1 Zarathushtra and Heraclitus Author(s): Lawrence Mills Source: Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, (Oct., 1902), pp Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: Accessed: 11/06/ :00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTORs Terms and Conditions of Use, available at. JSTORs Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact Cambridge University Press and Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
2 897 Art. XXIX.?Zarathushtra and Heraclitus. Lawrence Mills. By Professor Before the Logos of Heraclitus, as is usual in the cases of all originators, the was thing originated already present in its germ for his use in the half-formed surmises of his predecessors. For it was none other than Hesiod who used a word and expressed an idea1 which, together with the hints of other schemes, led up to the early concept. The first Greek naturalists believed, indeed, in an original substance of the universe, out of which arose everything and in which everything consisted; they also attributed to it life and motion, and gave it different names. One thought it was water. Another called it the infinite (sic),2 as undefined substance matter. At other times they thought it was air. Parmenides3 had spoken of trusting only the Logos, that is to say, reason, while distrusting the senses, imagination, etc. But this does not seem in itself to possess much speculative importance. He reduced everything to one in his philosophy, and denied development. He did not like the idea of motion,4 and had no conception of the consciousness of the Logos ; nor had Heraclitus this latter, for the matter of that. Parmenides natural philosophy was so bad that he believed in the stationary character of all things; and he earned the name of no-naturalist,?fyvaucos, from Aristotle. We have no analogy with either Asha or Vohumanah here. 1 " Op. 692, fj??rpa (pokdacrtooat, 718: tho abundant loveliness of the tongue that moves in rhythmic order." * Cf. the Avustu conception of infinite time. 8 Flourished in the 69th Olympiade, b.c. 4 See Heinze, p. 59, and Zellcr, pt. i, pp
3 898 ZARATHUSHTRA AND HERACLITUS. It was the keen discriminator of Ephesus1 who first saw a certain something imperative, not to say imperious, in the rhythm of nature, of its motions, and of its developments. I say of this great generalizer ; for we must concede him that title however much we may differ from his ultimate conclusions. Heraclitus did not indeed definitely resolve those secrets which the labours of all these centuries have only just succeeded in or discovering, rediscovering, but he came so near to this that we may fairly say that if he had possessed one fraction of the data which we now have, he would have surpassed most of us of these latter days in the depth of his intuition and in the keenness of his discrimination, for he seems to have surmised what we now know to be the true definition of heat, an overliving fire, kindling with regularity, burning out with regularity ; cf. the pkrpa <?>v\?(ra (Tda? of Hesiod. " The sun shall never pass his measure, for did he do so, the night goddesses, aid of justice, would find him out" (cf. Plut, de exil., ii, 604, B.). We do not distinctly gather that he held to any unchangeable underlying sub stance of phenomena. All is becoming with him, But surely one would think he must have seen that an eternal substance was necessary, the everlasting changing of the forms of which constitute perhaps existence, certainly creation and events. The one underlying substance which exists according to his ideas was what he called fire. We should call it heat, the eternal perpetual motion, that is to say, its mode. Nature moves in so far as it is subjected to, or better, in so far as it possesses caloric (sic), from the slowly dissolving ice to the electricity of the atmosphere; and the march of nature is rhythmic ; it has reason ; for all 1 Died about u.c. For his fragments see By waters masterly cditiou " quoted by Zoller, etc. (Clarendon Press, Oxford). Bcruays, Gesammelt*) " Abhaudl.," i, Bcruays, Hcrakl i tischen Briefe," " Lassallc, "Dio Pliilosophio des Ilcrnklcitos des Dukcln," Gladisch, Jloraklcitos und Zoroaster" (1859, autiquntcd). Schuster, "H. von Ephesus," " " Teichm?ller, Neue Stud. z. Gesch. d. Begriffe," i, E. Pflciderer, Dio " Philosophie des Heraklit," Patrick, Heraklitus," Baltimore, 1889, etc.
4 ZARATHUSHTRA AND HERACLITUS. 899 things adapt themselves each to tho other and fall into their places ; and out of the clash of seeming discord life, with all its developments, mental, emotional, and moral, arises ; there was reason in it, if not a reasoner. He called that reason logos (here in this application), meaning more a sentence than mere speech. And for this or discovery recognition a great Church father reckoned him among the fold of Christians before Christ ; " they who live according to, or " with the logos, are," said Justin, Christians, even if they were thought atheists ; and such were Socrates, Heraclitus, and the like and 1 among the Greeks." An incongruous grouping indeed, we should say, but one which perhaps shows the power of the Logos all the more. The moral order of the life of Heraclitus was thought of, but it was his theory which was the occasion of the remark. The idea of reason as inherent in nature dominated his philosophy. That philosophy indeed impresses us with its 1 one arising from two opposites, while the opposites become knowable only after the splitting of the unit into two. It was hardly, however, as some think,2 the march of motion by the sublated negation which Fichte and Hegel most prominently revived and elaborated.3 It was, moreover, wholly materialistic, let it be noted well. Although, as in the case of every similar supposition, we may always under stand materialism in a certain deeper and sublimer sense.4 For matter must have been regarded by Heraclitus as a thing which contains within its potentiality all that we know of mind or morals. The Logos of Heraclitus is the eternal law of motion in the strife of contending elements ; that is to say, in the embrace of opposites, splitting all things/ but putting the split together, and again the split, 1 See Justin Martyr, Apol., i, Sec Lnssallc. 3 Recall Hegels remark to the effect "that there is no sentence of Ilcraclitus which he had not embodied in his Logik" ; sec Patrick upon this. 4 Tho word naturally grates upon our cars nnd upon our feelings. But, after all, not ii single item iu the myriad experiences of sentiment if? denied by any of the so-called materialists. All must concede that if everything is material, then material also is everything, honour, mercy, devotion, everything arises from it, and intellect the first of all.
5 900 ZARATHUSHTRA AND HERACLITUS. r? peu o\a hiaip?ovres r? Se Sirjprjp?va cwrid?vres (see Philo qu. rer. " div. her., 1,505 f.). By strife alone life becomes possible, disease makes health good and pleasant. There is no harmony without the height and the depth (sic) (the 4 flat and the sharp ), and no peace without war." And this creative, war all-moving in nature was again the Logos under a different name and from another point of view. The Logos is also fate, not a blind fate by any manner of means. Fate as the Logos was the Creator (sic) of all things, from the or running together conflict of opposites. Justice is also war, and war is universal, everything takes place with strife. The just, or more properly the exact, is the cause and result of fire (i.e. heat) which is immanent; that is to say, permanently dwelling in the universe of nature ; for this heat has its law according to which it unfolds and again folds up the world ; that law is its rhythmic reason, or Logos. It is conceived of as material, as I have said, and the fire filled with spirit is another representation of the same Logos. This Logos is one and the same world - forming element as fire (i.e. heat), but viewed from different sides. The Logos is as little immaterial as fire. It is material; but then, as before said, matter must have been conceived of in a sense which has made it all inclusive, the sum-total, of universal subjective experience. And he called this comprehensive concept Logos, this being the first extended use of the term in this sense a by philosophical teacher in the history of Greek literature. Sextus Empiricus, in his work Adversus math., vii, 2, ff. 5, 397 If., quoted by Zeller and Ileinze, speaks of this as Logos the divine logos (seo H., p. 44), but he hardly meant to report the as expression having been used by Heraclitus ; the de?o? and de?ov are probably due solely to Sextus himself. And with all of this his was Logos unconscious. Such was most probably his opinion ; and possibly Von Hartmann started from some such hint. It, the was a Logos, reasonable force which inheres in the substance-matter of the world. There is nothing material without it. It has no pre-existence, except as all things pre-exist in their predecessors, of which they really form
6 ZARATHU6HTRA AND HERACLITUS. 901 a continuous part. It rules all things, and domineers over the realm of intellection and morality, eliminating all inde pendence from each of them. Such was, in a few words, the scheme, a perhaps little too much portrayed in the sense of Hegel by Zeller, and too much in the sense of mere nature by the other extremists.1 On the fascinating depths of it, with all its errors or its truth, we may not dwell, and in fact I make the above remarks (only) with reserve. But to one habituated to such investigation the gist of the matter is clear at once. "We have an astonishing and a pregnant scheme, strangely deep, yet strangely material. And this is the Logos which is supposed by some to have been the ancestor of Vohumanah or of Asha. We need hardly have waited for a full discussion of it before we decided whether such a Logos was likely to have been their or progenitor not. In some respects, indeed, both Asha and Vohumanah might have been proud of the connection ; but that is not our point just here. A radical historical connection of the nature of that between cause and effect is here not to be thought of. It is in the sphere of purely mental and, as we may also say, of moral action that, strange as it may appear, we find one delicate item of analogy, though I fear my readers will term it rather too far-fetched. Yet I present it for what it may be worth. As we find in the fragments of Heraclitus the first statement of a self-moving reasonable or reasoning force, so it is in the A vesta that we have, of all possible lores, the first record of the souls moral self-motion, if I might be permitted to make use of such a form of words,? a pulse of spiritual progress in the thought, in the word, and in the deed, from their inception in the first consciousness of a living subject to their consequences, felicitous or calamitous, first in the future of the present life, and then in a scene beyond it. For these states of moral habit seem actually to be continued on of themselves, not merely as the 1 Surely the progress of development by the superr.pssion of ideas through their opposites applies to natural as well as to ideas. In so far pheuomeua Uegel most was certainly right in speaking of Heraclitus as he did.
7 902 ZARATHUSHTRA AND HERACLITUS. occasions, but also as the constitutive elements of their own rewards or punishments in the present and in the future state. In Y. 30, 4, the worst mind seems really to be put into the place of the worst fate ; while the best mind is heaven, the passage having been beyond a doubt one of the sources, and perhaps the oldest surviving one, of the use of the word best* (vahisht) among the Persians for heaven. And distinct departments in the future spiritual home-life had the very words good thought, good word, and good deed for their names.1 It is the sinners own conscience which shrieks at him on the Judgment Bridge (see Y. 46) ; and it is his own good thoughts, words, and deeds which meet him and conduct him to his final happy destiny. Whether our full modern idea was really intended?i mean, of course, the idea that "virtue is its own reward "?we may indeed doubt. Zarathushtra would possibly have thought it too extreme a conception to be at all or practicable indeed safe ; regarding it as dangerously refined and calculated to suspend all whole some fear in inferior minds; but that it occurred to him, dimly at least and as if only to be instantly seems rejected, clear. At all events we have here a positively certain case where ideas, like events, cast their shadows before. These remarkable were suggestions the first of their kind, so far as I am aware, in the entire history of speculation, the incipient glimmering of the noblest idea that has ever emerged from the consciousness of man. And the analogy which I would draw is this ; and I confess it is an exceedingly subtle one, and only thrown in for a very esoteric circle. As Heraclitus was the first to formulate for us the idea of self-motion in the universe of nature physical, but as including more dimly the intellectual and moral world, so Zarathushtra gave us the first hint to our common, but so beautiful modern proverb, the idea of a sort of self-motion of moral economics or in the forces which control them. This, however, is the mere phantom of an analogy, striking though 1 See Yt. 22, Westergaard.
8 ZARATHUSHTRA AND HERACLITUS. 903 it be so far as it extends. It is indeed a likeness in the air ; and it is mentioned as an interlude and as if in a parenthesis alone. But aside from anything like this, to those who study the history of the idea of the Zarathushtrian asha, a certain general analogy with the Logos of Heraclitus, when also more closely understood, becomes perceptible. The idea, like its Indian counterpart rita, arose from the observed regularity of natural phenomena?the rising, course, decline, and disappearance of the sun and other heavenly bodies, the succession of the seasons, etc. These became imitated in the ceremonies of religious worship, and the priestly officials were termed the rtavan and the ashavan l ; and there, indeed, we have what reminds us of the Logos of Heraclitus in so far as it is likewise a rhythm. But as to what the rhythm of material nature actually was, the systems were poles apart. As Zeller himself admits, Heraclitus must have been somewhat aware of the nature of the widespread mazda-worship with which his successors were so familiar. For the Persian forces which looked to Auramazda for victory and hated Angra as Mainyu the author of defeat, surged for years up to the very gates of Ephesus when Heraclitus was in his prime. If he was even invited, as was believed by some, to the Court of Darius, then the false letters are the graphic echoes of the fact. It is therefore very probable indeed, that the stories of the two originally antagonistic divinities of the Persian creed assisted those early impulses which impelled this man of genius as he proceeded to improve still more upon the simple downright statements of the Zoroastrian oracle ; but this is only possible. The Zoroastrian dualism, a only by very wide inference, bears any marked likeness to its successor ; while on the other hand, no one of the known Greek ancients, so far as I am aware, had any conceivably immediate influence upon the plain though grander theory of Zarathushtra. Properly, as I would suggest, arshavan.
9 904 ZARATHUSHTRA AND HERACLITUS. With Zarathushtra opposition and war were indeed in the nature of things, for there were two original spirits ; this was the foundation of his views. But we find no emphatic suggestion with him that this was in any sense ordained for good.1 According to some passages the "evil are to lie forever in hell." If this, however, is to be modified by Yasna 30, 12, "Upon this shall there be salvation" (usht?,2 the beatific state), then we have indeed a happy result ; but there is no statement anywhere to the effect that the strife in nature was conducive to better things even when regarded a? an educator. Nor, in fact, is there any precise statements as to physical nature which are so conspicuous with the Ephesian. Undoubtedly antithesis is the keynote of Zarathushtrianism. Even in the G?thas we have conspicuously the beginning of the pairing. Opposite Ahura Mazda stands Angra Mainyu, the most formidable devil ever developed, actually the maker of one of the two opposing worlds. Opposite Asha, the regularity and truth, we have the Druj, the falsehood in the foe ; opposite vohu manah we have aka manah ; opposite vallista manah, achishta manah ; opposite Khshathra, the dush-khshathra ; opposite A ramaiti, taramaiti ; opposite Haurvatat and Ameretat?t we have descriptions of woe, as Garodman, heaven, is in the face of the Drujodman, hell ; while the eternal antipathetic antagonism between these forces is well expressed in the mutual repudiations of Yasna 45, 2. In the later Avesta and in the later Persian they become still more completely paired, and in the G?thas this conflict seems to have become accentuated by the miseries of warfare, that is to say, if the woes of the Kine were the echo of those of the people. If opposition of powers were the only points at issue, then the two systems were indeed related, and the dualism of Zarathushtra was only repeated in the war of Heraclitus. 1 Hero Zcllcr is correct, though his source of information was at that time so naturally imperfect and now completely antiquated. 3 Really in form adverbial.
10 ZARATHUSHTRA AND HERACLITUS. 905 Beyond this point, however, Heraclitus must have made great strides in a definitive philosophical sense. It is profoundly to be regretted that we possess such scanty remains of what he wrote or said. They do not occupy much more space than one of the longer GSthas, and not as much as some two of them together. Heraclitus made this opposition, which Zarathushtrianism also so fully delineates, to be the constitutive law out of which all existing things alone arise, while Zarathushtra only does this by inference, if at all. Here, however, we are not concerned with inferences. Zarathushtra showed the grouping faculty in a remarkable degree, and that compact hard reason which recognized even an horrific fact and an horrific being. He went no half way with his Satan. Heraclitus, however, went even beyond these views, and claimed the terrific in life to be not only its reality, but the source of its vitality. Zarathushtra worked out a clear polarization of all the good and evil elements in preceding systems, if systems they could in any sense be called. Out of all the gods he grouped all the chief abstracts deified into one small company, even resolving seven of them into one, as Sabellius formed his Trinity. And he grouped all the evil into equally limited masses, and there he left them to fight out their battle in the awful encounters of human and superhuman existence ; but Heraclitus quarrelled even with Homer because he seemed to dis approve too much of strife. There was one great question, however, in which they were : happily agreed nowhere do we see any indication that Zarathushtra ever supposed evil to inhere in matter, while Heraclitus went so far as to pronounce a materialistic pantheism. As to the fire of Heraclitus, when compared with that of Zarathushtra, it is indeed possible that the smoke of the altars in the Persian camps around his city which remained so loyal to the Persian cause, and the rumoured echoes of their Adar Yasht, or of its predecessors, may have attracted his attention ; and upon reflection this may well
11 906 ZARATHUSHTRA AND HERACLITUS. have confirmed his own convictions as to the supremo position of the mode of motion among the elements. If so, Zoroastrianism did another great service to the world, if only by an accideut ; but, of course, the sublime concept of Heraclitus went far beyond even the beautiful Zoroastrian worship of the holy thing, which was indeed far more with his successors than the mere altar fire, and should be fully recognized as heat, not flame alone, for we have its varieties at least in the later but still genuine Avesta, as interpreted by the later Zoroastrianism ; even the caloric seated in the was plants known as well as that in living creatures. But as to the two systems in their entirety, they were well-nigh contradictory opposites : Zoroasters (that is, Zarathushtras) was a harshly limited monotheism, if such a contradiction or confusion in terms can be to permitted, convey a popular idea. It had its good creation and creator in antithesis to its still more limited mono-demonism (so again) with its counter creation and Creator. That is to say, it offered two worlds and two quasi-independent deities ; its dualism in a certain sense anticipated the more philosophically stated one of Anaxagora8, of Plato, and then of Philo. But Heraclitus banished at once both God and devil. His gods were of a kin to men.1 The Logos of Heraclitus resembles the Asha of the Avesta, indeed, as the rhythm of law, and the latter became, let us not forget it, later actually a name for fire, though chiefly through the ritual, which was indeed an Asha by pre-eminence. But though the Fire-logos of Heraclitus must have been to some degree at least also touched by the universal sanctity of fire upon the altars in India and Persia,2 as even also, I must insist, in Greece, yet this Fire-l?gos was in so far radically different from that of the Avesta that it was in no sense whatsoever a created thing. With Heraclitus there was no creation with which to 1 " Recall his saying that none of the gods or men had made tho world." 3 Recollect that Persia was on tho way from India to Greece (on one at way least), and that the vast Indian philosophies and worship are actually parts ol the identical lore reached by Persiau sages. Tho Indians onco having positively lived in the Iran or near primieval it, and formed one identical race with the authors of the pre-gathic Gathas, if such a turn of speech may be allowed.
12 ZARATHUSHTRA AND HERACLITUS. 907 associate it, and no Creator, while both Asha and Vohumanah at their second (logical) stage as concepts were both freely said to be created by the great Good Being as whose attributes they first appeared; he made them as the hyposta tization in personification of the great moral instincts of law and of goodness. While, therefore, this identification of the Logos with the fire or heat should not disturb us much when heat is understood to be merely the vital force, yet, on the other hand, a self-moved ever-living power which contains within itself the reason of all that becomes, and has never had a beginning, is a thing presented in a very different light from the Asha of Ahura Mazda, even though it be by a figure (and only later) called His son. The Asha of Heraclitus, to use some violence in language, was, together with his Fire-logos, a reason-guided and guiding force which evolves all things out of?what? Out of itself?so it seems. But in the Avesta that fire was not at all originally identified with Asha, for the concepts in the G?thas show no such connection. And the systems which at first sight look so closely related spread in their developments still further, worlds apart. So that aside from internal characteristics as a rhythm of motion, nothing could be so different from either Asha or Vohumanah, or any of the Ameshaspends, as the Logos of the great Asiatic, magnificent though it may well be thought to be. Yet this concept of the bitter misanthropic, so heterogeneous from Avesta, formed the beginning of the Greek idea of logos, and influenced all future thought up to the very days of Philo.
Commentary on Professor Tweyman's 'Hume on Evil' Pheroze S. Wadia Hume Studies Volume XIII, Number 1 (April, 1987) 104-112. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES
Review: [Untitled] Reviewed Work(s): Problems from Kant by James Van Cleve Rae Langton The Philosophical Review, Vol. 110, No. 3. (Jul., 2001), pp. 451-454. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0031-8108%28200107%29110%3a3%3c451%3apfk%3e2.0.co%3b2-y
CHAPTER TEN: ZOROASTRIANISM Chapter Outline and Unit Summaries I. Introduction A. Zoroastrianism: One of the World s Oldest Living Religions B. Possesses Only 250,000 Adherents, Most Living in India C.
Leonhard Stejneger. Bergen, Norway, October 30, 1851-Washington, D. C., February 28, 1943 Author(s): Thomas Barbour Source: The Auk, Vol. 61, No. 2 (Apr., 1944), pp. 201-203 Published by: University of
Human Pre-Existence Author(s): J. Ellis McTaggart Source: International Journal of Ethics, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Oct., 1904), pp. 83-95 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2375828.
PART ONE Preparing For Battle 1 KNOW YOUR ENEMY Be sober, be watchful! For your adversary the Devil, as a roaring lion, goes about seeking someone to devour. Resist him, steadfast in the faith... 1 Peter
DEITY (PART II) * CHAPTER 8 Concepts of God/gods: pantheism monism monotheism IMMANENCE VS TRANSCENDENCE (P. 154) Immanence = to dwell within Transcendence = above or apart from God in nature God in the
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 : N A T U R E O F R E A L I T Y AGENDA 1. Review of Personal Identity 2. The Stuff of Reality 3. Materialistic/Physicalism 4. Immaterial/Idealism PERSONAL IDENTITY
What Is The Doctrine Of The Trinity? The doctrine of the Trinity is foundational to the Christian faith. It is crucial for properly understanding what God is like, how He relates to us, and how we should
2008 International Order Of Kabbalists ZOROASTRIANISM A COSMIC BATTLE By M.E. Henbury-Ballan (1989) The concept of an eternal battle between the forces of Good and Evil is ever present in the religions
A Message For The Ages The Need For Religion Prayer As Communion 1963 instructions for teaching the infinite way 6:2 550 You can bring yourself under Grace in this minute... Relinquish the desire for anything
Early Greek Philosophy THE PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHERS The term "Presocratic" is commonly used to refer to those early Greek thinkers who lived before the time of Socrates from approximately 600 to 400 B.C.
Process Theology Duane Fickeisen Lighting the Chalice Flame There are no whole truths; all truths are half-truths. It is trying to treat them as whole truths that plays the devil. A. N. Whitehead Introductions
5 Mental Healings in Modern Times Everyone is definitely concerned with the healing of bodily conditions and human affairs. What is it that heals? Where is this healing power? These are questions asked
Arthur Kok, Tilburg The Boundaries of Hegel s Criticism of Kant s Concept of the Noumenal Kant conceives of experience as the synthesis of understanding and intuition. Hegel argues that because Kant is
Chapter Six Aristotle s Theory of Causation and the Ideas of Potentiality and Actuality Key Words: Form and matter, potentiality and actuality, teleological, change, evolution. Formal cause, material cause,
Translation of Gathas The Holy Songs Of Zarathushtra By Mobed Firouz Azargoshasb www.zarathushtra.com Yasna 28 At the commencement of the Ahunuvaiti Gatha we read as follows: Holy Zarathushtra's entire
The Mystic Word "OM SWAMI PRABHAVANANDA FROM VEDIC TIMES until the present day the word "OM" has been taken as a symbol and as an aid to meditation by spiritual aspirants. It is accepted both as one with
Spinoza, Ethics 1 of 85 THE ETHICS by Benedict de Spinoza (Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata) Translated from the Latin by R. H. M. Elwes PART I: CONCERNING GOD DEFINITIONS (1) By that which is self-caused
Of the Nature of the Human Mind René Descartes When we last read from the Meditations, Descartes had argued that his own existence was certain and indubitable for him (this was his famous I think, therefore
Siger of Brabant Questions on Book III of the De anima 1 Regarding the part of the soul by which it has cognition and wisdom, etc. [De an. III, 429a10] And 2 with respect to this third book there are four
WHO IS GOD? THE GOSPEL COMPARED WITH HUMAN PHILOSOPHIES & RELIGIONS Notes For Week Five: Humanity & God Any serious religion must consider the nature of the relationship between God (or 'the gods') and
PLATO: PLATO CRITICIZES HIS OWN THEORY OF FORMS, AND THEN ARGUES FOR THE FORMS NONETHELESS (PARMENIDES) Socrates, he said, your eagerness for discussion is admirable. And now tell me. Have you yourself
Zoroastrian ethics and culture (Ética y cultura zoroastriana) Jafarey, A.* Resumen. La ética y la cultura zoroastriana deberían ser reconocidas como el inicio de la civilización que todos disfrutamos en
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF TRINITARIAN LIFE FOR US DENIS TOOHEY Part One: Towards a Better Understanding of the Doctrine of the Trinity THE RE-VITALISATION of the doctrine of the Trinity over the past century
Parmenides PHIL301 Prof. Oakes Winthrop University updated: 9/5/12 3:03 PM Parmenides and Philosophy - Parmenides represents a watershed in the history of Western philosophy. - The level of logical sophistication
- 1 - Divine Science and the Truth Doctrines of the New Religion Explained by an Earnest Believer Man and God Are One in Being, in Eternal Identity, Says This Scientific Creed. Nona L. Brooks (Newspaper
An Introduction to The Soul Journey Education for Higher Consciousness A 6 e-book series by Andrew Schneider What is the soul journey? What does The Soul Journey program offer you? Is this program right
Music, song and worship: A brief overview For a number of years I have taught a course surveying the history of the modern church at Westminster in California. One of the subjects we study early in the
Phil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141 Dialectic: For Hegel, dialectic is a process governed by a principle of development, i.e., Reason
THE ORGIN OF DEMONS. Rev. Robert T. Woodyard First Christian Reformed Church June 30, 2013, 6:00PM Sermon Texts: Isaiah 14:12-15; Jude 1:6 Belgic Confession, Article 12 Introduction. As I mentioned last
Introduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017 Beginnings of Philosophy: Overview of Course (1) The Origins of Philosophy and Relativism Knowledge Are you a self? Ethics: What is
Humility A Play in Three Acts. Ask any good Franciscan and they will tell you how proud they are to practice the virtue of humility. Humility is at the core of Franciscan spirituality. St. Francis expressed
1/6 The Resolution of the Antinomies Kant provides us with the resolutions of the antinomies in order, starting with the first and ending with the fourth. The first antinomy, as we recall, concerned the
Chapter 2 What is the Philosopher s Way? Socrates and the Examined Life CHAPTER SUMMARY The Western tradition in philosophy is mainly owed to the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greek philosophers of record began
There are two books laid before us to study, to prevent our falling into error; first, the volume of Scriptures, which revealed the will of God; then the volume of the Creatures, which expresses His power.
Doctrinal Statement of Grace Chapel Castle Rock I. CONCERNING THE HOLY SCRIPTURES We believe that the Scriptures (Old and New Testaments) are the inerrant Word of God. We believe in the verbal, plenary
Page1 The Age of the Enlightenment Written by: Dr. Eddie Bhawanie, Ph.D. The New Webster s Dictionary and Thesaurus gives the following definition of the Enlightenment ; an intellectual movement during
The Ontological Argument for the existence of God Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011 The ontological argument (henceforth, O.A.) for the existence of God has a long
SENSE-DATA 29 SENSE-DATA G. E. Moore Moore, G. E. (1953) Sense-data. In his Some Main Problems of Philosophy (London: George Allen & Unwin, Ch. II, pp. 28-40). Pagination here follows that reference. Also
Hegel G. J. Mattey Winter, 2008 / Philosophy 151 Philosophy and its History Hegel was the first modern philosopher to have taken the history of philosophy to be central to own philosophy. Aristotle had
Page 1 of 6 Ensign» 1971» November Zoroastrianism By Ellis T. Rasmussen Ellis T. Rasmussen, Zoroastrianism, Ensign, Nov 1971, 32 Alma the younger, full of zeal for the good way of life as he had received
Agathology Józef Tischner Translation of Wydarzenie spotkania. Agatologia [The Event of the Encounter. Agathology] in: Józef Tischner, Filozofia dramatu, Kraków: Znak 1998, pp. 63-69, 174-193. Translated
Review of Marianne Groulez. Le scepticisme de Hume: les Dialogues sur la religion naturelle Eléonore Le Jallé Hume Studies Volume 33, Number 1, (2007) 179 182. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates
The Nature of God: Part I Peter Kohut * 56 Essay ABSTRACT Using dialectic logic, not only the nature of the physical Universe but also the nature of God can be detected. God as I am is the highest, richest
The Present Age. Vol. III, Nov./Dec. 1938. No. 11/12 1 The Categories of Aristotle by W. J. Stein Only a fragment of the works of Aristotle has been handed down to us. This powerful master of the art of
HJFCI #4 God Carries Out His Plan J. Michalak 10-13-08; REV 10-13 Page 1 HJFCI #4: God Carries Out His Plan: I believe in God, the Father almighty, creator of heaven and earth CCC 268-354 268-274 The LORD
With our thoughts we make the world. Gautama Buddha To think is to create. Ernest Holmes, The Science of Mind of Spirit What is Affirmative Prayer? The Science of Mind & Spirit - Prayer, like meditation,
FACULTY OF ARTS B.A. Part II Examination, 2015-16 8. PHILOSOPHY SCHEME Two Papers Min. pass marks 72 Max. Marks 200 Paper - I 3 hrs duration 100 Marks Paper - II 3 hrs duration 100 Marks PAPER - I: HISTORY
Development of Thought The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek philosophia, which literally means "love of wisdom". The pre-socratics were 6 th and 5 th century BCE Greek thinkers who introduced
THE SPIRITUALIT ALITY OF MY SCIENTIFIC WORK Ignacimuthu Savarimuthu, SJ Director Entomology Research Institute Loyola College, Chennai, India Introduction Science is a powerful instrument that influences
Ludwig Feuerbach The Essence of Christianity (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes updated: 10/23/13 9:10 AM Section III: How do I know? Reading III.6 The German philosopher, Ludwig Feuerbach, develops a humanist
Spiritual Authority Prophetic Understanding Sam Soleyn Studio Session 15 01/2003 Now we have been speaking about spiritual warfare and we ve been looking at spiritual authority in the context of spiritual
Parkland College A with Honors Projects Honors Program 2011 Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Jason Ader Parkland College Recommended Citation Ader, Jason, "Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean
Independence and Dependence of Self-Consciousness 9 Part I Foundations 10 G. W. F. Hegel Independence and Dependence of Self-Consciousness 11 1 Independence and Dependence of Self-Consciousness G. W. F.
STUDIES IN ROMANS By B.H. Carroll, D.D., LL.D. THE SUNDAY SCHOOL BOARD of the SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION - 1935 - I. INTRODUCTION I. HOW WAS CHRISTIANITY ESTABLISHED IN THE CITY OF ROME? Doubtless many
Five Sample Logical Reasoning Questions and Explanations Directions: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one
P TILLICH ON IDOLATRY WILLIAM P. ALSTON* AUL TILLICH'S concept of idolatry, although it seems clear enough at first sight, presents on closer analysis some puzzling problems. Since this concept is quite
The Social Atom and Death J. L. Moreno Sociometry, Vol. 10, No. 1. (Feb., 1947), pp. 80-84. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0038-0431%28194702%2910%3a1%3c80%3atsaad%3e2.0.co%3b2-h Sociometry
On Interpretation By Aristotle Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak. First we must define the terms 'noun' and 'verb', then the terms 'denial' and 'affirmation',
On Interpretation Aristotle Translated by E. M. Edghill Section 1 Part 1 First we must define the terms noun and verb, then the terms denial and affirmation, then proposition and sentence. Spoken words
The Theology of John Calvin Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield [This essay appeared in a booklet published by the Presbyterian Board of Education in 1909] The subject of this address is the theology of John
AN ASSAULT ON THE GOSPEL Joseph Prince's Wholesale Rejection of Jesus's Teaching in the Gospels In an extraordinary passage of his book 'Destined to Reign', Joseph Prince teaches Christian believers not
The Hindu Heritage An Overview by Bansi Pandit Topics of Discussion Part I Introduction Scriptures Hindu View of God Hindu View of the Individual Hindu View of the World Major Doctrines Part II Caste System
Lecture 18: Rationalism I. INTRODUCTION A. Introduction Descartes notion of innate ideas is consistent with rationalism Rationalism is a view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification.
OUR ADVERSARY: SATAN Teacher: Yvon Prehn www.livelifebythebook.com CLARIFICATION NECESSARY Mormon view Jesus and Lucifer, spirit brothers Since both Christ and Lucifer were born of the Father, they were
Far Above All Ephesians 1:18-23 18 having the eyes of your hearts enlightened, that you may know what is the hope to which he has called you, what are the riches of his glorious inheritance in the saints,
The Making of a Modern Zoroastrianism Zoroaster, also known as Zarathustra, is credited as the founder of the religion that eventually became the dominant practice of ancient Persia. Probably living in
- 1 - Outline of NICOMACHEAN ETHICS, Book I Book I--Dialectical discussion leading to Aristotle's definition of happiness: activity in accordance with virtue or excellence (arete) in a complete life Chapter
1 Man's Search for the Meaning of Life In this study of Christian Evidences we will endeavor to evaluate the meaning of man's life in relationship to: God's over-all purpose for man, man's place in the
PHILOSOPHY AS THE HANDMAID OF RELIGION LECTURE 2/ PHI. OF THEO. I. Introduction A. If Christianity were to avoid complete intellectualization (as in Gnosticism), a philosophy of theology that preserved
Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses
You Are Most Blessed - Swami Omkarananda Beloved of the Infinite, Know Thyself You are infinitely more than everything you can know, feel, touch, own, use, possess, enjoy, wonder at. For, if there were
tests: white Myth and Religion Joseph Campbell Literalism can lead to Us versus Them My book s right and theirs is wrong! conflict between Religion and Science Skepticism about the received myths of our
SEED & BREAD FOR THE SOWER ISA. 55:10 FOR THE EATER BRIEF BIBLICAL MESSAGES FROM THE WORD OF TRUTH MINISTRY Otis Q. Sellers, Bible Teacher CONCERNING RESURRECTION It will be my purpose in this study to
Disclaimer Copyright 2013 by Kathleen Johnson All Rights Reserved Published by Quist Media The information contained in this publication and all associated information without limitations to brand associated
1 of 5 7/6/2011 1:14 AM Inayat Khan: On Sufism Sufism originated from the ancient school of Egyptian mysteries, a school which existed even before Abraham, the father of three great religions: Christianity,
Level 1-9 The Persian Empire Rob Waring Summary This book is about how two great emperors, Cyrus II and Darius I, created and ruled the Persian Empire. Contents Before Reading Think Ahead... 2 Vocabulary...
ASPECTS OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences IIT Madras MODULE ONE Ancient Greek Philosophy and Medieval Thought Chapter One Chapter Two Chapter