The Trolley Problem. 11 Judith Jarvith Thomson Killing, Letting Die and the Trolley Problem (1976) 59 Oxford University Press 204-
|
|
- Erick Stanley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 This essay is going to address the trolley problem. I will use positivist theories to support arguments, particularly H.L.A Hart. Natural law theories, specifically those of John Finnis will be referred to. The last part will then conclude by providing an answer to the trolley problem. What is law and when does it become functional in society? This question will not be central to this essay, but it serves to contextualise the trolley problem that I will discuss shortly. Finnis, who is a substantive legal theorist, would explain that law is human law i.e. the translated natural law or moral truths into legislative promulgations and backed up by sanctions 1. Hart would say that law is any legislative promulgation that is in line with the rule of recognition, and backed up by sanctions 2. Hart would further stress that the existence of law, is not necessarily dependent on morality, though it may, but not necessarily 3. The rule of recognition may be based on moral criteria, thus giving rise to laws that must satisfy such criteria, which, Hart classifies under inclusive positivism 4. The trolley problem was proposed by Philippa Foot and it has been exemplified in many ways by others such as Thomson 5. The problem is like this, suppose that a driver of a trolley suddenly loses control over it as the trolley s brakes become non-functional 6. Directly ahead, are five male prisoners, working on the track 7. The track, just before the part being worked on, loops a bit to the right, and at the end of the loop or curve is a little girl, completely oblivious, as the five men are, on what is about to unfold. The driver of the trolley is faced with two choices, either he steers the trolley and he kills the little girl, or he takes no action and the five men die 8. Neither the men or the girl can escape in time and it is inevitable that either the girl or the five men die 9. Most people would feel that to let the five men die is better than killing the girl 10. But why is this the case? This is a hard case as there is no hard and fast answer to the problem. Mrs Foot s answer to the problem is that there is a strict negative duty not to kill the girl and there is a positive duty to save lives and the negative duty outweighs the number of people on 1 Denise Meyerson Jurisprudence (2014) Ibid at Ibid at Ibid. 5 Judith Jarvith Thomson The Trolley Problem (1985) 94 The Yale Law Journal Ibid at Ibid. 8 Ibid. 9 John M. Taurek Should Numbers Count? (1977) 6 Wiley Op cit note 5 at
2 the track, whether they are ten and there be one girl 11. Taurek also considers the number of people as a factor giving rise to a moral duty to save the five 12. He concludes that the choice would rest on a consideration of special factors or the value of the individuals concerned 13. In this case, the special factors are that the men are prisoners while the girl is innocent. The trolley problem, according to Thomson represents what is bad distribution in the Trolley Problem and he states that to further clarify the matter, examples about the good distribution must be taken into account. He makes an example of a health-pebble that is drifting on the shore 14. On one side of the bank are five men and on the other, is one man 15. Five of the men need the health-pebble to cure some disease, on whom it will be divided among (the pebble) 16. The one man also suffers from a disease and is in need of it to be cured 17. The question is who has a claim on the pebble, all other things being equal 18. Taurek makes an almost similar illustration using an example of a drug. He states that the drug is to be divided into five portions among the five men, but if it were to be administered to the one, he would use it wholly for his health to return 19. Thomson states that if all other things were equal, that is, no one having a claim on it, then the pebble should be distributed according to the most beneficial way 20. Thus it should be given to the five. Taurek on the other hand states that the drug, other things being equal, should be given to the five because that would save more people than the one 21. This touches on Finnis s idea of the common good. Simmonds states that the idea of law is based on it functioning as a device that can be used for diverse purposes 22. Here, he means that law becomes the practical point i.e. the purpose of law being to serve moral ideals 23. But could we say that this is the law in this situation? I should think so. Thomson states that the pebble 11 Judith Jarvith Thomson Killing, Letting Die and the Trolley Problem (1976) 59 Oxford University Press Op cit note 9 at Ibid at Op cit note 11 at Ibid. 16 Ibid. 17 Ibid. 18 Op cit note 11 at Op cit note Op cit note 11 at Op cit note N.E. Simmonds Law as a Moral Idea (2005) 55 University of Toronto Press Op cit note 1 at
3 may be given to the five men and not that it must 24. However, I am of the view that not only a moral duty, but a legal one could arise in this situation. Hart would say that it would be unobjectionable for an individual in the position of the trolley driver to ignore the trolley, and let it take its own course, provided that the law did not sanction this (legal duty to act- to steer the trolley that it end up killing the one girl). Thus Hart would point to the rule of recognition 25. It would have to be used in order to identify the primary rules of the society that the driver is a part of. This would then inform the driver of the course of action that he must take as he himself would have internalized the law. This then shows that there is no clear distinction between law and morality for I think Hart would say that our choice in the problem is to be informed by the rule of recognition. Taking into account that Hart accepts inclusive positivism, the rule of recognition could base more importance in the saving of lives. This then would become a norm in such a society, morality being the principle of legality. Thus Hart could say that there is a duty, perhaps a legal one to give the pebble to the five since this is the morality of the rule of recognition. Thus this would be the relationship between morality and law of this situation. Now going back to the trolley problem, the trolley is the bad distribution of the situation 26. Now how do we achieve the common good by distributing the trolley? Bearing in mind that the trolley represents what is bad, it should not be distributed in fact. As I said in the third paragraph, it is inevitable that the girl or the five men on the track die. Thus it would seem fitting that the trolley be distributed to one individual, that being the girl, all other things being equal of course. But all things are not equal here, for the girl is innocent and the five men are prisoners. Thus the girl has a claim not to have the trolley distributed to her. The driver will still kill the five men, even if he chooses to do nothing, because he is the driver of the trolley, regardless of the fact that the brakes have failed 27. Finnis would say the driver should not do anything and ought to allow the trolley to kill the five men because they do not uphold the central case of law, which is to obey the law, which in turn advances the common good of all as its moral content is realised 28. Hart on the other hand would say that if the society that the five fat men lived in had the rule of recognition that is based on morality, then those who have internalized the law would criticize the prisoners deviation from obeying the 24 Op cit note 11 at Op cit note 1 at Op cit note Op cit note Op cit note 1 at 42. 3
4 law 29. Despite the fact that there are two stringent negative duties not to kill the five prisoners or the girl, this negative duty not to kill the five men is terminated and it would seem justifiable that they should be killed since they do not contribute to the common good, nor do they obey the law (according to Hart). Therefore, I am of the opinion that the driver should not do anything, but ought to allow the tram to kill the five fat male prisoners. Therefore to conclude, according to Mrs Foot, the driver is burdened with two negative duties. He should refrain from killing the five than the one, but the one has a claim since this will advance the common good 30 and I should think that this is a more stringent negative duty being compared to killing one. 29 Op cit note Op cit note 11 at
5 Bibliography Journal Articles John M. Taurek Should Numbers Count? (1977) 6 Wiley Judith Jarvith Thomson Killing, Letting Die and the Trolley Problem (1976) 59 Oxford University Press Judith Jarvith Thomson The Trolley Problem (1985) 94 The Yale Law Journal N.E. Simmonds Law as a Moral Idea (2005) 55 University of Toronto Press Books Denise Meyerson Jurisprudence (2014). 5
Philosophy 1100: Ethics
Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 8: Double Effect, Doing-Allowing, and the Trolley Problem: 1. Two Distinctions Common in Deontology 2. The Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) 3. Why believe DDE? 4. The Doctrine
More informationDoes law have to be effective in order for it to be valid?
University of Birmingham Birmingham Law School Jurisprudence 2007-08 Assessed Essay (Second Round) Does law have to be effective in order for it to be valid? It is important to consider the terms valid
More informationLaw and Authority. An unjust law is not a law
Law and Authority An unjust law is not a law The statement an unjust law is not a law is often treated as a summary of how natural law theorists approach the question of whether a law is valid or not.
More informationJudge s Two Options: he can (i) let the rioters kill the five hostages, or (ii) frame an innocent person for the crime, and have him executed.
JUDITH JARVIS THOMSON Turning the Trolley i The trolley problem is by now thoroughly familiar, but it pays to begin with a description of its origins. In The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the
More informationDworkin on the Rufie of Recognition
Dworkin on the Rufie of Recognition NANCY SNOW University of Notre Dame In the "Model of Rules I," Ronald Dworkin criticizes legal positivism, especially as articulated in the work of H. L. A. Hart, and
More informationLegal positivism represents a view about the nature of law. It states that
Legal Positivism A N I NTRODUCTION Polycarp Ikuenobe Legal positivism represents a view about the nature of law. It states that there is no necessary or conceptual connection between law and morality and
More informationThe Trolley Problem. 1. The Trolley Problem: Consider the following pair of cases:
The Trolley Problem 1. The Trolley Problem: Consider the following pair of cases: Trolley: There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway tracks. Ahead, on the tracks, there are five people. The
More information* Dalhousie Law School, LL.B. anticipated Interpretation and Legal Theory. Andrei Marmor Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, 193 pp.
330 Interpretation and Legal Theory Andrei Marmor Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, 193 pp. Reviewed by Lawrence E. Thacker* Interpretation may be defined roughly as the process of determining the meaning
More information-- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use:
!#$%"%&$%# Citation: 94 Yale L. J. 1984-1985 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Tue Jan 20 10:35:59 2009 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of
More informationLEGAL THEORY / JURISPRUDENCE MODEL EXAM
LEGAL THEORY / JURISPRUDENCE MODEL EXAM LAWSKOOL UK IRAC method of completing exams Issues Rules Application Conclusion - Outline the issues that you are going to discuss. - Define the legal rules that
More informationPositivism, Natural Law, and Disestablishment: Some Questions Raised by MacCormick's Moralistic Amoralism
Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 20 Number 1 pp.55-60 Fall 1985 Positivism, Natural Law, and Disestablishment: Some Questions Raised by MacCormick's Moralistic Amoralism Joseph M. Boyle Jr. Recommended
More informationIntending Versus Foreseeing Harm
Intending Versus Foreseeing Harm The Trolley Problem: Consider the following pair of cases: Trolley: There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway tracks. Ahead, on the tracks, there are five people.
More informationComparative Legal History & 4-5 June The pros and cons of legal positivism (H L A Hart s version)
UPPSALA UNIVERSITY EXAM Department of Law Contemporary Jurisprudence Comparative Legal History & 4-5 June 2013 Contemporary Jurisprudence Write an essay about: The pros and cons of legal positivism (H
More informationETHICS. H istory, Theory, and Contemporary Issues. Steven M. Cahn. Peter Markie FOURTH EDITION. Edited by
ETHICS H istory, Theory, and Contemporary Issues FOURTH EDITION Edited by Steven M. Cahn The City University of New York Graduate Center Peter Markie University of Missouri-Columbia New York Oxford OXFORD
More informationScanlon on Double Effect
Scanlon on Double Effect RALPH WEDGWOOD Merton College, University of Oxford In this new book Moral Dimensions, T. M. Scanlon (2008) explores the ethical significance of the intentions and motives with
More informationDuring the Second World War as V1 rockets rained down on London, Churchill made a fateful decision. He would protect the city center and its vital
The Trolley Problem During the Second World War as V1 rockets rained down on London, Churchill made a fateful decision. He would protect the city center and its vital government and historical buildings
More informationCENTRAL CASE METHODOLOGY. Literature: A. Langlinais, B. Leiter, The Methodology of Legal Philosophy
CENTRAL CASE METHODOLOGY Literature: A. Langlinais, B. Leiter, The Methodology of Legal Philosophy METHODOLOGICAL ANTI- POSITIVISM normative jurisprudence (Finnis, Perry) every theory first has to select
More informationBook Review: Jurisprudence: Readings and Cases, by Mark M. MacGuigan
Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 5, Number 2 (October 1967) Article 18 Book Review: Jurisprudence: Readings and Cases, by Mark M. MacGuigan John Swan Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj
More information2015 FASCICOLO 2 (ESTRATTO) BRIAN H. BIX. The Nature of Legal Obligation (8 April 2015)
2015 FASCICOLO 2 (ESTRATTO) BRIAN H. BIX The Nature of Legal Obligation (8 April 2015) 23 dicembre 2015 BRIAN H. BIX The Nature of Legal Obligation (8 April 2015) SUMMARY: 1. Introduction 2. The Nature
More informationCHAPTER 2. The Classical School
CHAPTER 2 The Classical School Chapter 2 Multiple Choice 1. Which was not an idea which descended from the Classical School. a. The implementation of situational crime prevention b. The development of
More informationThomson s turnabout on the trolley
636 william j. fitzpatrick Thomson s turnabout on the trolley WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK The (in)famous trolley problem began as a simple variation on an example given in passing by Philippa Foot (1967), involving
More informationFACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA LAW 300 JURISPRUDENCE AND CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES. Fall 2015
FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA LAW 300 JURISPRUDENCE AND CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES Fall 2015 Professor Benjamin J Goold Office: Allard Hall, Room 455 Phone: (604) 822-9255 E-mail: goold@allard.ubc.ca
More informationLegal Positivism: the Separation and Identification theses are true.
PHL271 Handout 3: Hart on Legal Positivism 1 Legal Positivism Revisited HLA Hart was a highly sophisticated philosopher. His defence of legal positivism marked a watershed in 20 th Century philosophy of
More informationQuinn s Doctrine of Doing and Allowing (DDA)
Quinn s Doctrine of Doing and Allowing (DDA) 1. Against Foot & Bennett: Recall Philippa Foot s proposal: Doing harm is initiating or sustaining a harmful sequence. (And allowing harm is failing to prevent
More informationSame-Sex Marriage, Just War, and the Social Principles
Same-Sex Marriage, Just War, and the Social Principles Grappling with the Incompatible 1 L. Edward Phillips Item one: The United Methodist Church does not condone the practice of homosexuality and considers
More informationPHIL425: Philosophy of Law MW 9:30-10:45; WAL392
PHIL425: Philosophy of Law MW 9:30-10:45; WAL392 Professor: Mark Murphy Office: 202-687-4521 Office: 235 New North Home: 703-437-4561 Office Hours: M 11-12, W 12:30-1:30, and by appointment Course description
More informationConstitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application A
Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application A The Applied Writing Assignment aims to achieve several of the substantive and generic learning outcomes posited for Constitutional
More informationPsychological Aspects of Social Issues
Psychological Aspects of Social Issues Chapter 6 Nonconsequentialist Theories Do Your Duty 1 Outline/Overview The Ethics of Immanuel Kant Imperatives, hypothetical and categorical Means-end principle Evaluating
More information(d) Exam Writing Options Candidates can satisfy the MPL Comp requirement in one of two ways.
UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY MORAL, POLITICAL, AND LEGAL PHILOSOPHY COMPREHENSIVE EXAM INSTRUCTIONS AND READING LIST I. GENERAL OVERVIEW AND INSTRUCTIONS (a) Content The Moral,
More informationOxford Scholarship Online
University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online Moral Dilemmas: and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy Philippa Foot Print publication date: 2002 Print ISBN-13: 9780199252848 Published to Oxford
More informationPhil 108, July 15, 2010
Phil 108, July 15, 2010 Foot on intending vs. foreseeing and doing vs. allowing: Two kinds of effects an action can have: What the agent merely foresees will happen because of his action. What the agent
More informationKelsen's Pure Theory of Law
The Catholic Lawyer Volume 26 Number 2 Volume 26, Spring 1981, Number 2 Article 4 September 2017 Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law Henry Cohen Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl
More information1. The basic idea is to look at "what the courts do in fact" (Holmes, 1897). What does this mean?
Contemporary Anglo-American Jurisprudence - Important to remember that these are not just movements, they are ideas, ideas or perspectives on the law which are simultaneously alive in the law today. I.
More informationNatural Law Stoicism
Natural Law Stoicism Cleanthes: the good lies in living in agreement with nature Stoics believed that the whole of the world was identical with the fully rational creature which is God, so human law must
More informationBriefing Paper. Modern Jurisprudence Dworkin s Deadly Attack on Legal Positivism. November 2012
Briefing Paper Modern Jurisprudence Dworkin s Deadly Attack on Legal Positivism November 2012 Introduction This paper will explore whether Dworkin (Professor of Jurisprudence at University of Oxford) has
More informationWarrant, Proper Function, and the Great Pumpkin Objection
Warrant, Proper Function, and the Great Pumpkin Objection A lvin Plantinga claims that belief in God can be taken as properly basic, without appealing to arguments or relying on faith. Traditionally, any
More informationLEGAL STUDIES RESEARCH PAPER SERIES
Legal Positivism: Still Descriptive and Morally Neutral (forthcoming in the OXFORD JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES) Andrei Marmor USC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-16 LEGAL STUDIES RESEARCH PAPER SERIES
More informationPositivism A Model Of For System Of Rules
Positivism A Model Of For System Of Rules Positivism is a model of and for a system of rules, and its central notion of a single fundamental test for law forces us to miss the important standards that
More informationABOUT MORALITY AND THE NATURE OF LAW
ABOUT MORALITY AND THE NATURE OF LAW JOSEPH RAZ I. ON THE NECESSARY CONNECTION TEST Two innocent truisms about the law lie behind much of the difficulty we have in understanding the relations between law
More informationSelf-Evidence in Finnis Natural Law Theory: A Reply to Sayers
Self-Evidence in Finnis Natural Law Theory: A Reply to Sayers IRENE O CONNELL* Introduction In Volume 23 (1998) of the Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy Mark Sayers1 sets out some objections to aspects
More informationObligation and Mutual Respect
Yale Law Journal Volume 95 Issue 2 Yale Law Journal Article 10 1985 Obligation and Mutual Respect John Martin Fischer Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj Recommended
More informationThe Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy from Robert Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism (1970)
The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy from Robert Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism (1970) 1. The Concept of Authority Politics is the exercise of the power of the state, or the attempt to influence
More informationUNDERSTANDING FUNDAMENTAL SECONDARY RULES
UNDERSTANDING FUNDAMENTAL SECONDARY RULES UNDERSTANDING FUNDAMENTAL SECONDARY RULES AND THE INCLUSIVE/EXCLUSIVE LEGAL POSITIVISM DEBATE By HEATHER KUIPER, B.A., M.A. A Dissertation Submitted to the School
More informationRethinking Legal Positivism. Jules L. Coleman Yale University. Introduction
Dear Participants in the USC Workshop The following is a 'drafty' paper -- a term I use intentionally to convey a double meaning: it outlines a large research project and provides the outlines of a full
More informationPrediction Theories of Law and the Internal Point of View
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2014 Prediction Theories of Law and the Internal Point of View Michael Steven
More informationThe Need for Metanormativity: A Response to Christmas
The Need for Metanormativity: A Response to Christmas Douglas J. Den Uyl Liberty Fund, Inc. Douglas B. Rasmussen St. John s University We would like to begin by thanking Billy Christmas for his excellent
More informationPHL271 Handout 2: Hobbes on Law and Political Authority. Many philosophers of law treat Hobbes as the grandfather of legal positivism.
PHL271 Handout 2: Hobbes on Law and Political Authority 1 Background: Legal Positivism Many philosophers of law treat Hobbes as the grandfather of legal positivism. Legal Positivism (Rough Version): whether
More informationCitation for published version (APA): Petersen, T. S. (2011). What Is Legal Moralism? Sats, 12(1), DOI: /sats.
What Is Legal Moralism? Petersen, Thomas Søbirk Published in: Sats DOI: 10.1515/sats.2011006 Publication date: 2011 Document Version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version
More informationWHEN is a moral theory self-defeating? I suggest the following.
COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY 533 Marxist "instrumentalism": that is, the dominant economic class creates and imposes the non-economic conditions for and instruments of its continued economic dominance. The
More informationImpartialist Liberalism and Inclusive Legal Positivism. by: BRADY, B. ~ University of York. Introduction
Impartialist Liberalism and Inclusive Legal Positivism by: BRADY, B. ~ University of York Introduction This paper is part of a larger work whose concern is to analyze the relationship between a liberal
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons
University of San Diego Digital USD Law Faculty Works Law Faculty Scholarship 1-13-2014 The Means Principle Larry Alexander University of San Diego School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://digital.sandiego.edu/law_fac_works
More informationLegal Positivism: Still Descriptive and Morally Neutral
Cornell University Law School Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship Winter 2006 Legal Positivism: Still Descriptive and Morally Neutral Andrei
More informationTHE ROAD TO HELL by Alastair Norcross 1. Introduction: The Doctrine of the Double Effect.
THE ROAD TO HELL by Alastair Norcross 1. Introduction: The Doctrine of the Double Effect. My concern in this paper is a distinction most commonly associated with the Doctrine of the Double Effect (DDE).
More informationPreparing Now for the Hour of Our Death
Preparing Now for the Hour of Our Death Introduction While we rejoice in the resurrection of the Lord and the new life afforded to us by His Passion, our fear of death, the powerful emotions of grief,
More informationEthics is subjective.
Introduction Scientific Method and Research Ethics Ethical Theory Greg Bognar Stockholm University September 22, 2017 Ethics is subjective. If ethics is subjective, then moral claims are subjective in
More informationFeedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application B
Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application B The Applied Writing Assignment aims to achieve several of the substantive and generic learning outcomes posited for Constitutional
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL ASSUMPTIONS IN LEGAL PHILOSOPHY
PHILOSOPHICAL ASSUMPTIONS IN LEGAL PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHICAL ASSUMPI'IONS IN LEGAL PHILOSOPHY: A CRITIQUE OF CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHY OF IAW BY MARl CARMEN MARSHALL JENKINS, M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the
More information(Review) Critical legal positivism by Kaarlo Tuori
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts 2003 (Review) Critical legal positivism by Kaarlo Tuori Richard Mohr University of Wollongong,
More information[Forthcoming in The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, ed. Hugh LaFollette. (Oxford: Blackwell), 2012] Imperatives, Categorical and Hypothetical
[Forthcoming in The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, ed. Hugh LaFollette. (Oxford: Blackwell), 2012] Imperatives, Categorical and Hypothetical Samuel J. Kerstein Ethicists distinguish between categorical
More informationPROFESSOR ROBERT ALEXY wrote a book whose avowed
1 The Argument from Justice, or How Not to Reply to Legal Positivism JOSEPH RAZ PROFESSOR ROBERT ALEXY wrote a book whose avowed purpose is to refute the basic tenets of a type of legal theory which has
More informationthat the only way a belief can be justified is if it is based on sufficient evidence. However,
1 Should there exist a criteria for formulating and justifying a belief? W.K. Clifford believes that the only way a belief can be justified is if it is based on sufficient evidence. However, William James
More informationThe Dworkinian Critique of Positivism:A Critical Outline
The Dworkinian Critique of Positivism:A Critical Outline The Dworkinian Critique of Positivism:A Critical Outline By Ashish Pathak* Cite as : (2002) 8 SCC (Jour) 22 Introduction In this paper, the author
More information18 Die Philippa Foot 1
think, that we simply do not have a satisfactory theory of morality, and need to look for it. Scanlon was indeed right in saying that the real answer to utilitarianism depends on progress in the development
More informationThe Kant vs. Hume debate in Contemporary Ethics : A Different Perspective. Amy Wang Junior Paper Advisor : Hans Lottenbach due Wednesday,1/5/00
The Kant vs. Hume debate in Contemporary Ethics : A Different Perspective Amy Wang Junior Paper Advisor : Hans Lottenbach due Wednesday,1/5/00 0 The Kant vs. Hume debate in Contemporary Ethics : A Different
More informationSANDEL ON RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE
SANDEL ON RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE Hugh Baxter For Boston University School of Law s Conference on Michael Sandel s Justice October 14, 2010 In the final chapter of Justice, Sandel calls for a new
More informationBernard Hoose - Proportionalism
Bernard Hoose - Proportionalism Section 1 Proportionalism: Background Proportionalism originated among Catholic scholars in Europe and America in the 1960 s. One influential commentator of Proportionalism
More informationLaw, Shared Activities, and Obligation. Stefano Bertea
Law, Shared Activities, and Obligation Stefano Bertea 1. Introduction The contemporary debate in analytical legal philosophy is shaped by two truisms about law which jurisprudents have not yet managed
More informationRawls s veil of ignorance excludes all knowledge of likelihoods regarding the social
Rawls s veil of ignorance excludes all knowledge of likelihoods regarding the social position one ends up occupying, while John Harsanyi s version of the veil tells contractors that they are equally likely
More informationPROFESSOR HARTS CONCEPT OF LAW SUBAS H. MAHTO LEGAL THEORY F.Y.LLM
PROFESSOR HARTS CONCEPT OF LAW SUBAS H. MAHTO LEGAL THEORY F.Y.LLM 1 INDEX Page Nos. 1) Chapter 1 Introduction 3 2) Chapter 2 Harts Concept 5 3) Chapter 3 Rule of Recognition 6 4) Chapter 4 Harts View
More informationA Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism
A Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism Abstract Saul Smilansky s theory of free will and moral responsibility consists of two parts; dualism and illusionism. Dualism is
More informationVol. II, No. 5, Reason, Truth and History, 127. LARS BERGSTRÖM
Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol. II, No. 5, 2002 L. Bergström, Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy 1 Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy LARS BERGSTRÖM Stockholm University In Reason, Truth and History
More informationLegal Positivism and the Moral Aim Thesis
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3 (2013), pp. 563 605 doi:10.1093/ojls/gqt009 Published Advance Access April 5, 2013 Legal Positivism and the Moral Aim Thesis David Plunkett* Abstract According
More informationBook Review: Justice in Robes by Ronald Dworkin (2006)
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons All Papers Research Papers, Working Papers, Conference Papers 2-11-2008 Book Review: Justice in Robes by Ronald Dworkin (2006) Dan Priel
More informationThe Elusive Morality of Law
Yale Law School Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship Series Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1965 The Elusive Morality of Law Ronald M. Dworkin Yale Law School Follow
More informationSocial Rules and Legal Theory
Yale Law Journal Volume 81 Issue 5 Yale Law Journal Article 3 1972 Social Rules and Legal Theory Ronald M. Dworkin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj Recommended
More informationConstructivism, Normativity, and the Rule of Law
Constructivism, Normativity, and the Rule of Law Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Simpson, Andrew Joseph Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright is held by the author. Digital access
More informationCHARTING THE WAY FOR MODERN LEGAL POSITIVISM
CHARTING THE WAY FOR MODERN LEGAL POSITIVISM CHARTING THE WAY FOR MODERN LEGAL POSITIVISM THROUGH THE CHARTER By MICHAEL GIUDICE, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment
More informationLAW04. Law and Morals. The Concepts of Law
LAW04 Law and Morals The Concepts of Law What is a rule? 'Rules' exist in many contexts. Not just legal rules or moral rules but many different forms of rules in many different situations. The academic
More informationConsequentialism, Incoherence and Choice. Rejoinder to a Rejoinder.
1 Consequentialism, Incoherence and Choice. Rejoinder to a Rejoinder. by Peter Simpson and Robert McKim In a number of books and essays Joseph Boyle, John Finnis, and Germain Grisez (hereafter BFG) have
More informationDiscourse about bioethics is plagued by the appearance of simplicity. The
Adam J MacLeod* AT AND ALONG: A REVIEW OF THE LAW AND ETHICS OF MEDICINE: ESSAYS ON THE INVIOLABILITY OF HUMAN LIFE by John Keown Oxford University Press, 2012 xxii + 392 pp ISBN 978 0 199589 55 5 Discourse
More informationHART ON SOCIAL RULES AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF LAW: LIBERATING THE INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW
HART ON SOCIAL RULES AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF LAW: LIBERATING THE INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW Stephen Perry* INTRODUCTION The internal point of view is a crucial element in H.L.A. Hart s theory of law. Hart first
More informationThe Additive Fallacy
The Additive Fallacy by Shelly Kagan (1988) Much moral philosophy is concerned with defending or attacking the moral relevance of various distinctions. Thus consequentialists disagree with deontologists,
More informationOn legal things to do: external and internal legal reasons Comments on Brian Bix s Hart, Kelsen and legal normativity
Revus Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law / Revija za ustavno teorijo in filozofijo prava in print 2018 (- Already online -) On legal things to do: external and internal legal reasons
More informationThe Rule of Law Means Literally What it Says: The Rule of the Law : Fuller and Raz on Formal Legality and the Concept of Law+
The Rule of Law Means Literally What it Says: The Rule of the Law : Fuller and Raz on Formal Legality and the Concept of Law+ MARK BENNETT* I. Introduction The rule of law means literally what it says:
More informationPart II: The Nature of Law and Natural Law
Part II: The Nature of Law and Natural Law 3: LEGAL POSITIVISM AND THE SOURCES OF LAW * 1. THE NATURE OF LEGAL POSITIVISM The perennial and inexhaustible nature of the controversy concerning the positivist
More informationThe function of judge or the postmodernist challenge in contemporary legal philosophy Kelsen - Hart - Dworkin
The function of judge or the postmodernist challenge in contemporary legal philosophy Kelsen - Hart - Dworkin Jelica Šumič-Riha O ne of the main challenges of contemporary philosophy of law is to solve
More informationHART ON THE INTERNAL ASPECT OF RULES
HART ON THE INTERNAL ASPECT OF RULES John D. Hodson Introduction, Polycarp Ikuenobe THE CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN PHILOSOPHER John Hodson, examines what H. L. A. Hart means by the notion of internal aspect
More informationNOTE ON THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT AND THE DOCTRINE OF ACTS AND OMISSIONS For Philosophy 13 Fall, 2004
1 NOTE ON THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT AND THE DOCTRINE OF ACTS AND OMISSIONS For Philosophy 13 Fall, 2004 1. THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT The Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) holds that in some contexts
More informationJurisprudence for Hedgehogs
NELLCO NELLCO Legal Scholarship Repository New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers New York University School of Law 9-1-2013 Jurisprudence for Hedgehogs Jeremy Waldron NYU Law School,
More informationKEVIN WILDES has argued in a recent note that the distinction be-
Theological Studies 58 (1997) QUAESTIO DISPUTATA ORDINARY AND EXTRAORDINARY TREATMENTS: WHEN DOES QUALITY OF LIFE COUNT? GILBERT MEILAENDER [Editor's Note: Kevin Wildes recently argued in this journal
More informationReview of Developments in German, European and International Jurisprudence. Editors in Chief: Russell A. Miller; Peer C. Zumbansen
GERMAN LAW JOURNAL Review of Developments in German, European and International Jurisprudence Editors in Chief: Russell A. Miller; Peer C. Zumbansen Editors: Gregor Bachmann; Betsy Baker; Nina Boeger;
More informationTHE HERMENEUTICS OF H.L.A HART S POSITIVISM AND THE SEPARATION OF LAW AND MORALS
THE HERMENEUTICS OF H.L.A HART S POSITIVISM AND THE SEPARATION OF LAW AND MORALS Celestine Chukwuemeka Mbaegbu Department of Philosophy Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria ezeakilebuchi@gmail.com
More informationPlato s Republic Book 3&4. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Plato s Republic Book 3&4 Instructor: Jason Sheley What do we want out of a theory of Justice, anyway? The Trolley Problem The trolley problem: A trolley is running out of control down a track. In its
More informationLESSONS FOR THE SISTERS Lesson 1 The Importance of the Sisters in the Church Life
LESSONS FOR THE SISTERS Lesson 1 The Importance of the Sisters in the Church Life Scripture Reading: Gal. 3:28; 1 Cor. 12:13; 11:2-16; Matt. 1:16, 18; John 12:3; 20:1, 11-18; Luke 8:2-3; Acts 12:12 I.
More informationAMERICAN LAW REGISTER.
THE AMERICAN LAW REGISTER. JUNE, 1870. THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CASES OF INSANITY. We have read, with some degree of interest, and a sincere desire to arrive at truth, the article in the April number of
More informationWhy Legal Positivism?
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers Working Papers 2009 Why Legal Positivism? Brian Leiter Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/
More informationI may disappoint some of you when I say that the trolley problem I shall be talking about is not this one hard though it is, even after inspection of
TROLLEY PROBLEMS Bob Stone I may disappoint some of you when I say that the trolley problem I shall be talking about is not this one hard though it is, even after inspection of the area at the edge of
More informationA Framework for Thinking Ethically
A Framework for Thinking Ethically Learning Objectives: Students completing the ethics unit within the first-year engineering program will be able to: 1. Define the term ethics 2. Identify potential sources
More information10. The aim of a theory of law is to reduce chaos and multiplicity to unity. legal theory is science and not volition. It is knowledge of what the
PURE THEORY OF LAW 1. The Pure theory of Law which is also known as Vienna School of Legal Thought was propounded by Hans Kelson, a professor in Vienna (Austria) University. 2. Though the first exposition
More informationTHE SEPARATION OF LAW AND MORALS
Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive All Faculty Publications 1986-11-28 THE SEPARATION OF LAW AND MORALS Noel B. Reynolds Brigham Young University - Provo, nbr@byu.edu Follow this and additional
More information