EUROANESTHESIA 2007 Munich, Germany, 9-12 June 2007
|
|
- Milo Young
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EUROANESTHESIA 2007 Munich, Germany, 9-12 June 2007 WHERE DO THE PRINCIPLES OF BIOMEDICAL ETHICS COME FROM? 16RC1 ALEX CAHANA Postoperative and Interventional Pain Program, Department Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Saturday Jun 9, :00-15:45 Room 21 INTRODUCTION Philosophy must be understood backward but lived forward (Kierkegaard 1846, 1992vol 2:187) You will probably find few people who will argue that treating pain is wrong. However this is not the same as asking if treating pain is right, or is always treating pain always right? In order to make the right choice in various situations, where our moral intuition does not always provide adequate and coherent guidance, an understanding of the principles of bioethics is fundamental. You should treat others as you would like to be treated is an old and often useful saying; it allows us to tell moral right from wrong in many circumstances (e.g. preserve life and relieve pain in end-of-life care), but sometimes an act may be simultaneously morally right and wrong (e.g. abortion). So how can we really tell moral right from wrong? In order to answer this and subsequently perform good choices, a theoretical and systematic understanding of our moral life is necessary. Intuition simply does not suffice. If ethical theory provides consistency and rationality necessary for our moral judgment, a philosophical reflection on our moral life through the search of values and norms is needed. In these day-to-day dilemmas, choosing an ethical theory to apply and appropriately implement can be very difficult. Fortunately since 1979, Beauchamp and Childress textbook Principles of Biomedical Ethics serves us with coherent guidelines for practical judgments in medical moral dilemmas, by using four principles: respect of autonomy, non malfeasance, beneficence and justice. But where did these principles come from? Definitely these principles did not appear suddenly as spontaneous creation of the authors, but rather have been conceived from other ethical theories. In this paper we wish to present briefly seven theories which have affected our moral reasoning throughout times and which have, we believe, inspired at least partly the development of principle-based theory. This presentation must not be understood as an exhaustive historical review but rather as a rational reconstruction of conceptual nature. OBJECTIVISM VERSUS SUBJECTIVISM The debate whether morality is objective or subjective dates back to the ancient Greek, found in Plato s dialogues between his teacher Socrates and the Sophists, who were a group of thinkers who held that ethical argument is rather a matter of rhetoric and has nothing to do with true science. That morality is about persuading people to believe what you believe (dogma), rather than proving to them that the beliefs you hold are true (episteme). This dispute continues to date, where on one hand many hold that good, bad, right and wrong reflect opinion and desire (subjectivism), whereas others, like Socrates and Plato, think it reflects the objective nature of things (objectivism). Why is moral subjectivity so obvious? One of the reasons may be that in everyday life there are many conflicting moral opinions, that it is impossible to prove the superiority of one moral view over another; and that there are no observable moral facts. But although moral differences on abortion, euthanasia and capital punishment do exist, there is little moral disagreement on many other issues like slavery, child abuse and cheating at sport. It would be probably difficult to find someone who thinks that rape, murder and theft are good, and that honesty, loyalty and generosity are bad. In general moral problems can be analyzed in four separate attitudes: 1. Hard subjectivism: for every moral question there is never a right answer (Sophists) 2. Soft subjectivism: for many moral questions there are no right answers 3. Hard objectivism: for every moral question there is a right answer (Socrates and Plato) 4. Soft (or reasonable) objectivism: for many moral question there is a right answer Since moral questions pertain to norms and values on what values should a moral theory focus on?
2 EGOISM For many of us the answer to this question would be: rich and famous. Albeit tempting as a response, it is logically incomplete since rich means to have money, and money within itself has only an instrumental, but not intrinsic value. Since money has no value in itself, it seems that the answer should be more like: a life which you are rich enough to do whatever you want and famous for achieving it. Thus the idea that the best life is one in which I ought to aim at getting what I want, is called egoism. The difference between egoism and selfishness is that selfishness is the tendency to seek and promote one s own comfort and satisfaction before that of anybody else. Selfish people always try to get the best seat or the largest slice of cake. By contrast egoism is the belief that I should do what only matters to me, which may include non-selfish acts, like working long hours or promoting my children s education or helping my best friends. This fundamental desire to fulfill personal needs as a centerpiece to a good life is know as rational egoism which recommends to always do whatever one wants, because the only good (that is moral ) reason to do something is because you want to do it. Rational egoism voiced mostly by 19th century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, was in direct conflict with Judeo-Christian tradition of deny thy self. But the Judeo-Christian argument was mainly due to the confusion between the concept of desire (morally reprehensible longings and inclinations) and the concept of self-interest (things of vital importance to my well being). So when returning to the question what is the best sort of life to aim for, the egoist complete answer would be: a life which is in my best interests, interests which are not desires, which have an objective value and have a rational appeal. HEDONISM Since a good life is one in which one promotes its own interest and thus avoids human desires of dubious value, the question to be examined now is what is considered best interest? For the hedonists the answer is quite clear- pleasure. The main aim in life is the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain, so pleasure is what we ought to pursue and pain what we ought to avoid. The most known hedonists were the epicureans, named after the ancient Greek philosopher Epicure who viewed that life must strive at ataraxia and apathia that is tranquility of mind and health of body. Hence the importance of entertaining true opinions (false opinions, especially about God and soul will disturb our temper), to drink good wine, to be in good company and participate in a sophisticated culture. These pleasures are a natural good and are mild and gentle. Thus drunkenness, gluttony and vulgarity are not part of the hedonistic life since they induce pain and displeasure. If hedonism is a natural good, then we are to maximize pleasure and minimize pain in our lives as much as possible. This idea of maximizing the most pleasure for the greatest number possible was developed by 18th- 19th century English philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Contrary to Bentham nevertheless, Mill distinguished between higher and lower pleasures as read in his famous dictum, I prefer to be a dis-satisfied Socrates, than a satisfied pig. Unfortunately Mill did not have a reliable method specifying how to discriminate higher and lower pleasures and thus his idea remained a relatively arbitrary stipulation (he proposed the criterion of the expert, i.e. of the person who knows both types of pleasure). Because all types of pleasures are not good and because there are other goods in life beyond pleasure, any moral theory to develop must include something more than just the promotion of pleasure. Aristotle, Plato s student, proposed that pleasure is indeed good, but it is not the highest good. In fact people seek pleasurable sensations, but only because of the happiness it comes along: we want to be happy, that is to flourish; when we succeed, we feel pleasure, but pleasure is only an accompanying good. So the life we seek is a pleasurable and happy life, but is it a good one? What constitutes a good and morally worthy life? VIRTUE THEORY For Aristotle it is not pleasure that is important as the hedonists claimed, but rather happiness (eudaimonia), and it is happiness which is of moral value. It is the happy life, which we must pursue and in order to obtain eudaimonia one must excel, seek wisdom and share this wisdom with others (friendship). But excellence (arete) is for Aristotle the same as virtue (a virtue is an excellence). So virtues such as practical wisdom (phronesis) and social skills (professionalism) are the supreme values that construct a worthy happy life. There are several manners to lead a virtuous life, because virtues are numerous; and more generally, a good life for a human being is not the same as a good life for a God or for non-human animals. In other words, good means not any good, but good-for-man
3 EXISTENTIALISM The question how shall I live is inescapably existential, because nothing determines its answer except ourselves, and this remains true even if we adopt a theological ethics (if we follow or try to follow God s commands) or any other objective moral doctrine. We alone are responsible for the decisions we make. Therefore existentialists, especially the 20th century French philosopher Jean Paul Sartre, emphasize that moral conduct is based on responsibility, liberty and autonomy. According to Sartre there are two modes of existence. One is being-in-itself, like trees and stones, versus one being-for-itself, aware of- or value for- themselves as human beings. Humans are special since this awareness of oneself and understanding of the world creates a moral obligation to live an authentic life authenticity is the fundamental value so that a worthy life is an authentic one, which in turn is not necessarily pleasant. So, what is important for existentialists is not what is chosen as a moral act, but rather the manner in which it is chosen. They call fleeing from painful moral decisions and giving oneself deterministic excuses bad faith, which suggests in turn that we are autonomous moral agents and that we alone, not God or nature, are responsible for our acts. It is wrong to think that one chooses pre-existing values from a catalogue, but rather the act of choice itself, in radical liberty, confers it value. Moreover, context is very important: ethical theory is something practical, within a social construct and is based on acting in good faith. The heart of existentialism is radical freedom in respect to moral norms, a freedom that we are condemned to. By our choice we define ourselves and we must assume full responsibility of these choices. These choices are difficult since it is easy to behave in bad faith, that is without being faithful to one s own liberty. For those who are skeptical with this concept of radical freedom but still want to take responsibility and liberty seriously, the question that arises is how do we make these right choices? What guides us into good faith? KANTIANISM For the 18th century German philosopher Immanuel Kant the answer was simple- reason. Since material benefits (goods that are of value for egoism and hedonism) or personal talents (important goods for virtue theory and existentialism) can be used well or badly, they cannot constitute the principle of moral good. Thus only reason can guide us into proper moral conduct, doing-the-right-thing. Among all moral theories it is probably that of Kant, which has most influenced principle-based theory of bioethics. For Kant the question of a good life is fraught with ambiguity. Do we mean the happiest life which makes it worthy or the worthiest life which makes us happy? In order to answer this Kant says that what matters from a moral point of view is not what we do, but what we intend to do and adds that our intentions (will) and actions should be tested in their ability to be applied everywhere by everybody (universalizability). In other words, people do what is right because it is right, regardless to whether it gives them or others pleasure (as it is the case with desires or inclinations). Desires and natural inclinations are a morally irrelevant and only good will count that is a will in conformity with universal rules. Kant referred these universal rules as categorical imperatives, which basically state that for pure practical reason one must act like this. Thus Kant s moral ought transcends desires and wants. We are not asking what will everyone do, but rather what if everyone was to do it? (i.e. lie, steal, cheat etc.). Kant puts his categorical imperative like this: I should never act in such a way that I could not also want that my maxim should be a universal law. More precisely, Kant believes that there is a unique categorical imperative: every rule of duty, i.e. maxim, if it is to be morally right, must be in accordance with this imperative that is with the requirement of universalizability. So, it is not possible to be caught in a real moral dilemma. But this imperative has a second reading, too: I should never act in such a way that I treat another person like a mere mean or instrument for the ends I pursue. It does not consist in a second new imperative; it expresses the same one, because nobody could rationally want to be treated like a mere mean. This second reading has a deep and central impact on our ethical and bioethical beliefs: everybody agrees now that it is forbidden to instrumentalize a human person, it is a violation of her dignity ( dignity is a concept whose modern roots are in the Kantian thought, too). The main problem however with Kantian law is that the moral emphasis is only on our intention and will to do our duty, without looking at the consequences of our acts
4 UTILITARIANISM If Kant s conception of best human life is that of moral duty, others criticized this concept as duty for the sake of duty and returned to the importance of giving place to a happy and fulfilling life. Thus we return to the idea of maximizing happiness and minimizing pain in the world, otherwise known as the greatest happiness principle. This principle, as mentioned, introduced by Jeremy Bentham and further developed by his compatriot John Stuart Mill, stated that my pleasures and pains are not to be regarded by me as anymore important than yours, when it comes to deciding what is right or wrong for me or anyone else. This of course ensures that utilitarianism is not a selfish doctrine: impartiality is for it a cardinal virtue. But utilitarianism is neither an altruistic theory where we put other s interest before our own (impartiality is not altruism; it is a kind of equality). On the contrary, individuals may suffer in the name of utility. In order to avoid unacceptable acts on individuals (for example to kill one to save many others) contemporary utilitarians also introduced an important distinction between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism, where the latter assures conduct most conducive to greatest happiness. Thus even in a context of where killing one to save many others would be an act utilitarianism, the rule precludes this because the consequences of a rule permitting the murder of an innocent for the greatest common good, would in fact decrease the greater happiness (nobody will be in security anymore). We see then that utilitarianism has a hedonic aspect to it, but more importantly a consequentialist feature, which puts it in direct opposition to Kant (which gives importance to duty for the duty s sake) and to existentialism (which prides in liberty). Thus in Kant s eyes the acts of Don Quixote (fighting mills) are morally worthy since his intentions (fight evil) are morally worthy, in Sartre s eyes these acts are morally worthy since Don Quixote is true to himself, whereas for the utilitarian, these acts are of no moral value since they are of no consequence. FINAL REMARKS: PRINCIPLE-BASED THEORY IN BIOETHICS- A POTPOURRI OF MORAL THEORIES So how do we decide what is right or wrong in face of a moral problem or dilemma? After this brief tour of various moral theories one can confidently identify the diverse influences of each one found in principlebased theory of bioethics, namely respect of autonomy, non-malfeasance, beneficence and justice. First soft or reasonable objectivism that states that for many moral question there is a right answer because for any moral question there might be a right answer, presents the interest in developing a systematic approach to deal with moral dilemmas and not to count upon a moral intuition alone. Egoism, different from selfishness, inspires the principle of beneficence in emphasizing that one s own desire (e.g. patient) is of moral value and merits to be the center of a good life. Hedonism, which replaces desires with maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain, reminds us that nonmalfeasance is an important principle to follow. Virtue theory, stating that a happy virtuous life is the most important value to attain, presents itself in the principles of bioethics as strive of doctors to promote good as a deontological obligation, as part of professional excellence. The radical freedom expressed in existentialism translates itself into the importance for the person, be she a doctor or a patient, to accept full responsibility for one s own decision. Kantianism is without doubt the greatest inspirer of the principle to respect of autonomy, but maybe more in words than in fact, because it defines autonomy as the capacity to give oneself moral rules (auto-nomoi); so, for him, it is only by applying categorical imperative, regardless to pleasure or consequence, that one expresses his dignity as a moral subject. So the autonomous person, if she is really autonomous, must choose under the constraint of the moral law. In bioethics, autonomy refers generally more to liberty (Locke and liberalism) and even sometimes to radical freedom (existentialism). Utilitarianism has influenced the principle of distributive justice and has defined guidelines for moral conduct within the social agreement. In summary we have tried to show that the four principles of bioethics have all been inspired from various moral theories. As our presentation is a conceptual reconstruction, it does not pretend full historical accuracy. Critiques say that ethical principlism is actually ethical fundamentalism and claims with good reason that other theories may have influenced bioethics as well (Hans Jonas ethics of responsibility, Carol Gilligan feminist ethics of care, Emmanuel Levinas ethics of alterity, to name a few). However we postulate that in order to understand well the strength and the limits of Beauchamp and Childress Principles of Biomedical Ethics, it is imperative to be aware of its vast and multiple origins. Once we master this we can try and answer more specifically, is treating pain the right thing to do
5 SUGGESTED READINGS: INTRODUCTION: Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, 2001 OBJECTIVISM VS. SUBJECTIVISM Pappas N, Plato and the Republic. London, Routledge, 2003 EGOISM Young J, The death of God and the meaning of life. London and New York, Routledge, 2003 HEDONISM Gosling JCB. The Greeks on pleasure. Oxford, Clarendon press, 1982 VIRTUE THEORY Hughes G, Aristotle on Ethics. London and New York, Routledge, 2001 EXISTENTIALISM Howells C, The Cambridge Companion to Sartre. Cambridge University Press, 1992 KANTIANISM Stratton-Lake P, Kant, Duty and Moral worth, London and New York, Routledge, 2000 UTILITARIANISM Crisp R, Mill on Utilitarianism. London and New York, Routledge, 1997 CONTRACTUALISM Rawls J, A theory of Justice, Oxford University Press,
16RC1 Cahana. Medical professionalism: Where does it come from? A review of different moral theories. Alex Cahana. Introduction
16RC1 Cahana Medical professionalism: Where does it come from? A review of different moral theories Alex Cahana Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Department Bioethics & Humanities University
More informationQ2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result.
QUIZ 1 ETHICAL ISSUES IN MEDIA, BUSINESS AND SOCIETY WHAT IS ETHICS? Business ethics deals with values, facts, and arguments. Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be
More informationAltruism. A selfless concern for other people purely for their own sake. Altruism is usually contrasted with selfishness or egoism in ethics.
GLOSSARY OF ETHIC TERMS Absolutism. The belief that there is one and only one truth; those who espouse absolutism usually also believe that they know what this absolute truth is. In ethics, absolutism
More informationA Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1
310 Book Review Book Review ISSN (Print) 1225-4924, ISSN (Online) 2508-3104 Catholic Theology and Thought, Vol. 79, July 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.21731/ctat.2017.79.310 A Review on What Is This Thing
More informationPhilosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology
More informationTake Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #2 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 8-15. Matching and fill-in-the-blank questions
More informationChapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics
Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;
More informationDefinitions: Values and Moral Values
Definitions: Values and Moral Values 1. Values those things that we care about; those things that matter to us; those goals or ideals to which we aspire and by which we measure ourselves and others in
More informationA primer of major ethical theories
Chapter 1 A primer of major ethical theories Our topic in this course is privacy. Hence we want to understand (i) what privacy is and also (ii) why we value it and how this value is reflected in our norms
More informationLecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. What answer (A E) do you think will have been selected most frequently in the previous poll? Recap: Unworkable
More informationPHIL%13:%Ethics;%Fall%2012% David%O.%Brink;%UCSD% Syllabus% Part%I:%Challenges%to%Moral%Theory 1.%Relativism%and%Tolerance.
Draftof8)27)12 PHIL%13:%Ethics;%Fall%2012% David%O.%Brink;%UCSD% Syllabus% Hereisalistoftopicsandreadings.Withinatopic,dothereadingsintheorderinwhich theyarelisted.readingsaredrawnfromthethreemaintexts
More informationMoral Philosophy : Utilitarianism
Moral Philosophy : Utilitarianism Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a moral theory that was developed by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). It is a teleological or consequentialist
More informationMaking Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders
Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? - My boss - The shareholders - Other stakeholders - Basic principles about conduct and its impacts - What is good for me - What
More informationDEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS In ethical theories, if we mainly focus on the action itself, then we use deontological ethics (also known as deontology or duty ethics). In duty ethics, an action is morally right
More informationMill s Utilitarian Theory
Normative Ethics Mill s Utilitarian Theory John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism The Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they
More informationThe Pleasure Imperative
The Pleasure Imperative Utilitarianism, particularly the version espoused by John Stuart Mill, is probably the best known consequentialist normative ethical theory. Furthermore, it is probably the most
More informationLecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. (thanks to Rodrigo for suggesting this quiz) Ethical Egoism Achievement of your happiness is the only moral
More informationSUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6
SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6 Textbook: Louis P. Pojman, Editor. Philosophy: The quest for truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 0199697310; ISBN-13: 9780199697311 (6th Edition)
More informationChallenges to Traditional Morality
Challenges to Traditional Morality Altruism Behavior that benefits others at some cost to oneself and that is motivated by the desire to benefit others Some Ordinary Assumptions About Morality (1) People
More information-- did you get a message welcoming you to the cours reflector? If not, please correct what s needed.
1 -- did you get a message welcoming you to the coursemail reflector? If not, please correct what s needed. 2 -- don t use secondary material from the web, as its quality is variable; cf. Wikipedia. Check
More informationIntroduction to Ethics
Question 1: What is act-utilitarianism? Answer 1: Act-utilitarianism is a theory that is commonly presented in the writings of Jeremy Bentham and looks at the consequences of a specific act in determining
More informationKant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals
Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into
More informationCHAPTER 2 Test Bank MULTIPLE CHOICE
CHAPTER 2 Test Bank MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. A structured set of principles that defines what is moral is referred to as: a. a norm system b. an ethical system c. a morality guide d. a principled guide ANS:
More informationLecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics
Lecture 12 Deontology Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics 1 Agenda 1. Immanuel Kant 2. Deontology 3. Hypothetical vs. Categorical Imperatives 4. Formula of the End in Itself 5. Maxims and
More informationEvaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule
UTILITARIAN ETHICS Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule A dilemma You are a lawyer. You have a client who is an old lady who owns a big house. She tells you that
More informationNORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY DHAKA, BANGLADESH
NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY DHAKA, BANGLADESH Semester: Spring 2016 Course Code: PHI 104 (Section: 2) Class Time: ST 04.20 PM-05.50 PM Course Title: Introduction to Ethics
More informationSuppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions
Suppose.... Kant You are a good swimmer and one day at the beach you notice someone who is drowning offshore. Consider the following three scenarios. Which one would Kant says exhibits a good will? Even
More informationKANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)
KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an opponent of utilitarianism. Basic Summary: Kant, unlike Mill, believed that certain types of actions (including murder,
More informationCourse Syllabus Ethics PHIL 330, Fall, 2009
Instructor: Dr. Matt Zwolinski Office Hours: MW: 12:00-2:00; F: 11:15-12:15 Office: F167A Course Website: http://pope.sandiego.edu/ Phone: 619-260-4094 Email: mzwolinski@sandiego.edu Course Syllabus Ethics
More informationKant's Moral Philosophy
Kant's Moral Philosophy I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (178.5)- Immanuel Kant A. Aims I. '7o seek out and establish the supreme principle of morality." a. To provide a rational basis for morality.
More informationChapter 2: Reasoning about ethics
Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics 2012 Cengage Learning All Rights reserved Learning Outcomes LO 1 Explain how important moral reasoning is and how to apply it. LO 2 Explain the difference between facts
More informationWednesday, April 20, 16. Introduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy In your notebooks answer the following questions: 1. Why am I here? (in terms of being in this course) 2. Why am I here? (in terms of existence) 3. Explain what the unexamined
More informationDeontological Ethics
Deontological Ethics From Jane Eyre, the end of Chapter XXVII: (Mr. Rochester is the first speaker) And what a distortion in your judgment, what a perversity in your ideas, is proved by your conduct! Is
More informationGS SCORE ETHICS - A - Z. Notes
ETHICS - A - Z Absolutism Act-utilitarianism Agent-centred consideration Agent-neutral considerations : This is the view, with regard to a moral principle or claim, that it holds everywhere and is never
More informationChapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System
Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Ethics and Morality Ethics: greek ethos, study of morality What is Morality? Morality: system of rules for guiding
More informationChapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics
Chapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. Consequentialism a. is best represented by Ross's theory of ethics. b. states that sometimes the consequences of our actions can be morally relevant.
More informationComputer Ethics. Normative Ethics Ethical Theories. Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018
Normative Ethics Ethical Theories Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018 Overview (van de Poel and Royakkers 2011) 2 Ethical theories Relativism and absolutism Consequentialist approaches: utilitarianism
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus Class 26 - April 27 Kantian Ethics Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 Mill s Defense of Utilitarianism P People desire happiness.
More information24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. Three Moral Theories
More informationfactors in Bentham's hedonic calculus.
Answers to quiz 1. An autonomous person: a) is socially isolated from other people. b) directs his or her actions on the basis his or own basic values, beliefs, etc. c) is able to get by without the help
More informationCOURSE OUTLINE. Philosophy 116 (C-ID Number: PHIL 120) Ethics for Modern Life (Title: Introduction to Ethics)
Degree Applicable Glendale Community College November 2013 I. Catalog Statement COURSE OUTLINE Philosophy 116 (C-ID Number: PHIL 120) Ethics for Modern Life (Title: Introduction to Ethics) Philosophy 116
More informationDeontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT
Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT KANT S OBJECTIONS TO UTILITARIANISM: 1. Utilitarianism takes no account of integrity - the accidental act or one done with evil intent if promoting good ends
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus Class 28 -Kantian Ethics Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 The Good Will P It is impossible to conceive anything at all in
More informationDeontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT
Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT A NOTE ON READING KANT Lord Macaulay once recorded in his diary a memorable attempt his first and apparently his last to read Kant s Critique: I received today
More informationShort Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 5 points).
HU2700 Spring 2008 Midterm Exam Answer Key There are two sections: a short answer section worth 25 points and an essay section worth 75 points. No materials (books, notes, outlines, fellow classmates,
More informationIntroduction to Ethics
Introduction to Ethics Auburn University Department of Philosophy PHIL 1020 Fall Semester, 2015 Syllabus Instructor: Email: Version 1.0. The schedule of readings is subject to revision. Students are responsible
More informationKant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons
Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons Some Possibly Helpful Terminology Normative moral theories can be categorized according to whether the theory is primarily focused on judgments of value or judgments
More informationChapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363)
Chapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363) Moral reasoning (p. 364) Value-judgements Some people argue that moral values are just reflections of personal taste. For example, I don t like spinach is
More informationChapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior
Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. A structured set of principles that defines what is moral is referred to as: a. a norm system b. an ethical system c. a morality guide d. a principled
More informationLecture Notes Rosalind Hursthouse, Normative Virtue Ethics (1996, 2013) Keith Burgess-Jackson 4 May 2016
Lecture Notes Rosalind Hursthouse, Normative Virtue Ethics (1996, 2013) Keith Burgess-Jackson 4 May 2016 0. Introduction. Hursthouse s aim in this essay is to defend virtue ethics against the following
More informationFUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS. by Immanuel Kant
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS SECOND SECTION by Immanuel Kant TRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS... This principle, that humanity and generally every
More informationDo you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014
Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationTeleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?
1. Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 2. Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationPhilosophical Ethics. Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics)
Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics) Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics) Consequentialism the value of an action (the action's moral worth, its rightness or wrongness) derives entirely from
More informationSummary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
Summary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Version 1.1 Richard Baron 2 October 2016 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Availability and licence............ 3 2 Definitions of key terms 4 3
More informationA. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics. 2. Normative Ethics
A. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics 1. Meta-ethics 2. Normative Ethics 3. Applied Ethics 1 B. Meta-ethics consists in the attempt to answer the fundamental philosophical questions
More informationQuote. Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas. Chapter Two. Determining Moral Behavior. Integrity is doing the right thing--even if nobody is watching
Chapter Two Determining Moral Behavior Quote Integrity is doing the right thing--even if nobody is watching - Unknown Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas 1 - Identify the facts 2 Identify relevant values and concepts
More informationMGT610 Business Ethics
MIDTERM EXAMINATION MGT610 Business Ethics BY VIRTUALIANS.PK Question # 01 Mark: 1 The three major types of ethical issues include except? Communication issues Systematic issues Corporate issues Individual
More informationConsequentialism. Mill s Theory of Utility
Consequentialism Mill s Theory of Utility Consequentialism Theory of Normative Ethics Has a different way of determining what the good life is from Aristotle: J.S. MILL: Good -----> THEORY OF CONSEQUENTIALISM
More informationMoral Theory. What makes things right or wrong?
Moral Theory What makes things right or wrong? Consider: Moral Disagreement We have disagreements about right and wrong, about how people ought or ought not act. When we do, we (sometimes!) reason with
More information(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.
Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality?
More informationETHICAL THEORIES. Review week 6 session 11. Ethics Ethical Theories Review. Socrates. Socrate s theory of virtue. Socrate s chain of injustices
Socrates ETHICAL THEORIES Review week 6 session 11 Greece (470 to 400 bc) Was Plato s teacher Didn t write anything Died accused of corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods of the city Creator
More informationTuesday, September 2, Idealism
Idealism Enlightenment Puzzle How do these fit into a scientific picture of the world? Norms Necessity Universality Mind Idealism The dominant 19th-century response: often today called anti-realism Everything
More informationPH 101: Problems of Philosophy. Section 005, Monday & Thursday 11:00 a.m. - 12:20 p.m. Course Description:
PH 101: Problems of Philosophy INSTRUCTOR: Stephen Campbell Section 005, Monday & Thursday 11:00 a.m. - 12:20 p.m. Course Description: This course seeks to help students develop their capacity to think
More informationHumanities 4: Lectures Kant s Ethics
Humanities 4: Lectures 17-19 Kant s Ethics 1 Method & Questions Purpose and Method: Transition from Common Sense to Philosophical Understanding of Morality Analysis of everyday moral concepts Main Questions:
More informationEthics. PHIL 181 Spring 2018 SUMMARY OBJECTIVES
Ethics PHIL 181 Spring 2018 Instructor: Dr. Stefano Giacchetti M/W 5.00-6.15 Office hours M/W 2-3 (by appointment) E-Mail: sgiacch@luc.edu SUMMARY Short Description: This course will investigate some of
More informationBasics of Ethics CS 215 Denbigh Starkey
Basics of Ethics CS 215 Denbigh Starkey 1. Introduction 1 2. Morality vs. ethics 1 3. Some ethical theories 3 a. Subjective relativism 3 b. Cultural relativism 3 c. Divine command theory 3 d. The golden
More information24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy
Mill s Utilitarianism I. Introduction Recall that there are four questions one might ask an ethical theory to answer: a) Which acts are right and which are wrong? Which acts ought we to perform (understanding
More informationPROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CD5590 LECTURE 1 Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mälardalen University 2005 1 Course Preliminaries Identifying Moral
More informationUtilitarianism pp
Utilitarianism pp. 430-445. Assuming that moral realism is true and that there are objectively true moral principles, what are they? What, for example, is the correct principle concerning lying? Three
More informationLYING TEACHER S NOTES
TEACHER S NOTES INTRO Each student has to choose one of the following topics. The other students have to ask questions on that topic. During the discussion, the student has to lie once. The other students
More informationTheme 1: Ethical Thought, AS. divine command as an objective metaphysical foundation for morality.
Theme 1: Ethical Thought, AS A. Divine Command Theory Meta-ethical theory - God as the origin and regulator of morality right or wrong as objective truths based on God s will/command, moral goodness is
More informationChapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:
Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS MGT604 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After exploring this chapter, you will be able to: 1. Explain the ethical framework of utilitarianism. 2. Describe how utilitarian
More informationNormative Ethical Theories
Normative Ethical Theories I. Normative Ethics A Normative Ethical Theory is a philosophical theory about the fundamental principles of morality. A fundamental principle of morality is a moral obligation
More informationDEONTOLOGY AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY
Current Ethical Debates UNIT 2 DEONTOLOGY AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Contents 2.0 Objectives 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Good Will 2.3 Categorical Imperative 2.4 Freedom as One of the Three Postulates 2.5 Human
More informationEthical Analysis: PRINCIPLISM. Patrick T. Smith, Ph.D.
Ethical Analysis: PRINCIPLISM Patrick T. Smith, Ph.D. Lecturer, Department of Global Health & Social Medicine Core Faculty, Harvard Center for Bioethics The Case of Dolores Some Ethical Questions What
More informationSPS103 LAW AND ETHICS
SPS103 LAW AND ETHICS Full Course Title: Law and Ethics Pravo i etika Course Code: Course Level/BiH cycle: SPS103 I cycle; 1 st year ECTS credit value: 6 Student work-load: For the whole semester: Lectures
More informationCS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics
CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics Sources: Baase: A Gift of Fire and Quinn: Ethics for the Information Age CS305-Spring 2010 Ethics 1 What is Ethics? A branch of philosophy that studies priciples relating
More informationThinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making
Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making Developed by Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer Moral issues greet us each morning in the newspaper, confront
More informationThe view that all of our actions are done in self-interest is called psychological egoism.
Egoism For the last two classes, we have been discussing the question of whether any actions are really objectively right or wrong, independently of the standards of any person or group, and whether any
More informationKant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes. Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2.
Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2 Kant s analysis of the good differs in scope from Aristotle s in two ways. In
More informationBenjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy
Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy Kantian Ethics I. Context II. The Good Will III. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation of Universal Law IV. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 8 March 1 st, 2016 Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics 1 Ø Today we begin Unit 2 of the course, focused on Normative Ethics = the practical development of standards for right
More informationUndergraduate Calendar Content
PHILOSOPHY Note: See beginning of Section H for abbreviations, course numbers and coding. Introductory and Intermediate Level Courses These 1000 and 2000 level courses have no prerequisites, and except
More informationNotes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning
Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning The final chapter of Moore and Parker s text is devoted to how we might apply critical reasoning in certain philosophical contexts.
More informationMoral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View
Chapter 98 Moral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View Lars Leeten Universität Hildesheim Practical thinking is a tricky business. Its aim will never be fulfilled unless influence on practical
More informationDeontology. Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Founder of Deontology The right act is that which is in accordance with the correct moral rule (GK. deon) or principle (Kant calls these maxims ) Rejects hedonism Rejects consequentialism
More informationUnits. Year 1 Unit 1: Course Overview. 1:1 - Getting Started 1:2 - Introducing Philosophy SL 1:3 - Assessment and Tools
Philosophy SL Units All Pamoja courses are written by experienced subject matter experts and integrate the principles of TOK and the approaches to learning of the IB learner profile. This course has been
More informationShort Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 4 points).
Humanities 2702 Fall 2007 Midterm Exam There are two sections: a short answer section worth 24 points and an essay section worth 75 points you get one point for writing your name! No materials (books,
More informationDuty and Categorical Rules. Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena
Duty and Categorical Rules Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena Preview This selection from Kant includes: The description of the Good Will The concept of Duty An introduction
More informationIntroduction to Ethics
Instructor: Email: Introduction to Ethics Auburn University Department of Philosophy PHIL 1020 Fall Quarter, 2014 Syllabus Version 1.9. The schedule of readings is subject to revisions. Students are responsible
More informationFrom the Categorical Imperative to the Moral Law
From the Categorical Imperative to the Moral Law Marianne Vahl Master Thesis in Philosophy Supervisor Olav Gjelsvik Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Arts and Ideas UNIVERSITY OF OSLO May
More information#NLCU. The Ethical Leader: Rules and Tools
The Ethical Leader: Rules and Tools #NLCU March 12, 2017 Washington, DC Dr. Scott Paine Director, Leadership Development and Education Florida League of Cities Agenda So What is Ethics? Sample Ethical
More informationSocratic and Platonic Ethics
Socratic and Platonic Ethics G. J. Mattey Winter, 2017 / Philosophy 1 Ethics and Political Philosophy The first part of the course is a brief survey of important texts in the history of ethics and political
More informationEthical Theories. A (Very) Brief Introduction
Ethical Theories A (Very) Brief Introduction Last time, a definition Ethics: The discipline that deals with right and wrong, good and bad, especially with respect to human conduct. Well, for one thing,
More informationHOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM Northeast College NOLN
Instructor contact information HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM Northeast College NOLN Instructor: Ferdinand R. Durano Office hours: By appointment only E-mail: Ferdinand.durano@hccs.edu Course Title:
More informationBackward Looking Theories, Kant and Deontology
Backward Looking Theories, Kant and Deontology Study Guide Forward v. Backward Looking Theories Kant Goodwill Duty Categorical Imperative For Next Time: Rawls, Selections from A Theory of Justice Study
More informationKantian Ethics: Scope and Limits to Kant s Concept of Duty
Kantian Ethics: Scope and Limits to Kant s Concept of Duty Lermsey Lerrins M. Reynoso Abstract: The research explores the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant and compares the richness of his ethical thoughts
More informationPhilosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.
Philosophical Ethics The nature of ethical analysis Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2. How to resolve ethical issues? censorship abortion affirmative action How do we defend our moral
More information1 Hans Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), 1-10.
Introduction This book seeks to provide a metaethical analysis of the responsibility ethics of two of its prominent defenders: H. Richard Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas. In any ethical writings, some use
More information