16RC1 Cahana. Medical professionalism: Where does it come from? A review of different moral theories. Alex Cahana. Introduction
|
|
- Harry Paul
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 16RC1 Cahana Medical professionalism: Where does it come from? A review of different moral theories Alex Cahana Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Department Bioethics & Humanities University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA Philosophy must be understood backward but lived forward (Kierkegaard 1846, 1992, vol 2:187) Introduction This is an article about ethics. It is about making the right choice in various situations where our moral intuition does not always provide adequate and coherent guidance. You should treat others as you would like to be treated is an old and often useful saying; it allows us to tell moral right from wrong in many circumstances (e.g. preserve life and relieve pain in end-of-life care), but sometimes an act may be simultaneously morally right and wrong (e.g. abortion). So how can we really tell moral right from wrong? In order to answer this and subsequently behave professionaly and perform good choices, a theoretical and systematic understanding of our moral life is necessary. Intuition simply does not suffice. If ethical theory provides consistency and rationality necessary for our moral judgment, a philosophical reflection on our moral life through the search of values and norms is needed. In these day-to-day dilemmas, choosing an ethical theory to apply and appropriately implement can be very difficult. Fortunately since 1979, Beauchamp and Childress textbook Principles of Biomedical Ethics serves us with coherent guidelines for practical judgments in medical ethical dilemmas and sets the tone for our professional behavior. Where did these principles come from? They definitely did not appear suddenly as spontaneous creation of the authors, but rather have been conceived from other ethical theories. In this manuscript I wish to present briefly eight theories which have affected our moral reasoning throughout times and which have I believe, inspired at least partly the development of medical professionalism and deontology (duty). This presentation should not be taken as an exhaustive historical review but rather as a rational reconstruction of conceptual nature. Objectivism versus Subjectivism The debate whether morality is objective or subjective dates back to the ancient Greek, found in Plato s dialogues between his teacher Socrates and the Sophists, who were a group of thinkers who held that ethical argument is rather a matter of rhetoric and has nothing to do with true science. They contended that moral discussion is about persuading people to believe what you believe (dogma), rather than proving to them that the beliefs you hold are true (episteme). This dispute continues today, where on one hand many hold that good, bad, right and wrong reflect opinion and desire (subjectivism), whereas others, like Socrates and Plato, think it reflects the objective nature of things (objectivism). Why is moral subjectivity so obvious? Perhaps because there are so many conflicting moral opinions; or because it is impossible to prove the superiority of one moral view over another; or because there are no observable moral facts. But although moral differences on abortion, euthanasia and capital punishment do exist, there is little moral disagreement on many other issues like slavery, child abuse and cheating at sport. It would be probably difficult to find someone who thinks that rape, murder and theft are good, and that honesty, loyalty and generosity are bad. Take this moral inference for example: - 1 -
2 1. You promised to visit your neighbour in the hospital. 2. Promises ought to be kept 3. So, you ought to visit your neighbour in the hospital. Moral subjectivism concedes that you can draw valid inferences like that one because from a logical point of view, if you accept propositions number 1 and number 2, you necessarily arrive at a moral conclusion (number 3). What moral subjectivism denies is the objective truth of the second proposition: for it, that promises ought to be kept is only a matter of opinion or of taste. On the contrary, for moral objectivism, that promises ought to be kept is really binding because it is true, and as every moral norm has the same status, there is a right answer for every moral dilemma. Moral questions pertain to norms and values. But on what values should a moral theory focus? The more convenient way to answer this question is to ask another one: What is, morally speaking, the best sort of life to aim for? Egoism For many of us the answer to this question would be: rich and famous. Albeit tempting as a response, it is logically incomplete since rich means to have money, and money within itself has only an instrumental, not intrinsic value. Since money has no value in itself, it seems that the answer should be: a life which you are rich enough to do whatever you want and famous for achieving it. Thus the idea that the best life is one in which I ought to aim at getting what I want, is called egoism (and not selfishness as we shall see). Now it is important to distinguish egoism from the subjectivism described earlier. For the subjectivist moral conduct could be prompted and justified by any general human subjective feeling and not necessarily one s own will. For the egoist on the other hand, moral ought depends exclusively on one s want to. For example: Suppose I can advance my career dishonestly. Why should I be honest? For the subjectivist, honesty is in the eye of the beholder and so there is really no moral problem, whereas for the egoist the moral question is: do I have a reason to be honest when it is not in my interest to do so? This difference brings into light another important distinction, that between egoism and selfishness. Selfishness is the tendency to seek and promote one s own comfort and satisfaction before that of anybody else. Selfish people always try to get the best seat or the largest slice of cake. By contrast egoism is the belief that I should do what only matters to me, which may include non-selfish acts, like working long hours or helping my best friends. This fundamental desire to fulfill personal needs as a centerpiece to a good life is know as rational egoism which recommends to always do whatever one wants, because the only good (that is moral ) reason to do something is because you want to do it. Needless to say that rational egoism voiced mostly by 19th century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, was in direct conflict with Judeo-Christian tradition of deny thy self. But the Judeo-Christian argument was mainly due to the confusion between the concept of desire (morally reprehensible longings and inclinations) and the concept of self-interest (things of vital importance to my well being). So when returning to the question what is the best sort of life to aim for, the egoist complete answer would be: a life which is in my best interests, interests which are not desires, which have an objective (not subjective) value and have a rational appeal. Thus any ethical theory to develop must include the concept of in-my-interest. But what is in-my-interest? - 2 -
3 Hedonism Since a good life is one in which one promotes one s interest and thus avoids human desires of dubious value, the question to be examined now is what is considered best interest? For the hedonists the answer is quite clear - pleasure. The main aim in life is the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain, so pleasure is what we ought to pursue and pain what we ought to avoid. The most known hedonists were the epicureans, named after the ancient Greek philosopher Epicure who viewed that life must strive at ataraxia and apathia, that is tranquility of mind and health of body. Hence the importance of entertaining true opinions (false opinions will disturb our temper), to drink good wine, to be in good company and participate in sophisticated culture. These pleasures are a natural good and are mild and gentle. Thus drunkenness, gluttony and vulgarity are not part of the hedonistic life since they induce pain and displeasure. If hedonism is a natural good, then we are to maximize pleasure and minimize pain in our lives as much as possible. This idea of maximizing the most pleasure for the greatest number of people possible was developed by 18 th -19th century English philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Contrary to Bentham nevertheless, Mill distinguished between higher and lower pleasures as read in his famous dictum, I prefer to be a dissatisfied Socrates, than a satisfied pig. Unfortunately Mill did not have a reliable method specifying how to discriminate higher and lower pleasures and thus his idea remained a relatively arbitrary stipulation (he proposed the criterion of the expert, i.e. of the person who knows both types of pleasure). Because all types of pleasures are not good and because there are other goods in life beyond pleasure, any moral theory to develop must include something more than just the promotion of pleasure. Aristotle, proposed that pleasure is indeed good, but it is not the highest good. In fact people seek pleasurable sensations, but only because of the happiness it comes along: we want to be happy, that is to flourish; when we succeed, we feel pleasure, but pleasure is only an accompanying good. So the life we seek is a pleasurable and happy life, but is it a good one? What constitutes a good and morally worthy life? Virtue theory For Aristotle it is not pleasure that is important as the hedonists claimed, but rather happiness (eudaimonia), and it is happiness which is of moral value. It is the happy life, which we must pursue and in order to obtain eudaimonia one must excel, seek wisdom and share this wisdom with others (friendship). But excellence (arête) is for Aristotle the same as virtue. So virtues such as practical or moral wisdom (phronesis) and social skills (professionalism) are the supreme values that construct a worthy happy life. Good means not any good, but good-for-man. Existentialism The question how shall I live is inescapably existential, because nothing determines its answer except ourselves, and this remains true even if we adopt a theological ethics or any other moral doctrine. We alone are responsible for the decisions we make. Therefore existentialists, especially the 20 th century French philosopher Jean Paul Sartre, emphasize that moral conduct is based on responsibility, liberty and autonomy. What is important for existentialists is not what is chosen as a moral act, but rather the manner in which it is chosen. They call fleeing from painful moral decisions and giving oneself deterministic excuses bad faith, which suggests in turn that we are autonomous moral agents and that we alone, are responsible for our acts. It is wrong to think that one chooses pre-existing values from a catalogue, but rather the act of choice itself, in radical liberty, confers it value (existentialism is a form of ethical anti-realism: values do not pre-exist in a platonic world, they are created by free acts). Moreover, context is very important: ethical theory is something practical, within a social construct and is based on acting in good faith
4 So the heart of existentialism is radical freedom in respect to moral norms, a freedom that we are condemned to. By our choice we define ourselves and we must assume full responsibility for these choices. These choices are difficult since it is easy to behave in bad faith. For those who are skeptical with this concept of radical freedom but still want to take responsibility and liberty seriously, the question that arises is how do we make these right choices? What guides us into good faith? Kantianism For the 18 th century German philosopher Immanuel Kant the answer was simple - reason. Since material benefits (of value for egoism and hedonism) or personal talents (important for virtue theory and existentialism) can be used well or badly, they cannot constitute moral good. Thus only reason can guide us into proper moral conduct, i.e doing-the-right-thing. Among all moral theories it is probably that of Kant, which has most influenced principle-based theory of bioethics. For Kant the question of a good life is fraught with ambiguity. Do we mean the happiest life which makes it worthy or the worthiest life which makes us happy? In order to answer this Kant says that what matters from a moral point of view is not what we do, but what we intend to do. However he adds that our intentions (will) and actions should be tested in their ability to be applied everywhere by everybody (universalizability). In other words, people do what is right because it is right, regardless to whether it gives them or others pleasure (as it is the case with desires or inclinations). Kant referred to these universal rules as categorical imperatives, which basically state that for pure practical reason one must act in a specific way (taking the previous example): 1. You ought to visit your neighbor in the hospital because you promised. 2. But you don t want to 3. Whether you want or not, you ought to keep your promise (rule of duty). Thus Kant s moral ought transcends desires and wants. We are not asking what will everyone do, but rather what if everyone were to do it? (i.e. lie, steal, cheat etc.). Kant puts his categorical imperative like this: I should never act in such a way that I could not also want that my maxim should be a universal law. But this imperative has a second reading, too: I should never act in such a way that I treat another person like a mere mean or instrument for the ends I pursue. This second reading has a deep and central impact on our professional and bioethical beliefs: everybody agrees now that it is forbidden to instrumentalize a human person, it is a violation of his or her dignity. The main problem however with Kantian law is that the moral emphasis is only on our intention and will to do our duty, without looking at the consequences of our acts. This critique has been classically voiced by the consistent Nazi example, where a Jew was made known to a Nazi soldier on his demand, simply because it is universally wrong to lie. By this example it is clear that moral quality of life cannot be decided purely in terms of intention and will and the consequences of our acts must be taken into account. Utilitarianism or Consequentialism While Kant s conception of best human life is that of moral duty, others criticized this concept as duty for the sake of duty and returned to the importance of giving place to having a happy and fulfilling life. Thus we return to the idea of maximizing happiness and minimizing pain in the world, otherwise known as the greatest happiness principle. This principle, was introduced by Jeremy Bentham and further developed by his successor, John Stuart Mill, who stated that my pleasures and pains are not to be regarded by me as anymore important than yours, when it comes to deciding what is right or wrong for me or anyone else. This of course ensures that utilitarianism is not a selfish doctrine
5 But utilitarianism is niether an altruistic theory. On the contrary, individuals may suffer in the name of utility. In order to avoid unacceptable acts on individuals (for example to kill one to save many others) contemporary utilitarians also introduced the distinction between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism, where the latter assures conduct most conducive to greatest happiness. Thus even in a context of where killing one to save many others would be an act utilitarianism, the rule precludes this because the consequences of a rule permitting the murder of an innocent for the greatest common good, would in fact decrease the greater happiness (nobody will be in security anymore). We see then that utilitarianism has a hedonic aspect to it, but more importantly a consequentialist feature, which puts it in direct opposition to Kant (which gives importance to duty for duty s sake) and to existentialism (which prides in liberty). So utilitarianism is a consequentialist doctrine where only the consequences of actions matter from a moral point of view. Thus in Kant s eyes the acts of Don Quixote (fighting mills) are morally worthy since his intentions (fight evil) are morally worthy, in Sartre s eyes these acts are morally worthy since Don Quixote is true to himself, whereas for the utilitarian, these acts are of no moral value since they are of no consequence. For a utilitarian the end does justify the means, but remains silent on social agreement. So how do we distribute happiness justly? Contractualism In order to answer this we must analyse the different interpretations of social contract. The egoist will try to keep for himself all he needs to fulfill his wants, whereas the altruist will give others all they need at the expense of himself. But those two attitudes are not adequate as a basis for social and political life, where we must distribute the burdens and fruits of cooperation for the benefit of all. Social agreement or contract is the basic tool to gap the bridge between egoistic motivation and altruistic over-obligation. As John Locke, one of the first proponent of the social contract doctrine stated in 17 th century, this agreement should allow individuals to enjoy a life as good as possible and to have maximum freedom as compatible with an equal amount of freedom for all (here is one of the two roots of the doctrine of autonomy and informed consent, the second one residing in the Kantian concept of autonomy). Twentieth century American philosopher John Rawls, who influenced the principle of distributive justice developed a more comprehensive social contract theory in his theory of justice referred as fairness. He put forth two principles of distribution: egality of rights for all and limits on inequalities of wealth and income. Inequalities are morally justified only if they are to the benefit of all and especially to the benefit the least advantaged members of society. These two principles will be chosen by all members of the political community, Rawls contended, if they are put under a veil of ignorance. In other words the principles of justice must be chosen without knowledge of whether the moral agent is male or female, rich or poor, powerful or powerless, abled or disabled. The idea of course is to introduce impartiality into moral deliberations, ensuring fairness and freedom, while limiting as much as possible the gap between the rich and poor. In summary I have tried to show that our professional conduct has been inspired from various moral theories. As our presentation is a conceptual reconstruction, it does not pretend full historical accuracy. Critiques say that medical deontology ( ethical principlism ) is actually ethical fundamentalism and claims with good reason that other theories need to be taken into account (Hans Jonas ethics of responsibility, Carol Gilligan feminist ethics of care, Emmanuel Levinas ethics of alterity, Business ethics). However I postulate that in order to understand the strength and the limits our professional conduct and our approach to solve medical dilemmas, it is better to be aware of it s multiple origins
6 Key learning points: Medical professionalism - A potpourri of moral theories Reasonable objectivism, that states that for many moral questions there is a right answer because for any moral question there might be a right answer, presents the interest in developing a systematic approach to deal with moral dilemmas and not to count upon moral intuition alone. Egoism, different from selfishness, inspires the principle of beneficence (promote good) in emphasizing that one s own desire (e.g. patient) is of moral value and merits to be the centre of a good life. Hedonism, which replaces desires with maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain, reminds us that non-maleficence (do no harm) is an important principle to follow. Virtue theory, stating that a happy virtuous life is the most important value to attain, presents itself as strive to professional excellence as a deontological obligation. The radical freedom expressed in existentialism translates itself into the importance for the professional to accept full responsibility for one s own decision. Kantianism, the greatest inspirer of the respect of autonomy, reminds us not to instrumentalize the other. Both utilitarianism and contractualism have shaped distributive justice and insert fairness within the social agreement. Suggested reading Introduction: Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, 2001 Objectivism vs. Subjectivism Pappas N, Plato and the Republic. London, Routledge, 2003 Egoism Young J, The death of God and the meaning of life. London and New York, Routledge, 2003 Hedonism Gosling JCB. The Greeks on pleasure. Oxford, Clarendon press, 1982 Virtue theory Hughes G, Aristotle on Ethics. London and New York, Routledge, 2001 Existentialism Howells C, The Cambridge Companion to Sartre. Cambridge University Press, 1992 Kantianism Stratton-Lake P, Kant, Duty and Moral worth, London and New York, Routledge, 2000 Utilitarianism Crisp R, Mill on Utilitarianism. London and New York, Routledge, 1997 Contractualism Rawls J, A theory of Justice, Oxford University Press,
EUROANESTHESIA 2007 Munich, Germany, 9-12 June 2007
EUROANESTHESIA 2007 Munich, Germany, 9-12 June 2007 WHERE DO THE PRINCIPLES OF BIOMEDICAL ETHICS COME FROM? 16RC1 ALEX CAHANA Postoperative and Interventional Pain Program, Department Anesthesiology, Pharmacology
More informationMaking Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders
Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? - My boss - The shareholders - Other stakeholders - Basic principles about conduct and its impacts - What is good for me - What
More informationQ2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result.
QUIZ 1 ETHICAL ISSUES IN MEDIA, BUSINESS AND SOCIETY WHAT IS ETHICS? Business ethics deals with values, facts, and arguments. Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be
More informationSUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6
SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6 Textbook: Louis P. Pojman, Editor. Philosophy: The quest for truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 0199697310; ISBN-13: 9780199697311 (6th Edition)
More informationA Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1
310 Book Review Book Review ISSN (Print) 1225-4924, ISSN (Online) 2508-3104 Catholic Theology and Thought, Vol. 79, July 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.21731/ctat.2017.79.310 A Review on What Is This Thing
More informationTake Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #2 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 8-15. Matching and fill-in-the-blank questions
More informationAltruism. A selfless concern for other people purely for their own sake. Altruism is usually contrasted with selfishness or egoism in ethics.
GLOSSARY OF ETHIC TERMS Absolutism. The belief that there is one and only one truth; those who espouse absolutism usually also believe that they know what this absolute truth is. In ethics, absolutism
More information-- did you get a message welcoming you to the cours reflector? If not, please correct what s needed.
1 -- did you get a message welcoming you to the coursemail reflector? If not, please correct what s needed. 2 -- don t use secondary material from the web, as its quality is variable; cf. Wikipedia. Check
More informationA primer of major ethical theories
Chapter 1 A primer of major ethical theories Our topic in this course is privacy. Hence we want to understand (i) what privacy is and also (ii) why we value it and how this value is reflected in our norms
More informationPhilosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology
More informationDEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS In ethical theories, if we mainly focus on the action itself, then we use deontological ethics (also known as deontology or duty ethics). In duty ethics, an action is morally right
More informationPHIL%13:%Ethics;%Fall%2012% David%O.%Brink;%UCSD% Syllabus% Part%I:%Challenges%to%Moral%Theory 1.%Relativism%and%Tolerance.
Draftof8)27)12 PHIL%13:%Ethics;%Fall%2012% David%O.%Brink;%UCSD% Syllabus% Hereisalistoftopicsandreadings.Withinatopic,dothereadingsintheorderinwhich theyarelisted.readingsaredrawnfromthethreemaintexts
More informationChallenges to Traditional Morality
Challenges to Traditional Morality Altruism Behavior that benefits others at some cost to oneself and that is motivated by the desire to benefit others Some Ordinary Assumptions About Morality (1) People
More informationLecture Notes Rosalind Hursthouse, Normative Virtue Ethics (1996, 2013) Keith Burgess-Jackson 4 May 2016
Lecture Notes Rosalind Hursthouse, Normative Virtue Ethics (1996, 2013) Keith Burgess-Jackson 4 May 2016 0. Introduction. Hursthouse s aim in this essay is to defend virtue ethics against the following
More informationMGT610 Business Ethics
MIDTERM EXAMINATION MGT610 Business Ethics BY VIRTUALIANS.PK Question # 01 Mark: 1 The three major types of ethical issues include except? Communication issues Systematic issues Corporate issues Individual
More informationLecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. What answer (A E) do you think will have been selected most frequently in the previous poll? Recap: Unworkable
More informationMill s Utilitarian Theory
Normative Ethics Mill s Utilitarian Theory John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism The Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they
More informationChapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics
Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;
More informationDefinitions: Values and Moral Values
Definitions: Values and Moral Values 1. Values those things that we care about; those things that matter to us; those goals or ideals to which we aspire and by which we measure ourselves and others in
More informationMoral Theory. What makes things right or wrong?
Moral Theory What makes things right or wrong? Consider: Moral Disagreement We have disagreements about right and wrong, about how people ought or ought not act. When we do, we (sometimes!) reason with
More informationLecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics
Lecture 12 Deontology Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics 1 Agenda 1. Immanuel Kant 2. Deontology 3. Hypothetical vs. Categorical Imperatives 4. Formula of the End in Itself 5. Maxims and
More informationMoral Philosophy : Utilitarianism
Moral Philosophy : Utilitarianism Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a moral theory that was developed by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). It is a teleological or consequentialist
More informationSuppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions
Suppose.... Kant You are a good swimmer and one day at the beach you notice someone who is drowning offshore. Consider the following three scenarios. Which one would Kant says exhibits a good will? Even
More informationKant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals
Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into
More informationLecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. (thanks to Rodrigo for suggesting this quiz) Ethical Egoism Achievement of your happiness is the only moral
More informationThe Pleasure Imperative
The Pleasure Imperative Utilitarianism, particularly the version espoused by John Stuart Mill, is probably the best known consequentialist normative ethical theory. Furthermore, it is probably the most
More informationChapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics
Chapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. Consequentialism a. is best represented by Ross's theory of ethics. b. states that sometimes the consequences of our actions can be morally relevant.
More informationEvaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule
UTILITARIAN ETHICS Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule A dilemma You are a lawyer. You have a client who is an old lady who owns a big house. She tells you that
More informationChapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System
Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Ethics and Morality Ethics: greek ethos, study of morality What is Morality? Morality: system of rules for guiding
More informationfactors in Bentham's hedonic calculus.
Answers to quiz 1. An autonomous person: a) is socially isolated from other people. b) directs his or her actions on the basis his or own basic values, beliefs, etc. c) is able to get by without the help
More informationSocratic and Platonic Ethics
Socratic and Platonic Ethics G. J. Mattey Winter, 2017 / Philosophy 1 Ethics and Political Philosophy The first part of the course is a brief survey of important texts in the history of ethics and political
More informationChapter 2: Reasoning about ethics
Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics 2012 Cengage Learning All Rights reserved Learning Outcomes LO 1 Explain how important moral reasoning is and how to apply it. LO 2 Explain the difference between facts
More informationGS SCORE ETHICS - A - Z. Notes
ETHICS - A - Z Absolutism Act-utilitarianism Agent-centred consideration Agent-neutral considerations : This is the view, with regard to a moral principle or claim, that it holds everywhere and is never
More informationCritical Reasoning and Moral theory day 3
Critical Reasoning and Moral theory day 3 CS 340 Fall 2015 Ethics and Moral Theories Differences of opinion based caused by different value set Deontology Virtue Religious and Divine Command Utilitarian
More informationComputer Ethics. Normative Ethics Ethical Theories. Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018
Normative Ethics Ethical Theories Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018 Overview (van de Poel and Royakkers 2011) 2 Ethical theories Relativism and absolutism Consequentialist approaches: utilitarianism
More informationIntroduction to Ethics
Question 1: What is act-utilitarianism? Answer 1: Act-utilitarianism is a theory that is commonly presented in the writings of Jeremy Bentham and looks at the consequences of a specific act in determining
More informationChapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:
Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS MGT604 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After exploring this chapter, you will be able to: 1. Explain the ethical framework of utilitarianism. 2. Describe how utilitarian
More informationThe view that all of our actions are done in self-interest is called psychological egoism.
Egoism For the last two classes, we have been discussing the question of whether any actions are really objectively right or wrong, independently of the standards of any person or group, and whether any
More informationUtilitarianism pp
Utilitarianism pp. 430-445. Assuming that moral realism is true and that there are objectively true moral principles, what are they? What, for example, is the correct principle concerning lying? Three
More informationCHAPTER 2 Test Bank MULTIPLE CHOICE
CHAPTER 2 Test Bank MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. A structured set of principles that defines what is moral is referred to as: a. a norm system b. an ethical system c. a morality guide d. a principled guide ANS:
More informationKant's Moral Philosophy
Kant's Moral Philosophy I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (178.5)- Immanuel Kant A. Aims I. '7o seek out and establish the supreme principle of morality." a. To provide a rational basis for morality.
More informationDeontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT
Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT KANT S OBJECTIONS TO UTILITARIANISM: 1. Utilitarianism takes no account of integrity - the accidental act or one done with evil intent if promoting good ends
More information24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. Three Moral Theories
More informationPhilosophical Ethics. Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics)
Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics) Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics) Consequentialism the value of an action (the action's moral worth, its rightness or wrongness) derives entirely from
More informationWednesday, April 20, 16. Introduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy In your notebooks answer the following questions: 1. Why am I here? (in terms of being in this course) 2. Why am I here? (in terms of existence) 3. Explain what the unexamined
More informationTuesday, September 2, Idealism
Idealism Enlightenment Puzzle How do these fit into a scientific picture of the world? Norms Necessity Universality Mind Idealism The dominant 19th-century response: often today called anti-realism Everything
More informationUndergraduate Calendar Content
PHILOSOPHY Note: See beginning of Section H for abbreviations, course numbers and coding. Introductory and Intermediate Level Courses These 1000 and 2000 level courses have no prerequisites, and except
More informationPhilosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.
Philosophical Ethics The nature of ethical analysis Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2. How to resolve ethical issues? censorship abortion affirmative action How do we defend our moral
More informationPlato s Republic Book 3&4. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Plato s Republic Book 3&4 Instructor: Jason Sheley What do we want out of a theory of Justice, anyway? The Trolley Problem The trolley problem: A trolley is running out of control down a track. In its
More informationDo you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014
Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationNORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY DHAKA, BANGLADESH
NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY DHAKA, BANGLADESH Semester: Spring 2016 Course Code: PHI 104 (Section: 2) Class Time: ST 04.20 PM-05.50 PM Course Title: Introduction to Ethics
More informationDeontological Ethics
Deontological Ethics From Jane Eyre, the end of Chapter XXVII: (Mr. Rochester is the first speaker) And what a distortion in your judgment, what a perversity in your ideas, is proved by your conduct! Is
More information24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy
Mill s Utilitarianism I. Introduction Recall that there are four questions one might ask an ethical theory to answer: a) Which acts are right and which are wrong? Which acts ought we to perform (understanding
More informationCourse Syllabus Ethics PHIL 330, Fall, 2009
Instructor: Dr. Matt Zwolinski Office Hours: MW: 12:00-2:00; F: 11:15-12:15 Office: F167A Course Website: http://pope.sandiego.edu/ Phone: 619-260-4094 Email: mzwolinski@sandiego.edu Course Syllabus Ethics
More informationThinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making
Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making Developed by Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer Moral issues greet us each morning in the newspaper, confront
More informationAnnotated List of Ethical Theories
Annotated List of Ethical Theories The following list is selective, including only what I view as the major theories. Entries in bold face have been especially influential. Recommendations for additions
More informationChapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363)
Chapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363) Moral reasoning (p. 364) Value-judgements Some people argue that moral values are just reflections of personal taste. For example, I don t like spinach is
More informationKANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)
KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an opponent of utilitarianism. Basic Summary: Kant, unlike Mill, believed that certain types of actions (including murder,
More informationCS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics
CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics Sources: Baase: A Gift of Fire and Quinn: Ethics for the Information Age CS305-Spring 2010 Ethics 1 What is Ethics? A branch of philosophy that studies priciples relating
More informationTeleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?
1. Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 2. Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationBasics of Ethics CS 215 Denbigh Starkey
Basics of Ethics CS 215 Denbigh Starkey 1. Introduction 1 2. Morality vs. ethics 1 3. Some ethical theories 3 a. Subjective relativism 3 b. Cultural relativism 3 c. Divine command theory 3 d. The golden
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus Class 26 - April 27 Kantian Ethics Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 Mill s Defense of Utilitarianism P People desire happiness.
More informationConsequentialism. Mill s Theory of Utility
Consequentialism Mill s Theory of Utility Consequentialism Theory of Normative Ethics Has a different way of determining what the good life is from Aristotle: J.S. MILL: Good -----> THEORY OF CONSEQUENTIALISM
More informationNotes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning
Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning The final chapter of Moore and Parker s text is devoted to how we might apply critical reasoning in certain philosophical contexts.
More information#NLCU. The Ethical Leader: Rules and Tools
The Ethical Leader: Rules and Tools #NLCU March 12, 2017 Washington, DC Dr. Scott Paine Director, Leadership Development and Education Florida League of Cities Agenda So What is Ethics? Sample Ethical
More informationChapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior
Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. A structured set of principles that defines what is moral is referred to as: a. a norm system b. an ethical system c. a morality guide d. a principled
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus Class 28 -Kantian Ethics Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 The Good Will P It is impossible to conceive anything at all in
More informationKant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons
Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons Some Possibly Helpful Terminology Normative moral theories can be categorized according to whether the theory is primarily focused on judgments of value or judgments
More informationEthical Analysis: PRINCIPLISM. Patrick T. Smith, Ph.D.
Ethical Analysis: PRINCIPLISM Patrick T. Smith, Ph.D. Lecturer, Department of Global Health & Social Medicine Core Faculty, Harvard Center for Bioethics The Case of Dolores Some Ethical Questions What
More informationETHICAL THEORIES. Review week 6 session 11. Ethics Ethical Theories Review. Socrates. Socrate s theory of virtue. Socrate s chain of injustices
Socrates ETHICAL THEORIES Review week 6 session 11 Greece (470 to 400 bc) Was Plato s teacher Didn t write anything Died accused of corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods of the city Creator
More informationKant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes. Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2.
Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2 Kant s analysis of the good differs in scope from Aristotle s in two ways. In
More informationPH 101: Problems of Philosophy. Section 005, Monday & Thursday 11:00 a.m. - 12:20 p.m. Course Description:
PH 101: Problems of Philosophy INSTRUCTOR: Stephen Campbell Section 005, Monday & Thursday 11:00 a.m. - 12:20 p.m. Course Description: This course seeks to help students develop their capacity to think
More informationCLIMBING THE MOUNTAIN SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 REASONS. 1 Practical Reasons
CLIMBING THE MOUNTAIN SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 REASONS 1 Practical Reasons We are the animals that can understand and respond to reasons. Facts give us reasons when they count in favour of our having some belief
More informationClass 23 - April 20 Plato, What is Right Conduct?
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus I. Nihilism, Relativism, and Absolutism Class 23 - April 20 Plato, What is Right Conduct? One question which arises
More informationSPS103 LAW AND ETHICS
SPS103 LAW AND ETHICS Full Course Title: Law and Ethics Pravo i etika Course Code: Course Level/BiH cycle: SPS103 I cycle; 1 st year ECTS credit value: 6 Student work-load: For the whole semester: Lectures
More informationDepartment of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules
Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 2017/18 Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,
More informationQuote. Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas. Chapter Two. Determining Moral Behavior. Integrity is doing the right thing--even if nobody is watching
Chapter Two Determining Moral Behavior Quote Integrity is doing the right thing--even if nobody is watching - Unknown Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas 1 - Identify the facts 2 Identify relevant values and concepts
More informationA. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics. 2. Normative Ethics
A. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics 1. Meta-ethics 2. Normative Ethics 3. Applied Ethics 1 B. Meta-ethics consists in the attempt to answer the fundamental philosophical questions
More informationThe form of relativism that says that whether an agent s actions are right or wrong depends on the moral principles accepted in her own society.
Glossary of Terms: Act-consequentialism Actual Duty Actual Value Agency Condition Agent Relativism Amoralist Appraisal Relativism A form of direct consequentialism according to which the rightness and
More informationSummary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
Summary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Version 1.1 Richard Baron 2 October 2016 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Availability and licence............ 3 2 Definitions of key terms 4 3
More informationIntroduction to Ethics
Introduction to Ethics Auburn University Department of Philosophy PHIL 1020 Fall Semester, 2015 Syllabus Instructor: Email: Version 1.0. The schedule of readings is subject to revision. Students are responsible
More informationIs euthanasia morally permissible? What is the relationship between patient autonomy,
Course Syllabus PHILOSOPHY 433 Instructor: Doran Smolkin, Ph. D. doran.smolkin@kpu.ca or doran.smolkin@ubc.ca Course Description: Is euthanasia morally permissible? What is the relationship between patient
More informationEthical Reasoning and the THSEB: A Primer for Coaches
Ethical Reasoning and the THSEB: A Primer for Coaches THSEB@utk.edu philosophy.utk.edu/ethics/index.php FOLLOW US! Twitter: @thseb_utk Instagram: thseb_utk Facebook: facebook.com/thsebutk Co-sponsored
More informationDEONTOLOGY AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY
Current Ethical Debates UNIT 2 DEONTOLOGY AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Contents 2.0 Objectives 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Good Will 2.3 Categorical Imperative 2.4 Freedom as One of the Three Postulates 2.5 Human
More information1 Hans Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), 1-10.
Introduction This book seeks to provide a metaethical analysis of the responsibility ethics of two of its prominent defenders: H. Richard Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas. In any ethical writings, some use
More informationA Cross-Cultural Approach to Questions of Ethics in Radiation Protection. Friedo Zölzer University of South Bohemia, Czech Republic
A Cross-Cultural Approach to Questions of Ethics in Radiation Protection Friedo Zölzer University of South Bohemia, Czech Republic The moral philosophy underlying the recommendations of the International
More informationLecture 8. Ethics in Science
Lecture 8 Ethics in Science What is ethics? We can say it is a system for guiding our choices in different situations But it is not just rational choices. It is about situations where our conceptions of
More informationEthical Theory for Catholic Professionals
The Linacre Quarterly Volume 53 Number 1 Article 9 February 1986 Ethical Theory for Catholic Professionals James F. Drane Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended
More informationBOOK REVIEW: CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS
BOOK REVIEW: CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS Book Contemporary Moral Problems Chapter 1: James Rachels: Egoism and Moral skepticism 1. To know what Egoism and Moral Skepticism is 2. To understand and differentiate
More informationDeontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT
Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT A NOTE ON READING KANT Lord Macaulay once recorded in his diary a memorable attempt his first and apparently his last to read Kant s Critique: I received today
More information(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.
Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality?
More informationEthics (ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus
(ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus Required Items: Ethical Theory: An Anthology 5 th ed. Russ Shafer-Landau. Wiley-Blackwell. 2013 The Fundamentals of 2 nd ed. Russ Shafer-Landau. Oxford University Press.
More informationNormative Ethical Theories
Normative Ethical Theories I. Normative Ethics A Normative Ethical Theory is a philosophical theory about the fundamental principles of morality. A fundamental principle of morality is a moral obligation
More informationFoundations of Bioethics
introductory lectures in bioethics Foundations of Bioethics Paul Menzel Pacific Lutheran University (philosophy, emeritus) Visiting Professor of Bioethics, CUHK 17 October 2015 Centre for Bioethics, CUHK
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 13 March 22 nd, 2016 O Neill, A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics So far in this unit, we ve seen many different ways of judging right/wrong actions: Aristotle s virtue
More informationPhilosophy 2: Introduction to Ethics. Instructor: Erick Ramirez. Office location: Kenna 207
Philosophy 2: Introduction to Ethics inter 2013 Instructor: Erick Ramirez : 9:15-10:20 Office Hours: 2:10-4 pm E-mail: ejramirez@scu.edu Office location: Kenna 207 Course Description Ethics is the branch
More informationBenjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy
Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy Kantian Ethics I. Context II. The Good Will III. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation of Universal Law IV. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation
More informationUnits. Year 1 Unit 1: Course Overview. 1:1 - Getting Started 1:2 - Introducing Philosophy SL 1:3 - Assessment and Tools
Philosophy SL Units All Pamoja courses are written by experienced subject matter experts and integrate the principles of TOK and the approaches to learning of the IB learner profile. This course has been
More informationMoral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View
Chapter 98 Moral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View Lars Leeten Universität Hildesheim Practical thinking is a tricky business. Its aim will never be fulfilled unless influence on practical
More informationLYING TEACHER S NOTES
TEACHER S NOTES INTRO Each student has to choose one of the following topics. The other students have to ask questions on that topic. During the discussion, the student has to lie once. The other students
More information