1 BonJour Against Materialism Just an intellectual bandwagon?
2 What is physicalism/materialism? materialist (or physicalist) views: views that hold that mental states are entirely material or physical in nature, and correlatively that a complete account of the world, one that leaves nothing out, can be given in entirely materialist terms. Lurking here is the difficult issue of what sorts of entities or properties count as material or physical. Is there any good way to delimit the realm of the material that does not preclude further discoveries in physics, but also does not trivialize the category by allowing it to include anything that people in departments labeled Physics might eventually come to study?
3 Why is physicalism dominant? 1. Because Cartesian dualism is wrong. 2. Because of the success of science that assumes materialism. 3. Because the material universe is causally closed. 4. Because naturalism is true. 5. (Materialism is just an intellectual bandwagon/religious conviction)
4 There is a presumption of physicalism BonJour: One of the oddest things about discussions of materialism is the way in which the conviction that some materialist view must be correct seems to float free of the defense of any particular materialist view. Daniel Stoljar (SEP entry on Physicalism): The first thing to say when considering the truth of physicalism is that we live in an overwhelmingly physicalist or materialist intellectual culture. The result is that, as things currently stand, the standards of argumentation required to persuade someone of the truth of physicalism are much lower than the standards required to persuade someone of its negation.
5 1. Cartesian dualism is no good BonJour concedes that there are problems with some versions of dualism, especially Cartesian interactionist substance dualism. This is an argument from elimination. BonJour claims that such arguments in philosophy are weak, especially when the subject matter is poorly understood. (I would suggest that BonJour is perhaps overlooking the main reason to be a materialist here: the absence of a coherent, conceptually-clear alternative.)
6 2. The success of materialist science materialist science trying to understand the observable phenomena in terms of material particles following laws has been a highly successful project. BonJour concedes that This undeniably has some modest weight. How strong is this argument?
7 3. Causal Closure We believe that the material universe is causally closed: material things are never causally affected by anything non-material physical science can in principle give a completely adequate explanation of any physical occurrence, without needing to mention anything nonphysical. Stoljar (SEP): The Argument from Causal Closure is perhaps the dominant argument for physicalism in the literature today. But it is somewhat unclear whether it is successful.
8 Doesn t rule out epiphenomenal souls, etc. Epiphenomenalism: conscious phenomena are sideeffects of material processes that are incapable of having any reciprocal influence on the material world. Main problem for epiphenomenalism: it becomes difficult or seemingly impossible to see how verbal discussions of conscious phenomena such as this chapter and many others can be genuinely about them in the way that they seem obviously to be.
9 Why accept Causal Closure? Thus, given the premise of causal closure, the inference to physicalism is very strong. But is there a good reason to accept the premise? BonJour can t find any good reason to accept causal closure, except on the basis that materialism is true. Thus to argue for the truth of materialism or for a strong presumption in favor of materialism by appeal to the principle of causal closure is putting the cart in quite a flagrant way before the horse.
10 Is there an alternative to causal closure? If Cartesian dualism is true, then what will physics look like? If some kind of property dualism is true, what will physics look like? (Like quantum mechanics!!!)
11 4. The appeal to naturalism What is naturalism? A view that is hard to pin down, or make precise, BonJour says, despite eagerness to fly the naturalist flag. For some, naturalism is the same as materialism Methodological naturalism says that it is rational to be guided in one s metaphysical commitments by the methods of natural science (Stoljar) If we endorse methodological naturalism, then should we be physicalists? What s the argument?
12 4. The appeal to naturalism 1. We should let natural science tell us what the world is like, what kinds of entity it contains, etc. 2. Natural science reveals a purely physical world of material particles, fields, etc It is rational to accept physicalism
13 BonJour s responses 1. Why think that the methods of natural science exhaust the methods of reasonable inquiry? This claim could not be proved using such methods! 2. Physics tells us about the physical aspects of reality. How could it tell us that there are no other aspects? Surely this is a question that physics itself cannot address?
14 Conclusion BonJour concludes that there is no good argument for physicalism. Thoughts? (I would suggest that BonJour is perhaps overlooking the main reason to be a materialist here: the absence of a coherent, conceptually-clear alternative.)
15 Problems for physicalism There is only one materialist view of mental states that can be taken seriously (functionalism) Eliminative materialism is not serious J.J.C. Smart s psycho-physical identity theory isn t serious either, apparently. And functionalism is hopeless! But the deepest problem for the functionalist is that the characterization of mental states in terms of causal role says nothing at all about consciousness or conscious character. There is no apparent reason why a state that realizes a particular causal role would thereby need to have any specific sort of conscious character (the point made by the familiar reversed spectrum cases) or indeed any conscious character at all.
16 In particular, BonJour argues that functionalism cannot account for either: a. phenomenal qualities (qualia) or b. conscious intentionality.
17 The Mary argument Mary is a neuroscientist who knows all the physical facts about the physiology of human colour vision. 2. Mary has never had a colour experience, since she has only ever lived in a black-and-white environment. 3. According to physicalism, all facts are physical facts, expressible in the language of physics. 4. There is a real fact concerning what it is like to have each type of colour experience (e.g. red). 5. Assume that physicalism is true. 6. Mary doesn t know what it is like to have colour experiences The fact of what it is like to have a red colour experience is a physical fact (from 3, 4, 5) 8. Mary knows what it is like to have a red colour experience. (from 1, 5) 9. Contradiction (6, 8). 10. Physicalism is false. (5, 9)
18 Challenges to Mary Mary gains something, but doesn t learn any new facts. She gains some kind of ability? Maybe a new conceptual or representational ability? 2. Mary doesn t learn any new facts, because she already knew all the facts. What she gains are new phenomenal concepts for describing old facts. Phenomenal concepts can be acquired only from the relevant experiences
19 The Mary argument 1.1 While in the room, Mary is given colour samples, one red one green, labelled only as A and B. Will she be able to give them their usual names? Suppose Mary is told that one of the samples is green and the other red. Will Mary know which of the following claims is true? 1. A is green and B is red 2. A is red and B is green Surely it is a fact that (2) is true and (1) is false?
20 Moreover, according to BonJour, it still seems quite clear that Mary doesn t know which statement is true, until she sees (e.g.) freshly-mown grass. Does this refute the no new fact response?
21 New knowledge, old fact? You philosophers are really amazing! The idea that I already know the facts I am interested in indeed all facts of that general kind is simply preposterous.
22 Conscious intentional content One crucial feature of such conscious thoughts is that when I have them, I am in general consciously aware of or consciously understand or grasp what it is that I am thinking about (and also what I am thinking about it). This conscious grasp of the propositions one is thinking about is rarely if ever merely disquotational, BonJour says. This conscious grasp is of narrow content only, i.e. subjective meaning.
23 Mary again! Suppose that Mary studies me as a subject and comes to have a complete knowledge of my physical and neurophysiological makeup as I am thinking these various thoughts. Can she determine on that basis what I am consciously thinking about at a particular moment? This question can be broken into two: a. Does a physical description of my brain state tell Mary this? b. Does adding knowledge of causal connections to external objects help? (Functionalists see this as essential.)
24 For (a), BonJour says clearly no. One thing that seems utterly clear is that she could not do this merely on the basis of knowing my internal physical characteristics No real argument given here. The main problem with (b), BonJour thinks, is that we have introspective access to our own propositional meanings (narrow content only). But we surely have no such first-person access to external causal connections?
25 Causal relations to external things may help to produce the relevant features of the internal states in question, but there is no apparent way in which such external relations can somehow be partly constitutive of the fact that my conscious thoughts are about various things in a way of which I can be immediately aware. But if these internal states are sufficient to fix the object of my thought in a way that is accessible to my understanding or awareness, then knowing about those internal states should be sufficient for Mary as well, without any knowledge of the external causal relations.
26 Could thoughts be transparent?... if we were simply material, that would prevent us from knowing anything at all, there being nothing so inconceivable as the idea that matter knows itself. It is impossible for us to know how it would know itself. Blaise Pascal, Pensées (1669) Perception, and that which depends upon it, are inexplicable by mechanical causes, that is to say, by figures and motions. Leibniz, Monadology (1714) Sec
27 Diagonal thoughts The notion that thoughts are transparent, so that Mary (or Laplace s demon) could logically deduce our belief-contents from physical descriptions of our brain states, has long seemed (to me) to lead to contradiction. The problem is that a thinking machine (a transparent thinking being) could form thoughts about itself. Then one can construct a diagonal thought that is easy to grasp, but not graspable by the machine (on pain of contradiction).
28 Analogue, using a similar diagonal property Theorem: Some properties of natural numbers are not expressed by any well-formed formula, or wff (with one free variable) of that language. Take a formal language of arithmetic (call it L). Every wff in L has a Gödel number, a code number. Then, for any given wff of L (with one free variable), it s always meaningful to ask whether it is satisfied by its own Gödel number. Define a natural number p to be inclusive (w.r.t. L) just in case: (i) p is the code number of a wff Φ with one free variable, and (ii) p satisfies Φ. Then inclusive is a well-defined property of natural numbers. Now suppose that inclusive is expressed by a wff of L, say Ψ. Then there is also a wff Ψ, expressing the property of being noninclusive. The wff Ψ has a code number, say g. We then see, of course, that g satisfies Ψ if and only if it does not, which is a contradiction.
29 1. Assumption: there exists a machine that has beliefs roughly equal to that of a human. 2. The subjective proposition of each belief logically follows from the complete physical state of the machine. 3. The machine s intentional states are effectively sentences of a language L -- a very special language that needs no semantics. 4. L includes existential physical propositions, of the form at least one thing has the property P, where P is any physical property 5. Definition: An inclusive state is a sentence S in L such that, when the machine is in state S it is considering an existential physical proposition, and the state S itself has the property P in question. 6. Inclusive is a physical property, and also not a physical property. 29
30 inclusive is a physical property S is inclusive The machine in state S is thinking Some state has P, and P is a physical property Given a state S, physically defined, Laplace s demon can infer the semantic content of S, and whether or not P(S) holds. Hence the demon can infer from S s physical description whether or not S is inclusive. 30
31 inclusive is not a physical property 1. Assume that being an inclusive state is a physical property. 2. not inclusive is also a physical property. 3. The machine can form the thought: Some states are not inclusive. 4. There is some state D in L whose meaning is Some states are not inclusive. 5. D itself is inclusive if and only if D is not inclusive. (Contradiction) 6. Inclusive is not a physical property. 31
32 It is impossible for us to think that a physical system can be aware that it is a physical system. Pascal (modified) 32
33 What is the alternative? Yes, things get sketchy.
Michael Lacewing The knowledge argument PROPERTY DUALISM Property dualism is the view that, although there is just one kind of substance, physical substance, there are two fundamentally different kinds
Cartesian Dualism I am not my body Dualism = two-ism Concerning human beings, a (substance) dualist says that the mind and body are two different substances (things). The brain is made of matter, and part
17. Tying it up: thoughts and intentionality Martín Abreu Zavaleta June 23, 2014 1 Frege on thoughts Frege is concerned with separating logic from psychology. In addressing such separations, he coins a
Cartesian Dualism I am not my body Dualism = two-ism Concerning human beings, a (substance) dualist says that the mind and body are two different substances (things). The brain is made of matter, and part
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics Scepticism, and the Mind 2 Last Time we looked at scepticism about INDUCTION. This Lecture will move on to SCEPTICISM
The Mind/Body Problem This book briefly explains the problem of explaining consciousness and three proposals for how to do it. Site: HCC Eagle Online Course: 6143-PHIL-1301-Introduction to Philosophy-S8B-13971
Summary of Elements of Mind Tim Crane Elements of Mind (EM) has two themes, one major and one minor. The major theme is intentionality, the mind s direction upon its objects; the other is the mind-body
What is Physicalism? Jackson (1986): Physicalism is not the noncontroversial thesis that the actual world is largely physical, but the challenging thesis that it is entirely physical. This is why physicalists
119 Chapter Six Putnam's Anti-Realism So far, our discussion has been guided by the assumption that there is a world and that sentences are true or false by virtue of the way it is. But this assumption
Diametros nr 29 (wrzesień 2011): 80-92 THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE Karol Polcyn 1. PRELIMINARIES Chalmers articulates his argument in terms of two-dimensional
AS A COURTESY TO OUR SPEAKER AND AUDIENCE MEMBERS, PLEASE SILENCE ALL PAGERS AND CELL PHONES Please remember to sign-in by scanning your badge Department of Psychiatry Grand Rounds James M. Stedman, PhD.
Published in H. Pashler (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of the Mind (2013), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 633 636 doi:10.4135/9781452257044 firstname.lastname@example.org Realism and instrumentalism Mark Sprevak
Nagel, Naturalism and Theism Todd Moody (Saint Joseph s University, Philadelphia) In his recent controversial book, Mind and Cosmos, Thomas Nagel writes: Many materialist naturalists would not describe
Lecture 8 Property Dualism Frank Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia and What Mary Didn t Know 1 Agenda 1. Physicalism, Qualia, and Epiphenomenalism 2. Property Dualism 3. Thought Experiment 1: Fred 4. Thought
Intentionality, Information and Consciousness: A Naturalistic Perspective A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LIX, No.2, June 1999 On David Chalmers's The Conscious Mind SYDNEY SHOEMAKER Cornell University One does not have to agree with the main conclusions of David
Metaphysics & Consciousness A talk by Larry Muhlstein A brief note on philosophy It is about thinking So think about what I am saying and ask me questions And go home and think some more For self improvement
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism (continued)
The Philosophical Review, Vol. 111, No. 4 (October 2002) John Perry, Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001. Pp. xvi, 221. In this lucid, deep, and entertaining book (based
GENERAL PHILOSOPHY WEEK 5: MIND & BODY JONNY MCINTOSH INTRODUCTION Last week: The Mind-Body Problem(s) Introduced Descartes's Argument from Doubt This week: Descartes's Epistemological Argument Frank Jackson's
Wright on response-dependence and self-knowledge March 23, 2004 1 Response-dependent and response-independent concepts........... 1 1.1 The intuitive distinction......................... 1 1.2 Basic equations
Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies., Please cite the published version when available. Title Zombies and their possibilities Authors(s)
: What are some of the capacities that make humans unique? (p.389 k.4195) Biblical anthropology explains these unique and distinguishing abilities in terms of the human person being an embodied or. (p.389
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
Philip Goff Experiences Don t Sum According to Galen Strawson, there could be no such thing as brute emergence. If weallow thatcertain x s can emergefromcertain y s in a way that is unintelligible, even
The Physical World Author(s): Barry Stroud Source: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 87 (1986-1987), pp. 263-277 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Aristotelian
Lecture 5 Philosophy of Mind: Dualism Barbara Montero On the Philosophy of the Mind 1 Agenda 1. Barbara Montero 2. The Mind-Body Problem 3. Descartes Argument for Dualism 4. Theistic Version of Descartes
Physicalism and Conceptual Analysis * Esa Díaz-León email@example.com Physicalism is a widely held claim about the nature of the world. But, as it happens, it also has its detractors. The first step
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2016 Class #7 Finishing the Meditations Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Slide 1 Business # Today An exercise with your
PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS Methods that Metaphysicians Use Method 1: The appeal to what one can imagine where imagining some state of affairs involves forming a vivid image of that state of affairs.
Dualism: What s at stake? Dualists posit that reality is comprised of two fundamental, irreducible types of stuff : Material and non-material Material Stuff: Includes all the familiar elements of the physical
1/7 The Postulates of Empirical Thought This week we are focusing on the final section of the Analytic of Principles in which Kant schematizes the last set of categories. This set of categories are what
EPIPHENOMENALISM Keith Campbell and Nicholas J.J. Smith December 1993 Written for the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Epiphenomenalism is a theory concerning the relation between the mental and physical
Philosophical Issues, 14, Epistemology, 2004 SKEPTICISM, ABDUCTIVISM, AND THE EXPLANATORY GAP Ram Neta University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill I. Introduction:The Skeptical Problem and its Proposed Abductivist
Beyond Physicalism and Idealism: Readings in From Brain to Cosmos Mark F. Sharlow Abstract This document consists primarily of an excerpt (chapter 13) from the author s book From Brain to Cosmos. In that
Oxford Scholarship Online Abstracts and Keywords ISBN 9780198802693 Title The Value of Rationality Author(s) Ralph Wedgwood Book abstract Book keywords Rationality is a central concept for epistemology,
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
Logical Consequence UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016 John MacFarlane 1 Intuitive characterizations of consequence Modal: It is necessary (or apriori) that, if the premises are true, the conclusion
Minds and Machines spring 2003 Hill and Nagel on the appearance of contingency, contd. 1 can the physicalist credibly deny (1)? 1. If I can clearly and distinctly conceive a proposition p to be true, then
For Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Remarks on a Foundationalist Theory of Truth Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh I Tim Maudlin s Truth and Paradox offers a theory of truth that arises from
Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation As Published Publisher Levine, Joseph.
TEL-AVIV UNIVERSITY LESTER & SALLY ENTIN FACULTY OF HUMANTIES THE SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY Life, Automata and the Mind-Body Problem Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Vered Glickman
Lecture 6 Objections to Dualism Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia Correspondence between Descartes Gilbert Ryle The Ghost in the Machine 1 Agenda 1. Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia 2. The Interaction Problem
Critical Realism & Philosophy Webinar Ruth Groff August 5, 2015 Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary You don t have to become a philosopher, but just as philosophers should know their way around
1 Department/Program 2012-2016 Assessment Plan Department: Philosophy Directions: For each department/program student learning outcome, the department will provide an assessment plan, giving detailed information
Property Dualism and the Knowledge Argument: Are Qualia Really a Problem for Physicalism? Ronald Planer Rutgers Univerity Abstract: Where does the mind fit into the physical world? Not surprisingly, philosophers
Frank Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia The following is excerpted from Frank Jackson s article Epiphenomenal Qualia published in Philosophical Quarterly in 1982, and his article What Mary Didn t Know published
The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates edited by Ned Block, Owen Flanagan and Güven Güzeldere Cambridge: Mass.: MIT Press 1997 pp.xxix + 843 Theories of the mind have been celebrating their
24.09x Minds and Machines Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity Excerpt from Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity (Harvard, 1980). Identity theorists have been concerned with several distinct types of identifications:
Phil 1103 Review Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science? 1. Copernican Revolution Students should be familiar with the basic historical facts of the Copernican revolution.
1. The Scope of Skepticism Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument The scope of skeptical challenges can vary in a number
5 A Modal Version of the Ontological Argument E. J. L O W E Moreland, J. P.; Sweis, Khaldoun A.; Meister, Chad V., Jul 01, 2013, Debating Christian Theism The original version of the ontological argument
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
THE MORAL ARGUMENT Peter van Inwagen Introduction, James Petrik THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSIONS of human freedom is closely intertwined with the history of philosophical discussions of moral responsibility.
1/10 The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism The Fourth Paralogism is quite different from the three that preceded it because, although it is treated as a part of rational psychology, it main
Abstract: Divisibility, Logic, Radical Empiricism, and Metaphysics We will explore the problem of the manner in which the world may be divided into parts, and how this affects the application of logic.
Examining the nature of mind Michael Daniels A review of Understanding Consciousness by Max Velmans (Routledge, 2000). Max Velmans is Reader in Psychology at Goldsmiths College, University of London. Over
Indiana Undergraduate Journal of Cognitive Science 4 (2009) 81-96 Copyright 2009 IUJCS. All rights reserved Overcoming Cartesian Intuitions: A Defense of Type-Physicalism Ronald J. Planer Rutgers University
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 D A Y 2 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism
Philosophical Perspectives, 16, Language and Mind, 2002 THE AIM OF BELIEF 1 Ralph Wedgwood Merton College, Oxford 0. Introduction It is often claimed that beliefs aim at the truth. Indeed, this claim has
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXVIII, No. 1, January 2004 Subjective Character and Reflexive Content DAVID M. ROSENTHAL City University of New York Graduate Center Philosophy and Cognitive
Comments on Truth at A World for Modal Propositions Christopher Menzel Texas A&M University March 16, 2008 Since Arthur Prior first made us aware of the issue, a lot of philosophical thought has gone into
There are two explanatory gaps Dr Tom McClelland University of Glasgow 1 THERE ARE TWO EXPLANATORY GAPS ABSTRACT The explanatory gap between the physical and the phenomenal is at the heart of the Problem
Introduction to Philosophy Fall 2015 Test 3--Answers 1. According to Descartes, a. what I really am is a body, but I also possess a mind. b. minds and bodies can t causally interact with one another, but
Merricks on the existence of human organisms Cian Dorr August 24, 2002 Merricks s Overdetermination Argument against the existence of baseballs depends essentially on the following premise: BB Whenever
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXVII, No. 1, July 2003 Experience and Foundationalism in Audi s The Architecture of Reason WALTER SINNOTT-ARMSTRONG Dartmouth College Robert Audi s The Architecture
Primitive Concepts David J. Chalmers Conceptual Analysis: A Traditional View A traditional view: Most ordinary concepts (or expressions) can be defined in terms of other more basic concepts (or expressions)
Introduction to Philosophy Fall 2018 Test 3: Answers 1. According to Descartes, a. what I really am is a body, but I also possess a mind. b. minds and bodies can t causally interact with one another, but
Stout s teleological theory of action Jeff Speaks November 26, 2004 1 The possibility of externalist explanations of action................ 2 1.1 The distinction between externalist and internalist explanations
How Do We Know Anything about Mathematics? - A Defence of Platonism Majda Trobok University of Rijeka original scientific paper UDK: 141.131 1:51 510.21 ABSTRACT In this paper I will try to say something
Department of Philosophy TCD Great Philosophers Dennett Tom Farrell Department of Philosophy TCD Department of Surgical Anatomy RCSI Department of Clinical Medicine RCSI 1. Socrates 2. Plotinus 3. Augustine
Projection in Hume P J E Kail St. Peter s College, Oxford Peter.firstname.lastname@example.org A while ago now (2007) I published my Projection and Realism in Hume s Philosophy (Oxford University Press henceforth abbreviated
K.V. LAURIKAINEN EXTENDING THE LIMITS OF SCIENCE Tarja Kallio-Tamminen Contents Abstract My acquintance with K.V. Laurikainen Various flavours of Copenhagen What proved to be wrong Revelations of quantum
Broad on God Broad on Theological Arguments I. The Ontological Argument Sample Ontological Argument: Suppose that God is the most perfect or most excellent being. Consider two things: (1)An entity that
Blackwell Oxford, PAPQ Pacific 0031-5621 December 84 41000 Original THE PACIFIC 2003 TROUBLE Philosophical University UK Article PHILOSOPHICAL Publishing 2003 WITH of Quarterly Southern LtdMARY QUARTERLY
Forthcoming in Analysis Reviews Summary of Sensorama: A Phenomenalist Analysis of Spacetime and Its Contents Michael Pelczar National University of Singapore What is time? Time is the measure of motion.
Constructing the World Lecture 1: A Scrutable World David Chalmers Plan *1. Laplace s demon 2. Primitive concepts and the Aufbau 3. Problems for the Aufbau 4. The scrutability base 5. Applications Laplace
Putnam: Meaning and Reference The Traditional Conception of Meaning combines two assumptions: Meaning and psychology Knowing the meaning (of a word, sentence) is being in a psychological state. Even Frege,
24.500 spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7 teatime self-knowledge 24.500 S05 1 plan self-blindness, one more time Peacocke & Co. immunity to error through misidentification: Shoemaker s self-reference
Francesca Hovagimian Philosophy of Psychology Professor Dinishak 5 March 2016 The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia In his essay Epiphenomenal Qualia, Frank Jackson makes the case
Philosophy of Mathematics Kant Owen Griffiths email@example.com St John s College, Cambridge 20/10/15 Immanuel Kant Born in 1724 in Königsberg, Prussia. Enrolled at the University of Königsberg in 1740 and
PHILOSOPHY OF MIND: FALL 2015 (5AANB012) Credits: 15 units Tutor: Dr. Matthew Parrott Office: 603 Philosophy Building Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Consultation Hours: Tuesday 5-6 & Wednesday 3:30-4:30