VIEWING PERSPECTIVES
|
|
- Olivia Arnold
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 VIEWING PERSPECTIVES j. walter Viewing Perspectives - Page 1 of 6 In acting on the basis of values, people demonstrate points-of-view, or basic attitudes, about their own actions as well as the actions of other people. We call these points-of-view Perspectives. In using this term, we make a choice of definitions for the word "perspective." For instance, with another definition, perspective is an concept applied to painting that evokes vanishing-points and illusionism. To avoid confusion, we use the term Perspective to describe one of three possible points-of-view: (1) ethnocentrism, (2) relativism, and (3) tolerance. TWO PRINCIPLES FOR ANALYZING PERSPECTIVES The Attitude-about-the-Other Principle. Perspectives always involve a person's response to some "other." They provide modes for people to "look out" to the world around them. Encounters with others may lead people to act out (show the value of) their Perspectives. The basic attitudes that people hold (their Perspectives) give rise to actions (values) that display those attitudes. The Situational Principle. Just like values, Perspectives result from people's actions more than their thoughts. People tend to see themselves as holding the same perspective in every situation. This is not so, but it seems to provide a comfortable self-image. However, cultures and individuals usually have a dominant perspective that guides the way they want to respond to situations. People actually act out all three Perspectives, depending on their responses to a situation. This is normal. And even healthy! THREE PERSPECTIVES Ethnocentric Perspective. Ethnocentrism is the perspective that one's own values are true for everybody. It is grounded in the notion that one's own way of doing or looking at things is the only logical, rational way. A phrase that captures the essence of ethnocentrism is: what is true for me must be true for you. Associated terms are: close-mindedness, prejudice, bigotry, and authoritarianism. Ethnocentrism makes a basic judgment about the "other" others are wrong if they are different. Ethnocentric judgments make no critical appraisal of evidence or facts. If my way of doing or looking at things is the only logical or correct way, there is no need or desire to examine alternatives. We act in an ethnocentric fashion whenever we try to get others to conform to our standards without seriously considering alternatives, whenever we close our mind to other points-of-view, or whenever we think or act against others without evidence sufficient to justify the thought or action.
2 To some extent we are all ethnocentric. We must recognize that whenever we desire others to conform to our standards, and this desire is combined with the refusal to consider alternatives, we are ethnocentric. But our ethnocentrism often poses no particular dangers and may even be the "best" perspective to hold. Think about parents raising their young children, for instance. Still, whenever we find ourselves acting in an ethnocentric fashion, we need to ask, Are our actions truly representing the best possibility? (Think again about parents raising their young children.) When we decide the answer is "NO," then most of us usually turn to a... Relativistic Perspective. Relativism is the perspective that values are true or good only in certain cultural or social settings. For a relativist, nothing is true for everybody all the time. A phrase that captures the essence of relativism is: what is true for me may or may not be true for you. Other phrases are: live and let live; see no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil; and I'm ok, you're ok. The term most commonly associated with relativism is openmindedness, usually understood in the sense of "non-judgmental." This association is so strong that a refusal to make judgments is often mistaken for freedom from unjust prejudice that s not quite right, as we ll learn through the study of Perspectives (maybe you can already see the problem?). Much is often said in praise of Relativism. The three most commonly stated reasons for its popularity are: (1) As we know, real values are dependent on specific cultural settings. That means that any claim that there are "universal" values must take into account every human point-of-view that s ever been expressed, and that just can t be done at least, not yet. So we have to be relative in our perspective about values there s just no other choice. (2) Relativism seems to involve respect for diversity among human individuals and groups, which provides some antidote to Ethnocentrism and unjust prejudice without requiring individuals to reconsider their own values. Multiculturalism is a term that expresses this idea. (3) Relativism provides a scientific (impersonal, objective, functional) framework for moral reasoning because it replaces assumptions or generalizations about what is valuable with the affirmation that values simply reflect the interests of particular individuals or societies and therefore are open to straightforward empirical investigation. All you have to do is note the variables and conditions that is, all you have to do is note the limitations on whatever sense of truth you might find.
3 j. walter Viewing Perspectives - Page 3 of 6 In many situations Relativism is the most practical perspective, either because it helps one avoid Ethnocentrism or because there is no realistic way (or reason) to try to achieve Tolerance, the third Perspective (see below). Still, here are two question areas about the value of relativism: The term most closely associated with relativism is openmindedness. Is open-mindedness a good thing? Open- Mindedness is a synonym for Non-Judgmental. Some doubt that open-mindedness, or being non-judgmental, is even possible, in a literal sense. Why? Because it can t really happen with humans! Whenever we experience something new we have to use old categories, in our mind, to make sense of it that is, we have to use prejudicing minds closed by our own categories, built by our own experiences. We just can t handle open-mindedness, taking each new event freshly in its own right. The philosopher Bertrand Russell sums it up with the phrase, a mind perpetually open will be a mind perpetually vacant. For example, if we accept alternative lifestyles, or alternative cultures, will we accept child molesters? Let's start by saying NO to accepting child molesters. Well, when someone walks up and asks, why not? what do we answer? Remember our position as relativists: values are simply the product of particular situations. This is a matter of common knowledge unjust prejudice is dangerous and we need to strive for freedom from prejudice (that s how it s said in our culture, anyhow). Can a non-judgmental Perspective lead to genuine freedom from prejudice? If Relativism is most commonly expressed as a rejection of critical judgment, defended on the grounds that there is no support for making such judgments (I m okay, You re okay), then the issue becomes whether the refusal to make judgments is equivalent to a lack of unjust prejudice or is it simply the attitude of those who don t want to support their beliefs? Put another way (1) Freedom from prejudice depends on not making critical judgments about others (so relativism seems to work), but (2) we all have limits to what we find acceptable from others (so we need something other than relativism to set the limits), hence (3) isn t it the case that the limits we set on what is acceptable are necessarily based on ethnocentrism? As it turns out, relativism provides weak medicine against prejudice - or maybe no medicine at all! (Do you find the triumph of relativism ironic in an educational climate in which "critical thinking" is one of the most positive buzzwords?)
4 Tolerant Perspective. Tolerance is the Perspective grounded in the belief that there are universal standards for human behavior; however, there is no way to describe the standards with precision or confidence. You really should pause and think about this for a moment! These are the twin pillars of the perspective of tolerance universal standards with no universal way to understand or communicate them! j. walter Viewing Perspectives - Page 4 of 6 The phrase that captures the essence of tolerance is: what is true for everyone must be true for me. It's easy to misunderstand this phrase. IT DOES NOT MEAN going along with the crowd. The term most closely associated with tolerance is inclusiveness, but again, one must beware of misunderstanding the concept. Tolerance never means accepting other beliefs and values simply because they belong to someone else. Tolerance is trying to enlarge one's own view by examining other beliefs and values, and making critical judgments about them. From its foundational assumption about standards that are unknown, the Perspective of Tolerance goes on to ask a question: what is the acceptable amount of variation from these standards? This question provides the key to linking the idea of tolerance (as a Perspective) to the many definitions of "tolerance" in the dictionary. "Variation from a standard" is an important meaning for the word "tolerance." Now you might be thinking it's really crazy to ask about the amount of legitimate variation from standards that you can't even define! If you do entertain this thought, you have hit on both the appeal and the difficulty of the idea of tolerance. The concept of tolerance comes to us from Europe in the sixteenth through eighteenth centuries. (They called it "toleration" back then.) Those were exciting times for European intellectuals, as discoveries of distant lands and unimagined peoples challenged any easy assumptions about human nature and universal standards for it. Yet they retained the faith that human beings do have important values in common and that the universal standards of behavior can be known with enough investigation. This is may be the best way to understand tolerance -- a matter of faith that we ll find the standards. It's a quest; a journey related to the Latin roots of the word tolera/tio, that is a quality of consistent and patient endurance. The Perspective of TOLERANCE is a patient quest, or an enduring search, for universal standards of human behavior (remember, actions are values), the acceptable degrees of variation from those standards/values, and the successful ways to communicate those standards/values. Don Quixote dreaming the impossible dream
5 j. walter Viewing Perspectives - Page 5 of 6 To engage in this quest, you must accept some unavoidable consequences of your journey 1. The quest is an ongoing investigation of how things are, NOT an ongoing assumption about how things ought to be. Therefore, the ultimate goal of the quest to identify the standards of behavior that apply to all human beings, any time, any place is unreachable. One must settle for intermediate goals. In order to hold a perspective of tolerance, people have to practice tolerance (that is, act in a tolerant manner). 2. Acting in a tolerant manner means something special. Tolerance attempts to use reason to evaluate the merits of all values, actions, and beliefs. It attempts to establish "rules of reason" that may be used to form arguments and verify judgments. Having conversations with others is one of the rules, and having conversations takes time. So, acting with toleration means taking time to have conversations. 3. It probably will turn out, as it has most often thus far, that only individuals can practice tolerance. Cultures and countries can be ethnocentric, or they can be relativistic, but they are very hard pressed to be tolerant. Tolerance is the most personal of the three Perspectives. It does NOT involve reaching a conclusion. It has to do with making a journey. Groups and countries want conclusions. They want to have stances. Being tolerant means abandoning the idea and ideal of reaching a final point-ofview. Being tolerant means becoming involved in a process of potential change, with no ending-point and no destination in mind. (pretty scary, right?) MORE ON THE CHALLENGE OF PRACTICING TOLERANCE The practice of tolerance begins with meaningful communication between individuals. The failure to achieve meaningful communication generally rests on the inability of the persons involved to respect and trust each other. True dialogue only happens when the interlocutors share a willingness to respect each other and to share deep and controversial ideas without an attempt to minimize disagreements. If Tolerance is formed around exchanging points-of-view with the "other," it is more than exposing the differences and parting as friends. Critical judgment plays the crucial role. The starting-point of tolerance is to consider more than one point-of-view. Like Ethnocentrism, Tolerance makes judgments about the "other." The difference is that Ethnocentrism makes judgments based solely on the point-of-view of the ethnocentric person. Tolerance, on the other hand, bases its judgments on a rational consideration of all available evidence. Tolerance knows that its judgments are provisional, because all the evidence is not in. Ethnocentrism knows that its judgments are right, because they represent the only "logical" way of thinking. Tolerance uses reasoned inquiry and critical thinking to question all judgments, especially its own.
6 j. walter Viewing Perspectives - Page 6 of 6 Accepting other beliefs and values as valid for the "other" simply because they belong to the "other" is Relativism. Tolerance may accept or reject the "other," but only after a rational analysis of the "other." Tolerance is trying to enlarge one's own view by examining alternative views and making critical judgments about them. To be tolerant, people have to be willing to change if they encounter data that shows them they need to change. They also have to be willing to defend and promote their own views toward tolerantly convincing the other. We should probably refuse to make naive claims about "universal" values, but we can practice tolerance by trying to enlarge our own views about universal standards through honest, empathetic, and compassionate dialog with people who hold different views. That kind of dialogue cannot occur between strangers, or enemies. It must take place between people who have established some positive personal relationship. It must take place between friends. Because such dialogue focuses on an exploration of differences, it may be painful, and it is often avoided. Both Tolerance and Relativism imply respect for alternate viewpoints. The difference is that Tolerance requires us to ask if the beliefs and values of others might be useful in our own lives. We hear the word tolerance used all the time in our everyday, commonplace experience. But that use of the word tolerance is really a synonym for "relativism." In this we encounter a final, widespread, VERY problematic misunderstanding. How often have you heard someone say, I can tolerate that, or I have a lot of tolerance, or You should be more tolerant, or I am a very tolerant person. In all these phrases the term "tolerance" is used as a quasi-substitute for Relativism, that is, for a Perspective that avoids Ethnocentrism by assuming a non-judgmental position. DO YOU SEE THE IRONY IN THIS? Nowadays, many people have a high degree of respect for the word tolerance while at the same time rejecting true tolerance as a legitimate goal or Perspective of choice. They make tolerance into, at best, some expression of an ideal value, while refusing to enact it as a REAL value! ETHNOCENTRISM - RELATIVISM - TOLERANCE HOW DO YOU SEE IT? HOW DO YOU VIEW THE OTHER? WHAT IS YOUR PERSPECTIVE?
The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind
criticalthinking.org http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-critical-mind-is-a-questioning-mind/481 The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind Learning How to Ask Powerful, Probing Questions Introduction
More information24.00: Problems of Philosophy Prof. Sally Haslanger November 16, 2005 Moral Relativism
24.00: Problems of Philosophy Prof. Sally Haslanger November 16, 2005 Moral Relativism 1. Introduction Here are four questions (of course there are others) we might want an ethical theory to answer for
More informationIntroduction. 1 Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, n.d.), 7.
Those who have consciously passed through the field of philosophy would readily remember the popular saying to beginners in this discipline: philosophy begins with the act of wondering. To wonder is, first
More informationMORAL RELATIVISM. A. What is it for something to be relative to something else? 1. Many things are relative to one thing or another.
MORAL RELATIVISM A. What is it for something to be relative to something else? 1. Many things are relative to one thing or another. Examples: a) Tallness is relative. What it means to be a tall skyscraper
More informationMORAL RELATIVISM. A. What is it for something to be relative to something else? 1. Many things are relative to one thing or another.
MORAL RELATIVISM A. What is it for something to be relative to something else? 1. Many things are relative to one thing or another. Examples: a) Tallness is relative. What it means to be a tall skyscraper
More informationHow to Write a Philosophy Paper
How to Write a Philosophy Paper The goal of a philosophy paper is simple: make a compelling argument. This guide aims to teach you how to write philosophy papers, starting from the ground up. To do that,
More informationEXAM PREP (Semester 2: 2018) Jules Khomo. Linguistic analysis is concerned with the following question:
PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE ARE MY PERSONAL EXAM PREP NOTES. ANSWERS ARE TAKEN FROM LECTURER MEMO S, STUDENT ANSWERS, DROP BOX, MY OWN, ETC. THIS DOCUMENT CAN NOT BE SOLD FOR PROFIT AS IT IS BEING SHARED AT
More informationHANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13
1 HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Argument Recognition 2 II. Argument Analysis 3 1. Identify Important Ideas 3 2. Identify Argumentative Role of These Ideas 4 3. Identify Inferences 5 4. Reconstruct the
More informationResponse to The Doctrine of Humanity by Charles Sherlock. Joseph Moreland
Response to The Doctrine of Humanity by Charles Sherlock by Joseph Moreland Our culture affects the way we live our lives. It is like the air we breathe. When we breathe, we do not think about breathing.
More informationRelativism and Subjectivism. The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards
Relativism and Subjectivism The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards Starting with a counter argument 1.The universe operates according to laws 2.The universe can be investigated through the use of both
More informationTHEOLOGY IN THE FLESH
1 Introduction One might wonder what difference it makes whether we think of divine transcendence as God above us or as God ahead of us. It matters because we use these simple words to construct deep theological
More informationEach copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
The Physical World Author(s): Barry Stroud Source: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 87 (1986-1987), pp. 263-277 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Aristotelian
More informationWhy Open-mindedness Matters
Why Open-mindedness Matters William Hare Mount Saint Vincent University Open-mindedness involves a readiness to give due consideration to relevant evidence and argument, especially when factors present
More informationFaults and Mathematical Disagreement
45 Faults and Mathematical Disagreement María Ponte ILCLI. University of the Basque Country mariaponteazca@gmail.com Abstract: My aim in this paper is to analyse the notion of mathematical disagreements
More informationHas Nagel uncovered a form of idealism?
Has Nagel uncovered a form of idealism? Author: Terence Rajivan Edward, University of Manchester. Abstract. In the sixth chapter of The View from Nowhere, Thomas Nagel attempts to identify a form of idealism.
More information2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1
Chapter 1 What Is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life CHAPTER SUMMARY Philosophy is a way of thinking that allows one to think more deeply about one s beliefs and about meaning in life. It
More informationHANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)
1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by
More information(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.
Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality?
More informationPresuppositional Apologetics
by John M. Frame [, for IVP Dictionary of Apologetics.] 1. Presupposing God in Apologetic Argument Presuppositional apologetics may be understood in the light of a distinction common in epistemology, or
More informationComments on Lasersohn
Comments on Lasersohn John MacFarlane September 29, 2006 I ll begin by saying a bit about Lasersohn s framework for relativist semantics and how it compares to the one I ve been recommending. I ll focus
More informationHANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)
1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by
More informationArgumentation and Positioning: Empirical insights and arguments for argumentation analysis
Argumentation and Positioning: Empirical insights and arguments for argumentation analysis Luke Joseph Buhagiar & Gordon Sammut University of Malta luke.buhagiar@um.edu.mt Abstract Argumentation refers
More informationThe Power of Critical Thinking Why it matters How it works
Page 1 of 60 The Power of Critical Thinking Chapter Objectives Understand the definition of critical thinking and the importance of the definition terms systematic, evaluation, formulation, and rational
More informationBIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH. September 29m 2016
BIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH September 29m 2016 REFLECTIONS OF GOD IN SCIENCE God s wisdom is displayed in the marvelously contrived design of the universe and its parts. God s omnipotence
More informationReview of Science and Ethics. Bernard Rollin Cambridge University Press pp., paper
92 Between the Species Review of Science and Ethics Bernard Rollin Cambridge University Press 2006 306 pp., paper Walters State Community College greg.bock@ws.edu Volume 18, Issue 1 Aug 2015 93 Bernard
More informationSelf-Refuting Statements
Self-Refuting Statements 2016 M. S. Turner Often when Christians are sharing their faith, they are challenged by skeptics, agnostics, and non-believers with statements that are selfrefuting. A self-refuting
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationYouth Ministry Training Lesson Sixteen: Youth Ministry Shepherding Offering Direction. Lesson Introduction
Youth Ministry Training Lesson Sixteen: Youth Ministry Shepherding Offering Direction Lesson Introduction Session Overview Discovering and Practicing Wisdom with Youth Challenging Youth through Spiritual
More informationHenrik Ahlenius Department of Philosophy ETHICS & RESEARCH
Henrik Ahlenius Department of Philosophy henrik.ahlenius@philosophy.su.se ETHICS & RESEARCH Why a course like this? Tell you what the rules are Tell you to follow these rules Tell you to follow some other
More informationMcCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism
48 McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism T om R egan In his book, Meta-Ethics and Normative Ethics,* Professor H. J. McCloskey sets forth an argument which he thinks shows that we know,
More informationHOW TO BE (AND HOW NOT TO BE) A NORMATIVE REALIST:
1 HOW TO BE (AND HOW NOT TO BE) A NORMATIVE REALIST: A DISSERTATION OVERVIEW THAT ASSUMES AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE ABOUT MY READER S PHILOSOPHICAL BACKGROUND Consider the question, What am I going to have
More informationAyer and Quine on the a priori
Ayer and Quine on the a priori November 23, 2004 1 The problem of a priori knowledge Ayer s book is a defense of a thoroughgoing empiricism, not only about what is required for a belief to be justified
More informationWHY IS GOD GOOD? EUTYPHRO, TIMAEUS AND THE DIVINE COMMAND THEORY
Miłosz Pawłowski WHY IS GOD GOOD? EUTYPHRO, TIMAEUS AND THE DIVINE COMMAND THEORY In Eutyphro Plato presents a dilemma 1. Is it that acts are good because God wants them to be performed 2? Or are they
More informationEthical Theory for Catholic Professionals
The Linacre Quarterly Volume 53 Number 1 Article 9 February 1986 Ethical Theory for Catholic Professionals James F. Drane Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended
More informationTwo Approaches to Natural Law;Note
Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Natural Law Forum 1-1-1956 Two Approaches to Natural Law;Note Vernon J. Bourke Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_naturallaw_forum
More informationTwo Kinds of Moral Relativism
p. 1 Two Kinds of Moral Relativism JOHN J. TILLEY INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS jtilley@iupui.edu [Final draft of a paper that appeared in the Journal of Value Inquiry 29(2) (1995):
More informationPhil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?
Phil 1103 Review Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science? 1. Copernican Revolution Students should be familiar with the basic historical facts of the Copernican revolution.
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationAdam Smith and the Limits of Empiricism
Adam Smith and the Limits of Empiricism In the debate between rationalism and sentimentalism, one of the strongest weapons in the rationalist arsenal is the notion that some of our actions ought to be
More informationShould We Assess the Basic Premises of an Argument for Truth or Acceptability?
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 2 May 15th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM Should We Assess the Basic Premises of an Argument for Truth or Acceptability? Derek Allen
More informationThe Gospel Story: Overcome Evil with Good Romans 12:9-21 Pastor Bryan Clark
March 16/17, 2013 The Gospel Story: Overcome Evil with Good Romans 12:9-21 Pastor Bryan Clark I doubt too many people would argue with the statement, There is evil in the world. Probably where we would
More informationAyer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More information1/8. Introduction to Kant: The Project of Critique
1/8 Introduction to Kant: The Project of Critique This course is focused on the interpretation of one book: The Critique of Pure Reason and we will, during the course, read the majority of the key sections
More informationRichard van de Lagemaat Relative Values A Dialogue
Theory of Knowledge Mr. Blackmon Richard van de Lagemaat Relative Values A Dialogue In the following dialogue by Richard van de Lagemaat, two characters, Jack and Jill, argue about whether or not there
More informationDR. LEONARD PEIKOFF. Lecture 3 THE METAPHYSICS OF TWO WORLDS: ITS RESULTS IN THIS WORLD
Founders of Western Philosophy: Thales to Hume a 12-lecture course by DR. LEONARD PEIKOFF Edited by LINDA REARDAN, A.M. Lecture 3 THE METAPHYSICS OF TWO WORLDS: ITS RESULTS IN THIS WORLD A Publication
More informationSUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT David Hume: The Origin of Our Ideas and Skepticism about Causal Reasoning
SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 2 Textbook: Louis P. Pojman, Editor. Philosophy: The quest for truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 0199697310; ISBN-13: 9780199697311 (6th Edition)
More informationWords and their Meaning
LESSON 2 OF 23 James M. Grier, Th.D. Distinguished Professor of Philosophical Theology at Grand Rapids Theological Seminary in Grand Rapids, Michigan WE503 Christian Ethics: A Biblical Theology of Morality
More informationAncient Philosophy. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Ancient Philosophy Instructor: Jason Sheley Plato's Euthyphro I am going to suggest a way of reading the Euthyphro and Crito in relation to the Republic and Plato's other works. First, both dialogues are
More informationONTOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF PLURALIST RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES
ONTOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF PLURALIST RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES Donald J Falconer and David R Mackay School of Management Information Systems Faculty of Business and Law Deakin University Geelong 3217 Australia
More informationTo Provoke or to Encourage? - Combining Both within the Same Methodology
To Provoke or to Encourage? - Combining Both within the Same Methodology ILANA MAYMIND Doctoral Candidate in Comparative Studies College of Humanities Can one's teaching be student nurturing and at the
More informationChapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System
Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Ethics and Morality Ethics: greek ethos, study of morality What is Morality? Morality: system of rules for guiding
More informationPeter Singer, Practical Ethics Discussion Questions/Study Guide Prepared by Prof. Bill Felice
Peter Singer, Practical Ethics Discussion Questions/Study Guide Prepared by Prof. Bill Felice Ch. 1: "About Ethics," p. 1-15 1) Clarify and discuss the different ethical theories: Deontological approaches-ethics
More informationWell, how are we supposed to know that Jesus performed miracles on earth? Pretty clearly, the answer is: on the basis of testimony.
Miracles Last time we were discussing the Incarnation, and in particular the question of how one might acquire sufficient evidence for it to be rational to believe that a human being, Jesus of Nazareth,
More informationBEING FRANCISCAN Class Eight September 27, Franciscan Presence and Dialogue: Living with Diversity in a Pluralistic Society
BEING FRANCISCAN Class Eight September 27, 2018 Franciscan Presence and Dialogue: Living with Diversity in a Pluralistic Society Pope Francis told young people in Estonia, two days ago: They [young people]
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 3 February 11th, 2016 Harman, Ethics and Observation 1 (finishing up our All About Arguments discussion) A common theme linking many of the fallacies we covered is that
More informationOutline Lesson 2 - Philosophy & Ethics: Says Who?
Outline Lesson 2 - Philosophy & Ethics: Says Who? I. Introduction Have you been taken captive? - 2 Timothy 2:24-26 A. Scriptural warning against hollow and deceptive philosophy Colossians 2:8 B. Carl Sagan
More informationTHE QUESTION OF "UNIVERSALITY VERSUS PARTICULARITY?" IN THE LIGHT OF EPISTEMOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE OF NORMS
THE QUESTION OF "UNIVERSALITY VERSUS PARTICULARITY?" IN THE LIGHT OF EPISTEMOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE OF NORMS Ioanna Kuçuradi Universality and particularity are two relative terms. Some would prefer to call
More informationResponses to Respondents RESPONSE #1 Why I Reject Exegetical Conservatism
Responses to Respondents RESPONSE #1 Why I Reject Exegetical Conservatism I think all of us can agree that the following exegetical principle, found frequently in fundamentalistic circles, is a mistake:
More informationShafer-Landau's defense against Blackburn's supervenience argument
University of Gothenburg Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science Shafer-Landau's defense against Blackburn's supervenience argument Author: Anna Folland Supervisor: Ragnar Francén Olinder
More informationHistory and the Christian Faith Contributed by Michael Gleghorn
History and the Christian Faith Contributed by Michael Gleghorn History and the Christian Faith The Importance of History Can we really know anything at all about the past? For example, can we really know
More informationThe problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...
The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Defining induction... 2 3.0 Induction versus deduction... 2 4.0 Hume's descriptive
More informationReview of Nathan M. Nobis s Truth in Ethics and Epistemology
Review of Nathan M. Nobis s Truth in Ethics and Epistemology by James W. Gray November 19, 2010 (This is available on my website Ethical Realism.) Abstract Moral realism is the view that moral facts exist
More informationRichard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING
1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process
More informationMeasuring Your Leadership Growth
Measuring Your Leadership Growth (An Evaluation for Growing Leaders) 1 Search me, O God, and know my heart; Try me and know my anxious thoughts; and see if there be any hurtful way in me, and lead me in
More informationHistory and the Christian Faith
History and the Christian Faith For many people in our world today history, as Henry Ford once said, is bunk. Indeed, some people go so far as to say that we really can t know anything at all about the
More informationUnit 3: Philosophy as Theoretical Rationality
Unit 3: Philosophy as Theoretical Rationality INTRODUCTORY TEXT. Perhaps the most unsettling thought many of us have, often quite early on in childhood, is that the whole world might be a dream; that the
More informationThe Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle
This paper is dedicated to my unforgettable friend Boris Isaevich Lamdon. The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle The essence of formal logic The aim of every science is to discover the laws
More informationOSSA Conference Archive OSSA 3
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 3 May 15th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM Commentary on Schwed Lawrence Powers Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive
More informationWhat should I believe? What should I believe when people disagree with me?
What should I believe? What should I believe when people disagree with me? Imagine that you are at a horse track with a friend. Two horses, Whitey and Blacky, are competing for the lead down the stretch.
More informationAFFIRMATIONS OF FAITH
The Apostle Paul challenges Christians of all ages as follows: I urge you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have
More informationFourfold Communication as a Way to Cooperation
1 Fourfold Communication as a Way to Cooperation Ordinary conversation about trivial matters is often a bit careless. We try to listen and talk simultaneously, although that is very difficult. The exchange
More informationHow Trustworthy is the Bible? (1) Written by Cornelis Pronk
Higher Criticism of the Bible is not a new phenomenon but a problem that has plagued the church for over a century and a-half. Spawned by the anti-supernatural spirit of the eighteenth century movement,
More informationTHE UNITY OF THEOLOGY
THE UNITY OF THEOLOGY An article in the current issue of Theological Studies by John Thornhill of the Society of Mary (sent, by the way, from a town with the fascinating name of Toongabbie in New South
More informationGetting To God. The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism. truehorizon.org
Getting To God The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism truehorizon.org A True Worldview A worldview is like a set of glasses through which you see everything in life. It is the lens that brings
More informationEthics is subjective.
Introduction Scientific Method and Research Ethics Ethical Theory Greg Bognar Stockholm University September 22, 2017 Ethics is subjective. If ethics is subjective, then moral claims are subjective in
More informationIn Defense of Culpable Ignorance
It is common in everyday situations and interactions to hold people responsible for things they didn t know but which they ought to have known. For example, if a friend were to jump off the roof of a house
More informationThe St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox
The St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox Consider the following bet: The St. Petersburg I am going to flip a fair coin until it comes up heads. If the first time it comes up heads is on the
More informationE L O G O S ELECTRONIC JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY/2008 ISSN Tracks in the Woods. F.A. Hayek s Philosophy of History.
E L O G O S ELECTRONIC JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY/2008 ISSN 1211-0442 Tracks in the Woods F.A. Hayek s Philosophy of History By: Graham Baker In the following pages I should like to expound what I take to
More informationOn Quine, Grice and Strawson, and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. by Christian Green
On Quine, Grice and Strawson, and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction by Christian Green Evidently such a position of extreme skepticism about a distinction is not in general justified merely by criticisms,
More informationA-LEVEL Religious Studies
A-LEVEL Religious Studies RST3B Paper 3B Philosophy of Religion Mark Scheme 2060 June 2017 Version: 1.0 Final Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
More informationappearance is often different from reality, and it s reality that counts.
Relativism Appearance vs. Reality Philosophy begins with the realisation that appearance is often different from reality, and it s reality that counts. Parmenides and others were maybe hyper Parmenides
More informationMORAL RELATIVISM. By: George Bassilios St Antonius Coptic Orthodox Church, San Francisco Bay Area
MORAL RELATIVISM By: George Bassilios St Antonius Coptic Orthodox Church, San Francisco Bay Area Introduction In this age, we have lost the confidence that statements of fact can ever be anything more
More informationDiocesan Guidelines for Parish Pastoral Councils Diocese of San Jose, CA
Diocesan Guidelines for Parish Pastoral Councils Diocese of San Jose, CA Introduction. Vatican II called on all Catholics to recognize and respond to their vocation to ministry. This call includes an invitation
More informationPHIL 155: The Scientific Method, Part 1: Naïve Inductivism. January 14, 2013
PHIL 155: The Scientific Method, Part 1: Naïve Inductivism January 14, 2013 Outline 1 Science in Action: An Example 2 Naïve Inductivism 3 Hempel s Model of Scientific Investigation Semmelweis Investigations
More informationBiblical Resolutions for the New Year. Philippians 3: 7-11
Biblical Resolutions for the New Year Philippians 3: 7-11 It doesn t seem possible, but once again we are closing out another calendar year and anticipating the arrival of the New Year. Often we reminisce
More informationv o i c e A Document for Dialogue and Study Report of the Task Force on Human Sexuality The Alliance of Baptists
The Alliance of Baptists Aclear v o i c e A Document for Dialogue and Study The Alliance of Baptists 1328 16th Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202.745.7609 Toll-free: 866.745.7609 Fax: 202.745.0023
More information[3.] Bertrand Russell. 1
[3.] Bertrand Russell. 1 [3.1.] Biographical Background. 1872: born in the city of Trellech, in the county of Monmouthshire, now part of Wales 2 One of his grandfathers was Lord John Russell, who twice
More informationIs There a Perennial Wisdom? Rev. Ken Read-Brown First Parish in Hingham (Old Ship Church) Unitarian Universalist January 5, 2014
Is There a Perennial Wisdom? Rev. Ken Read-Brown First Parish in Hingham (Old Ship Church) Unitarian Universalist January 5, 2014 Readings from the Bhagavad Gita: I will speak to you now of that great
More informationAre There Moral Facts
Are There Moral Facts Birkbeck Philosophy Study Guide 2016 Are There Moral Facts? Dr. Cristian Constantinescu & Prof. Hallvard Lillehammer Department of Philosophy, Birkbeck College This Study Guide is
More informationEvidence and Transcendence
Evidence and Transcendence Religious Epistemology and the God-World Relationship Anne E. Inman University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Copyright 2008 by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame,
More informationAm I free? Freedom vs. Fate
Am I free? Freedom vs. Fate We ve been discussing the free will defense as a response to the argument from evil. This response assumes something about us: that we have free will. But what does this mean?
More informationQuine on the analytic/synthetic distinction
Quine on the analytic/synthetic distinction Jeff Speaks March 14, 2005 1 Analyticity and synonymy.............................. 1 2 Synonymy and definition ( 2)............................ 2 3 Synonymy
More informationBENEDIKT PAUL GÖCKE. Ruhr-Universität Bochum
264 BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTICES BENEDIKT PAUL GÖCKE Ruhr-Universität Bochum István Aranyosi. God, Mind, and Logical Space: A Revisionary Approach to Divinity. Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion.
More informationClass Meeting 3 Chapter 3 Learning the Role of the Musician
Conversational Evangelism - 1 - Chapter 3 Learning the Role of the Musician Redefining What We Mean by Evangelism (Expanded Definition of Evangelism) Every day and in every way helping our pre-believing
More information[name] [course] [teaching assistant s name] [discussion day and time] [question being answered] [date turned in] Cultural Relativism
5 [name] [course] [teaching assistant s name] [discussion day and time] [question being answered] [date turned in] Cultural Relativism In James Rachels s chapter The Challenge of Cultural Relativism, he
More informationTrinity & contradiction
Trinity & contradiction Today we ll discuss one of the most distinctive, and philosophically most problematic, Christian doctrines: the doctrine of the Trinity. It is tempting to see the doctrine of the
More informationThank you, President Mills. I am honored to be speaking before my colleagues
Thank you, President Mills. I am honored to be speaking before my colleagues on the faculty and staff, before parents and guests, and especially before the Class of 2009. By this point in orientation,
More informationCompatibilism and the Basic Argument
ESJP #12 2017 Compatibilism and the Basic Argument Lennart Ackermans 1 Introduction In his book Freedom Evolves (2003) and article (Taylor & Dennett, 2001), Dennett constructs a compatibilist theory of
More informationREPLY TO BURGOS (2015)
Behavior and Philosophy, 44, 41-45 (2016). 2016 Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies REPLY TO BURGOS (2015) Teed Rockwell Sonoma State University I appreciate the detailed attention Dr. Burgos has given
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy As soon as Sophie had closed the gate behind her she opened the envelope. It contained only a slip of paper no bigger than envelope. It read: Who are you? Nothing else, only
More information