PHL 214 Environmental Ethics

Transcription

1 PHL 214 Environmental Ethics Instructor: Giulia Mingucci COURSE DESCRIPTION Environmental ethics is the discipline in philosophy that studies the relationship of human beings to the natural environment and its nonhuman contents. The course will provide conceptual resources for thinking about human relationships to the natural world and gaining a better understanding of the challenge of environmental ethics to the anthropocentrism (i.e. human-centeredness) embedded in traditional ethical thinking. No prior experience with philosophy is required. The first section of the course is devoted to an analysis of the cultural and historical roots of today ecological crisis. We will start by exploring two ancient myths of origin which are so deeply embedded in western thought that they crop up almost anytime people speak of nature: the myth of Eden of the biblical tradition (Genesis) and the myth of Prometheus of the ancient Greek tradition (Plato, Aristotle). Then, we will consider the new legitimization of human mastery over nature promoted by modern philosophy and science. Firstly, we will focus on René Decartes mechanism and its consequences on the human practices on natural bodies (animal and human experimentation; biotechnology). Secondly, we will discuss the traditional opposition between the so-called State of Nature and the Civil Society by studying the principal theorists of Contractarianism (Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jeacques Rousseau) and the nineteenth century American myth of wilderness. These topics will force us to discuss our assumptions about what is natural and what is not, and thus to question the opposition between nature and artifice in itself. In the second section of the course, we will turn to a more explicit philosophical debate. We will first explore three classical Western ethical perspectives (Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics) in their application to issues concerning our ethical relationship to the natural environment and its non-human content, and then we will discuss some recent approaches to animal rights (Peter Singer and Tom Regan), biotechnology and human experimentation (Hans Jonas), Land Ethic (Aldo Leopold) and Deep Ecology (Arne Naess). The third section of the course concerns the complex relationship between theory and practice in environmental ethics: practical concerns such as the global climate change and the achievability of an ecological culture will be investigated through the lens of philosophy. COURSE OBJECTIVES The student will be challenged to read and comprehend classical and contemporary philosophical texts, and to learn the conceptual vocabulary and the logical tools to make and evaluate philosophical arguments. At the end of the course the student will become acquainted with concepts and methods of critical moral reflection, will know the lines of the philosophical debate about nature, and will be able to critically orient her/himself on the many ethical and political issues regarding mankind's dealings with the natural environment. COURSE REQUIREMENTS Completion of all major assignments (class participation, tests and papers) are required for passing the class. CLASS PARTICIPATION: 15 % Attendance at all classes is required of all students (see Spring Hill College Italy Center Attendance Policy). In order to receive a high mark for participation, it is required that you read and understand the texts, ask critical questions, and actively participate to debates with your own remarks and arguments. i. During the lecture, I may ask random questions on the assigned readings.

2 ii. In addition, you will be required to submit, at the beginning of each class, a card with a brief comment on the readings listed in bold type (but all the assigned readings are mandatory). In the event a student misses one class, s/he is required to send her/his comment card to giulia.mingucci@gmail.com by the date of the missed class. COMMENT CARDS Please note that the comment card is a very important proof of your diligence and it will be evaluated (CR = credit; NC = no credit). Late cards will count as NC no credit. The required length is 80 (min) 150 (max) words: shorter or longer cards will be marked NC no credit. What to not do: Express your opinion without evidence. For example, you cannot just write: I (don t) like/appreciate/agree withx without any further explanations (arguments, references). What to do: Find the author s main conclusion (thesis) and the reasons (arguments) s/he offers in support of it. Take special notice of any assumptions or ambiguities. Quote correctly the sources. You will be finally in a position to evaluate the author s arguments and express your own (argued!) opinion. * Other helpful indications are provided by Jim Pryor s Guidelines on Reading Philosophy. 4 TESTS (UNANNOUNCED): 10 % EACH Yes/no questions, definitions and short-answer questions about the material we have read and discussed in class. MID-PAPER: 15 % You will be required to write a short paper (length: 400/700 words) on an image (or a text) that exemplifies the idea of nature you wish to discuss in class. You are expected to define the philosophical concepts with references to the required course readings and bibliography. Send your short paper (.doc) to giulia.mingucci@gmail.com. Any homework received past the deadline will automatically be penalized. You will be asked to present and discuss your paper (5 minutes speaking time). FINAL PAPER: 30 % For your final paper, you are required to write a 2000/2500 words essay (word count includes references and footnotes, but excludes bibliography). You may select a topic among the issues analyzed in our course syllabus. Topics need to be discussed in advance with me: send an essay plan (consisting of a provisional title, two-three explanatory sentences, and a rough table of contents) to giulia.mingucci@gmail.comyour proposals will be discussed in class. Send your final paper (.doc) to giulia.mingucci@gmail.com Late papers will be considered under exceptional circumstances but may be marked down one third of a letter grade for each day that they are late. Contact the professor asap (preferably at least 24 hours in advance of the due date) if you think you may need a paper extension with the request and reason for the request. Documentation and college approval may be necessary in certain cases. Essays that are not submitted via by the due date will be considered late unless otherwise stated or other arrangements are made with the professor. PAPERS It is imperative to keep conceptual precision, logical coherence, historical awareness, and to quote correctly the sources. Example of structure*: 1) Introduction: definition of the problem and its terms; 2) Development of the argument(s); 3) Conclusion. A strong final paper will use a minimum of two refereed journal articles and one primary source, including references from the required course readings, readings recommended by the teacher and sources suggested by the student. Please note: Plagiarism will not be tolerated, and will result in a failing grade for your final paper. If you are not sure what counts as plagiarism, please ask me, I shall be happy to help. *Other helpful indications are provided by Jim Pryor s Guidelines on Writing a Philosophical Paper. See also my Guidelines on Editing a Paper. Johns Hopkins SAIS Graduate School Library (via Belmeloro, 11) is a superb library and recent journals, books and academic publications are available for consultation here. You cannot take books out of the SAIS library but you can use them when studying in the library. See The Sala Borsa library (Piazza Nettuno, 3) is part of the University of Bologna, and there are also some books and reviews in English which you may wish to consult or take out on loan. See SPRING HILL COLLEGE ITALY CENTER ATTENDANCE POLICY Attendance at all classes is required of all students. Students are expected to arrive at class on time, having completed the week s course readings and assignments, with a pen, paper and books in-hand. Students are expected to read their daily to keep abreast of important academic and safety related issues. It is the student s responsibility to notify his/her teachers of an anticipated absence, make arrangements to complete the work, and then complete the work as agreed. In the event a student misses more than two classes he/she will automatically be marked down one grade point. A student may be absent two times before being penalized. For example, if a student is excepted to receive a B for a course, but has 2+ unexcused absences on his/her report, the final grade for the course will be dropped to a B-. Excused absences require a note from the Spring Hill medical Doctor (Stephen Williams, M.D.) or from Dr. Todd Waller. Any change in status which will result in absence, the student must contact their professor immediately. It is a student s responsibility to keep him/herself informed of pending strikes, changes in air travel and any other potential obstacles that may

3 prohibit one from being at class on time. Excuses related to travel delays will not be accepted. Examinations missed by reason of absence must be made up at the convenience of the instructor. Students are required to familiarize themselves with the course schedule and should not attempt to make travel plans that may conflict with course meetings, on site visits, and exams. GRADES The college describes grade designations in the Bulletin. Briefly, an A constitutes excellent, truly outstanding scholarship and an unusual degree of intellectual initiative ; a B truly superior or well above average attainment ; a C average or satisfactory work as is done by a majority of students ; and a D deficient, but passed. Grades Chart A = 930 up A- = 900 up B+ = 871 up B = 828 up B- = 785 up C+ = 742 up C = 699 up C- = 656 up D+ = 613 up COURSE SCHEDULE Please note, adjustments to the schedule will be announced in class and/or per . All the assigned readings, due on the date listed, are mandatory. The readings listed in bold type require also a brief comment (comment card). * P indicates a primary source, i.e. a first-hand testimony, and S a secondary source, i.e. a reading about the primary source. #1 Introduction Outline of the course. No required readings. Recommended: Jim Pryor, Philosophical Terms and Methods and Guidelines on Reading Philosophy. SECTION 1: CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL ROOTS #2 Ecological Crisis and Anthropocentrism: Lynn White [P] Lynn White, The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis, in Science, 155, 1967: #3 Ancient Myths of Origin: The Garden of Eden [P] Genesis: 1-3. [S] Carolyn Merchant, Reinventing Eden: The Fate of Nature in Western Culture, New York-London: Routledge, 2004: Ch. 2 ( The Fall from Eden ): 11-20, #4 Ancient Myths of Origin: Prometheus [P] Plato, Protagoras, 320c8-322d5. [S] Richard Kraut, Plato, SEP entry: selection. [S] Paul Woodruff, Plato's Shorter Ethical Works, SEP entry: selection. [P] Aristotle, Parts of Animals IV 10, 687a3-b22; Politics I 2, 1252a a39. [S] Jonathan Barnes, Aristotle: A Very Short Introduction, New York, Oxford University Press, 2000: Ch. 1 ( The Man and His Work ), Ch. 2 ( A Public Figure ), Ch. 17 ( Teleology ), Ch. 18 ( Practical Philosophy ). #5 Modern Attitudes towards Nature: René Descartes Mechanism [P] René Descartes, Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducing the Reason, and Seeking Truth in the Sciences (1637): ,

4 [S] John Cottingham, Descartes, Oxford, Blackwell, 1986: 1-3, 8-19, #6 Descartes Mechanism in Practice: Animal and Human Experimentation [P] Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus (1818): Ch. 4. [S] Andreas-Holger Maehle and Ulrich Tröhler, Animal Experimentation from Antiquity to the End of the Eighteenth Century: Attitudes and Arguments, in N.A. Rupke (ed.), Vivisection in Historical Perspective, London and New York, Croom Helm, 1990: [S] David Cooper, The Frankensteinian Nature of Biotechnology, in A.-H. Maehle and J. Geyer-Kordesch (eds.), Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on Biomedical Ethics: From Paternalism to Autonomy?, Aldershot and Burlington, Ashgate, 2002: #7 Exit from the State of Nature: The Contractarians Foundation of Civil State [P] Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan: [S] Thomas Hobbes Biography, in ibidem. [P] John Locke, Two Treatises of Government: Essay Two, Concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government: , [S] John Locke s Biography, in Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, s.v. #8 Escaping Civilization: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Primitivism [P] Jean-Jacques Rousseau, A Discourse upon the Origin and the Foundation of the Inequality among Mankind (1755): 23-25, [S] Jean-Jacques Rousseau s Biography, in ibidem. #9 Nature and the Feeling of Sublime [P] Edmund Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757): selection. [P] Immanuel Kant, Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764): [S] Immanuel Kant s Biography, in ibidem, pp. xxxvi-xxxvii. #10 The Myth of Wilderness [S] William Cronon, The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature, in Id. (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, New York, W.W. Norton & Company, 1995: #11 Nature as Wilderness: The Experience [P] Henry David Thoreau, Walden (1854); Walking (1861): selection. [P] Sean Penn, Into the Wild, 2007 [DVDs available at SHC Library]. MID-PAPER (PAPER DISCUSSION) Find an image or a text that would force us to question our assumptions about nature and how we should relate to it*. Write a Short Paper on the found object you chose, with your personal comments and the philosophical concepts related to it. Length: 400 (min) (max) words (word count includes references and footnotes, but excludes Bibliography). Send your short paper to giulia.mingucci@gmail.com. Any homework received past the deadline will automatically be penalized. You will present and discuss your paper (5 minutes speaking time). * For some examples of found objects, see William Cronon (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, New York, W.W. Norton & Company, 1995: 59, , 443. #12 Found Objects Discussion Each student will present his/her short paper (5 minutes speaking time) on the found object chosen. SECTION 2: PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE # 13

5 Classical Approaches to Ethics and the Environment: Utilitarianism [P] Jeremy Bentham, Introduction to the Principles of Moral and Legislation (1789): 6-9; (footnote). [S] Jeremy Bentham s Biography in Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, s.v. #14 Classical Approaches to Ethics and the Environment: Kantian Ethics [S] Robert Johnson, Kant s Moral Philosophy, SEP entry: selection. [P] Immanuel Kant, The Critique of Practical Reason (1788): Conclusion. [P] Immanuel Kant, Duties to Animals are Indirect ( ), in Id., Lectures on Ethics Duties Towards Animals and Other Spirits: #15 Classical Approaches to Ethics and the Environment: Virtue Ethics [P] Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics II 1-2, 1103a b3. [S] Marion Hourdequin, Environmental Ethics: From Theory to Practice, New York, Bloomsbury, 2015: Ch. 2 ( Virtue Ethics and the Environment ): #16 Animal Rights [P] Peter Singer, All Animals are Equal (1989), in T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall: [P] Tom Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (1985), in P. Singer (ed.), In Defense of Animals, New York, Basil Blackwell: #17 Responsibility to Nature and Future Generations [P] Hans Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility (1979): [P] Hans Jonas, Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects (1969), in Daedalus, 98(2), 1969: #18 Land Ethic & Deep Ecology Movement [P] Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac (1949): selection. [P] Arne Næss, The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement, in Inquiry, 16, 1973: FINAL PAPER TOPIC (PROPOSAL DISCUSSION) Select a topic among the issues analyzed in our course syllabus *. Write an Essay Plan consisting of a provisional title, two-three explanatory sentences, and a rough table of contents. Send your essay plan to giulia.mingucci@gmail.com. Your proposal will be discussed in class * See the Course Reading List at the beginning of your course reader. #19 Final Paper Topics: Proposals and Discussion SECTION 3: ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS IN PRACTICE #20 Global Climate Change [S] Marion Hourdequin, Environmental Ethics: From Theory to Practice, New York, Bloomsbury, 2015: Ch. 6 ( Global Climate Change ): #21 Ecological Culture [S] Marion Hourdequin, Environmental Ethics: From Theory to Practice, New York, Bloomsbury, 2015: Ch. 8 ( Engaging Environmental Concern, Promoting Change ): #22 Conclusions FINAL PAPER DUE

6