A s a contracts professional, from

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "A s a contracts professional, from"

Transcription

1 18 Contract Management June 2015

2 Contract Management June

3 A s a contracts professional, from time to time you must answer a question, resolve an issue, explain something, or make a decision based on language in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) or in a contract. On those occasions, you may have to document the basis for your answer, resolution, explanation, or decision so as to prove that it was consistent with the terms of the FAR or the contract and that it was reasonable. In other words, you will have to make an argument for the record. On other occasions, perhaps in a negotiation or a meeting to resolve a potential dispute, someone might offer an argument to you in support of some proposition, and you will have to assess the soundness of his or her thinking on the matter. the major and minor premises; said to follow from them (e.g., Therefore, Socrates is mortal ). The syllogism was developed by the Greek philosopher Aristotle and described in his work, Prior Analytics, which he wrote circa 350 B.C.E. That work is one of six of his treatises on logic that are collectively known as the Organon, which means tool in classical Greek. 1 Although logic has progressed considerably since Aristotle, the syllogism remains an essential tool of sound thinking. 2 Surprisingly, it seems that most persons have not received formal education in syllogistic argument and do not routinely use it in their work. That is ironic in the case of acquisition, because the syllogism provides the underlying structure for the determinations and findings (D&F) required by the FAR: Determinations and Findings (D&F) means a special form of written approval by an authorized official that is required by statute or regulation as a prerequisite to taking certain actions. The determination is a conclusion or decision supported by the findings. The findings are statements of fact or rationale essential to support the determination and must cover each requirement of the statute or regulation. 3 By argument, I mean a rational discussion in which people try to persuade one another. There are many ways to persuade, and there is often more to it than logic, but logic is the foundation of sound argument, and one of the most powerful tools of logic is the syllogism. What is a syllogism? As used in this article, a syllogism is a deductive argument comprised of an ordered set of three related propositions, each centered around a premise (which is a declarative sentence that asserts something about something): A major premise A general rule, principle, or fact (e.g., All men are mortal ). A minor premise A specific fact (e.g., Socrates is a man ). A conclusion The logical consequence of the relationship between 20 Contract Management June 2015

4 The findings in a D&F are premises; the determination is a conclusion. AN EXAMPLE OF A SYLLOGISTIC ARGUMENT Suppose that a contracting officer has issued a change order under a construction contract. The contractor thinks that the change order is not valid and that he or she does not need to comply. The contracting officer asks the contractor to explain its reasoning. The contractor replies with three statements, as follows: Under the changes clause in our contract, you can issue a change order only to make changes that are within the general scope of this contract. The change order that you ve issued requires us to do work that is outside of the general scope of the contract. The contract is for a small animal shelter. You want to change it to an apartment building, which would be much larger, much more complex, require more specialty labor and more equipment, take much longer to complete, and cost much more. Therefore, you cannot issue the change order. The contractor has made a syllogistic argument. The major premise is the rule in the contract clause under which the issue must be resolved. The minor premise is the pertinent facts that relate to the rule, and is accompanied by explanatory assertions. The conclusion is the proposed resolution of the issue: You cannot issue the change order. Is the conclusion true? THE CONCEPTS OF VALIDITY AND TRUTH There are two important concepts in a syllogistic argument: 1) validity and 2) truth. Arguments may be valid or invalid. It is a rule of syllogistic reasoning that an argument is valid when the conclusion follows from the premises that is, when the conclusion would be undeniable if the premises were true. Premises may be true or false. Another rule of a syllogistic argument is that a conclusion is true if it is based on a valid argument and if the premises of the argument are true. An argument can be valid, but its conclusion false, if one of the premises of the argument is false. 4 Consider the following syllogistic argument: Major premise All small animals are birds. Minor premise The animal in the backyard is small. Conclusion Therefore, the animal in the backyard is a bird. That argument is valid, because if the premises were true, then the conclusion would also be true. However, the major premise is false (not all small animals are birds), so the conclusion is also false based on the terms of the argument. It might be true on other grounds, such as if the animal in the backyard was, in fact, a bird. But you would not persuade any thinking person of the truth of that conclusion based on the premise that, All small animals are birds. Think back to the change order example previously mentioned. With respect to the contractor s major premise, it is undeniably true that the changes clause lets the contracting officer order changes only if they are within the general scope of the contract. 5 So, a change outside the general scope of the contract would not be authorized under the clause. It would be a cardinal change, which would be a breach of contract. The contractor s argument is valid. But is it true? The truth of the contractor s conclusion depends on the truth of the contractor s minor premise, which is that the change is outside the general scope. That has not been proven. General scope of the contract is a term of art and a very complex idea that is based on case law. 6 More information and Contract Management June

5 analysis is needed in order to determine whether the change is, in fact, outside the general scope of the contract. The contractor will have to make an argument about that. The major premise of that argument would be a statement of the case law rule about what constitutes an out-of-scope change. The minor premise would be a description of the characteristics of the change that the contracting officer wants Surprisingly, it seems that most persons have not received formal education in syllogistic argument and do not routinely use it in their work. to make. The conclusion would depend on the application of the major premise to the minor premise. ANOTHER EXAMPLE Now, suppose that you work for a company that does not have much experience with U.S. federal government contracts. The company has decided to sell its services to the Department of Defense and is about to embark on the negotiation of a contract. The sales team has met with the government s contracting officer, who told them that the company will have to submit certified cost or pricing data with their proposal, update it during negotiations, and, after agreement on price, certify that the data they submitted were accurate, complete, and current as of the date of the agreement. Since they were new to government contracting, the sales team asked the contracting officer to explain. The contracting officer told them to read the rules in FAR and The idea is entirely new to them and they are shocked. The sales team comes to you and asks you to explain this certified cost or pricing data business. How do you explain something like this to people who are not familiar with government contracting rules and procedures? The answer is that you: Make a syllogistic argument based on the rules in the FAR and the facts, Show the team that your premises are true, and Show them that the conclusion is unavoidable. Refusing to submit certified cost and pricing data would likely kill the deal. In contracting, when arguing syllogistically based on a rule in the FAR or a term of a contract, the major premise is a plain English statement of the applicable rule or contract term. The minor premise is a statement of the pertinent facts of the particular case. The conclusion reflects the application of the rule or contract term to the facts. Now, let s consider how to explain the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing data to the sales team. The first step in explaining is to do your homework. Find the rule that governs the issue. Research discloses that the rule about submitting certified cost or pricing data is in FAR , which states, in pertinent part: The contracting officer shall obtain certified cost or pricing data only if the contracting officer concludes that none of the exceptions in (b) applies. The threshold for obtaining certified cost or pricing data is $700,000. Unless an exception applies, certified cost or pricing data are required before [t]he award of any negotiated contract (except for undefinitized actions such as letter contracts). 7 That rule raises four questions regarding the facts of the matter: Do any of the exceptions in FAR (b) apply? Will the value of the contract exceed $700,000? Will the contract be a negotiated contract? Will the contract be an undefinitized action? 22 Contract Management June 2015

6 Let s take each question in turn. Do Any of the Exceptions in FAR (b) Apply? There are five exceptions in FAR (b): When prices will be based on adequate price competition, When prices are set by law or regulation, The beauty of the syllogism is that it provides a framework for critical thinking, which is self-evaluative thinking. When the contract is for a commercial item, When a waiver has been granted, and/or When the negotiation is for the modification of a contract for a commercial item. In this case, the contract will be awarded without competition. The prices will not be set by law or regulation. The contract will not be for a commercial item. The head of the contracting activity has rejected a request for a waiver. The negotiation will not be for a modification of a contract. Will the Value of the Contract Exceed $700,000? The contract is for a service. The price for the base period is expected to be about $200,000. The contract will include two options to extend the period of performance. The price of the first option is expected to be about $250,000. The price of the second option is expected to be about $300,000. The sales team argues that the option prices should not count, because it is not certain that the government will exercise any of them. They point out that the contract will be worth only about $200,000 at the time of award. However, you point out that FAR 1.108(c) states that option prices must be included when applying a dollar threshold. Thus, the contract price is expected to be $750,000, which exceeds the threshold for submission of certified cost or pricing data. Will the Contract be a Negotiated Contract? FAR (a)(1)(i) applies the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing data to any negotiated contract. The Scope section of FAR Part 15 states: A contract awarded using other than sealed bidding procedures is a negotiated contract. The prospective contract in question will be awarded using negotiated procedures, not sealed bidding procedures, so it will be a negotiated contract. Finally, Will the Contract be an Undefinitized Action, such as a Letter Contract? The FAR does not define undefinitized action. However, the contract will be with the Department of Defense, and the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) defines undefinitized contract action as follows: Undefinitized contract action means any contract action for which the contract terms, specifications, or price are not agreed upon before performance is begun under the action. Examples are letter contracts, orders under basic ordering agreements, and provisioned item orders, for which the price has not been agreed upon before performance has begun. For policy relating to definitization of change orders, see The prospective contract is not an undefinitized contract action, because the parties will agree upon contract terms before performance begins. Contract Management June

7 A well-constructed syllogism boils an argument down to its essentials and makes it easier to understand, discuss, and evaluate. which it is based are several pages long and complex. In acquisition, well-constructed arguments tend to be simple and concise. Those qualities are attained through thorough research, systematic analysis, and effective paraphrasing. We can test the argument for validity and each of the premises for truth in order to verify the truth of the conclusion: Does the conclusion follow from the premises? Would the conclusion be undeniable if the premises are true? If so, then the argument is valid. Assuming that the argument is valid, is the major premise true? Is the minor premise true? If so, then the conclusion must be true. When you put true premises to work in valid syllogistic arguments, you will be making logical deductions and will be thinking and arguing rationally. Having ascertained the pertinent facts, you might explain the situation to the team with the following argument: Major premise FAR says that the contracting officer must obtain certified cost or pricing data when: No exception applies, The contract is expected to exceed $700,000, The contract will be negotiated, and The contract will not be an undefinitized action. Minor premise The facts are: None of the exceptions apply, The contract is expected to exceed $700,000, It will be a negotiated contract, and It will not be an undefinitized action. Conclusion Therefore, the contracting officer must obtain certified cost or pricing data before awarding the contract. Note that the argument is very simple and concise, despite the fact that the rules on SYLLOGISTIC REASONING PROVIDES A FRAMEWORK FOR CRITICAL THINKING You can use syllogistic argument as the foundation for price negotiation memoranda, source selection decision documents, justifications for other than full and open competition, requests for equitable adjustment and claims, contracting officer final decisions, and many other kinds of conclusive documentation. The beauty of the syllogism is that it provides a framework for critical thinking, which is self-evaluative thinking. Critical thinking entails evaluating your thought process while engaged in it, testing your arguments for validity, and verifying that your premises are true. Syllogistic reasoning also provides a framework for effective discussion. The participants in the discussion can focus on the argument: Is it valid? They can then focus on the premises: Are they true? A 24 Contract Management June 2015

8 well-constructed syllogism boils an argument down to its essentials and makes it easier to understand, discuss, and evaluate. THE MARK OF A LEARNED PROFESSIONAL The ability to reason using syllogistic argument and to construct, use, analyze, evaluate, and critique arguments is the mark of a learned professional. It is an essential skill in the contracting profession, and contracting professionals should argue syllogistically when trying to decide, explain, and persuade. Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner, an expert in English usage and editor of Black s Law Dictionary, have written: Leaving aside emotional appeals, persuasion is possible only because all human beings are born with a capacity for logical thought. It is something we all have in common. The most rigorous form of logic, and hence the most persuasive, is the syllogism. 9 There is much more to syllogistic argument than I have covered in this article, and there is much more to argument than syllogistic argument. For a good, basic discussion of argument, see Anthony Weston, A Rulebook for Arguments, fourth ed. (2009); for more about syllogistic argument, see Robin Smith, Aristotle s Logic, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition). CM ABOUT THE AUTHOR VERNON J. EDWARDS is a former contracting official with the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Department of Energy. He is the author of books and numerous other publications on contracting, and is a monthly contributor to The Nash & Cibinic Report, which is published by Thomson Reuters. Send comments about this article to cm@ncmahq.org. ENDNOTES 1. Aristotle, The Organon: The works of Aristotle on Logic (2012), Roger Bishop Jones (ed.). 2. See William Kneale and Martha Kneale, The Development of Logic (1962). 3. FAR Copi, Cohen, and McMahon; Introduction to Logic, 14th ed. (2011): See paragraph (a) of the changes clause for construction contracts (FAR ). 6. See Nash and Feldman, Government Contract Changes, 3rd ed. (2007): 4:2 4:8. 7. FAR DFARS (d). 9. Antonin Scalia and Bryan A. Garner, Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges (2008): Section 22, Think syllogistically. This article is merely an introduction to a rich, complex, fascinating, and rewarding topic. Join BVTI at NCMA 2015 World Congress 26 JULY SUNDAY Come to Booth 515 and get a frst hand look at ValuePath - our of-the-shelf, full-life cycle acquisition software that powers the IC ARC and DHS Acquisition Forecast System (APFS) info@bvti.com 28 JULY TUESDAY 27 JULY MONDAY Visit with BVTI in Booth 515 Meet with our Acquisition and Forecast Experts Meet with our Audit, Big Data and Pricing Compliance Experts Now Hiring Acquisition and Program Management Specialists Contract Management June

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING 1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process

More information

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS Fall 2001 ENGLISH 20 Professor Tanaka CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS In this first handout, I would like to simply give you the basic outlines of our critical thinking model

More information

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals Argument and Persuasion Stating Opinions and Proposals The Method It all starts with an opinion - something that people can agree or disagree with. The Method Move to action Speak your mind Convince someone

More information

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic Standardizing and Diagramming In Reason and the Balance we have taken the approach of using a simple outline to standardize short arguments,

More information

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises Deduction Deductive arguments, deduction, deductive logic all means the same thing. They are different ways of referring to the same style of reasoning Deduction is just one mode of reasoning, but it is

More information

Writing Essays at Oxford

Writing Essays at Oxford Writing Essays at Oxford Introduction One of the best things you can take from an Oxford degree in philosophy/politics is the ability to write an essay in analytical philosophy, Oxford style. Not, obviously,

More information

CITY OF CLAWSON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PLANNING SERVICES

CITY OF CLAWSON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PLANNING SERVICES CITY OF CLAWSON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PLANNING SERVICES SUMMARY: The City of Clawson requests proposals to provide professional planning services. SUBMISSION: Please submit three (3) single-sided original,

More information

SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents

SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents UNIT 1 SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY Contents 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Research in Philosophy 1.3 Philosophical Method 1.4 Tools of Research 1.5 Choosing a Topic 1.1 INTRODUCTION Everyone who seeks knowledge

More information

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year 1 Department/Program 2012-2016 Assessment Plan Department: Philosophy Directions: For each department/program student learning outcome, the department will provide an assessment plan, giving detailed information

More information

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe. Overview Philosophy & logic 1.2 What is philosophy? 1.3 nature of philosophy Why philosophy Rules of engagement Punctuality and regularity is of the essence You should be active in class It is good to

More information

The Appeal to Reason. Introductory Logic pt. 1

The Appeal to Reason. Introductory Logic pt. 1 The Appeal to Reason Introductory Logic pt. 1 Argument vs. Argumentation The difference is important as demonstrated by these famous philosophers. The Origins of Logic: (highlights) Aristotle (385-322

More information

Criticizing Arguments

Criticizing Arguments Kareem Khalifa Criticizing Arguments 1 Criticizing Arguments Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College Written August, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Step 1: Initial Evaluation

More information

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Dear Applicant, We are pleased that you have an interest in working with us. In order for us to determine whether we should work together, you need to know something about us

More information

Instructor s Manual 1

Instructor s Manual 1 Instructor s Manual 1 PREFACE This instructor s manual will help instructors prepare to teach logic using the 14th edition of Irving M. Copi, Carl Cohen, and Kenneth McMahon s Introduction to Logic. The

More information

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference 1 2 3 4 5 6 Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference of opinion. Often heated. A statement of

More information

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion. ACADEMIC SKILLS THINKING CRITICALLY In the everyday sense of the word, critical has negative connotations. But at University, Critical Thinking is a positive process of understanding different points of

More information

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to: Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS MGT604 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After exploring this chapter, you will be able to: 1. Explain the ethical framework of utilitarianism. 2. Describe how utilitarian

More information

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 20118/19. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 20118/19. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 20118/19 Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,

More information

World Religions. These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide.

World Religions. These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide. World Religions These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide. Overview Extended essays in world religions provide

More information

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church   September 8, 2011 Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church http://www.fbcweb.org/doctrines.html September 8, 2011 Building Mental Muscle & Growing the Mind through Logic Exercises: Lesson 4a The Three Acts of the

More information

Semantic Foundations for Deductive Methods

Semantic Foundations for Deductive Methods Semantic Foundations for Deductive Methods delineating the scope of deductive reason Roger Bishop Jones Abstract. The scope of deductive reason is considered. First a connection is discussed between the

More information

SALE OF CHURCH REAL PROPERTY FOR DEVELOPMENT In the Episcopal Diocese of Long Island. Policies, Procedures and Practices

SALE OF CHURCH REAL PROPERTY FOR DEVELOPMENT In the Episcopal Diocese of Long Island. Policies, Procedures and Practices SALE OF CHURCH REAL PROPERTY FOR DEVELOPMENT In the Episcopal Diocese of Long Island Policies, Procedures and Practices There are specific procedures that must be followed in order for a parish to sell

More information

Payment Card Industry (PCI) Qualified Integrators and Resellers

Payment Card Industry (PCI) Qualified Integrators and Resellers Payment Card Industry (PCI) Qualified Integrators and Resellers Program Guide Version 1.1 November 2014 Document Changes Date Version Description August 2012 1.0 Initial release of the PCI Qualified Integrators

More information

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7 Portfolio Project Phil 251A Logic Fall 2012 Due: Friday, December 7 1 Overview The portfolio is a semester-long project that should display your logical prowess applied to real-world arguments. The arguments

More information

PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING

PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING By John Bloore Internet Encyclopdia of Philosophy, written by John Wttersten, http://www.iep.utm.edu/cr-ratio/#h7 Carl Gustav Hempel (1905 1997) Known for Deductive-Nomological

More information

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language, Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language, rhythmic patterns of speech, etc. Logical Argument Appeals

More information

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall Stetson University Chapter 8 - Sentential ruth ables and Argument orms 8.1 Introduction he truth-value of a given truth-functional compound proposition depends

More information

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC FOR PRIVATE REGISTRATION TO BA PHILOSOPHY PROGRAMME 1. Logic is the science of-----------. A) Thought B) Beauty C) Mind D) Goodness 2. Aesthetics is the science of ------------.

More information

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5 Lesson Seventeen The Conditional Syllogism Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5 It is clear then that the ostensive syllogisms are effected by means of the aforesaid figures; these considerations

More information

COMMITTEE HANDBOOK WESTERN BRANCH BAPTIST CHURCH 4710 HIGH STREET WEST PORTSMOUTH, VA 23703

COMMITTEE HANDBOOK WESTERN BRANCH BAPTIST CHURCH 4710 HIGH STREET WEST PORTSMOUTH, VA 23703 COMMITTEE HANDBOOK WESTERN BRANCH BAPTIST CHURCH 4710 HIGH STREET WEST PORTSMOUTH, VA 23703 Revised and Updated SEPTEMBER 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS General Committee Guidelines 3 Committee Chair 4 Committee

More information

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your

More information

How Will I Be Graded in This Class?

How Will I Be Graded in This Class? How Will I Be Graded in This Class? This is a fair question, and part of it is answered in the syllabus. But let me emphasize this: you will be primarily graded in this class on your understanding of the

More information

To better understand VALIDITY, we now turn to the topic of logical form.

To better understand VALIDITY, we now turn to the topic of logical form. LOGIC GUIDE 2 To better understand VALIDITY, we now turn to the topic of logical form. LOGICAL FORM The logical form of a statement or argument is the skeleton, or structure. If you retain only the words

More information

Introduction to Technical Communications 21W.732 Section 2 Ethics in Science and Technology Formal Paper #2

Introduction to Technical Communications 21W.732 Section 2 Ethics in Science and Technology Formal Paper #2 Introduction to Technical Communications 21W.732 Section 2 Ethics in Science and Technology Formal Paper #2 Since its inception in the 1970s, stem cell research has been a complicated and controversial

More information

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8 correlated to the Indiana Academic English/Language Arts Grade 8 READING READING: Fiction RL.1 8.RL.1 LEARNING OUTCOME FOR READING LITERATURE Read and

More information

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT 30-minute Argument Essay SKILLS TESTED Your ability to articulate complex ideas clearly and effectively Your ability to examine claims and accompanying evidence Your

More information

Moore on External Relations

Moore on External Relations Moore on External Relations G. J. Mattey Fall, 2005 / Philosophy 156 The Dogma of Internal Relations Moore claims that there is a dogma held by philosophers such as Bradley and Joachim, that all relations

More information

Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000)

Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000) Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000) (1) The standard sort of philosophy paper is what is called an explicative/critical paper. It consists of four parts: (i) an introduction (usually

More information

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Ethics and Morality Ethics: greek ethos, study of morality What is Morality? Morality: system of rules for guiding

More information

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker. Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 October 25 & 27, 2016 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Schedule see syllabus as well! B. Questions? II. Refutation A. Arguments are typically used to establish conclusions.

More information

Philosophy 220. Truth Functional Properties Expressed in terms of Consistency

Philosophy 220. Truth Functional Properties Expressed in terms of Consistency Philosophy 220 Truth Functional Properties Expressed in terms of Consistency The concepts of truth-functional logic: Truth-functional: Truth Falsity Indeterminacy Entailment Validity Equivalence Consistency

More information

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 March 19 & 24, 2015 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Roll B. Schedule C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know D. Discussion

More information

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS/BENCHMARKS

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS/BENCHMARKS SUBJECT: Spanish GRADE LEVEL: 9-12 COURSE TITLE: Spanish 1, Novice Low, Novice High COURSE CODE: 708340 SUBMISSION TITLE: Avancemos 2013, Level 1 BID ID: 2774 PUBLISHER: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt PUBLISHER

More information

Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones

Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy Roger Bishop Jones Started: 3rd December 2011 Last Change Date: 2011/12/04 19:50:45 http://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/www/books/ppfd/ppfdpam.pdf Id: pamtop.tex,v

More information

Critical Thinking is:

Critical Thinking is: Logic: Day 1 Critical Thinking is: Thinking clearly and following rules of logic and rationality It s not being argumentative just for the sake of arguing Academics disagree about which departments do

More information

Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones

Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy Roger Bishop Jones June 5, 2012 www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/www/books/ppfd/ppfdbook.pdf c Roger Bishop Jones; Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Metaphysical Positivism 3

More information

Please visit our website for other great titles:

Please visit our website for other great titles: First printing: July 2010 Copyright 2010 by Jason Lisle. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission of the publisher, except

More information

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT 30- minute Argument Essay SKILLS TESTED Your ability to articulate complex ideas clearly and effectively Your ability to examine claims and accompanying evidence Your

More information

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No. 2008-02 Adopted February 27, 2008 WHEREAS, the Township of Manalapan

More information

Elements of Science (cont.); Conditional Statements. Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Fall 2010 UC San Diego 9/29/2010

Elements of Science (cont.); Conditional Statements. Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Fall 2010 UC San Diego 9/29/2010 Elements of Science (cont.); Conditional Statements Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Fall 2010 UC San Diego 9/29/2010 1 Why cover statements and arguments Decision making (whether in science or elsewhere)

More information

Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly *

Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly * Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly * Ralph Wedgwood 1 Two views of practical reason Suppose that you are faced with several different options (that is, several ways in which you might act in a

More information

Truth At a World for Modal Propositions

Truth At a World for Modal Propositions Truth At a World for Modal Propositions 1 Introduction Existentialism is a thesis that concerns the ontological status of individual essences and singular propositions. Let us define an individual essence

More information

Comments on Truth at A World for Modal Propositions

Comments on Truth at A World for Modal Propositions Comments on Truth at A World for Modal Propositions Christopher Menzel Texas A&M University March 16, 2008 Since Arthur Prior first made us aware of the issue, a lot of philosophical thought has gone into

More information

What would count as Ibn Sīnā (11th century Persia) having first order logic?

What would count as Ibn Sīnā (11th century Persia) having first order logic? 1 2 What would count as Ibn Sīnā (11th century Persia) having first order logic? Wilfrid Hodges Herons Brook, Sticklepath, Okehampton March 2012 http://wilfridhodges.co.uk Ibn Sina, 980 1037 3 4 Ibn Sīnā

More information

QCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus

QCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus QCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus Considerations supporting the development of Learning Intentions, Success Criteria, Feedback & Reporting Where are Syllabus objectives taught (in

More information

Overview of Today s Lecture

Overview of Today s Lecture Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 1 Overview of Today s Lecture Music: Robin Trower, Daydream (King Biscuit Flower Hour concert, 1977) Administrative Stuff (lots of it) Course Website/Syllabus [i.e.,

More information

Argumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4

Argumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4 Argumentative Writing 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4 Unit Objectives IWBAT - Write an argumentative essay that supports claims in an analysis of a topic and uses valid reasoning,

More information

Priesthood Restoration Site Visitor Center Water Systems

Priesthood Restoration Site Visitor Center Water Systems Priesthood Restoration Site Visitor Center Water Systems Request for Proposals The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Brigham Young University Civil and Environmental Engineering Capstone Design

More information

Anthony P. Andres. The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic. Anthony P. Andres

Anthony P. Andres. The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic. Anthony P. Andres [ Loyola Book Comp., run.tex: 0 AQR Vol. W rev. 0, 17 Jun 2009 ] [The Aquinas Review Vol. W rev. 0: 1 The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic From at least the time of John of St. Thomas, scholastic

More information

CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH

CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH I. Challenges to Confirmation A. The Inductivist Turkey B. Discovery vs. Justification 1. Discovery 2. Justification C. Hume's Problem 1. Inductive

More information

Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness

Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness 1 Goals Today Introduce one of our central topics: validity and soundness, and its connection to one of our primary course goals, namely: learning how to evaluate arguments

More information

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 2017/18 Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,

More information

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens. INTRODUCTION TO LOGICAL THINKING Lecture 6: Two types of argument and their role in science: Deduction and induction 1. Deductive arguments Arguments that claim to provide logically conclusive grounds

More information

Håkan Salwén. Hume s Law: An Essay on Moral Reasoning Lorraine Besser-Jones Volume 31, Number 1, (2005) 177-180. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES Terms and

More information

BE5502 Course Syllabus

BE5502 Course Syllabus Course Number, Name, and Credit Hours BE5502 Communicating Scripture, 3 credit hours Course Description This course is designed to equip students to structure and prepare messages from biblical passages.

More information

Limited Tender Enquiry

Limited Tender Enquiry Rajgir, District: Nalanda, Bihar 803 116 Ph. No: 06112 255330 Web: www.nalandauniv.edu.in Limited Tender Enquiry No. NU/FIN/2015-16/81 Date: 5 th February 2016 To M/s Subject: Internal Auditing and Preparation

More information

The Problem of Major Premise in Buddhist Logic

The Problem of Major Premise in Buddhist Logic The Problem of Major Premise in Buddhist Logic TANG Mingjun The Institute of Philosophy Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Shanghai, P.R. China Abstract: This paper is a preliminary inquiry into the main

More information

PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT

PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT UNDERGRADUATE HANDBOOK 2013 Contents Welcome to the Philosophy Department at Flinders University... 2 PHIL1010 Mind and World... 5 PHIL1060 Critical Reasoning... 6 PHIL2608 Freedom,

More information

PHILOSOPHY-PHIL (PHIL)

PHILOSOPHY-PHIL (PHIL) Philosophy-PHIL (PHIL) 1 PHILOSOPHY-PHIL (PHIL) Courses PHIL 100 Appreciation of Philosophy (GT-AH3) Credits: 3 (3-0-0) Basic issues in philosophy including theories of knowledge, metaphysics, ethics,

More information

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims). TOPIC: You need to be able to: Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims). Organize arguments that we read into a proper argument

More information

The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle

The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle This paper is dedicated to my unforgettable friend Boris Isaevich Lamdon. The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle The essence of formal logic The aim of every science is to discover the laws

More information

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments M01_COPI1396_13_SE_C01.QXD 10/10/07 9:48 PM Page 26 26 CHAPTER 1 Basic Logical Concepts 19. All ethnic movements are two-edged swords. Beginning benignly, and sometimes necessary to repair injured collective

More information

KIRTLAND BOARD OF EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING AGENDA KIRTLAND HIGH SCHOOL CAFETERIA

KIRTLAND BOARD OF EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING AGENDA KIRTLAND HIGH SCHOOL CAFETERIA KIRTLAND BOARD OF EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING AGENDA KIRTLAND HIGH SCHOOL CAFETERIA I. BOARD GOVERNANCE OATH OF OFFICE January 8, 2018 7:00 P.M. In accordance with 3313.10 of the Ohio Revised Code,

More information

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary Jason Zarri 1. An Easy $10.00? Suppose someone were to bet you $10.00 that you would fail a seemingly simple test of your reasoning skills. Feeling

More information

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Session 3 September 9 th, 2015 All About Arguments (Part II) 1 A common theme linking many fallacies is that they make unwarranted assumptions. An assumption is a claim

More information

Employment Agreement

Employment Agreement Employment Agreement Ordained Minister THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN: (Name of the Congregation) (herein called Congregation ) OF THE FIRST PART, -and- (Name of the Ordained Minister) (herein called Ordained

More information

NEW YORK CITY A STANDARDS-BASED SCOPE & SEQUENCE FOR LEARNING READING By the end of the school year, the students should:

NEW YORK CITY A STANDARDS-BASED SCOPE & SEQUENCE FOR LEARNING READING By the end of the school year, the students should: Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Bronze Level 2002 New York City A Standards-Based Scope & Sequence for Learning (Grade 7) READING By the end of the school year, the students

More information

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology 1. Introduction Ryan C. Smith Philosophy 125W- Final Paper April 24, 2010 Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology Throughout this paper, the goal will be to accomplish three

More information

God has a mind- Romans 11:34 "who has known the mind of the Lord

God has a mind- Romans 11:34 who has known the mind of the Lord Basic Logic God has a mind- Romans 11:34 "who has known the mind of the Lord God thinks- Isaiah 55:9 as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my thoughts than (yours) Note: God does not have a

More information

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics Critical Thinking Lecture 1 Background Material for the Exercise on Validity Reasons, Arguments, and the Concept of Validity 1. The Concept of Validity Consider

More information

Fatalism and Truth at a Time Chad Marxen

Fatalism and Truth at a Time Chad Marxen Stance Volume 6 2013 29 Fatalism and Truth at a Time Chad Marxen Abstract: In this paper, I will examine an argument for fatalism. I will offer a formalized version of the argument and analyze one of the

More information

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates All debaters must be financial members of the NZYF Club for which they are debating at the time of each debate. 1. Each team shall consist of three speakers. 2. Responsibilities

More information

Policy: Validation of Ministries

Policy: Validation of Ministries Policy: Validation of Ministries May 8, 2014 Preface The PC(USA) Book of Order provides that the continuing (minister) members of the presbytery shall be either engaged in a ministry validated by that

More information

A-LEVEL Religious Studies

A-LEVEL Religious Studies A-LEVEL Religious Studies RST3B Paper 3B Philosophy of Religion Mark Scheme 2060 June 2017 Version: 1.0 Final Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant

More information

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

Overview: Application: What to Avoid: UNIT 3: BUILDING A BASIC ARGUMENT While "argument" has a number of different meanings, college-level arguments typically involve a few fundamental pieces that work together to construct an intelligent,

More information

The Philosophy of Logic

The Philosophy of Logic The Philosophy of Logic PHL 430-001 Spring 2003 MW: 10:20-11:40 EBH, Rm. 114 Instructor Information Matthew McKeon Office: 503 South Kedzie/Rm. 507 Office hours: Friday--10:30-1:00, and by appt. Telephone:

More information

Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application A

Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application A Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application A The Applied Writing Assignment aims to achieve several of the substantive and generic learning outcomes posited for Constitutional

More information

TEACHER APPLICATION. Name. Current Address. City State Zip. How long have you lived at the above address?

TEACHER APPLICATION. Name. Current Address. City State Zip. How long have you lived at the above address? TEACHER APPLICATION APPLICATION DATE APPLICANT S INFORMATION Name Current Address City State Zip Home Phone Social Security Number Cell Phone How long have you lived at the above address? Please list any

More information

Introduction to Philosophy

Introduction to Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Russell Marcus Hamilton College, Fall 2013 Class 1 - Introduction to Introduction to Philosophy My name is Russell. My office is 202 College Hill Road, Room 210.

More information

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments 1 Agenda 1. What is an Argument? 2. Evaluating Arguments 3. Validity 4. Soundness 5. Persuasive Arguments 6.

More information

In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the

In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the The Flow of Argument Lecture 9 In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the central concept of validity. Visualizing syllogisms in terms of three-circle Venn diagrams gave us

More information

Constructing A Biblical Message

Constructing A Biblical Message Constructing A Biblical Message EXALTING CHRIST PUBLISHING 710 BROADWAY STREET VALLEJO, CA 94590 707-553-8780 www.cbcvallejo.org email: publications@cbcvallejo.org Copyright 2001 Printed By Permission

More information

HITCHIN TOWN HALL LTD Registered Charity No:

HITCHIN TOWN HALL LTD Registered Charity No: WITHOUT PREJUDICE North Hertfordshire District Council Council Offices Gernon Road Letchworth Garden City Hertfordshire SG5 4RJ Attention of the Chief Executive 30 th January 2018 Dear David 14/15 Brand

More information

BOOK REVIEW. Thomas R. Schreiner, Interpreting the Pauline Epistles (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2nd edn, 2011). xv pp. Pbk. US$13.78.

BOOK REVIEW. Thomas R. Schreiner, Interpreting the Pauline Epistles (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2nd edn, 2011). xv pp. Pbk. US$13.78. [JGRChJ 9 (2011 12) R12-R17] BOOK REVIEW Thomas R. Schreiner, Interpreting the Pauline Epistles (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2nd edn, 2011). xv + 166 pp. Pbk. US$13.78. Thomas Schreiner is Professor

More information

Department of Philosophy

Department of Philosophy The University of Alabama at Birmingham 1 Department of Philosophy Chair: Dr. Gregory Pence The Department of Philosophy offers the Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in philosophy, as well as a minor

More information

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy Overview Taking an argument-centered approach to preparing for and to writing the SAT Essay may seem like a no-brainer. After all, the prompt, which is always

More information

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions National Qualifications 06 06 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 06 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only

More information

Philosophy Courses Fall 2011

Philosophy Courses Fall 2011 Philosophy Courses Fall 2011 All philosophy courses satisfy the Humanities requirement -- except 120, which counts as one of the two required courses in Math/Logic. Many philosophy courses (e.g., Business

More information

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism Unit 8 Categorical yllogism What is a syllogism? Inference or reasoning is the process of passing from one or more propositions to another with some justification. This inference when expressed in language

More information

Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application B

Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application B Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application B The Applied Writing Assignment aims to achieve several of the substantive and generic learning outcomes posited for Constitutional

More information