Unit 4. The Problem of Personal Identity
|
|
- Hugh Fields
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Unit 4 The Problem of Personal Identity
2 Key Questions Where does your identity come from? Is there an enduring self that remains the same over time? What is the basis for claiming the existence of an enduring self?
3 Elderly killer thought experiment Elderly Murderer Activity Consider the following situation: 50 years ago John Smith committed a horrific crime when he was 14. John was an angry young man who resented the world and hated most people. He was a failure in school and had been convicted of several minor crimes while still in his early teens. He was accused of murdering four people who taunted him because of his diminutive size. At 14 he was convicted of first degree murder. The evidence showed that he meticulously planned the murders and arranged so that his victims would suffer before they died (he essentially tortured them). At the time, the state had no death penalty on the books, so John was sentenced to the maximum penalty allowed by law - life in prison without possibility of parole. John at first had a hard time adjusting to prison life. In his first five years of incarceration he was involved in three fights, one of which permanently disabled another inmate. During this time, John used the prison weight room and exercise facilities to build himself up. Within three years, John went from a man who weighed barely 120 pounds who would bench press only 30 pounds to a muscle bound person weighing 210 pounds who could bench press nearly 300 pounds. Eventually, John earned his high school equivalency degree and began taking classes (in prison) from the local community college. It was in one of these classes, while John was in his mid twenties, that he met professor Xavier. Professor Xavier taught introduction to philosophy and was also a minister in a local church. John did well in professor Xavier s class and the two men struck up a friendship. During non-school related visits that professor Xavier made to the prison, he gave John a Bible and encouraged him to read it. John did and on his thirtieth birthday John converted to Christianity. Encouraged by professor Xavier, John enrolled in the four year degree program offered at the prison from the local state university. After three years, John graduated with a BA in philosophy with highest honors from the university. Following graduation, John enrolled in an on-line program to earn is legal doctorate. When he was 40, John earned his JD and passed the state bar exam. For the next 10 years, he worked (from within prison) with a legal defense organization that re-examined death penalty cases that had been decided on the basis of faulty evidence and fraud. When he was 52, John published a book on legal ethics. In the next few years he became a well know authority in that field. From the time he was 18 until today, John has been a model prisoner and a roll model to younger inmates. For the past five years John has operated a prison ministry which focuses on the need for prisoners to develop the same love and acceptance of others that John himself models on a daily basis.
4 Elderly killer thought experiment John has recently filed a motion to be paroled. You are on the parole board. Will you grant the motion or not? What is your basis for accepting or rejecting the motion? Please be specific. 2. Consider the question above but compress the events into a ten year timeline. The story begins when John is 14 and ends when he is 24. Does this change your decision, and if so how? 3. Consider the question above, but change John s age at the time the crime was committed to 20. Adjust all other events accordingly. Does this change your decision, and if so why? 4.Consider the question above but change the following. John was born and raised in the Smith tribe, an indigenous people who live in a warm part of Western Antarctica. In the Smith tribe, horrific ritual murder is celebrated at a passage to manhood. All cultural value and the notion of right and wrong are shaped by this belief and Smith children are raised from an early age to believe that becoming an independent adult means participating in a ritual murder. John lives with the Smith people until he is 14, then moves to the US. All other aspects of the story remain the same 5.Consider the question above, but with the following changes. Shortly after John entered prison he was beaten severely in a prison fight. During this fight he lost consciousness and was in a coma for three weeks. When he came out of the coma he had lost all memory of his life prior to awakening. John will never regain any of these lost memories (stipulated). John s prison record is exemplary for the next five years and he applies for parole when he is Consider the situation above but with the following changes. Shortly after his murderous rampage John had a stroke which rendered him brain dead. Surgeons were able to transplant the brain of one of John s victims into his body so that he would survive. John s prison record is exemplary for the next five years and he applies for parole when he is Consider the situation above with the following changes. John had a perfectly normal and happy childhood. He fell asleep one nights and while sleeping went out and committed the horrible murders. When he awoke he had no memory of what he had done, nor would he ever acquire those memories (stipulated). John s prison record is exemplary for the next five years and he applies for parole when he is 20.
5 Theories Substance stuff theories Psychic continuity - Locke Illusion theory - Hume Self as social construction
6 Body Theory =
7 Soul theory
8 Psychic continuity theory Our self awareness is our consciousness If man is a living body, an animal of a certain shape, then what is a person? A person is an intelligent thinking being that can know itself as itself the same thinking thing in different times and places. (accessed at The continuity of our consciousness is the defining characteristic of the self... Since consciousness always accompanies thinking, and it is that which makes every one to be what he calls self, and thereby distinguishes himself from all other thinking things, in this alone consists personal identity, i.e. the sameness of a rational being: and as far as this consciousness can be extended backwards to any past action or thought, so far reaches the identity of that person; it is the same self now it was then; and it is by the same self with this present one that now reflects on it, that that action was done (A) The modern formulation of this theory originates from the English philosopher John Locke ( ) Locke discussed the nature of personal identity in his Essay Concerning Human Understanding In making his argument, Locke distinguishes between the man and the person. The SEP describes this distinction as follows: If man is a living body, an animal of a certain shape, then what is a person? A person is an intelligent thinking being that can know itself as itself the same thinking thing in different times and places. In this essay, Locke argues that the self awareness described above constitutes our Consciousness and this consciousness and its continuity is what constitutes the self. Locke responds to the body theory of personal identity by arguing that physical parts of the body would not be considered the self (or the person) unless they are united with the consciousness: Locke argues that it is this contiguity of consciousness that forms the legal definition of persons according to our legal systems Locke demonstrates the logic of this concept of personal identity in his famous thought experiment of the Prince and the Cobbler. In this experiment, the mind of a prince is magically inserted into the body of a cobbler. In this case, locke argues, the person with the cobbler s appearance is the prince, and that only his body, not his personal identity, has changed. A corollary to Locke s concept of personal identity is his idea that the human mind at birth is a blank slate or tabula rasa. In Locke's philosophy, tabula rasa was the theory that the (human) mind is at birth a "blank slate" without rules for processing data, and that data is added and rules for processing are formed solely by one's sensory experiences. The notion is central to Lockean empiricism. As understood by Locke, tabula rasa meant that the mind of the individual was born "blank", and it also emphasized the individual's freedom to author his or her own soul. Each individual was free to define the content of his or her character - but his or her basic identity as a member of the human species cannot be so altered. It is from this presumption of a free, self-authored mind combined with an immutable human nature that the Lockean doctrine of "natural" rights derives. (Wikipedia) Tabula rasa has implications for discussions of free will and also for questions of group identity (think about how Locke might address the question of gender and racial identity.) To sum up then, Personal identity is defined by the continuity of our consciousness. Persons are the same so long as they possess the continuous collection of memories of conscious states.
9 Psychic continuity theory Locke rejects body theory because the physical parts of the body are not considered the self unless they are united with the consciousness Self depends on consciousness, not on substance....thus every one finds that, whilst comprehended under that consciousness, the little finger is as much a part of himself as what is most so. Upon separation of this little finger, should this consciousness go along with the little finger, and leave the rest of the body, it is evident the little finger would be the person, the same person; and self then would have nothing to do with the rest of the body (B). Responsibility is thus bound to consciousness not the body Persons, not substances, the objects of reward and punishment. In this personal identity is founded all the right and justice of reward and punishment... (C)
10 Terri Schiavo Left to right. All accessed on
11 Problems for psychic continuity theory Reid s degradation of memories objection (described well here) A = B = C A = B, B = C A = C The Scottish Philosopher Thomas Reid ( ) argues that the memory theory of personal identity because our memories over time degrade. On p. 184 of Rauhut the example is given of a boy(y) Who becomes a soldier in adulthood (M) and a general in his old age (G). While G remembers M and M remembers Y, G does not remember Y which seems logically inconsistent. This problem is remedied by the idea of Indirect memories -memories that I cannot recall at this moment, but that a previous version of myself was able to remember directly. Thus to fix this problem we must alter the memory theory to say that to be the same person, one must have at least an indirect memory link to his former self
12 Problems for psychic continuity theory False memories Who am I when I am not conscious? What about babies? What about people in vegetative states? False Memories - Memories that I have that are not true - but that I remember clearly and shape who I am. Yet another problem is the fact that there are some instances in my life where I do not have direct or indirect memories - like when I was asleep last night. It seems absurd to say that the person slumbering in my bed was not me, but the person who woke up this morning was me. A further problem arises with the idea of change over time. We radically change as people over time and yet the memory theory says we are still the same person. This seems contradictory. Thus the argument is that we are the same person not only if we remember the past, but also retain some of the psychological characteristics of our past selves. (memory thus becomes a necessary but not sufficient condition for identity) Lefty and righty - What if one hemisphere of your brain is transplanted into one head and the other into a second. Both have your memories, but which is you? By the Psychological approach both are, but this is a logical contradiction because two things with separate existences cannot be identical to one thing. (from the SEP) The Human animal problem - We start and often end life as entities with no memories or awarenesses. Does this mean that the embryo us and the vegetative state us is not actually us are actual not us because they lack the memory connection necessary for consistent personal identity?
13 The Self as a Social Construction 1. Is it possible to be a self made person? Discuss your answer within your groups using specific examples where possible. 2. Is individualism a social construct? If so, what factors in our society push us in this direction? 3. Solomon (the author of the article) argues that until modern times, our idea of individualism would have ben unintelligible. Why might this be the case? 4. Can you think of a value you hold that is not asocial construct? 5. How has modern technology impacted our definition of the self? Provide specific examples if possible A corollary to Locke s concept of personal identity is his idea that the human mind at birth is a blank slate or tabula rasa. In Locke's philosophy, tabula rasa was the theory that the (human) mind is at birth a "blank slate" without rules for processing data, and that data is added and rules for processing are formed solely by one's sensory experiences. The notion is central to Lockean empiricism. As understood by Locke, tabula rasa meant that the mind of the individual was born "blank", and it also emphasized the individual's freedom to author his or her own soul. Each individual was free to define the content of his or her character - but his or her basic identity as a member of the human species cannot be so altered. It is from this presumption of a free, self-authored mind combined with an immutable human nature that the Lockean doctrine of "natural" rights derives. (Wikipedia) This reinforces an autonomous, self created self. 20th century theories would challenge this.
14 Charles Taylor My identity is defined by the commitments and identifications which provide the frame or horizon within which I can try to determine from case to case what is good, or valuable, or what ought to be done, or what I endorse or oppose. In other words, it is the horizon within which I am capable of taking a stand Accessed on at George Herbert Mead The self, as that which can be an object to itself, is essentially a social structure, and it arises in social experience. After a self has arisen, it in a certain sense provides for itself its social experiences, and so we can conceive of an absolutely solitary self. But it is impossible to conceive of a self arising outside of social experience.accessed on at pubs2/mindself/mead_1934_18.html The Self as a Social Construction A corollary to Locke s concept of personal identity is his idea that the human mind at birth is a blank slate or tabula rasa. In Locke's philosophy, tabula rasa was the theory that the (human) mind is at birth a "blank slate" without rules for processing data, and that data is added and rules for processing are formed solely by one's sensory experiences. The notion is central to Lockean empiricism. As understood by Locke, tabula rasa meant that the mind of the individual was born "blank", and it also emphasized the individual's freedom to author his or her own soul. Each individual was free to define the content of his or her character - but his or her basic identity as a member of the human species cannot be so altered. It is from this presumption of a free, self-authored mind combined with an immutable human nature that the Lockean doctrine of "natural" rights derives. (Wikipedia) This reinforces an autonomous, self created self. 20th century theories would challenge this.
15 Arguments for Social Construction Value judgements arise from social context Self relies on thought, which depends on language, which is learned socially Our significance lies in connection to community (Marx, Hegel, Heidegger from Solomon article)
16 David Hume and the Illusion of an enduring self There is nothing that constitutes an constant and enduring self Bundle Theory - An object consists of its properties - nothing more When we introspect, we find that our consciousness is simply a bundle of rapidly changing impressions - memories, thoughts, images etc. Illusion Theory Hume described what he called the Bundle Theory in his Treatise on Human Nature published in 1739 According to bundle theory, an object consists of its properties and nothing more There neither can there be an object without properties nor can one even conceive of such an object For example, bundle theory claims that thinking of a pencil compels one also to think of its use, its shape, the smell of the wood when it is sharpened, its color, the softness of the eraser, etc. Thus, the theory asserts that the pencil is no more than the collection of its properties. Specifically, there is no substance in which the properties inhere - there is no essential pencil (in the Platonic sense) In a sense - the word pencil is simply shorthand for a collection of properties. Applying this idea to people, Hume reasons that when we turn inward and examine our own consciousness - we find only experience - memories, thoughts, images etc. The self, according to Bundle Theory, is nothing more than the collection of these experiences at any one particular time. (#1 from the document) Thus we are justified in believing that there are experiences, but not that there is a continuing experiencer - any more than the idea that there is an pencil separate from the collection of its properties. (highlight #2) Put another way, we have no reason to believe that there is anything persisting through time that underlies or unifies these experiences. Just experiences - nothing more. (#2 from the document) Instead of persons we have in Hume s words - Bundles of Ideas Another aspect of the Illusion theory of persons is the idea of continuous change As the text indicates, the Greek philosopher Heraclitus reasoned that It is not possible to step twice into the same river. William James ( American philosopher and psychologist)used the river as an analogy to our consciousness, arguing that our consciousness is like a river - never the same thing twice
17 I may venture to affirm of the rest of mankind, that they are nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement. Our eyes cannot turn in their sockets without varying our perceptions. Our thought is still more variable than our sight; and all our other senses and faculties contribute to this change; nor is there any single power of the soul, which remains unalterably the same, perhaps for one moment (top 2).
18 David Hume and the Illusion of an enduring self The self is then nothing more than a collection of these experiences at any one particular time Thus there is experience, but not a persisting experiencer The self is thus a convenient grammatical construction that has no existence in reality Illusion Theory Hume described what he called the Bundle Theory in his Treatise on Human Nature published in 1739 According to bundle theory, an object consists of its properties and nothing more There neither can there be an object without properties nor can one even conceive of such an object For example, bundle theory claims that thinking of a pencil compels one also to think of its use, its shape, the smell of the wood when it is sharpened, its color, the softness of the eraser, etc. Thus, the theory asserts that the pencil is no more than the collection of its properties. Specifically, there is no substance in which the properties inhere - there is no essential pencil (in the Platonic sense) In a sense - the word pencil is simply shorthand for a collection of properties. Applying this idea to people, Hume reasons that when we turn inward and examine our own consciousness - we find only experience - memories, thoughts, images etc. The self, according to Bundle Theory, is nothing more than the collection of these experiences at any one particular time. (#1 from the document) Thus we are justified in believing that there are experiences, but not that there is a continuing experiencer - any more than the idea that there is an pencil separate from the collection of its properties. (highlight #2) Put another way, we have no reason to believe that there is anything persisting through time that underlies or unifies these experiences. Just experiences - nothing more. (#2 from the document) Instead of persons we have in Hume s words - Bundles of Ideas Another aspect of the Illusion theory of persons is the idea of continuous change As the text indicates, the Greek philosopher Heraclitus reasoned that It is not possible to step twice into the same river. William James ( American philosopher and psychologist)used the river as an analogy to our consciousness, arguing that our consciousness is like a river - never the same thing twice
19 The identity, which we ascribe to the mind of man, is only a fictitious one, and of a like kind with that which we ascribe to vegetables and animal bodies. It cannot, therefore, have a different origin, but must proceed from a like operation of the imagination upon like objects (4)
20 The whole of this doctrine leads us to a conclusion, which is of great importance in the present affair, viz. that all the nice and subtile questions concerning personal identity can never possibly be decided, and are to be regarded rather as grammatical than as philosophical difficulties... All the disputes concerning the identity of connected objects are merely verbal, except so far as the relation of parts gives rise to some fiction or imaginary principle of union, as we have already observed.
21 Heraclitus ( BCE) It is not possible to step twice into the same river... it scatters and again comes together, and approaches and recedes
22 The Illusionary Self and Buddhism Key Buddhist Concepts (from the Four Noble Truths) 1. Life is suffering 2. Suffering is caused by desire 3. To end suffering end desire Accessed on at
23 Accessed on at But what is the nature of desire? We desire stability, solidity and permanence But, The doctrine of anicca holds that: All of existence is in a constant state of change - nothing is permanent or unchanging. And anatta insists on The denial of a permanent self, as well as the refusal to treat persons as referring to anything real and permanent (accessed on at Thus to avoid suffering we must acknowledge that everything, even the self, is impermanent and ever changing
24 Accessed on at Regard this phantom world As a star at dawn, a bubble in the stream, a flash of lightning in a summer cloud a flickering lamp - a phantom- and a dream From Houston Smith World Religions Accessed on at
25 Problems for illusion theory It violates our practical notions - we act today on the assumption that we will be in the future. Why are you in this class? Punishment makes little sense if this theory is correct - why shouldn't the elderly killer go free - he is a different person from the person who killed. But... There is no logical contradiction in illusion theory!
26 Hume on the Problems of Locke s memory theory V. For how few of our past actions are there, of which we have any memory? Who can tell me, for instance, what were his thoughts and actions on the 1st of January 1715, the 11th of March 1719, and the 3rd of August 1733? Or will he affirm, because he has entirely forgot the incidents of these days, that the present self is not the same person with the self of that time; and by that means overturn all the most established notions of personal identity? In this view, therefore, memory does not so much produce as discover personal identity, by shewing us the relation of cause and effect among our different perceptions. Illusion Theory Hume described what he called the Bundle Theory in his Treatise on Human Nature published in 1739 According to bundle theory, an object consists of its properties and nothing more There neither can there be an object without properties nor can one even conceive of such an object For example, bundle theory claims that thinking of a pencil compels one also to think of its use, its shape, the smell of the wood when it is sharpened, its color, the softness of the eraser, etc. Thus, the theory asserts that the pencil is no more than the collection of its properties. Specifically, there is no substance in which the properties inhere - there is no essential pencil (in the Platonic sense) In a sense - the word pencil is simply shorthand for a collection of properties. Applying this idea to people, Hume reasons that when we turn inward and examine our own consciousness - we find only experience - memories, thoughts, images etc. The self, according to Bundle Theory, is nothing more than the collection of these experiences at any one particular time. (#1 from the document) Thus we are justified in believing that there are experiences, but not that there is a continuing experiencer - any more than the idea that there is an pencil separate from the collection of its properties. (highlight #2) Put another way, we have no reason to believe that there is anything persisting through time that underlies or unifies these experiences. Just experiences - nothing more. (#2 from the document) Instead of persons we have in Hume s words - Bundles of Ideas Another aspect of the Illusion theory of persons is the idea of continuous change As the text indicates, the Greek philosopher Heraclitus reasoned that It is not possible to step twice into the same river. William James ( American philosopher and psychologist)used the river as an analogy to our consciousness, arguing that our consciousness is like a river - never the same thing twice
The Critique of Berkeley and Hume. Sunday, April 19, 2015
The Critique of Berkeley and Hume George Berkeley (1685-1753) Idealism best defense of common sense against skepticism Descartes s and Locke s ideas of objects make no sense. Attack on primary qualities
More informationNotes on Hume and Kant
Notes on Hume and Kant Daniel Bonevac, The University of Texas at Austin 1 Hume on Identity Hume, an empiricist, asks the question that his philosophical stance demands: nor have we any idea of self, after
More informationThomas Reid on personal identity
Thomas Reid on personal identity phil 20208 Jeff Speaks October 5, 2006 1 Identity and personal identity............................ 1 1.1 The conviction of personal identity..................... 1 1.2
More informationMan Has No Identical Self
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Man Has No Identical Self by David Hume There are some philosophers who imagine we are every
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 4b Free Will/Self
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 4b Free Will/Self The unobservability of the self David Hume, the Scottish empiricist we met in connection with his critique of Descartes method of doubt, is very skeptical
More informationTo be able to define human nature and psychological egoism. To explain how our views of human nature influence our relationships with other
Velasquez, Philosophy TRACK 1: CHAPTER REVIEW CHAPTER 2: Human Nature 2.1: Why Does Your View of Human Nature Matter? Learning objectives: To be able to define human nature and psychological egoism To
More informationThe British Empiricism
The British Empiricism Locke, Berkeley and Hume copyleft: nicolazuin.2018 nowxhere.wordpress.com The terrible heritage of Descartes: Skepticism, Empiricism, Rationalism The problem originates from the
More informationReid Against Skepticism
Thus we see, that Descartes and Locke take the road that leads to skepticism without knowing the end of it, but they stop short for want of light to carry them farther. Berkeley, frightened at the appearance
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationChapter 16 George Berkeley s Immaterialism and Subjective Idealism
Chapter 16 George Berkeley s Immaterialism and Subjective Idealism Key Words Immaterialism, esse est percipi, material substance, sense data, skepticism, primary quality, secondary quality, substratum
More informationThe CopernicanRevolution
Immanuel Kant: The Copernican Revolution The CopernicanRevolution Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is Kant s best known work. In this monumental work, he begins a Copernican-like
More informationBerkeley, Three dialogues between Hylas and Philonous focus on p. 86 (chapter 9) to the end (p. 93).
TOPIC: Lecture 7.2 Berkeley Lecture Berkeley will discuss why we only have access to our sense-data, rather than the real world. He will then explain why we can trust our senses. He gives an argument for
More information1/8. Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God
1/8 Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God Descartes opens the Third Meditation by reminding himself that nothing that is purely sensory is reliable. The one thing that is certain is the cogito. He
More informationClass #13 - The Consciousness Theory of the Self Locke, The Prince and the Cobbler Reid, Of Mr. Locke's Account of Our Personal Identity
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2012 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #13 - The Consciousness Theory of the Self Locke, The Prince and the Cobbler Reid, Of Mr. Locke's Account of
More informationAnicca, Anatta and Interbeing The Coming and Going in the Ocean of Karma
Anicca, Anatta and Interbeing The Coming and Going in the Ocean of Karma Three Marks of Existence 1. Discontent (dukkha or duhkha) 2. Impermanence (anicca or anitya) 3. No self (anatta or anatman) Impermanence
More informationOf Identity and Diversity *
Of Identity and Diversity * John Locke 9. Personal Identity [T]o find wherein personal identity consists, we must consider what person stands for;- which, I think, is a thinking intelligent being, that
More informationEvery simple idea has a simple impression, which resembles it; and every simple impression a correspondent idea
'Every simple idea has a simple impression, which resembles it; and every simple impression a correspondent idea' (Treatise, Book I, Part I, Section I). What defence does Hume give of this principle and
More informationGREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid ( ) Peter West 25/09/18
GREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid (1710-1796) Peter West 25/09/18 Some context Aristotle (384-322 BCE) Lucretius (c. 99-55 BCE) Thomas Reid (1710-1796 AD) 400 BCE 0 Much of (Western) scholastic philosophy
More informationLocke s Essay, Book II, Chapter 27: Of Identity and Diversity
Locke s Essay, Book II, Chapter 27: Of Identity and Diversity 1. Wherein identity consists In this section Locke is distinguishing two different kinds of identity: 1: Numerical identity (Fred is identical
More informationDoes God exist? The argument from miracles
Does God exist? The argument from miracles We ve now discussed three of the central arguments for the existence of God. Beginning today, we will examine the case against belief in God. Next time, we ll
More informationThe Soul in Locke, Butler, Reid, Hume, and Kant
Chapter 4 The Soul in Locke, Butler, Reid, Hume, and Kant In the Introduction to their book Naturalization of the Soul: Self and Personal Identity in the Eighteenth Century, Raymond Martin and John Barresi
More informationA History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do. Summer 2016 Ross Arnold
A History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do Summer 2016 Ross Arnold A History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do Videos of lectures available at: www.litchapala.org under 8-Week
More informationKant and his Successors
Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics
More informationLecture 7.1 Berkeley I
TOPIC: Lecture 7.1 Berkeley I Introduction to the Representational view of the mind. Berkeley s Argument from Illusion. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Idealism. Naive realism. Representations. Berkeley s Argument from
More informationBertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1
Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1 Analysis 46 Philosophical grammar can shed light on philosophical questions. Grammatical differences can be used as a source of discovery and a guide
More informationJohn Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
John Locke An Essay Concerning Human Understanding From Rationalism to Empiricism Empiricism vs. Rationalism Empiricism: All knowledge ultimately rests upon sense experience. All justification (our reasons
More informationChapter 5: Freedom and Determinism
Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism At each time t the world is perfectly determinate in all detail. - Let us grant this for the sake of argument. We might want to re-visit this perfectly reasonable assumption
More informationFrom Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
More informationChapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge
Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the
More information1/8. Reid on Common Sense
1/8 Reid on Common Sense Thomas Reid s work An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense is self-consciously written in opposition to a lot of the principles that animated early modern
More informationContents EMPIRICISM. Logical Atomism and the beginnings of pluralist empiricism. Recap: Russell s reductionism: from maths to physics
Contents EMPIRICISM PHIL3072, ANU, 2015 Jason Grossman http://empiricism.xeny.net lecture 9: 22 September Recap Bertrand Russell: reductionism in physics Common sense is self-refuting Acquaintance versus
More informationCONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT DIALOGUE SEARLE AND BUDDHISM ON THE NON-SELF SORAJ HONGLADAROM
Comparative Philosophy Volume 8, No. 1 (2017): 94-99 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT DIALOGUE SEARLE AND BUDDHISM ON THE NON-SELF SORAJ ABSTRACT: In this
More informationDo you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014
Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationTeleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?
1. Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 2. Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationA History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do. Summer 2016 Ross Arnold
A History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do Summer 2016 Ross Arnold A History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do Videos of lectures available at: www.litchapala.org under 8-Week
More informationWhy There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics
Davis 1 Why There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics William Davis Red River Undergraduate Philosophy Conference North Dakota State University
More informationThere are three tools you can use:
Slide 1: What the Buddha Thought How can we know if something we read or hear about Buddhism really reflects the Buddha s own teachings? There are three tools you can use: Slide 2: 1. When delivering his
More informationHume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge
Hume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge in class. Let my try one more time to make clear the ideas we discussed today Ideas and Impressions First off, Hume, like Descartes, Locke, and Berkeley, believes
More informationEXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers
EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers Diagram and evaluate each of the following arguments. Arguments with Definitional Premises Altruism. Altruism is the practice of doing something solely because
More informationFree Will and Determinism
Free Will and Determinism Soft determinism you are free to a certain extent, therefore you are still responsible for your choices. Hard determinism humans are controlled by external forces and have no
More informationOf Cause and Effect David Hume
Of Cause and Effect David Hume Of Probability; And of the Idea of Cause and Effect This is all I think necessary to observe concerning those four relations, which are the foundation of science; but as
More informationImportant dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )
PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since 1600 Dr. Peter Assmann Spring 2018 Important dates Feb 14 Term paper draft due Upload paper to E-Learning https://elearning.utdallas.edu
More informationWhat does it mean if we assume the world is in principle intelligible?
REASONS AND CAUSES The issue The classic distinction, or at least the one we are familiar with from empiricism is that causes are in the world and reasons are some sort of mental or conceptual thing. I
More informationCONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2
CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2 1 THE ISSUES: REVIEW Is the death penalty (capital punishment) justifiable in principle? Why or why not? Is the death penalty justifiable
More informationTheory of Knowledge Series
Online Free Resources Theory of Knowledge Series Ways of Knowing info@lanternaeducation.com www.lanternaeducation.com What are Ways of Knowing? Ways of Knowledge All knowledge comes from somewhere. Even
More informationThomas Reid, An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense (1764)
7 Thomas Reid, An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense (1764) It is fair to say that Thomas Reid's philosophy took its starting point from that of David Hume, whom he knew and
More informationEpistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?
Epistemology a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (Dictionary.com v 1.1). Epistemology attempts to answer the question how do we know what
More informationHume. Hume the Empiricist. Judgments about the World. Impressions as Content of the Mind. The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World
Hume Hume the Empiricist The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World As an empiricist, Hume thinks that all knowledge of the world comes from sense experience If all we can know comes from
More informationHume s emotivism. Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Hume s emotivism Theories of what morality is fall into two broad families cognitivism and noncognitivism. The distinction is now understood by philosophers to depend on whether one thinks
More informationTrinity & contradiction
Trinity & contradiction Today we ll discuss one of the most distinctive, and philosophically most problematic, Christian doctrines: the doctrine of the Trinity. It is tempting to see the doctrine of the
More informationWhen does human life begin? by Dr Brigid Vout
When does human life begin? by Dr Brigid Vout The question of when human life begins has occupied the minds of people throughout human history, and perhaps today more so than ever. Fortunately, developments
More informationChapter 2 Human Nature
True / False 1. Freud wrote Civilization and Its Discontents. 2. Hobbes believed that humans were altruistic. ANSWER: False 3. J. J. C. Smart argued that states of consciousness are identical with states
More informationTHE MORAL ARGUMENT. Peter van Inwagen. Introduction, James Petrik
THE MORAL ARGUMENT Peter van Inwagen Introduction, James Petrik THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSIONS of human freedom is closely intertwined with the history of philosophical discussions of moral responsibility.
More informationEXECUTION AND INVENTION: DEATH PENALTY DISCOURSE IN EARLY RABBINIC. Press Pp $ ISBN:
EXECUTION AND INVENTION: DEATH PENALTY DISCOURSE IN EARLY RABBINIC AND CHRISTIAN CULTURES. By Beth A. Berkowitz. Oxford University Press 2006. Pp. 349. $55.00. ISBN: 0-195-17919-6. Beth Berkowitz argues
More informationSaving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
More informationDavid Hume s The Self
David Hume s The Self Andrew Rippel Intro to Philosophy 110, Russell Marcus Hume s dealeo with the Self Some philosophers feel the self intimately, are certain of its existence beyond the evidence of a
More informationout in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives an argument specifically
That Thing-I-Know-Not-What by [Perm #7903685] The philosopher George Berkeley, in part of his general thesis against materialism as laid out in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives
More informationBonJour Against Materialism. Just an intellectual bandwagon?
BonJour Against Materialism Just an intellectual bandwagon? What is physicalism/materialism? materialist (or physicalist) views: views that hold that mental states are entirely material or physical in
More informationConsider... Ethical Egoism. Rachels. Consider... Theories about Human Motivations
Consider.... Ethical Egoism Rachels Suppose you hire an attorney to defend your interests in a dispute with your neighbor. In a court of law, the assumption is that in pursuing each client s interest,
More informationConversation with Prof. David Bohm, Birkbeck College, London, 31 July 1990
Conversation with Prof. David Bohm, Birkbeck College, London, 31 July 1990 Arleta Griffor B (David Bohm) A (Arleta Griffor) A. In your book Wholeness and the Implicate Order you write that the general
More informationThe seed of the absolute, the all powerful creative intelligence is embedded within every human being. That which the ego sees as negative works to
THE MASK WE WEAR The mask we wear is our protection from attack. The ego is the creator of the mask. The ego is also who I am in this illusionary world. My ego varies from other egos in different ways
More informationUndergraduate Calendar Content
PHILOSOPHY Note: See beginning of Section H for abbreviations, course numbers and coding. Introductory and Intermediate Level Courses These 1000 and 2000 level courses have no prerequisites, and except
More informationHume s Missing Shade of Blue as a Possible Key. to Certainty in Geometry
Hume s Missing Shade of Blue as a Possible Key to Certainty in Geometry Brian S. Derickson PH 506: Epistemology 10 November 2015 David Hume s epistemology is a radical form of empiricism. It states that
More information1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought
1/7 The Postulates of Empirical Thought This week we are focusing on the final section of the Analytic of Principles in which Kant schematizes the last set of categories. This set of categories are what
More informationLecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.
TOPIC: Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Cosmological argument. The problem of Infinite Regress.
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 : N A T U R E O F R E A L I T Y
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 : N A T U R E O F R E A L I T Y AGENDA 1. Review of Personal Identity 2. The Stuff of Reality 3. Materialistic/Physicalism 4. Immaterial/Idealism PERSONAL IDENTITY
More informationIntroductory Kant Seminar Lecture
Introductory Kant Seminar Lecture Intentionality It is not unusual to begin a discussion of Kant with a brief review of some history of philosophy. What is perhaps less usual is to start with a review
More informationIntroduction. 1 Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, n.d.), 7.
Those who have consciously passed through the field of philosophy would readily remember the popular saying to beginners in this discipline: philosophy begins with the act of wondering. To wonder is, first
More informationAnthony P. Andres. The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic. Anthony P. Andres
[ Loyola Book Comp., run.tex: 0 AQR Vol. W rev. 0, 17 Jun 2009 ] [The Aquinas Review Vol. W rev. 0: 1 The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic From at least the time of John of St. Thomas, scholastic
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationThree Fundamentals of the Introceptive Philosophy
Three Fundamentals of the Introceptive Philosophy Part 9 of 16 Franklin Merrell-Wolff January 19, 1974 Certain thoughts have come to me in the interim since the dictation of that which is on the tape already
More information1/13. Locke on Power
1/13 Locke on Power Locke s chapter on power is the longest chapter of the Essay Concerning Human Understanding and its claims are amongst the most controversial and influential that Locke sets out in
More informationI Found You. Chapter 1. To Begin? Assumptions are peculiar things. Everybody has them, but very rarely does anyone want
Chapter 1 To Begin? Assumptions Assumptions are peculiar things. Everybody has them, but very rarely does anyone want to talk about them. I am not going to pretend that I have no assumptions coming into
More informationEmpiricism. HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3
Empiricism HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3 What can give us more sure knowledge than our senses? How else can we distinguish between the true & the false? -Lucretius The Dream by Henri Rousseau
More informationTHE FIRST NOBLE TRUTH OF SUFFERING : DUKKHA
THE FIRST NOBLE TRUTH OF SUFFERING : DUKKHA The Three Characteristics (tilakkhana) QUESTIONS What do you mean by the word, time? What do you think it is? When you say a person has changed, what do you
More informationMeaning of the Paradox
Meaning of the Paradox Part 1 of 2 Franklin Merrell-Wolff March 22, 1971 I propose at this time to take up a subject which may prove to be of profound interest, namely, what is the significance of the
More informationRealism and its competitors. Scepticism, idealism, phenomenalism
Realism and its competitors Scepticism, idealism, phenomenalism Perceptual Subjectivism Bonjour gives the term perceptual subjectivism to the conclusion of the argument from illusion. Perceptual subjectivism
More informationEarly Russell on Philosophical Grammar
Early Russell on Philosophical Grammar G. J. Mattey Fall, 2005 / Philosophy 156 Philosophical Grammar The study of grammar, in my opinion, is capable of throwing far more light on philosophical questions
More informationthe notion of modal personhood. I begin with a challenge to Kagan s assumptions about the metaphysics of identity and modality.
On Modal Personism Shelly Kagan s essay on speciesism has the virtues characteristic of his work in general: insight, originality, clarity, cleverness, wit, intuitive plausibility, argumentative rigor,
More informationPhil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141
Phil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141 Dialectic: For Hegel, dialectic is a process governed by a principle of development, i.e., Reason
More informationLEIBNITZ. Monadology
LEIBNITZ Explain and discuss Leibnitz s Theory of Monads. Discuss Leibnitz s Theory of Monads. How are the Monads related to each other? What does Leibnitz understand by monad? Explain his theory of monadology.
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Survey Highlighting Christian Perceptions on Criminal Justice
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Survey Highlighting Christian Perceptions on Criminal Justice Fielded by Barna for Prison Fellowship in June 2017 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS Overall, practicing, compared to the general
More informationSounds of Love. Intuition and Reason
Sounds of Love Intuition and Reason Let me talk to you today about intuition and awareness. These two terms are being used so extensively by people around the world. I think it would be a good idea to
More informationCritique of Cosmological Argument
David Hume: Critique of Cosmological Argument Critique of Cosmological Argument DAVID HUME (1711-1776) David Hume is one of the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Born in Edinburgh,
More informationAyer s linguistic theory of the a priori
Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2
More information1/8. Introduction to Kant: The Project of Critique
1/8 Introduction to Kant: The Project of Critique This course is focused on the interpretation of one book: The Critique of Pure Reason and we will, during the course, read the majority of the key sections
More informationWhat one needs to know to prepare for'spinoza's method is to be found in the treatise, On the Improvement
SPINOZA'S METHOD Donald Mangum The primary aim of this paper will be to provide the reader of Spinoza with a certain approach to the Ethics. The approach is designed to prevent what I believe to be certain
More informationApparently conflicting statements like the following make it difficult to determine the nature of Hume's concept of self:
Unidentified Awareness: of the Self Hume's Perceptions CHRISTIAN K. CAMPOLO University of Kansas Apparently conflicting statements like the following make it difficult to determine the nature of Hume's
More informationLogic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationRobert Kiely Office Hours: Tuesday 1-3, Wednesday 1-3, and by appointment
A History of Philosophy: Nature, Certainty, and the Self Fall, 2018 Robert Kiely oldstuff@imsa.edu Office Hours: Tuesday 1-3, Wednesday 1-3, and by appointment Description How do we know what we know?
More informationThe Nature of Death. chapter 8. What Is Death?
chapter 8 The Nature of Death What Is Death? According to the physicalist, a person is just a body that is functioning in the right way, a body capable of thinking and feeling and communicating, loving
More informationspring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7
24.500 spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7 teatime self-knowledge 24.500 S05 1 plan self-blindness, one more time Peacocke & Co. immunity to error through misidentification: Shoemaker s self-reference
More informationRationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt
Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses
More informationa0rxh/ On Van Inwagen s Argument Against the Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts WESLEY H. BRONSON Princeton University
a0rxh/ On Van Inwagen s Argument Against the Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts WESLEY H. BRONSON Princeton University Imagine you are looking at a pen. It has a blue ink cartridge inside, along with
More informationSo, among your current vast store of indubitable beliefs are the following: It seems to me that I am in Philosophy 100.
From last time By following the method of doubt by discarding every belief that could possibly be false Descartes has eliminated every statement about the nature of the physical world. While that eliminates
More informationRussell s Problems of Philosophy
Russell s Problems of Philosophy IT S (NOT) ALL IN YOUR HEAD J a n u a r y 1 9 Today : 1. Review Existence & Nature of Matter 2. Russell s case against Idealism 3. Next Lecture 2.0 Review Existence & Nature
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 14 Lecture - 14 John Locke The empiricism of John
More information1/10. Descartes Laws of Nature
1/10 Descartes Laws of Nature Having traced some of the essential elements of his view of knowledge in the first part of the Principles of Philosophy Descartes turns, in the second part, to a discussion
More informationAdam Smith and the Limits of Empiricism
Adam Smith and the Limits of Empiricism In the debate between rationalism and sentimentalism, one of the strongest weapons in the rationalist arsenal is the notion that some of our actions ought to be
More informationEXAMINERS REPORT AM PHILOSOPHY
EXAMINERS REPORT AM PHILOSOPHY FIRST SESSION 2018 Part 1: Statistical Information Table 1 shows the distribution of the candidates grades for the May 2018 Advanced Level Philosophy Examination. Table1:
More information