National Policy on RELIGION AND EDUCATION CONTENTS MINISTER S FOREWORD... 2 INTRODUCTION TO THE POLICY ON RELIGION AND EDUCATION..3 Background to the Policy on Religion and Education... 5 The Context...
More information2017 Constitutional Updates. Based upon ELCA Model Constitution adopted 2016 at 14th Church Wide Assembly
2017 Constitutional Updates Based upon ELCA Model Constitution adopted 2016 at 14th Church Wide Assembly The Model Constitution for Congregations was adopted by the Constituting Convention of the Evangelical
More informationPOLICY FOR RELIGIOUS EDUCATION (known as Beliefs and Values)
POLICY FOR RELIGIOUS EDUCATION (known as Beliefs and Values) Date: Spring 2015 Date approved by Governing Body: 16 th March 2015 Review Schedule: 2 years Next review Date: Spring 2017 Responsibility: Curriculum
More informationAsian, British and Muslim in 1990
Asian, British and Muslim in 1990 The text of a speech which Quilliam s now chair of advisors Iqbal Wahhab delivered to Oxford University s Asian society in 1990 in the wake of the Rushdie Affair FOREWORD
More informationSejong Academy Religion Policy Page 1 of 9 RELIGION POLICY I. GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY
Sejong Academy Religion Policy Page 1 of 9 RELIGION POLICY I. GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY Sejong Academy shall neither promote nor disparage any religious belief or non-belief. Instead, Sejong Academy
More informationRELIGIOUS AND CULTURAL DAYS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN SCHOOLS
Administrative RELIGIOUS AND CULTURAL DAYS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN SCHOOLS Responsibility: Legal References: Superintendent, Student Achievement & Well-Being Education Act, Reg. 298 (S.28,29); Ontario Human
More informationFREEDOM OF EXPRESSION VERSUS FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION. IS THE CASE PUSSY RIOT POSSIBLE IN BULGARIA?
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION VERSUS FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION. IS THE CASE PUSSY RIOT POSSIBLE IN BULGARIA? ASSOC. PROF. IRENA ILIEVA PhD INSTITUTE FOR THE STATE AND THE LAW BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
More informationNotes for Oral Comments by The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada re: Bill C-51
Notes for Oral Comments by The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada re: Bill C-51 Good afternoon. The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada welcomes the opportunity to address the Committee on Bill C-51. Established
More informationInstitute on Religion and Public Policy Report: Religious Freedom in Kuwait
Executive Summary Institute on Religion and Public Policy Report: Religious Freedom in Kuwait (1) The official religion of Kuwait and the inspiration for its Constitution and legal code is Islam. With
More informationConsultation Response Form Consultation closing date: 3 June 2014 Your comments must reach us by that date
Consultation Response Form Consultation closing date: 3 June 2014 Your comments must reach us by that date New home to school travel and transport guidance If you would prefer to respond online to this
More informationProgram of the Orthodox Religion in Primary School
Ecoles européennes Bureau du Secrétaire général Unité de Développement Pédagogique Réf. : Orig. : FR Program of the Orthodox Religion in Primary School APPROVED BY THE JOINT TEACHING COMMITTEE on 9, 10
More informationRELIGIOUS EDUCATION POLICY
DARTINGTON C of E PRIMARY AND NURSERY SCHOOL RELIGIOUS EDUCATION POLICY Rationale At Dartington, as a Church of England Voluntary Controlled School, we aim to enable children to develop a personal spiritual
More informationA guide to responding to the DfE consultation on the reform of GCSE in Religious Studies
A guide to responding to the DfE consultation on the reform of GCSE in Religious Studies Contents Introduction... 3 DfE consultation documents... 3 Ofqual consultation document... 3 Purpose of this document...
More informationThe Contribution of Religion and Religious Schools to Cultural Diversity and Social Cohesion in Contemporary Australia
NATIONAL CATHOLIC EDUCATION COMMISSION The Contribution of Religion and Religious Schools to Cultural Diversity and Social Cohesion in Contemporary Australia Submission to the Australian Multicultural
More informationCollective Worship Policy
Collective Worship Policy January 2018 Article 6 - I should be supported to live and grow Article 14 - I have the right to have my own thoughts and beliefs and to choose my religion, with my parents guidance
More informationThe advancement of religion. Supporting document for charity trustees
The advancement of religion Supporting document for charity trustees The Charity Commission for Northern Ireland The Charity Commission for Northern Ireland is the regulator of charities in Northern Ireland,
More informationLaw of the Republic of Azerbaijan On freedom of religious beliefs
Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan On freedom of religious beliefs This law provides guarantees for religious freedom in the Republic of Azerbaijan in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of
More informationACCREDITATION POLICY
1. CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS Baptist Churches of South Australia Inc ACCREDITATION POLICY This Accreditation Policy has been prepared by the Accreditation and Ordination Committee in accordance with Clause
More informationRe: Criminal Trial of Abdul Rahman for Converting to Christianity
Jay Alan Sekulow, J.D., Ph.D. Chief Counsel March 22, 2006 His Excellency Said Tayeb Jawad Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Afghanistan Embassy of Afghanistan 2341 Wyoming Avenue, NW Washington,
More informationWHAT FREEDOM OF RELIGION INVOLVES AND WHEN IT CAN BE LIMITED
WHAT FREEDOM OF RELIGION INVOLVES AND WHEN IT CAN BE LIMITED A QUICK GUIDE TO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Further information Further information about the state of religious freedom internationally together with
More informationParadoxes of religious freedom in Egypt
Paradoxes of religious freedom in Egypt Tamir Moustafa and Asifa Quraishi-Landes The place of religion in the political order is arguably the most contentious issue in post-mubarak Egypt. With Islamist-oriented
More informationAlgeria Bahrain Egypt Iran
Algeria The constitution provides for freedom of conscience and worship. The constitution declares Islam to be the state religion and prohibits state institutions from behaving in a manner incompatible
More informationUnited Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review. Ireland. Submission of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.
United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review Ireland Submission of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty 21 March 2011 3000 K St. NW Suite 220 Washington, D.C. 20007 T: +1 (202) 955 0095
More informationARAB BAROMETER SURVEY PROJECT ALGERIA REPORT
ARAB BAROMETER SURVEY PROJECT ALGERIA REPORT (1) Views Toward Democracy Algerians differed greatly in their views of the most basic characteristic of democracy. Approximately half of the respondents stated
More informationThe Wearing of Christian Baptismal Crosses
The Wearing of Christian Baptismal Crosses Hegumen Philip Ryabykh is the representative of Russian Orthodox Church in Strasbourg, Igor Ponkin is director of the Institute for State-Confessional Relations
More informationReligious Diversity in Bulgarian Schools: Between Intolerance and Acceptance
Religious Diversity in Bulgarian Schools: Between Intolerance and Acceptance Marko Hajdinjak and Maya Kosseva IMIR Education is among the most democratic and all-embracing processes occurring in a society,
More informationFreedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion
Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion In Article 18 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights of 1948 provides that Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this
More information