Marx and Nature. A Red and Green Perspective. Paul Burkett

Transcription

1 Marx and Nature A Red and Green Perspective Paul Burkett

2 MARX AND NATURE:A RED AND GREEN PERSPECTIVE Copyright Paul Burkett, 1999.All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. For information, address St. Martin s Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y ISBN ISBN (ebook) DOI / Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Burkett, Paul May 26 Marx and nature : a red and green perspective / Paul Burkett. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Communism and ecology. 2. Marx, Karl I. Title. HX550.E25B dc CIP Design by Letra Libre First edition: February,

3 For My Mother and Father

4 This page intentionally left blank

5 Contents Preface and Acknowledgements Introduction 1 Part I Nature and Historical Materialism 1. Requirements of a Social Ecology Nature, Labor, and Production The Natural Basis of Labor Productivity and Surplus Labor Labor and Labor Power as Natural and Social Forces 49 Part II Nature and Capitalism 5. Nature, Labor, and Capitalist Production Capital s Free Appropriation of Natural and Social Conditions Capitalism and Nature: A Value-Form Approach Reconsidering Some Ecological Criticisms of Marx s Value Analysis Capitalism and Environmental Crisis Marx s Working-Day Analysis and Environmental Crisis 133 Part III Nature and Communism 11. Nature and the Historical Progressivity of Capitalism Nature and Capitalism s Historical Limits Capital, Nature, and Class Struggle Nature and Associated Production 223 Notes 259 References 297 Index 309 vii

6 This page intentionally left blank

7 Preface and Acknowledgements In reconstructing Marx s approach to nature under capitalism and communism, this book responds to three common criticisms of Marx: 1. Marx fell prey to a productivist or Promethean vision under which (a) capitalist development of the productive forces allows human production to completely overcome natural constraints; (b) communism is projected as extending and rationalizing capitalism s drive toward complete human domination over nature; and (c) both capitalism and communism demonstrate an inevitable antagonism between humanity and nature. 2. Marx s analysis of capitalism excludes or downgrades the contribution of nature to production; this applies especially to Marx s labor theory of value. 3. Marx s critique of the contradictions of capitalism has nothing to do with nature or with the natural conditions of production. The primary motivation of this book is to address these three claims and their most common corollaries in systematic, textually informed and politically useful fashion. I will argue that Marx s approach to nature possesses an inner logic, coherence, and analytical power that have not yet been recognized even by ecological Marxists. Over the past several years, when asked about the subject of this work, my answer has normally been: Green and Red. In a way, this response sums up my intellectual debts. I first became interested in environmental issues during my undergraduate days at Kalamazoo College, where in 1977 I wrote a senior thesis entitled An Environmental Economist s Case for Organic Revolution. I want to thank Bob Brownlee and the late Louis Junker for their inspiration and encouragement at that time, which planted the seeds of the Green in the present work.

8 viii Marx and Nature I began seriously studying Marxism while pursuing a graduate economics degree at Syracuse University. This interest was encouraged most of all by the late Jesse Burkhead, an outstanding teacher of the history of economic thought who was a beacon of intellectual openness to many Syracuse graduate students. Given my earlier interests, it was inevitable that I would never see Marxism as an alternative to environmentalism but rather as a particular kind of environmentalism, one that considers people-nature relations from the standpoint of class relations and the requirements of human emancipation. For a number of reasons of a personal, political, and professional nature, however, only recently was I able to investigate this way of thinking in a scholarly fashion. My return to the Green by way of the Red has been greatly helped by John Bellamy Foster, who was kind enough to read and offer comments on the rough notes leading to this book. John has been a constant source of inspiration and encouragement in my work. My gratitude is extended to my colleagues at Indiana State University for granting the leave time needed to finish this book. I also want to thank my immediate family members for putting up with me during the writing of it.thank you, Suzanne, Shaun, Patrick, and Molly. Although I owe much to the above-mentioned individuals, any errors or shortcomings in the book are my responsibility alone. Portions of several chapters have previously appeared in scholarly journals. I thank their respective publishers for permission to reprint from Science & Society, Fall 1996 (Chapter 7); Nature, Society, and Thought, in press (Chapter 9); Monthly Review, in press (Chapter 12); Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, December 1995 (Chapter 13); and Organization & Environment, June 1997 (Chapter 13). Finally, a stylistic note. Many of the passages quoted in this book contain emphasized words and phrases.to avoid cluttering up the presentation with an endless stream of qualifiers, it is simply indicated here that all emphases are in the original unless noted otherwise. Terre Haute, Indiana October, 1998