True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs
|
|
- Janel Hancock
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs Dr. Richard Spencer June, 2015
2 Our Purpose Theistic proofs and other evidence help to solidify our faith by confirming that Christianity is both true and reasonable. They are NOT the basis for our faith, but show that it is completely consistent with human reason, including science and history "I am not insane, most excellent Festus," Paul replied. "What I am saying is true and reasonable. Acts 26:25 In addition to strengthening our faith, proofs are of use in pre-evangelism; listen to Machen
3 J. Gresham Machen wrote in 1913, it would be a great mistake to suppose that all men are equally well prepared to receive the gospel. It is true that the decisive thing is the regenerative power of God. That can overcome all lack of preparation, and the absence of that makes even the best preparation useless. But as a matter of fact God usually exerts that power in connection with certain prior conditions of the human mind, and it should be ours to create, so far as we can, with the help of God, those favorable conditions for the reception of the gospel. False ideas are the greatest obstacles to the reception of the gospel. We may preach with all the fervor of a reformer and yet succeed only in winning a straggler here and there, if we permit the whole collective thought of the nation or of the world to be controlled by ideas which, by the resistless force of logic, prevent Christianity from being regarded as anything more than a harmless delusion. Under such circumstances, what God desires us to do is to destroy the obstacle at its root. as Christians we should try to mold the thought of the world in such a way as to make the acceptance of Christianity something more than a logical absurdity. J. Gresham Machen, Christianity and Culture, The Princeton Theological Review, Vol. 11, 1913
4 J. Gresham Machen wrote in 1913, it would be a great mistake to suppose that all men are equally well prepared to receive the gospel. It is true that the decisive thing is the regenerative power of God. That can overcome all lack of preparation, and the absence of that makes even the best preparation useless. But as a matter of fact God usually exerts that power in connection with certain prior conditions of the human mind, and it should be ours to create, so far as we can, with the help of God, those favorable conditions for the reception of the gospel. False ideas are the greatest obstacles to the reception of the gospel. We may preach with all the fervor of a reformer and yet Common succeed beliefs only in in our winning culture: a straggler here and there, if we permit the whole collective thought of the nation or of the world to be controlled by Spiritual ideas which, matters by the are resistless strictly personal force of and logic, whatever prevent works Christianity for from you being is fine, regarded but don t as bring anything it into more the public than a marketplace harmless delusion. of ideas Under All religions such circumstances, are equally valid what (or God invalid), desires we just to need do is to to avoid destroy the the obstacle radicals at its in any root. religion as Christians (i.e., those we who should truly try believe to mold it!) the thought Modern of science the world is in the such only a reliable way as methodology to make the acceptance for finding truth of Christianity about our something physical world more than a logical absurdity. All of life can be J. explained Gresham by Machen, some set Christianity of natural and processes Culture, The Princeton Theological Review, Vol. 11, 1913
5 Epistemology Outline How do we decide what is true? Faith and reason Rationality; belief, knowledge and warrant When does belief become knowledge? Is belief in Christianity reasonable? What is the foundation of proper Christian faith? What good are theistic proofs? Classic Theistic Proofs Other Theistic Proofs Modern evidence for the Christian worldview Apologetics
6 How Do We Decide What is True? Everyone has an ultimate standard for deciding what is true There are only two possible standards: Human reason (individual or collective) Divine revelation You can only defend your choice of ultimate standard by reference to that standard (although you obviously use human reason to do so in both cases more on that in a moment)
7 Human Reason or Divine Revelation? Human reason is, by all accounts, fallible and based on limited knowledge and understanding Divine revelation is based on the perfect and exhaustive knowledge of God Divine revelation is obviously the most rational standard, but that assumes that we are convinced that we have such revelation and can tell which one of the different proposed sources to believe, which necessarily uses human reason Therefore, it is impossible to escape using our reason, it just shouldn t be the ultimate standard
8 Thomas Aquinas and Reason Thomas Aquinas ( ) was the greatest of the Scholastics (sometimes called the Schoolmen) The Schoolmen were frequent targets of Calvin s attacks in The Institutes of the Christian Religion, but Aquinas also wrote much that is good He distinguished between things that man can determine from nature by the use of reason and those things that must be accepted by faith in divine revelation
9 Thomas Aquinas and Reason Aquinas wrote It was necessary for man s salvation that there should be a knowledge revealed by God, besides the philosophical sciences built up by human reason. Even as regards those truths about God which human reason can discover, it was necessary that man should be taught by a divine revelation, because the truth about God such as reason could discover would only be known by a few, and that after a long time, and with the admixture of many errors. Although those things which are higher than man s knowledge may not be sought for by man through his reason, nevertheless, once they are revealed by God they must be accepted by faith. Sum. Th., First Part, I, Q1
10 Thomas Aquinas and Reason Aquinas properly recognized that: 1. There is ample evidence (e.g., miracles, fulfilled prophecy, internal consistency) that the Scriptures are God s revelation to man 2. God s revelation is authoritative 3. Therefore, we must accept on faith the doctrines presented in the Bible So we use our reason in order to confirm that the Bible is God s revelation, but then we submit to the Bible and obey it; our reason is then used only to understand and apply what it teaches
11 Faith and Reason All worldviews are based on a combination of faith and reason In this case I am using the word faith to mean to believe something without proof, but it implicitly includes trust since all decisions depend on our worldview Reason simply means to draw conclusions based on the proper use of logic and evidence, all of which is subject to our presuppositions Gödel showed that provability is a weaker notion than truth Douglass Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, pg. 19
12 An Example Worldview Rudolf Bultmann s said it is impossible to use electrical light and the wireless and to avail ourselves of modern medical and surgical discoveries, and at the same time to believe in the New Testament world of spirits and miracles. Kerygma and Myth, Harper and Row, 1961, pg. 5 What can we conclude? Bultmann assumed, by faith, that modern science is, or would soon be, able to explain all of existence without reference to God and, therefore, the physical world is all that really exists He still spoke of salvation, but it is hard to know how he held such a view given his materialistic assumptions. He needed to hear Paul, Why should any of you consider it incredible that God raises the dead? (Acts 26:8)
13 Belief and Knowledge We can believe things to be true, and we can have what we call knowledge; what is the difference? A belief may be true or false, but even if it is true it does not necessarily constitute knowledge (e.g., I may believe that a particular stock is going to go up, but that is not knowledge even if it turns out to be true) For a belief to reasonably be called knowledge, it must have warrant, i.e., there must be good reason to think it is true, not just probable
14 Is Belief in Christianity Reasonable? Philosophers speak of properly basic beliefs A properly basic belief is a belief which is not derived inferentially from any more foundational belief but which is rationally justified by being formed in appropriate circumstances. W.L. Craig In general, properly basic beliefs are still subject to defeaters ; that is, opposing arguments so strong that it would be irrational to ignore them But, Craig, Plantinga and others argue that Christian belief grounded in the witness of the Holy Spirit has such strong warrant that it simply overwhelms any proposed defeater (it is a defeater for all defeaters)
15 Examples of Properly Basic Beliefs Examples of properly basic beliefs: Solipsism is false The world is more than five minutes old But not everyone will agree about which beliefs are properly basic The issue is one of rationality; are you irrational to hold a particular belief? The answer is not based on whether or not you can prove the belief, either to yourself or to someone else
16 Example of a Properly Basic Belief William Lane Craig wrote about a Christian college professor at Wheaton who told the class that if he were persuaded that Christianity were unreasonable, he would abandon it. Craig responded: Now that frightened and troubled me. For me, Christ was so real and had invested my life with such significance that I could not make the confession of my professor if somehow through my studies my reason were to turn against my faith, then so much the worse for my reason! Thus, I confided to one of my philosophy teachers, I guess I m not a true intellectual. If my reason turned against Christ, I d still believe. My faith is too real. Five Views on Apologetics, pg 27
17 Don t be Bullied or Intimidated! You need to know the true Triune God of the Bible personally, and then be firm in your understanding that such a belief is entirely rational; in fact, all other worldviews are irrational! Let s consider a simple example of how you shouldn t let supposed proofs sway you from what you know to be true
18 Consider the Following Proof 20 = = = = = = = = 5 0 = 1 Is anyone convinced?
19 Unshakable Faith We should have the same unshakable faith in God and his Word; if evidence or argument is presented that contradicts it, we should simply be able to say that we know it is wrong even if we can t see how or why But, we should also strive to learn as much as we can and think as carefully as we can so that we are prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks [us] to give the reason for the hope that [we] have. (1 Peter 3:15)
20 A Fully Warranted Belief To see another example of a fully warranted belief (one that you can believe with absolute intellectual integrity independent of any opposing evidence), consider being accused of a crime you didn t commit, like Richard Kimble No amount of evidence would shake your belief in your innocence, and your belief is fully warranted and, in fact, constitutes true knowledge
21 Proper Use of Reason We are made in God s image His Word implicitly and explicitly assumes and demands that we use the reason he gave us, but we are to use it in the service of truth to understand God s Word (ministerial), not to stand over God s Word and judge whether or not it is true (magisterial) Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD. Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool. Isaiah 1:18
22 Proper Use of Reason We are made in God s image His Word implicitly and explicitly assumes and demands that we use the reason he gave us, but we are to use it in the service of truth to understand God s Word (ministerial), not to stand over God s Word and judge whether or not it is true (magisterial) Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is his good, pleasing and perfect will. Rom 12:2
23 Proper Use of Reason R. C. Sproul lists four essential principles of knowledge R.C. Sproul, Defending your Faith, Crossway, 2003 These are NOT part of some standard of truth to which God s revelation is submitted, but they are God-given tools to understand his revelation The Bible itself (and therefore God) presupposes these four principles in communicating truth to us Sproul argues that virtually all atheists at some point attack one or more of these principles
24 The Four Principles of Knowledge The law of noncontradiction A cannot be A and non-a at the same time and in the same sense or relationship The law of causality Every event has a cause (every effect must have a cause is a tautology) It is NOT that everything must have a cause! In fact, something, or someone, must be eternal and uncaused (self existent) The basic (not infallible) reliability of sense perception The analogical use of language We are made in God s image and can understand some things about God, albeit imperfectly, by analogy It is NOT pious to say that God transcends logic and then embrace contradictions; God defines logic
25 The Law of Noncontradiction While not truly post-modern in the fullest sense, much of our modern culture, especially in academia, accepts some degree of relativism Something can be true for me, but not for you The Swiss theologian Emil Brunner went so far as to say that contradiction is the hallmark of truth Sproul responds: If contradiction is a hallmark of truth, then there is no way we can differentiate between right and wrong, good and evil, obedience and disobedience.
26 The Law of Noncontradiction The Bible clearly assumes this law of logic to be true If In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, then certain truths necessarily follow: e.g., the universe is not eternal, but contingent In arguing for the importance of the historical resurrection of Christ in 1 Corinthians 15, Paul assumes this law: If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. (v 13) Paul argues that to believe that which is contradictory to fact is to believe in vain We could give innumerable other examples In fact, any real communication assumes this law
27 The Law of Causality Everything (or everyone) that is not eternal and self existent (i.e., not eternally dependent on someone or something else), must have a cause David Hume attacked our ability to discern the real causes behind particular effects he was certainly right that it can be difficult, but the law still stands whether we find the right cause or not The Bible again assumes this law universally God tells us many times that HE created the universe Miracles are used as signs precisely because we know everything must have a sufficient cause, and some events cannot be naturally caused
28 The Basic Reliability of Sense Perception We are all aware that our senses can deceive us any good illusionist can confirm that But the idea that our senses provide basically reliable information if we are careful is an essential belief to function in life and is as much a tenet of modern science as it is of the Bible The Bible assumes it universally: The use of miracles as signs assumes that we aren t just deceived The evidence given of Christ s resurrection assumes the reliability of our sense perception
29 The Analogical Use of Language We are concerned with knowledge of God is he somehow beyond human language? Can we make intelligible, true, statements about him? Logical positivism is dead: If only those statements that can be empirically verified have meaning, then this statement itself is meaningless We are made in God s image and can understand much by way of analogy, for example: We understand power, even though we are not omnipotent We understand being, even though we are not eternal and self existent We understand love, truth, and other attributes of God even though we do not possess any of them to the ultimate degree
30 What is the Proper Foundation of Christian Faith? The proper foundation of our faith is not evidence and arguments, it is the transforming work and inner witness of the Holy Spirit confirming in our hearts that God s Word is true The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children. Romans 8:16 If rational argument and evidence are the foundation of your faith, it will be shaken every time someone more clever or knowledgeable than you questions your faith!
31 Set Your Feet on Solid Ground Jesus said everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. Matt 7:24-25 So put God s words into practice sin is the cause of much doubt! Assurance depends on obedience Increase your love for God, his Word and his church, participate in the life of the body and walk in holiness
32 So What Good are Theistic Proofs? To summarize things we have said: Theistic proofs strengthen our faith and witness by giving us confidence that the Christian faith is both true and reasonable Theistic proofs help us to think carefully and logically, which pleases God By thinking clearly and then speaking and writing in the public domain Christians can influence the world and, in particular, create an environment in which people are more receptive to the gospel These proofs can be used themselves in pre-evangelism
33 Classic Theistic Proofs We will begin with Anselm and Aquinas, but will also give more modern versions of their proofs We will then move on to discuss many other types of evidence for the truth of the Bible and the Christian worldview Not all of these arguments have equal weight for all of us! But it is good to use our minds One good summary of much of the information we will cover is: Reasonable Faith by William Lane Craig, Crossway, Revised Ed., 1994
God has a mind- Romans 11:34 "who has known the mind of the Lord
Basic Logic God has a mind- Romans 11:34 "who has known the mind of the Lord God thinks- Isaiah 55:9 as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my thoughts than (yours) Note: God does not have a
More informationTHE INTERNAL TESTIMONY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THE BIBLE IS GOD S WORD?
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Feature Article: JAF6395 THE INTERNAL TESTIMONY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THE BIBLE IS GOD S WORD? by James N. Anderson This
More informationWEEK 4: APOLOGETICS AS PROOF
WEEK 4: APOLOGETICS AS PROOF 301 CLASS: PRESUPPOSITIONAL APOLOGETICS BY PROFESSOR JOE WYROSTEK 1 Corinthians 1:10-17 (NIV), 10 I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,
More informationIDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?
IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All? -You might have heard someone say, It doesn t really matter what you believe, as long as you believe something. While many people think this is
More informationPresuppositional Apologetics
by John M. Frame [, for IVP Dictionary of Apologetics.] 1. Presupposing God in Apologetic Argument Presuppositional apologetics may be understood in the light of a distinction common in epistemology, or
More informationA Case for Christianity
Introduction to Christian Apologetics A Case for Christianity By J.R. Allebach A Case for Christianity Bibliography Holy Scripture The Origin of the Bible, Philip Wesley Comfort The Reasonableness of Faith,
More informationSelf-Refuting Statements
Self-Refuting Statements 2016 M. S. Turner Often when Christians are sharing their faith, they are challenged by skeptics, agnostics, and non-believers with statements that are selfrefuting. A self-refuting
More information1/5. The Critique of Theology
1/5 The Critique of Theology The argument of the Transcendental Dialectic has demonstrated that there is no science of rational psychology and that the province of any rational cosmology is strictly limited.
More informationKant and his Successors
Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics
More informationClassical Apologetics:
Classical Apologetics: It Stands to Reason Historical Roots of Classical Apologetics 1 Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy
More informationThe Value of Christian Doctrine and Apologetics
The Value of Christian Doctrine and Apologetics Dr. Michael Gleghorn makes a case for why Christian doctrine and apologetics are important for spiritual growth and maturity. Just prior to beginning college,
More informationTheme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS
A. Inductive arguments cosmological Inductive proofs Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS the concept of a posteriori. Cosmological argument: St Thomas Aquinas first Three Ways 1.
More informationLogic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationAre Miracles Identifiable?
Are Miracles Identifiable? 1. Some naturalists argue that no matter how unusual an event is it cannot be identified as a miracle. 1. If this argument is valid, it has serious implications for those who
More informationPhilosophy of Religion. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Religion Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationFOLLOWING CHRIST IN THE WORLD
FOLLOWING CHRIST IN THE WORLD CHAPTER 1 Philosophy: Theology's handmaid 1. State the principle of non-contradiction 2. Simply stated, what was the fundamental philosophical position of Heraclitus? 3. Simply
More informationSt. Anselm s versions of the ontological argument
St. Anselm s versions of the ontological argument Descartes is not the first philosopher to state this argument. The honor of being the first to present this argument fully and clearly belongs to Saint
More informationFirst Principles. Principles of Reality. Undeniability.
First Principles. First principles are the foundation of knowledge. Without them nothing could be known (see FOUNDATIONALISM). Even coherentism uses the first principle of noncontradiction to test the
More informationApologetics. (Part 1 of 2) What is it? What are a couple of the different types? Is one type better than the other?
Apologetics by Johan D. Tangelder (Part 1 of 2) What is it? What are a couple of the different types? Is one type better than the other? The need to defend Christianity against its accusers is as great
More informationIn Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg
1 In Search of the Ontological Argument Richard Oxenberg Abstract We can attend to the logic of Anselm's ontological argument, and amuse ourselves for a few hours unraveling its convoluted word-play, or
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationDo we have knowledge of the external world?
Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our
More informationIn Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationThe Ontological Argument for the existence of God. Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011
The Ontological Argument for the existence of God Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011 The ontological argument (henceforth, O.A.) for the existence of God has a long
More informationWhy Study Christian Evidences?
Chapter I Why Study Christian Evidences? Introduction The purpose of this book is to survey in systematic and comprehensive fashion the many infallible proofs of the unique truth and authority of biblical
More informationCataloging Apologetic Systems. Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.
Cataloging Apologetic Systems Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 1 According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy Systems Stressing Natural
More informationGetting Deeper: Discussion and Activities
Getting Deeper: Discussion and Activities Getting Deeper: Discussion and Activities 1 Introduction Key verse to memorize: 1 Peter 3:15 1. Read 1 Peter 3:15 together again. Explain the significance of the
More informationAnswering Tough Questions
Answering The Tough Questions Pastor Tim Carpenter Bethany Church! Welcome to everyone - Skeptics and Believers! E-mail distribution list for updates/resources! Methodology and Overall goals for the class!
More informationMixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ. 1 Corinthians 9:
Mixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ 1 Corinthians 9:19-23 01.23.13 Francis Schaeffer I do not believe there is any one apologetic which meets the needs of all people. And,
More informationThe Rationality of Religious Beliefs
The Rationality of Religious Beliefs Bryan Frances Think, 14 (2015), 109-117 Abstract: Many highly educated people think religious belief is irrational and unscientific. If you ask a philosopher, however,
More informationAtheism From the University to Society. Edwin Chong. April 2, 2006
Atheism From the University to Society Edwin Chong April 2, 2006 CTF, April 2 2006 Hebrews 11:6 And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists
More informationHume s Critique of Miracles
Hume s Critique of Miracles Michael Gleghorn examines Hume s influential critique of miracles and points out the major shortfalls in his argument. Hume s first premise assumes that there could not be miracles
More informationANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION
Christian Apologetics Journal, 11:2 (Fall 2013) 2013 Southern Evangelical Seminary Reviews Norman L. Geisler, Ph.D. Reading the articles by Drs. Jason Lisle, Scott Oliphint, and Richard Howe was like watching
More informationIdeas Have Consequences
Introduction Our interest in this series is whether God can be known or not and, if he does exist and is knowable, then how may we truly know him and to what degree. We summarized the debate over God s
More informationThy Word is Truth by E.J. Young. Session 1 Presented by Dr. Richard Spencer
Thy Word is Truth by E.J. Young Session 1 Presented by Dr. Richard Spencer Introduction Young states his purpose clearly: To acquaint the intelligent layman with the Biblical doctrine of inspiration and
More informationWHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?
WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL? Beliefs don t trump facts in the real world. People almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.
More informationIntroduction to Apologetics-Part VI
Introduction to Apologetics-Part VI Course modeled after Frank Turek and Norman Geisler s I Don t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist curriculum, with additional materials from William Lane Craig, J.P.
More informationReview of: Mark Johnston, Saving God: Religion after Idolatry, Princeton University Press, 2009 *
Review of: Mark Johnston, Saving God: Religion after Idolatry, Princeton University Press, 2009 * Daniel von Wachter ** 3 January, 2011 The content of the book The thesis of this book is that religions,
More informationWelcome back to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Together.
Welcome back to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Together. Last week we started considering some rational theistic proofs for the existence of God with particular reference to those intellectual barriers
More informationEvidence and Transcendence
Evidence and Transcendence Religious Epistemology and the God-World Relationship Anne E. Inman University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Copyright 2008 by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame,
More informationIs the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible?
Is the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible? Anders Kraal ABSTRACT: Since the 1960s an increasing number of philosophers have endorsed the thesis that there can be no such thing as
More informationMan and the Presence of Evil in Christian and Platonic Doctrine by Philip Sherrard
Man and the Presence of Evil in Christian and Platonic Doctrine by Philip Sherrard Source: Studies in Comparative Religion, Vol. 2, No.1. World Wisdom, Inc. www.studiesincomparativereligion.com OF the
More informationDefinition: The denial of the possibility of knowledge, philosophy, and value in anything.
Christoph Koehler Roundtable of Ideologies Spring 2009 Nihilism 1 Definition: The denial of the possibility of knowledge, philosophy, and value in anything. Prominent Philosophers: Friedrich Nietzsche,
More informationChapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1
Chapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 In chapter 1, Clark reviews the purpose of Christian apologetics, and then proceeds to briefly review the failures of secular
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationElementary Doctrines Resurrection of the Dead. Studio Session 38 Sam Soleyn 01/2004
Elementary Doctrines Resurrection of the Dead Studio Session 38 Sam Soleyn 01/2004 As we continue our studies on the Elementary Doctrines I would suspect that no doctrine is more foundational than the
More informationPROPHECIES MIRACLES AND CATHOLIC APOLOGETICS: SUMMARY OF PROOFS IN CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS
CATHOLIC APOLOGETICS: PROPHECIES AND MIRACLES 5 Who was the greatest messenger of God to mankind? His own Divine Son, Jesus Christ, Our Lord, true God, true Man. Born of the Virgin Mary, He lived and worked
More informationA Fundamental Thinking Error in Philosophy
Friedrich Seibold A Fundamental Thinking Error in Philosophy Abstract The present essay is a semantic and logical analysis of certain terms which coin decisively our metaphysical picture of the world.
More information7/31/2017. Kant and Our Ineradicable Desire to be God
Radical Evil Kant and Our Ineradicable Desire to be God 1 Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Kant indeed marks the end of the Enlightenment: he brought its most fundamental assumptions concerning the powers of
More information2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature
Introduction The philosophical controversy about free will and determinism is perennial. Like many perennial controversies, this one involves a tangle of distinct but closely related issues. Thus, the
More informationMidway Community Church "Hot Topics" Young Earth Presuppositionalism: Handout 1 1 Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.
Midway Community Church "Hot Topics" 1 Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. I. First Things A. While perhaps most Christians will understand something about how the expression 'young earth' is used (especially with
More informationIntelligent Design. What Is It Really All About? and Why Should You Care? The theological nature of Intelligent Design
Intelligent Design What Is It Really All About? and Why Should You Care? The theological nature of Intelligent Design Jack Krebs May 4, 2005 Outline 1. Introduction and summary of the current situation
More informationTheories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and
1 Internalism and externalism about justification Theories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and externalist. Internalist theories of justification say that whatever
More informationBible Study on Christian Apologetics
1 Bible Study on Christian Apologetics First of six studies The basic principles of Christian apologetics may be summarized as follows: 1. Christian apologetics must be based on God s word. 2. Christian
More informationDelton Lewis Scudder: Tennant's Philosophical Theology. New Haven: Yale University Press xiv, 278. $3.00.
[1941. Review of Tennant s Philosophical Theology, by Delton Lewis Scudder. Westminster Theological Journal.] Delton Lewis Scudder: Tennant's Philosophical Theology. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1940.
More informationEPISTEMOLOGY for DUMMIES
EPISTEMOLOGY for DUMMIES Cary Cook 2008 Epistemology doesn t help us know much more than we would have known if we had never heard of it. But it does force us to admit that we don t know some of the things
More informationHistory and the Christian Faith Contributed by Michael Gleghorn
History and the Christian Faith Contributed by Michael Gleghorn History and the Christian Faith The Importance of History Can we really know anything at all about the past? For example, can we really know
More informationHUME, CAUSATION AND TWO ARGUMENTS CONCERNING GOD
HUME, CAUSATION AND TWO ARGUMENTS CONCERNING GOD JASON MEGILL Carroll College Abstract. In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Hume (1779/1993) appeals to his account of causation (among other things)
More informationApologetics. by Johan D. Tangelder
Apologetics (Part 2 of 2) Scripture tells us that the Gospel message is foolishness to those who are perishing. But if that is true, if unbelievers will find the Gospel foolish, then how do we tell them
More informationIntroduction to Apologetics-Part II
Introduction to Apologetics-Part II Course modeled after Frank Turek and Norman Geisler s I Don t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist curriculum, with additional materials from William Lane Craig, J.P.
More informationDoes God Exist? Understanding arguments for the existence of God. HZT4U1 February
Does God Exist? Understanding arguments for the existence of God HZT4U1 February 19 2016 The Ontological Argument for the existence Ontological : of God The Ontological Argument for the existence of God
More informationHigh School / College Sample Questions Reason for Belief Norman L Geisler. (Updated 14 JUL 2016)
High School / College Sample Questions Reason for Belief Norman L Geisler (Updated 14 JUL 2016) It should be noted that these are sample questions only. In the past often the questions on the day of the
More informationNOT CLASSICAL, COVENANTAL
NOT CLASSICAL, COVENANTAL CLASSICAL APOLOGETICS Generally: p. 101 "At their classical best, the theistic proofs are not merely probable but demonstrative". Argument for certainty. By that is meant that
More informationPresuppositional Apologetics
Presuppositional Apologetics Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 1 According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Revelation Augustine AD 354-AD 430 John Calvin 1509-1564 Abraham Kuyper
More informationJesus and the Inspiration of Scripture
Jesus and the Inspiration of Scripture By Gary R. Habermas Central to a Christian world view is the conviction that Scripture, both the Old and New Testaments, comprises God's word to us. What sort of
More informationHistory and the Christian Faith
History and the Christian Faith For many people in our world today history, as Henry Ford once said, is bunk. Indeed, some people go so far as to say that we really can t know anything at all about the
More informationQUESTIONS BUDDHISM MUST ANSWER
QUESTIONS BUDDHISM MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS WHAT DID BUDDHA SAY AGAIN? If Buddhists themselves cannot agree on which scriptural writings or traditions for practice are actually true statements from Buddha,
More informationSPIRITUAL SETUPS ~Presuppositions About God and Us that set us up for differing views about spirituality~
SPIRITUAL SETUPS ~Presuppositions About God and Us that set us up for differing views about spirituality~ The following sets of ideas contain different presuppositions or assumptions that function as foundation
More informationDuns Scotus on Divine Illumination
MP_C13.qxd 11/23/06 2:29 AM Page 110 13 Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination [Article IV. Concerning Henry s Conclusion] In the fourth article I argue against the conclusion of [Henry s] view as follows:
More informationThe Paradox of the stone and two concepts of omnipotence
Filo Sofija Nr 30 (2015/3), s. 239-246 ISSN 1642-3267 Jacek Wojtysiak John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin The Paradox of the stone and two concepts of omnipotence Introduction The history of science
More informationAquinas' Third Way Modalized
Philosophy of Religion Aquinas' Third Way Modalized Robert E. Maydole Davidson College bomaydole@davidson.edu ABSTRACT: The Third Way is the most interesting and insightful of Aquinas' five arguments for
More informationThe Wise Builder (Matthew 24-27) 1
The Wise Builder (Matthew 24-27) 1 1) Read Text 2) Pray 3) Introduction Illustration: The House on the Rock Point: The fact that the house was built on, and anchored into the rock was assuring to me. In
More informationGetting To God. The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism. truehorizon.org
Getting To God The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism truehorizon.org A True Worldview A worldview is like a set of glasses through which you see everything in life. It is the lens that brings
More informationEpistemology. PH654 Bethel Seminary Winter To be able to better understand and evaluate the sources, methods, and limits of human knowing,
Epistemology PH654 Bethel Seminary Winter 2009 Professor: Dr. Jim Beilby Office Hours: By appointment AC335 Phone: Office: (651) 638-6057; Home: (763) 780-2180; Email: beijam@bethel.edu Course Info: Th
More informationHas Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 7714 Volume 3 Issue 11 ǁ November. 2014 ǁ PP.38-42 Has Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
More informationCOPLESTON: Quite so, but I regard the metaphysical argument as probative, but there we differ.
THE MORAL ARGUMENT RUSSELL: But aren't you now saying in effect, I mean by God whatever is good or the sum total of what is good -- the system of what is good, and, therefore, when a young man loves anything
More informationA CASE FOR APOLOGETICS by Brian Auten What is Apologetics?
A CASE FOR APOLOGETICS by Brian Auten www.apologetics315.com What is Apologetics? The word apologetics comes from the Greek word apologia, which is found seventeen times in the New Testament. It can be
More informationA Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena
A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena 2017 by A Jacob W. Reinhardt, All Rights Reserved. Copyright holder grants permission to reduplicate article as long as it is not changed. Send further requests to
More informationMarcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC. Introduction
RBL 09/2004 Collins, C. John Science & Faith: Friends or Foe? Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 2003. Pp. 448. Paper. $25.00. ISBN 1581344309. Marcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC
More informationOf Skepticism with Regard to the Senses. David Hume
Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses David Hume General Points about Hume's Project The rationalist method used by Descartes cannot provide justification for any substantial, interesting claims about
More information[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW
[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW Craig S. Keener, Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts (2 vols.; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011). xxxviii + 1172 pp. Hbk. US$59.99. Craig Keener
More informationFoundations for Living Lesson Objectives
Unit 1: WHAT IS A BIBLICAL WORLDVIEW? Introduction to Worldview Define worldview and explain how worldviews are developed Compare and contrast secular and Biblical worldviews Ancient Greek Worldview: Government
More informationSaving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationWhat one needs to know to prepare for'spinoza's method is to be found in the treatise, On the Improvement
SPINOZA'S METHOD Donald Mangum The primary aim of this paper will be to provide the reader of Spinoza with a certain approach to the Ethics. The approach is designed to prevent what I believe to be certain
More informationKantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies
A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment
More informationCLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH
CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH I. Challenges to Confirmation A. The Inductivist Turkey B. Discovery vs. Justification 1. Discovery 2. Justification C. Hume's Problem 1. Inductive
More informationCan a Machine Think? Christopher Evans (1979) Intro to Philosophy Professor Douglas Olena
Can a Machine Think? Christopher Evans (1979) Intro to Philosophy Professor Douglas Olena First Questions 403-404 Will there be a machine that will solve problems that no human can? Could a computer ever
More informationMiracles. Miracles: What Are They?
Miracles Miracles: What Are They? Have you noticed how often the word miracle is used these days? Skin creams that make us look younger; computer technology; the transition of a nation from oppression
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationWHY DO YOU FIND IT SO DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE?
1 WHY DO YOU FIND IT SO DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE? If anyone chooses to do God s will, he will find out whether My teaching comes from God or whether I speak on My own (John 7:17). As a scientist can reveal
More informationContemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies
Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies ST503 LESSON 14 of 24 John S. Feinberg, Ph.D. Experience: Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. In
More informationA CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment
A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE A Paper Presented to Dr. Douglas Blount Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for PHREL 4313 by Billy Marsh October 20,
More informationJohn Drury. Qualifying Exam in Philosophy for the Theology Department. May 30, 2007
John Drury Qualifying Exam in Philosophy for the Theology Department May 30, 2007 3. What arguments can be brought against the concept of distributive (as opposed to retributive) justice? Are they convincing?
More informationLesson 2 The Existence of God Cause & Effect Apologetics Press Introductory Christian Evidences Correspondence Course
Lesson 2 The Existence of God Cause & Effect Apologetics Press Introductory Christian Evidences Correspondence Course THE EXISTENCE OF GOD CAUSE & EFFECT One of the most basic issues that the human mind
More informationDefend Your Faith Lesson 1
Defend Your Faith Lesson 1 IS FAITH REASONABLE? but sanctify in your hearts Christ as Lord: being ready always to give answer to every man that asketh you a reason concerning the hope that is you, yet
More informationEvidences for Christian Beliefs
Evidences for Christian Beliefs Date Day Lesson Title Teacher 7 Jan 17 Sun 1 Understanding Faith Marty 10 Jan 17 Wed 2 The Christian's Faith Marty 14 Jan 17 Sun 3 The Universe: God's Power & Deity Marty
More informationis the edification of Christians. Clark asks some very penetrating questions, such as: Is it necessary to have saving faith?
Book Report: Faith and Saving Faith by Gordon H. Clark Gordon Clark s book Faith and Saving Faith, is a short monograph on a topic that is as pertinent now as it was when Clark wrote it. The motivation
More informationTHE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS. bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science
THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science WHY A WORKSHOP ON FAITH AND SCIENCE? The cultural divide between people of faith and people of science*
More informationLesson 6: The Doctrine of God: The Existence of God
Lesson 6: The Doctrine of God: The Existence of God How do we know that God exists? The existence of God is the foundation of true religion. If we do not have a right understanding of the existence of
More information