Torture Does Timing Matter?

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Torture Does Timing Matter?"

Transcription

1 1 Caspar Hare March 2013 Forthcoming in the Journal of Moral Philosophy please cite that version if you can Torture Does Timing Matter? Torture is it ever, morally speaking, the thing to do? Of course! many philosophers eagerly answer. Just make the stakes big enough: Suppose you know you can save the lives of thirty children by, and only by, beating up a captive terrorist. Isn t that the thing to do? If you don t yield to the force of this example, then we can make it a hundred children, we can make it a thousand children, we can make it the population of Belgium, we can make it the human race, we can make it all sentient life in the universe. If you still don t yield then... well, you are beyond help. Fair enough. But what if we go in the other direction? What if we make the stakes smaller? What if, say, we make it not thirty children, but five adults? In the first chapter of her very interesting book, Ethics for Enemies: Frances Kamm argues that in a class of such situations it is morally permissible to torture. Her basic strategy is to say that in these situations it is permissible to kill people so as to prevent harm coming to other people, and then say that, because it is permissible to kill people so as to prevent harm coming to other people, it is permissible to torture people as to prevent harm coming to other people after all, they are better off tortured than killed! She first has in mind situations in which we can cause people pain so as to prevent them from doing things that will harm others. She is more cautious about extending her arguments to what she calls ex post cases cases in which there is some time delay between what is naturally described as the malicious action (e.g. the terrorist setting a bomb), and what are naturally described as its bad effects (e.g. the explosion and its aftermath), and, during that time, we are in a position to prevent the bad effects from coming about (e.g. by inducing the terrorist, through torture, to reveal the location of the bomb.)

2 2 So, can we apply this strategy to ex post cases? I would like to use my space here to investigate this question. And I would like to do it in a way that I take to be true to the spirit of Frances Kamm s project. I will suppose, with her, that the interesting question in this area of moral theory concerns the permissibility of actions. I will suppose, with her, that act consequentialist moral theories are incorrect. Generally: the permissibility of an action is not determined by the value of its outcome, relative to the value of the outcomes of the alternatives available to the agent. More specifically: the celebrated counterexamples to act consequentialism involving rights violation really are counterexamples to act consequentialism. It is not permissible to kill an innocent, uncooperative person so as to distribute his organs to five others in desperate need, not permissible to kill an innocent, uncooperative person so as to block a trolley that will otherwise crush five others etc. And I will try, as far as possible, to use suitably Kammian methods of moral enquiry. I will focus on some macabre imaginary cases. I will forcefully state my convictions concerning moral permissibility in these cases. I will emphasize the strength of my convictions, and the fact that I have no particular argument to support them, by saying Surely. I will treat these convictions as data that a good moral theory must accommodate. None of what follows will seem very interesting to you if you do not share the convictions. But I expect, based on conversations with a seemingly- representative sample of philosophers, that you will share them. 2. Killing Evil- Doers Let s start on what seems to me to be solid ground.

3 3 Evil- Doer on the Footbridge As in the classic Judy Thomson case, 1 a trolley is careering toward five innocent, immobile people. The only way you can save the five is by pushing a guy off a footbridge into the path of the trolley, stopping it and killing him. But (and here we depart from the classic Thomson Case) this is not just any guy. He tied the five to the track, aimed the trolley at them and set it in motion! He is rubbing his hands and cackling with villainous glee. He wants to watch them die. I say that, in this particular case, it is permissible for you to push the evil- doer off the footbridge. Surely it is permissible for you to do it. If you are initially reluctant to agree then I encourage you to do a couple of things. First consider the narrowness of the claim. I am not saying that, once the evil- doer has tied the five to the track and set the trolley in motion, it is fine for you to do just anything to him that serves the greater good. Maybe it is not fine for you to chop him up and distribute his organs to the distant organ- needy. Nor am I even saying that it is fine for you to do anything to him that will save the lives of these five people. Maybe, if these five people are organ- needy, it is not fine for you to remove his organs (you are a skillful, speedy surgeon) before pushing what remains of his body in front of the trolley. I am just saying that in this particular case it is fine for you to push the evil- doer off the footbridge, into the path of the trolley. Second, imagine that you have pushed the evil- doer down onto the track and, in the split second before he is hit by the trolley, he looks back up at you. Ask yourself: can he muster anything like righteous outrage? Surely he cannot. Any objection he might have had 1 See Thomson (1985).

4 4 to being pushed in front of the trolley and crushed in order to save the five people withers in light of the fact that he set that trolley in motion in order to crush them. If you are still reluctant to agree then I have nothing further to say. Let s move on. 3. Torturing Evil- Doers What, then, should we think about a quite similar case, where you can stop the trolley not by killing the evil- doer, but by torturing him? Evil- Doer with the Brake- Code As above, but this time the only way you can save the five is by broadcasting a coded message that will activate the trolley s brakes. You don t know the brake code. The guy does. The only way you can get it is by torturing it from him. One method Frances Kamm uses to get traction on pairs of cases like Evil- Doer on the Footbridge and Evil- Doer with the Brake- Code is to consider a third case in which both options are open to you: Evil- Doer on the Footbridge with the Brake- Code As above, but this time you have two ways of saving the five. You can stop the trolley by pushing the guy off the bridge, and you can stop the trolley by torturing the brake- code from him. Maybe it is fine if, out of concern for the guy, you choose to torture him rather than kill him. He is better off tortured than dead.

5 5 Does it follow that it is permissible to torture the guy in Evil- Doer with the Brake Code? Not immediately. Maybe it is permissible to torture him when the killing- him option is there, impermissible when it isn t. Frances Kamm draws our attention to a case in which one might think it permissible to cause someone harm in a certain way when the option of causing them worse harm in a permissible way is open to you, impermissible when that option is not open to you: Bystander at the Footbridge An innocent person is standing on the bridge. You can save the five only by pushing him onto the track in which case he will be paralyzed, or by diverting the trolley in which case it will bend around and over the bridge, and he will be killed (embellish the story to make this true). Maybe it is fine if, out of concern for the guy, you choose to paralyze- him- by- pushing rather than kill- him- by- switching in this case. But it does not follow that it is fine to paralyze- him- by- pushing when the kill- him- by- switching option is not open to you. If we take rights seriously then we may well think that there are many cases with this basic structure. Here s one that involves property rights: Your Crate or Mine? You and I are hungry. You come across two crates of Weetabix beside my house. One was dropped by a relief plane first come first served. The other is mine. The relief crate contains more, fresher Weetabix than my crate. You can take either crate. Maybe it is fine for you to take my crate, leaving me the relief crate, when the option of taking the relief crate is open to you (after all it is fine for you to take the relief crate, and

6 6 better for me that you take my crate instead of the relief crate). But it certainly is not fine for you to take my crate when the option of taking the relief crate is not open to you. The useful thing that the footbridge cases do is to make it clear that it is better for the evil- doer to be tortured than killed, and to make it clear that, if we think it is impermissible to torture him in Evil- Doer with the Brake Code, then we cannot explain why it is impermissible just by pointing to ways in which it is bad for him to be tortured. It would be permissible for you to do some much worse things to him, for the sake of saving the five. So, why might it be impermissible to torture the guy in Evil- Doer with the Brake Code, yet permissible to kill him in Evil- Doer on the Footbridge? Let s go through some differences between the cases, and see if the differences matter. 3. Differences Between Torturing and Killing- by- Pushing I: Degrees of Implication When you act in a way that brings harm to one person and benefit to some others, say that the harm is maximally implicated in the benefit when every chain of sufficient causes from the act to the benefit includes the harm. When the harm is not maximally implicated in the benefit, say that it is implicated to a low degree in the benefit when there is a chain of sufficient causes from the act to the benefit such that the harm is a distant effect of events in that chain, say that it is implicated to a high degree in the benefit when there is no such chain. In a classic Thomson Bystander case (in which you can save the five from being crushed by a trolley only by switching it onto a siding, where it will crush one unfortunate person) the harm to the one (supposing you switch) is implicated in the benefit to the five to a relatively low degree. There is a sufficient causal chain from your act to the benefit to the five such that the harm to the one is a relatively distant effect of events in that chain. How

7 7 about in Evil- Doer on the Footbridge? Well, that depends on exactly what stops the trolley in that case. One way of filling in the details: Evil- Doer on the Footbridge Precisification I Why will the trolley stop if you push the evil- doer in front of it? It has a sophisticated automatic cruise control system that makes use of radar with a range of 100ft. If the system detects a large object on the track 100ft ahead then it activates the trolley s brakes. Sadly, at the speed the trolley is traveling, it takes 150ft to stop. Put in a diagram (the arrows represent causal relations between events) here is what will happen if you push him: Effects of your Pushing the Evil- Doer You push the evil- doer He lies on the track, stunned, 100ft in front of the trolley The trolley detects him The trolley brakes He is still on the track 5 seconds later The trolley does not harm the five The trolley harms him terribly In this case the harm to the one is implicated in the benefit to the five to a higher degree than in a Thomson Bystander case. There is no chain of sufficient causes from your act to

8 8 the benefit to the five such that the harm to the one is a very distant effect of events in that chain. Another way of filling in the details: Evil- Doer on the Footbridge Precisification II Why will the trolley stop if you push the evil- doer in front of it? It has an unsophisticated automatic cruise control system, sensitive only to impacts. If the system detects an impact then it activates the trolley s brakes. Put in a diagram: Effects of your Pushing the Evil- Doer You push the evil- doer The trolley impacts him The trolley harms him terribly The trolley brakes The trolley does not harm the five In this case the harm is implicated in the benefit to yet- higher degree, but it is not maximally implicated in the benefit. There remains a chain of sufficient causes from act to benefit (on the left, in the diagram) that does not include the harm. But in Evil- Doer with a Brake- Code the harm you do to the evil- doer by torturing him is maximally implicated in the benefit to the five. The event of him suffering pain is part of every chain of sufficient causes from your torturing him to the five being saved. Does this

9 9 difference matter? By pointing it out, can we explain why it is impermissible to torture in Evil- Doer with a Brake- Code? The background idea would be broadly Kantian. In cases where you harm one, save five, and the harm to the one is maximally implicated in the benefit to the five, you are, no bones about it, using the harm to the one as a means to the saving of the five. And it is not morally permissible to use people, guilty or innocent, in this way. In a nutshell: the prohibition against your harming one person cannot be over- ridden by the consideration that you are benefiting others when the harm to the one is maximally implicated in the benefit to the others. But I do not find the idea very promising. It is trampled beneath my convictions. Consider: Evil- Doer on the Footbridge Precisification III Why will the trolley stop if you push the evil- doer in front of it? It has an ultra- sophisticated automatic cruise control system, sensitive only to terrible harm in the vicinity of the trolley. If the system detects terrible harm in the vicinity of the trolley then it activates the trolley s brakes. I say it is still fine to push the evil- doer in front of the trolley in this case. Surely it is fine to do it. But the harm you do to him is now maximally implicated in the benefit you bring to the five. 4. Differences Between Torturing and Killing- by- Pushing II Agential Involvement Torturing an evil- doer typically requires some effort, some determination on your part. To torture him effectively you really have to be focused on causing him pain. Pushing an evil- doer off a footbridge (even in Evil- Doer on the Footbridge Precisification III) does

10 10 not. You can (if the case is understood in the natural way) sidle up to him, give him a shove, then walk away with your hands in your pockets, whistling. Might this somehow explain why it is impermissible to torture in Evil- Doer with the Brake Code? I do not find this idea very promising either. Consider: Evil- Doer on the Footbridge the Effortful Variant As above the trolley has an ultra- sophisticated automatic cruise control system, sensitive only to terrible harm in its near vicinity. But this time a simple push will not do the job. You have to push the evil- doer off the footbridge, jump down and hold him there while he thrashes about, right up to the instant before the trolley hits him. Surely it is fine to do this, though to do it effectively you really have to be focused on causing the evil- doer harm. As an exercise: Imagine that, towards the end of a movie, the hero does this to the villain. Should you think worse of the hero? Is there any reasonable objection that the villain could have to his being crushed by the trolley? I say no and no. If the villain did not want to be crushed by the trolley then he should not have engineered this situation in which his being crushed by the trolley is the only way to prevent his victims being crushed by the trolley. 5. Differences Between Torturing and Killing- by- Pushing III Divisive Coercion As David Sussman has pointed out, 2 when you torture the evil- doer in a case like Evil- Doer with the Brake Code you coerce him in a peculiar way. It is not that you change the pay- offs associated with talking and not- talking, so that he now has an all things considered preference for talking. Nor do you just cause him to behave in a way that he 2 See Sussman 2005.

11 11 would rather not behave in a manner that is unmediated by his cognition. Rather, you make it the case that different parts of him are at odds. One part of him would rather talk- and- not- suffer than not- talk- and- suffer. Another part would rather not- talk- and- suffer than talk- and- not- suffer. You divide him. Might this explain why torturing the evil- doer is not impermissible? Once again the idea does not look promising to me. It seems to be pointing to another way in which being tortured is bad for him, but we have already seen that we will not explain why the torturing is impermissible just by pointing to ways in which it is bad for him. 6. Differences Between Torturing and Killing- by- Pushing IV New Threats And so to what seems to me to be the last, best hope for making a case that it is impermissible to torture in Evil- Doer with the Brake Code. In that case the harm that comes to him if you intervene (being tortured), is very unlike the harm that he would otherwise inflict on the five (being crushed by the trolley). In Evil- Doer on the Footbridge, on the other hand, the harm that comes to him if you intervene (being crushed by the trolley) is just like the harm that he would otherwise inflict on the five (being crushed by the very same trolley). Maybe this matters. Maybe something like this is true: Other things being equal, it is permissible to harm a person so as to prevent him or her from harming five others only when the harms are relevantly similar. Let me say a couple of things about this idea. First, if the idea is right then it remains okay to torture one so as to save five in some rather unusual cases. For example: The Pain Machine You are in a room with the evil- doer, a pain machine and his five victims. He has padlocked them to the machine. They are in agony. The machine has a keypad and

12 12 shut- down code. You don t know the code. The only way (fill in the details of the strory to make this true) you can stop the machine is by forcibly padlocking the evil- doer to it too. Then, in agony himself, he will tell you the code. Here it remains okay to torture the one so as to save the five, because the harm you to do the one is just the same as the harm he would otherwise inflict on the five. Second, in order to apply the idea we need some sense of what relevant similarity amounts to. Clearly we are supposed to regard being crushed by the trolley right beneath this footbridge (the harm that comes to the evil- doer if you intervene) as relevantly similar to being crushed by the same trolley two hundred yards down the track (the harm that will otherwise come to the five). But what about a case like this: Evil- Doer on the Footbridge the Two Track Variant Once again the trolley, call it trolley A, is steaming toward the five, set in motion by the evil- doer. But this time you and he are on a footbridge over a different track. Another trolley, call it trolley B, is steaming down this track towards the footbridge. Fortunately the trolleys are fitted with networked automatic cruise control systems. When one brakes, they all brake. So, by pushing the evil- doer off the footbridge into the path of trolley B, you can stop trolley A and save the five. Is being crushed by trolley B appropriately similar to being crushed by trolley A? I do not have a good sense of how to answer this question. And there s a reason for this. To answer the question of what sorts of similarity are relevant we would need to have some explanation of why it matters that the harm to the one is in some ways similar to the harm he would otherwise inflict on the five. And I see no explanation forthcoming.

13 13 6. Conclusion So I do not yet see a difference between the Evil- Doer on the Footbridge and Evil- Doer with the Brake Code cases that would explain why it is permissible to push the evil- doer in the one case, impermissible to torture the evil- doer in the other. This suggests to me that there is no such difference. It is permissible to torture in Evil- Doer with the Brake Code. Sometimes it is permissible to torture when the stakes are quite small. I should end with a disclaimer (just in case somebody with power over public policy reads this unlikely, but you never know): It does not immediately follow from torture being morally permissible in certain less- than- catastrophic circumstances that torture should be legal in these circumstances. The case for upholding an exception- less ban on torture, extending through law into military policy, is strong. Indeed the case for us, as individuals, refusing to acknowledge that torture is sometimes the thing to do, is strong. My conclusion here may be one of those truths that should be murmured once and then forgotten. References Kamm, Frances, Ethics for Enemies, Oxford University Press Sussman, David (2005) What is Wrong with Torture?, Philosophy and Public Affairs 33, no. 1 (2005) 1-33 Thomson, Judith, (1985) The Trolley Problem, Yale Law Journal 94 (1985):

The Trolley Problem. 1. The Trolley Problem: Consider the following pair of cases:

The Trolley Problem. 1. The Trolley Problem: Consider the following pair of cases: The Trolley Problem 1. The Trolley Problem: Consider the following pair of cases: Trolley: There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway tracks. Ahead, on the tracks, there are five people. The

More information

Phil 108, July 15, 2010

Phil 108, July 15, 2010 Phil 108, July 15, 2010 Foot on intending vs. foreseeing and doing vs. allowing: Two kinds of effects an action can have: What the agent merely foresees will happen because of his action. What the agent

More information

Quinn s Doctrine of Doing and Allowing (DDA)

Quinn s Doctrine of Doing and Allowing (DDA) Quinn s Doctrine of Doing and Allowing (DDA) 1. Against Foot & Bennett: Recall Philippa Foot s proposal: Doing harm is initiating or sustaining a harmful sequence. (And allowing harm is failing to prevent

More information

Must Consequentialists Kill?

Must Consequentialists Kill? Must Consequentialists Kill? Kieran Setiya MIT December 10, 2017 (Draft; do not cite without permission) It is widely held that, in ordinary circumstances, you should not kill one stranger in order to

More information

How should I live? I should do whatever brings about the most pleasure (or, at least, the most good)

How should I live? I should do whatever brings about the most pleasure (or, at least, the most good) How should I live? I should do whatever brings about the most pleasure (or, at least, the most good) Suppose that some actions are right, and some are wrong. What s the difference between them? What makes

More information

THOMSON S TROLLEY PROBLEM. Peter A. Graham

THOMSON S TROLLEY PROBLEM. Peter A. Graham Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy Vol. 12, No. 2 November 2017 https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v12i2.227 2017 Author THOMSON S TROLLEY PROBLEM Peter A. Graham N o one has done more over the past four

More information

Thomson s turnabout on the trolley

Thomson s turnabout on the trolley 636 william j. fitzpatrick Thomson s turnabout on the trolley WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK The (in)famous trolley problem began as a simple variation on an example given in passing by Philippa Foot (1967), involving

More information

Intending Versus Foreseeing Harm

Intending Versus Foreseeing Harm Intending Versus Foreseeing Harm The Trolley Problem: Consider the following pair of cases: Trolley: There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway tracks. Ahead, on the tracks, there are five people.

More information

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 8: Double Effect, Doing-Allowing, and the Trolley Problem: 1. Two Distinctions Common in Deontology 2. The Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) 3. Why believe DDE? 4. The Doctrine

More information

Psychological Aspects of Social Issues

Psychological Aspects of Social Issues Psychological Aspects of Social Issues Chapter 6 Nonconsequentialist Theories Do Your Duty 1 Outline/Overview The Ethics of Immanuel Kant Imperatives, hypothetical and categorical Means-end principle Evaluating

More information

Quinn s DDE. 1. Quinn s DDE: Warren Quinn begins by running through the familiar pairs of cases:

Quinn s DDE. 1. Quinn s DDE: Warren Quinn begins by running through the familiar pairs of cases: Quinn s DDE 1. Quinn s DDE: Warren Quinn begins by running through the familiar pairs of cases: Strategic Bomber vs. Terror Bomber Direction of Resources vs. Guinea Pigs Hysterectomy vs. Craniotomy What

More information

Scanlon on Double Effect

Scanlon on Double Effect Scanlon on Double Effect RALPH WEDGWOOD Merton College, University of Oxford In this new book Moral Dimensions, T. M. Scanlon (2008) explores the ethical significance of the intentions and motives with

More information

Ethics is subjective.

Ethics is subjective. Introduction Scientific Method and Research Ethics Ethical Theory Greg Bognar Stockholm University September 22, 2017 Ethics is subjective. If ethics is subjective, then moral claims are subjective in

More information

Plato s Republic Book 3&4. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Plato s Republic Book 3&4. Instructor: Jason Sheley Plato s Republic Book 3&4 Instructor: Jason Sheley What do we want out of a theory of Justice, anyway? The Trolley Problem The trolley problem: A trolley is running out of control down a track. In its

More information

in Social Science Encyclopedia (Routledge, forthcoming, 2006). Consequentialism (Blackwell Publishers, forthcoming, 2006)

in Social Science Encyclopedia (Routledge, forthcoming, 2006). Consequentialism (Blackwell Publishers, forthcoming, 2006) in Social Science Encyclopedia (Routledge, forthcoming, 2006). Consequentialism Ethics in Practice, 3 rd edition, edited by Hugh LaFollette (Blackwell Publishers, forthcoming, 2006) Peter Vallentyne, University

More information

Double Effect and Terror Bombing

Double Effect and Terror Bombing GAP.8 Proceedings (forthcoming) Double Effect and Terror Bombing Ezio Di Nucci I argue against the Doctrine of Double Effect s explanation of the moral difference between terror bombing and strategic bombing.

More information

Judge s Two Options: he can (i) let the rioters kill the five hostages, or (ii) frame an innocent person for the crime, and have him executed.

Judge s Two Options: he can (i) let the rioters kill the five hostages, or (ii) frame an innocent person for the crime, and have him executed. JUDITH JARVIS THOMSON Turning the Trolley i The trolley problem is by now thoroughly familiar, but it pays to begin with a description of its origins. In The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the

More information

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 5: Utilitarianism: 1. More moral principles 2. Uncontroversially wrong actions 3. The suffering principle 4. J.S. Mill and Utilitarianism 5. The Lack of Time Argument 6. Presenting,

More information

Thresholds for Rights

Thresholds for Rights The Southern Journal of Philosophy (1995) Vol. XXXIII Thresholds for Rights The University of Western Ontario, Canada INTRODUCTION When, on the basis of the consequences that can be brought about by infringing

More information

Is it Reasonable to Rely on Intuitions in Ethics? as relying on intuitions, though I will argue that this description is deeply misleading.

Is it Reasonable to Rely on Intuitions in Ethics? as relying on intuitions, though I will argue that this description is deeply misleading. Elizabeth Harman 01/19/10 forthcoming in Norton Introduction to Philosophy Is it Reasonable to Rely on Intuitions in Ethics? Some philosophers argue for ethical conclusions by relying on specific ethical

More information

DEFENDING DOUBLE EFFECT Ralph Wedgwood

DEFENDING DOUBLE EFFECT Ralph Wedgwood DEFENDING DOUBLE EFFECT Ralph Wedgwood Abstract This essay defends a version of the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) the doctrine that there is normally a stronger reason against an act that has a bad state

More information

The Moral Significance of Animal Pain and Animal Death. Elizabeth Harman. I. Animal Cruelty and Animal Killing

The Moral Significance of Animal Pain and Animal Death. Elizabeth Harman. I. Animal Cruelty and Animal Killing forthcoming in Handbook on Ethics and Animals, Tom L. Beauchamp and R. G. Frey, eds., Oxford University Press The Moral Significance of Animal Pain and Animal Death Elizabeth Harman I. Animal Cruelty and

More information

THE ROAD TO HELL by Alastair Norcross 1. Introduction: The Doctrine of the Double Effect.

THE ROAD TO HELL by Alastair Norcross 1. Introduction: The Doctrine of the Double Effect. THE ROAD TO HELL by Alastair Norcross 1. Introduction: The Doctrine of the Double Effect. My concern in this paper is a distinction most commonly associated with the Doctrine of the Double Effect (DDE).

More information

ETHICS. H istory, Theory, and Contemporary Issues. Steven M. Cahn. Peter Markie FOURTH EDITION. Edited by

ETHICS. H istory, Theory, and Contemporary Issues. Steven M. Cahn. Peter Markie FOURTH EDITION. Edited by ETHICS H istory, Theory, and Contemporary Issues FOURTH EDITION Edited by Steven M. Cahn The City University of New York Graduate Center Peter Markie University of Missouri-Columbia New York Oxford OXFORD

More information

WHEN is a moral theory self-defeating? I suggest the following.

WHEN is a moral theory self-defeating? I suggest the following. COLLECTIVE IRRATIONALITY 533 Marxist "instrumentalism": that is, the dominant economic class creates and imposes the non-economic conditions for and instruments of its continued economic dominance. The

More information

Sentimentalism, Blameworthiness, and Wrongdoing

Sentimentalism, Blameworthiness, and Wrongdoing Sentimentalism, Blameworthiness, and Wrongdoing Antti Kauppinen Final draft, August 17, 2015 For Karsten Stueber and Remy Debes (eds.), Ethical Sentimentalism. Cambridge University Press. It is relatively

More information

This webinar is designed for you to access once you have completed module one of the Ethics Learning programme.

This webinar is designed for you to access once you have completed module one of the Ethics Learning programme. Practising Ethics WEBINAR 1 This webinar is designed for you to access once you have completed module one of the Ethics Learning programme. There are five webinars in total that complement the Ethics Learning

More information

-- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use:

-- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: !#$%"%&$%# Citation: 94 Yale L. J. 1984-1985 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Tue Jan 20 10:35:59 2009 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of

More information

16 Free Will Requires Determinism

16 Free Will Requires Determinism 16 Free Will Requires Determinism John Baer The will is infinite, and the execution confined... the desire is boundless, and the act a slave to limit. William Shakespeare, Troilus and Cressida, III. ii.75

More information

Self-Defense, Permissions, and the Means Principle: A Reply to Quong

Self-Defense, Permissions, and the Means Principle: A Reply to Quong Self-Defense, Permissions, and the Means Principle: A Reply to Quong Kimberly Kessler Ferzan* In the self-defense literature, much theorizing centers around whether it is permissible to kill innocent aggressors

More information

NOTE ON THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT AND THE DOCTRINE OF ACTS AND OMISSIONS For Philosophy 13 Fall, 2004

NOTE ON THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT AND THE DOCTRINE OF ACTS AND OMISSIONS For Philosophy 13 Fall, 2004 1 NOTE ON THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT AND THE DOCTRINE OF ACTS AND OMISSIONS For Philosophy 13 Fall, 2004 1. THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT The Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) holds that in some contexts

More information

Modern neuroscience: Room for the soul? John Beggs

Modern neuroscience: Room for the soul? John Beggs Modern neuroscience: Room for the soul? John Beggs Outline Introduction Neuroscience background Free Will Ethics God Implications Outline Introduction Neuroscience background Free Will Ethics God Implications

More information

UTILITARIANISM AND INFINITE UTILITY. Peter Vallentyne. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (1993): I. Introduction

UTILITARIANISM AND INFINITE UTILITY. Peter Vallentyne. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (1993): I. Introduction UTILITARIANISM AND INFINITE UTILITY Peter Vallentyne Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (1993): 212-7. I. Introduction Traditional act utilitarianism judges an action permissible just in case it produces

More information

24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy

24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy Mill s Utilitarianism I. Introduction Recall that there are four questions one might ask an ethical theory to answer: a) Which acts are right and which are wrong? Which acts ought we to perform (understanding

More information

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an opponent of utilitarianism. Basic Summary: Kant, unlike Mill, believed that certain types of actions (including murder,

More information

Darius was sixty-two years old when he led the Medo-Persian army to victory in the city of Babylon (Dan. 5:30-31).

Darius was sixty-two years old when he led the Medo-Persian army to victory in the city of Babylon (Dan. 5:30-31). Faithful Daniel Darius was sixty-two years old when he led the Medo-Persian army to victory in the city of Babylon (Dan. 5:30-31). He had been born in 601 B.C., the son of Ahasruerus (Dan. 9:1), when Daniel

More information

INTRODUCTORY HANDOUT PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY---ETHICS Professor: Richard Arneson. TAs: Eric Campbell and Adam Streed.

INTRODUCTORY HANDOUT PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY---ETHICS Professor: Richard Arneson. TAs: Eric Campbell and Adam Streed. 1 INTRODUCTORY HANDOUT PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY---ETHICS Professor: Richard Arneson. TAs: Eric Campbell and Adam Streed. Lecture MWF 11:00-11:50 a.m. in Cognitive Science Bldg.

More information

Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, xiii pp.

Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, xiii pp. Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. xiii + 540 pp. 1. This is a book that aims to answer practical questions (such as whether and

More information

Deontology, Rationality, and Agent-Centered Restrictions

Deontology, Rationality, and Agent-Centered Restrictions Florida Philosophical Review Volume X, Issue 1, Summer 2010 75 Deontology, Rationality, and Agent-Centered Restrictions Brandon Hogan, University of Pittsburgh I. Introduction Deontological ethical theories

More information

Animal Disenhancement

Animal Disenhancement Animal Disenhancement 1. Animal Disenhancement: Just as advancements in nanotechnology and genetic engineering are giving rise to the possibility of ENHANCING human beings, they are also giving rise to

More information

Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect

Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect by Warren Quinn (1989) Situations in which good can be secured for some people only if others suffer harm are of great significance

More information

RESPONSE TO ADAM KOLBER S PUNISHMENT AND MORAL RISK

RESPONSE TO ADAM KOLBER S PUNISHMENT AND MORAL RISK RESPONSE TO ADAM KOLBER S PUNISHMENT AND MORAL RISK Chelsea Rosenthal* I. INTRODUCTION Adam Kolber argues in Punishment and Moral Risk that retributivists may be unable to justify criminal punishment,

More information

inertia Moral Philos Stud (2008) 140: DOI /s x Sartorio Carolina

inertia Moral Philos Stud (2008) 140: DOI /s x Sartorio Carolina Philos Stud (2008) 140:117-133 DOI 10.1007/s 11098-008-9229-x Moral inertia Carolina Sartorio Published online: 1 April 2008? Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Abstract I argue that, according

More information

18 Die Philippa Foot 1

18 Die Philippa Foot 1 think, that we simply do not have a satisfactory theory of morality, and need to look for it. Scanlon was indeed right in saying that the real answer to utilitarianism depends on progress in the development

More information

Tony Stark: The most famous mass murder in the history of America. This is one

Tony Stark: The most famous mass murder in the history of America. This is one Introduction and Portrayal of the Business World Tony Stark: The most famous mass murder in the history of America. This is one character s take on Tony and his weapon-making company in the movie. Iron

More information

David Ethics Bites is a series of interviews on applied ethics, produced in association with The Open University.

David Ethics Bites is a series of interviews on applied ethics, produced in association with The Open University. Ethics Bites What s Wrong With Killing? David Edmonds This is Ethics Bites, with me David Edmonds. Warburton And me Warburton. David Ethics Bites is a series of interviews on applied ethics, produced in

More information

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 7: Ross Theory of Prima Facie Duties 1. Something all our theories have had in common 2. W.D. Ross 3. The Concept of a Prima Facie Duty 4. Ross List of Prima Facie Duties

More information

Four Arguments that the Cognitive Psychology of Religion Undermines the Justification of Religious Belief

Four Arguments that the Cognitive Psychology of Religion Undermines the Justification of Religious Belief Four Arguments that the Cognitive Psychology of Religion Undermines the Justification of Religious Belief Michael J. Murray Over the last decade a handful of cognitive models of religious belief have begun

More information

Reflection on what was said about coercion above might suggest an alternative to PAP:

Reflection on what was said about coercion above might suggest an alternative to PAP: 24.00 Problems of Philosophy, Fall 2010 20. FRANKFURT ON ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES Frankfurt's basic contention is simple: contrary to what we have suggested, it is not true that you are not responsible

More information

Module 7: ethical behavior 1. Steps in this module: 2. Complete the case study Framework for Ethical Decision Making

Module 7: ethical behavior 1. Steps in this module: 2. Complete the case study Framework for Ethical Decision Making Module 7: ethical behavior 1 Your Passport to Professionalism: Module 7 Ethical Behavior Steps in this module: 1. Learn: Read the following document on ethics. 2. Complete the case study Framework for

More information

Phil 108, August 10, 2010 Punishment

Phil 108, August 10, 2010 Punishment Phil 108, August 10, 2010 Punishment Retributivism and Utilitarianism The retributive theory: (1) It is good in itself that those who have acted wrongly should suffer. When this happens, people get what

More information

I may disappoint some of you when I say that the trolley problem I shall be talking about is not this one hard though it is, even after inspection of

I may disappoint some of you when I say that the trolley problem I shall be talking about is not this one hard though it is, even after inspection of TROLLEY PROBLEMS Bob Stone I may disappoint some of you when I say that the trolley problem I shall be talking about is not this one hard though it is, even after inspection of the area at the edge of

More information

THE HUMAN BODY SWORD KRIS BORER * LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 2, ART. NO. 20 (2010)

THE HUMAN BODY SWORD KRIS BORER * LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 2, ART. NO. 20 (2010) LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 2, ART. NO. 20 (2010) THE HUMAN BODY SWORD KRIS BORER * THE HUMAN BODY SHIELD PROBLEM is the following scenario. A criminal, holding your innocent neighbor in front of him, approaches

More information

So Close, Yet So Far: Why Solutions to the Closeness Problem for the Doctrine of Double Effect Fall Short 1

So Close, Yet So Far: Why Solutions to the Closeness Problem for the Doctrine of Double Effect Fall Short 1 NOÛS 49:2 (2015) 376 409 doi: 10.1111/nous.12033 So Close, Yet So Far: Why Solutions to the Closeness Problem for the Doctrine of Double Effect Fall Short 1 DANA KAY NELKIN University of California, San

More information

Oxford Scholarship Online

Oxford Scholarship Online University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online Moral Dilemmas: and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy Philippa Foot Print publication date: 2002 Print ISBN-13: 9780199252848 Published to Oxford

More information

Against Satisficing Consequentialism BEN BRADLEY. Syracuse University

Against Satisficing Consequentialism BEN BRADLEY. Syracuse University Against Satisficing Consequentialism BEN BRADLEY Syracuse University Abstract: The move to satisficing has been thought to help consequentialists avoid the problem of demandingness. But this is a mistake.

More information

Epistemic Consequentialism, Truth Fairies and Worse Fairies

Epistemic Consequentialism, Truth Fairies and Worse Fairies Philosophia (2017) 45:987 993 DOI 10.1007/s11406-017-9833-0 Epistemic Consequentialism, Truth Fairies and Worse Fairies James Andow 1 Received: 7 October 2015 / Accepted: 27 March 2017 / Published online:

More information

Aristotle and Double Effect

Aristotle and Double Effect Journal of Ancient Philosophy (forthcoming) Aristotle and Double Effect Ezio Di Nucci Universität Duisburg-Essen (ezio.dinucci@uni-due.de) Abstract There are some interesting similarities between Aristotle

More information

Gettiering Goldman. I. Introduction. Kenneth Stalkfleet. Stance Volume

Gettiering Goldman. I. Introduction. Kenneth Stalkfleet. Stance Volume Stance Volume 4 2011 Gettiering Goldman Kenneth Stalkfleet ABSTRACT: This paper examines the causal theory of knowledge put forth by Alvin Goldman in his 1967 paper A Causal Theory of Knowing. Goldman

More information

NOTE ON THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT AND THE DOCTRINE OF ACTS AND OMISSIONS For Philosophy 13 Fall, 2008

NOTE ON THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT AND THE DOCTRINE OF ACTS AND OMISSIONS For Philosophy 13 Fall, 2008 1 NOTE ON THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT AND THE DOCTRINE OF ACTS AND OMISSIONS For Philosophy 13 Fall, 2008 1. THE DOCTRINE OF DOUBLE EFFECT The Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) holds that in some contexts

More information

Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the

Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the Loop Case Forthcoming in Philosophical Psychology S. Matthew Liao (NYU), Alex Wiegmann (Göttingen), Joshua Alexander (Sienna), and Gerard Vong

More information

Act Consequentialism s Compelling Idea and Deontology s Paradoxical Idea

Act Consequentialism s Compelling Idea and Deontology s Paradoxical Idea Professor Douglas W. Portmore Act Consequentialism s Compelling Idea and Deontology s Paradoxical Idea I. Some Terminological Notes Very broadly and nontraditionally construed, act consequentialism is

More information

Hugh LaFollette: The Practice of Ethics

Hugh LaFollette: The Practice of Ethics Soc Choice Welf (2010) 34:497 501 DOI 10.1007/s00355-009-0414-4 BOOK REVIEW Hugh LaFollette: The Practice of Ethics Blackwell, viii, 300 p. ISBN: 0-631-21945-5 Alex Voorhoeve Received: 28 June 2009 / Published

More information

Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York

Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York promoting access to White Rose research papers Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ This is an author produced version of a paper published in Ethical Theory and Moral

More information

The Moral Relevance of the Past (Hanna)

The Moral Relevance of the Past (Hanna) The Moral Relevance of the Past (Hanna) 1. Past Fault: Recall that Quinn says of Rescue IV, given the choice to save 1 or 5, you ought to save 5 UNLESS it is your fault that the 1 is in harm s way. If

More information

The fact that some action, A, is part of a valuable and eligible pattern of action, P, is a reason to perform A. 1

The fact that some action, A, is part of a valuable and eligible pattern of action, P, is a reason to perform A. 1 The Common Structure of Kantianism and Act Consequentialism Christopher Woodard RoME 2009 1. My thesis is that Kantian ethics and Act Consequentialism share a common structure, since both can be well understood

More information

Killing Innocent People

Killing Innocent People Killing Innocent People 1 Introduction Suppose that a soldier is fighting in a war that is just. His unit is about to be attacked by child soldiers who he knows were earlier forcibly abducted from their

More information

ON PROMOTING THE DEAD CERTAIN: A REPLY TO BEHRENDS, DIPAOLO AND SHARADIN

ON PROMOTING THE DEAD CERTAIN: A REPLY TO BEHRENDS, DIPAOLO AND SHARADIN DISCUSSION NOTE ON PROMOTING THE DEAD CERTAIN: A REPLY TO BEHRENDS, DIPAOLO AND SHARADIN BY STEFAN FISCHER JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY DISCUSSION NOTE APRIL 2017 URL: WWW.JESP.ORG COPYRIGHT STEFAN

More information

During the Second World War as V1 rockets rained down on London, Churchill made a fateful decision. He would protect the city center and its vital

During the Second World War as V1 rockets rained down on London, Churchill made a fateful decision. He would protect the city center and its vital The Trolley Problem During the Second World War as V1 rockets rained down on London, Churchill made a fateful decision. He would protect the city center and its vital government and historical buildings

More information

In the Fall PEs many people who wrote about ethics as an Area of Knowledge indicated that ethical perspectives were always a matter of personal

In the Fall PEs many people who wrote about ethics as an Area of Knowledge indicated that ethical perspectives were always a matter of personal Ethics ToK 12 In the Fall PEs many people who wrote about ethics as an Area of Knowledge indicated that ethical perspectives were always a matter of personal perspective. In you notes, answer the following

More information

W.D. Ross ( )

W.D. Ross ( ) W.D. Ross (1877-1971) British philosopher Translator or Aristotle Defends a pluralist theory of morality in his now-classic book The Right and the Good (1930) Big idea: prima facie duties Prima Facie Duties

More information

A Contractualist Reply

A Contractualist Reply A Contractualist Reply The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Scanlon, T. M. 2008. A Contractualist Reply.

More information

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 2 - Introduction to the Normative Ethics of Behavior: 1. What is Normative Ethics? 2. The Normative Ethics of Behavior 3. Moral Principles 4. Fully General Moral Principles

More information

1. LEADER PREPARATION

1. LEADER PREPARATION Genesis: A View From the Beginning Week 5: Choose Correctly (Jacob) This includes: 1. Leader Preparation 2. Lesson Guide 1. LEADER PREPARATION LESSON OVERVIEW This lesson will help students think about

More information

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers Diagram and evaluate each of the following arguments. Arguments with Definitional Premises Altruism. Altruism is the practice of doing something solely because

More information

AN ACTUAL-SEQUENCE THEORY OF PROMOTION

AN ACTUAL-SEQUENCE THEORY OF PROMOTION BY D. JUSTIN COATES JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY DISCUSSION NOTE JANUARY 2014 URL: WWW.JESP.ORG COPYRIGHT D. JUSTIN COATES 2014 An Actual-Sequence Theory of Promotion ACCORDING TO HUMEAN THEORIES,

More information

NOT SO PROMISING AFTER ALL: EVALUATOR-RELATIVE TELEOLOGY AND COMMON-SENSE MORALITY

NOT SO PROMISING AFTER ALL: EVALUATOR-RELATIVE TELEOLOGY AND COMMON-SENSE MORALITY NOT SO PROMISING AFTER ALL: EVALUATOR-RELATIVE TELEOLOGY AND COMMON-SENSE MORALITY by MARK SCHROEDER Abstract: Douglas Portmore has recently argued in this journal for a promising result that combining

More information

If God brought about the Big Bang, did he do that before the Big Bang?

If God brought about the Big Bang, did he do that before the Big Bang? If God brought about the Big Bang, did he do that before the Big Bang? Daniel von Wachter Email: daniel@abc.de replace abc by von-wachter http://von-wachter.de International Academy of Philosophy, Santiago

More information

Living High and Letting Die

Living High and Letting Die Living High and Letting Die Barry Smith and Berit Brogaard (published under the pseudonym: Nicola Bourbaki) Preprint version of paper in Philosophy 76 (2001), 435 442 Thomson s Violinist It s the same,

More information

THE ETHICS OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: WINTER 2009

THE ETHICS OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: WINTER 2009 Lying & Deception Definitions and Discussion Three constructions Do not lie has the special status of a moral law, which means that it is always wrong to lie, no matter what the circumstances. In Kant

More information

A Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS

A Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS A Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS In a recent Black Belt Class, the partners of ProcessGPS had a lively discussion about the topic of hypothesis

More information

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus Class #27 - Finishing Consequentialism Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 Business P Final papers are due on Thursday P Final

More information

Lecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics

Lecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics Lecture 12 Deontology Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics 1 Agenda 1. Immanuel Kant 2. Deontology 3. Hypothetical vs. Categorical Imperatives 4. Formula of the End in Itself 5. Maxims and

More information

Again, the reproductive context has received a lot more attention than the context of the environment and climate change to which I now turn.

Again, the reproductive context has received a lot more attention than the context of the environment and climate change to which I now turn. The ethical issues concerning climate change are very often framed in terms of harm: so people say that our acts (and omissions) affect the environment in ways that will cause severe harm to future generations,

More information

The Perfect Word of God

The Perfect Word of God The Perfect Word of God During His earthly ministry, Jesus gave us many commands. The Bible is the Perfect Word of God. (Today s title) (Sermon Notes) By Warren Zehrung 1/19/2019 The Bible is how God speaks

More information

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology 1. Introduction Ryan C. Smith Philosophy 125W- Final Paper April 24, 2010 Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology Throughout this paper, the goal will be to accomplish three

More information

CHECKING THE NEIGHBORHOOD: A REPLY TO DIPAOLO AND BEHRENDS ON PROMOTION

CHECKING THE NEIGHBORHOOD: A REPLY TO DIPAOLO AND BEHRENDS ON PROMOTION DISCUSSION NOTE CHECKING THE NEIGHBORHOOD: A REPLY TO DIPAOLO AND BEHRENDS ON PROMOTION BY NATHANIEL SHARADIN JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY DISCUSSION NOTE FEBRUARY 2016 Checking the Neighborhood:

More information

Pedro s Significance. Christopher Woodard University of Nottingham, UK. Abstract. The Southern Journal of Philosophy (2009) Vol. X VII. acquiescence.

Pedro s Significance. Christopher Woodard University of Nottingham, UK. Abstract. The Southern Journal of Philosophy (2009) Vol. X VII. acquiescence. The Southern Journal of Philosophy (2009) Vol. X VII University of Nottingham, UK Abstract Williams s famous story of Jim exemplifies a general class of dilemmas caused by recalcitrant agents. Like Williams

More information

THE BASIS OF MORAL LIABILITY TO DEFENSIVE KILLING. Jeff McMahan Rutgers University

THE BASIS OF MORAL LIABILITY TO DEFENSIVE KILLING. Jeff McMahan Rutgers University Philosophical Issues, 15, Normativity, 2005 THE BASIS OF MORAL LIABILITY TO DEFENSIVE KILLING Jeff McMahan Rutgers University There may be circumstances in which it is morally justifiable intentionally

More information

CONSEQUENTIALISM AND THE SELF OTHER ASYMMETRY

CONSEQUENTIALISM AND THE SELF OTHER ASYMMETRY Professor Douglas W. Portmore CONSEQUENTIALISM AND THE SELF OTHER ASYMMETRY I. Consequentialism, Commonsense Morality, and the Self Other Asymmetry Unlike traditional act consequentialism (TAC), commonsense

More information

Kant. Deontological Ethics

Kant. Deontological Ethics Kant 1 Deontological Ethics An action's moral value is determined by the nature of the action itself and the agent's motive DE contrasts with Utilitarianism which says that the goal or consequences of

More information

Deontological Ethics. Kant. Rules for Kant. Right Action

Deontological Ethics. Kant. Rules for Kant. Right Action Deontological Ethics Kant An action's moral value is determined by the nature of the action itself and the agent's motive DE contrasts with Utilitarianism which says that the goal or consequences of an

More information

Chapter 26: Causation And Ethics * ethical concepts, views, and problems. In particular, I discuss the role of causation in the family

Chapter 26: Causation And Ethics * ethical concepts, views, and problems. In particular, I discuss the role of causation in the family Chapter 26: Causation And Ethics * In this article I examine potential applications of the concept of cause to some central ethical concepts, views, and problems. In particular, I discuss the role of causation

More information

Why there is no such thing as a motivating reason

Why there is no such thing as a motivating reason Why there is no such thing as a motivating reason Benjamin Kiesewetter, ENN Meeting in Oslo, 03.11.2016 (ERS) Explanatory reason statement: R is the reason why p. (NRS) Normative reason statement: R is

More information

Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning

Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning The final chapter of Moore and Parker s text is devoted to how we might apply critical reasoning in certain philosophical contexts.

More information

Suppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions

Suppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions Suppose.... Kant You are a good swimmer and one day at the beach you notice someone who is drowning offshore. Consider the following three scenarios. Which one would Kant says exhibits a good will? Even

More information

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule UTILITARIAN ETHICS Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule A dilemma You are a lawyer. You have a client who is an old lady who owns a big house. She tells you that

More information

College Writing: Supporting Your Thesis

College Writing: Supporting Your Thesis College Writing: Supporting Your Thesis You ve written an arguable thesis. Now you ve got to give some evidence to support your claim. Keep in mind our discussion in Formulating an Arguable Thesis, and

More information

Ignorance, Beneficence, and Rights

Ignorance, Beneficence, and Rights Ignorance, Beneficence, and Rights Kieran Setiya MIT May 18, 2018 (Draft; do not cite without permission) The Trolley Problem is the problem of explaining the moral contrast between two hypothetical cases.

More information

Causing People to Exist and Saving People s Lives Jeff McMahan

Causing People to Exist and Saving People s Lives Jeff McMahan Causing People to Exist and Saving People s Lives Jeff McMahan 1 Possible People Suppose that whatever one does a new person will come into existence. But one can determine who this person will be by either

More information