MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL
|
|
- Valentine Leonard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 0 0 CHARLES V. BERWANGER (SBN ) GORDON AND REES 0 West Broadway, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 T: () -00 F: () - cberwanger@gordonrees.com Attorneys for Defendant and Real Party in Interest MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION *Additional counsel listed on signature pages STEVE TRUNK and PHILIP K. PAULSON, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, Real Party In Interest. JEWISH WAR VETERANS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., RICHARD A. SMITH, MINA SAGHEB AND JUDITH M. COPELAND, vs. Plaintiffs, LEON PANETTA, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants. Case No. :0-CV-0-LAB (WMC) MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS CONSOLIDATED BRIEF ADDRESSING THE APPROPRIATE REMEDY TO BE IMPOSED IN THIS MATTER RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
2 0 0 Plaintiffs ask this Court to order the demolition of a memorial cross that has stood for over 0 years in silent tribute to the patriotism and sacrifice of our Nation s veterans. Although plaintiffs now argue that drastic remedy is virtually compelled by the Ninth Circuit s decision holding that the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial, as presently configured and as a whole, violates the Establishment Clause, Trunk v. City of San Diego, F.d 0, (th Cir. 0), plaintiffs took quite a different tack when opposing Supreme Court review of that decision insisting instead that it did not dictate a specific remedy, instead leaving that to [this Court] to determine in the first instance. Br. Opp. Cert.. Indeed, the Ninth Circuit s opinion expressly contemplates that the Memorial could be modified to pass constitutional muster and that a cross could be part of the Memorial. Trunk, F.d at. Accordingly, the position of the Mount Soledad Memorial Association is that subsequent, substantial enhancements of the Memorial including the addition of over 000 new plaques, and nearly double the number of granite memorial walls to make space for 00 more plaques remove any possible doubt that the Memorial passes constitutional muster. The Association therefore respectfully requests that the Court decline to impose plaintiffs drastic (and destructive) remedy, which would exhibit a hostility toward religion that has no place in our Establishment Clause traditions. Van Orden v. Perry, U.S., 0 (00) (Breyer, J., concurring). Instead, the Association respectfully requests that the Court issue an order declaring that the Memorial, as presently configured and as a whole, passes constitutional muster. BACKGROUND As the Court knows, the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial including the memorial cross has stood in San Diego for over [0] years as a tribute to the members of the United States Armed Forces who sacrificed their lives in the RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
3 0 0 defense of the United States. Pub. L. No. 0-, 0 Stat. 0, () (00). In 00, Congress designated the Memorial as a national memorial honoring veterans of the United States Armed Forces. Pub. L. No. 0-, Stat. 0, (a) (00). Then in 00, when a court order threatened to force the removal of the memorial cross, the federal government acquired the Memorial to preserve a historically significant war memorial honoring veterans of the United States Armed Forces. Pub. L. No. 0-, (a). Congress expressly found that the memorial cross is fully integrated as the centerpiece of the multi-faceted Memorial that is replete with secular symbols. Id. (). Congress also found that the patriotic and inspirational symbolism [at] the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial provides solace to the families and comrades of the veterans it memorializes. Id. (). When the Ninth Circuit held the Memorial unconstitutional in 00, the memorial cross was circled by six large granite walls featuring over 000 plaques honoring veterans, platoons, and groups of soldiers. Trunk, F.d at 0. Today, more than 00 plaques adorn the original granite walls, and five more walls which can hold an additional 00 plaques have been added to the Memorial. Brick paving stones commemorate non-veterans and supporters of veterans and the Memorial. Trunk, F.d at 0. Twenty-three bollards honor veterans and other community organizations. Id. More than a dozen benches each marked with a plaque dedicated to the memory of a loved one occupy the Soledad Natural Park grounds where the Memorial is located. The benches face the panorama, not the memorial cross. A large American flag flies atop a 0-foot flagpole a foot higher than the memorial cross itself. Id. The Memorial stood for years without legal challenge or community dissension until one of the original plaintiffs in this case sought to enjoin the City of RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
4 0 0 San Diego from displaying the memorial cross. Id. The district court granted the injunction, concluding that the display violated the California Constitution. Id. In 00, the district court ordered the City to comply with the injunction and the Ninth Circuit denied a stay pending appeal. Id. at 0. The City petitioned Justice Kennedy, as Circuit Justice, to grant the stay, which he did. San Diegans for the Mt. Soledad Nat l War Mem l v. Paulson, U.S. 0, 0 (00) (Kennedy, Cir. J.). Soon after, three members of the House of Representatives introduced a bill to acquire the Memorial. Trunk, F.d at 0. After Congress acquired the Memorial, plaintiffs filed this lawsuit. Id. at 0. On summary judgment, this Court held there was no Establishment Clause violation. The Ninth Circuit reversed, but remanded the case to this Court to fashion an appropriate remedy, and specifically noted that its decision d[id] not mean that the Memorial could not be modified to pass constitutional muster [or] that no cross can be part of [the Memorial]. Id. at. Although the Supreme Court denied certiorari, Justice Alito issued a rare statement respecting the denial, noting that the constitutionality of the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial is a question of substantial importance. Mount Soledad Mem l Ass n v. Trunk, S. Ct., (0). Justice Alito explained that in Salazar v. Buono, 0 S. Ct. 0 (00), the Court emphasized that the goal of avoiding governmental endorsement of religion does not require eradication of all religious symbols in the public realm and that [t]he demolition of the cross at issue in [Buono] would have been interpreted by some as an arresting symbol of a Government that is not neutral but hostile on matters of religion and is bent on eliminating from all public places and symbols any trace of our country s religious heritage. Id. at (citations and alterations omitted). RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
5 0 0 Justice Alito concluded by noting that [o]ur denial [of certiorari]... does not amount to a ruling on the merits, and that the Ninth Circuit s underlying judgment on liability still may be challenged in a later petition following entry of a final judgment. Id. (citations omitted). ARGUMENT Nearly three years ago, the Ninth Circuit held that the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial, presently configured and as a whole, primarily conveys a message of government endorsement of religion that violates the Establishment Clause. Trunk, F.d at (emphasis added). As Justice Alito has explained, the Ninth Circuit emphasized that its decision d[id] not mean that the Memorial could not be modified to pass constitutional muster [or] that no cross can be part of [the Memorial]. Mount Soledad, S. Ct. at (quoting Trunk, F. d at ) (alterations in original). Nonetheless, plaintiffs now insist that [t]he only remedy in this case that would be consistent with the Ninth Circuit s opinion is to order the removal of the [c]ross from its current position at the center of the Memorial atop Mount Soledad. Br. (emphasis added). That is a different view than the one plaintiffs espoused in successfully opposing Supreme Court review, when they asserted that the Ninth Circuit s opinion did not dictate a specific remedy, instead leaving that to [this Court] to determine in the first instance. Br. Opp. Cert. It is a different view than the one expressed by Justice Alito in agreeing with the Supreme Court s decision to deny certiorari. Mount Soledad, S. Ct. at ( Because no final judgment has been rendered and it remains unclear precisely what action the Federal Government will be required to take, I agree with the Court s decision to deny the petitions for certiorari. (emphasis added)). And it is a different view than the one articulated by the Ninth Circuit itself, which averred that its opinion does not mean that the Memorial could not be modified to pass constitutional muster nor does it RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
6 0 0 mean that no cross can be part of this veterans memorial. Trunk, F.d at. Taking the Ninth Circuit at its word, this Court is not foreclosed from concluding that as it stands today, the Memorial is not the same Memorial that the Ninth Circuit held, as presently constituted and as a whole, id. (emphasis added), violates the Establishment Clause. The Association, by adding numerous significant and substantial indisputably secular elements to the Memorial since then, has modified the Memorial such that no additional remedy is necessary for it to pass constitutional muster. See, e.g., ACLU v. Schundler, F.d, 0 (d Cir. ) (Alito, then-j.) (holding modified display constitutional after city added secular elements and signs to original display held to violate the Establishment Clause). Plaintiffs request (at ) for an order requiring the immediate removal of the memorial cross should therefore be denied. Although at times plaintiffs nonchalantly refer to moving the memorial cross, let us be clear: what they are proposing is the permanent and drastic alteration of a longstanding and cherished war memorial that for over [0] years, Congress found, has been a tribute to members of the United States Armed Forces who sacrificed their lives in the defense of the United States. Pub. L. No. 0-, (). Given the age, size, weight, and design of the memorial cross, any removal scenario would necessarily require it to be cut into pieces and then (if possible) reassembled. Plaintiffs glibly assert that ordering the removal of the memorial cross would not require the destruction of the [c]ross and note that 0 years ago, during a previous challenge to the display of the [memorial] [c]ross on city property, the [Association] agreed to a settlement that would move the [c]ross to a nearby church. Br.. Plaintiffs neglect to mention that at the time, the Ninth Circuit had ordered that the memorial cross must be removed (for violating RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
7 0 0 California s No Preference Clause), Trunk, F.d 0, and the Association reluctantly agreed to try to move the cross rather than see its certain destruction. That hardly qualifies as proof that removing the cross would not destroy it. And it certainly does not mean that removing the cross is the only possible remedy under the Ninth Circuit s opinion. Indeed, plaintiffs acknowledge, as they must, that the Ninth Circuit s opinion expressly contemplates that the Memorial could be modified to pass constitutional muster. Trunk, F.d at. The Association s position is that to the extent there is any constitutional violation to cure, the Association s subsequent efforts to enhance and expand the Memorial have done just that. In the five years since this Court deemed the summary judgment motions submitted (and thereby established the record reviewed by the Ninth Circuit), the Association has nearly doubled the number of memorial walls and added more than 000 new plaques that surround the memorial cross. Plaintiffs contend (at ) that those significant modifications are unavailing given the appearance, location, and history of the memorial cross. But under that interpretation of the Ninth Circuit s opinion, there is nothing the Association could do short of removing the cross to bring the Memorial up to constitutional code. Plaintiffs do not explain why, if that is so, the Ninth Circuit did not simply order the memorial cross removed rather than suggesting that the Memorial could be modified to pass constitutional muster. The Association s position is that here, as in Van Orden, the physical features of the Memorial confirm that the memorial cross is being used as a veterans memorial and not as a reaffirmation of Christian beliefs. To reiterate, the Memorial currently has more than 00 plaques on eleven memorial walls with space for another 00 plaques. Again, that is nearly double the number of walls and more than a thousand new plaques since the Ninth Circuit reviewed the record RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
8 0 0 in this case. Together with the other secular symbols of patriotism and sacrifice that make up the Memorial the brick paving stones, the bollards, the benches, and the large American flag that flies atop a flagpole a foot higher than the memorial cross itself the memorial walls and plaques contribute to a physical setting underscoring that the predominant effect of the Memorial is to convey a secular message of patriotism and sacrifice not to endorse religion. See Van Orden, U.S. at 0 (Breyer, J., concurring). What is more, the Memorial has hosted more than 00 ceremonies since April 00 none of which have been sectarian or religious including ceremonies for United States Presidents, Medal of Honor recipients, newly commissioned officers, and changes of command. This subsequent history confirms, too, that the Memorial, including the memorial cross, passes constitutional muster because at the very least, as the Memorial stands today it does not send a message of religious endorsement, but of patriotism, sacrifice, and remembrance. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court should reject plaintiffs proposed remedy of removing the memorial cross. Instead, the Court should issue an order that the Memorial as it now stands passes constitutional muster. Alternatively, if the Court orders removal, it should stay that order pending further review. Since April, 00, when the motions for summary judgment were deemed submitted (Dkt. No. ), the Association has added 0 plaques to the Memorial. The vast majority of the new plaques contain military symbols such as unit designations, airborne qualification badges, and combat infantry badges. Included in that number are new plaques that honor military units and sponsored by corporations (including cable network HBO). Of the 0 new plaques, only include religious symbols Stars of David, Buddhist symbol, Native American symbols, and Latin crosses. Exhibit A attached hereto contains true and correct photographs that accurately and fairly depict the Memorial, events at the Memorial, and selected plaques and benches, all of which comprise or surround the Memorial. So that the Court may fully appreciate the physical features and setting of the Memorial, the Association respectfully suggests that the Court (along with the Parties) visit the site. RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
9 0 0 Dated: August, 0 Respectfully submitted, BY: /s/ Charles V. Berwanger Charles V. Berwanger Allyson N. Ho* Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Main Street, Suite 00 Dallas, Texas 0 () -0 () -00 (fax) aho@morganlewis.com Jeffrey Carl Mateer* Hiram Stanley Sasser, III* Liberty Institute 00 W Plano Parkway, Suite 00 Plano, Texas 0 () - () - (fax) jmateer@libertyinstitute.org hsasser@libertyinstitute.org Brian M. Hom Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 00 S. Grand Ave., Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 () -00 () -0 (fax) bhom@morganlewis.com *Admitted pro hac vice Attorneys for MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant and Real Party in Interest RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
10 0 0 EXHIBIT A 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
11 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
12 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
13 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
14 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
15 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
16 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
17 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
18 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
19 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
20 0 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
21 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
22 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
23 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
24 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
25 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
26 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
27 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
28 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
29 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
30 0 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
31 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
32 0 0 RESPONSE BRIEF Case No.: 0-CV-0-LAB (WMc)
33
In The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 13- ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- MT. SOLEDAD MEMORIAL
More informationIn The MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL., STEVE TRUNK, ET AL.,
11-998 In The MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL., v. STEVE TRUNK, ET AL., Petitioners, Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
More informationDecember 1, Project Leader Derek Milner Tally Lake Ranger District 650 Wolfpack Way Kalispell, MT 59901
Project Leader Derek Milner Tally Lake Ranger District 650 Wolfpack Way Kalispell, MT 59901 RE: Comments of the American Center for Law & Justice and over 70,000 concerned individuals on the Reauthorization
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
NO. 10-1297 In the Supreme Court of the United States LANCE DAVENPORT, et al., Petitioners, v. AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INC., et al., Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 532 U. S. (2001) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CITY OF ELKHART v. WILLIAM A. BOOKS ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
More informationCase 9:12-cv DLC Document 68 Filed 01/25/13 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Case 9:12-cv-00019-DLC Document 68 Filed 01/25/13 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., A Wisconsin Non-Profit Corporation
More informationCase 4:16-cv SMR-CFB Document 27 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00403-SMR-CFB Document 27 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Fort Des Moines Church of Christ, Plaintiff, v. Angela
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO SAM DOE 1, SAM DOE 2, (A MINOR BY AND THROUGH HER PARENT AND NEXT FRIEND,) AND SAM DOE 3, C/O ACLU OF OHIO 4506 CHESTER AVENUE CLEVELAND, OHIO
More informationFreedom from Religion Foundation v. Weber: Big Mountain Jesus and the Constitution
Montana Law Review Online Volume 76 Article 12 7-14-2018 Freedom from Religion Foundation v. Weber: Big Mountain Jesus and the Constitution Constance Van Kley Alexander Blewett III School of Law Follow
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00849 Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION U.S. Pastor Council, Plaintiff, v. City of Austin; Steve Adler, in
More informationACLJ. American Center. for Law &Justice * Jay Alan Sekulow, J.D" Ph.D. Chief Counsel
September 5, 2013 ACLJ American Center for Law &Justice * Jay Alan Sekulow, J.D" Ph.D. Chief Counsel Mr. Dan-en 1. Elkind, DeLand City Attorney Re: Constitutionality ojdeland's City Seal Dear City Attorney
More informationNYCLU testimony on NYC Council Resolution 1155 (2011)] Testimony of Donna Lieberman. regarding
125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 212.607.3300 212.607.3318 www.nyclu.org NYCLU testimony on NYC Council Resolution 1155 (2011)] Testimony of Donna Lieberman regarding New York City Council Resolution
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 08-56415 01/04/2011 Page: 1 of 50 ID: 7598630 DktEntry: 111-1 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVE TRUNK, and Plaintiff, JEWISH WAR VETERANS OF THE No. 08-56415
More informationBefore the City Council of San Diego Regular Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 23, 2006
Jay Alan Sekulow, J.D., Ph.D. Chief Counsel Before the City Council of San Diego Regular Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 23, 2006 AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF A
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 10-1276 In the Supreme Court of the United States UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INC., ET AL, Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States
More informationNos and THE AMERICAN LEGION, et al., Petitioners, v. AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, et al., Respondents.
Nos. 17-1717 and 18-18 In The Supreme Court of the United States -------------------------- --------------------------- THE AMERICAN LEGION, et al., Petitioners, v. AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, et al.,
More informationIn The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit
Appeal: 15-1591 Doc: 50 Filed: 10/14/2015 Pg: 1 of 23 No. 15-1591 In The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit NANCY LUND; LIESA MONTAG-SIEGAL; ROBERT VOELKER, Plaintiff - Appellee, v.
More informationEMPLOYEE RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION AT WORK
EMPLOYEE RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION AT WORK PRESENTED BY: MARK GOULET & MELANIE CHARLESTON 2 Let s Organize This Talk.. Context matters: Applicable Laws Limitations on Employee Religious Expression Real Life
More informationPlaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Case: 08-56436 03/24/2009 Page: 1 of 28 DktEntry: 6857685 APPEAL NOS. 08-56415 & 08-56436 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEWISH WAR VETERANS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationJune 11, June 11, I would appreciate your prompt consideration of this opinion request.
Scott D. English, Chief of Staff Office of the Governor Post Office Box 12267 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 Dear : You request an opinion regarding the constitutionality of H.3159, R-370 which is, as
More informationFlorida Constitution Revision Commission The Capitol 400 S. Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL Re: Vote No on Proposals Amending Art.
November 17, 2017 DELIVERED VIA EMAIL Florida Constitution Revision Commission The Capitol 400 S. Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 Re: Vote No on Proposals Amending Art. 1, Section 3 Dear Chair Carlton
More information6:13-cv GRA Date Filed 09/11/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 25. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville Division
6:13-cv-02471-GRA Date Filed 09/11/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville Division American Humanist Association, CA No. John Doe and Jane Doe,
More informationSC COSA Fall Legal Summit August 26, 2016 Thomas K. Barlow, Esq. Childs & Halligan, P.A.
Overview and Analysis of the Pending American Humanist Association vs. Greenville County School District Case and Current State of the Law on Student- Initiated Religious Speech and School Use of Religious
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division DOE 1, by Doe 1 s next friend and parent, DOE 2, who also sues on Doe 2 s own behalf, v. Plaintiffs, SCHOOL BOARD OF GILES
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) )
Scott M. Kendall, SBN Law Offices of Scott M. Kendall 01 E Stockton Blvd Suite 0 Elk Grove, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF
More informationRHODE ISLAND S ATTEMPT TO LEGISLATE AROUND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
RHODE ISLAND S ATTEMPT TO LEGISLATE AROUND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE Maureen Ingersoll 1 I. INTRODUCTION The members of our military make many sacrifices for our freedom. They face many hardships during
More informationELON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BILLINGS, EXUM & FRYE NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION SPRING 2011 PROBLEM
ELON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BILLINGS, EXUM & FRYE NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION SPRING 2011 PROBLEM No. 11-217 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES, INC., Petitioner,
More informationSUPREME COURT SPLIT ON PUBLIC DISPLAY OF TEN COMMANDMENTS
SUPREME COURT SPLIT ON PUBLIC DISPLAY OF TEN COMMANDMENTS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2005 James C. Kozlowski On June 27, 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States decided two cases involving a
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 14-354 In The Supreme Court of the United States BRONX HOUSEHOLD OF FAITH, ET AL., v. Petitioners, THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO KATHRYN CHRISTIAN, JILL HAVENS, JEFF BASINGER, CLARE BOULANGER, SARAH SWEDBERG, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF COLORADO,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ELMBROOK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JOHN DOE 3, A MINOR BY DOE 3 S NEXT BEST FRIEND DOE 2, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
02-1624 In The Supreme Court of the United States ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and DAVID W. GORDON, SUPERINTENDENT, EGUSD, Petitioners, v. MICHAEL A. NEWDOW, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA v. NANCY LUND, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17 565. Decided
More informationUSA v. Glenn Flemming
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-22-2013 USA v. Glenn Flemming Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 12-1118 Follow this and additional
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. SEAN SHIELDS; and ASHLEE SHIELDS, by and through her father and next friend, SEAN SHIELDS, v. Plaintiffs, KIOWA COUNTY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION AT THE CROSS FELLOWSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH INC ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) CITY OF MONROE, NORTH CAROLINA,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
REL: 04/17/2009 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
Nos. 09-987, 09-991 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States ARIZONA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUITION ORGANIZATION, v. Petitioner, KATHLEEN M.
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
Nos. 17-1717, 18-18 In the Supreme Court of the United States THE AMERICAN LEGION, ET AL., Petitioners, v. AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, ET AL., Respondents. MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA No.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. NANCY LUND, LIESA MONTAG-SIEGEL, ) and ROBERT VOELKER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR ) DECLARATORY AND v. )
More informationId. at The Court concluded by stating that
involving the freedoms of speech and religion. 1 This letter is sent on behalf of over 14,000 individuals who signed an ACLJ petition in support of this letter within the past 24 hours, including almost
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2004 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes
More informationCase 6:15-cv JA-DCI Document 97 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4760
Case 6:15-cv-01098-JA-DCI Document 97 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4760 DAVID WILLIAMSON, et al.,, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION Plaintiffs,
More informationIgnoring Purpose, Context, and History: The Tenth Circuit Court in American Atheists, Inc. v. Duncan
BYU Law Review Volume 2011 Issue 1 Article 10 3-1-2011 Ignoring Purpose, Context, and History: The Tenth Circuit Court in American Atheists, Inc. v. Duncan Steven Michael Lau Follow this and additional
More informationNos and UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INC., et al., Respondents.
Nos. 10-1276 and 10-1297,upreme q eurt ef UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INC., et al., Respondents. LANCE DAVENPORT, JOHN NJORD, and F. KEITH STEPHAN, V. Petitioners,
More informationReligious Freedom & The Roberts Court
Religious Freedom & The Roberts Court Hannah C. Smith Senior Counsel, The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty J. Reuben Clark Law Society Annual Conference University of San Diego February 12, 2016 Religious
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 530 U. S. (2000) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TANGIPAHOA PARISH BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. v. HERB FREILER ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:04CV-338-H ELECTRONICALLY FILED
Case 3:04-cv-00338-JGH Document 146-1 Filed 04/01/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:04CV-338-H ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAMES H. O BRYAN,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 513-cv-00989-SVW-OP Document 85 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #1092 Present The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Paul M. Cruz Deputy Clerk Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs N/A
More informationFebruary 3, Lori Simon Executive Director of Academics. RE: Unconstitutional Fieldtrip to Calvary Lutheran Church
February 3, 2014 VIA EMAIL Kim Hiel Principal School of Engineering and Arts Golden Valley, MN kim_hiel@rdale.org Lori Simon Executive Director of Academics Robbinsdale Area Schools New Hope, MN lori_simon@rdale.org
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:16-cv-02912 Document #: 35 Filed: 04/18/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:499 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COLIN COLLETTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) 16 C 2912 v. )
More informationNO In The Supreme Court of the United States. KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Petitioners, FRANK BUONO,
NO. 08-472 In The Supreme Court of the United States KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Petitioners, v. FRANK BUONO, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationPRAYER AND THE MEANING OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: A DEBATE ON TOWN OF GREECE V. GALLOWAY
PRAYER AND THE MEANING OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: A DEBATE ON TOWN OF GREECE V. GALLOWAY Patrick M. Garry* I. Introduction... 1 II. The Short Answer: Marsh Supports the Prayer Practice... 2 III. The
More informationThe Pledge of Allegiance: "Under God" - Unconstitutional?
ESSAI Volume 1 Article 16 Spring 2003 The Pledge of Allegiance: "Under God" - Unconstitutional? Susanne K. Frens College of DuPage Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai Recommended
More informationCase 8:16-cv CEH-AAS Document 8 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID 210
Case 8:16-cv-02753-CEH-AAS Document 8 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID 210 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ) CAMBRIDGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, INC. ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationGreece v. Galloway: Why We Should Care About Legislative Prayer
Greece v. Galloway: Why We Should Care About Legislative Prayer Sandhya Bathija October 1, 2013 The Town of Greece, New York, located just eight miles east of Rochester, has a population close to 100,000
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION ) JOHN DOE, ) Civil Action ) Plaintiff, ) File No. ) v. ) ) Complaint for Declaratory BARROW COUNTY, GEORGIA;
More informationDISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Denver, CO 80202
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Denver, CO 80202 FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., MIKE SMITH, DAVID HABECKER, TIMOTHY G. BAILEY and JEFF BAYSINGER, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 8:13-cv JDW-TBM Document 198 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID 3859
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 198 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID 3859 MARIA DEL ROCIO BURGOS GARCIA, and LUIS A. GARCIA SAZ, UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
More informationCase 3:16-cv RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1
Case 3:16-cv-00054-RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA EVANSVILLE DIVISION KIMBALL INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationDecember 20, RE: Unconstitutional ban on employee Christmas decorations deemed religious
Post Office Box 540774 Orlando, FL 32854-0774 Telephone: 407 875 1776 Facsimile: 407 875 0770 www.lc.org 122 C St. N.W., Ste. 360 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: 202 289 1776 Facsimile: 202 216 9656 Reply
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 12-696a IN THE Supreme Court of the United States MARTIN COUNTY AND MARTIN COUNTY BOARD, Petitioners, v. ANNE DHALIWAL, Respondent. On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: FEBRUARY 4, 2011; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2009-CA-002226-MR JOANNE SMITH APPELLANT APPEAL FROM HART CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE GEOFFREY P. MORRIS,
More information2:13-cv RMG Date Filed 08/15/17 Entry Number 83-1 Page 1 of 12
2:13-cv-00587-RMG Date Filed 08/15/17 Entry Number 83-1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION The Right Reverend Charles G. vonrosenberg
More informationIn Brief: Supreme Court Revisits Legislative Prayer in Town of Greece v. Galloway
NOV. 4, 2013 In Brief: Supreme Court Revisits Legislative Prayer in Town of Greece v. Galloway FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Lugo, Director, Religion & Public Life Project Alan Cooperman, Deputy
More informationCase 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8
Case 112-cv-08170-RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- X U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,
More informationThe Coalition Against Religious Discrimination
The Coalition Against Religious Discrimination November 24, 2017 Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships Office of Intergovernmental and External Affairs U.S. Department of Health and Human
More informationCase: Document: 122 Page: 1 11/22/ CV IN THE. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Case: 13-1668 Document: 122 Page: 1 11/22/2013 1100000 18 13-1668-CV IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT American Atheists, Inc., Dennis Horvitz, Kenneth Bronstein, Jane Everhart
More informationSUPREME COURT SECOND DIVISION
SUPREME COURT SECOND DIVISION DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER AND COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, Petitioner, -versus- G.R. No. 102084 August 12, 1998 HON. BIENVENIDO E. LAGUESMA, Undersecretary of Labor and
More informationMEMORANDUM. Teacher/Administrator Rights & Responsibilities
MEMORANDUM These issue summaries provide an overview of the law as of the date they were written and are for educational purposes only. These summaries may become outdated and may not represent the current
More informationConscientious Objectors--Religious Training and Belief--New Test [Umted States v'. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965) ]
Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 17 Issue 3 1966 Conscientious Objectors--Religious Training and Belief--New Test [Umted States v'. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965) ] Jerrold L. Goldstein Follow this
More informationCase 8:19-cv Document 1 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID 1
Case 8:19-cv-00725 Document 1 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ENGLEWOOD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, INC. dba CROSSPOINT
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD In the Matter of PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY, Employer, v. SEIU LOCAL 925, Petitioner. Case No. 19-RC-102521 AMICUS BRIEF OF THE BECKET FUND FOR
More informationAffirmed by published opinion. Associate Justice O Connor wrote the opinion, in which Judge Motz and Judge Shedd joined.
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1944 HASHMEL C. TURNER, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA; THOMAS J. TOMZAK, in
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY, ALABAMA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY, ALABAMA BOARD OF DEACONS OF THE SHILOH MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHILOH MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH CV: Plaintiffs vs. JUAN D. MCFARLAND,
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT C/W SAFEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY OF LOUISIANA, ET AL. ************
DAVID CHAPMAN, ET AL. VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 06-0529 C/W 06-0530 SAFEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY OF LOUISIANA, ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationCase: Document: 20 Filed: 04/09/2014 Pages: 18. No FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., ANNIE LAURIE GAYLOR, and DAN BARKER,
No. 14 1152 FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., ANNIE LAURIE GAYLOR, and DAN BARKER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JACOB J. LEW, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, and JOHN A. KOSKINEN,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 1999 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed February 15, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D11-1526 Lower Tribunal
More informationCase Doc 279 Filed 07/07/15 Entered 07/07/15 16:21:45 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Document Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: The Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Debtor. Case No. 15-30125 Chapter 11 RESPONSE OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAINT
More information[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #17-7171 Document #1713118 Filed: 01/16/2018 Page 1 of 20 [ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] No. 17-7171 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT August 18, 2010
Extensively abridged by the instructor with unmarked abridgements and format changes Photographs of crosses appear at end of document. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT August 18, 2010 AMERICAN
More informationShould We Take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance?
Should We Take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance? An atheist father of a primary school student challenged the Pledge of Allegiance because it included the words under God. Michael A. Newdow, who has
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COMPLAINT. I. Preliminary Statement
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JAMES W. GREEN, an individual, and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Case No.:
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 15-577 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH OF COLUMBIA, INC., Petitioner, v. SARA PARKER PAULEY, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari To The United
More informationNo In The Supreme Court of the United States. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
No. 02-1624 In The Supreme Court of the United States ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, and DAVID W. GORDON, Superintendent, v. Petitioners, MICHAEL A. NEWDOW, et al., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari
More informationOctober 3, Humble Independent School District Eastway Village Drive Humble, TX 77338
October 3, 2016 Dr. Elizabeth Fagen Superintendent Humble Independent School District 20200 Eastway Village Drive Humble, TX 77338 April Maldonado Principal Eagle Springs Elementary School 12500 Will Clayton
More information: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT. Doe 2 s next friend and parent, Doe 3; and Doe 3, Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., DOE 1, by DOE 1 s next friend and parent, MARIE SCHAUB, who also sues on her own behalf,
More informationPraying for Clarity: Lund, Bormuth, and the Split Over Legislator-Led Prayer
Boston College Law Review Volume 59 Issue 9 Electronic Supplement Article 6 3-19-2018 Praying for Clarity: Lund, Bormuth, and the Split Over Legislator-Led Prayer John Gavin Boston College Law School,
More informationCase 1:03-cv WDQ Document 93 Filed 06/21/2005 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:03-cv-01865-WDQ Document 93 Filed 06/21/2005 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, NORTHERN DIVISION ROY J. CHAMBERS, * Plaintiff, * v. * CIVIL NO.: WDQ-03-1865
More informationJULY 2004 LAW REVIEW RELIGIOUS MESSAGE EXCLUDED FROM CHRISTMAS DISPLAYS IN PARK. James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C.
RELIGIOUS MESSAGE EXCLUDED FROM CHRISTMAS DISPLAYS IN PARK James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2004 James C. Kozlowski In the case of Calvary Chapel Church, Inc. v. Broward County, 299 F.Supp.2d 1295 (So.Dist
More informationFirst Amendment Issues (You Might Get Wrong) Steve Williams Bobby Truhe KSB School Law (402)
First Amendment Issues (You Might Get Wrong) Steve Williams Bobby Truhe KSB School Law (402) 804-8000 steve@ksbschoollaw.com bobby@ksbschoollaw.com KSB School Law @SteveIsEsteban @btruhe Taking a stand
More informationCase: 1:11-cv DCN Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/03/11 1 of 12. PageID #: 13
Case: 1:11-cv-02374-DCN Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/03/11 1 of 12. PageID #: 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM T. PHELPS, 464 Chestnut Drive Berea,
More informationJune 13, RE: Unconstitutional Censorship of Moriah Bridges. Dr. Rowe and School Board:
June 13, 2017 Dr. Carrie Rowe, Superintendent Mr. Frank Bovalino, Board President Dr. Mark Deitrick, Board Vice-President Ms. Deborah Hogue, Secretary Mr. Robert Bickerton, Member Ms. Wende Dikec, Member
More informationIn The United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit
Case: 15-1869 Document: 66 Filed: 04/27/2017 Page: 1 No. 15-1869 In The United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit PETER CARL BORMUTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COUNTY OF JACKSON, Defendant -
More informationCase 2:11-cv GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:11-cv-05827-GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WEBMD HEALTH CORP. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 11-5827 ) ANTHONY
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT MOUNT ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-0961 MOUNT ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH VERSUS AMEAL JONES, SR. ********** APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 240,167
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
Case 3:16-cv-00195-MCR-CJK Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION AMANDA KONDRAT YEV, ANDREIY KONDRAT YEV, ANDRE
More informationNo SPARTANBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT SEVEN, a South Carolina body politic and corporate
No. 11-1448 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ROBERT MOSS, individually and as general guardian of his minor child; ELLEN TILLETT, individually and as general guardian of her
More information